Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 18, 2022
Slanted Reporting Can Lead To Bad Foreign Policies

When reading this New York Times piece about economic growth in China one might come away with the impression that the country is trending towards a recession.


bigger

China’s Economy Is Slowing, a Worrying Sign for the World
Economic output climbed 4 percent in the last quarter of 2021, slowing from the previous quarter. Growth has faltered as home buyers and consumers become cautious.

BEIJING — Construction and property sales have slumped. Small businesses have shut because of rising costs and weak sales. Debt-laden local governments are cutting the pay of civil servants.

China’s economy slowed markedly in the final months of last year as government measures to limit real estate speculation hurt other sectors as well. Lockdowns and travel restrictions to contain the coronavirus also dented consumer spending. Stringent regulations on everything from internet businesses to after-school tutoring companies have set off a wave of layoffs.

China’s National Bureau of Statistics said Monday that economic output from October through December was only 4 percent higher than during the same period a year earlier. That was a deceleration from the 4.9 percent growth in the third quarter, July through September.

The world’s demand for consumer electronics, furniture and other home comforts during the pandemic has produced record-setting exports for China, preventing its growth from stalling.

Note all the negative attributes sprinkled into nearly every sentence. China's economy must be in really bad shape.

Up to that point the piece has not mentioned its core data point – which is sensationally good and should have been in the headline.

That follows only now, after the reader has been sufficiently prepared to think it is actually bad. The sensationally good data point gets immediately dampened with another negative sentence.

Over all of last year, China’s economic output was 8.1 percent higher than in 2020, the government said. But much of the growth was in the first half of last year.

8.1% growth, after 2.3% growth in Covid 2020 seems excellent to me. It is beyond the 6% target the government had set and higher than previous estimates. For China it is the fastest growth rate in a decade.



bigger

Overall the decades the GDP growth trend in China is moving down. This is normal for societies without population growth when they come near to their upper economic potential. In one or two decades China is likely to have consistent growth rates of around 2 to 4% with small recessions sprinkled in every now and then.

For now China's Central Bank is pushing for even higher growth:

China will open its monetary policy toolbox wider to maintain the stability of total credit, Liu Guoqiang, a deputy governor of the People's Bank of China (PBC), the country's central bank, said on Tuesday, vowing to roll out more pro-stability policies until the downward pressure on the economy is fundamentally eased.

In a fresh easing move, the PBC on Monday lowered the rate on seven-day reverse repurchase agreements by 10 basis points (bps) to 2.1 percent and cut the interest rate on the one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) to 2.85 percent from 2.95 percent.

The reduction in the two key policy rates was the first in about two years.

Moreover, according to Liu, commercial banks will submit optimal quotations for the loan prime rate (LPR) on Thursday. The LPR, the de facto benchmark lending rate, is updated on the 20th of every month, which falls on Thursday this time.

Unlike the 'western' central banks which printed money and lowered rates to under 0% to save their financial markets, China still has ways and means to expand its economy. Its building sector is overindebted and a bit shaky but will not be allowed to come crashing down.

The NYT tends to write in a negative tone about the economies of all perceived U.S. 'enemies'. It is a huge mistake as it leads to delusions in U.S. politicians and leaders.

When former Senator John McCain called Russia 'a gas station masquerading as a country' he demonstrated the effects of such indoctrination.

Russia is the worlds fourth biggest electricity producer directly behind the much bigger China, United States and India. It is number five in global steel production with only 2% less output than the United States. Its official GDP numbers in U.S. dollar look lower than Italy's. But an estimated one third of Russia's economy is running informal and off the books and, corrected for that, its GDP at purchase power parity is bigger than Germany's.

Readers of the New York Times and other U.S. media do not learn such things. That is why they underestimate what they are up to when they push for conflict with Russia or China. The lack of real knowledge about the world is what creates bad foreign policies.

