Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 5, 2022
The Twitter Massacre

I am amusing myself with watching the panic some people express over Elon Musk's cleanup of Twitter.

Yesterday 3,700 of its 7,500 workers were fired. That is not good, but the company was losing money and making money is at the core of the capitalist game.

Of interest is what functions were eliminated. The Guardian provides this list:

From news reports and terminated employees’ announcements, here’s what we know so far about the teams that have been hit by the layoffs of thousands of Twitter employees:

  • The human rights team has been laid off, according to a now former employee, Shannon Raj Singh, who said the team worked to protect those at risk in global conflicts, including in Ukraine, Afghanistan and Ethiopia.
  • The ML (machine learning) Ethics, Transparency and Accountability team is gone, according to a tweet of a laid-off manager.
  • The “internet technology team”, which helps keep the site running, has been cut to “a skeleton crew”, two sources told the Times.
  • An accessibly experience engineering team has been cut, according to a laid-off engineering manager.
  • The curation team, responsible for the Moments feature on Twitter, has also been cut, former employees reported.
  • Twitter’s communications department is almost entirely gone, according to the Verge.
  • Other areas that have been heavily impacted, the Verge reported, include product trust and safety, policy, research and social good.

What were these teams actually doing?

The human rights team leader gave some hints:

Shannon Raj Singh @ShannonRSingh – 17:58 UTC · Nov 4, 2022

Yesterday was my last day at Twitter: the entire Human Rights team has been cut from the company.
I am enormously proud of the work we did to implement the UN Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights, to protect those at-risk in global conflicts & crises including Ethiopia, Afghanistan, and Ukraine, and to defend the needs of those particularly at risk of human rights abuse by virtue of their social media presence, such as journalists & human rights defenders.

The human rights team was the 'regime change' force on Twitter. It intervened in conflicts where the U.S. preferred a certain side.

Jerri ☮️ @JerusWorld – 20:42 UTC · Nov 4, 2022
Replying to @ShannonRSingh

So you are the one that was censoring pro-Ethiopian and Eritrean voices in order to help the rebel group from Tigray. May Karma pay you back for thousands of lives perished in US/West proxy war.

Shannon Raj Singh had previously meddled in Afghan and other countries' cultures:

Shannon Raj Singh is a Legal Counsel for SAHR, advising a Kabul-based team on sexual violence litigation in Afghanistan, which aims to end the invasive and discriminatory practice of female virginity testing.

She is an international criminal law attorney focused on victim-centered responses to mass atrocities. Currently based in The Hague, she has experience working with the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and a number of human rights NGOs in sub-Saharan Africa. She has also practiced as a litigator in the United States, appearing in both state and federal courts and assisting with overseas corruption investigations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The machine learning ethics, transparency and accountability team was also fired. Machine learning, also glorified as 'artificial intelligence', is essentially an (often lousy) pattern recognition system. It can be trained with categorized data and, after that, can categorized other data it gets presented. All one needs to know about its ethics, transparency and accountability is is the old IT wisdom 'garbage in garbage out'. If one trains the system with faulty categorized data it will fail to correctly categorize data. It does not need an extra team to learn that.

I do not know what the 'Internet technology team' was doing but the function obviously still exists. It was merely downsized.

The accessibly experience engineering team included at least five members. There task was to modify the Twitter app so it could be used better by people with disabilities. I find it weird that Twitter had a whole team for that. To teach designers to use colors that can be differentiated by color blind people takes about 90 minutes max. All other accessibility issues I can think of (fontsize, button size etc.) are an issue for the device and operation system, not for an application like Twitter that runs on top of those. Besides that, how big is the market of people with disabilities for a company like Twitter?

The 'curation team' ran the Twitter moments feature. It allows for blog posts about specific tweets. The feature never took off. I know of no one who has ever used it.

Many journalists are hostile to Musk's takeover of their favorite hang out. The communications department was there to talk to the press. Why bother?

And the other functions? Product trust and safety, policy, research and social good? What were they actually doing? How has the 'social good' team helped the company to be successful?

