Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 11, 2020
How The Coronavirus Killed The Shale Industry

The answer to the question OPEC++ or a dead shale industry? is in.

The shale oil industry will die. I may come back in the future but that will be years from now.

The coronavirus pandemic has cut oil demand from 100 million barrels per day to some 75 Mbpd. Oil prices have fallen from $60 per barrel to $20/bl.

On Thursday OPEC+, the original oil producer cartel plus Russia, agreed formally to cut output by 10 million barrels per day. The real promised cuts would have been smaller. But the agreement depended on the commitment of all OPEC members.

Mexico did not agree to a cut. The country has hedged nearly all its oil exports:

Mexico, the world’s 12th-largest producer of oil, has hedged much of its 2020 output — that is, agreed ahead of time to a set price, reportedly about $49 a barrel. That practically eradicates any incentive Mexico might have to go along with production cuts this year.

At $1.3 billion the hedge was expensive for Mexico. But it guarantees that its budget for this year is fully covered. Mexico also redirected parts of its export to its own refineries to produce gasoline which it would otherwise have imported.

OPEC+ had also expected that other producers, the U.S., Canada, Brazil, would agree to cut their production by 5 Mbpd. Together with the 10 Mbpd from OPEC+ that would have helped to keep the oil price from sinking further. Yesterday a meeting of the G-20 countries was held to discuss the issue. None of them commited to hard cuts or quotas. Canada denied Russian assertions that it would cut 1 Mbpd. The U.S. rejected cutting more than what was already shut in for a lack of market. There will be no OPEC++.

Yesterday Trump talked again with Putin. He was told that there is no deal without Mexico and the other American producers committing to one. Trump then promised to somehow make up for Mexico:

By Friday afternoon, Trump was suggesting the U.S. falloff was sufficient to cover Mexico’s burden, as well — apparently without any sort of presidential order or quotas imposed by Washington.

It is questionable that OPEC+ will accept Trump's assertion as being equal to an official cut of Mexico's output. There is then no deal. While the OPEC countries will claim to stick to their official quotas to avoid U.S. pressure everyone will cheat and try to sell as much as possible.

Russia, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries may still cut some production. But the reason for that will not be Thursday's OPEC+ deal but a lack of demand and no room left to store surplus oil.

It means that the price of oil will move below $20/bl until demand comes back from its current 75 Mbpd to above 90 Mbpd. That can only happen when the coronavirus pandemic has ebbed, when the quarantines have ended and air traffic resumes at a sufficient rate. That point will probably come two years from now. But the effects of the global depression the pandemic will cause will take even longer to heal. When demand finally comes back to previous levels a rise in oil prices will still be much delayed because all storage is now full and must be sold off before more crude production can go back online.

U.S. shale oil was marginally profitable above $45/bl. That price is out of reach for the next to three to five years. That is much longer than the shale oil companies will be able to finance themselves. U.S. banks, which have loaned billions to those companies, are already getting ready to seize their assets. The banks will lose most of the $100+ billion they invested in shale companies. 

Canada's expensive oil sand production is also unsustainable under the current prices.

The oil industries in North America had been free riding on the previous OPEC+ deals which limited production in countries which can produce at much lower costs. The artificially upheld prices have broken down and there is no way that they will come back any time soon.

This is a catastrophe for the labor market in the U.S. oil patch. Especially as the job losses will come on top of those in other services and industries.

It is also catastrophic for those Persian Gulf countries that depend on oil sales to finance their budgets. Iraq will be hit very hard and the lack of money may cause it to fall apart. The Saudi 'royals' will no longer be able to finance the welfare state that has held down any serious challenges to their ruling.

Alternative energy producer may also become a casualty of lower oil prices as they are no longer competitive. With low gasoline prices electric cars will lose their advantage of cheap electricity.

Trump had argued for a disengagement of the U.S. from the Middle East as the U.S. had achieved independence from foreign energy. With the shale oil industry on its death bed the U.S. will again have to import oil from the Middle East. While Trump's disengagement was never fully carried out the new situation may lead him to change his strategy.