 

Comments

China GDP growth during COVID of 2.3% and 8.1% – an average of 5.2%
US GDP growth 2020 -3.5% and forecast to rise 5.6% in 2021 – an average of 1.05%
EU GDP growth 2020 -6.1% and forecast to rise 4.2% in 2021 – an average of -0.95%
Japan GDP growth 2020 -4.8% and forecast to rise 1.8% in 2021 – an average of -1.5%
P.S. Russia GDP was -3% in 2020 and 4.3% in 2021 – an average of 1.15%, easily beating the EU and Japan and even just better than the US.
I think that the US and EU 2021 forecasts are a little bit high given the latest data for Q4 (retail sales, car sales), but even the above is very telling. China got a growth jump on its main competitors over 2020 and 2021 of 4+% vs. the US, 6+% vs. the EU and nearly 7% vs. Japan. EU and Japanese GDP has pretty much stagnated for the past decade and may well continue to do the same as China continues to grow at 5% for the next decade.
The underlying story is the continued faster growth in China vs. the West, with the Chinese economy becoming equal (on a PPP basis) to that of the US+EU+Japan around 2030. One also has to take into account that the Chinese economy is much more oriented around actually producing things rather than “producing” rentier financial returns and bullshit that is counted as GDP (e.g. the US sick care sector). Together with the Chinese dominance of many of the new technology sectors this will drive large geopolitical and geoeconomics changes this decade.
2022 forecasts: China 5%; US 3.5%; EU 4.3%; Russia 2.5%, before returning to trend growth rates (i.e. EU and Russia relatively slow, US a little bit faster, China with a 3% yearly advantage compounding over the years).

Posted by: Roger | Jan 18 2022 19:01 utc | 1

the US mindset is governed by Lawyers and Accountants. This mindset rests upon the belief that Reality is mind borne. Ie. Faith and Belief are the cornerstones of Reality, not Objective Material Evidence. If enough people believe something, then it becomes Reality. Hence the delusional, wishful thinking reporting.

Posted by: mijj | Jan 18 2022 19:02 utc | 2

Peng sue, uighur genocide… they keep repeating the same lies to make it fact
Well the nazi’s lost and goebles killed himself and his entire family so let’s see what happens now.

Posted by: A.z | Jan 18 2022 19:10 utc | 3

The NYT is a tad bit negative but fair. China’s economy has been slowing down in the last two quarters and 2022 will be challenging with the need to keep on lowering debt levels while GDP growth is kept above 5%.
I think you should spend more time on the astonishingly biased stuff and not this kind of stuff. Peng Shuai has been mentioned in the NYT around 100 times in the last 3 months. In the last 3 months during the Maxwell trial and after her conviction, has Bill Clinton been mentioned as linked to the girls who were sex trafficked by Maxwell? It’s the best proof I’ve come across last year that the NYT is corrupt and a tool of ruling class and US foreign policy interests.

Posted by: crumble | Jan 18 2022 19:13 utc | 4

I agree with mijj @2 that these headlines reflect required delusional thinking to keep order within the empire. Inasmuch as did so much of our economy are financial services, which are primarily parasitic, and employ the most well off, it’s a tactic that allows the plates to keep spinning, and well paid propagandists gainfully employed.
The problem is that much of the corruption is becoming too apparent. It seems a lot like the Soviet Union in its collapse.

Posted by: Michael.j | Jan 18 2022 19:27 utc | 5

– There is a saying “There are lies, bad lies and statistics”. That applies to (almost) every country and also companies. But the chinese statistics are notoriously unreliable. What I do know is that China has a Debt-to-GDP ratio that’s well above the same ratio for the US and the UK.

Posted by: Willy2 | Jan 18 2022 19:34 utc | 6

Now you know.
NYT can not be relied upon for objectivity.

Posted by: IronForge | Jan 18 2022 19:41 utc | 7

thanks b…. i don’t want to get stuck in some alternative universe as prescribed by the nyt, wapo or any of these usa centric media outlets… nyt has been making a gradual transition to the prvada of the usa… why try to stop it?? why bother?? let them continue to indoctrinate anyone stupid enough to bother reading them! don’t try to fight stupidity… humour is more fun.. see my example below..
the only thing missing here is having the poster hoyeru tell us what a pussy putin is for letting all this happen!