The Washington Post laments that Twitter fired some people who were doing 'election information':

The mass layoffs Friday gutted teams devoted to combating election misinformation, adding context to misleading tweets and communicating with journalists, public officials and campaign staff.

The layoffs included a number of people who were scheduled to be on call this weekend and early next week to monitor for signs of foreign disinformation, spam and other problematic content around the election, one former employee told The Washington Post.

'Foreign meddling' is certainly an issue in U.S. elections as foreign money funneled through lobbyists can influence the votes. But 'foreign meddling' on social media is simply a myth promoted by Democrats as part of their great 'Russiagate' fake.

Twitter's downfall into a 'regime change' outlet came in 2009 when it moved a maintenance window to help U.S. 'regime change' efforts in Iran:

The Obama administration says it has tried to avoid words or deeds that could be portrayed as American meddling in Iran’s presidential election and its tumultuous aftermath.

Yet on Monday afternoon, a 27-year-old State Department official, Jared Cohen, e-mailed the social-networking site Twitter with an unusual request: delay scheduled maintenance of its global network, which would have cut off service while Iranians were using Twitter to swap information and inform the outside world about the mushrooming protests around Tehran.

The request, made to a Twitter co-founder, Jack Dorsey, is yet another new-media milestone: the recognition by the United States government that an Internet blogging service that did not exist four years ago has the potential to change history in an ancient Islamic country.

Twitter complied with the request, saying in a blog post on Monday that it put off the upgrade until late Tuesday afternoon — 1:30 a.m. Wednesday in Tehran — because its partners recognized “the role Twitter is currently playing as an important communication tool in Iran.”

That was an expensive mistake. Shortly thereafter Twitter lost access to the Iranian market.

Back to 'regime change' assistant Shannon Raj Singh:

chinahand @chinahand – 18:55 UTC · Nov 4, 2022
Quoting @ShannonRSingh

Somebody should publish the pre Elon org chart. Judging by this twitter walked talked and quacked like an NGO which made it subject to banning in half the world

Twitter had become a 'woke' company that was mostly in the hands of the Democratic Party. By being 'woke' and by supporting 'regime change' efforts Twitter killed its own access to at least half of its potential market.

It Musk manages to make it a more neutral service, nationally and internationally, while keeping its original function alive, I am all for it.

Unfortunately that is unlikely to happen.

Comments

The human rights team has been laid off, according to a now former employee, Shannon Raj Singh, who said the team worked to protect those at risk in global conflicts, including in Ukraine, Afghanistan and Ethiopia.
The ML (machine learning) Ethics, Transparency and Accountability team is gone, according to a tweet of a laid-off manager.
The “internet technology team”, which helps keep the site running, has been cut to “a skeleton crew”, two sources told the Times.
An accessibly experience engineering team has been cut, according to a laid-off engineering manager.
The curation team, responsible for the Moments feature on Twitter, has also been cut, former employees reported.
Twitter’s communications department is almost entirely gone, according to the Verge.
Other areas that have been heavily impacted, the Verge reported, include product trust and safety, policy, research and social good.
What were these teams actually doing?

This matches the exact profile of what I’d imagine a modern intelligence agency and regime change influence operation would comprise. The only thing missing is “wet ops” department …

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Nov 6 2022 7:57 utc | 101

Very good job Elon ! A clear de feat fo the globalists !

Posted by: Coligny | Nov 6 2022 8:04 utc | 102

This matches the exact profile of what I’d imagine a modern intelligence agency and regime change influence operation would comprise. The only thing missing is “wet ops” department …
Posted by: Arch Bungle | Nov 6 2022 7:57 utc | 102
yes exactly, Musk has been groomed for this set up for some time now.
Once you get used to the MO it’s easy to spot.

