|
The MoA Week In Review – OT 2021-080
Last week's posts at Moon of Alabama:
— Other issues:
Covid-19:
Boeing 737:
The Foreign Office hasn't changed at all …
Syria:
Use as open thread …
Thanks everyone for your input about Zhao Wei!
My point is not whether or not she’s a bad person or not (obviously she seems to have done some unethical stuff in her business dealings) or whether she has developed a cult or not (well she’s my favorite Chinese actress, that’s how first discovered she had disappeared from the Chinese internet when I searched for her, plus she’s probably the most successful and popular star in China).
Really it’s not about her, it’s about the Chinese people’s right to know. Fine if she goes to jail for shady dealings or even blacklisted and forbidden to appear in further movies if the authorites determine that she’s a “bad influence”. How would you feel if you wake up one day and find out that you can’t find any movies by, say Harrison Ford or Brad Pitt, as if they never acted, because they’re accused of insider trading? Probably not so good I expect.
I’m very sympathetic to the Chinese govt’s uphill struggle against the global narrative war waged by the Western govts and media, but adopting the “cancel culture” at a govt level doesn’t seem to me the way to proceed.
As for dissent, it was not about Zhao Wei, but more about allowing dissenting opinions on the net. Wasting time playing whack-a-mole with “forbidden” topics is a losing game that makes people feel patronized and alienated and weakens the argument of the authorities (Beaumarchais cames to mind, who wrote: ‘Sans la liberté de blâmer, il n’est point d’éloge flatteur’, Without the freedom to blame, there are no worthy praise)
The West is much more successful at shaping narratives. Instead of using Orwellian tactics like China which, to be honest, are a bit primitive in the age of internet, they used Huxleyan tactics, where they use persuasion techniques to sell their narratives to the public while allowing nominal freedom of expression. Allowing dissent (like what we can read regularly on this forum) but marginalizing it is effective in reiforcing the main narrative and give it extra strength (“look! some people don’t agree with the MSM but nobody listens to them’)
Posted by: psychohistorian | Oct 17 2021 15:35 utc | 5
re: Jack Ma, it’s similar indeed, with the addition of having her works removed from the net (thankfully you can still find some on youtube)
Posted by: Krungle | Oct 17 2021 16:11 utc | 7
Would you trust your own govt to decide what is “legitimate” dissent? I don’t think so, right? I’m sure you want to decide by yourself. So why patronize the Chinese people by thinking they must blindly trust their govt? The current Chinese govt is pretty good and probably one of the best in the past few century, but that doesn’t mean it is to be followed blindly.
Posted by: vk | Oct 17 2021 16:54 utc | 10
You’re right, she was not scrubbed from the internet, just her works. Still, the only official explanation is that that was done to comply with unspecified regulations. Isn’t that scary that things happen because of laws that are not spelled out?
And yes, that’s similar to cancel culture in the West. Is that a good thing?
Posted by: Gulag | Oct 17 2021 21:21 utc | 36
I have no beef with the crackdown. What worries me is the dumbing-down of the public. Can’t see how her business dealings have to do with her work as an artist.
Posted by: Oriental Voice | Oct 17 2021 21:33 utc | 37
As I stated, it’s not about her, it’s about the public. Shouldn’t it be informed about what is it that led to her removal, instead of unspecified directives from the govt? And if she’s been so bad for so long, why hasn’t she been condemned and sent to jail or worse?
One thing I like in the Western system, and I think everybody like, whether in the West or in the East, is due process. And saying some people don’t deserve that, or that the “people” have decided (on the internet), it’s not just wrong, it’s corrosive at a state level.
Sorry to hear you’ve been offended, but yes, erasing people because the authorities don’t like them *is* Stalinist, and whether the Western woke culture does it or not doesn’t change that.
Listen, the Chinese govt is still, as Deng said, “crossing the river by feeling the stones”, they tweak things as they go, and that’s admirable enough. There’s no need to blindly believe that everything they do is perfect and above criticism.
Posted by: Chunglak | Oct 18 2021 0:04 utc | 50
|