Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 22, 2021

On Day 1 Joe Biden Destroyed Women's Sports

On his first day in office President Joe Biden destroyed women's sports.

As one of several executive orders Biden issued the

Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation.

It sets out a new policy:

Every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no matter who they are or whom they love. Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports. Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted, or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based stereotypes. People should be able to access healthcare and secure a roof over their heads without being subjected to sex discrimination. All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation.

This is librulism gone crazy.

The legal core of the executive order says:

In Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), the Supreme Court held that Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of . . . sex” covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. Under Bostock‘s reasoning, laws that prohibit sex discrimination — including Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), the Fair Housing Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), and section 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1522), along with their respective implementing regulations — prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, so long as the laws do not contain sufficient indications to the contrary.

Yes, this requires a bit of explaining.

Title VII is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 prohibits sex discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. BUT title IX also sets out exceptions for a number of specific educational activities including sports.

In the U.S. girl's and women's sport in schools and colleges only took off after Title IX was enacted.

Discriminations based on biological sex are not only allowed but seen as positive in sports. Women have their own leagues and their own competitions because it is a simple scientific fact of life that persons who are born with a Y chromosome, i.e. males, develop stronger bodies than persons born with an X chromosome. If there were no gender discrimination in sports no person born as woman would ever have a chance to win an open competition. There would always be stronger men who would win.

In the Rio 2016 Olympics the 100 meter final for men was won by Usain Bolt in 9.81 seconds. The last men in the finals, Trayvon Bromell, needed 10.06 seconds. The 100 meter final for women was won by Elaine Thompson in 10.71 seconds. She would have had no chance to even reach the men's semi finals.

The case the Supreme Court ruled on in Bostock v. Clayton County was based on a job discrimination against a gay man:

On June 15, 2020, the Court ruled in a 6–3 decision covering all three cases that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is necessarily also discrimination "because of sex" as prohibited by Title VII. According to Justice Neil Gorsuch's majority opinion, that is so because employers discriminating against gay or transgender employees accept a certain conduct (e.g., attraction to women) in employees of one sex but not in employees of the other sex.

The ruling by the court is controversial. What was the meaning of 'sex' in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it was enacted? Was it meant to cover how people 'identify' or did it only apply to the biological meaning of the word?

The problem with the Supreme Court ruling and Biden's executive order is that they extend the meaning of biological sex to 'gender identity'. This undermines the exception set out for sports under Title IX. Under Biden's interpretation any male can declare "I currently identify as woman" and run in the a women school or college competition. Under Biden's EO any school which rejects such nonsense will lose all federal support.

Abigail Shrier @AbigailShrier - 5:11 UTC · Jan 21, 2021

On day 1, Biden unilaterally eviscerates women's sports. Any educational institution that receives federal funding must admit biologically-male athletes to women's teams, women's scholarships, etc.

A new glass ceiling was just placed over girls.

Former U.S. Representative Tulsi Gabbard had seen that problem coming:

Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 @TulsiGabbard - 20:58 UTC · Dec 11, 2020

My 'Protect Women’s Sports Act' simply protects the rights & interests of girls & women who participate in sports so they can compete on a level playing field. Denying biological differences between men & women undermines the reason why Title IX was created in the first place.

H.R. 5603, the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2020 simply states:

For purposes of determining compliance with title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681–1688) in athletics, sex shall be determined on the basis of sex assigned at birth by a physician.

Gabbard detailed the problem and her position in a video:

Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 @TulsiGabbard - 19:34 UTC · Dec 13, 2020

Title IX is a historic law that positively changed everything for women & girls. This video explains how, and why I introduced the Protect Women’s Sports Act - to clarify, uphold & strengthen the original intent of Title IX, ensuring a level playing field for girls & women.

With her being no longer in the House there is little chance that the law will pass anytime soon.

Biden's executive order is one of many reasons why the Democrats will lose the next election. All over the U.S. high school boys who are too lame to become a member of a school's male team or to win in a male competitions will 'identify' as girls and demand to be allowed to join the female team or to take part in the female competition. It already happens but the number of such cases will now explode.

It is clear what will follow from that. Girls will stop to take part in competitive sports. They do not want to share a locker room with boys who, maybe only for a day, 'identify' as girls. They will also no longer have a chance to win anything.

It is not pure idioticy that Biden pushes out such nonsense. From the view point of the ruling class it makes sense to split the plebs along cultural ideological lines. As long as they fight each other about access to bathrooms based on 'identity' they will be distracted from recognizing that class discrimination and economic imbalances are the real problems they should care to change.

Issues like the above, which is plainly unreasonable for anyone not drunk on 'librul' LGBTQWERTY cool aid, are a major reason why the U.S. is losing international respect. It no longer cares about science or reason. It does not stick to legal commitments, treaties and international law. It has stopped to make any sense.

Posted by b on January 22, 2021 at 17:11 UTC | Permalink

Comments
« previous page

It is amazing how the defenders of “identitarian sports” refuse to acknowledge the issue b rightly calls out.
This isn’t theoretical. There are already multiple men competing against women in pro sports; this executive order is now going to proliferate the number.
The existing ones at least had the decency (for the most part) to actually go through sexual reassignment surgery - the executive order means even this isn’t necessary.
Sorry, but you people are simply ignoring biological reality as well as actual behavior already on the ground.