Posted by: K | Nov 6 2022 8:47 utc | 103

Musk is tasked to turn Twitter into US-version of WeChat, one-stop-surveillance and social credit system, which eventually incorporates CBDC.
Posted by: Tigger | Nov 6 2022 1:14 utc | 84
Sorry to burst your bubble that the negative surveillance of combined western social media far surpasses the data collection of the Chinese government.
Seems the motives are very different too for anyone who is paying attention.
Westerners are endlessly afraid of what might happen all the while its already happened while they were googling, facebooking Insta and tweeting for the past 20 years LOL

Posted by: K | Nov 6 2022 9:08 utc | 104

There’s something exceedingly odd about Musk’s purchase of Twitter, especially at that exorbitant price. That he’s a military industrial complex deep state actor there can be no doubt. Apart from the predictable deep state shenanigans, such as fomenting color revolutions, what is the essence of Twitter if not human communication per se? As such, perhaps it can be a deep state vehicle for studying the latter at the deepest, and why not, most mysterious levels. The philosopher Jacques Derrida believed genuinely but discretely that run of the mill paper correspondence could become impregnated with a sort of psychic energy that was quite literally telepathic. Freud and, if I recall correctly, Wittgenstein stumbled upon similar intuitionist conclusions. Fanciful to be sure, but perhaps Musk has become interested in the uses of Twitter for the real time study of the telepathic potential of online communication.

Posted by: MallardB | Nov 6 2022 10:22 utc | 105

There’s something exceedingly odd about Musk’s purchase of Twitter, especially at that exorbitant price. That he’s a military industrial complex deep state actor there can be no doubt. Apart from the predictable deep state shenanigans, such as fomenting color revolutions, what is the essence of Twitter if not human communication per se? As such, perhaps it can be a deep state vehicle for studying the latter at the deepest, and why not, most mysterious levels. The philosopher Jacques Derrida believed genuinely but discretely that run of the mill paper correspondence could become impregnated with a sort of psychic energy that was quite literally telepathic. Freud and, if I recall correctly, Wittgenstein stumbled upon similar intuitionist conclusions. Fanciful to be sure, but perhaps Musk has become interested in the uses of Twitter for the real time study of the telepathic potential of online communication.

Posted by: Menelaus | Nov 6 2022 10:26 utc | 106

Twitter banned me for two years for refusing to delete a tweet referring to zionist antisemites but unbanned me just in time for the SMO. I lasted for about three weeks and am banned again for refusing to delete a tweet recommending that the US-Ukronazi putschists give up before they are killed. I expect to be unbanned just in tome to tweet that I told you so.

Posted by: Squeeth | Nov 6 2022 10:32 utc | 107

Ref 102. Maybe there were no cuts in the wet-ops Dept? So they don’t get a mention.

Posted by: Guy L’Estrange | Nov 6 2022 10:37 utc | 108

There’s something exceedingly odd about Musk’s purchase of Twitter, especially at that exorbitant price.
Posted by: Ludovic | Nov 6 2022 10:21 utc | 108
Elon Musk now offers one stop shopping for revolution: the Space-X rocket, Starlink internet by satellite, and the Twitter social network.
My prediction: Starlink will offer internet by satellite in places where there is no obvious commercial case to be made, but where the US wants to topple governments. And 500 miles around every Starlink ground station color revolutions will bloom.

Posted by: Passerby | Nov 6 2022 11:24 utc | 109

@5 unimperator | Nov 5 2022 17:34 utc
“… Musk is just temporarily owning it” and
“… Musk, of course, wants to make money, …” (@2)
Musk’s business models are to attract money, not so much make it.
He’s an interesting mix between Zelenski, Ponzi, and Howard Hughes type character, imo.
He’ll prune and quietly flip in due course after extracting some “satelite” app value. Probably got Africa in mind.
I remember the pre-twit varient called “Odeo”.
I don’t use it myself, for obvious privacy reasons.
The timeline has some interesting milestones including “Iraq” (2009) and “Yandex” (2012). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Twitter

Posted by: imo | Nov 6 2022 11:26 utc | 110

Time to migrate to Parler or Signal or Telegram.

