|
The MoA Week In Review – OT 2021-017
Last week's posts at Moon of Alabama:
1TVNewsAF @1TVNewsAF – 6:32 UTC · Feb 28, 2021
Sirajuddin Haqqani warns of never-seen-before fight if foreign troops don't exit Afghanistan by May.
"Today…we have the technology to use drones, we have our own missiles. This time if the Mujahideen resume fighting the enemies, it would be something they have never seen before."
Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald – 15:03 UTC · Feb 24, 2021
It took only two years to go from disappearing Milo and Alex Jones to banning content said to "amplify narratives that undermine faith in NATO."
Imagine where the line will be two years from now.
Censorship is an intoxicating power that endlessly expands until it's smashed.
—
Other issues:
Use as open thread …
“Internet wars: U.S. plans to overthrow the Cuban Revolution with new technologies
Cuba is committed to the safe, democratic, and responsible use of the internet, while the government, and in particular Fidel, have continued to promote the development of new technologies and full access to the internet for all citizens
Author: Iramsy Peraza Forte | informacion@granma.cu
Author: Sergio Alejandro Gómez | informacion@granma.cu
february 8, 2018 20:02:47
Photo: Radio Granma
In this modern era of cell phones, the internet, and social networks, it is easy to forget that the U.S. has been using communications technologies to attack Cuba ever since the age of shortwave radios and the emergence of television.
The U.S. State Department’s announcement this past January, of the creation of a Cuba Internet Task Force is, therefore, just another scheme in a long saga of Washington’s subversive plans to overthrow the Cuban Revolution.
From psychological warfare propagated by the mass media to unconventional warfare, which has been adapted to the internet age, Cuba has been a test site for U.S. schemes designed to overthrow governments which do not respond to its interests.
However, the competence of Cuban authorities and support of the entire population for the Revolution has meant that these plans were doomed to failure.
– March 17, 1960:
Then U.S. President, Dwigth D. Eisenhower, approved the so-called Program of Covert Action, designed to destroy the Cuban Revolution. Among other aspects, the CIA was tasked with setting up a radio station broadcasting political propaganda. On May 17, 1960, 1160 khz frequency Radio Cuba Libre (Radio Swan) was picked up for the first time on the island.
– September 22, 1981:
President Ronald Reagan singed executive order 12323, establishing the “Presidential Commission on Broadcasting to Cuba,” tasked with developing a recommended plan for radio broadcasting intended for transmission to Cuba, such as Radio Martí.
– May 20, 1985:
Radio Martí hits the airwaves for the first time, as part of a plan by the staunchly anti-Cuban Ronald Reagan administration, to launch an illegal radio station able to reach the island and incite a popular uprising against the Revolution.
– March 27, 1990:
Following the failure of subversive radio schemes, TV Martí was launched, costing the U.S. taxpayer millions of dollars and violating international norms. Dubbed “the TV no one watches,” the signal was effectively blocked by Cuban authorities across the entire island.
– 2004:
The Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba or Plan Bush is created by the George W. Bush administration to identify additional ways to hasten an overthrow of the “Cuban regime.”
Regarding technology, the plan proposes, among other things to “Encourage willing third-country governments to create public access Internet facilities in their missions in Cuba.”
Other initiatives included expanding “the distribution of information and facilitate pro-democracy activities,” and “Greater access to these types of equipment” in order to do so.
– 2006:
The Cuba Fund for a Democratic Future was created, providing 24 million USD worth of funding for anti-Cuban propaganda, including online initiatives.
– February 2006:
The U.S. Department of State, headed by Condolezza Rice, creates the Global Internet Freedom Task Force, specifically aimed at “maximizing freedom of expression and free flow of information and ideas” in China, Iran and Cuba.
– July 2007:
President Bush announces the creation of a fourth ‘cyberspace’ army at the Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, designed to maintain the U.S. military’s competitive advantage in this new theater of operations.
– December 2009:
U.S. citizen Alan Phillip Gross arrested for bringing illegal communication devices into Cuba as part of a USAID program. In March 2011 Gross was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment for “Acts Against the Independence or the Territorial Integrity of the State,” in the Courtroom for Crimes Against State Security of the People’s Provincial Court of Havana. Gross returned to the United States following the announcement of a process of rapprochement between the two countries on December 17, 2014.
– March 2011:
Operation Surf, unmasked by State Security agent Raúl – Dalexi González Madruga – consisted of smuggling equipment and software into the country to install illegal antennas to access the internet.
