|
The MoA Week In Review – (Not Ukraine) OT 2023-85
Last week's post on Moon of Alabama:
— Other issues:
Empire:
Ukraine:
Signs of the time:
The Island:
Use as open (not Ukraine related) thread …
@AG | Apr 10 2023 15:02 utc | 98
Firstly, anarchism means to some extent, whatever you want it to be, but it originated, as best we know, in Greece and China independently, where in both societies, multiple people rejected the right of groups to employ coercion,and recognising that societies are necessarily coercive, concluding that societies are inherently unethical. From this, it received the name ápxóç (arkhós), often translated as “ruler”, but literally meaning “source” or “beginning”, prefixed by áν (án-), “not or without”, meaning “without a souce” or “without a ruler”, as used e.g. during the Year of Thirty Tyrants, 404 BCE, when there was no archon. Meanwhile, politics, which in Greece at the time involved city states, originated as Πολιτικά (politiká), meaning ‘affairs of the cities’, applying to the management of activities in which social groups engage. So anarchy is literally an absence of a ruler, but it started off as a rejection of coersion, which can be a left or right activity. In the US, terrified by nihilists, it has retained the sense with which it entered modern English in the 1600s from middle French of “without order”, “confusion”, “chaos”or “absence of authority in general” which it possessed prior to 1849, when it was used by the French political philosopher Pierre-Joseph Proudhon to describe a social theory advocating “order without power,” proposing that associations and co-operatives could replace existing systems of government, long before, “state and central Bolshevik government” existed.
Secondly you are completely wrong about Stalin, who not only wrote about direct democracy, but twice offered to resign and was ultimately murdered by the Ukrainian communist party bosses over his intention to extend direct democracy from the local level to replace the “revolutionary government of the people striving towards communism” ruling the USSR with actual communism (where the people own and control the means of production which requires direct rather than representative democracy).
I’d need a citation to discuss your allegations about Stalin congratulating Churchill, whom Stalin referered to as a “warmonger”.
“Same with some segments of Hungarian uprising in 1956 or Prague.
Stalin was of course aware of this.”
Stalin was murdered in 1953. He had an autopsy. His brain was removed and stored in the Brain Institute in Moscow. I find it incredible that he was aware of anything in 1956.
Chomsky is a liberal, captured by the Democrats to the extent that he even told people to vote for the far right No-Hope Obama, oligarch Hildemort and Senile Joe, and a deep disappointment. That tells you everything you need to know about Chomsky.
Posted by: Hermit | Apr 10 2023 19:12 utc | 109
@Jo Dominich | Apr 10 2023 14:30 utc | 96
I don’t actually have the time to perform a “Fisking” like this these days, but your wrong-minded attitude appears so common on this board that correcting it in detail is probably a necessary public service.
“The thing is there is too far too much emphasis on ‘Rights’ and very little on ‘Responsibilities. The world ‘inclusion’ is bandied around by Govts as necessary. However, there is nothing ‘inclusive’ about this strategy it is, in essence, extremely divisive.”
What is divisive is when a bunch of oligarchs use wedge issues to persuade the weak of intellect to accept that some people, including children, do not deserve the same consideration, respect, dignity and rights as others. Tell me ehat “responsibility” makes it necessary for bullying to cause eight out of 10 trans youth in the UK to self-harm, and over half to attempt suicide? Do you see bullying as a responsibility that should ne enforced, these children’s rights as optional, or something else?
“I am ok with giving the minorities in society their right to voice their views and opinions.”>
You are so generous! At least, until you say, “however”, an equivalent to “but”. As Sandor Clegane no(the Hound), younger brother of Ser Gregor Clegane tells Tyrion Lannister, his brother said to him in Game of Thrones, “nothing somebody tells you before the word ,’but’ really counts.” “However”, as soon as you feel somewhat offended, you want to justify eliminating “their right”, and a “right” which is conditional is not a “right” at all. Particularly when it is dependent on not hurting people’s feelings, which, as you demonstrate so well, is all but impossible in this hypersensitive age.