Posted by: Exile | Nov 6 2022 11:54 utc | 111

Today on November 6, UkroNazi troops are heavily massing on the Kherson right bank area, as TASS is now reporting.
A similar massing of a Russian counter concentration conceivably, logically, likely may be occurring opposite the UkroNazi forces, though Russia does not and tactically would not be expected to confirm this.They are also a target.
A Nagasaki type strike for which the US is infamous as long as plain history exists would not be any more inconceivable now than when those first two nuclear strikes landed. Those strikes to the shame of its American perpetrators then was aimed at Japan’s ordinary population of men, women and children, not an opposing army as the situation presents itself now.
Give these Ukrainian Neo-Nazi forces and foul masters time enough then depravity will be forthcoming. The Nazis’ animus/utmost spiritual squalor were “facts on the ground,”–an ignominious history criminally spelled out–in 1945.
2022 is no different. Why in heaven’s name would it be? Even if by now by orders of magnitude nuclear weaponry is even more devastating ? But let’s everyone go slowly, hold back, and see what happens.

Posted by: Elmagnostic | Nov 6 2022 12:03 utc | 112

I read what looked like the memo sent to those terminated. They are employed until Feb. 3, 2023 and will get money until then but they are not to come to work.

Posted by: a lurking reader | Nov 6 2022 12:21 utc | 113

Posted by: Elmagnostic | Nov 6 2022 12:03 utc | 115
Funny you mention Nagasaki since this bomb was apparently not authorised by Truman but by USAF on its own initiative. Strange really but not unusual in the US power structure and that too should not be forgotten.
There is a wild assumption that the man in the Oval Office controls everything but when you associate with persons who have close and intimate knowledge of inner workings of US system you find that the President is often unaware of activities – as was the case of Nixon with several adventures in Cambodia

Posted by: Paul Greenwood | Nov 6 2022 12:43 utc | 114

what bothers me about censorship by owners and directors of these social platforms is that censorship is not possible if the platforms were not privately owned.
If the government owned each one of them, then the 1st amendment would apply no matter what ??
Next, is it possible a censoring is a behavior which acquires the status of being a tort? A comment which has meaning to a person somewhere in the intended audience, causes harm to a member in the audience, why does not that censorship acquire the status of being a tort when it causes a harm?
A tort is defined as a behavior which violates a duty that causes harm to a victim? In fact censorship is a device which protects governments and special interest at the expense (denies them access to the knowledge in the speech that was censored) of those who constitute the society or those who oppose or support the special interest. Does the 1st amendment (which enumerates a few inalienable human rights) impose a duty on those who serve in the government to eliminate all forms of communications related censorship? I think it does, The constitution prohibits government from censoring speech..
Congress shall make no law ..that abridges the freedom of speech, ..
seems to me any law that allows or enables speech to be abridged violates the meaning of the first amendment<=my opinion. So if a corporation exist by rule of law (corporate charter granted by a governing power under a rule of law), censorship by private non human entities, violates the first amendment because the law of incorporation enabled the corporation to censor the speech. THIS IS HOW I SEE IT? IANAL, but to me the text of the constitution is clear.. Congress shall make no law ..that abridges the freedom of speech . the word "no" is absolute.. Definition of abridge transitive verb 1: to shorten by omission of words without sacrifice of sense : CONDENSE abridge a novel an abridged dictionary 2: to shorten in duration or extent Tess wished to abridge her visit as much as possible … — Thomas Hardy 3 formal : to reduce in scope : DIMINISH attempts to abridge the right of free speech 4 archaic : DEPRIVE https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abridge
censor means “to remove objectionable parts from” https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/censor
what do you think?

Posted by: snake | Nov 6 2022 12:46 utc | 115

I really want Twitter to come with a default “free speech” mode and an alternative “baby-safe mode” in which more trollish behavior is blocked. If baby-safe mode is the default, that’s a good compromise.
And if they completely get out of the “democracy”-promoting and CIA psyops business – but honestly, don’t you think Musk will just put the Pentagon on a pay-as-you-go plan?
He always plays ball with US paramilitary demands, so far as we know. Why not keep it up, for a reasonable fee?

Posted by: GoFast | Nov 6 2022 12:55 utc | 116

Musk’s profit model is based on government subsidies and contracts. Not sure why anyone thinks he will approach Twitter differently. But then, well, everyone loves a rich guy bearing (promises of) gifts.