Posted by: james | Jan 18 2022 19:42 utc | 8

b. you are preaching to the choir

Posted by: ld | Jan 18 2022 19:58 utc | 9

The Chinese have a nickname for the likes of gordon chang, the North American bureau chief of China’s strategic foolyou agency. Thanks to their China collapse theory over the last two decades that the country has been able to keep its exponential growth under the radar, or what Deng Xiaoping called ‘laying low and bidding your time’. Stories on the New York Times should be taken as entertainment rather than news.

Posted by: Cindy6 | Jan 18 2022 20:04 utc | 10

In 2020, the FIRE sector accounted for 22.3% of US GDP, while manufacturing was only 10.8%. FIRE was the largest single sector by a factor of 2. Therein lies a large piece of the story of why America is declining as an economic power.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/248004/percentage-added-to-the-us-gdp-by-industry/

Posted by: Rob | Jan 18 2022 20:08 utc | 11

There is also the point that China shifted to a “war footing” last year, with the crackdown on real estate, videogames and the tech giants and so on. Yet still achieved this impressive performance.
As for statistics, here is one.
The defence budget for Russia is about the same size as the defence budget for the UK.
I wonder who would win in a fight.

Posted by: John Cleary | Jan 18 2022 20:12 utc | 12

The US media is a massive disinformation campaign designed to serve the ends of empire. Making China (and pretty much everyone else) look like a failed state is supposed to make us appreciate the great U$A – despite declining life spans, health care managed by corporate death panels, never ending wars, rampant inflation largely due to monopolistic price gouging, a government that has utterly failed the citizenry, astronomical wealth disparity, infinite money in politics, imminent civil war, etc., etc., etc.
See how bad they have it in China!

Posted by: Black Cloud | Jan 18 2022 20:50 utc | 13

@Rob, #11:
I’m surprised that healthcare is only part of the education and social services sector, and their combined share is only 8.6% of GDP. Years ago I’ve heard that as a nation we spend 17-18% of GDP on healthcare. These figures don’t jive.
And legal services are nowhere to be seen? I suppose it is imbedded into every other sector. The so-called legal expenditure is the most corrupt and wasteful economic activity of our society. We have one of the most unjust, most cumbersome, and least responsive system for resolving conflicts in the world, not to mention the intentional time lags between indictment and prosecution for criminals to wiggle and bribe their way out of incrimination 90+% of the time.
Seeing these figures reminds me of the cliche: figures don’t lie; liar figures.

Posted by: Oriental Voice | Jan 18 2022 20:50 utc | 14

In other words media is not driving policy, rather it is driving citizens to support policy.

Posted by: Black Cloud | Jan 18 2022 20:52 utc | 15

The lack of real knowledge about the world is what creates bad foreign policies.
The vast majority of NYT and perhaps to a lesser extent WaPo readers have no power to direct foreign or domestic policy, as demonstrated by the Princeton (or Yale?) study from a few years ago that more than one MoA regular has posted here and there.
The NYT and again, to a lesser extent, the WaPo have been around a long long time and by now it’s obvious what function they serve. Namely the following: Deflect for Wall Street crimes, Proselytize the up and coming PMC to accept Western imperial narratives as fact and therefore normalize (and launder) the pro-war messaging of the MISC (s is for surveillance) so that the PMC and those with whom that class has influence won’t notice that both candidates in any given election have the same basic worldview and that real choice doesn’t exist. This also serves to turn the regular guy plebes off from voting at all, so it’s a win-win.
In short, it’s simply imperial capitalist class propaganda directed inward at the professional managerial voting class so that they speak and vote in-line with directives in a self-amplifying and self-perpetuating feedback loop.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 18 2022 20:56 utc | 16

@ ld 9
b. you are preaching to the choir
Why sort of church do you go to? It’s not preaching, it’s a factual exposition — big difference. Requires thinking.