Posted by: c1ue | Jan 23 2021 2:09 utc | 101

Not sure it’s just to split the plebs, a lot of big donors want these things and are quite invested in it. Would explain why conservatives on Supreme Court seem to be on board with it. https://national-justice.com/american-oligarchs-i-pritzkers?fbclid=IwAR2EFOtG9ceveEHwukhIWdqW2vbiFe-At4PzczPmXOzc15vQdHYvSBafhPo

https://national-justice.com/conservative-supreme-court-refuses-rule-transgender-bathroom-case?fbclid=IwAR3nu4FOlSLymZ8hdbqWbUtVxPE-jUUHLXsRt_fvb11PyVpuL76rFPlt3Sg

Posted by: SteveZ | Jan 23 2021 2:18 utc | 102

Mon. Laguerre

http://www.rene-guenon.ch/Rene_Guenon/Guenon_Rene_-_La_crise_du_monde_moderne.pdf

Posted by: Fyi | Jan 23 2021 2:19 utc | 103

The Democrats will not lose the next election unless that election is at least semi-free. Which it may well not be.

Posted by: lysias | Jan 23 2021 2:25 utc | 104

In other news: Chuck Schumer spoke on the Senate floor today with a hilarious blooper, accusing Trump of “inciting the erection” (he meant insurrection).

Posted by: norecovery | Jan 23 2021 2:59 utc | 105

norecovery | Jan 23 2021 2:59 utc | 105

How do you know he meant that and not what he actually said?

Posted by: jiri | Jan 23 2021 3:07 utc | 106

This is the one which really irks me.

South African Olympic gold medalist Caster Semenya, who is a woman, has all the correct bits etc, has been barred from competing in any athletics competition because her testosterone levels are "too high".
It is important to point out that Ms Semenya's condition is 100% natural, apparently some women are born with naturally high levels of testosterone, but unlike those women born with longer than 'normal' legs, who are praised & encouraged to become sprinters, the IAF, who control all official athletics events about the planet have . . ."ruled that restricting testosterone levels in runners with "differences of sex development" is discriminatory but should be done anyway."

Maybe they knew that amerika was going to ruin womens' sport so got in first.
No because those athletes transiting from one gender to another are the only competitors permitted to take hormones. A woman trans to bloke can take testosterone to get his testosterone up to the same level as a bloke, just as a bloke transiting to a woman can take drugs to drop their levels.

Ms Semenya may not however.
I'm too old to play sport and have no desire to call out what I believe are probably crazy rules, let those who compete suffer the consequences of their (imo) stupidity, but the huge injustice done to women athletes such as Ms Semenya rankles even worse than the awful humiliations wreaked upon some Soviet Athletes such as Tamara and Irina Press when the capitalist world looking for any cold war victory they could finagle changed the rules to ban her. Semanya's humiliation is similar, but the Press sisters' injustice was 60 years ago when humans were far less aware of the complexity of our biochemistry.

Posted by: Debsisdead | Jan 23 2021 3:09 utc | 107

On a related topic the Guardian poses the question: "Joe Biden's Oval Office: What changes has he made?" Answer: he kept Trump's curtains and put up a portrait of Ben Franklin. With the honesty of the fool the Guardian has unintentionally admitted that the 'new broom' is not to be taken literally change under Bidet.

Posted by: Patroklos | Jan 23 2021 3:18 utc | 108

South African Olympic gold medalist Caster Semenya, who is a woman, has all the correct bits etc

Posted by: Debsisdead | Jan 23 2021 3:09 utc | 107

The one thing CS doesnt have is "all the correct bits"

In fact CS has almost none of the correct bits, and what bits CS does have are in the wrong place

It a pity that if people are going to make such authorative sounding pronouncements the least they could do is take the time to actually make some effort however meagre to educate themselves on the basics

Posted by: Triden | Jan 23 2021 3:20 utc | 109

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 22 2021 20:26 utc | 49 -- "Identifying" as female is all it will take, and there are no tests to determine identity. Identity is purely subjective. "Identity" is literally anything that the individual wants it to be, and trying to assert otherwise is flaccid pseudoscience nonsense."

The new king -- so exceedingly well-loved that he needed more soldiers than for Afghanistan and Iraq to keep the public away from his coronation -- has seemingly thrown a bone at the wokester portion Amedika. And on his very first day in office at that.

Could this unseemly hurry by this illegitimate ursurper point us to the Deep State's need to keep the nation divided?

If reality is whatever you 'identify' it as, then wouldn't the dog-fight over this latest bone be one for the ages?

This is insanity from the highest office in the brightest city on the highest hill in the most exceptionally indispensable nation on Earth.

So much for attending to pressing problems facing Amedika.


Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 22 2021 20:26 utc | 49 -- "Contradictions stemming from western society's delusion metastasize."

This is what swirling down a toilet bowl feels like. Those of us who are not caught up in the evil are duty-bound to point out the insanity just so a few can be saved. I once was lost, believing in American 'democracy', but now am saved because internet truth speakers did not stop pushing back against the CIA's daily press output. When the world is awash with lies, speaking truth is the only true revolutionary act.

Posted by: kiwiklown | Jan 23 2021 3:57 utc | 110

In other news: Chuck Schumer spoke on the Senate floor today with a hilarious blooper, accusing Trump of “inciting the erection” (he meant insurrection).

Posted by: norecovery | Jan 23 2021 2:59 utc | 105

Meager joys of gerontocracy. Bloopers. Trump, in the same age group, had trouble discussing nuclear forces at least a bit differently from overpriced condos and other properties for sale with various troubles carefully hidden:

"Our nuclear was getting very tired. Now we have it in, as we [ = people in the trade ] would say, tippy-top shape. Tippy top. We have new and we have renovated and it’s incredible.

So we will put all those who erect insectations on no-fly list.

Posted by: Piotr Berman | Jan 23 2021 3:58 utc | 111

Does this apply for prison sentences? Won't courts start seeing more and more defendants identifying as women if they think they may get get jail time?

Posted by: Hmm | Jan 23 2021 4:13 utc | 112

I'm going to say it: Anyone who says trans women are elligible for women's sport just because they identify themselves as female is stupid. Unless one take your hormonal therapy from teenage year, no testosterone surpression will able to nullify trans women biological advantage over women. Yes I said biological, the very thing that no matter how hard you try to mentally gymnastic way around is something that assigned to you at birth and could give you natural advantage in physicals activities. Heck even chess>/b> has men and women division separated despite it's mostly being a "brain" sport of sort. Why? Because even brain sport requires stamina and this what puts men at a advantage over women in chess: they just more able to drawn out a match longer and therefore could wait more for a female opponent to make mistake.

