Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 11, 2022
Si tacuisses, …

Russian retreat from Kherson city sets stage for more hard combat
Washington Post – Nov 10, 2022

U.S. Army Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Tuesday night that 20,000 to 30,000 Russian forces remained on the western bank of the river and that it would take time for them to withdraw. But he, too, saw “initial indicators” that the retreat was underway, he said.

“This won’t take them a day or two,” Milley said, speaking at an event at the Economic Club of New York. “This is going to take them days and maybe even weeks to pull those forces south of that river.”

The Ministry of Defense reported on the completion of the withdrawal of troops from Kherson
Kommersant (machine translation) – Nov 11, 2022

The Ministry of Defense reported that at 5:00 Moscow time, the transfer of Russian troops to the left bank of the Dnieper was completed. As the agency clarifies, not a single piece of military equipment and weapons was left on the right bank.

The department reports that the Armed Forces of Ukraine tried at night to disrupt the transportation of civilians and the transfer of troops to the left bank of the Dnieper. River crossings were hit five times by HIMARS rockets.

“All Russian military personnel crossed over, no losses of personnel, weapons, equipment and materiel of the Russian group were allowed,” the Ministry of Defense said.

Comments

I hope you are correct about the Montreaux Convention, but exactly who will prevent the UK or the US from entering the Black Sea if they insist on coming through?
Posted by: Ed Nelson | Nov 11 2022 17:28 utc | 203

Turkey is responsible for the Bosporus Straight and enforcing the rights of passage. The US was not a signatory to the Montreux agreement, but they would not hesitate break it even if they were.
It would push double-dealing Turkey off the fence if they allowed NATO warships through. Russia could consider it a declaration of war.

Posted by: Opport Knocks | Nov 11 2022 17:52 utc | 201

Often the Trolls out due themselves, in a recent thread Yenwoda waxed poetic about the US buying artillery shells from South Korea. Hardly something to brag about, it exposes the US weakness. There was a time
producing ammunition was easy in the US but Industrial America is long gone. Russia can make ammunition.

Posted by: SwissArmyMan | Nov 11 2022 17:53 utc | 202

@bevin | Nov 11 2022 17:42 utc | 211
Yup.
Actually, recall reading the leaked reports of British Army & SF instructors assessments of the UAF troops rotating through training whilst in UK. UAF Morale & motivation was rated ‘Very Low’ overall, and were described as having little to no interest in any instruction apart from ‘First Aid’ & ‘Combat Medic’ training … one wonders why …

Posted by: Outraged | Nov 11 2022 17:54 utc | 203

the Russian leadership seems to be unwilling to really use the power of the Russian military to defeat the Ukronazis.
Posted by: theomimesis | Nov 11 2022 17:36 UTC | 208
First, Putin had to get his countrymen on board, before he could make an effective mobilisation. This isn’t a game of ‘Risk’ where new armies are conjured out of nowhere with a roll of the dice. Russia also has to reserve a large proportion of it’s fully trained military for other eventualities, which would certainly have emerged in short order if it had been fully committed to invading Ukraine.

Posted by: Gt Stroller | Nov 11 2022 17:55 utc | 204

It would push double-dealing Turkey off the fence if they allowed NATO warships through. Russia could consider it a declaration of war.
Posted by: Opportunity Knocks | Nov 11 2022 17:52 UTC | 220
‘Gas hub’ status would be revoked before it got going, for starters.

Posted by: Gt Stroller | Nov 11 2022 17:59 utc | 205

Posted by: Ed Nelson | Nov 11 2022 17:28 utc | 203
if they insist on coming through?
Turkey would insist that they fuck right off.
If they continue insisting it simply takes the sinking of one largish ship to take the problem to a whole new level …
Remember, you’re dealing with Erdogan here, not Scholtz.

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Nov 11 2022 18:00 utc | 206

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Nov 11 2022 17:22 utc | 195
An IAEA update since 8 Oct? You do know, their ISAMZ team is still on site with Rosenergoatom and local Enerhoatom employees? And the “cold shutdown” plan, endorsed by Jake “The Snake” before Grossi’s September visitation? Every other week sumbuddy’s damaging a substation feeding the one “back-up power line” charged, presumably, by the TPP in Ener*odar. Let me help you.
SNAFU w/e 12 Nov

External power has been restored to Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) two days after it lost all access to off-site electricity in the latest incident highlighting the precarious nuclear safety and security situation at Europe’s largest such facility, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said today.
Both the ZNPP’s external power lines, a 750 kilovolt (kV) line and a 330 kV back-up line used for electricity supplies from the grid, were repaired, and reconnection started on Friday afternoon. At around 22:00 the 750 kV power supply to all six units of the ZNPP had been re-established, and the eight operating emergency diesel generators turned off and put into standby mode, Director General Grossi said, citing information he had received from the team of IAEA experts present at the plant.
The 750 kV line is therefore now once again providing the electricity the ZNPP’s six reactors need for cooling and other essential nuclear safety and security functions, including unit 4 which had earlier lost its connection to the 750 kV line in a landmine explosion late last month. The 330 kV external power line to the nearby thermal power plant switchyard is also available to provide back-up power to ZNPP.
This 750 kV line was disconnected from the entire ZNPP site following shelling late on Wednesday and the 330 kV line was also lost just a few hours later, with both sustaining physical damage around 50-60 kilometres from the plant in Ukrainian-controlled territory. The ZNPP’s emergency diesel generators automatically started generating back-up power until external power was restored. At that time, the plant had fuel for around 15 days of diesel generator operations. The IAEA team has been informed that supplies of diesel fuel continue to be delivered to the site, and today plant staff plan to refill the tanks of all the diesel generators.
There is no change in the operational status of all units. …

Posted by: sln2002 | Nov 11 2022 18:01 utc | 207

They already are [in] Kherson, taking selfies and photos with some locals.
Also clown Medvedev appeared today. He said “concept of territorial sovereignty has not disappeared”. Bla bla
Posted by: rk | Nov 11 2022 13:56 utc | 86
Ukraine troops in Kherson taking selfies with “some” locals. This is great news because now the Russian citizens who had to flee from harms way will know who the traitors are. Over a 150. 000 people fled to the left bank of the Dnieper River, the civilians who stayed have opened themselves up to the possibility that they were Ukraine Nazi supporters, and possibly responsible for the death of many Russian citizens in Kherson. They needed to be flushed out, and now they are.
In 2021, the city had an estimated population of 283,649, and according to Wikipedia 45% of the population already fled to Western Ukraine, Europe, or Russia. This means that 156,007 people remained in Kherson. Russia evacuated approximately 150,000 people, which leaves about 6000 Nazi lovers that will never be allowed to betray the Russian people of Kherson again. So, please Ukraine troops, keep snapping those photos and selfies.

Posted by: Ed Nelson | Nov 11 2022 18:02 utc | 208

Posted by: theomimesis | Nov 11 2022 18:00 utc | 227
That’s the most concern trollish troll line I’ve seen in a while.
I hope your contract includes medical and retirement …

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Nov 11 2022 18:06 utc | 209

It is very difficult to obtain the realistic info on the SMO of RF in Ukraine. In the massive hysteria there was the wise post by Old Microbiologist and Karloff1 many posts, explains enough.
I have given up on the Saker, now just an aggregate site, also on Martjanov, he is very boring in his echo chamber, but just regurgitates the tekst of the others. B may be secretive, but I rely on few of you here to give me the facts, karloff etc. thank you, plus b.

Posted by: stranger | Nov 11 2022 18:06 utc | 210

bevin | Nov 11 2022 17:42 utc | 211
In looking at what is occurring, I can only marvel at how easy it is to take people to their destruction. Most only wake up when it is too late. The economic destruction of Europe. The total destruction of Ukraine – How easy was it to turn Ukraine into a Nazi weapon to use against Russia in just eight years.
But all of the west, I have been following what is coming out in scientific medical research on mRNA vaccines. UK actually keeps very good medical stats. Dr John Campbell on youtube is with following on this as he on uses official and scientific reach sources. The deaths and medical costs ill health ect will be immense for the foreseeable future due to US big pharma and their profits.
Just so many fools going to their destruction and now we are going to do to Taiwan and China what we have done to Ukraine and Russia. Russia was at least aware of what was coming and prepared. China will get hit a lot harder. Here in oz the economy is till good, inflation but not as bad as elsewhere, but when we kick off the war with China, Australia will go the way of Europe and UK. Perhaps worse as we will most likely be in direct conflict rather than proxy war. Nobody interested in what is coming. It’s like crossing the road without bothering to look up and check if any cars are coming.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Nov 11 2022 18:08 utc | 211

@aristodemos | Nov 11 2022 16:40 utc | 168

Obviously and evidently your armchair generalship is inadequate in discerning between tactical setbacks and strategic defeat. This war is existential for Russia. Karl den Tolvte of Sweden, Napoleon and Imperial France and Hitler’s Germany won many a tactical victory against the Russians. Ultimately, however, Russia has never been defeated and their will is such that such an outcome is currently unthinkable.