Posted by: Don Bacon | Jan 18 2022 20:59 utc | 17

@ Oriental Voice | Jan 18 2022 20:50 utc | 14.. i wonder if the legal expenditures is caught in the professional and business services window of robs link @11? that forms the 2nd largest % in that graph/link… i guess we need a further breakdown of what these categories include…

Posted by: james | Jan 18 2022 21:12 utc | 18

I should’ve been more clear in my post at 16. SOME readers of the NYT and WaPo DO have sway over foreign and domestic policy because they’re politicians, members of the aristocracy/plutocracy (of the USA) or both. So it’s also propaganda directed inward at them, and it’s very effective as demonstrated by their past coverage of the Bolsheviks, Nazi Germany, the USSR/Stalin/Holodomor, the Korean Peninsula, Vietnam and of course Bush/Iraq, Obama and Trump. They’re telling the owners and managers of the country what they want them to think and do. As many if not MoA readers also know, the NYT runs any foreign policy stories by Pentagram and SeeEyeAye censors prior to publication.
From wiki, how familiar does this look?
In 1920, Walter Lippmann and Charles Merz investigated the coverage of the Russian Revolution by The New York Times from 1917 to 1920. Their findings, published as a supplement of The New Republic, concluded that The New York Times’ reporting was neither unbiased nor accurate, adding that the newspaper’s news stories were not based on facts but “were determined by the hopes of the men who made up the news organizations.” Lippmann and Merz alleged that the newspaper referred to events that had not taken place, atrocities that did not exist, and that it reported no fewer than 91 times that the Bolshevik regime was on the verge of collapse. “The news about Russia is an example of what people wanted to see, not what happened,” Lippmann and Merz wrote. “The main censor and the main propagandist was the hope and fear in the minds of reporters and editors.”
Here’s the somewhat watered down list in its entirety.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_controversies_involving_The_New_York_Times

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 18 2022 21:16 utc | 19

The recent health problems have tested China but the country is moving on the right direction domestically and internationally.
domestically–

Rather than copying capitalist systems like that of the United States, the Chinese government has sought to create a system that, through various formal and informal channels, promotes connectivity between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and nominally private Chinese enterprises. China’s leadership understands the challenges facing SOEs in being innovative and has built systems to address them. The push toward a state capitalist system—one in which ostensibly private Chinese firms compete alongside traditional SOEs—has put new and innovative Chinese companies on the global stage. The private firms Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent have managed to compete globally with multinational corporations in new and emerging high-tech fields by balancing state backing with private sector innovation and resources. Similarly, biotech giant BGI has managed to dominate the genetic sequencing industry via private investment and government subsidies and support. . .here

internationally–

The largest trade agreement in the world, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), comprising 15 nations (but not India nor the US) will lower tariffs for member economies that represent one third of the world’s GDP. The defining trait of this mega trade agreement is a recommitment to supply chain trade with lenient rules of origin that allow the cumulation of value across all members to qualify for tariff preferences. Intra-Asian trade and further coupling with the Chinese economy are in store. . . .here

Posted by: Don Bacon | Jan 18 2022 21:17 utc | 20

How about “you’re kickin in open doors”

Posted by: blueswede | Jan 18 2022 21:26 utc | 21

How about “you’re kickin in open doors”
Posted by: blueswede | Jan 18 2022 21:26 utc | 21
I like that turn of phrase, but even if it’s preaching to the choir or kicking in open doors, they’re choirs and doors that need to be preached to and kicked in respectively. It has to be documented and analyzed publicly. When it comes to any USUK reporting on Russia, China, Cuba, Iran, etc. I always check with MoA and FAIR.org first.
I still remember the day I ran into rabid anti-Assadist Louis Proyect in the Salon.com comments section and cited a MoA article which was as usual very well sourced and linked. His only response was that “Moon of Alabama is anti-Semetic” (the conversation wasn’t about Israel or Jews). I spent a few hours scouring through MoA archives and could find nothing, save one or two comments under stories to back up this assertion. so I knew then that b was making the right people uncomfortable enough to tell blatant slanderous lies and that the establishment DOES notice what gets said here.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 18 2022 21:39 utc | 22

Re ‘Slanted Reporting’ — when was the last time when you heard or read the ‘news leaders’- the NYT, Wapo, CNN. NBC; etc,etc – mention the Minsk Protocol?