Posted by: Tom SteChatte | Nov 6 2022 12:59 utc | 117

I read what looked like the memo sent to those terminated. They are employed until Feb. 3, 2023 and will get money until then but they are not to come to work.
Posted by: a lurking reader | Nov 6 2022 12:21 utc
..
I think California labor law requires that anyone terminated without cause receive 6 months notice with full pay. But kicking them out of the system before the full time period is up is really rare, and if they have time to plan it out they can create conditions for a just cause firing. So I wonder if, aside from purely financial and PR impact of cutting half the headcount, the real goal was to get certain teams completely and totally kicked out of the system before the election and during the lame duck period so the sytem could be used (or shut down) for intelligence purposes? Specificallly I’m thinking here that there may gag orders/non-disclosure agreements around what the intelligence-related teams were doing there, and someone does not want that stuff to be public for the next critical while. A lot of disgruntled people pissed off about losing their means of living may be willing to speak to the media about the propaganda operations, legal consequences of their non-disclosures be damned. If someone knew there was going to be an attempt at peace talks after the election, or a major shift in the propaganda messaging, or something else ‘crazy’ happening, they might be willing to break the nda’s.

Posted by: super extra | Nov 6 2022 14:05 utc | 118

“Musk’s profit model is based on government subsidies and contracts. Not sure why anyone thinks he will approach Twitter differently. ..” Tom SteChatte@117
Read that again, Tom. You’ve answered your own question. If he believes that, nationally and internationally, there are going to be changes among those who make government decisions it makes a lot of sense to signal independence from the current decision makers.
Nationally, Twitter has the reputation of being Biden friendly and anti-Republican. Internationally it has the reputation of distorting debate to the benefit of the US State Department.
Both are, potentially, bad for business. It makes perfect sense-whatever is planned for the future- to ditch a bad reputation from the past.
As to ‘rich men bearing gifts” they tend always to be looking for more riches and are ready to do what is necessary to get them.
Another case in point: those anti-Communist, German industrialists who, according to some observers like Pepe Escobar, are urging their Chancellor to rebuild alliances with China, and seek compromise in Ukraine.

Posted by: bevin | Nov 6 2022 14:34 utc | 119

Well, curiously, this Shannon Raj Singh never said a word about the hundreds of thousandfs of women along their children and elders, being abused, killed and maimed in East Ukraine thorugh the past eight years and currently ongoing, nor she said a word on behalf of the rights of millions of unvaccianted people thoughout the “Collective West” whose basic human and constitutional rights were abused for 3 years in a round…It is funny that he had a role in investigating the Ruanda Genocide ( for what goal, burying evidence on West´s involvement? ) and she does not get involved in the mass media´s, Mille Collines Radio like, performance during the past year launching the hatred and hunting season on the unvaccinated people of “The West”…
All in all, if it were only IT social networks….the ramifications of the NWO go further to infiltrate all aspects of society, inlcuding main Western intelligence services and Papal cavalry orders…You then can find people who intertwin at both…or more venues….
https://www.globalresearch.ca/dark-origins-davos-great-reset/5797113

Posted by: Ghost of Mozgovoy | Nov 6 2022 14:48 utc | 120

Not posting here for a while, my comment was wipped out…I have seen there have been some reparations, wondering whether that includes new rules for posting…

Posted by: Ghost of Mozgovoy | Nov 6 2022 14:52 utc | 121

Yes, “foreign meddling/election interference”. Where 100K or so of Russian troll farm content with nothing to do with actually influencing anything, just generating clicks, is a big deal, but billions upon billions of apartheid state and Gulf head chopper lobbying over the years is just business as usual.

Posted by: muttman | Nov 6 2022 16:30 utc | 122

Twitter cannot be cleaned up. Can it be treated? Perhaps, but there is no cure for Tourette’s Syndrome, which this invention replicates from the range of human behavior. Once a pathological subset. Musk will discover if there are enough eyeballs to entice advertisers when Twitter becomes the uncontrolled expression of every reflexive reaction to the oppression of a capitalist dictatorship or whether there are enough of these pathetic discontents willing to subscribe to this social network so they can wallow in the tics, blurts, and jerks of what has become the typical American response to domination by wealth.