Karl den Tolvte got a bullet in the head in Norway in 1718.

Final outcome: Major and total Russian victory over Nudelman, $oro$ and the rest of the Talmudist schemers.

Yes.

Posted by: Norwegian | Nov 11 2022 18:10 utc | 212

“UK actually keeps very good medical stats.”
(BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA)

Posted by: sln2002 | Nov 11 2022 18:13 utc | 213

Some have suggested that there is a linkage between the US Midterm Election results and the RF decision to pull out of the West Bank of Kherson. … That is, a neo-com / neo-lib continuation policy in Washington DC for the next few years with no hope of change.
Any truth to this?

Posted by: Mummer | Nov 11 2022 18:14 utc | 214

WHERE THE F*&K ARE THE WESTERN MEDIA?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1E4gv0J5PE
I suspect most will be found sitting in front of their makeup artist whilst proof reading their scripts for grammatical errors and watching the camera crew setting up the background video for their ‘live on the ground’ studio shoots; a lot of their avid followers can be found hanging out in a bar in Alabama.

Posted by: kl | Nov 11 2022 18:14 utc | 215

I do not believe the average Russian cares enough bout Ukraine to make the ultimate sacrifice (by the average Russian I do not mean anyone who volunteered for mobilsation)
Posted by: Night Tripper | Nov 11 2022 16:20 utc | 158

If that is indeed the case, then it is a huge problem.
The way things stand at the moment, there will either be no Ukraine, or no Russia. One or the other.
This has become GPW2. Quite literally — you have actual outright Nazis occupying Russian land (and I am not talking about Kherson, the third and fourth most important Russian cities are Odessa and Kiev), backed by the same forces that would have joined Hitler in the fight against the USSR under slightly different circumstances 80 years ago.
If the average Russian doesn’t care about that, Russia is finished.

Posted by: Tbx | Nov 11 2022 18:18 utc | 216

Daily Mail top story:
Putin ‘has been offered surrender terms by the West’ as he loses control of Kherson – and ‘his cronies have reacted positively because it allows them to stay in power and avoid criminal charges’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11417563/Putin-offered-surrender-terms-West-loses-control-Kherson.html
“ Vladimir Putin has been offered surrender terms by the West, a respected Russian policy expert revealed today, as Moscow’s troops were forced to withdraw from the city of Kherson in yet another humiliating defeat.
Professor Valery Solovey, formerly at Moscow’s prestigious Institute of International Relations and who claims to have connections in the Kremlin, said the surrender would see Russia give up all territory in Ukraine with the exception of Crimea, which would become a demilitarised zone and its status would not be discussed again until 2029.
In return, Putin and his cronies would avoid criminal charges over the war and be allowed to remain in power, Professor Solovey claimed.
He said the proposal had been discussed between Kyiv and its Western allies before being presented to Putin’s inner circle – who had reacted positively to the idea.
Russia has been calling for a return to the negotiating table in recent days while there have been suggestions that Washington is quietly leaning on Kyiv to do the same.
General Mark Milley, head of the US general staff, said this week that a winter lull in fighting presents an ‘opportunity’ for talks.
President Zelensky has previously vowed never to negotiate with Russia so long as Putin remains in power.
The news emerged as Ukraine today liberated Kherson after eight months of Russian occupation, with troops greeted as heroes after the last of Putin’s forces fled. Weeping locals sang, danced, hugged, kissed and chanted victory slogans as Kyiv’s soldiers arrived to take back the city – with parties going on into the night.”
Solovey is an interesting character. Born in Luhansk, studied at the LSE in the 90s, looks like a mini Klaus Schwab.

Posted by: Moaobserver | Nov 11 2022 18:18 utc | 217

@Bill Smith 149
Yes, they made a half-hearted effort to take Mykolaiv but I’m talking about the open flatlands, the Steppe. And to take Mykolaiv, why on earth would the Russians think they could hold vast territory and advance at the same time, i.e., why was there no mobilization following well-known rules for the numbers needed to hold territory while also advancing? Something isn’t adding up here. They aren’t idiots, so they had to know they didn’t have the necessary manpower, so why go take Kherson in the first place if they weren’t prepared to hold it and be able to advance? Why would any soldiers even need to be in Kherson if they advanced beyond Kherson?
Posted by: OdessaConnected | Nov 11 2022 16:19 utc | 156

It wasn’t just that, they went further north and briefly captured Voznesensk. The goal being to find a crossing of the Bug. And a crossing of the Bug would be needed to push further west to Odessa. Of course they couldn’t hold Voznesensk either, it was just a few tanks there, not sufficient.
So not only did they push with a few hundred men to take a half-a-million city, then they were going to push even further to take Odessa twice that size? Totally incomprehensible…

Posted by: Tbx | Nov 11 2022 18:19 utc | 218

Ukraine troops in Kherson taking selfies with “some” locals.
Posted by: Ed Nelson | Nov 11 2022 18:02 utc | 231

https://kinokalender.com/_media/filmbilder_gross/1364/Geh-und-Sieh-2.jpg

Posted by: Nobody | Nov 11 2022 18:20 utc | 219

Ukraine is building a wall on the border with Belarus…
https://t.me/intelslava/40906
Is the US indirectly funding it, or did they get Mexico agree to pay for it. Pure comedy gold.
Posted by: Opport Knocks | Nov 11 2022 17:22 utc | 197
Finland is planning to build a 1000+km wall on the border against Russia to stop Putin from sending “a flood of immigrants”. Never mind that he never did, and that foreign criminals cross over freely from Sweden with any weaponry they want, no border checks.
Finland is also considering changing its railway gauge to accommodate the us/nato war machine. That’s nice, the past forty years the only thing they’ve done is to close railway lines and stations in large parts of the country.
A subpopulation of finns is whipping itself into a frenzy for war, saying they’ll go all the way to the urals this time. This is because they want revenge for the soviets taking finnish Carelia. But don’t even try reminding them that it was because Finland joined the nazis in sieging Leningrad. They would get angry at you. And definitely don’t remind them that the “finnish” prime minister who took Finland into that war was a jew and that it’s pretty much the exact same situation now. Only instead of some nostalgic, heroic trawling and skiing in the forest with a rifle on your back, this time it’s one US nuclear missile (of which I’m sure there are already many in the US top secret, above-all-laws warehouses in Finland for years now) taking off, and the results will be seen in less than fifteen minutes.
Finns who don’t belong in the war frenzy group have zero way to get their voice heard, now that the last semi-open online discussion forum was silenced by the false opposition party, the “true finns” (a collection of the most off-putting and genetically mangled individuals you’ll ever see, even by finnish standards).
Finns forget that it was Russia that saved finnish language and culture in a time when elite finns just wanted to be considered swedish, and had mainly disdain for their own history. And as for the fabled finnish “sisu” or guts, that’s for fighting against nature. Felling trees, clearing fields, killing all the wild animals. Finns are natural ass-kissers to anyone they consider authority (such as anyone on TV or any government bureaucrat). Both russians and the famous commander Mannerheim noted that it was almost impossible to make finns actually fight for themselves. The “sisu” story has roots in times, centuries ago, when finnish warriors were in fact some of the fiercest in Europe. Sweden conscripted them and had them all killed in its wars, far away from home. Effective genetic culling.

Posted by: Jusses | Nov 11 2022 18:21 utc | 220

Posted by: Moaobserver | Nov 11 2022 18:18 utc | 244
Nobody in his right mind even looks at the daily mail.
What next? Reptilian shapeshifters?

Posted by: Arch Bungle | Nov 11 2022 18:22 utc | 221

“Russia is losing the war…” Posted by: theomimesis | Nov 11 2022 16:29 utc | 162
How wonderful that the Fifth Column has run away from Russia, mostly to Israel.
The old and bitter Jews Kasparov and Khodorkovsky speak in the same voice with “theomimesis.”
Your loyalty and dedication to Mr.Zelensky – the Jewish Fuehrer of Ukraine and homoerotic dancer in heels – were noted.

Posted by: Cerena | Nov 11 2022 18:28 utc | 222

I feel bad for the ethnic Russians living in Ukraine, because the SMO has made their life worse.
Posted by: theomimesis | Nov 11 2022 18:00 utc | 227

Thank you for sharing your precious feelings with us. Take a chocolate or some ice cream.
There there, everything is gonna be allright…

Posted by: hopehely | Nov 11 2022 18:28 utc | 223

BTW, the allied forces do not “retreat for months”. Next you’ll tell us that after the Donbass, they’ll go straight for Moscow, right?
Posted by: CM of Berlin | Nov 11 2022 17:28 utc | 201
Strange sort of retreat: only a month or so ago annexed over a tenth of the country still – but not for much longer – called Ukraine.
There’s another reason the war needs to drag on. The illegal regime ruling America hell-bent on crashing her polity before resetting a new techno-fascist model is using the Ukraine conflict as cover for what’s coming down on the heads of the people they are ostensibly serving. If the people realized it was their own leaders deliberately causing their country to go down the drain they might be inspired to revolt.
Can’t have that now can we?