Posted by: chet380 | Jan 18 2022 21:54 utc | 23

Meanwhile, not a word about the continuing decline in the Outlaw US Empire’s GDP or the ongoing biggest financial crime ever. Some economic sectors don’t reasonably rate the status they once did. Steel output is an excellent example that ought to be replaced by high-tech composites that are lighter and stronger than steel and its alloys. For example, from this 2020 listing of the top ten global carbon fiber manufacturers, we can see none are US corporations with three being German, and the remainder Japanese or Chinese; yet, carbon fiber and other composites are rapidly replacing steel and aluminum because they are more versatile, stronger, and lighter. Indeed, despite their rather poor reputation, petrochemical producers are becoming one of the top industries, something Russia with all its hydrocarbons is very keen to capitalize upon and thus further reduce its dependance on Western products and supply chains. A key point is most such industry relocated from the Outlaw US Empire when its feedstocks became too expensive during the 2000s.
There are further interesting idiosyncrasies within the Outlaw US Empire’s manufacturing sector regarding capacity and utilization to be explored. Somehow, the USA’s economic heartbeat continues but is faint and shallow. Given ongoing Neoliberalism, I don’t expect that to improve.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 18 2022 22:17 utc | 24

Or when did you hear them mention the
“not one inch eastward”?

Posted by: blueswede | Jan 18 2022 22:19 utc | 25

@ Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 18 2022 21:39 utc | 22
Thanks Tom. I also came across the supposedly “far left” Louis Proyect, and he seemed to be very much a pseudo-left shill for the establishment. Unfortunately there seems to be a decent living to be had in that particular niche.

Posted by: Julian | Jan 18 2022 22:21 utc | 26

@james, #18:
You may be right the chart lumped legal services into professional and business services. But these days, with tax filing services, accounting services, consulting services, advertising services, etc., etc., 12.8% would also seem too low.
Never mind though :-), like I quipped, figures don’t lie but liar figures. We have an economy here in the USA where real GDP is perhaps only 20% of the BIG numbers posted every year.
Your country, with natural resources as a main staple, does somewhat better.

Posted by: Oriental Voice | Jan 18 2022 22:24 utc | 27

Now if I was an AI based securities trader, I’d know exactly what I’d do: short or sell anything China. It seems written just for that.

Posted by: bobzibub | Jan 18 2022 23:04 utc | 28

An easier phase of growth involves moving underemployed villagers to industry and other higher added value jobs in cities. At some point, villagers are not underplayed anymore. The second growth component are raw materials, Chinese economy reached such size that further growth of demand leads to growth of prices of the imported materials and literally, to the import of inflation. It is not just China but the entire world experiences inflation that stems from raw materials, further growth requires restructuring the economy on national (in China) and global scale.
The parts of the restructuring that have to occur in the “collective West” seem to occur under the diktat of total idiots. The move away from fossil fuels is a good idea, IMHO. But this requires investment and choices, and the choices seem whimsical in various ways. Closing nuclear power stations that are already amortized seem an extreme folly: this source of energy offers very good net CO2 emission and cost, as almost all investments are done decades ago. And yet, it is being done in the name of “green romanticism” (thank you Friedrich von Schiller).

Posted by: Piotr Berman | Jan 18 2022 23:11 utc | 29

@ John Cleary (12) The US just appropriated $770 billion for the Defense Department budget, which does not include funding of the intelligence services and other elements of the national security state. Russia’s defense budget is between $60-65 billion per year. Which side do you think is getting more bang (literally) for the buck?

Posted by: Rob | Jan 18 2022 23:13 utc | 30

Tom Q Collins @ 22, Julian @ 26:
Louis Proyect has commented here at MoA and also infested Off-Guardian comments forums in past years. He certainly was a very unwelcome and sneering presence when he popped up (which thankfully wasn’t often).
Proyect died in August last year.