Posted by: Wilikins | Nov 6 2022 16:41 utc | 123

I wonder if that is the game??… “Elon fired the election team from twitter, which in turn allowed Russian meddling in the election, so we can’t accept these results in which the republicans took a super majority in the house, and all future elections are suspended until congress decides they will be safe from meddling.”… ???

Posted by: oldcutlas | Nov 6 2022 16:46 utc | 124

@b
They’re not workers, they’re political activists. You should know better.
Plus, and this has been lost on a lot of people, everyone was shut out of the buildings globally and nothing stopped working. It all kept going.
He could lay off 99% and it would be a better place for it.

Posted by: PalmaSailor | Nov 6 2022 17:18 utc | 125

I became a Musketeer today, “one for all and all for one” kind of purpose. The actions of Master Musk is truly unique in that it has managed to upset the whole democratic party from Potus on down, progressives, censors and the media etc. I believe in that cause for Justice because they have been doing that to any nondemocrat for decades. We can only hope it is the first step in a cycle of change. I for one became a Musketeer today to help serve in that change.

Posted by: Musketeer41610 | Nov 6 2022 17:23 utc | 126

Posted by: Musketeer41610 | Nov 6 2022 17:23 utc | 126

help serve in that change.

Pollyanna, maybe you should give it a few weeks for the deep state to give musk his brief first before declaring a new era in free speech?

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Nov 6 2022 17:56 utc | 127

Who knew that Twitter had a (snicker) “Human Rights Team” as part of its corporate governance?
Too bad that so-called human rights has long ago being hijacked and weaponized by America and the West in general as nothing more than a modern version of the Western Civilizing Mission and White Man’s Burden–a pretext for regime change or destabilization campaigns; economic siege warfare/sanctions; or bombing other countries back to the Stone Age.
Like most social media corporations like Facebook or Google, Twitter is merely a proxy for the American/NATO Military-Intelligence complex.
Human Rights is just the facade that this NATO Military-Intel complex hides behind.
And while Elon Musk is right to fire this “human rights team,” he and his supposed civilian Starlink system have functioned as a proxy for the American military in places like Ukraine, where Starlink has been providing intel to the Ukrainians to kill Russians.
In other words, to hell with Twitter (Musk or no Musk) and the American/NATO Military-Intel complex in general.
How One Spook-Run London College Department is Training the World’s Social Media Managers
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/08/22/how-one-spook-run-london-college-department-is-training-the-worlds-social-media-managers/
Ukraine is using Elon Musk’s Starlink for drone strikes
https://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-is-using-elon-musks-starlink-for-drone-strikes/a-61270528
Russian Space Chief Warns Elon Musk’s Starlink Satellite Network Could Hijack Cruise Missiles
https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/russian-musk-starlink-hijack-missiles

Posted by: ak74 | Nov 6 2022 19:32 utc | 128

Below is a related comment posted on another thread

on yesterdays musk thread. today comes probably something that would give everyone a giggle.
Elon Musk said that journalists who have the pronoun “they / them” in their profile will pay 16 dollars a month for account verification, not eight, since “they” is plural.
LGBT people have never been trolled like this before.
Posted by: hankster | Nov 6 2022 23:13 utc | 92

Posted by: psychohistorian | Nov 6 2022 23:46 utc | 129

“I find it weird that Twitter had a whole team for [accessibility]”
I find weird that you find it weird. Been there, done that. Even plain “software ergonomics” is pretty hard. For the rest, the number of laid off people is like 3000. While I’m not feeling sorry for the human rights team and the others, I don’t think these added together would make anything bigger than a few hundred employees. The accessibility team was around 10 people, including graphics designers. Even if all the regime change and woke stuff is counted at 500, more than 80% of the laid off were ordinary workers. This suspiciously looks like a “normal” downsizing. Musk must’ve realized by now that things wouldn’t be so easy, and this time he wouldn’t be able to bs his way out.

