|
Ukraine Open Thread 2023-53
Only for news & views directly related to the Ukraine conflict.
The current open thread for other issues is here.
Please stick to the topic. Contribute facts. Do not attack other commentators.
Question to you all, what you think preferable:
1) Escalation now, i.e. NATO Boots on the ground, while it appears ill prepared and megalomaniac/ignorant at the same time.
2) Peace talks ending in EU maintaining foothold/direct access up to at least Dnjepr River and giving them 5-10 years for armament and internal socio-economic and political formation, i.e propaganda and repression.
Here’s my take for a start:
I think western outsiders, who proved unable to hold their own governments to account to at least honour Minsk Agreements or to bar them from waging war with Money, guns, Intel, mercenaries etc. have no right to deny the Russian state and people some respite if they want so.
Alas, that kind of respite might lead just to much more misery and suffering for all of us in the end.
Moreover, I think Finance oligarchs (NYC, Chicago London, Paris, Frankfurt) their state bureaucracies (DC, Berlin, Paris, London) plus ideologue’s (DC, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, Harvard, Stanford, Oxbridge, Paris, Berlin) game plan might be to turn Ukraine into an endless war that is un-winable for Russia. Then I dare to observe that big fish are preparing to carefully offload inherently worthless fictitious financial assets to the middle classes. In turn the billionaires accumulate the cash with which they can make a killing on real assets (industrial, real estate, land/resources) bought on the cheap from weaker hands once the inevitable crash (deflation) is triggered.
Throughout this time the powerful might further pursue their green agenda of destruction and ‘reconstruction’ of a broad array of productive capacities, energy-autarchy to the maximum possible degree, green non-tariff protectionism and pauperisation of the masses (e.g. ‘eat the bugs’); all in order to building up MIC capacity that in itself puts downstream pressure on actual consumption (war).
With the notified further EU Integration – that for some spectators already resembles a fourth Reich – this might lead to an eventual direct attempt to eventually dismemberment and conquest of Mother Russia and all its vast human, industrial and natural resources – shall it dare not to implode on its own beforehand.
Still the most irresponsible actors (US State Dpt, England, Poland, Balts, German Greens) set the tone today and might actually prevail inasmuch as they can ‘sleepwalk’ the whole west into scenario 1, i.e. direct and open conflict with Russia.
This most certainly will lead to their and not Russias strategic defeat and thus sending their societies (golden billion) into turmoil, which might even bring the rule of the finance oligarchy itself and most certainly US’s Staus in Europe into jeopardy (we’ve been at that point twice in Germany in the past century). That is why I seriously doubt that the people with real clout will let this easily happen. As the ruling classes are very well aware of the risk it entails they start wars of this nature, as compared to expeditionary ones, only after one cycle of industrial and societal preparation after a crisis and exactly at such a moment before the next crisis would hit (which might in effect jeopardise financial rule anyway, thus the war not adding to that risk). That’s what I read out of the German experience at least.
Anyway I think that all out US involvement is not in the cards for Europe- that would be completely against the most prominent purpose of the whole project which is to set Germany and Russia up against each other, to prevent Europe (4th Reich) from becoming a viable and more independent Western/Christian alternative (for itself and the rest of the world) to a USA that is determinedly on war footing with China. By the way, this has also been one of the objectives of each the Arab spring and all that followed as well as the Euro crisis, in which myopic German and French actor’s greedily sacrificed long term strategic options for short term gains and more direct control (over tiny Greece and Cyprus). However USA is most likely to keep Germany and the rest hooked on its Agenda until the bitter end and even if Germany/EU gains some sort of ‘independence’ after a rupture becomes attainable due to a combination of Ukraine desaster and splits over the China question, this would not mute classical German/EU expansionism towards east and south east but may bring about just a couple of years of detente between them and Russia before the ultimate clash along this too well known historical pattern.
So far my introduction to this intellectual waterhole. On the next occasion I would like to discuss the historical patterns of the contradictions within the EU as well as the social relations inside Germany giving some thoughts especially to the shape and potential of the > 25% national minorities.
Above my analysis-synthesis. I am honestly curious about yours.
Posted by: Arminius17 | Mar 4 2023 16:52 utc | 213
Arminius17,
Good prognostications!
Here’s a response, not as well-conceived as yours.