Posted by: Jen | Jan 18 2022 23:27 utc | 31

IMO, the main message b is trying to get across is the big mistake of basing any policy on lies or other forms of falsehood, which is the basic mantra driving Russia and its top two diplomats, Putin and Lavrov. In his newest essay, “How the EU found itself excluded from talks on deciding Europe’s future,” Glenn Diesen employs that very mantra by showing what occurs when reality finally surfaces:
“In advance of the talks last week, Washington rhetorically agreed that European security cannot be decided over the heads of the EU and Ukraine, before then simply going ahead with the bilateral US-Russia format. Simply put, Washington cannot do diplomacy with Eurocrats in the room.
The first reason is that the credibility of US security guarantees is juxtaposed with compromise. In 1962, President Kennedy and the Soviet Union reached an agreement to resolve the Cuban missile crisis, which stipulated that the US would remove its Jupiter missiles from Turkey in return for the Soviet Union removing its missiles from Cuba. Instead of celebrating the diplomatic efforts that prevented nuclear war, the US conditioned the agreement on it being kept a secret. Kennedy lied to the US public and its foreign allies. For two decades, the US public believed that the crisis had been solved by confronting Moscow in an uncompromising stance, which made the Soviets back down and grant victory to the US.
“Jack Matlock, the last US ambassador to the USSR, argues [As do many others. Link at original] that the US similarly rewrote history by claiming that the Cold War was ‘won’ by the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, when in reality it was negotiated to an end in 1989 through compromise. According to Matlock, the consequence of US mythmaking is a national narrative in which peace is achieved by staring down and defeating its adversaries, while compromise is denounced as ‘appeasement.’ Consequently, actual diplomacy and compromise must be done behind closed doors.” [My Emphasis]
Thus, we’re finally told why the Outlaw US Empire is against any form of public diplomacy–so it can lie about it all later.
This is such an excellent article I’m very tempted to copy/paste it all, but that will just prompt b to delete it all. Of the many broken agreements and promises mentioned so far, here is yet another that shows why Putin would be led to think of trying to establish a united Europe that included Russia:
“The EU and Russia reached the pivotal EU-Russia Common Spaces Agreement in 2005, which committed [Link at original] both sides to pursue integration efforts towards the common neighborhood ‘in a mutually beneficial manner, through close result-oriented EU-Russia collaboration and dialogue, thereby contributing effectively to creating a greater Europe without dividing lines‘….
“Consequently, a divided Europe is destined to become increasingly irrelevant. Attempting to move the dividing lines incrementally towards Russian borders is fueling mutual sanctions and military conflicts, which results in Western Europe becoming more reliant on the US. Without strategic autonomy, EU-Russian relations will be hostage to US-Russian relations, to the extent the West Europeans have little to contribute. During the Cold War, the continent was at least the center of attention and a key priority for the US, while in the present era, EU members are becoming ever-more dependent on the US, which in turn is forced to prioritize East Asia as the center of gravity.” [My Emphasis]
The lies and falsehoods have caused both the Outlaw US Empire and the EU to dig their own very deep holes from which the only way to extricate themselves is to finally acknowledge the Truth, apologize, swallow pride while ejecting any thoughts of being in a position of power, and pragmatically negotiate.
IMO, continuing to uphold the lies and falsehoods will eventually lead to war–and the same also applies to the cases of China and Taiwan, the Koreas, and Occupied Palestine. Unfortunately, IMO nobody in a position of power within the Outlaw US Empire or its vassals is aware of where the Truth lies, which makes the situation extremely dangerous with the Russians, Chinese, Koreans, and Palestinians and its allies all aware of the Truth and the many attempts to distort/destroy it.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 18 2022 23:34 utc | 32

says UK defense budget for 2021 was USD68 billion, so john is correct – UK and russia budget for this is very similar and less then 1/10th that of the usa’s… janes article here – UK Defence Budget: Still a balancing act

Posted by: james | Jan 18 2022 23:35 utc | 33

This is going a bit off-topic though the general theme is that slanted reporting among major news media outlets and organisations occurs because these organisations are unwilling to bite the hand that feeds them and instead fawn over it.
Here’s an interesting article on the Gates Foundation’s influence on major news media organisations:
Journalism’s Gates keepers