Posted by: nyolci | Nov 7 2022 8:16 utc | 130

this is a good place for debates over how freedom of speech and moderation work together or against each other.
Bernhard has banned users for impersonating others too, though on Twitter it is always distinguishable in principle – in practice a lot of people can be fooled though.
Scale matters. In a small community you can shun trolls for instance, in a large community they can be more destructive. Twitter has small and large communities in a way. When you’re very popular normal interaction becomes impossible.

Posted by: Tuyzentfloot | Nov 7 2022 8:58 utc | 131

a notable polarisation: because Musk belongs to the billionaire class people think that his support for freedom of speech is fake. I don’t think that is how it works. But then I also think Soros really believes in the value of open societies. I think Soros has done a lot of harm but not because his concern for open societies was insincere and not because open societies are bad. More because he’s an humanitarian imperialist, which is the dominant progressive point of view on foreign policy

Posted by: Tuyzentfloot | Nov 7 2022 9:03 utc | 132

Debate moderation: suppression of free speech can happen between participants, not only from above. IT can happen through harassment, trolling, rudeness, diversion , all ways to poison discussion. You can expect a certain resilience against that and have a threshold for intervention, but intervention, while suppressing speech , can have the net effect of improving it.
Two tricky rules are the ‘on topic’ rule and the reputation weight(ranking/boosting). Neither is bad in itself.

Posted by: Tuyzentfloot | Nov 7 2022 9:12 utc | 133

For those of you who think that twitter is another worthless social medium, you are missing its beneficial use massively. Twitter is my news feed. At any given time in my busy life I can check in on twitter and see what my trusted sources – the Aaron Mate’s Glee Greenwald’s Edward Snowden’s – of the world are tweeting about. I can determine if what they are saying warrants further review. They invariable connect to others discussing similar subjects or articles that are pertinent. I use this site in a similar way as I get to hear what many of the very knowledgeable people are saying. I also get to see what the MSM is saying or other mainstream sources are saying and writing about without having to read much of it at all. I have not looked at these sources directly for a 2 decades now. But I don’t have to because I hear much of what they are saying through my trusted sources on twitter. I get small snippets of a Joe Rogan interview and can see if I want to devote a big chunk of my time to his interview of the many interesting people he brings on. Twitter is a truly great resource.
Do I think Musk is connected to the major government agencies and other parts of the billionaire class and corporate elites? Of course I do. That is obvious. He is one of them and benefits from those relationships. What I care about in his takeover of Twitter is will he increase or decrease my access to the great democracy of ideas that twitter was and is. I want to hear what the MSM propagandists are saying about the subjects I care about. I want to see what the Donald Trump’s of the world are saying. Give it all to me and I can sort out what I want to read and investigate further.
I am waiting to see if banned people like Robert Malone, Pepe Escobar, Scott Ritter etc are allowed back on. The re-instatement and then banning of Ritter again is worrisome. We shall see how this sorts out. I hope it is in the direction of more useful information from all sides of the political spectrum. I am a knowledgeable adult and can decide for myself who and what I want to listen to and read. Twitter is an invaluable source for that endeavor
As is this site. Kudos to all the people who post their knowledgeable insights. I learn a ton here as I do from twitter.

Posted by: blaker00 | Nov 7 2022 14:07 utc | 134

Twitter is dead, long live Twitter:
“Considering the multinational corporate relationships already established in this new WEF inspired fascist system,…. and considering that Blackrock and Vanguard are the largest shareholders in most major multinationals…… and considering that Blackrock is embedded in the White House via Tom Donilon…. Watch the multinational corporate advertisers all exit Twitter in an effort to kneecap Elon Musk as they switch to support…. wait for it…. Blue Sky!”
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/11/01/a-data-point-to-understanding-the-dhs-portal-within-twitter-is-found-in-transcript-of-former-ceo-jack-dorsey/
All the Blue Checks are moving to Blue Sky. All of the fired Indians had better get their resumes in the door PDQ.