VK had it right. This is not about casual sport. It will be mostly about sport scholarships and grants that offers enough rewards for boys to trash away their dignity and 'compete' in female sports. Anyone of you who couldn't see this coming is pretty myopic and focused way too much on the stupid individual expression of gender.

Posted by: Hangar | Jan 23 2021 4:27 utc | 113

The true goal of these "left" shitlibs has always been to preserve the existing neoliberal imperial order, through IdPol divide-and-conquer tactics to distract the exploited masses from gaining class consciousness as much as possible.

Posted by: J W | Jan 23 2021 4:27 utc | 114

Posted by: bevin | Jan 22 2021 21:14 utc | 61 -- "This is not a matter of public toilet facilities or qualifying for the Olympics but of a class society sick to the point of requiring urgently to be put out of its misery...."

Thank you, Bevin, for stating it so well.

Yet, there are people who split hairs about the mechanics of transitioning, the rules of sports, etc.

It is like discussing the temperature of the water as they swirl down that Exceptional Toilet Bowl.

I can empathise with shithole nations are shitholes because they had been abused by centuries of colonialism. Some climb out of the toilet bowl better (China) than others (India).

But for the Indispensable Exceptional Nation to turn itself into a shithole? a toilet bowl? a bidet?

And so begins the reign of Bidet Biden, the new Stirrer-In-Chief, here to keep the Exceptional Toilet Bowl swirling.

Posted by: kiwiklown | Jan 23 2021 4:29 utc | 115

B. I've never been more disappointed that you're on the same page as Limbaugh and Todd Herman.

Posted by: Ivor Ulfsson | Jan 23 2021 4:32 utc | 116

Triden | Jan 23 2021 3:20 utc | 109 talks utter tosh with "The one thing CS doesnt have is "all the correct bits".

The murdoch media ran a horror campaign based on gossip and innuendo, but this article sets some of it straight.

In simple(ish) terms, there's a condition called Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, which occurs when a part of the Y chromosome doesn't do what it should.

Called the SRY gene, it's the instigator of male foetal development. Where it does its job properly, the male hormones ping off and the male foetus develops normally.

However, in a very small number of cases (perhaps one in 20,000 I understand), there's a malfunction and both female and male genitalia develop, albeit internally, and male hormones like testosterone, are largely held in check. . . .

. . .The IOC has concluded that people who present with the CAIS syndrome should be considered to be female, but there are variations along the way - and of course we don't yet know the full details of Semenya's case.

That is not what occurred, the girl raised as a girl and despite yellow journalism and ugly gossip to the contrary has primarily female genetic characteristics. If she did not she could have been barred under existing rules, but the sporting judiciary made a decision against its own rules making a determination on the basis of her testosterone levels.

See here:

Earlier analysis had revealed that Semenya's testosterone levels were three times the normal level for a woman.

The International Association of Athletics Federations received the results of Semenya's 'gender verification test' this week, but it has refused to confirm the findings until they have been verified by a panel of independent scientific experts and the athlete has been personally informed.

But Pierre Weiss, the IAAF secretary general, hinted strongly at the results on Thursday when he said: "It is clear that she is a woman, but maybe not 100 per cent. We have to see if she has an advantage from her possibly being between two sexes compared to the others."

The last woman to be tortured and publicly humiliated in this was also from a developing nation, an Indian woman Santhi Soundarajan who attempted suicide. She had won a silver medal at the Asian Games. Like Semanya her performance wasn't the 'out of this world' , neither broke world records, the stuff one would expect if a trained male athlete were competing with trained female athletes, it was within the performance range of other women athletes.
At the same time as woke dingbats are penalising all women sportspeople by creating rules for trans types, other women athletes are being barred from competing.

Posted by: Debsisdead | Jan 23 2021 5:10 utc | 117

You know what's funny? I've noticed that most supporting comment for trans women entering women sports come from those who don't pay particular attention to sport. Their lack of understanding on how sports work is appalling by saying that "training can overcome biological advantage". Yeah, try to tell the former to anyone who competes against Michael Phelps.

By only know half of the field, all of you are wrecking sports as whole with this nonsense.

Posted by: Hangar | Jan 23 2021 5:36 utc | 118

Could 'transgender' Assistant Sectary Dr Rachel Levine have anything to do with this?

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/19/biden-rachel-levine-health-secretary-460278

Posted by: Paul | Jan 23 2021 5:37 utc | 119

Posted by: Laguerre | Jan 22 2021 22:28 utc | 76

Don't you think this is the result of gender norm and expectation in the US? Trans women are more likely to stay with their choice because being a woman means that they are able to be more expressive. Despite what the liberals would like to led you to believe, the gender norm and expectation is still there and rigid as ever. Even trans acceptance works within the same framework.

Posted by: Hangar | Jan 23 2021 6:05 utc | 120

It is a day one executive order. Obviously it is of extreme importance to those among the faux left who supported Biden.

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 22 2021 21:27 utc | 68

Biden today also rescinded the Trump executive order reducing price for some drugs, insulin being one of them. He managed to satisfy some of those who donated to his campaign while at the same time diverting attention from this. It's a "oh look, a squirrel" moment.

Posted by: Tom | Jan 23 2021 6:17 utc | 121

@karlof1 | Jan 22 2021 23:03 utc | 80

With genetic engineering, we'll just clone ourselves while adding modifications to fix what we see as defects. Not solved yet is how to transfer one's personality so that the clone will actually be us, not just a physical copy without the same "software."

