Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 3, 2021
One Day – Three Biden Failures

The three issues below are unrelated to each other except that they convey the rapid failure of the Biden administration.

There were state governor elections in Virginia and New Jersey and they results do not look good for the Democrats:

Tuesday’s elections left the Democratic Party reeling after one Republican won the governor’s race in Virginia and another posed an unexpectedly strong challenge to New Jersey’s incumbent governor, with the race still too close to call.

A year after Mr. Biden won Virginia by 10 percentage points, former Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, failed in his quest to win back his old office, losing to the Republican candidate, Glenn Youngkin, in a contest that was closely watched for what it could signal about voters’ satisfaction or lack thereof with the incumbent president and his party. Mr. McAuliffe conceded to Mr. Youngkin on Wednesday morning.

Atrios explains best why the Dems are again losing:

[T]he story of every Dem election win is they promise lefty stuff, fail to deliver, then they lose subsequent elections and then tell themselves that doing all the lefty stuff they didn't do was the cause. They lose power, eventually go back to running on lefty stuff, win, and then again fail to deliver.

The failure to deliver is a indeed a constant. But there is a reason behind that. The U.S. election system is basically based on bribery and thus incapable to deliver the policies most people want.

The system has little to do with real democracy. It is a sham. People around the world know this. People in the U.S. know it too and want it changed:

In the Global Attitudes Survey this spring, Pew asked 18,850 adults in 17 advanced economies, including the United States, about their views of American society and politics. Countries surveyed included Britain, Canada, Australia, France, Germany and South Korea.

“Very few in any public surveyed think American democracy is a good example for other countries to follow,” Pew’s report said. …

Over the last days there has been a conference of the parties of the UN climate convention. U.S. President Biden had planned to 'lead' it.



bigger

Biden then insulted the Chinese President Xi Jingping for not coming to the conference:

Joe Biden launched a stinging attack on China on Tuesday for the failure of the country’s president, Xi Jinping, to show up to the Cop26 UN climate summit, and failing to show leadership on the climate crisis.

The US president said it was a “big mistake” that his Chinese counterpart had chosen not to attend the summit, where more than 120 world leaders have spent the last two days discussing ways to limit global temperature rises to 1.5C.

“We showed up,” Biden told a press conference, speaking before world leaders departed, to leave the floor to their ministers and officials for two weeks of tense negotiations.

“They didn’t show up … It is a gigantic issue and they just walked away,” he said, also criticising Russia and Vladimir Putin.

“How do you do that and claim to have any leadership mantle?”

Wearing his imaginary leadership mantle Biden then demanded to pump and burn more oil:

President Joe Biden kept up the pressure on OPEC+ to combat high oil prices, blaming it for inflationary pressure at home just two days before Saudi Arabia, Russia and the rest of the cartel meet to discuss oil policy.

“If you take a look at gas prices, and you take a look at oil prices, that is a consequence of, thus far, the refusal of Russia or the OPEC nations to pump more oil,” Biden told reporters at a news conference at the United Nations climate summit in Glasgow. “And we’ll see what happens on that score sooner than later.”

The pressure on OPEC+ is unusually strong. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken spoke with Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed, the foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates on Tuesday to press for increased production. Other oil-consuming nations are pushing hard as well, with Japan and India wanting more production as the energy crisis threatens to undermine the economic recovery in Europe and Asia.

To demand more oil pumping at a global climate summit is probably the most tone deaf 'leading' anyone could think of.

The Iranian Republican Guards Corp revealed a rather wild story today:

The US military confiscated the Iranian tanker loaded with crude oil in the Sea of Oman, which connects the Arabian Sea with the Strait of Hormuz, and intended to unload its shipment to another tanker and direct it to an unknown destination.

Reacting promptly, however, members of the IRGC’s Navy carried out a heliborne operation on the stolen ship’s deck, gained control of the vessel, and directed it back toward Iran’s territorial waters.

US forces then proceeded to chase the tanker using several helicopters and warships, but their attempt at taking over the vessel for a second time was thwarted again by Iranian naval forces.

The tanker is currently in Iranian territorial waters and under the protection of IRGC’s Navy.

There is video footage available which seems to confirm all but the first part of the story. It shows the IRGC landing on the tanker, U.S. war ships coming in and IRGC fastboats putting themselves between the tanker and two full fledged U.S. Navy destroyers. But how or why the U.S. was involved with the tanker in the first place is not clear to me.

The tanker is the Vietnamese flagged vessel SOTHYS. It may have been involved in smuggling oil from Iran when the IRGC intervened.

There has been so far no statement from the U.S. side on this. But whatever it had planned seems to have failed.

Comments

RE: Posted by b at 18:17 UTC | Comments (100)
“U.S. President Biden had planned to ‘lead’ it. “
“The government’s fossil-fuel-expanding trade intentions raise urgent questions about its hosting of COP26, writes Nafeez Ahmed.”
Among the reasons that the Presidents of China and Russia are not present.
Their abscence is interpreted by some that they are “nervous of criticism”.
From the 1970’s onwards Ecocide in the Soviet Union was/is an integral part of the continuing transcendence of “The Soviet Union” by the Russian Federation, including the increasing participation of those involved in this lateral process of transcendence, Mr. Ivanov and his associates being assigned prime focus in the matter from 2014 onwards, although the matter was assigned increasing significance/participation from the late 1970’s onwards in conjuction with efforts in relation to “nuclear winter” and other forms of “climate change” including the recent meeting :
https://tass.com/politics/1355261 refers;
The scope of Mr. Ivanov’s role and those of Mr. Ivanov’s associates being assigned/ designed to maximise options of sustainable/holistic lateral moderations/modulations, since it is unlikely that non-holistic linear “solutions/”magic bullets”” are sustainable options.
although some opponents chose to misrepresent Mr. Ivanov’s promotion as him being “sacked”.
The “United Nations” approach is in part an emulation of Mr. Brezhnev’s approach – when he wanted to do nothing he convened a meeting of The Council of Soviets.