You conflate populists and elitists. Only what elitists do matters UNLESS populists (the people) are able to protest, vote, organize and actually demand change. This won’t happen. Elitists have hunkered down and, worse yet, have physically weakened people with jabs, viruses, train contaminations, poor food … less food, whatever. They’ve also emotionally and spiritually destroyed a considerable hunk of the West. So, sad to say, what the people think and desire — you call us “outsiders” – doesn’t matter. Our desires won’t be considered or actualized.
Scenario ONE – The war ends in peace talks. Russia dominates behind closed doors and sets the terms – the US/England, in response, creates copious propaganda to save face. Remember, the sickoes in the CIA and State Department, treat the virtual war as if it were as meaningful and important as the real one. For them, propaganda is reality; reality is negotiable and malleable. So, Russia will win the real war and the real peace as the United States and the rest of the West giggle while coming up with feel-good memes and lies.
Have you noticed that Russia produces real leaders and statesmen? And, America … ? I don’t think there’s been a heavy-weight thinker in the United States Congress or White House since I’ve been born. It is simply the case that hardship produces character and Americans are soft, intellectually and, more importantly, in terms of character. For this reason alone, Russia will dominate the next century, perhaps more so than China. Just my opinion.
Scenario TWO – This has to do with finance. Ask yourself, “What do the financial oligarchs get from war? What do they lose?”
More than anything, the EU wants to capture London’s dominance, or past dominance, as the world’s trading hub, and then move it to Paris. There are more English-speaking financiers in Paris, now, than French-speaking ones, or so I have observed. They total about 200k in La Defense and center city Paris. London has about 250k. So Paris is closing in. I don’t see how war helps this transition. Maybe it does, but I don’t see it.
M&As, currencies, banking … Goldman, what do they get out of a long war? Frankly, I think they lose. Traders like to hit that sweet spot between turmoil and placidity. Too much turmoil, the markets roil – too little, trades are small.
You: “I dare to observe that big fish are preparing to carefully offload inherently worthless fictitious financial assets to the middle classes. In turn the billionaires accumulate the cash with which they can make a killing on real assets …”
Good observation! Yes, but … who has the money to buy this shit? Who can buy government bonds and bills? Who is going to buy gyrating stocks? The middle class? No way. It has been gutted. It is in no position to buy fluff. The middle class, in my opinion, will be hunkering down in reality, buying land and practical things, not rehypothecated whatever. Still, yours is an interesting idea. I do agree that the uberwealthy will buy “real” stuff, not so much because they’re trying to screw the middle class (though they’ll do this without flinching), but because they’re protecting their own $$. They’ll be buying farmland in the Dakotas, rental property, smallish companies, stocks that deal with the foundational economy like food, oil, timber and minerals.
Regarding the green agenda, it’s only believers are in the gullible middle class. Greenism has been an oppressive ideology, one that “oligarchs” and “irresponsible actors” have used mostly among the younger and more impressionable, that is, those less grounded in community, faith, family, marriage. If the green ideology protects or enhances the profits of the government class and it’s takers, you betcha they’ll be spouting it. And, greenism has been remarkably effective at gutting, say, farming in Belgium. It’s a tool of oppression. No more.
You: “ … prevail inasmuch as they can ‘sleepwalk’ the whole west into scenario (war) …” They’ve already done this. The propaganda is aimed at disguising the truth which is the West is at war with Russia, and, to a lesser degree, with China/India. I’m certain they thought they’d win easily in Russia and move on to China floating on a rhetorical clouds of victory. Sucks to be Ursala, huh? Not for me, though. I think they’ve already been defeated in the real war, but not the propaganda one.
In my wee opinion, that’s our battle. The propaganda war. We need to fight for the minds of people around us by gutsy truth-telling. Russia will NOT win our propaganda war, only the real one. We must fight this war ourselves.
I’m not sure about your idea that the “most prominent purpose of the whole project is to set Germany and Russia up against each other…” I just don’t know. Europe is anything but Christian. So, it would be more appropriate to call this a Western/Secularist alternative to an Eastern/Christian alternative. There are more Christians in China, now, than in Europe. By far. Ditto Russia. The Orthodox church has been a huge beneficiary of this war. I’m just not smart/knowledgeable enough to comment more. Sorry.
Clearly, the losers are, in order: Ukraine, EU and Europe, English-speaking countries. Within the EU, Germany seems to be the biggest loser, but I’m sure you can speak to this better than I can.
Best,
KR
Posted by: KR | Mar 4 2023 17:53 utc | 225
|