I wouldn't mind that, but only if there's an absolutely, totally guaranteed way to revert to the classic human genome if something goes wrong.

Posted by: Cyril | Jan 23 2021 6:17 utc | 122

There are two aspects of this story which would be alarming in a country other than AmeriKKKa.
1. It exposes POTUS Biden as a figurehead leader devoid of wit, imagination or skill. A Manager would not announce a change in The Rules without first bouncing the proposal off a variety of relevant and informed Interested Parties, if only to satisfy Himself that it passes the sniff test. He thus comes across as easily bamboozled by his aides/Puppet Masters.
2. If there is an upside to this change it's the probability that the Equal Pay for Women Crowd will use it to shame the remaining recalcitrant employers to FINALLY comply with the plethora of Equal Pay Acts which they've been side-stepping since Slavery was abolished.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Jan 23 2021 7:05 utc | 123

Hello james!!

Here's the book! Join Archive for free and read it for free, then you'll know what I know.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 23 2021 7:25 utc | 124

WAAAY our of the subject but

It seems that the Navalny saga is the false flag to start a color revolution in Russia.

Pay attention to what is going on.

Posted by: CarlD | Jan 23 2021 11:29 utc | 125

All the above comments suffer from one wrong assumption: Gender "change" may not be voluntary or a question of choice.

I taught in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia) in the early seventies and there were still some Sudanese servants that possibly had been slaves (although you didn't mention that in polite circumstances), left over from the period when the tribes still kept them.
Some were eunuchs. I don't know if they were neutered before or after being "employed". They were sought after as being excellent servants.

However, my wife and I, (we were very recently married) were reasonably accepted by the locals and the local Bedouin population, as we had water, and were invited to marriages. (Note that we were not part of those expats that were invited to the Prince's houses etc.). The women had a great time; songs, dances and no abbayas (masks or headgear.) The men sat outside listening to poets (only place I know where poets had Cadillacs, as they were highly thought of), and waiting for their wives (True !). At one, there was a young "boy" (?) who danced for the audience. It is almost sure that he was either naturally neutered or had been "converted". He danced better (read more sexy) than any girl could ever do.

So did he/they have any choice in the matter before being neutered?

In Europe, which is full of people "who know what is best for others", there are UK "official" groups specialised in "sex" therapy and change for very young children. Personally I think they are a lot of perverts setting up children for future consumption. But then I can have a nasty tongue.
In Ireland, children, (600 infants found in a sceptic tank), were mistreated and the Irish Government is in the process of apologising. Plus the scandals of unwed mothers and the actions of the "bonne soeurs" who were ..... appalling.
China had a policy of one child per family that has led to a lack of females. (That the Uighers have more is a point in favour of b's post earlier)
etc.etc.

The danger as I see it, are those who take their own desires for consent by immature children (or even adults). Children cannot defend their rights.

A "solution" is an absolute lower age limit before which no change or choice could be contemplated.

PS. The mental age of a child, used to be taken into account, ie, there is a period in which children "group" themselves by sex, "gangs", pre-puberty, puberty and so on. This is natural and there should be no reason to take advantage of this.

Posted by: Stonebird | Jan 23 2021 11:32 utc | 126

@126

"Septic" not "sceptic".... oops.

Posted by: Stonebird | Jan 23 2021 11:47 utc | 127

Stonebird @126

The issue needn't be so complex. What does the current culture determine that the statutory age limit is for children to consent to sex? In most western societies that I am aware of it is either sixteen or eighteen years of age. How can a child consent to mutilation of their genitalia prior to being considered competent to give consent to using their genitalia? Likewise, "grooming" a child for such mutilation is logically more horrifying than grooming them for sex.

The Russians have it right on this issue. Even hinting to underage children that hacking off/out their sex organs is some sort of "normal" should be a very serious crime.


Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 23 2021 11:57 utc | 128

Racquel Levine is the fastest rising "thing" in Democrat politics. You know it is your destiny to be ruled by that freak. Gods punishment for turning away from him and his son.

Posted by: Robert Browning | Jan 23 2021 12:00 utc | 129

Yes, this 'librul' LGBTQWERTY or the Russia! Russia! crap are distracting and so is the self inflicted belly shot of the Paris Climate change accord re-entry. Media fodder for Western middle class sheep.

These distractions are necessary to obscure US's Establishment real problems like the dollar's losing grip on all other economies and Xi Jinping's economical and physical counter imperialism drive.

Posted by: Antonym | Jan 23 2021 12:10 utc | 130

It is interesting that in these discussions of gender confusion the rare cases of genetic deformity, like Caster Semenya, are always trotted out as defense for bad policy.

There already exists Olympic competition for people with deformities. It is called the Special Olympics. That is where people with deformities and disorders should be competing. The previous Title IX classification for sports in the US is flexible enough to accommodate "diversity" as well. You have one classification for normal biological women who want to compete against other normal biological women, and then there is the classification for everyone else, as Caliman @1 points out. Though it is often thought of as "men's sports", anyone, including normal biological women, can choose to try and compete in them.

The only thing that Biden's day one executive order accomplishes is making it illegal to exclude biological males from sports that were previously exclusive to biological females. We know without question that this isn't about lowering the barriers to participation for people with genetic deformities because the executive order specifies identity as the criterion, and there is no medical or other empirical way to determine that.

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 23 2021 12:23 utc | 131

Not The Onion:

Rep. Guy Reschenthaler @GReschenthaler - 22:54 UTC · Jan 3, 2021

The prayer to open the 117th Congress ended with "amen and a-women."

Amen is Latin for "so be it."

It's not a gendered word.

Unfortunately, facts are irrelevant to progressives. Unbelievable.

[video]

Posted by: S | Jan 23 2021 12:37 utc | 132

I totally Agree. The "consent" age was an age at which people could vote as well as being considered "mature". The difference in a tribal society was the age at which you basically conquered fear and sometimes pain.. However some initiations were brutal.