Posted by: Thirdtwin | Nov 7 2022 14:46 utc | 135

“April 20, 2009: Executives from Twitter and WordPress head over to Iraq to expose the people there to social media and the Internet.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Twitter

Posted by: G77 | Nov 7 2022 17:09 utc | 136

Posted by: MallardB | Nov 6 2022 10:22 utc | 105
Posted by: Menelaus | Nov 6 2022 10:26 utc | 106
2 commenters with the exact same text….

Posted by: Per/Norway | Nov 7 2022 19:11 utc | 137

..half of an oppressive force eliminated = Not sad.

Posted by: truthresonates | Nov 7 2022 23:41 utc | 138

Some context for this post. Jared Cohen co-wrote this “Here is what google can do for US empire” article with Google Ceo Schmidt https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/digital-disruption?page=show
Cohen and Schmidt visited Assange while he was under house arrest in England, and Assange talks about it here https://www.amazon.com/When-Google-Met-Wikileaks/dp/1489080791
The whole visit had an unmistakable “cheeta baby gazelle” vibe to it. Both are worth a read.

Posted by: andyamo | Nov 8 2022 0:42 utc | 139

“but the company was losing money and making money is at the core of the capitalist game.”
The core of the capitalist game is the expectation of profit. Amazon didn’t generate a single penny of profit for its first 20 years of existence, yet it stayed the course because there was an expectation of eventual profit, which came when they created their cloud servers platform.
Musk is getting rid of these people for the reason you stated in the rest of your excellent article: gain control, like a king chopping off the heads of his entire family and friends after gaining the throne. Profits is just an excuse. He’s in it for the long game. Listen to Mark Moss’ YouTube clip on the matter. This man surprised me quite a lot recently. I’ve never seen anyone versed in finance be so lucid of the crimes of the empire. He has also posted a video explaining in detail why the US is behind the terrorist bombing of the pipeline in Germany. Have you ever seen an American in finance talk like this? Refreshing, at last!

Posted by: Melkiades | Nov 8 2022 4:10 utc | 140

The near immediate re-banning of Scott Ritter gives reason to wonder. I tweeted that there could be Platinum and Cobalt checkmarks coming, and my tweet was immediately deleted. Apparently you can be banned for impersonation, what about satire? I’ve decided to add emojis to many posts to be on the safe side…

Posted by: Charles Peterson | Nov 8 2022 5:15 utc | 141

“Banning the perpetrator of an attempted coup is common sense.” <-- Trump Derangement Syndrome freak ranting about his imaginary demons. Moron thinks people attempting a coup, every one of whom has a small arsenal at home, would all forget to bring their guns.
What a total moron.

Posted by: William Gruff | Nov 8 2022 14:44 utc | 142

certain EU and national regulations
Posted by: architect | Nov 5 2022 19:51 utc | 35
Hack the EU into a million pieces and you don’t have to care about its regulations. And make people eat real food, go outside without their phones, and hang the big pharma doctors, and most of those bizarre, pathetic, outlandish “accessibility” issues that people have will be gone.

Posted by: Jusses | Nov 9 2022 16:00 utc | 143

ML is a vast collection techniques and algorithms that goes beyond pattern recognition. For examples, it also includes rule-based systems, reinforcement learning, Monte Carlo methods, etc that can hardly be classified as “pattern matching” systems.
Posted by: d dan | Nov 5 2022 22:49 utc | 65
Jargon dropping. As far as I remember, when I studied AI 25 years ago, all of those methods already existed, and the first thing our lecturer said is that we’re likely to be disappointed, since there’s no intelligence in AI. He was right, and nothing has changed since.
All those fancy excel sheets you list are good for lots of things. When it comes to human behaviour though, AI is primarily good for stalking, torturing, manipulating and controlling people. And mostly sociopaths have any deep interest in it.

Posted by: Jusses | Nov 9 2022 16:53 utc | 144

@RB 78
I know the rates. It’s just that the effective savings are likely to be minimal – and even firing all $200,000 a year employees (c. $100/hour) won’t make that saving. They will need to fire a lot of managers, which organizations are good at resisting, no little due to the fact thatanahrmrnt tends to protect itself by ensuring that firing them tends to lead to very large severance packages.

Posted by: Hermit | Nov 18 2022 21:25 utc | 145