Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 20, 2023
Casino Aficionados Will Have A Busy Day

Warren Buffet:

"Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked."

One large dealer was quoting Credit Suisse bonds at levels that were as much as 6.5 points higher than Friday, according to a person with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private activity in the over-the-counter market.

Holders of Credit Suisse Group AG bonds suffered a historic loss when a takeover by UBS Group AG wiped out about 16 billion Swiss francs ($17.3 billion) worth of risky notes.

The deal will trigger a “complete write-down” of the bank’s additional tier 1 bonds in order to increase core capital, Swiss financial regulator FINMA said in a statement on its website. Meanwhile, the bank’s shareholders are set to receive 3 billion francs.

Pacific Investment Management Co., Invesco Ltd. and BlueBay Funds Management Co. SA were among the many asset managers holding Credit Suisse AT1 notes, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Their holdings may have changed or been sold entirely since their last regulatory filings.

AT1 bonds were introduced in Europe after the global financial crisis to serve as shock absorbers when banks start to fail. They are designed to impose permanent losses on bondholders or be converted into equity if a bank’s capital ratios fall below a predetermined level, effectively propping up its balance sheet and allowing it to stay in business.

HSBC Holdings Plc fell as much as 6.6% in Hong Kong trading, the biggest drop in nearly six months, with its newly issued AT1 bond declining more than 5 cents. Standard Chartered Plc slid as much as 5.6%.

The complete write-down of Credit Suisse’s AT1 debt as part of a Swiss bailout has investors in the $275 billion market scrambling to determine how much protection the notes offer in a crisis.

A $1 billion AT1 bond with a coupon of 4.5% was bid as low as 1 cent on the dollar, Tradeweb pricing showed.

Hong Kong plummeted 2.7 percent, with heavyweight HSBC off nearly six percent on worries about its exposure to risky bonds related to Credit Suisse. Standard Chartered also sank.

The losses came even as the city's de facto central bank said its banking sector had "insignificant" exposure to Credit Suisse.

Other regional bank shares were also hit, including Japan's Mitsubishi UFJ Financial, National Australia Bank and India's ICICI.

London, Frankfurt and Paris all fell in early Monday trade.

Tokyo, Sydney, Seoul and Mumbai were also in the red.

Shanghai rose after the Chinese central bank cut the amount of cash banks must keep in reserve, hoping to boost the country's economy.

Comments

bevin @ 100 “Canadian banks are concerned the fact that they have been, at least for the past century and a half, much better regulated than those in the United States. States.”
Excuse the interjection but who do you think should get the credit for that? The Upper-Canada Tories or the CCF?

Posted by: dh | Mar 22 2023 1:30 utc | 101

@ jinn | Mar 21 2023 23:29 utc | 94
there are too many assumptions in your post @ 92… it is not my purpose to point all of them out to you either…just don’t bother addressing me or including me in your commentary, because your commentary is bullshit… thanks..

Posted by: james | Mar 22 2023 1:33 utc | 102

regardless what gets said about canuck banks – they are all cut from the same cloth, and it ain’t good… we have a central bank – bank of canada – that is beholden to the same financial elites.. we are just as fucked in the long term, because it is one big ponzi scheme that will have to be addressed the next time it implodes – which it will… who was responsible for the run up in asset prices, always claiming inflation was under control? the same gang of thieves, led by the bank of canada.. interest rates could have risen to slow down the housing bubble – but no… same deal with canada here… kleptocracy rules…. this is private finance at its finest, where the ordinary person gets screwed 12 ways to sunday… until we have an actual public banking system – nothing will change…

Posted by: james | Mar 22 2023 1:39 utc | 103

@103 Stock up on baked beans, beaver pelts and wampum. It’s Canada’s only hope.

Posted by: dh | Mar 22 2023 1:45 utc | 104

lol… my wife loves baked beans… no beaver pelts though and i don’t know what wampum is!