The Tolai in PNG, (East New Britain), before being civilised had a "ritual" where a girl from the Bainings was taken prisoner, put in a hut for three days with the "initiates", then taken out and eaten.

("Baining" means "food" in Tolai language, or so I am told. The Baining families exchanged first born sons to preserve their bloodlines in case of capture).

But I digress. This "grooming" possibly happened in the past, but it seems to have taken on a life of it's own at the moment. The destruction of an ordered, cohesive society also seems to be the present objective. Destroy the family, friends, (masks and soc distancing) local sub-group cohesion, authority (Who were installed to Govern over us not to rule as despots), religion.

New formations are being thrust upon us; Military might, a "Rules based order" (not "law" under which we are all supposed to be equal), hereditary superiority, financial slavery. Gender bending follows the same aim of destroying normal guidelines. The young are not supposed to have any stable situations that they can refer to. So "guidance" in the form of strikingly bad options are fed to them as the "truth".

Many on MoA were brought up with "traditional" values. "Grooming" is the new term for "exploitable".

Posted by: Stonebird | Jan 23 2021 12:38 utc | 133

If you accept the philosophy of reincarnation, as over a billion people do, then you also accept that we are reborn over and over in both sexes and in all races. Leaving aside the implied stupidity of racism for now, it also suggests that spiritually we are neither male nor female but a composite of the two, our physical body with its hormones etc. then brings forth that aspect.

However sometimes for various reasons the opposite aspect dominates and we get gay or transgender. In all likelihood it is a karmic occurrence, as such there should be no discrimination for what is just an aspect of nature. No doubt prejudices are historically religious based.

That being said with the issue at hand, having transgender males compete in women's sport is an obvious absurdity, they have a lifetime of male growth giving them greater strength regardless of what hormones they are currently taking. There is no need or reason for the legislation except as another deliberate act to divide and conquer the population. Woke fake leftism is purely about that, I very much doubt those that enable such actually share the philosophy. The real left actually does have a philosophy, one unlikely to be ever embraced by the Davos crowd.

Posted by: Gravelrash | Jan 23 2021 12:52 utc | 134

"Transgender individuals are victims of hate crimes..."

Violence against LGBTQWERTY people was a campaign issue last year. Biden pointed out that 37 LGBTQWERTY Americans were murdered in 2019. If course, even one murder is too many, but is this some sort of sign of an epidemic of hate crime against LGBTQWERTY people?

There were 16,425 murders in the United States in 2019.
The US population was 328,000,000 in 2019.
Gallup says that 4% of the US population identifies as LGBTQWERTY.

When we do up the math we get a LGBTQWERTY population in the US of about 13,120,000.

37 people out of a population of 13,120,000 vs 16,425 people out of a population of 328,000,000? Is that really a crisis for gays in America?

OK, many people lack the number sense to clearly see it so I will break it down a little further.

Murder rate per million:
LGBTQWERTY: 2.82
Everyone else: 50.1

Perhaps there is a perception in America of a crisis of hate crimes against LGBTQWERTY people, but that is nothing more than a perception created by mass media histrionics and deliberate disinformation about a phantasmagorical explosion of homophobic, misogynistic white supremacy in America. It is just as imaginary and manufactured as the perception that there has been a massive increase in hate crimes by white supremacists against Black Americans.

Get your silly hysteria under control, America! Stop being led around by the nose by mass media.

It is far safer to be gay in America than it is to be straight.

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 23 2021 13:04 utc | 135

As an off-topic aside to my post above, it is also an unfortunate fact that it is safer to be Black in an all-white neighborhood in America than to be Black in an all-Black neighborhood.

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 23 2021 13:14 utc | 136

#132

Just to be clear, “amen” comes from Biblical Hebrew, not Latin, and, of course, real progressives have nothing to do with this idiocy.

By the way, I hope nobody here ever dares to utter the sexist term “ramen,” which is deeply offensive and hurts women economically by discouraging them from pursuing lucrative careers in the noodle-making industry. Only use “ramen and rawomen” (or “raperson” for short).

Posted by: S | Jan 23 2021 13:14 utc | 137

Transphobic BS. Trans women have been competing in women's sports for decades...without winning a thing. They been able to compete in the Olympics since 2004...and none have even qualified.

If cis and trans women were 100% equal in ability, then 2-4 medals would have been won by trans women at the last Olympics...none even qualified.

Apart from anything else (like the strict hormone rules), only 6 in every 1,000 women is a trans woman. It's mathematically impossible for them to 'dominate women's sports'.

Transphobes have been claiming that trans women 'will destroy women's sports' for *checks notes* ..45 years now.

Posted by: Lisa | Jan 23 2021 14:22 utc | 139

Lisa @139

Biden's executive order isn't about postoperative transsexuals but about males who choose to identify as females. It isn't transphobia to be offended by stupidity, and stupidity includes not being able to tell the difference between individuals who have had their genitalia excised and people who just "identify" in their minds as being something other than what they really are.

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 23 2021 14:42 utc | 140

"Issues like the above, which is plainly unreasonable for anyone not drunk on 'librul' LGBTQWERTY cool aid, are a major reason why the U.S. is losing international respect."

Actually respect for the US rose massively when Biden won and did that (and ended the US's opposition to abortion). It was LGBTI (and woman) hating Trump that dragged it down, ending up the most unpopular President in American History.

You forget that at least 10% of the population are LGBTI. 3% are lesbians or gay men(LG), 5% are bisexual (B), 0.6% are trans (T) and 1.7% are intersex (I). Surveys in multiple countries show ever increasing ..majority..support for them, except amongst the tiny and dwindling far right and religious extremists. In Australia the vote for marriage equality was won by the YES case by a large majority.