Comments

David F | Apr 12 2020 4:35 utc | 67 (Orlov, fubar and collapse)
The esteemed Orlov builds on much older idea, stands upon old shoulders. (but he’s pretty sloppy with reading emails)
Szilard (the boffin who thought of and patented the abomb) authored “The Voice of the Dolphins”… There, inter alia, the Dolphin speaks to the similarities shared between USSR and USA…
From that discussion it’s obvious that these two States are (were) actually a complimentary couple. If one failed…then the other must also. One, everybody knows (and some gloat), has failed. With that, the runaway train ride began…
Wm Pfaff wrote an essay about the 1,2,3…of failures based on Szilard’s idea in VoD.
October 2018> “Will the Pentagon Be the Next U.S. Institution to Crash?”
Szilard conceived the damn gadget in 1933 “On the morning of September 12, 1933, on a miserable, wet, quintessentially English autumn day, at the intersection where Russell Square meets Southampton Row.”
About the “next institution”…many have since ’08 indeed krappedout…and recently the navy had a mutiny, of of a number of mutinies. It is a near mutiny to circulate a round-robbin, and a crime to sign one…which many have done.

Posted by: Walter | Apr 12 2020 14:41 utc | 101

Norwegian @92: “The problem is that oil is too cheap, not that it is too expensive.”
American oil is too expensive, and that is America’s problem. We’re discussing the shale oil industry here, remember? That stuff is too expensive.
America was the first country to heavily exploit its domestic petroleum reserves. Thus it is not a surprise that it is also the first to hit the peak and start going down the other side. Is America producing lots of oil now? Sure, but at immense cost that requires massive subsidies to pretend that it is marketable. Even when there is no longer any hydrocarbons to be extracted from the ground, if you pay enough you can still produce oil. That doesn’t mean peak oil hasn’t passed. Even after the last drop of oil is squeezed from the stone, if people don’t mind paying dozens of dollars per gallon then they can still have gasoline, it’s just that gasoline will have to be synthesized from other feedstocks.

Posted by: William Gruff | Apr 12 2020 15:14 utc | 102

> Can’t wait for the demise of the corrupt reneables hoax
Indeed. Industrial windmills are a racket. They consistently underproduce and fail early, not to mention the huge resources required for concrete bases, new roads, new powerlines, and adverse effects on humans and other critters that live nearby.
They are in my backyard (well, 15 miles but I can still see them) and rural landscapes will be littered with tall rusted skeletons for a hundred years. Maybe longer. ‘Cuz we all know damn well that when the last dollar is squeezed out, the owners will file bankruptcy and abandon their precious “green” windmills. Just like drillers will abandon a million oil wells.
We are all going to be getting lessons in reality. In general people think that the future will simply be an extension of the present, only better. But it never happens that way. Forty years ago I concluded that eventually, at some unpredictable date, the US house of cards would hit the wall. This is the first time I have felt certain that Uncle Sam is now approaching the wall at high speed and will not even try to apply any brakes.
God help us all, if there is one, ‘cuz we are sure gonna need it.

Posted by: Trailer Trash | Apr 12 2020 15:16 utc | 103

Walter @101
Thanks for the authors. I found the internet archive and have downloaded the VoD. Do you know the name of the article by pfaff? A search shows 13 books and numerous essays.
I didn’t know these were not his (orlov)original ideas. He is very intelligent, but is thin skinned concerning criticism, and can be quite a dick sometimes. I still find him worth reading though.

Posted by: David F | Apr 12 2020 15:47 utc | 104

@ 67 david f… i read this article yesterday and it reminds me of the general thrust of your post…
Farmers Got Billions From Taxpayers In 2019, And Hardly Anyone Objected
but i often think there is no such thing as a farmer in the usa anymore… there are agriculture corporations that the farmers are feeding into.. it is all big business now and the idea of a farmer working outside this culture is mostly antiquated.. it is the corporations getting the handouts, not the farmers..
Corporate Control in Agriculture
i get some of my ideas from reading wendell berry books.. at one time working on the land – on a ”farm” was what a huge number of people did… then there was the migration to cities for other types of work.. we are like an uprooted culture with no connection to the land anymore.. corn and soybeans are the big farms of today… it is a monoculture, not a diverse culture.. i guess this is sort of OT..

Posted by: james | Apr 12 2020 16:03 utc | 105

Anyone want to take a stab at answering the following:
Why are some respected alt-media embracing a police state?
Posted by: Allen | Apr 12 2020 13:41 utc | 95