Posted by: james | Mar 22 2023 2:12 utc | 105

@105 Wampum is a medium of exchange much used by native American tribes before they got deposit accounts.

Posted by: dh | Mar 22 2023 2:15 utc | 106

About Wampum

Its value derived from its ceremonial importance and the skill involved in making it. In the early 17th century wampum came to be used as money in trade between whites and Indians because of a shortage of European currency.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 22 2023 2:24 utc | 107

@107 Perhaps we should think of wampum as the bitcoin of its day. I wonder if t would be classified as private or public finance.

Posted by: dh | Mar 22 2023 2:48 utc | 108

@100 bevin
Lol, so sorry to keep disturbing your pro-centralizing stance. Was there ever a Monty Python sketch of a dimwit who keeps tugging on Lenin’s coat from below his soapbox interjecting questions that run counter to the Bolshevik message?
That would be me in a nutshell.
Everything I know about Marx I read from Hegel and I found Marx to be bitter, spiteful, and utterly divorced from any knowledge of actual proletarianism.
Are you really going to keep insisting that the truckers’ reactionary moment wasn’t grassroots and that they were all crypto-billionaores now without their own agency.?
What a dreadful eastern-canuck obfuscator you are.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Mar 22 2023 2:51 utc | 109

Everything I know about Marx I read from Hegel and I found Marx to be bitter, spiteful, and utterly divorced from any knowledge of actual proletarianism.
Posted by: NemesisCalling | Mar 22 2023 2:51 utc | 109
———————————————–
You obviously never read Marx or Hegel. Marx had a sharp wit and a keen since of humor. He was Hegel upside down.

Posted by: Ed | Mar 22 2023 4:35 utc | 110

Wouldn’t you feel more at home at the Unz Review?
I note that you refer to Marx’s ‘Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon.’
Perhaps you should read it.
Posted by: bevin | Mar 22 2023 0:54 utc | 100
————————————————
No bevin, the fool can’t read the ‘Eighteenth Brumaire’, he would struggle with the “Manifesto’. And I know the fool has never read Hegel as he claims in a future comment (I am working backwards here). I am seventy years old, and after 40 years of reading Hegel I still struggle. Believe me when I say I had the best support from a top-notch Marxist. For twenty years he was an instructor and mentor, and sadly he passed away last year. Let his name be known, Arthur Shaw. He almost single-handedly led the struggle to divest, first the University of Houston from South Africa, and then the City of Houston as well: He had a top-notch mind.
Bevin, I don’t know what school of Marxism you spring from, and I don’t care. The science must never die, but it must adapt to current events, and that means that new chapters must be written.

Posted by: Ed | Mar 22 2023 5:01 utc | 111

@110 Ed
You don’t have to read all of Hegel to understand Hegel. I will immediately admit that just trying to make heads or tails of the Preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit is nearly impossible…at this point in my own ability to read and within my knowledge of the philosophical lexicon.
As a laborer, I unfortunately was not able to attend a good college for philosophy, so I have to diffuse what I can into a manageable economy of thrift. IOW, my only ability to truly do philosophy is in the little reading I afford myself, the interaction I have here with others and myself through writing, and my own thinking as I toil about as a laborer for 90 hours/week.
Suffice to say, I have developed a unique perspective in learning ad hoc and continually so. And this parralels Hegel’s system quite well, I would say…because he never finished it and in the end towards his death, was looking to amend it further.
I have made the allusion to Jesus Christ as the Logos Incarnate who already happened yet is continually disseminated and reconstructed in His total fullness through the Holy Spirit. My life’s mission at this point, other than warning people about Bolshevism and their great hatred of philosophy, is to reconcile Christianity with Hegel’s concept of the state. It seems my fellow Catholics can not look past Hegel’s Protestantism, and many adherents of Hegel think that you must accept Protestantism to be a Hegelian. I am not satisfied with either of these positions and so I need to keep reading Hegel and dwell in these crypts with these dead men until I come to the answer I know is waiting.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Mar 22 2023 5:42 utc | 112

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Mar 22 2023 5:42 utc | 112
————————————-
Yes! Hegal’s idealism is tedious and hard to read, or even understand. It has been years since I picked up Hegal and read it, but this conversation makes me want to do so now. If you are able to discern much by reading Hegal today, then all the power to you. His ideas about a “World Spirit” have no meaning or importance in today’s modern world.
My question to you is: Did you understand what I meant when I said that Marx’s is Hegal upside down?