Posted by: Scorpion | Nov 11 2022 18:32 utc | 224

Well, I’m sure the Ukrainians are delighted that the Russians were able to complete their pullout very efficiently and without casualties or conflict.

Posted by: Inkan1969 | Nov 11 2022 18:33 utc | 225

“Now that the Russians have acknowledged the Dnieper as a boundary and have blown both the bridges that Ukraine tried to destroy for months, how long before the remainder of the bridges across the Dnieper get the same treatment and the Kiev troops in the East find out for themselves what it is like to have no supply lines.”
Posted by: Pancho Plail | Nov 11 2022 12:21 utc | 47
Do it. Do it NOW!!

Posted by: DakotaRog | Nov 11 2022 18:33 utc | 226

Posted by: theomimesis | Nov 11 2022 18:11 UTC | 237
Shiw you’re not a troll be engaging with the arguments I presented to you in comment 223

Posted by: Gt Stroller | Nov 11 2022 18:34 utc | 227

Nice to see “Tom_UK” show up again!!
I guess you needed some sort of Ukie “victory” to crawl out from under your rock. Good for you!

Posted by: DakotaRog | Nov 11 2022 18:35 utc | 228

Is it true that Russia doesn’t want to properly attack Kiev and Odessa because of their historical links to Russia? If it is, it seems uncharacteristically sentimental to me.

Posted by: D J G | Nov 11 2022 18:35 utc | 229

CNN and other US MSM is showing images of large groups of Ukr troops gathering in the main squares of Kherson. I don’t understand why Russia isn’t shelling these formations now that they’ve pulled out. Unless there is some sort of deal, though that seems doubtful.

Posted by: James C | Nov 11 2022 18:36 utc | 230

too scents @ 217

Timely reading: “How to Pay for the War, Keynes” ==> “>https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/pay-war-6021

I haven’t read that, my economics knowledge is fairly shallow, but I do know Russia has abundant high value resources to sell, directly, through contracts, not as cheap commodities to markets, and it is a country with a large industrialized, educated population, and a sovereign currency. It has very little forex debt, and whether one supports MMT or not it is a fact that you cannot be indebted to yourself. But, you can be indebted to someone else – markets. As is the collective west, from A-Z, top to bottom, through and through.
In Russia the war and the rebuilding is Keynesian (think post WW2 American dream and EU boom) and then think present day western neoliberal catastrophe. Guess which side is going to have to pay the piper and get bled dry economically by this war, during and after? Clue, UK as we speak, higher taxes, high inflation, cutbacks to entitlements and services, all on top of 40 years of wage degradation and previous cut backs. How much blood can you squeeze from a stone?
Maybe that’s why the west is doubling and tripling down on the military side. Maybe they finally figured the self-reinforcing trap of neoliberalism after having handed every aspect of their governments, fiscal policy and money creation, to markets. There is no way out of that trap without destroying their own revered markets.

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 18:37 utc | 231

General Milley is not close to what anyone would consider a philosopher, even when he keeps his mouth shut. Also, very impressive that the Russians were able to get out of dodge in just twenty-four hours without losing their equipment or suffering extensive casualties, a feat which seems to be lost on the .gov trolls crawling through social media bloviating about Ukraine’s ‘big win’.

Posted by: Monos | Nov 11 2022 18:39 utc | 232

Yes, feeling horrible about the torture and murder of innocent people is a good thing. It’s called empathy. That said, lacking such feelings is immoral.
Posted by: theomimesis | Nov 11 2022 18:31 utc | 253

Then go to the church and lit a candle instead of posting nonsense here.

Posted by: hopehely | Nov 11 2022 18:41 utc | 233

I’m sure this is part of a ceasefire agreement with the US. Russia keeps everything up to the Dnepr, and Ukraine keeps it’s only remaining port Odessa. I’m sure Russia also wants some sanctions lifted and resumption of Nordstream.
If so, this would be a good outcome for everyone.

Posted by: grits | Nov 11 2022 18:41 utc | 234

As stated: so basically Ukraine is the West’s new Israel: hyper-militarized–defensively ostensibly–but serving ultimately as a neocolonial battering ram for its designated region of pro-US hegemonic action. Apparently Russia, a la the allied Arab Forces, circa 1967, tried to counter such a growing clear and present danger and the danger is indeed that of it ending up effectively defeated by the new Israel, i.e. the Western neocolonial outpost in the Black Sea/Crimea.
If Russia cannot stem this dynamic it will go the way of the Ottoman empire, or worse, as regards its status as a world power. Everything now hinges on Russia’s ability to defend Crimea and it’s not looking that promising–at best we’re talking Iran vs Israel stalemate here.

Posted by: Ludovic | Nov 11 2022 18:45 utc | 235

As stated: so basically Ukraine is the West’s new Israel: hyper-militarized–defensively ostensibly–but serving ultimately as a neocolonial battering ram for its designated region of pro-US hegemonic action. Apparently Russia, a la the allied Arab Forces, circa 1967, tried to counter such a growing clear and present danger and the danger is indeed that of it ending up effectively defeated by the new Israel, i.e. the Western neocolonial outpost in the Black Sea/Crimea.
If Russia cannot stem this dynamic it will go the way of the Ottoman empire, or worse, as regards its status as a world power. Everything now hinges on Russia’s ability to defend Crimea and it’s not looking that promising–at best we’re talking Iran vs Israel stalemate here.

Posted by: Ludovic | Nov 11 2022 18:45 utc | 236

Wait for it in a week there’ll be stories of Russian troops forgotten behind thousands of prisoners too. The defeat will set the stage for internal unrest in Russia and Putin will do something too little too late to halt it.

Posted by: Neofeudalfuture | Nov 11 2022 18:48 utc | 237

I personally didn’t think the retreat would happen and I wonder if there are still surprises left. Politically, this is very bad for Russia as one must always maintain the support of the people in any war. It also seems strange since Russia was winning every battle in Kherson, with Ukraine suffering 7-8 times the casualties, with favorable winter conditions in the lurch. And the notion that Russian forces couldn’t be resupplied is suspect since they obviously retreated successfully en masse to the east bank of the Dneiper–so why couldn’t they manage a smaller daily resupply effort to the west bank? Mercouris made some good arguments in yesterday’s video, however: 1) There remained the possibility of the Kakhovka dam breaking and Russian troops then becoming truly isolated from their supply routes; and 2) in contrast to the Donbass, the Kherson troops contained some of Russia’s best soldiers, including most of its elite paratrooper brigades, which the Russian general staff wanted desperately to protect. But to anyone seriously believing the Russia is now ready to negotiate in a weakened position, any outcome that does not lead to the unconditional surrender of Ukraine and the rescue of the pro-Russian city of Odessa will be viewed as a DEFEAT not only of Putin and the Russians but of the entire Eurasian alliance, which after 500 years has the imperialist West completely entrapped by its lack of resources, internal divisions, and crumbling geopolitical and economic alliances.

Posted by: FHTEX | Nov 11 2022 18:49 utc | 238

peterAU1@123. possibly—if china has agreed. china & russia (as well as iran) @ this point are working together toward the same agreed goal; to stop the empire & prevent nuclear war. as allies they will never ceed loyalty but work to a win win.

Posted by: emersonreturn | Nov 11 2022 18:53 utc | 239

If so, this would be a good outcome for everyone.
Posted by: grits | Nov 11 2022 18:41 utc | 266
Only for nato. Diaper Joe actually said yesterday there will be no peace until Putin leaves completely from Ukr. That is the demand after Kherson victory.