It is puzzling, isn’t it? Normally rational people become so fearful of infection that they lose all sense of measure and balance, and so fearful that they cannot see what is in fact supremely dangerous.
I’ll give an anecdotal example which I think is useful to (partially) understand the phenomenon: my mother always used to say that when people buy or sell houses, their behaviour becomes very ugly and quite different from their normal behaviour – it brings out the worst in their personality. (Meaning, for example, dishonesty about their intentions during negotiations, agreeing to sell then selling to someone else, etc etc, which can cause a whole chain of causally related transactions to fail). The thing is that in normal daily transactions there is much less at stake, while the value of a house is very high, and has powerful implications for our security. In the case of infectious diseases, there are some related processes (and some unrelated). An infectious disease – especially one which is “novel” and unfamiliar, as opposed to normal flu – has very compelling aversive qualities for most people, which means it has a very powerful instinctive effect on us. Not the same as a house, but it can be felt to be very threatening – even without analysing the threat as it actually is.
The most worrying thing here on MoA about people’s atitude to discussions of Covid-19 and the measures taken is that so many people – including commentators who normally give good comments – seem to have a strong aversive reaction to any class of comment that questions the wisdom of the solution these people have accepted for themselves, i.e. the narrative sold to them by the elites. So much so that they immediately panic and fail to cognise the arguments of the comment in question – their reaction comes FIRST, blocking any analysis of the argument. Fear is the most powerful controller of human behaviour, and is totally antagonistic to rational analysis.
The danger flags of what is going on are so strong – and like an aircraft about to crash so many more alarm bells are setting off at every moment – you people are in such a panic and so controlled by fear that they cannot analyse the signals rationally – they cling so tightly to their view of what they think has to be done, that they think only that is right and everything else is wrong.
Please see also my comment here (comment 224), unfortunately at the very end of a dead thread and I suspect seen by very few. That comment is also relevant to the question of why people in the alt-media are embracing a police state.

Posted by: BM | Apr 12 2020 16:28 utc | 106

I see a dotard sniper took a potshot at me–when facts don’t work throw mud is its credo.
Bitumin mining and fracked hydrocarbons both take more energy to extract than they provide. And given their externalities–primarily their environmental cost–they’re incapable of making a profit regardless the price. In other words, they only exist due to politics–the ideology the sniper accused me of spouting. The basis for that ideology goes back to the 1920s, close to 100 years now, history of which the dotard’s clearly ignorant.

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 12 2020 16:49 utc | 107

Shale is probably just the tip of the mountain of industries which could be slam-dunked by the Coronavirus epidemic.
I’ve been marveling at how many of the oh-so-superior White Christian Colonial countries (aka US-NATO’s “International Community” of satanic warmongers) have been caught with their pants down – despite being warned by China & the WHO of its potential severity, in January 2020.
Wikipedia has a lengthy article about Colonialism. It’s basically a very long list of short and long lists pertaining to every facet of Colonialism since the 15th Century, complete with explanatory notes for each item in each list.
The list I was hoping to find is right near the top of the article…
List of (European) colonies:
5.1 British colonies and protectorates
5.2 French colonies
5.3 Russian colonies and protectorates
5.4 German colonies
5.5 Italian colonies and protectorates
5.6 Dutch colonies
5.7 Portuguese colonies
5.8 Spanish colonies
5.9 Austro-Hungarian colonies
5.10 Danish colonies
5.11 Belgian colonies
5.12 Swedish colonies
5.13 Polish-Lituanian colonies and protectorates
5.14 Romanian colonies and occupied territories
5.15 Norwegian Overseas Territories

(Note the absence of the United Shitholes of AmeriKKKa from the list despite its European roots.)
Anyhow, although some entities in the list are less addicted to greed, false accusations, mass-murder and warmongering than others, it provides a handy reference to winkle out the ones whose enthusiasm and readiness for war seems to surpass concern for the well-being of their own citizens by several orders of magnitude. Their inability to protect frontline medical personnel being just the most obvious indicator of their screwed up priorities.
Scrutiny of this Axis Of Evil list to identify the worst offenders tends to support the assumption that Christian Colonial countries are just as contemptuous and neglectful toward their own citizens as they are toward the citizens of OTHER countries they’ve ruined and looted, or hope to.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 12 2020 17:25 utc | 108

Re: Mina | Apr 12 2020 14:07 utc | 98
Thanks for the link! I needed a good laugh today.