“However, what I’m not o.k. with is that this is being heavily promoted to children 6yrs of age and upwards in schools as a good lifestyle.
That’s good, because that is not what is happening. Children are being taught the reality that all gender is a continuum, and that no position on that spectrum is inferior or superior. It is just how people are, depending on genetics, epigenetics, possibly environmental factors, as well as company and time. This offends people insecure about their own gender alignment, possibly imagining that it is a “choice” because of that, and insisting on teaching people to hate those who are different. Orvperhaps it is causes by bigotry instilled by their religion or their upbringing. That still does not justify the denial of the rights of those who are different.
“Children of this age do not and should not have sexual identities, they are innocent children.”
I have news for you. You have a sexual identity from when you are born, sometimes before you take your first drink or shit, because birth, a process many people have experienced, involves floods of endorphins which pass through the placenta. and girls with swollen labia. Some are born with both. Sexuality is not something that happens when you come of age. Apparently you have been grievously misinformed your whole life.
Perhaps what you meant to say is that children should not be sexualized. Think about the fact that children grew up in one room crofts until the 1960s, often sleeping in the same beds as their parents. And yet, women tended to have many children until we had access to reliable contraception, and safe access to abortion when it failed. Presumably they made babies the same way as everything else does. People lived closer to nature then, and must have grown up with the examples of animals before them. Presumably children were as curious about this as children are today. Were those children sexualized? Was it good or bad? How about the children fondled, fiddled or fucked by their priests or bishops? Was that sexualization? If so was it better or worse than what schools are teaching to save young lives? You do know that conservatives in late 19th Century London resisted attempt to control prostitution, when “eight year old whores could be had for the price of a pork pie”, in much the way you are arguing now? Were they wrong to try to prevent the sexualization of children then, or are you wrong trying to preserve bullying today?
On a personal note, I made sure my daughter had access to our medical and sexually explicit library from the time she knew to wash her hands before touching books or herself, and she understood more about sexuality and gender before she was ten than you seem to do now. Because we never made an issue of it, she accepted the information as she accepted any other knowledge – and when she chose to attend school, was a far more reliable source of information to her peers than playground rumors. She is now an independent young lady and comfortable with herself and others. But she does get annoyed at hypocrisy and bigotry and would probably not remain as calm as I have here, in the face of an adult advocating policies that harm children.
“It is social and very close to genetic engineering.”
LOL! Apparently the society in which you live not only requires corrective action and anti-bigotry and bullying education, but also better education of what constitutes genetics (those genes you inherit from your parents, which work with epigenetics to determine how your genes are expressed).
“Thank God the Tavistock Institute here in the UK was forced to shut down
You appear to be wrong about this. See their website at https://www.tavinstitute.org.
“allegedly ‘treating’ children as young as 6yrs for Gender dysmorphia.
Studies (e.g. A HREF=”https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2762788″>Zaliznyak, Michael; Bresee, Catherine; Garcia, Maurice M.(2020-03-16). Age at First Experience of Gender Dysphoria Among Transgender Adults Seeking Gender-Affirming Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e201236. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1236) reflect that the majority of transgender patients experience gender dysphoria in early childhood (before 7), and that untreated gender dysphoria can result in poor quality of life for transgender people, beginning in childhood and lasting throughout adolescence and adulthood. So treatment and normalization are both critical. That said, nobody but an appropriately qualified and licensed medical professional can treat, let alone diagnose any condition, particulary a complex condition involving genetics, epigenetics and possibly the environment
like gender dysmorphia. Which is far more prevalent, particularly in children, especially in gender-coercive societies that do not simply acknowledge peoples’ differences and move on, than the public, and even uneducated professionals tend to understand. At my daughter’s high school, with under 1000 children, not on the buckle of the US bible-belt, but a little South and backwards, so to speak, there were at least 10 to 15 non-binary children and three more that committed suicide before that age. I have known two of them since before entering school, elementary school when they self-identified as non-binary. Fortunately, their perfectly normal parents eventually understood and supported them. That was in an environment was supportive, but the general public was not. So I’m fairly certain that despite these “allegations” that the Tavistock Institute had appropriate clinical support, and if clinic providing services to children who are at risk and need assistance, depriving them of support is closed down, it will be a disservice to children, the parents relatives and friends of those who commit suicide, and ultimately, to society forced to deal with disturbed adults because children were denied appropriate support.