Posted by: rk | Nov 11 2022 18:55 utc | 240

Maybe that’s why the west is doubling and tripling down on the military side. Maybe they finally figured the self-reinforcing trap of neoliberalism after having handed every aspect of their governments, fiscal policy and money creation, to markets. There is no way out of that trap without destroying their own revered markets.
Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 18:37 utc | 262
Psst, there’s this little thing coming around soon…. Reset they call it…
I loved your earlier comment about how RF-Ch are not out to destroy the West merely get them to back off. Sober, sane point and I hope you are right.
Though I have 2 niggles:
1. Do you think half-measaures will work with the psychopaths running the West? Hard to say, no?
2. Or maybe there is collusion in all this, like there seemed to be both with the biolab corona project and the international ‘quarantine the healthy’ paradigm shift in epidemiological responses. Maybe both sides are collapsing certain elements in their societies so they can ‘reset’ with a system more to their liking, a global system featuring digital currencies linked to digital ID’s and social credit etc. Maybe each side is using the conflict with the other side as cover for the hardship and confusion this switchover involves.
So maybe any collapse will be internally generated by the domestic elites both in China, Russia and the West and all will blame it on the external conflict thereby deflecting blame from themselves.
In which case, the destruction doesn’t have to be complete since domestic press can exagerate the hell of whatever is happening domestically – whilst of course always blaming it on some foreign leader or other – to create a believable and scary enough narrative as to terrify the population into not refusing whatever Reset offer they are made. That old Godfather trick…

Posted by: Scorpion | Nov 11 2022 18:58 utc | 241

grits @ 266

I’m sure this is part of a ceasefire agreement with the US. Russia keeps everything up to the Dnepr, and Ukraine keeps it’s only remaining port Odessa. I’m sure Russia also wants some sanctions lifted and resumption of Nordstream. If so, this would be a good outcome for everyone.

Yes, this is exactly the way out. But it takes two to tango, RF is ready to dance, the West would rather sit in the library with the boys smoking cigars and drinking 100y/o cognac.

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 19:01 utc | 242

General Milley is not close to what anyone would consider a philosopher, even when he keeps his mouth shut. Also, very impressive that the Russians were able to get out of dodge in just twenty-four hours without losing their equipment or suffering extensive casualties, a feat which seems to be lost on the .gov trolls crawling through social media bloviating about Ukraine’s ‘big win’.
Posted by: Monos | Nov 11 2022 18:39 utc | 263

Yeah it is somewhat impressive sure that.
It would be more impressive though if they were able to clear Donbass Zaporozhye Kherson and take Nikolaev, Odessa, Kharkov, Sumi and Chernigov by now.
And the most impressive would be if they were busy building iron curtain on Russia/Polish border while welcoming Gagauz Republic as their new member. Now that would be something.

Posted by: hopehely | Nov 11 2022 19:02 utc | 243

sln2002 | Nov 11 2022 18:13 utc | 238 “(BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA)”
Don’t pull that dumb shit with me when you have never bothered to look.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Nov 11 2022 19:03 utc | 244

Maybe 238 is another username usurper. They alongside the trolls and knuckle draggers get annoying.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Nov 11 2022 19:06 utc | 245

Tbx | Nov 11 2022 18:19 utc | 245
If you had of bothered to look at a map you would have seen the headed to the South Ukraine NPP. All those earlier drives were to capture as many nuclear and biological sites as possible. That is why Russia captured so many documents on US bio weapon research. Russia used to make the fuel rods for the Ukraine NPP’s. After the US takeover they made by Westinghouse in the US. Why was there 30 tons of plutonium and 40 tons of enriched uranium at Zap NPP?

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Nov 11 2022 19:15 utc | 246

Hey St. jimmy please stop filling the threads w off the cuff remarks to any u disagree with. Its just as bad as the dissenting ones. Thanks

Posted by: Tannenhouser | Nov 11 2022 19:19 utc | 247

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIM-23_Hawk
The Pentagon is sending Hawk missiles to Ukraine…………that are 60 years old??? I’m sure they can blow up something with them but seriously?

Posted by: Eighthman | Nov 11 2022 19:21 utc | 248

Posted by: Bill Smith | Nov 11 2022 11:08 utc | 12
You’re wrong, dead wrong. Those are the old vids from Kharkiv region earlier this year.
According to a Chinese post, even the animals are now in the Zoo in Crimea.

Posted by: Chen Laoshi | Nov 11 2022 19:23 utc | 249

Re: Posted by: FieryButMostPeaceful | Nov 11 2022 10:59 utc | 7
The way to prevent that is to defeat the enemy rather than follow a strategy of withdrawal after withdrawal.
————–
Withdrawal after withdrawal, and withdrawal again led to the eventual great victories over France (1812) and Germany(1945)!!!
You’re history blind, or simply dumb?

Posted by: Chen Laoshi | Nov 11 2022 19:33 utc | 250

Here are a few observations… the leader of the united States is a senile pedophile who is up to his ball sack..along with his crackhead incestuous son….in corrupt conflict of interest financial dealings with Ukraine….most of the leadership of Ukraine are Israelis and the current leader banned all opposition parties and media outlets outside of his control…his policy of extrajudicial killings of anyone deemed an enemy of the State Is well documented….many videos circulate of mutilations..torture and murder of POWs… Ukrainian soldiers with trophy Russian skulls and even cooking parts are also apperent. Half a million Ukrainian troops where in the Donbas… behind massive defensive positions built in depth…a few days before Russian intervention on behalf of Lugansk and Donesk militias…these Ukrainian forces started preliminary artillery barrages against the DMZ…the beginning of a spring offensive against the breakaway regions. So a force of 200,000 Russian and Ukrainian militia broke through those defensive positions and pummeled those NATO integrated and trained troops to dust…200 thousand against 1.2 million Ukrainian regular and reserve personal. Russia has been firing about 60 thousand artillery shells per day with Ukraine firing about 4 to 6 thousand…this disparity in firepower a good explanation of disparity in casualties. Whatever the Russian general staff have ready is not going to be advertised for general consumption….but a temporary withdrawal from Kherson City and a relatively small sliver of estuary…river delta…sand dunes and lowlands downstream from 18 cubic kilometers of water contained by dam walls is not a defeat militarily or politically….along that coastal road west past Odessa is a 1000 Abrams MBT with engines running in Romania….. Russia has conducted a low intensity police action with a small expeditionary force against a ethnic blood relative and has not declared an official escalation yet….if Russia declares they mobilized 300 thousand men then it’s 700 thousand and they are poised to take all the lands east of the Dnieper very soon… and NATO will storm east to try and salvage Western Ukraine. The TikTok generation of instant gratification has left a generation of impatient socially inept narcissists btw

Posted by: Joe | Nov 11 2022 19:35 utc | 251

Scorpion @ 276
The Great Reset is a criminal enterprise, want to see how well it will end, watch Scarface. It’s total James Bond Spector shit which in real life if effected would likely destroy all or most of the assets and the architecture that allows those asset to enter the real economy and have actual value as opposed to virtual value, you know, a society around it all. No society, no value.
Maybe that’s why the insiders are buying up hard assets like land, water, and resources but the rich through history always lusted after monopolies. Not saying they are not going to try a Great Reset, but they’ll sink with the rest of us – The Mother Of All Blowbacks.

1. Do you think half-measaures will work with the psychopaths running the West? Hard to say, no?

I keep waiting for the real economy: Nike, Hermes, McDonald’s, Daimler-Benz, Boeing, Ford, Renault, Siemens, Apple, Tesla, TSMC, Samsung, etc etc etc etc etc to get up and punch Blinken in the face. Otherwise, I just don’t know.

2. Or maybe there is collusion in all this

I just can’t imagine China and Russia are into this great reset scifi fantasy. I think they are extremely pragmatic, trying to get through USA Empire dysfunction, resource depletion and global warming sanely, using reasoned, systemic social and economic policy, not looking to genocide their own people. I really don’t think Russia or China sees its population as useless eaters. Modi maybe, Bolsonaro for sure 🙃

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 19:38 utc | 252

Re: Posted by: FieryButMostPeaceful | Nov 11 2022 10:59 utc | 7
Seems you know nothing about how the Soviets retook Kherson WW2!

Posted by: Chen Laoshi | Nov 11 2022 19:40 utc | 253

Does anyone have a remotely credible estimate of how many civilians actually stayed in Kherson to wait for the Ukrainian “liberators”?
In all of this people seem to forget that Russia has held back so much that even early in the operation, Newsweek, a CIA front, damned Putin with faint praise for not just leveling Ukrainian cities with the Russian air force and long range missiles, north and west, which is of course what the Americans would do “shock and awe” style. Russia is clearly demonstrating to the world (outside of the hermetically sealed media bubble we in the West find ourselves in) that they do not wage war as savages like the Anglos and Germans.
To which point, I also question the western casualty figures for the Russian armed forces. 100,000 dead sounds like WWI style trench warfare on steroids. That would be, what, the entirety of the published initial force they deployed? What does the MOD say about this?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 19:49 utc | 254

Pepe Escobar in his Saker article:

At a minimum, the Russians a long time ago should have reinforced their major strategic advantage bridgehead on the west side of the Dnieper so that it could hold – short of a widely forecasted Kakhovka Dam flood. And yet the Russians also ignored the dam bombing threat for months. That spells out terrible planning.
Now Russian forces will have to conquer Kherson all over again.