– 2011:
At the request of Senator Richard Lugar, the most prominent Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Carl Meacham, director of Latin America on the Senator’s political team, met with staff from the State Department, senior foreign diplomats and industry representatives over several months to investigate how social medial and technologies could be used to promote and strengthen what they consider to be democracy in Latin America. In his report Meacham shamelessly praises subversive actions and plan by the U.S. government against Cuba.
– March 21, 2012:
The ultra conservative Heritage Foundation attended an event sponsored by Google Ideas, and entitled “How the internet can unfreeze an island frozen in time.”
– April 2014:
The ZunZuneo initiative, financed by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is launched. The platform was designed as a messaging network similar to Twitter through which thousands of Cubans would receive “non-controversial content” like news messages on soccer, music, weather reports and announcements. However, later subscribers would begin to receive political content aimed at inspiring Cubans to organize mass demonstrations akin to “smart mobs” to destabilize the country.
The Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) which oversees Radio and TV Martí, launched a service similar to ZunZuneo called Piramideo, an SMS-based social network that would offer the possibility of sending a massive message to members of a “pyramid” at the cost of a single SMS. The objective was to prepare a platform for subversion.
Commotion: A tool developed by the Washington-based New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute (OTI), which was originally intended for military use, to create independent wireless networks. Although there is little to no information on its functioning in Cuba, U.S. government sources speaking to the New York Times noted that millions of dollars had been dedicated to the project.
– September 12-13, 2016:
The U.S. government organized the “First Cuba Internet Freedom Conference” headed by the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) which oversees illegal anti-Cuban radio and television broadcasts. The event brought together “independent” journalists from the island and digital innovators and activists who support the use of new technologies to bring about a regime change in Cuba.
– January 2018:
The Trump administration announces the creation of a new Internet Task Force designed to subvert Cuba’s internal order. Composed of government and independent officials tasked with promoting the free flow in information on the island, the initiative is Washington’s most recent attempt to disguise its plans to destabilize Cuba through the use of new technologies.”
Posted by: arby | Feb 28 2021 20:01 utc | 24
Breaking: Syrian air defenses (S-300?) were activated in the capital Damascus and its southern suburbs to repel an Israeli missile attack, state media reported. Most of the Israeli missiles were shot down.
Buckle up, kids because here we go. Bibi must have talked to Creepy Uncle Joe and gotten the green light to really up the ante. Didn’t take long, but what about the stimmy checks?
RE: The City Journal piece on post-journalism at the NYT, a couple of things.
1) City Journal is a right-wing publication of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, itself an arch-conservative think tank. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Manhattan_Institute_for_Policy_Research
2) The article starts off well enough with some compelling analysis on the new business model of papers like the NYT (but actually nothing new, more on that later), but descends into typical American rightwing tropes and unbacked assertions. Here are a couple of the first that jumped out at me:
The 1619 Project has come under fire for its extreme statements and many historical inaccuracies.
If so, then why is this entire paragraph un-footnoted and devoid of embedded hyperlinks? Many historical inaccuracies? I’ve been following that controversial story since the beginning and I can think of maybe two would-be inaccuracies that were addressed by the authors, and very publicly I should say. Also “has come under fire”? From whom, exactly? Historians? Who knows, because City Journal isn’t saying.
Here’s another:
According to one poll, a majority of Americans shared the opinion that Cotton expressed in his op-ed.
But you can’t tell us which poll or provide a link? I mean, seriously – LOL. That they are afraid to name the poll tells me it’s probably for a good reason.
The piece carefully tiptoes around potentially false statements and dubious claims as soon as the topic of the 1619 Project is broached.
But back to the analysis of the NYT’s new profit model – the same model that rightwing American news outlets have been using since the 1990s – that of division and angry readers. The following label could easily have been slapped on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News, among many others, as far back as the mid-90s:
The old media had needed happy customers. The goal of post-journalism, according to Mir, is to “produce angry citizens.”
And the City Journal piece breaks no new ground compared against the recent writings of Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi.
Indeed, distraction and division IS the American media’s business model and has been for some time in many places. That the NYT (and MSM corporate networks) took longer to catch on and dive in full bore doesn’t excuse the right wing media’s role in creating the “us vs. them” and “you should be angry!” approach to capturing and keeping viewership/readers and underlying theme of division that long predates the recent “woke” and “cancel culture” mobs. It was right wing media’s *job* to keep Americans angry at each other and fearful of “the other” lest the working class and poor wake up to the graft, corruption and theft of political power in Washington D.C. by large corporations and oligarchs including those who owned media enterprises. But now that the (fake, woke) corporatized “left” have started doing the same, we’re suddenly up against an existential crisis? LOL it sure is funny how short the collective American memory is.
Posted by: _K_C_ | Feb 28 2021 23:29 utc | 47
|