“… As philanthropists increasingly fill in the funding gaps at news organizations—a role that is almost certain to expand in the media downturn following the coronavirus pandemic—an underexamined worry is how this will affect the ways newsrooms report on their benefactors. Nowhere does this concern loom larger than with the Gates Foundation, a leading donor to newsrooms and a frequent subject of favorable news coverage.
[Article writer Tim Schwab] recently examined nearly twenty thousand charitable grants the Gates Foundation had made through the end of June and found more than $250 million going toward journalism. Recipients included news operations like the BBC, NBC, Al Jazeera, ProPublica, National Journal, The Guardian, Univision, Medium, the Financial Times, The Atlantic, the Texas Tribune, Gannett, Washington Monthly, Le Monde, and the Center for Investigative Reporting; charitable organizations affiliated with news outlets, like BBC Media Action and the New York Times’ Neediest Cases Fund; media companies such as Participant, whose documentary Waiting for “Superman” supports Gates’s agenda on charter schools; journalistic organizations such as the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, the National Press Foundation, and the International Center for Journalists; and a variety of other groups creating news content or working on journalism, such as the Leo Burnett Company, an ad agency that Gates commissioned to create a “news site” to promote the success of aid groups. In some cases, recipients say they distributed part of the funding as subgrants to other journalistic organizations—which makes it difficult to see the full picture of Gates’s funding into the fourth estate …”

No wonder people think of the odious Bill Gates as a demigod figure!

Posted by: Jen | Jan 18 2022 23:39 utc | 34

Posted by: Julian | Jan 18 2022 22:21 utc | 26
and
Posted by: Jen | Jan 18 2022 23:27 utc | 31
Julian, Jen: I was getting ready to reply to your post when I saw Jen’s. I was aware that Proyect was writing for a very small pet project called Washington Babylon (which I learned of from a MoA comment in the past) up until September or October of last year. I just checked there and there’s an article with a video interview up called “Louis Proyect’s Last Words” or something similar. Guess that’s in reference to his having passed.
Even when he was still around and especially for the last 10 years, I found him far more often in various comments sections (including here now that Jen refreshed my memory) than I found published works from him. I concluded that he had to have been on *somebody’s* payroll and that it must have been a State Department or CIA adjacent (or a hasbara outfit) because of the extremely low volume of actual work and his policing of comments at Salon and elsewhere.
He was definitely NOT “far left” by any stretch of the imagination if that entails being anti-war in some capacity. I don’t think he commented much on anything other than his hatred of Assad and love of Israel.

Posted by: Tom_Q_Collins | Jan 18 2022 23:39 utc | 35

re Louis Proyect @22 and @26
I also noticed that Louis Proyect was extremely anti Assad and surprisingly tolerant of American imperialism, all while posting as “The Unrepentant Marxist” on his eponymous blog. He was a frequent contributor to Counterpunch.
In case you were not aware, he passed away in August of 2021 at which point none other than Jeffrey St Clair wrote
“We lost another good friend today in Louis N. Proyect. … Lou had his passions, Syria, being one, which often put him on the wrong side of many doctrinaire anti-Imperialists.” (Emphasis is mine.)
which tells you a lot about the editorial slant at Counterpunch.

Posted by: spudski | Jan 18 2022 23:41 utc | 36

Apologies to Jen and Tom Q Collins – your posts that note Mr Proyect’s demise were not showing when I began composing my submission.

Posted by: spudski | Jan 18 2022 23:46 utc | 37

I think the headline inverts the chain of events. Slanted reporting comes after as a justification and cover for bad foreign policies.

Posted by: Figleaf23 | Jan 18 2022 23:49 utc | 38

“China’s economy is growing, but at what cost?”

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayast | Jan 18 2022 23:53 utc | 39

Louis Proyect was one of those “left wing” people like GorgeRise Mindbot who are the biggest supporters of imperialism. They’re always calling for war. Jeff Danziger (a Vietnam war veteran “peace” cartoonist) is at least as bad and maybe worse.

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayast | Jan 18 2022 23:56 utc | 40