Exactly as I said – and everyone with a brain can see that is correct.
As he correctly says, this will not alter the outcome of the war (unless, of course, the Russians decide to “negotiate”, which is up in the air at the moment). But the point, I stress again, is that it should not have happened – but it did. Escobar agrees with me on that.
Here’s the real problem as expressed by Pedro:

Well, some sort of deal seems to have been struck between Jake Sullivan and Patrushev.
No one really knows the details, even those with access to flamboyant 5th Column informants in Kiev. But yes – the deal seems to include Kherson. Russia would keep Donbass but not advance towards Kharkov and Odessa. And NATO expansion would be definitely frozen. A minimalist deal.

Hopefully, Pedro is also correct as to his follow-up to the above:

There’s no doubt Moscow will not go along with any of these provisions.
Note that all this coincides with the outcome of the US elections – where the Dems did not exactly lose.
Meanwhile Russia is accumulating more and more gains in the battle for Bakhmut.
There are no illusions whatsoever in Moscow that this crypto-Minsk 3 would be respected by the “non-agreement capable” Empire….
So why are the Americans desperate to offer a deal? Because they may be sensing the next Russian move with the arrival of General Winter should be capable of conclusively winning the war on Moscow’s terms. That would include slamming the Polish border shut via a long arrow move from Belarus downwards. With weaponizing supply lines cut, Kiev’s fate is sealed.

Let’s hope he’s right – and Russia does not “pull defeat from the jaws of victory.” But the Kherson retreat does not engender my trust.

Posted by: Richard Steven Hack | Nov 11 2022 19:50 utc | 255

Many things may be under the table (some are hypothesising that a deal was reached by Sullivan and his Russian peer) that we don’t know.
What seems likely is: Russia has faced not Ukraine, but, to quote someone who put it in an effective fashion, NATO equipment manned by Ukrainians. The Ukrainians have been astutely propagandised to prefer death rather than not giving their life to harming Russia and Russians. The “equipment” is unlimited, like no other country’s can be.
We reach the same time everytime, when the USA are involved. That is, they are the single country in the world allowed to issue an unlimited amount of their currency. Which means being the only country with no limits as to the ability to bribe anyone in the world, to have unlimited equipment/weaponry of any sort, to found and fund and spread “NGO”s and think thanks and organizations for this and associations for that everywhere in the world, as well as other propaganda (read, information by media, and culture-formation by Hollywood and suchlike).
So long as the dollar thing isn’t put an end to, it will not be possible for anyone to defeat them in a confrontation, if we mean a serious defeat in serious confrontation and not what we mean when for instance we speak of their “defeat” in Afghanistan.
So… what comes next?

Posted by: Mihc | Nov 11 2022 19:51 utc | 256

PeterAU1 brought up the 2015 Rand report on China much earlier in the thread (I assume that was the real Peter, not the sock puppeteer).
That is an interesting point especially with the recent lull in activity in Ukraine – perhaps some negotiations are and have already been happening and it’s time to pivot to China.
Which ties in with the Great Reset subject as well, because in the report they talk of global chip and other shortages. If the US were to back Taiwan in a war similar to the one in Ukraine, the US economy would implode, as would several members of the Global South. They seem to be ‘prepping’ us for the ultimate nightmare scenario; one that doesn’t even involve nukes….YET.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 19:53 utc | 257

Scorpion @ 201

It occurred to me this morning that it was to hold the plebiscite to make it part of Mother Russia again. This current movement of forces to more defensible locations is by no means a surrender of the legal status of the territory. Any forces trying to take and hold Kherson are now invading Russia and will at some point suffer the consequences.

It allows Russia by accepted convention to legally declare war. Though of course it’s a bit convoluted and the west would just say it’s stolen land and not Russia proper. But the Russians like to claim legalities, dot i’s and cross t’s, if just to satisfy themselves, before they do things.

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 19:55 utc | 258

Tom Q Collins

Does anyone have a remotely credible estimate of how many civilians actually stayed in Kherson to wait for the Ukrainian “liberators”?

About 150k of the Kherson population stayed.

Posted by: Zanon | Nov 11 2022 20:00 utc | 259

https://kherson-news.ru/politics/2022/11/11/65207.html
Machine translation.
Putin’s Kherson Idea Revealed

The newly elected British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, speech in the House of Commons of Parliament, May 13, 1940: “I have nothing to offer you but blood, toil, tears and sweat. We have a tough test ahead of us. We have many long months of struggle and suffering ahead of us.”
President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin , speech at the Valdai Club, October 27, 2022: “We are standing at a historic turn, ahead of probably the most dangerous, unpredictable and at the same time important decade since the end of World War II.”
And this week, Russia saw a clear example of the unpredictability and the dangers that await it ahead: the withdrawal of Russian troops to the left bank of the Dnieper near Kherson.
Am I trying to reverse events, using the October words of the President of the Russian Federation to explain what happened in November? Such an interpretation is, of course, possible. However, I would like to note that it was not I, but Vladimir Putin himself, who started “reversing events” first.
One of the most misunderstood episodes in the modern history of Russia is the admission of new regions to the Russian Federation on September 29, 2022. The change in the borders of states as a result of a special military operation is, despite the novelty of the term “NVO”, a fairly standard event in world history. But usually in such situations, new territories are first taken under full control and only then are included in the state.
Why, in the situation that was in September, did Putin make a conscious decision to change the usual course of action? There can be only one explanation: the GDP has drawn yet another red line – but not for the West, as we are used to, but for itself and all of Russia. The new borders of the country, which even before the current Kherson situation existed in theory, and not in practice, this, according to Putin, is the minimum acceptable result that the NWO can end with. Until this result is achieved, the CBO will not end. In the meantime, the special operation continues, any tactical maneuvers are possible within its framework, including those that do not look particularly rosy from a PR point of view.
This is what Vladimir Putin’s long-term political strategy looks like at the moment. And here is another important feature of this strategy: no one is allowed to be a greater “patriot of the NVO” than Putin himself.
In recent months, the system of the Russian vertical in some places has seen an unusually high level of, let me put it this way, political pluralism. I will name only two names: Ramzan Kadyrov and Yevgeny Prigozhin. But such pluralism in Putin’s eyes is acceptable and permissible only when it comes to the actions of individual subordinate figures in the system. When it comes to the general line, the consolidated decision of the supreme power, completely different norms and rules apply.
Ramzan Kadyrov in the Telegram channel: “I completely agree with Mr. Prigozhin’s opinion on Surovikin’s decision. Yevgeny Viktorovich very accurately noted that Surovikin saved a thousand soldiers who were in actual encirclement … So there is no need to talk about the “surrender” of Kherson. “Surrender” together with the fighters. And Surovikin protects the soldier and takes a more advantageous strategic position – convenient, safe.
Soon after the start of the JMD in Russia, there was a complete defeat of that part of the political spectrum that openly opposed the idea of ​​a special operation. Now, if necessary, another similar defeat can occur in the country – those who believe that it is possible to be more resolutely anti-Western than the fighter against the hegemony of the West, who now occupies the main office in the Kremlin.
Here is a very revealing quote from an article by Pyotr Akopov “After Kherson, Russia will have to answer the damned question of its history” on the RIA Novosti website: “Now there is another exacerbation of pseudo-patriotic hysteria. It covers a small part of society, but this is not good either. Moreover, there is a threat that in the event of defeats at the front, in combination with some next statement about negotiations, the neurosis will spread to the broad masses, that is, it will begin to threaten the main condition for our victory: popular unity in trust in the supreme power.
Pay special attention to this wording: “The main condition for our victory” is absolute and unconditional “trust in the supreme power.” Whoever thinks differently is de facto working for the enemy. And how in Russia they deal with “enemies” during that existential test for the country, which is the NWO, is well known.
Another quote from an article by Petr Akopov that explains a lot: “Putin will never agree to a “shameful peace” either with Ukraine or with the West. On February 24 this year, a historic choice was made, the Rubicon was crossed, after which Russia can only move forward. Stumbling, making mistakes, missing blows, concentrating, even temporarily retreating tactically, but strategically moving only forward.
In other words, particulars are not important. The overall strategic picture is important, which, as follows from Putin’s statement at the Valdai Forum, will gradually, painfully, but at the same time consistently take shape over the next ten years.
And no, I am not implying that the NWO will last until the 1930s. The statement of the GDP, in my opinion, should be understood differently: the period that will come after the completion of the NWO will be no less difficult, dangerous and unpredictable than the period of the special operation itself.
But let’s not get too far into the future. Let’s return to the present, in which Dmitry Peskov just made a number of important, but, it seems to me, not at all unexpected statements: “The Kremlin does not consider the withdrawal from Kherson and the redeployment of troops to the left bank of the Dnieper humiliating.” Or here’s another: “This is a subject of the Russian Federation. This subject is legally fixed, defined. There are no and cannot be any changes here,” Peskov said, answering journalists’ questions about whether Russia continues to consider the entire Kherson region its territory and whether it will legally prescribe the status of the right-bank part.
A summary of all of the above: as the Kremlin is convinced, Kherson “is not counted until autumn.” Kherson can be “counted” only after the end of the NWO. Until then, wait and trust. Putin is confident that he is on the right track.