Posted by: Ed | Mar 22 2023 7:23 utc | 113

Suisse corpse revealed.
Irishman tries to explain

Posted by: uncle tungsten | Mar 22 2023 8:53 utc | 114

Re: NemesisCalling #112
Your self-study of philosophy is admirable. Yet your attempt to reconcile Hegelianism Idealism with Catholicism will prove futile.
As with many who came before him, Hegel proposed that “the rational alone is real.” Yet we know first principles immediately, and those first principles serve as the basis of rational thought, not the converse.
The school of Realism is exemplified in the epistemology of St. Thomas Aquinas. What is meant by that is simply that human beings are capable of knowing truth. Innately capable. We have the immediate grasp of Being as true and we can intellectually assimilate the “whatness” or quiddity of things. The reality of Being is foremost–we know that we are. We know that the external world exists.
Etienne Gilson in his magnificent work The Unity of Philosophical Experience, points out that Ockham, in asking “What are the Platonic Universals?” ended by believing that our general ideas cannot be mental presentations of any real thing–and so he redefined the terms abstractive and intuitive in a new way, a way that facilitated the breakdown of the medieval school over the next several centuries, which led further to the skepticism of Montaigne, who concluded that a well-trained mind is never convinced of its own opinions and that doubting was therefore the highest mark of wisdom, a severe contradiction in terms.
And then came Descartes, who, in response to Montaigne and admirably so, sought certainty. His thought delineates the transition from the Renaissance to the modern world.
So how did Descartes try to find certainty? He reduced the formal object of the power of knowing, which is truth, to that of a habit of thought–the habit of mathematical logic. Descartes sought to use concepts to understand reality. It is important to stress that logic concerns formal relations between concepts. Concepts must therefore exist in the mind of the thinker before he thinks about the relations between those concepts. So Descartes put the cart before the horse. More than that he applied his method to try to prove the existence of primary concepts, such as Being, through logic.
But Descartes could not accept the primacy of knowing over his primacy of mathematical logic, and his method caused him to end up where he started.
Consider his Cogito ergo sum (I think, therefore I am) which is backwards–we are, and we know that we are, therefore we can think. For as St. Thomas taught in his first article of De Magistro, “there preexist in us the first concepts of the intellect…which the intellect grasps immediately.” Being is indeed the first object to be grasped by the human mind and is the first principle of metaphysics.
Descartes’ mathematical idealism regressed through Hume, who was certain that all reality is uncertain and possibly a mere phantasm of the mind (a remarkably illogical idea when retorted upon itself), who impressed upon Kant the notion that metaphysics is pointless and unable to teach us anything. As Descartes used mathematics, Kant’s thought was heavily influenced by the material progress of science, which dismisses all that cannot be demonstrated as mere idle speculation. Kant tried to free his metaphysics from mathematics but he substituted empirical knowledge, and so replaced the mathematical approach to one of physics, bringing Newtonian methods to philosophy.
Cartesian idealism reduces Man to a thinking substance, while Kantian idealism makes him pure reason limited by his senses. Neither is sufficient in itself, for they both deny first principles–that we know certain things immediately and that they neither need to nor can be proven. And the entire process of the destruction of Thomistic epistemology is analogous to turning a magnificent church such as Notre Dame de Paris into the monstrosity of Corbusier’s Dominican Monastery of La Tourette, the design of which was so divorced from its transcendent purpose that the Order of Preachers removed their friars from it due to depression and thoughts of suicide.
The Hegelian Triad of Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis is simply a further attempt to prove rationally what we already know but which cannot be proven through logic.
Today’s Western culture, perhaps as a result of the insufficiency of reliance on rational thought alone, worships Power. Only power. Coupled with the misuse of modern technology, Western society increasingly offers a dystopian future far worse than the brutalities of the totalitarian regimes of Soviet Russia and the China of both the 1960s Cultural Revolution. The remnants of Magna Carta, written by the Catholic Archbishop of Canterbury, Stephen Langton, are virtually gone. Law itself no longer exists, except as a means of selectively applying power to achieve increasingly centralized control in order to promote ideologies that are utterly inconsistent with the Telos–the Final End–of Man qua Man–who is a creature made by God, meant for eternal happiness with God and for a life here on Earth that will prepare him for that eternal possession of God–and that life is THE GOOD LIFE.
Pick up one or more of Gilson’s works, or go directly to Aquinas.

