|
The MoA Week In Review – OT 2021-084
Last week's posts at Moon of Alabama:
—- Other issues:
U.S. 'Democracy'
Wokewatch:
Climate:
JFK:
Use as open thread …
Very important article. Recommend the read even if it’s not very good for the simple fact most readers here are not well-versed into the subject:
Land of Capital: The history of the United States as the history of capitalism.
On a side note: Marx had already noticed during his lifetime that the USA was the first “pure capitalist” nation. The Bolsheviks (everybody, from Trotsky to Bukharin – there was no point of dissidence here) also already knew in the 1920s the USA was much more dynamic than the European imperialist powers and that it was only a matter of time before it supplanted them. The British Empire was the most immediate existential threat to the USSR in the 1920s, but they already knew a monumental clash against the USA would happen in the far future. This clash indeed happened, in the form of the Cold War.
The USA indeed is the capitalist version of the USSR. Capitalism always was synonymous with being American, but this historical role of the USA gained very curious contours after the October Revolution. As the USSR rose to global prominence, the anti-communist elements of the Russian Empire, Asia, Europe and (much later) Latin America flocked to the USA Mainland as the epic struggle between socialism and capitalism gained in scale and sophistication. As a result, the USA became an ideological cauldron where all variations of Liberalism (i.e. the ideology of capitalism) met, clashed and mixed. The USA gradually but inexorably became the HQ of the “Capitalist International”, the mirror image and polar opposite of the Soviet Union and, therefore, socialism.
This “melting pot” would later degenerate and collapse with the crisis of 2008, creating the Postmodern society, marked by extreme political polarization, that we know today. None of this would have happened without the Soviet Union, which put immense (and existential) pressure on the capitalist system, forced it to gain form and shape and thus become a viable target.
–//–
LDP beats the odds at Japan’s election: Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s conservative party retains majority with fewer losses than anticipated
Sure, sure, “the odds”. Democracy (i.e. liberal democracy) is that mysterious, divine and pure system that works in mysterious ways, after all, there’s absolutely no fraud, voter suppression, economic-catastrophist blackmail, virulent and aggressive propaganda and behind-the-scenes chicanery…
–//–
The weak emperor:
Over 70% of Americans Think US Going Wrong Way, More Than Half Disapprove of Biden, Poll Shows
By now, the American leftists must already be praying to their Christian God Biden is their Nerva, not their Maximinus Thrax, because there’s literally nothing left to hold into.
–//–
Turned out it’s as bad as we thought:
Russia explains why there is no more diplomacy with NATO
“Every time, they demanded to convene the council to discuss Ukraine. Their whole interest was whipping up propaganda and putting pressure on Russia,” Lavrov argued. “We rely on facts, and the facts are that NATO does not want any co-operation with us.”
–//–
European gas price rises on reports of flow reversal via key Russian pipeline from Germany to Poland
The price of natural gas in Europe jumped by 11% on Monday morning after reports of Russian supplies via the Yamal-Europe pipeline reversing course from Germany over the weekend.
The gas ended up in Poland, which often buys reverse gas supplies from Germany in order to avoid the appearance of buying gas directly from Russia.
Russia helps China overcome energy crisis by boosting electricity exports
Those ideological Europeans. They lose their minds but not their snobbishness.
The Asians do, the Europeans complain. Memorize this, because you’ll use it often for the remaining of this century.
–//–
Would Russia or China Help Us if We Were Invaded by Space Aliens? by Thomas L. Friedman, for the NYT
Some aliens descend to Earth after using a propulsion system that transcends our imagination and you think they’ll give themselves the inconvenience of studying – let alone respecting – human geopolitical boundaries?
–//–
I Just Turned 60, but I Still Feel 22 by Margaret Renkl, for the NYT
That’s called being born rich, Margaret.
Posted by: vk | Nov 1 2021 15:12 utc | 107
@99 C1ue:
You said:
My view is that we will not see major change until the economic and social repression is so severe that everyday people will revolt. And once a revolt occurs, no amount of calm, rational advice is going to matter.
No, it is not guaranteed that we will have a revolt..
But are they any [leaders like FDR, etc.] today of that stature [that can guide a society thru tuff times]? I can’t say I see any evidence of it, whatsoever.
Tom replies:
I agree that top-down change is highly unlikely, and when it happens, it’ll be at least as bad as it is now. So take “top-down” off the table, I say.
Now to bottom-up. Top-down has closed off nearly all bottom-up political change avenues, and will continue to do so, since it’s in their interest to perpetuate things as-is for them; for them, it’s all good except for the lower-level unhappiness, and that’s what repression tools (aplenty) are for, and that’s why they exist.
So what’s the move for the left-outs?
Most left-outs don’t have any moves. The _reason_ they’re left-out is because they’re not competent, or because they’re not aware of their alternatives. Ever it thus, this time’s not different.
There is a cohort – well-distributed, and certainly not coherent – of people that are competent, aware, and motivated to change their particular situation. There is, as yet, nobody holding a gun to anyone’s head _making_ them do stupid stuff that’s against their own interests.
Now, you and I, and others have been circling around this question of “what’s a better system”. You said “waste of time to ask the Q because the system ain’t gonna change”. Roger that.
What can change, tho, is the “system” at the micro-level. The household, the place where a person still has plenty of “agency”. So, when you say stuff like “small-scale production is a non-starter, can’t be efficient, therefore won’t and shouldn’t happen”….I commend you to re-think that posture.
There are plenty of reasons to expect the efficiency of “small” to change relative to “big”. Agency is at “small”, tools are accumulating @ “small” level that enable “small” to find, occupy, and defend market niches.
Much, much more to be said here, and no doubt, at first blush, you’ll call BS. Before you do, give this a think:
a. Labor is being factored out of production equation at warp-speed. Where’s labor’s role in future?
b. Meeting HH needs via HH production is moving into focus, and into realm of possible, also very fast. You’ll disagree here, likely, but let’s you and I and other-interested conduct the debate. My guess is that some perspectives – including my own – are going to change some.
Posted by: Tom Pfotzer | Nov 1 2021 15:13 utc | 109
|