Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 25, 2021
Iran Election Preview

The Guardian Council of Iran, which preselects candidates for the presidential election, has today announced the names of those who have passed its tests:

The list of seven presidential hopefuls was unveiled by Iranian state media on Tuesday. The candidates have been picked from nearly 600 people who submitted their bids for approval. The list is dominated by political hardliners, including judiciary chief Ebrahim Raisi, believed to be a very close figure to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and a favorite in the upcoming polls.

Raisi ran for president before, losing to the incumbent president, Hassan Rouhani, back in 2017 by a wide margin of nearly 20% of the votes. Rouhani is barred from running for office again due to legal limitations, as he has already served the maximum allowed two consecutive four-year terms.

Two candidates who I would have liked to see running were disqualified.

One was former parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani on the reformist side who had supported the current President Rouhani in the Majles (parliament). The reformists, who had banked on the nuclear deal, lost support when Trump shunned it and sanctions brought the economy down. The Majles now has a conservative majority and the upcoming presidential elections will likely also trend towards a conservative candidate.

But if Larijani had been allowed to run the election would also have been a real contest between the conservative and reformist side. Without such a contest the voter participation in the election will be on the lower side. That might damage the system's legitimacy.

Golnar Motevalli @golnarM – 11:19 utc · May 25, 2021

Fars news says the latest poll indicates participation in Iran's presidential election will be 53%.
Of those who said they will definitely turn up and vote, 72.5% said they'll pick Raisi.

On the conservative side I would have liked to see the former president (2005-2013) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad being allowed to run. While the establishment – in Iran and in the 'west' – despised his style, working class people in Iran tend to like him. A February poll by the University of Maryland asked "who would you want to be Iran’s next president". 28.2% named Raisi while 15.1% named Ahmadinejad. All other candidates had much lower values.

A confusing aspect of Iranian politics is that the socially conservatives, which the west unfairly calls 'hardliners', are on the social-democratic left on economic issues while the socially liberal reformers tend to favor the bazaari and capitalists. Still, it is not yet clear to me what Raisi's economic preferences and policies are.

The election will be held on June 18. Meanwhile the U.S. and Iran are still negotiating about the U.S. return to the nuclear deal. The Biden administration has been very slow to work on the issue and thereby destroyed all election hopes for the reformists in Iran. It also made it more likely that the attempt to return to the deal will fail as the soon ruling conservatives in Iran will likely oppose any condition the U.S. is trying to attach to it.

Comments

@100 & 98 Arch Bungle
Some very powerful observations here. I agree with all the directions of the various falls, without knowing enough to comment on the details. But yes, the US would attempt to preserve Israel through some kind of capitulation, or else to abandon it completely.
And that idea of a glass parking lot is of the most simplistic jingoism, as we all here know, a neocon wet dream as described. It accords with mainstream movie-going America, which typically reveals ignorance of Iranian topography and territorial size, and just how much ruin there is in a nation. There would be so much left after the first flight of nukes, so much to fight back with, so much to destroy the attackers with, in plans long established. And the US would have finished itself. To say nothing of Israel.
But as you say, adults still control those US buttons, and perhaps the Israeli ones as well. And it now becomes clear that we live in a time when Israel could become dispensable.

Posted by: Grieved | May 29 2021 2:33 utc | 101

Taxi’s latest piece over at Unz says that the unity of Palestine was, for the Resistance, the missing piece, and the long awaited piece. And now it’s here. One thing that occurred to me, pondering the historic Palestinian victory, is that of all scenarios for the end of Israel, there is no voice like that of Palestine to call for its dissolution and departure.
Iran is focused on removing the US soldiers from the Middle East, and in this she will succeed, I have no doubt.
But no force matches the moral authority of Palestine to demand the ending of the Israeli occupation – and now to act to enforce that ending.
Even Nasrallah is still aglow with the light that blazes from what Palestine has just achieved. A huge and final piece of the puzzle has just fallen into place. Now everything is perfectly aligned.
And this is wholly to the credit of the Palestinians, and also was partly from the long years of work of Soleimani.
Behind all the fighting, Iran sits well, quietly, in the background of Southwest Asia. I like this quiet force, pouring strength into all the allies, and she herself doing little that is visible – although with no hesitation in the showdowns she is compelled to undertake directly against the imperialists.
Palestine, one trusts, will now advance the cause against the occupiers, with the allies ready and hungering to join the fight. And the less we see that Iran does, the more we know that she is everywhere in the struggle. Appearances will not matter. Irresistibly the struggle will be won.

Posted by: Grieved | May 29 2021 2:56 utc | 102

Posted by: Fyi | May 28 2021 4:01 utc | 97
Mr. Fyi, Yes, I guess you didn’t understand that I was making a comparison that the leaders of Iran are NOT like the messianic cult that wants nothing but rapture.
They have wisely voted against nukes with their fatwa.
Now, we both have stated our positions. Barflies can decide for themselves, and history will be the witness, and the judge.
As for whether I am Iranian enough for you, you need to apologize, and I just have this to say: You can take an Iranian out of Iran, but you can’t take Iran out of an Iranian.
Ya Ali, Ya Hossein, Ya Hassan, Ya Abolfazl

Posted by: Sakineh Bagoom | May 29 2021 3:21 utc | 103

Ms. Sakineh Bagoom | May 29 2021 3:21 utc | 103
I decline, respectfully, to apologize for stating that you were neither Shia nor Iraian, as you claim.
It was not not an insult to proffer a guess as to someone’s religion or nationality.
I disagree with the religious opinion of Mr. Khamenei, Iran should have exited NPT in 1998 a d built nuclear weapons.
She would not have endured all that has passed since then.
Pakistan, the creator of Taliban, the refuge of Osaman Bin Ladin, the murderer of Shia is treated with respect by US.
Iran is treated with Maximum Pressure, aimed at her destruction, and disrespect.
But, then, again, Judeo-Christians have left America breft of honor for their religious beliefs, they did not a damn thing in case of USS Liberty, in case of the late Rachel Corey, and in case of Pakistan
You see, Pakistan is not the enemy of Israel and that was enough to wash the blood of 3300 people off Pakistan.

Posted by: Fyi | May 29 2021 3:44 utc | 104

I decline, respectfully, to apologize for stating that you were neither Shia nor Iraian, as you claim.
Posted by: Fyi | May 29 2021 3:44 utc | 104
No, Mr. Fyi, I don’t claim.
Here is your quote: “I gather that you are neither Iranian nor a Shia Muslim”

Posted by: Sakineh Bagoom | May 29 2021 3:59 utc | 105

Ms. Sakineh Bagoom | May 29 2021 3:59 utc | 105
I stand by what I wrote earlier.
I further gather that you are an Israeli.

Posted by: Fyi | May 29 2021 4:25 utc | 106