Posted by: Ciaran | Mar 22 2023 11:40 utc | 115

“…The Upper-Canada Tories or the CCF?” dh@101
Probably the Montreal capitalists. The bourgeoisie likes safe banks and solid capital.
Now I will get back to my solitary violin lamentation of Nemesis’s hard life. And, even sadder, his wrestling with Hegel-in English- though it is a fit punishment for his crimes.

Posted by: bevin | Mar 22 2023 12:04 utc | 116

bevin @116 Heaven forbid Canada should have a stable banking system. It must make life hell for social revolutionaries.

Posted by: dh | Mar 22 2023 13:00 utc | 117

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 22 2023 0:42 utc | 99
It seems like obfuscation to assert that these “deposit institutions” are something other than privately owned and where the profits go instead of sovereign government entities like the state of North Dakota.
_____________________________________________________________
My deposit institution is a credit union so the profits accrue to me while the profits of that SBND go to the state. So yes you are correct.
Contrary to what many people believe there already is total central control of deposit institutions and the deposits in my bank and the deposits of SBND are under that central control.
The discussion was about deposit insurance not deposit profits.
The deposit insurance we now have covers all deposits. That is a fact. Another fact is that all the cost of providing that insurance is paid for by a tax on deposits less than $250K. Only the second fact can realistically be changed by Congress passing new law.
The fact that the large deposits are going to always be covered in full whenever a bank fails is a certainty because in the last 15 years the deposit institutions have become so overloaded with large deposits that if the central monetary authority did not cover them the entire money system would collapse. If you think that will change, or that the majority of Americans will support change that crashes the system and puts 10’s of millions out of work, you are deluding yourself. But even before the deposit institutions got stuffed full of large deposits the Federal Deposit Insurance was was covering large deposits when a bank failed. They are not going to change now.
The fact that only small depositors pay for deposit insurance can easily change. Congress can easily pass law that all deposits be subject to the Deposit Insurance Tax. The consequence of doing that will make the money system much more reliable and cost less for small depositors. Changing the law will take the burden of paying for deposit insurance off the small depositor. And the wealthy will no longer be getting a free ride.
My prediction nothing will change. The wealthy don’t want to pay the tax on deposits and the rest of the people will be fooled into believing they don’t want it to change. The wealthy will continue to get the benefits of deposit insurance without paying for it.

Posted by: jinn | Mar 22 2023 13:26 utc | 118

@115 ciaran
I was remiss to reply to you sooner but my deepest and sincerest thanks for your thoughts on the subject. It warrants a second read and I will try to respond in the next open thread.