Posted by: Lisa | Jan 23 2021 14:54 utc | 141

Lisa @141

It is sad that you cannot see through your own delusion. Most "Deplorables" support other people having different lifestyle choices. They just don't want creepy guys being allowed to use the same public restrooms as their daughters, or their daughters having to compete in their soccer league against teams full of creepy guys. Those "Deplorables" will fully support the creepy guys having a league of their own, or even playing in the regular guys' leagues, assuming the regular players don't have to be handicapped to allow the creepy guys to compete.

The raging delusions middle class white people in the West have create so many toxic contradictions in their societies, and the seem totally oblivious to those delusions. It is sad, and a tragedy for western culture.

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 23 2021 15:15 utc | 142

This executive order only perains to the USA.I doubt it will pass in international competition.There are paralympics for the handicapped,maybe we should wait for transgender olympics,quite a freak-show i bet.

Although hitting hard the piano is not an olympic discipline,I doubt there are any male players able to out-speed this nice young lady :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiR4Rc3kjBs

Posted by: willie | Jan 23 2021 15:34 utc | 143

Of course the catholic church uses a lot of "amen"s.It's not latin though.In arabic it means "truthful","faithful" and I suppose in arameic or other semitic languages the root AMN has about the same meaning.

Posted by: willie | Jan 23 2021 15:40 utc | 144

I'm more worried about my future energy costs, and the energy jobs that will be lost forever. Yeah I know green energy to the rescue. And yet at the same time Joe will be expanding the military in places like Syria that are fighting for fossil fuels and pipelines. Odd...not really. Still it is too bad about some biological girls not getting their college athlete scholarships to be trained in neoliberalism stupidity. See there is a silver lining.

Posted by: Old and Grumpy | Jan 23 2021 15:44 utc | 145

The issue boils down for me to the trannies insistence that I acknowledge their mental illness as if it were objectively "true".

Dress how you want, call yourself what you want, act how you want, but to insist that I must deny the evidence of my eyes and ears, that I must acknowledge thete is no difference between some bloke in a dress and an adult human female, is a step too far.

It is Orwell's O'Brien and the Party's insistence that not only must I say 2+2=5 but that I must come to believe that 2+2=5, brought to life.

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities”

These people insit that an obviously-male tranny's penis is really a "woman penis".

Its absurd and its purpose is both to train humans to deny the evidence of their senses and to deny us any meaningful vocabulary to describe what we see and hear.

Posted by: Triden | Jan 23 2021 15:47 utc | 146

Of course,
If we elect to stop using the 'invisible can't prove shit somewhere fucking elseville vote counting corporation', and start counting our own stuff for ourselves (because we happen to be able to count, and read), maybe we won't keep having this type of problem.

Posted by: Josh | Jan 23 2021 16:11 utc | 147

@William Gruff #128:

The Russians have it right on this issue. Even hinting to underage children that hacking off/out their sex organs is some sort of "normal" should be a very serious crime.

It is not illegal in Russia to discuss gender reassignment with minors or even to promote gender reassignment to minors. The law passed in 2013 (in Russian) prohibits “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations to minors.” So, for example, one can’t promote sex between men or sex between women or group sex to minors. I don’t know if BDSM and role reversal (“pegging”) are included in the law’s definition of “non-traditional sexual relations.”

Gender reassignment in Russia follows a protocol. One must first consult with a psychiatrist, who may or may not diagnose “transsexualism” (F64.0 in ICD-10). Sometimes the diagnosis allows one to immediately start taking hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery. Other times, only hormones are allowed immediately, while the permission to undergo sex reassignment surgery takes up to two years of observation. Both require permission from parents if one is less than 18 years old. Neither are covered or even subsidized by the government, which in my opinion is wrong, as surgery is expensive and hormones must be taken for the rest of one’s life. When/if one is 18 or older, a special commission composed of a sexologist, a psychiatrist and a psychologist issues a certificate that gives one the right to be issued new documents with the new gender (and new gendered forms of the patronymic and the last name).

The problem is that, if one wants to really look like the opposite sex, one has to start taking hormones early. And for that to happen, parents must be receptive to the idea that their child may be of a different gender. It requires education of parents. By the way, if our society was better at identifying transgender people early and giving them hormones early, there would be no problem with admitting transwomen to women’s sports as their bone structure would be similar to XY women (Androgen insensitivity syndrome, Swyer syndrome), who are already admitted to women’s sports.

Posted by: S | Jan 23 2021 16:44 utc | 148

Also "On Day 1" ...

A Large US Military Convoy Rolled Into Syria On 1st Day Of Biden Presidency

We're Back Baby! Bomb'n Biden says "Come on Man" We're Off to War....... by Fred

Anyone surprised by this should see b's post: "Biden Administration's 'New' Foreign Policy Is The 'More Of The Same' Old One"

<> <> <> <>

Trump apologists that effused: "Trump hasn't started any new wars!" will be undeterred. Zionist Biden hasn't started a new wars either (so far) - he's just doubling down on what Bush, Obama, and Trump have done.

The continuity of policy is uncanny and goes largely unnoticed by partisan Kool-Aid drinkers of the Left and Right that are pitted against each other (probably with some help from the "Radical Centrists").

BOHICA!

!!

Posted by: Jackrabbit | Jan 23 2021 16:52 utc | 149

Although radical trans rights tend to be bundled as a 'progressive' package together with gay rights, they actually contradict gay and lesbian rights as well as women's rights.

A teenage woman in the past growing up being attracted to her own sex would understand herself as lesbian woman, while now she may be under pressure to see herself as a trans man instead, and may be encouraged to take puberty-blockers which can cause lasting damage.

‘I was not born in the “wrong body”’

‘When I was questioning my identity there was nowhere to find support that didn’t affirm the delusion of being in the “wrong body”. No organisations existed that might be able to tell me that it was okay to be a girl who didn’t like stereotypically “girly” things, and that I was no less female because I am same-sex attracted.

