Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 15, 2020
The Russian Prime Minister Resigns And No One Knows Why

A curious 'regime change' happened in Russia today as the Prime Minister Dimitry Medvedev and his whole cabinet resigned.

This morning President Vladimir Putin held his yearly speech to the Federal Assembly of Russia (English transcript). Putin spoke about Russia's demographic situation, its weaponry and the celebration of the upcoming 75th anniversary of its second world war victory.

But the most important part was about constitutional changes. A summary via TASS:

Putin has suggested a putting up a package of constitutional amendments for a plebiscite. At the same time, the Russian president stated that he sees no grounds to adopt new constitution in Russia.

Putin also suggest stipulating the supremacy of the Russian Constitution over international norms in Russia.

“The time has come to make some changes to the nation’s fundamental law that would directly guarantee the priority of the Russian Constitution in our legal space. What does this mean? It means that requirements of international law and decisions of international bodies can only be enforced in Russia to such an extent that does not violate human and civil rights and freedoms and does not violate our Constitution,” Putin emphasized.

It seems that the European Court of Human Rights has pissed off Russia once too often. The court is associated with the Council of Europe which has 47 member states including Russia. It has several times judged in the favor of renegade oligarchs in exile and the 'western' supported wannabe opposition in Russia.

Putin then proposed additional changes to the constitution. These were probably the points that led to Medvedev resignation:

Putin agrees that the same person should not hold the post of the head of state for more than two consecutive terms.

"I know that our society is debating the constitutional provision that the same person should not hold the office of President of the Russian Federation for more than two consecutive terms. I do not believe that this question is of fundamental importance, but I agree with this," Putin said.

The TASS interpretation that Putin 'agrees that the same person should not hold the post of the head of state for more than two consecutive terms' is not supported by Putin's statement. Currently the Russian constitution does include a two consecutive terms limit. Does Putin want to keep it or lift it? The official English transcript of the speech also has a slightly different wording:

I know that people are discussing the constitutional provision under which one person cannot hold the post of the President of the Russian Federation for two successive terms. I do not regard this as a matter of principle, but I nevertheless support and share this view.

What exactly is the view Putin is supporting here. A term limit, as TASS seems to imply, or none, as the New York Times rumors? If the term limit is lifted then Putin could run again for a third consecutive presidency. Medvedev, who was said to have hoped to again become president, would probably dislike the second interpretation.

More from TASS:

The president has also suggested complementing Russia’s Constitution with a special requirement that a candidate running for the post of head state should be a resident of Russia for no less than 25 years and have neither foreign citizenship nor an overseas residence permit, not just at the moment of the election, but never before in the past.

Under the Constitution today, any Russian citizen who has lived in the country for no less than ten years can be elected as Russia’s president.

That a presidential candidate should never have had a resident permit in a foreign country is a curious restriction. Putin lived in east-Germany between 1985 and 1990. He was an officer of the KGB at that time but I am sure that the KBG took care to have resident permits from the host country for its undercover officers. However, the change would not effect Medvedev.

Additionally to the above Putin proposed to amend the constitution to expand the powers of parliament and the federal state council, which currently has little to say. From his speech:

What is the situation like now? In accordance with articles 111 and 112 of the Russian Constitution, the President only receives the consent of the State Duma to appoint the Prime Minister, and then appoints the head of the Cabinet, his deputies and all the ministers. I suggest changing the procedure and allowing the State Duma to appoint the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation, and then all deputy prime ministers and federal ministers at the Prime Minister’s recommendation. At the same time the President will have to appoint them, so he will have no right to turn down the candidates approved by the Parliament. (Applause.)

All of this means drastic changes to the political system.

The move would give any future President less power than Putin currently holds. But why would Putin weaken the position of the president if he would want to run for another term?

The resignation of Medvedev as prime minister was completely unexpected and seems politically unnecessary. Media connected it to the constitutional changes Putin proposed:

Before announcing the resignation of the cabinet, Medvedev met with Putin to discuss his state-of-the-nation address, which took place earlier on Wednesday, the Kremlin’s press office said.

In his address, Putin proposed several amendments to the constitution.

Medvedev explained that this cabinet is resigning in accordance with the Article 117 of the Russian Constitution, which says that the government can offer its resignation to the president, who, in turn, can either accept or reject it.

“In this context, it is obvious that, as the government, we must provide the president with a capability to make all decisions,” which are required to implement the proposed plan, Medvedev said.

Putin accepted the resignation and announced that a new position for a Deputy Chairman of the Security Council would be created and that Medvedev would take up that position. The Russian national security council is chaired by the president himself and includes the prime minister, the heads of the federal council and state duma, the ministers of defense, foreign and internal affairs, as well as the heads of the security services.