Apologies if this has already been posted.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 20:09 utc | 260

Tom_Q_Collins and all
I have pulled a Foreign Policy article from behind the paywall and posted it at my VK account. Have bolded sections – deter = newspeak for war and sanctions, plus the devastating affect the Taiwan war will have on the economies of South East Asia. Basically it knocks out all the competitors to the failing US economy. Already US is drumming up a sanctions from hell package. I think it is a very important read at this stage.
https://vk.com/@739151204-the-coming-war-on-china
US is not as fearful of getting into direct conflict with China as it is with Russia.
Rand “War with China – Thinking through the unthinkable”. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1100/RR1140/RAND_RR1140.pdf

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Nov 11 2022 20:09 utc | 261

Posted by: Zanon | Nov 11 2022 20:00 utc | 264
What is the source for this?

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 20:10 utc | 262

It allows Russia by accepted convention to legally declare war. Though of course it’s a bit convoluted and the west would just say it’s stolen land and not Russia proper. But the Russians like to claim legalities, dot i’s and cross t’s, if just to satisfy themselves, before they do things.
Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 19:55 utc | 265
I expect they left a note pinned to the Kherson town entrance sign:
“You can’t come in here, it’s ours. We’ve just nipped over the river to take a piss, but we’ll be back.”

Posted by: Gt Stroller | Nov 11 2022 20:12 utc | 263

Kherson city is now empty of civilians.
Keiv is in lying mode again as its hollywood trained media crew concoct the usual bullshit propoganda to create the narrative for the western audience.

Posted by: HERMIUS | Nov 11 2022 20:12 utc | 264

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Nov 11 2022 19:03 utc | 280
oh. yes. I have. ibn scanning primary source “medical” (clinical, you mean?) data, “epidemiological” data, “peer-reviewed” clinical and mRNA chem-trail data, and candidate EUA Phase wtf data since China uploaded Sars-CoV-2 sequence into GenBank 7 Jan 2020 and through 2 years of BoJo NPI “herd immunity,” “pool testing,” and “excess death” bio-stat magical efficacy inferences. I even watched a couple John Campbell, Phd, episodes (before he advanced his eugenic Asian natural immunity theory) because he did a decent job explaining molecular bio to folks considering ivermectin. And let me tell you, I am not the most skeptical UKHSA booster-morbidity-and-mortality report reader to surf the innerboobs. That title goes to BMJ pros, the semi-pro title goes to rank’n’file NHS nurses, and the incensed amateur title goes to Off-Guardian.

Posted by: sln2002 | Nov 11 2022 20:14 utc | 265

Gt Stroller @ 268

I expect they left a note pinned to the Kherson town entrance sign: “You can’t come in here, it’s ours. We’ve just nipped over the river to take a piss, but we’ll be back.”

They just might have.

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 20:15 utc | 266

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 19:55 utc | 263
“It allows Russia by accepted convention to legally declare war.”
Which is pointless at this time. Russia could have declared war back when Ukraine was shelling Belgorod and sending helicopters there to blow stuff up.
Russia mobilizing only 300,000 troops indicates it has no intention of “declaring war” at this time. “Real” mobilization would entail mobilizing one to two million reservists (assuming the reported estimates are real, which, like everything else in this conflict, I begin to doubt, along with Martyanov’s claim of “20 million reserves.”)
Besides, as I’ve argued all along, Russia doesn’t need “real” mobilization unless and until the US and NATO commit a half million troops to Russia’s borders. Russia can – if it has the will and wants to take the time – take all of Ukraine with the initial SMO forces. Of course, it will be easier with an additional 300,000 – and it would be easier still with a million. It just matters how you do it and how much time you want to take to do it – and the latter is dependent on your economy, your population’s will, and your political will. The latter two get threatened if you continually retreat, no matter how strategic the retreat.
As I said before, it is physically impossible for Russia to lose this war. But Russia can lose for psychological reasons, both on the part of the politicians and the population. All of which leads to the advice of “quit screwing around – declare war and finish it effectively.”

Posted by: Richard Steven Hack | Nov 11 2022 20:18 utc | 267

Here is my favorite find at clinicaltrials.gov, w/o July 2021

Posted by: sln2002 | Nov 11 2022 20:18 utc | 268

PeterAU1 – Thanks for the links.
Posted by: HERMIUS | Nov 11 2022 20:12 utc | 269
Unfortunately I don’t think it’s true that no civilians remained in Kherson. I cannot verify the location in the video (Telegram link below), but if that is Kherson a significant number of civilians of all ages are purported to be greeting returning Ukie troops (driving Kias, LOL) and singing songs with the Ukie flag draped over themselves. Looks like at least a couple hundred people to me.
Just FYI – https://t.me/suspilnenews/15644

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 20:19 utc | 269

Tom_Q_Collins
“Over 115,000 civilians wishing to flee Kherson Region evacuated, Russian commander reports ”
https://tass.com/politics/1534431
There live about 290k in Kherson so actually more than 150k stayed (if the numbers are right).

Posted by: Zanon | Nov 11 2022 20:19 utc | 270

Nobody destroyed USA from outside. It was your own disfuntional society. A disgusting, immoral country full of racism , homeless, gun and crime, drug addicts, lack of education, healthcare, inflation, prices etc. Thank the Zionist rulers for that.
But, there is a reason why they now cry for negotiations. It is because a severe beating is coming. Forget all the propaganda or die with it.
The rest of the Russian army is reserved for USA and NATO as well as the weapons that Putin said:. “you ain’t seen nothing yet”!

Posted by: Karl luck | Nov 11 2022 20:19 utc | 271

So Russia is saying it prefers to save a few hundred soldiers, and will abandon people who supported it, to the death squads.
This is what happened in Kharkiv, and now again in Kherson.
There is this feeling that Russia does not take this thing seriously.
It will soon be hunted by NATO, as it deserves. When it had the opportunity, Mr Putin was busy making sure he does not offend the United Nations (which BTW accuses Russia of supplying viagra to it’s soldiers so they can rape babies).

Posted by: nothing but the trut | Nov 11 2022 20:22 utc | 272

Richard Steven Hack @ 272

Which is pointless at this time. Russia could have declared war back when Ukraine was shelling Belgorod and sending helicopters there to blow stuff up.

I never said at this time, I just said it gives them the legal basis. If they ever decide to it’s just a matter of filing the forms.

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 20:24 utc | 273

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Nov 11 2022 20:09 utc | 266
To discuss in more detail, I do not see any way that the US economy would survive – short to mid term – the scenario(s) posited by RAND et. al. As I surmised – prior to reading your link – the economies of numerous Global South (including SE Asia) would suffer tremendously. But the USA does not have the manufacturing capacity and none on the horizon either, to “benefit” from such conditions elsewhere. The American citizen consumer would see empty store shelves, hyperinflation and energy shortages (for many reasons). I imagine that last part would be exacerbated by the greedy US energy firms deciding to sell their petro products at a premium on the global market while gouging Americans at home.
I’ll read your VK analysis and the RAND report as I have a chance and will revisit the topic with you in future Open Threads when possible.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 20:24 utc | 274

Zelensky blocks media from entering Kherson (“for the time being”).
https://lenta.ru/news/2022/11/11/hrss/
I’m sure they’re going to need some time to stage the “atrocities” committed by the Russians and come up with the catchy headlines to feed to their willing western media patrons.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 20:29 utc | 275

In the 1960s, department store and office building elevators had laundered music playing in them. It was called Muzak.
Now, when I turn on the TV I get laundered News. Or as I like to call it – Newzak.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Nov 11 2022 20:30 utc | 276

[222] @Tbx
The only conclusion I can draw from this is that the Russians didn’t think the Ukrainians would fight.