It was always a central tenet of feminism that being a woman isn't necessarily about wearing lipstick and a dress, but current trans activism reinforces those stereotypes.

Posted by: Ash Naz | Jan 23 2021 17:03 utc | 150

Other articles on this subject from the writer of the one linked to above, Jo Bartosch

Posted by: Ash Naz | Jan 23 2021 17:13 utc | 151

the real question, however, is how will this executive order affect sports gambling???

not only is the American body heroic, it's inclusive!

fuck sports. how much sports-related b.s. saturates the US media simply to foster an illusion of normalcy (see, e.g., seattletimes.com), normal meaning militarized competitiveness, starting in the g.d. education system? the games are funeral games, a la Iliad 23, but now with more nukes. can't wait for the Fukushima Olympics, can you? The Australian Open means an Australia open for business!

thankfully the coronavirus is gonna keep Murka from scratching its head too long on whether this order "from" Senator Drool Cup (D-MBNA) is "good" or "bad."

football and pickups.

Posted by: jason | Jan 23 2021 17:46 utc | 152

@ 124 karlof1... thanks.... i have too much on the go, but i believe you and what i think the book is getting at!

Posted by: james | Jan 23 2021 17:52 utc | 153

Declaring that, in any conflict between gender norms and biology, that it is biology that must be wrong- that men who 'act' and 'feel' like women must in fact literally be women- is the height of reaction. Nothing comes from nothing, so what are these amorphous feelings based on? The existing socio-cultural trappings of gender, the repressive gender norms that progressive people once struggled against. By transgenderist logic, it is exactly these repressive socio-cultural trappings of gender that define one's sex, male or female, and nothing else: biology must be bent to fit gender norms via hormone therapy and the surgeon's knife.

Posted by: strannik | Jan 23 2021 17:52 utc | 154

Declaring that, in any conflict between gender norms and biology.

Posted by: strannik | Jan 23 2021 17:52 utc | 154

It is the logical conclusion of the idiotic pretence that there is something we can objectively identify as "gender" which is separate from "biological sex".

Its all made-up nonsense, invented by pseudo-intellectuals and fake "academics"

Posted by: Triden | Jan 23 2021 18:00 utc | 155

this is ot but related..

@ 149 jackrabbit... not sure if you saw sen rand pauls talk with blinken.. video - sen rand paul questions state nominee blinken on regime change.

my problem with rand paul is his focus on regime change, while valid overlooks the very large elephant in the room - the war machine is a huge industry for both the military complex and wall st... rand paul doesn't address any of this.. it is purely on the basis of regime change being wrong.. i agree with him, but if he is unwilling to acknowledge how this business and money that is being generated is some minor thing, he is unwilling to challenge his own country directly... so he gets some points, but is missing the bigger issue as i see it..

Posted by: james | Jan 23 2021 18:04 utc | 156

"I want 100 cis vs trans high school wrassling matches in my 1st 100 days!" how many kids in this country are malnourished? diabetic? what percentage of school bathrooms are unsafe? yet need i wonder how the stock market reacted to President MBNA's order? schools are safe! now even safer, thanks to Chief Executive Safe Hands.

Posted by: jason | Jan 23 2021 18:12 utc | 157

Also, and more importantly, and costly in terms of potential lives lost, A Large US Military Convoy Rolled Into Syria On 1st Day Of Biden Presidency: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/large-us-convoy-rolled-syria-1st-day-biden-presidency

Posted by: Kouros | Jan 23 2021 18:14 utc | 158

I would love to see a nip and tuck compete on the asymmetric bars

Posted by: Helen | Jan 23 2021 19:00 utc | 159

@Kouros158 & Others

Does that mean Venezuela is "safe" for now?

Posted by: Tannenhouser | Jan 23 2021 19:13 utc | 160

S @ 148:

There are many troubling issues with what you suggest in your last paragraph, nearly all of which have been discussed in earlier comments.

"Transgender women" are now defined to include men who dress as women or who wish to occupy women's public physical spaces (such as public toilets) but who otherwise have no desire to transition to the opposite sex.

Children and young people are not deemed capable of giving consent to sexual relations under a certain age (because they are yet to reach psychological maturity; and while they are still developing, they may be vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation) so you need to demonstrate how they can give consent to changing their sex. A veritable industry of therapists and interest groups with the collusion of governments and pharmaceutical firms involved in transitioning children and adolescents from one sex to another has arisen. You need to ask why it seems easier to transition youngsters rather than deal with the discriminations that young people experiencing same-sex attraction or discovering they may be homosexual have.

Giving hormones and puberty blockers to young people changes their bodies in ways that are not necessarily equivalent to what women born with syndromes (where they may be chromosomally male but do not develop as male because the Y chromosome has a malfunction or something else overpowers it) experience as they grow up. Puberty blockers carry the risk of affecting proper bone development and causing later long-term health issues like osteoporosis. People having undergone gender reassignment might become a significant burden on their families as they may always need hormone treatment for the rest of their lives plus medication to deal with all the side effects of that treatment.

Posted by: Jen | Jan 23 2021 20:29 utc | 161

#132

My understanding is that the Special Olympics were conceived originally to promote sporting and physical health and education opportunities for people with intellectual disability / cognitive impairment. The movement seems to have broadened since to now operated 'in tandem' with the Paralympics

I've found the background information about athletes with'abnormal' or
'edge of spectrum' endocrine function in this thread interesting.The problem here seems to me to be the opposite or antithesis of disability, in that it can in some cases confer a natural or innate advantage to some individuals ( in the thread context, a small number of affected biological females) in some narrow and specific functional domain (here athletics, etc).

In such (presumably rare) cases, this simplest approach would seem to me to allow participation and inclusion but to also formally recognise and take into consideration any exceptionally high degree of competitive advantage that may obtain.

