|
Taking A Few Days Off
Your host feels somewhat drained. Several posts I started to write over the last few days turned out to be rubbish and got trashed.
That is sure sign that I need a few days off. I'll leave an open thread on top and will check in once a day to release blocked comments. Aside from that I will be mostly offline.
See y all next week.
b.
—- Use as open thread …
Hemiola @ 15 Does anyone else here have ideas?”
The Virus and the Parasite <= about GIGs, PLCs and GIMPs => a proper scientific community <=one not constrained by government issued grants [GIGs] of monopoly powers designed to make wealthy one at the expense of all others; <=grants that make it against the law either to outproduce the products made by the existing private party that owns the GIMP or by incremental improvement of technology implicit in the government issued monopoly power [GIMP]. (Monopoly power (patent, license or copyrights (PLCs), transfer public resources and public access to knowledge from public to private hands. These transfers occur by GIGs.
GIGs make it illegal for a competitor either to produce more efficient products because GIMP belongs to a single owner, or to engage in improving the technology implicit in the privately owned GIMP. The GIMP denies competition. Neither better or more efficient product can be competitively produced nor can the existing technology be improved because it is illegal to compete with the GIMP. Monopoly protection in private hands defeats the essence of competitive capitalism and when it occurs, it is a blatant example of Oligarch abuse of a government to extort or extract the resources of the governed into private oligarch hands.
Not only must a would be competitor[WBC], if any, be forced to avoid developing a product that resembles the govt protected patented, licensed or copyrighted (PLC) product but also the would-be-competitor (WBC) must avoid using any of the component knowledge in the GIMP. When public government issues a monopoly power to a private or Non governmental organization, the government is using the power granted to it by the constitution, to convert public property into private single person owned property. In other words PTB are chopping up the government and giving the pieces to themselves. Public resources are being converted to privately owned property( GIMP, GIG, and PLCs).
the process by which a corona virus infects a human is well known. The health of no one <=would be challenged by a corona virus infection, if there were a way to block the infection. Infection prevent is a far better alternative than to bio engineer a post infection human response to the infection. Preventive measures (like wearing effective masks, social distancing and using technology capable to warn viral threats exist in this place<=causes an alarm to go off <=avoid contact with the virus. Enter the room with a virus particle or socially interact with an infected person present only with adequate protection. The alarm sounds and the target victim of the virus is warned.
We cannot cure the disease malaria but we can eradicate the vector [carrier] that infects victims with the pathogen that causes the disease. <=Mosquitoes.
What is needed is to prevent the infection from happening. Infect the virus before it can infect mankind.
here is some other ideas
There would be no big pharma if there were no GIGs and PLC laws.
Congress protects GIMP by use of force and rule of law. These laws eliminate competition. If patent, license and copyright (PLC) laws were repealed the big guys will fall and smart little guys will rise.
Old hippie @ `18 says The narrative is more powerful than a billion examples.<== Remember guys, the
powers pushing monopoly ownership of the world is not the government, (government is just the enforcement arm which guarantees what the private oligarch demand ) The pushing behind the scene power is to be found in the private corporate ivory towers and in the home offices of their Oligarch private owners.
Want to fix things,look not to the government but to the privately owned corporations and their oligarch owners.
To be a crime a government must <=by law=> outlaw a human behavior(behaviors which transgress the outlawed behavior). To be an infringement on human rights, a government must invade by its acts the space reserved to human rights.
In the case of the Constitution of the United States. the Bill or Rights promises that the government it authorizes will always allow those it governs to “keep and bear arms” and that it specifically denies the government the constitution creates, to infringe on that promise the right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” But requiring permits, limiting the kinds of guns, and selecting who can and who cannot own guns are themselves serious infringements; which violate the promises, warranties and guarantees the founders placed in the constitution; among those promises was that “the right to keep and to bear arms shall not be infringed”.
Ratification of the Oligarch invented constitution would never have happened if the founders who wrote and promoted the constitution had not promised everyone the constitution government will not infringe the bill of rights. .. if the bill of rights had not been added to the Constitution, there would not have been a constitution because the people to be governed would not stand for it.. The bill of rights restrains the acts of those who are to be the governors. The constitution promises that those who govern will not infringe the right to free speech, the right to keep and bear arms, but both promises have been broken by the laws the governors have written. No one seems to have done anything about it?
What should the governed do, when the government infringes on and violates a human right or ignores one or more of the conditions that allowed the constitution [<=from which all power to govern arises] to be ratified?
Infringements are not criminal acts. To be criminal requires that some law exist, which has been be violated. . Broken Constitutional promises are not crimes; they are infringements into space the constitution specifically prohibited the constitutionally authorized government to invade.
Infringements and invasion into constitutionally prohibited territory by government or by those who serve it have become common. How long must they be allowed? Infringement is an act which is a lot worse than the crime of say murder, IMO; infringement violates the space that protects human rights from those who have the power to govern. Has anyone seen an infringer arrested, charged with a crime, or punished for the infringement?
But the officers of the government and their privately owned support team ( the MSM) are working diligently to take most guns away from most of the governed people. This effort, and all that is accomplished by it, is an infringement on the promise made in the 2nd amendment (Bill of Right #2)? I think whether or not the people are going to let the government infringe on the right of humanity to keep and bear arms is going to come to a head soon.
The 2nd amendment (Bill of Rights #2) says "..The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. .."When laws or presidential orders quash a promise made to the people in the constitution, the law or order infringes both the human right protected space and the space protected to human rights by the constitution. Hence as long as there is a constitution every governed person will have the right to keep and bear arms. If a government infringes on that right, it has dissolved the constitution IMO.
That right to keep and bear arms will always exist as long as the constitution remains ratified. There would not have been a constitution without the bill of rights (BoRs). The BoRs were conditions required of the founders by those who were to ratify the Constitution. That which is government is legal, that which is constitutional demarks and defines the interface between the rights of all men <=who are to be the governed, and the rights of a few men who are to be the governors. The constitution when ratified, is an expression of agreement confirming the rights of two classes of people: those who are to be the governed, and those who are to be the governors.
IANAL.
Posted by: snake | Mar 27 2021 9:28 utc | 71
|