Posted by: Bill Smith | Nov 11 2022 20:30 utc | 277

@Eighthman | Nov 11 2022 19:21 utc | 271
It is far worse than that. Never once used in combat by US forces, retired & mothballed over 2 decades ago. The UAF would require extensive training to man them, then acquire competence and effectiveness re operational deployment. The missiles recalled from mothballing will have actually been manufactured between ~30-40 years ago. They are a lethal hazard to the operators without even considering to dare fire one. They will have to be refurbished/re-manufactured before shipment to UAF, which is close to the cost and time to actually manufacture new. My understanding is that is what the Pentagon has commenced by offering contracts to do so.
The latest shipment of donated 155mm artillery shells ~21,000 will in pre Feb24 daily fire rates, be exhausted in ~3 days.
Worn out Hummvees (~100) scavenged from training facilities, workshop repair are supposed to substitute for the now wholesale destruction of the now virtually non-existant IFVs & APCs that the UAF started with Feb24.
Most importantly, the UAF has not been supplied with spare parts and service/technical support for any of this junk ‘donated’ going back to Mar24. Not even wheel rims or spare tires, let alone tread for tracked vehs. So whenever they break a track, or it’s damaged/destroyed by RF fires on ’60’s era M113s, UK tracked APCs, etc, they are abandoned. When wheeled APC’s & Military offroad vehs dating back to the ’60’s, Saxons, Bushmasters, LandRovers, M117s, etc, get a tire spike, or are shredded by Arty splinters, they have no spare rims, nor tires, and they are abandoned.
UAF have no service support or tech specialists able to perform even the most perfunctory user/operator maintenance.
UAF has lost since 24Feb the entire approximate equivalent of the standing militaries of NATO members Germany, France & Italy combined in terms of Ground force arms/equipment and air assets. Think on that.
Hence the desperate resort to ‘Technicals’, armed pickup trucks and simply commercial passenger cars in lieu of IFVs/APCs over the past months. They can do basic maintenance/repairs and cannibalize parts from civil society, for a time, as well as serial smuggling of such into Ukraine.
Essentially there are no more Soviet era Tanks, T-55s-T72s left anywhere the Empire has working relations to ship anymore. IIRC ~45 Slovak/Cheznian ‘modernized’ T-55’s have been rounded up, but are in such derelict condition the Netherlands is essentially rebuilding them at a rate of ~10/mth before on-forwarding.
The 30+ year old Soviet era Air Defence assets has been annihilated and Empire has nothing to supply without stripping it’s own standing militaries.
Would estimate UAF operable tanks likely number less than 100(?) throughout the theatre, as they have only been able to support increasingly feeble failing daily direct attacks along the contact line, that in recent (last two months) cases are as small as 1 tank in support, coupla APC’s with a ‘scratch’ infantry force of two composite companies and a bunch of ‘technicals’ civilian cars.
The coming UAF collapse of its armed forces will be sudden, rapid & catastrophic …
Just saying …

Posted by: Outraged | Nov 11 2022 20:33 utc | 278

The childishness of some comments is becoming astounding – sildenafil to rape babies? How low can one fall? Lucifer himself would disdain this – or no Margarita would ever made a pact with him, but that will be too far over the heads of these extremely primitive trolls…I guess some trolling can add spice to the blog, but there are limits…And please, the expression “echo chamber” is certainly taken from a troll handbook, so please stop using it…adult conversation is doing quite fine without any trolls as catalysts, thank you…

Posted by: Anthony | Nov 11 2022 20:34 utc | 279

Posted by: Anthony | Nov 11 2022 20:34 utc | 284
https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-soldiers-supplied-with-viagra-to-rape-ukrainians-un-official-2022-10
Sorry to see you’re so easily offended, but did you really put claims that Russian soldiers are given Viagra to rape children past the mouthpieces of NATO at the UN? Come on, have you been hiding under a rock for 33 years? You do recall the claims of Iraqis throwing Kuwaiti babies out of incubators, do you not?
And to the point, here’s a blurb from the Business Insider article above.

Last month, UN investigators concluded in a report that Russian troops have raped children — some as young as four years old.

So yes, the idiots are claiming that Russian troops have raped babes.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 20:43 utc | 280

[283] “It is far worse than that”
Why would the Hawks take any longer to train on than the other non-man portable anti-aircraft systems Ukraine has trained on and deployed since this started? I would guess the Hawks are an attempt to address the drones.
“The coming UAF collapse of its armed forces will be sudden, rapid & catastrophic …”
Will this be, (in your opinion) in a month? In 6 months? In a year?

Posted by: Bill Smith | Nov 11 2022 20:43 utc | 281

Hoarsewhisperer @ 281

In the 1960s, department store and office building elevators had laundered music playing in them. It was called Muzak. Now, when I turn on the TV I get laundered News. Or as I like to call it – Newzak.

‼️ – So good I’m stealing it. Post it on the internet and it’s public domain!

Posted by: LightYearsFromHome | Nov 11 2022 20:45 utc | 282

“Of course, it is very difficult for us to leave our homes, but we understand that this is a forced, temporary measure. We really hope that in two or three months we will return to our homes, to Kherson. The left bank has been fortified, there is now a lot of equipment and personal Therefore, I would like to say to those who hoped that there was some kind of Ukronazi victory: we are leaving Kherson only to regroup, we now have a very heavily fortified left bank, so the Ukranazis have no chance, “said Serhiy Moroz.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 20:46 utc | 283

No surprises here. The pro-Ukrainian crowd predicted this weeks and months ago while the pro-Russians denied it would happen. Keep the pro-Russians’ record in mind when listening to their next denials.

Posted by: James Grip | Nov 11 2022 20:48 utc | 284

Posted by: Flying Dutchman | Nov 11 2022 12:32 utc | 55
—————-
A Chinese blogger already pointed out Kherson was a big trap at strategic level layed by the Ukies and the collective West. And Russia did a fantastic job by pulling out a wonderin a very organized and successful withdrawal.
Just answer one question: if the Ukies blows up the huge dam, how Russia can handle the concequences?
So stop your over-blown imagnation, and listen to some words from the Oriental wisdom. We Chinese are bystanders, and we certainly see most of the game.

Posted by: Chen Laoshi | Nov 11 2022 20:52 utc | 285

In retrospect, holding Kherson without Mikolaiv was always untenable. However, this demonstrates the value of the Dneiper as a strategic barrier. Russian holdings on the left bank are readily sustainable.
If I were formulating Russia’s next move, I would retake Kharkiv, then build a line of defense through Poltava to Kremenchuk, isolating Dnipro and perhaps capturing the northern part of the city and/or the eastern part of Zaphorizia, attacking from the direction of Donetsk.
Alternatively, less ambitiously, forego Poltava and make Kharkiv-Dnipro the line of defense (which would be shorter line than through Poltava).
Russia is still winning the grand-strategy game, but some fresh definable success on the field would be desirable to shore up international support and dampen internal doubts.

Posted by: Figleaf23 | Nov 11 2022 21:00 utc | 286

No surprises here. The pro-Ukrainian crowd predicted this weeks and months ago while the pro-Russians denied it would happen. Keep the pro-Russians’ record in mind when listening to their next denials.
Posted by: James Grip | Nov 11 2022 20:48 utc | 289

There are no pro-Ukrainians here. Just a bunch of Americans and British who do not care if most military age Ukrainian men get killed fighting a country that their political and media class has convinced are the embodiment of evil. As a bonus they might get a Ukrainian bride mail order catalogue.
Any pro-Ukrainian would have said this could have been sensibly settled via Minsk II, 7 years ago.

Posted by: Opport Knocks | Nov 11 2022 21:03 utc | 287

They seem to have zeroed in on two particular vessels with all transponders turned off near the sites.
Wired reports on the ongoing investigation of the Nordstream explosions.
https://www.wired.com/story/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-dark-ships/

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Nov 11 2022 21:03 utc | 288

@285
Indeed they fall that low.
On the other hand, little helpers of the USA such as ISIS really have been doing things ugly as that. With the silent approval of the saints in the White House. I repeat, the hypocrisy of the Wsst is its most disgusting aspect. So, the whole idea of catholic upbringing, imbibing us with a guilt complex, comes to fruit doesn’t it? From the sixties onwards, all our protests seem to have been in vain and people only got more gullible.
When they start to demonise the “adversary”, as they have been doing since last year, you know they are guilty as hell.

Posted by: anthony | Nov 11 2022 21:09 utc | 289

There is only 1 question in the end: On whose side is time?
I had thought it was on the side of Russia at one point. I thought this because this is primarily an industrial and economic war and Russia had the ability to inflict economic pain in the form of higher energy prices. This, I thought some time ago, would create political pressure to end the war in the west. You could argue you were seeing the emergence of some of this on the American right.
I no longer think that. Oil prices went to 120 but have since fallen. In the near term the problem is near catastrophic for Europe – but as time passes their ability to identify energy substitutes increases. The Democrats survived the mid-terms and the calculus in the Senate is more supportive of Ukraine than is Biden.
World War 2 and the US Civil War were decided by the relative industrial strength of the powers. This is the number that matters:
US Budget (pre-Covid): 4.5 Trillion
US Support for Ukraine: 40 Billion
This is less than 1% of the US Budget. The US is more than capable of replacing what supplies are used simply by starting lines that Russia cannot attack. Add European aid into this equation and support for the Ukraine is immaterial from a financial perspective. Failing an economic collapse of the West – which is incredibly unlikely – the advantage is with Ukraine.
I see no prospect the UAF will not be fully supported with equipment.
You of course need men to fight, and Russia has an advantage. But how much of this is real? I don’t think very much. In part because I don’t think equip additional men. Ukraine is defending its own territory.
Putin knew all of this – which is why this is the best comment here: “The only conclusion I can draw from this is that the Russians didn’t think the Ukrainians would fight” I would add I don’t think the AMERICANS thought they would either.
I don’t know how this ends. What is apparent is Russia lacks the firepower to impose its will in the way that they thought they could. It was a stupid fucking war – and NATO will now be on Russia’s northern border in Finland as a result. IF the fear was encirclement they are now more encircled than they were at the start.