Posted by: NemesisCalling | Mar 25 2023 3:32 utc | 119

Further to my @4, @41
Biden in Ottawa. Notable:
1) “It [joint statement] also promised a new one-year joint energy task force, to be chaired by Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and the U.S. special presidential co-ordinator for global infrastructure. The group will focus on renewable energy, electric vehicles, critical minerals and nuclear energy.”
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/watch-live-u-s-president-joe-biden-speaks-before-parliament-1.1900114
2) Biden gifted a “Peace” chocolate bar from Syrian immigrant to Canada, now citizen, chocolatier, entrepreneur
https://globalnews.ca/news/9577226/biden-canada-chocolate-bar-peace-syria/
3) Defence Production Act – Cash for Critical Minerals
“The Pentagon already has told Canadian companies they would be eligible to apply. It has said the cash would arrive as grants, not loans.” interesting use of the term “cash” there, in this context like suitcases of greenbacks… still worth it, one wonders??
“Biden also said Canadian semiconductor projects would be eligible for access to another Defence Production Act program.”
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/critical-minerals-biden-trudeau-1.6790933
4) Zellers, Canadian discount retailer replaced by Target and Walmart, relaunches in a limited way, coincides with Biden’s visit
https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/here-are-the-locations-of-the-first-12-new-zellers-stores-1.6326038
5) Et en français
« Le Canada persiste et signe : pas question de mener une force d’intervention sécuritaire pour stabiliser la situation en Haïti. »
« En cette semaine où les Nations unies ont lancé un avertissement concernant le « risque imminent d’une crise mondiale de l’eau », le Canada annonce qu’il versera 420 millions sur 10 ans pour préserver et restaurer un « trésor national commun » – les Grands Lacs, une source d’eau potable pour 40 millions de personnes. Une annonce saluée par les États-Unis, où la Bipartisan Infrastructure Law prévoit des investissements de 1 milliard pour les activités de nettoyage et de restauration de cet écosystème d’eau douce, le plus grand au monde. »
https://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/politique/2023-03-25/visite-de-joe-biden-au-canada/une-serie-d-initiatives-conjointes.php

Posted by: Bruised Northerner | Mar 25 2023 12:33 utc | 120

Posted by: Bruised Northerner | Mar 25 2023 12:33 utc | 120
Sounds like US is scavenging Canada for minerals to build more weapon factories, etc. They know the writing is on the wall for US dollar ability to buy minerals from outside the west without increasingly negative effects on inflation and implosion of US dollar value.

Posted by: unimperator | Mar 25 2023 12:36 utc | 121

You must be confused, unimperator, Biden says US banks are fine, doesn’t foresee any major crises on the horizon.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-24/biden-says-us-banks-are-in-good-shape-expects-turmoil-will-ease
Just as long as they don’t classify the Great Lakes as “global infrastructure” (you have to prioritize the Washington-spawned-crazy around here)
Speaking of Washington, this is is not going to make the British be any nicer to you, you know.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11898631/Missiles-slam-base-Syria-Iran-backed-militants-retaliate-airstrikes.html
‘Banks are melting,’ warns Elon Musk
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2023/03/23/banks-are-melting-elon-musk-sends-warning-to-joe-biden-and-the-fed-amid-wild-bitcoin-ethereum-and-crypto-price-swings/

Posted by: Bruised Northerner | Mar 25 2023 12:51 utc | 122

Post 4, Bruised Northerner, you are aware that Canadian banks had significant exposure to mortgage backed securities and collateralized debt obligations, yes? And that Canadian banks took bailout money from the U.S.,as well. So Canadian banks got lucky they didn’t have more exposure to the same toxic debt, don’t be naive

Posted by: Madmarc | Mar 26 2023 22:57 utc | 123

@ james | Mar 22 2023 2:12 utc | 105
@ dh | Mar 22 2023 2:15 utc | 106
@ psychiatrist | Mar 22 2023 2:24 utc | 107
@ dh | Mar 22 2023 2:48 utc | 108
Wasn’t the wampum-market inflated and destroyed by Euro wampum-tube manufacture and maybe commercial seamstressing?
Glass beads indeed.

Posted by: John Kennard | Mar 27 2023 21:14 utc | 124