Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
February 28, 2020
Syria – Deadly Bomb Strike Warns Turkey To End Its Escapades

The last three days of the Idleb campaign were quite eventful.

The Turkey supported Jihadis threw everything they had against Saraqib where the M4 and M5 highways join. This enabled the Syrian army to take some 40 towns and cities at the southern front. The whole Ghab plain has now been liberated and the frontline has been massively shortened.

Idleb governorate Feb 25 2020

bigger

Idleb governorate Feb 28 2020

bigger

Saraqib fell to the Jihadis but they paid a very bloody price for it as the Syrian and Russian airforce continued to intensively bomb the approaches to the city. A new defensive line has now been established around Saraqib and the Syrian army is preparing to recover it.

To take the large area in the south in difficult terrain and against little resistance was more important than the temporary loss of Saraqib.

Yesterday saw a extraordinary escalation as the Russian airforce bombed a Turkish infantry battalion which went south of the M4 highway and came near to the southern frontline. Metin Gurcan deciphered the event:

What exactly transpired on Feb. 27? At around 5 p.m., a Turkish mechanized infantry battalion, comprised of about 400 soldiers, became the target of an airstrike on a road between al- Bara and Balyun, some 5 kilometers (3 miles) north of Kafr Nabl in southern Idlib. According to local sources contacted by Al-Monitor, two Russian Sukhoi Su-34 and two Syrian Su-22 fighter jets had launched intensive bombings of Turkey-backed Syrian National Army (SNA) targets in southern Idlib at around 11 a.m. that day. The same jets hit the Turkish convoy in coordinated action, the sources said. A first, a relatively lighter strike by the Su-22s forced the convoy to stop, after which the pounding intensified, forcing the soldiers to take shelter in several roadside buildings. What followed next was likely the dropping of KAB-1500L bombs — a variation of advanced laser-guided bunker buster bombs capable of penetrating to depths of up to 20 meters (65 feet) — by the Russian jets. Two of the buildings collapsed in the attack, leaving the Turkish soldiers under the rubble.

At least 35 Turkish soldiers, some say 55, were killed and some 60+ were wounded.

The incident was a signal to Turkey that its escapades have to end.

Throughout the last weeks Turkey had used large armed drones to attack the Syrian army. The Turkish troops in Idelb governorate had additionally used man portable air defense missiles (MANPADs) against Syrian helicopters and Russian bombers. Enough was enough.

Turkey does not have permission to use drones within the Syrian airspace. On Wednesday Syria's air defense destroyed one of them.

To use manpads against Russian planes is an act of war. The Russian strike was a reminder to the Turks that it is quite able to wage one.

Russia denied that its planes had launched the attack and Turkey accused Syria of doing it. But these statements are designed to deescalate and to allow for continued peaceful relations between Russia and Turkey. Both sides know very well what really had happened.

There is still Erdogan's threat to launch a full sized attack on the Syrian army on March 1. He threatened to push it back to the old Sochi memorandum ceasefire lines. Russia has moved two frigates into the Mediterranean Sea which are armed with cruise missiles.These will be used if Turkey really attempts to implement its idiotic plan.

NATO and the U.S. have both rejected getting involved in the Idleb affair. Turkey is on its own and Erdogan will have to be careful. He is not only losing in Syria but also in Libya and he can not risk to further upsetting Russia because the Turkish economy depends on it.

Comments

@ 293 mina… i don’t know that it matters.. europe is like an appendage of the usa.. they are extremely slow to stopped in recognizing any independence from usa foreign policy..

Posted by: james | Mar 1 2020 16:59 utc | 301

@redrooster #302:

Too far away from the frontlines, low accuracy.

There are several guided projectiles available in 155 mm:

  • M712 Copperhead/Copperhead-2 laser-guided projectile with a range of 16/20 km, 83% probability of a direct hit (assuming suitable weather conditions and no laser countermeasures) and a unit cost of $70,000.
  • M1156 Precision Guidance Kit GPS guidance add-on that can be screwed on top of a M549A1 projectile for a range of 30 km, an accuracy of 30 m CEP (half of projectiles land within 30 m of the target) and a unit cost of $10,000 (including the cost of the projectile).
  • M982 Excalibur GPS-guided projectile with a range of 40–57 km, an accuracy of 5–20 m CEP and a unit cost of $70,000.

The U.S. could have unofficially supplied these to Turkey to be used with Fırtına or Panter howitzers. They’re not that expensive compared to the cost of armor and drones that Turkey is losing in Idlib.

Posted by: S | Mar 1 2020 19:39 utc | 302

Peter AU1 #288
Russia won’t attack Turkish batteries in Turkey because of NATO article 4. The Turks aren’t attacking Russia. But Syria could fire back as counter battery fire in response to being attacked by Turkey. This won’t invoke the Article “technically”, but then that technicality might just be argued about later. I think Erdogon will do anything he can to get NATO involved. I suspect they and Israel are already giving them targeting info.

Posted by: Dean | Mar 1 2020 20:29 utc | 303

Better read up on art 5, it’s not what they say…it’s entirely up to each member so far as what they decide to do…Dean Acheson’s auto bio says the same thing – and it was one of his “great achievements”. It “triggers” the members to consider what, if anything, they might do.
Since attacking a country that did not attack you is illegal, they must decide to take the matter to the UNSC – that’s the sole agency lawfully capable of violence, or decide to do nothing.
Art 5 is hokum to create consent for attacking a country that did not attack you – nothing less than that.
It’s also probably void, moot, in Law, because it contravenes the UN Charter and Nuremberg, not that it matters…
“art 5” is just a propaganda slogan.
Propaganda slogans work pretty well…I am sure you’re right that Erdo want help and others also want war and more war… I expect they’ll get what they want.

Posted by: Walter | Mar 1 2020 20:40 utc | 304