Medvedev is thereby not sidelined but gains a position in which he is Putin's deputy in important internal and external affairs.

In the evening Putin announced that he appointed Mikhail Mishustin, the head of Russia's Federal Tax Service, as the new Prime Minister. The 53 year old native of Moscow is practically unknown to the wider public. He is a curious and surprising choice.

Even Russian analysts near to Putin seem not to know if Putin and Medvedev had planned today's 'regime change' or if it was a totally spontaneous move by a pissed off Medvedev. They also seem unsure if Putin wants to leave in 2024 or if he wants to stay for another term.

We are thus left to make our own bets.

 

 

Comments

Bernhard, your word-wrap is up the creek. This article appears with long text lines and a horizontal scroll bar at the bottom of my screen.

Posted by: Ernesto Che | Jan 16 2020 13:23 utc | 101

There’s reason to expect soon, for those reading the bones, somewhat of a “reversal” of the betrayal of belavezha. Yes, I did say U as well as R and B. A lot more is happening and more quickly than it may appear, on the VOZ-VVP front. For those supposing that NAN of K is being observed closely as a test case, Correct! Both VVP and AGL are expected by the cognoscenti to become Elders, so to speak. Exciting times!

Posted by: Petra | Jan 16 2020 13:38 utc | 102

@thomas #88
This comment thread is about the announced Russian reforms. If you want to criticize b’s character over his position on PS752 and MH17 incidents, you can do so in the last open thread: The MoA Week In Review – Open Thread 2020-03.
@imo #62
@Maximus #64
@Nemesiscalling #78
@Another unreadable #81
@Igor Bundy #82
@Realist #85
@Ernesto Che #101
Ludwig is not the first and certainly not the last commenter to make a mistake when posting long links. I assume you use Safari, as the page stretching problem does not occur (or is not as severe when it occurs) in the latest version of Firefox. So here’s a tip on how to fix the problem in Safari:
Open TextEdit app. Create a new file. Copy and paste the following line into the editor:

div.comments-body, div.comment-content { word-break: break-word; }

Save the file in the Documents folder under the name “custom.css”. Open Safari app. Click Safari in the menu bar, then Preferences…. A window will open. Select Advanced tab. Click the Style sheet pop-up, select Other…, then navigate to your “custom.css” file and select it.

Posted by: S | Jan 16 2020 13:42 utc | 103

@Petra #102: There are absolutely no indications that Ukraine is moving towards the EAEU, let alone the Union State.

Posted by: S | Jan 16 2020 13:50 utc | 104

S @13.50GMT, It’s rather hush-hush at the mo, so we cannot say too much 🙂 But it is connected directly with neither the US (purely BR) nor the EAEU. The big surprise with be U. Fingers crossed. Watch this space!

Posted by: Petra | Jan 16 2020 14:02 utc | 105

I’ve only seen a few comments here, re: on the timing question, refer to the Soleimani murder as the possible catalyst for the Putin/Medvedev move. Is this a view shared by good owner of this site? What do other commenters think about this conjecture?
I don’t know enough about the Russian Constitution, but does such an announcement have to be made at a ‘State of the Union-type’ speech? Or could it have been done anytime? Why would a crafty Putin respond in the same manner as Soleimani’s abrupt murder – a murder so unbelievably stupid, to say nothing of the moral and legal principles? Was there some massive, Western/Massed breech in the past week that gave VVP pause?
Maybe all you smart folks have some insight into the timing of this governmental shift?
Thanks in advance.

Posted by: W Baker | Jan 16 2020 14:13 utc | 106

Libya, where President Medvedev, notoriously, failed to veto the Us resolution at the UNSC, could be one of the factors in this shake-up. It looks as if Russia is making a commitment there..
(of course this could have been noted earlier in thread one, which I, using chrome, can only read with great difficulty.)

Posted by: bevin | Jan 16 2020 14:27 utc | 107

W Baker @ 106 says:
I’ve only seen a few comments here, re: on the timing question, refer to the Soleimani murder as the possible catalyst for the Putin/Medvedev move
well, I’m pretty sure that that outrageous murder didn’t go unnoticed by Putin, but Obama’s disposition matrix has been in effect for something like ten years now. the juridical justification for this assassination program is essentially an interpretation of an interpretation of some law on the books, pure mumbo jumbo, but in meat space it’s unadulterated tyranny.

Posted by: john | Jan 16 2020 14:37 utc | 108

No problems with formating using my old, pre-chromiun Firefox, and I have checked chromium Firefox, xlean there too. For those using G*** Chrome, here’s a tip that provides a solution to make your page readable:
*** Grab an add-on called JustRead and the text will be wrapped properly (JR is handy for getting rid of extraneous junk on any page).