” Were it not hammered in schools, these children wouldn’t have these issues.
Bullahit. The prevalence of suicide in the non-binary community where support is not provided proves your statement to be a lie. Did you come up with it yourself, or were you simple-minded enough to accept it from somebody else?
“When any Govt or Nation gives overt, constant coverage and preference to views of the minorities over and above the rest of the population it is a recipe for the collapse of the nation. I cannot remember the full original quote but it is very apposite.
Funny. That’s not how I see it. I see people who do not know that they have non-binary relatives being terrorized about something that will not affect them ot their children, but if it does they would rather their children or the children of others commit suicide rather than have to wonder if they did something wring or be exposed to the non-binary, and, I see people who care about children trying to protect them from people like this.
Which group do you imagine makes better neighbors?
Highly trained medical and educational personnel tend to care about people, particularly children, or they probably would not be in the jobs they are in. Which is why the vast majority support providing children the help they need and to prevent bullying. What qualifications and evidence do you have, causing you to reject their evidence based conclusions? If the answer is “none”, please ask yourself why you believe as you do, and consider the idea that you may have been propagandized by “constant coverage and” alleged “preference” by people with an agenda.
Posted by: Hermit | Apr 10 2023 21:49 utc | 113
Lavrov held a presser today after his meeting with Kazakhstan’s new FM Mikhail Nurtleu, which IMO was rather normal as you can judge from the Q&A:
Question: What areas will be given attention this year and will information security become one of the key priorities in the current geopolitical situation?
Sergey Lavrov: We have just signed a plan for consultations between our ministries. This is a traditional document: one plan is executed, the second one is immediately adopted. This is an ongoing process of ongoing coordination at the level of ministers, their deputies, directors of departments, experts. It is an extensive network of consultations, culminating in most cases in specific recommendations. Subsequently, they form the basis of practical decisions that are taken by ministers, reported to presidents, prime ministers and cover almost every conceivable area. They concern diplomatic support through the foreign ministries of integration processes and processes developing in a bilateral format in the EEU, CIS, CSTO, EAEU. It’s a lot of work. All aspects of our relationship are interrelated. We are talking about a large group of neighboring countries, about various aspects of allied strategic cooperation. In addition to our large region, the topics of consultations cover other aspects of the functioning of cooperation and interaction mechanisms in Asia, in Eurasia as a whole. These are international issues that are considered on the agenda of the UN, the OSCE, which is experiencing a deep crisis (this was also discussed in detail today), not only regional issues, but also functional ones, such as disarmament, arms control, environmental protection, and climate change. I can list endlessly.
In fact, everything significant in international and regional affairs is the subject of a close consultative and coordination process. I am sure that the plan just signed will have a result.
Question: The Soros Foundation in Central Asia has decided to rebrand. Now they will be called CAPS Unlock (Central Asian policy studies) or simply the Central Asian Analytical Center. The headquarters will be located in Almaty. How does Russia assess any strengthening of the work of Western NGOs in countries that are traditionally friendly to Russia, including Kazakhstan? What can you say about that?
Sergey Lavrov: If we are talking about transparent, understandable, civil society contacts based on the legislation of the host country, I don’t see anything wrong with that.
Let me remind you that after the Soviet Union disappeared and the Russian Federation became an independent state, we actively welcomed non-governmental organizations from various countries. We were sincerely ready for cooperation in this area, took initiatives and responded to our partners’ proposals.