Posted by: johnF | Jan 24 2021 0:09 utc | 162

William Gruff #140

Wrong. Each sport has rules about trans men and trans women, it not just 'identifying' they have to drop testosterone and take estrogen with strict limits set. Trans men take testosterone.

People who are not trans, always underestimate how powerful the effects HRT are. In trans women blood cell count drops (VO2max drop thus stamina drops), muscles fade away (strength fade away), fat distribution changes, breasts grow, skin thins, etc. This is even more so for trans female adolescents..who never have a male puberty, they have female one.

The converse is true for trans men, they grow more muscles, their red cell count increases.

Multiple studies show that meeting the rules trans women have no advantage...in fact 30 years of sports records at all levels show they have a disadvantage. No sport, anywhere, has a trans woman competing at the top level.

Stastistically their success rate is at least 100th what it should be by numbers alone. Now few will compete anyway (let alone win) because there are so few of them, only 6 in every 1,000 women is a trans woman, however their competing rate is far less than that, and their win rate even lower.

So it's a transphobic BS, right wing (especially the religious right who hate all LGBTI people) lies.

45 years ago...yes 45 years..the exact same bigots were claiming the exact same things. So you'd think that anyone with any sort of intelligence would conclude ..with 45 years of evidence.. that it is not true.

Posted by: Lisa | Jan 24 2021 1:18 utc | 163

Trans people are fed up with the same old lies being brought up year after year..when year after year they are shown to be untrue.

Biden just reversed a Trump ruling allowing ALL LGBTI people to be discriminated against at work, in schools, sports, etc. Prior to that the vary same things that everyone thinks is new and 'the end of the world' happened...for years...with no issues.

And that is what really pisses LGBTI people off...none of you..not Bernard..complained when Trump ruled to let discrimination against us start.

Where were your 'concerns' when Trump ruled we could be fired?

I have a trans friend who served honorably in the USAF...in fact was honored at the White House. When they left they joined the Reserves.

Thanks to Trump they were kicked out of the Reserves and fired from their Govt job, just for being transgender (and they lost their house).

That OK? Is hateful bigotry acceptable to you? OK to fire LGBTI people just for who they are? That's far (and religious) right stuff that has no place in a civilized society.

Posted by: Lisa | Jan 24 2021 1:30 utc | 164

The USA isn't an enlightenment agenda now and never was in reality. Our first identity in understanding being human is to identify what sexual gender we are born as. First power in acceptance of extreme danger is brutal honesty.

https://english.pravda.ru/opinion/145567-biden_deception/

Critical mass is exposing it's time for being ready in the sustainable direction, off the grid carpi deim!

Posted by: RK | Jan 24 2021 1:52 utc | 165

A transgender~aka~transsexuals via medical science told me in the 1990s "it's a deathless death, you're not a male nor female"

Choosing to enslave is diabolical, vampirism = vile. Freedom is a virtue. Cognitive dissonance is psycho warfare.

Tao practices teach 9 Houses (brain) cultivation exercises. Emperors of China long ago, also unenlightened see Sun Tzu, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, et al.

Posted by: RK | Jan 24 2021 2:11 utc | 166

But you'd best know you'll be fired and mistreated should you publicly express the opinion that people like Rachel Levine are clearly disturbed and maybe shouldn't hold high office.
-
Posted by: erik | Jan 22 2021 18:42 utc | 20

What are the odds that she was promoted to be U.S. Assistant Secretary for Health except because she was a two-fer? Especially after the miserable job she did in Pennsylvania. Check out her picture at Wikipedia, and laugh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Levine

Posted by: eta | Jan 24 2021 7:23 utc | 167

S #137

I simmer my ramen for 4 minutes, three for rawomen, longer for rather (not 'rathey' as the y chromosome is taboo).

Posted by: uncle tungsten | Jan 24 2021 8:33 utc | 168

How on earth does anyone now play cards ?

"OK, I've a gender neutral pair of queens to your vaquely superior, without being sexist mind, thing-king"
"Oh, Jack that, I've a royal flush".

Full house anyone?

Posted by: Stonebird | Jan 24 2021 12:22 utc | 169

Many world sports federations have clear protocols to address each and every problem you listed, b. Trans women are only allowed to compete in official volleyball matches after SRS, years of HRT (which in turn leads to brittler bones and weaker muscles, like an artificial menopause) and they're submitted to a tighter testosterone limit compared to cis women. If the US are too fucked up to abide to such reasonable rules it's not the T community's fault.

Posted by: Miranda | Jan 24 2021 12:44 utc | 170

Lisa @163

You are clearly an idiot so I will put it simply: Biden's misogynistic executive order only applies to school sports for schools accepting federal funding, not professional sports.

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 24 2021 12:53 utc | 171

Time to google transgender fetwa

Posted by: Islam | Jan 24 2021 19:43 utc | 172

Agree. "Identity Politis" (and gender politics is part of that) is tearing the US (and the rest of the western world) more and more apart.

Posted by: Willy2 | Jan 24 2021 20:24 utc | 173

Gruff@171

Looks like heshe needs to have it made simple.
Then I remembered a discussion 4 years ago

Never got a reply

Posted by: estouxim | Jan 25 2021 1:19 utc | 174

Lisa @Jan 24 1:18 #163 and @Jan24 1:30 #164

Thanks for contributing the trans perspective to the discussion once again. Seems to me that no discussion is complete without that perspective.

There's a trans woman that had to relocate to Germany because she was mapping connections between right-wing supremists. I'd like to know more about that but I can't find info about her.

!!

Posted by: Jackrabbit | Jan 25 2021 3:20 utc | 175

LOL

What kind of nonsensical dirtbag-left/TERFy bullsh*t is this, esp. for a "progressive" or "left" website??

Posted by: John | Jan 31 2021 6:56 utc | 176

« previous page

The comments to this entry are closed.