Posted by: NoWar | Nov 11 2022 21:09 utc | 290

Posted by: Zanon | Nov 11 2022 13:04 utc | 70
———-
How did Iran and DPRK survive for so many years, and are still getting stronger ?
As the world’s undisputed leader in terms of providing necessities to other countries, Russia with its unmatchable natural resources and strong industrial basis, will definitely outlast the collective West in a prolongedd war, or unarmed confrontation, period.
No one here, except the like of you, believe your nonsense.

Posted by: Chen Laoshi | Nov 11 2022 21:09 utc | 291

Posted by: Karl luck | Nov 11 2022 20:19 utc | 276
This guy knows what up.

Posted by: who cares | Nov 11 2022 21:10 utc | 292

@ Opport Knocks | Nov 11 2022 17:52 utc | 205 b. & others
…if they allowed NATO warships through. Russia could consider it a declaration of war.
Exactly. Turkye is not playing stupid there.
But further onto Kherson positioning or a pull-out, few interesting points could be made.
I would be keen to really look at the bigger and slightly pessimistic picture, upping the ante on the global conflict, enrolling here.
To me this pull-out looks rather ideal as a strong defence position to wait for any serious NATO/US attempt to officially enter Ukraine in any shape or form be it protective force or a ‘peacekeeping’ attempt from Romania direction.
From what I understand, China and Russia are fighting NATO/US together, so maybe RF can rest a bit on a South while China provokes a Taiwan situation a bit more.
I imagine it as a huge manoeuvre pre-warfare, one pokes here, the other there.
US simply cannot cope efficiently with these manoeuvres simultaneously.
While NATO/US and its media are focused on a Kherson basin – it is a big deal, true, but is anyone looking at what is going on in the East?
Artemovsk’s resistance will fall to pieces real soon, Soledar will be liberated, Avdeivka overrun too, Kramatorsk, Slavjansk approached, Izyum probably as well.
This ends the Ukrainian military as a viable force, and creates a buffer for Donetsk.
Any official NATO/US involvement will prompt RF to close Black Sea,
down any drones/AWACS flying over it, and probably go full ninja on their assets and infrastructure.
As for the current posts running circles here on this respectable forum/bar – many overestimated Russia as according to Hollywood, but nobody should underestimate Russia.

Posted by: whirlX | Nov 11 2022 21:12 utc | 293

@123 and 110
“I think you’re right about being able to hold the Kherson bridgehead even if the dam was blown. The flooding would only last a few days to a week at most, depending on how much damage was done to the dam. I believe US is about to pull its support for Ukraine specially in terms of weapons supplies. There had been articles in US media in the preceding weeks about sending the limited US weapon supply to Taiwan. I think the deal involves Russia giving up the bridgehead which gives the west a propaganda win, then the US cutting weapons supplies which will be redirected to Taiwan and then standing back while Russia clears the Donbas.”
That makes the most sense of all the scenarios

Posted by: canuck | Nov 11 2022 21:13 utc | 294

Bill Smith @ 282. The Ukrainians were armed to the teeth since 2014 and is the Best and largest fighting force in Europe.
They would have been defeated already were it not for massive supplies of military from all of the West.
In addition, thousands of mercenaries from all over including terrorists, so everyone can boast about USA/NATO, but think for 1 second how powerful your Jew run USA is? Always paying/ bribing people to fight their wars.
During the Korean war, 100,000 Chinese came over a mountain and routed McArthur (your hero). Today, missiles will blow you all to hell, but ignorance is Bliss.
This is not years as MSM propaganda instructed you, for calling for negotiations is the key. Who is now calling for it? One day war will take years, next day call for negotiations. Go and watch Jew Hollywood fantasies. It was designed for the dumbdowned and illiterate.

Posted by: Karl luck | Nov 11 2022 21:16 utc | 295

Wikipedia
“As of 25 May 2022, the Ukrainian authorities estimated that 45% of its inhabitants had fled the city”.
Now then, the population before the conflict according to the UN, was approx 283,000.
That means the population before Russia evacuated civilians was approx 155,000.
What the lying Ukies on here would have us believe is that the russians only evacuated 5,000 civilians.
Dear dear….more lies lol

Posted by: HERMIUS | Nov 11 2022 21:16 utc | 296

@295
you are pretty naive if you think that
1. The USA really has that money – they only have debt.
2. NATO would not have invited Finland without the war in Ukraine. NATO would have done this anyhow and the Russians knew this quite well.
3. The West won’t collapse. Well, I live in a small Western European country and we have no African colony left, no serious industry, hardly any natural resources. Essentially, we are living in a soap bubble. Come and join us and share our future poverty. Any village in far Siberia will seem like heaven.

Posted by: Anthony | Nov 11 2022 21:19 utc | 297

1. I think the Souther pincer was overly successful for Russia being able to cross the Dnjepr, keep in mind the Southern pincer split towards Kherson and Melitopol. When the Russians crossed the Dnjepr, they just kept moving and were only stopped – overstreched – at the gates of Nikolaev. At that point they should have withdrawn, when they realized Nikolaev and Odessa were out of reach. The bridgehead was only crucial, if Russia had enough forces to move towards Odessa. But since they didnt, the bridgehead was a liability. Had the Russians been as successful with their Northern pincer, the war would have been over after 2 weeks. Only in the South Ukraine put up minimum resistance or none at all.
2. If no further deal was made than to negotiate a Russian withdrawl from Kherson and the war drags on, I wonder what the Russians plan with their forces in Belarus. The fastest way to end the conflict would be to secure the Polish border and stop the inflow of weapons from Poland. But that would be a big arrow move and Surovikin said in his presser he wouldnt do that. So what are the next steps by Russian?`Keep grinding on to kill the entire Ukrainian male population that is willingly being led to the slaughterhouse by NATO and Z? If Russia is out to destroy the EU they will drag it out as much as possible, because the West has to put up the money for Ukraine while the EU’s economy is imploding.

Posted by: Arne Hartmann | Nov 11 2022 21:21 utc | 298

@Bill Smith | Nov 11 2022 20:43 utc | 286
UAF would have to have existing AD personnel (many currently ‘unemployed’) ‘re-trained’ to operate the MIM23 systems, which are alien in concept, design, operation, engagement & command to their knowledge & experience of Pre ’90 Soviet AD systems. Base competency, followed by actual operational effectiveness with the AD ‘Systems’, which cannot be easily integrated into their existing AD remnants and C&C commands. Months to be minimally effective in uncoordinated and isolated independent batteries. Of course the pre-requisite is them first be re-manufactured/refurbished and shipped.
Virtually useless against modern Aircraft/Helos, thing Vietnam era NVA S2s. Less than worthless against RF drones in theater, maybe an older cruise missile with luck. Unique profile signature, low mobility, makes ’em juicy targets.
Foreign Wunderwaffen Arty, MBRLS, even mortars across multiple calibers are not much more than scrap without … rounds to fire … ie ammunition.
Will this be, (in your opinion) in a month? In 6 months? In a year?
Respectfully a ‘How long is a piece of string question’. However, UAF & RF both get a vote, IMV the RF will determine the when at their leisure re grand strategy.
Explanatory context/background:
Consider the current situ not much different, in the context I’m discussing, to the sudden unexpected catastrophic collapse of the South Vietnamese ARVN in the ’75 Spring offensive …
NVA assessed their big push would take ~2 years hard campaigning (IIRC) … Empire expected much longer … NVA tanks entered the Presidential compound and the US Embassy ~100 days later as the last Hueys were taking off. Not unlike the Afghan proxy would hold out against the Taliban for 90+ days according to Empire, 48 hours later they were the flight left Kabul airport.
Primarily re similar symptoms, degradation of junior Officer & NCO morale/experience/effectiveness re continual unsustainable losses, hence lack of unit cohesion, combat effectiveness, tactical ability and willingness to accept yet further serial casualties. Matched with aircraft & combat systems ‘materiel’ (all kinds) they could no longer replace re losses, use, maintain, or get spare parts for.
ARVN tankers in M48s put up a valiant fight till they literally ran out of tank shells, and logistical support to supply ’em, same with last of their Arty. (Note: IIRC)

Posted by: Outraged | Nov 11 2022 21:26 utc | 299

Therefore it is quite obvious that Russia has already lost the war. No other interpretation makes sense.
Posted by: Jay | Nov 11 2022 13:54 utc | 84
Therefore it is quite obvious that Russia has already lost the war. No other interpretation makes sense.
————
If the librated land had a mouth, it wound say “No“!

Posted by: Chen Laoshi | Nov 11 2022 21:29 utc | 300