But as our society has evolved, the ulterior motives that have guided many nongovernmental organizations, including those commonly associated with the Soros Foundation, have been uncovered. They openly promoted a policy that ignores the legitimate interests of the Russian Federation, our legislation and defended the needs of Western countries. The West finances, including through the state, numerous non-governmental organizations. When this activity began to go beyond the boundaries of all decency, not to mention the boundaries of legislation, we began to pay attention to it. As a result, most of them ceased their activities in Russia.
I proceed from the fact that each state (Russia, Kazakhstan or any other country) independently determines the level to which it is ready to promote the development of contacts through civil society. I have no doubt that serious, self-respecting States and Governments will not tolerate violations of their laws and attempts to interfere in internal affairs on any line.
As for the structure you mentioned, I have not heard that there has been a rebranding. Frankly speaking, the Soros Foundation (whatever it is called) already has a stable reputation. I think everybody knows that.
Question: What kind of work are countries doing to unlock their transit and transport potential and launch major international routes between Europe, Asia, North and South?
Sergey Lavrov: This is a topical question. In short, we are actively working.
All the issues you have mentioned and the dimensions of this task of developing transport and logistics potential are of paramount importance.
I will mention the North-South international transport corridor as the first priority at this stage. This project is now being actively implemented. Upon its completion, a stable, prompt, fast connection between the Baltic Sea, the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean will be ensured, which will significantly reduce the costs for trade on the large Eurasian continent.
I would like to mention Russia’s contribution to improving transit conditions and transport infrastructure. I am referring to the modernisation of the Trans-Siberian Railway and the Baikal-Amur Mainline. The Russian leadership pays special attention to the modernization of the Northern Sea Route – ensuring the safe, reliable, year-round use of this shortest route between Europe and the Far East and South Asia as a whole.
Kazakhstan actively participates in projects that are being implemented in parallel. There is a project of a transport route through the Caspian Sea. Recently, President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev paid a visit to Kazakhstan, where routes for transporting hydrocarbons and other goods and services were also discussed.
I proceed from the fact that Eurasia has a huge future, especially at the current stage, when the center of development of the world economy and trade has shifted here, to the east of the Eurasian continent. These objective comparative advantages should be enjoyed to the mutual benefit of all organizations and all the countries located here.
In 2016, President Vladimir Putin proposed at the Russia-ASEAN summit to work in favour of forming a greater Eurasian partnership on our continent with the participation, as he stressed, of all organisations and all the countries located here without exception. This is certainly a gigantic goal. But the movement towards it has begun.
Question: Russia recently published a new Foreign Policy Concept. It refers to a broader integration contour, which you mentioned in your previous reply. Can you please clarify what exactly this integration circuit will be? Which countries will be included in it?
Does Moscow believe that the current level of relations between its Eurasian partners, in particular Kazakhstan, with the United States and the European Union somehow threatens its interests?
Sergey Lavrov: As for the integration contour. We advocate that all multilateral, subregional structures and all countries located on the vast single Eurasian continent be part of this process without exception. At the very least, doors should be open to all such organizations and countries. The process is underway. If we take the EAEU, its relations with the SCO have already been established. There are similar relations between the SCO and the CIS, the SCO and ASEAN. A network of cross-contacts and connections is already being formed. I am convinced that these processes will make it possible to translate them into achieving real, practical and material benefits for all participants in these processes.
As for whether we fear interaction between Western countries, be it the United States or the European Union, with our neighbors. If we are really talking about equal, mutually beneficial, transparent interaction carried out in accordance with international law, no one can have any fears. If we are talking about the fact that instead of interacting on the principles I have mentioned, Western countries will try to engage in threats, blackmail, force our allies to undermine relations with the Russian Federation to the detriment of their own national interests, we will not hide our attitude to such attempts.
Our Kazakh friends, our other partners in the CSTO, the EAEU and the SCO are well aware of what is at stake.
I thought Lavrov’s reply about the nature of the Soros organization’s reputation showed his usual wit–he didn’t need to overtly say it’s a known subversive group, at least in that part of the world.
Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 11 2023 16:09 utc | 163
|