Posted by: AntiSpin | Apr 12 2020 19:27 utc | 109

@BM #106
Not really clear what you are trying to say.
The “alt media” you refer to seems primarily to refer to alt-left. The (alt or just plain) right are increasingly looking to lockdowns as communist/big government infringement on their social and economic liberty.
The sad reality is that liberals frequently want government to accomplish what they cannot accomplish themselves. Climate change is another area where there have been many talks about government forcing people to do “what’s right”.
To be clear: nCOV/COVID-19/novel coronavirus is very much a serious societal, health and economic problem.
The problem is that there simply isn’t a simple, easy solution palatable to either right or left.
The left wants to lock down because that’s what “the experts” say – yet the reality is that the progress of nCOV seems mostly disassociated with lockdowns. The limousine liberals like this because it protects them even as it exposes the poor.
The right calls nCOV a hoax or exaggerated or a grab for power or some combination. nCOV isn’t a hoax, there absolutely is some power (and money) grabbing but it clearly is a consequence, not a cause – and it definitely isn’t exaggerated as is becoming ever more clear over time. But the preferred “do nothing” is a terrible approach as well.
The strategy that seems the most effective is odious to both left and right – and may be too late: contact tracing and forced/enforced quarantine for everyone potentially exposed. This includes app/cell phone/wrist band based monitoring, bans on large public gatherings, major changes to how health care is administered in the US.
But no one is talking about this.

Posted by: c1ue | Apr 12 2020 20:35 utc | 110

@dickrd | Apr 12 2020 7:38 utc | 78
Can’t wait for the demise of the corrupt reneables hoax
Renewables are not a hoax. In the long run, they will help a lot. After all, few sensible people believe that there’s enough oil to allow the world to consume 100 million barrels/day of oil forever. In the short run, in order to get started, renewables need subsidies in order to avoid being buried by the heavily subsidized competition — what do you think the $trillions spent on the military are if not largely subsidies for the oil industry?
@Norwegian | Apr 12 2020 12:23 utc | 89
The American military is especially important to Norwegians, who can pump their depleting oil wells in peace without worrying about pirates.

Posted by: Cyril | Apr 13 2020 0:13 utc | 111

What are you talking about Cyril? Last I heard the American Military had become pirates.

Posted by: arby | Apr 13 2020 11:43 utc | 112

Cyril @ 111
What a strange comment.
Don’t you think that the Norwegian airforce and navy are perfectly capable of protecting their own waters? The USAF and USN are rarely in Norway anyway. The only US force in Norway are Marines with tanks etc and I don’t think defending Norway’s oil rigs is part of their remit.

Posted by: JohninMK | Apr 13 2020 12:00 utc | 113

As far as I can tell the US Military isn’t anywhere to protect anything or anybody else besides “American Interests”.
This is the hokey pokey they sell the American people. That they need this huge military to protect all of these countries from evildoers. It is a crock.

Posted by: arby | Apr 13 2020 12:31 utc | 114

@JohninMK | Apr 13 2020 12:00 utc | 113
Don’t you think that the Norwegian airforce and navy are perfectly capable of protecting their own waters? The USAF and USN are rarely in Norway anyway. The only US force in Norway are Marines with tanks etc and I don’t think defending Norway’s oil rigs is part of their remit.
Norway’s navy/airforce may or may not be able to protect the country’s oil wells, I don’t know. I do know that the mere threat of American retaliation is enough to frighten the pirates and deter them. The American navy doesn’t have to be nearby.
The Norwegians definitely pay for this protection, if only by supporting the petrodollar.
The protection cost, plus whatever Norway spends on its own navy, is in the $billions — and is basically a giant subsidy for Norwegian oil.
Against such lavish subsidies, it is easy to see that the young renewables industry needs help. And it receives comparatively little — a few $millions here and there. And yet some people whine about even such a trivial outlay, completely ignoring the strong likelihood that the small seeds we plant today will grow and yield rich harvests soon.

Posted by: Cyril | Apr 14 2020 12:46 utc | 115

Predicted:
It means that the price of oil will move below $20/bl until demand comes back from its current 75 Mbpd to above 90 Mbpd.
Now:

Oil prices extended their slump Wednesday, with WTI hitting the lowest level since 2002 as planned output cuts were deemed insufficient to offset a coronavirus-fuelled slump in demand.
The benchmark WTI contract tumbled to $19.20 per barrel, the lowest level in 18 years.
Shortly after, around 0920 GMT, WTI was down 2.3 percent at $19.66 per barrel and Brent showed a 3.6-percent loss at $28.54.

Posted by: b | Apr 15 2020 15:08 utc | 116

Posted by: b | Apr 15 2020 15:08 utc | 116
And that could be years, for that demand to come back, it could be never.
Meanwhile OPEC+ gets to say they are trying to help, and Trump will jump on it to claim he is doing something.
Fiddling while Rome burns …
Patrick Armstrong has a new one up at Strategic Culture on the face-mask problem:
here

Posted by: Bemildred | Apr 15 2020 16:34 utc | 117