|
Little Was Changed By The First Round of The Civil Wars Of 2020
The first round of the civil wars of 2020 seems to be over. It did not change much.
Unjustifiable police violence against one man was documented on video. This enabled the issue to spread. Protest, first local then nationwide and even internationally, followed. The police reacted to it with more unjustifiable police violence. This was again documented on video - one collection of these now has 282 entries – and spread further.
The police did not exclude the media from its attacks as it usually does. It even seemed to especially target these. That again amplified the echo of its violence.
Thus the police and its supporters have lost the argument.
In parallel to the protests some looting happened. President Trump and many other 'law and order' people saw the violence against property as a more important issue that the police violence against people – especially against people of color.
Trump reacted by calling up the military and a myriad of federal police forces to 'dominate the battlespace' of Washington DC and other cities.
They cleared a peace- and lawful demonstration from Lafayette Square near the White House for a photo-op. The move was illegal but will likely have no legal consequences.
Five well known retired 4-star generals, Dempsey, Kelly, Mullen, Mattis, Allen, protested against the proposed abuse of the military. The active commander of pacific air forces, a 4-star African-American, published a moving video with his thoughts on the issue. On this the military is not on Trump's side.
Thus Trump and his supporters have lost the argument.
That the police and Trump lost their arguments unfortunately does not mean that anything within the U.S. will change.
The military will not correct the issues the situation exposed. Political corruption at the federal as well as the local level is bipartisan and too engrained:
Cuomo, his party and New York’s legislative leaders have raked in more than $1 million from police unions as they have refused to enact a bill proponents say would deter police violence.
Opposition candidate Joe Biden responded to the issue of institutionalized racism with a dog whistle comment: Joe Biden says '10-15%' of Americans 'are just not very good people'. Well of course not. Some 13% of U.S. citizens are black. Given Biden's racist history – supporting segregation, writing the crime bill, lying about marching with the civil rights movement etc. – it is highly unlikely that he chose that range by chance. There is zero evidence that he would change a thing.
The protests will soon die down. But the divide within the U.S. public will only deepen. Trump voters will call themselves the 'Trump Army' and wear the camouflage 'Keep America Great' hat to fight the 'Liberal MOB'. Liberals will respond with pro-black gestures but without follow up actions. Writing 'black lives matter' on a DC street or changing the name of a place does nothing for blacks when the police can continue as before. Racist attacks in the U.S. will only increase.
What has changed is the public image of the U.S. throughout the world. Years of careful branding and propaganda have been put to waste. No U.S. ambassador can now express concerns about police violence in a foreign country without being laughed at. The U.S. has been put on crisis watch and in my estimate will stay there for quite a while.
The current economic situation makes it certain that the civil war continues. The next round is likely to be more violent. The empire is sinking in front of our eyes.
I both agree and disagree with b on this one. “Little changed” doesn’t do justice to what just happened (and continues).
My analogy: the ground shook and foundations were weakened but not big building fell.
See my recap from the previous thread for more.
The establishment response is a combination of 1) attempting to undermine the legitimacy of the protests, 2) scare-mongering about the the effort to reign-in the police state, and 3) a bi-partisan effort to channel protester grievances into the political process where it can be publicly smothered. Notice the constant refrain that Floyd’s death and is mere police brutality and that blacks alone are responsible for their problems. NemesisCalling | Jun5 20:07 @25 offers a prime example of this:
… blacks need to get their house in order… They need to distance themselves from BLM and Antifa [allies, and] … They need to realize that police brutality is a problem which affects all colors in America …
Where are the black leaders …
By “black leaders”, I suppose Nemesis means what Black Agenda Report calls the black misleadership class – politicians and ‘community organizers’ that have been compromised by the establishment. They’ve been “leading” the black community into a ditch for thirty years (which few care about until some outrage sparks protests).
I feel that it’s important that we not ignore this part of Nemesis’ comment:
I am warning you, you do so at your own peril and will be judged harshly for inciting blacks and minorities further down self-defeating and destructive avenues.
Why is support for justice – whether led by “black and minorities” an “incitement”? And why is their struggle presumed to be “self-defeating and destructive”? History shows that Movements for societal change are ALWAYS depicted in this way by the establishment and potential supporters of those Movements are ALWAYS warned off.
<> <> <> <> <>
Is anyone surprised that just as the establishment made “police brutality” the core issue, we saw white police officers being inexplicably brutal to protesters? In one particularly memorable incident (which went ‘viral’), a heavyset white officer (apparently a former Marine), violently shoved a thin young woman named Dounya Zayer to the ground in NYC. A Newsweek reporter just happened to be there to record it. The officer and his commanding officer continue walking after the shove, ignoring the young woman’s distress.
Strangely, the young woman (20 or 21 years of age) has social media accounts that are relatively recent. Her Twitter account started only in May 2020, and her Instagram has only 104 posts – containing vapid images, many being of herself in various uninteresting poses.
When she gave a statement to the police demanding that NYPD be held accountable, she was accompanied by a women (her mother?) with an Islamic head dress. Dounya is an women’s name in Islamic communities. In Islam, dunyā (Arabic: دُنْيا ) refers to the temporal world and its earthly concerns and possessions, as opposed to the hereafter (ʾākhirah). As a girls name, “Dounya” is considered to mean “Earth”. Other than European-based Islamic communities, the name is most popular in Morocco, Lebanon, and Turkey.
I haven’t found much information about Zayer as a surname. As a US surname, it appears to be very rare. However, “Zayer” is also a Quranic name (for boys):
Zayer is another spelling of the boy name Zayir. They are the same name and have the same meaning and pronunciation. Both spellings are acceptable.
Zayir is an Arabic name for boys that means “roaring lion” if derived from the Z-HAMZ-R root. It can also be a simplified version of Zaa’ir, derived from the Z-W-R root, which means “one visits [someone]”.
If fully derived from Islam, her name would be a combination of: Earth/Earthly + Visiting. A cute cover-name?
Here is globintel.com report about the NYPD officer (Note: I can’t verify the accuracy of the report).
A mysterious Arabic woman. A former Marine (where did he serve?). And Newsweek. Nothing to see here?
!!
Posted by: Jackrabbit | Jun 6 2020 0:39 utc | 74
|