Posted by: MagdaTam | Nov 5 2021 13:26 utc | 101

suzan @58: “Save a bee, plant a garden, fiddle a hornpipe jig, etc.; let those who throttle human development struggle to figure out how and where and why they went astray. If they “get it” then welcome them in with no aversion, no attachment. Life goes on.”
Agreed! And with the rest of your post as well!
You raise a very important point that the deep state/oligarchy is divided. This division shows that they are facing a crisis that they don’t really know how to fix. Or more accurately they are certain they know what to do but it isn’t working, so factions formed. Trump benefited from this in 2016, but it seems unlikely that the minority factions in the oligarchy really intended for him to win. It was more of a warning to the dominant faction. What is certain is that this division promises some more interesting chaos in the years to come.
Of course, your “life goes on” attitude (and that of millions of other normal people) drives the establishment nuts. They want you tuning in to what they have to say and hang on every one of their words. If just a few people don’t believe them they don’t care, but now at least a hundred million in the US alone don’t think they are worth paying attention to and that has the establishment losing sleep.

Posted by: William Gruff | Nov 5 2021 13:30 utc | 102

Rob | Nov 4 2021 20:33 utc | 98
I knew when I wrote that, I wasn’t really communicating effectively and I should have just held my tongue. I missed the mark.
SOME of the things you cite are indeed broadly supported across the US population. But that doesn’t seem to me to support the idea that the people, in general, broadly support “Progressive Policies”. That seems to me to conflate rather than effectively communicate what is happening.
So, I would say that SOME policies that serve best the population as a whole are rationally and broadly supported because they encourage the development of human potential to the greatest degree possible (Progressive??); but it is folly to lump them in with the things which many do not support at all while not attacking the underlying problems. And nobody is, across the board. And they won’t until there is total collapse and ensuing chaos (actually a creative evolutionary force).
Doesn’t really matter. Our government here is beyond the citizens’ ability to impact its course of action, no matter the ideology being pitched. Isn’t that the whole point? The political scene is theater.
Virginia may, to those who think “statistics” from past years tell the tale of today, look like it is just following a past pattern; but I would argue that today what is afoot is more deeply rooted and indicative of a major shift. There is a huge rejection amongst the general populace of what the supposedly “Progressive” Democrats are not just verbally offering (and failing to support – lying about) but attempting to force. THAT sticks in the craw across the spectrum, as it should.
Regardless of what McCauliffe “ran on”, he was generally IDENTIFIED by a more conservative populace as “Progressive”.
To any rational educated person Mandates from the Government (supported by McCauliffe) – regardless of what they are about, to be backed by the exercised monopoly of force held by that government against the citizens are anything BUT Progressive; yet it is largely those not labeled “Progressives” who oppose such abject govenmental abuse of power…
“Progressives” and their “policies” are identified, like it or not, with the Democrats’ hysteria over Donald Trump as a Russian asset (falsely); the absurd labeling of the 1/6 Capitol rally as being an armed “insurrection”; or the abusive political use of the (un)Justice Department and every other “intelligence” or enforcement agency of government; Or support for rampant censorship and the egregious misuse of the very idea of “mis-information” according to judgement of Plutocratic Oligarch “authorities”. Or the misuse of Government to overextend its authority way beyond anything it was actually empowered to do.
Corruption aided by pervasive lying and wholly made up stories (lies repeated aggressively ad infinitum) has become the norm for our government and broad acceptance of that the norm for our society. Some people are waking up and the very word “progressive” as applied to political policies has become a negative emotional trigger and absolute anthema for many.
Democrats fail; Republicans fail; The Government fails; The monetary system fails; the economic system fails; The educational system fails; The abusive for-profit-health-care-system fails; None of it is working for the citizens… Meanwhile, the money flows ever upward and the more it does, the more power is taken from the people, and the more enslaved we all become when we allow ourselves to be distracted with the “theater”.
I think, When it blows, it will be epic.
Perhaps we are actually saying the same thing…

Posted by: Doesitreallymatter | Nov 6 2021 22:56 utc | 103

@Doesitreallymatter (103) The policies are indeed progressive, but most people, including conservatives, think of them as common sense programs that would make their lives better. The word “progressive” has been tarred in much the same way that “liberal” was tarred in the 90s. Here is what Caitlin Johnstone said about the Democratic Party:
It’s hilarious that people still think the Democratic Party cares about winning elections. That’s not its job, children. That’s not why the Democratic Party exists. The Democratic Party exists to kill leftward progress in the world’s most powerful nation. That’s all it cares about doing.
The Democratic Party doesn’t care about winning elections. The Democratic Party doesn’t care about promoting popular policies. The Democratic Party doesn’t care about passing legislation.

Posted by: Rob | Nov 7 2021 17:47 utc | 104