Posted by: Petra | Jan 16 2020 14:39 utc | 109

Finally a page change..

Posted by: Lozion | Jan 16 2020 14:49 utc | 110

Not sure what this means for Russia yet, but can anyone name a Democratic / parliamentary system that hasn’t fallen under the influence, or total control, of ZioAmerica and the Zionists ? There is a reason why ” Democracy ” is pushed so strongly by the P.T.B.

Posted by: Fog of War | Jan 16 2020 14:49 utc | 111

Russian Constitution, Article 81, Paragraph 3 says:

3. Одно и то же лицо не может занимать должность Президента Российской Федерации более двух сроков подряд.

This Russian sentence is ambiguous—there are two ways to interpret it.
One way is that “one can’t be a President for more than two consecutive terms”, meaning that two consecutive terms is the absolute limit and one can’t go over that. So, for example, you can’t serve for two consecutive terms, then rest, then serve for another term, because that would be “more” than two consecutive terms.
Another way to interpret the sentence is that “one can’t be a President for more than two terms consecutively”—but it’s possible to serve for more than two terms non-consecutively.
Ideally, a request for clarification should have been sent to the Supreme Court, which should have decided on the correct interpretation of the ambiguous sentence. But now it won’t be needed, as Putin and the establishment have decided to remove the word “подряд” (consecutively) altogether. This removal is what Putin was “agreeing” with when he said: “I do not believe that this question is of fundamental importance, but I agree with this”.
I also support removing it, because stupid ambiguous sentences like this should not be part of the Constitution. On the other hand, I’m not so sure about the two-term limit itself. Maybe we shouldn’t have term limits at all.

Posted by: S | Jan 16 2020 14:50 utc | 112

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Wednesday (15 January) Moscow has been urging Gulf countries to consider a common security mechanism for the region and it was time the world got rid of unilateral measures such as sanctions.
“We have been suggesting to the Gulf countries to think about collective security mechanisms … starting with confidence building measures and inviting each other to military exercises,” Lavrov told a security conference in Delhi.
Tensions in the Gulf have risen following the US killing of Iranian military commander General Qassem Soleimani and a retaliatory missile attack by Iran on US forces in Iraq.
“Since I mentioned about Persian Gulf, we are very much concerned about what is going in there,” Lavrov said.

Sergey Lavrov, @mfa_russia: ‘The old deficiencies of the Security Council need to be addressed. India and Brazil need their due representation in global affairs. We need to support multi-polar order for this to happen’ #RaisinaDialogue2020 pic.twitter.com/LxNez6hNJG
— Carl Jaison (@CarlJaison) January 15, 2020

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif is also attending the conference in Delhi that comes just a day after Britain, France and Germany formally accused Iran of violating the terms of its 2015 agreement to curb its nuclear program, which eventually could lead to the reimposing of UN sanctions.
https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/russia-urges-persian-gulf-nations-to-consider-a-joint-security-mechanism/

Posted by: Mao | Jan 16 2020 14:57 utc | 113

I want to make the observations that 1.) there do not appear to have been any leaks prior to Putin’s announcements, not even after his annual “report”, everybody appears gobsmacked, and 2.) the Russian government seems to be unanimous in support of the changes, everybody seems to be on board.

Posted by: Bemildred | Jan 16 2020 14:59 utc | 114

@Mao #113: Dear Chairman, please don’t post off-topic comments. You can post comments on Iran/JCPoA to Trump’s EU Poodles – Germany, Britain And France – Obey His Order To Kill The Nuclear Deal With Iran.

Posted by: S | Jan 16 2020 15:12 utc | 115

John @ 108 says: “well, I’m pretty sure that that outrageous murder didn’t go unnoticed by Putin, but Obama’s disposition matrix has been in effect for something like ten years now. the juridical justification for this assassination program is essentially an interpretation of an interpretation of some law on the books, pure mumbo jumbo, but in meat space it’s unadulterated tyranny.”
Understood about the outrageous killing of Soleimani and the transparently tyrannical underpinning. What about the Obama ‘disposition matrix’ or the Trump version, would make Putin respond now?
RT and Vesti are obviously reporting this as, ‘there’s nothing to see here, move along’. Putin is no idiot: he understands timing as well as any crook on the international political stage. (Not singling out Putin as a “crook” from any sort of neo-liberal/neo-con perspective. All the bastards are power hungry criminals.)

Posted by: W Baker | Jan 16 2020 15:23 utc | 116

@ thomas | Jan 16 2020 8:37 utc | 88
I understand you consider yourself a true pacifist, and mourn the deaths of hundreds after the shoot down of two civilian planes. Unlike b. Right?
So, how about the simple fact that the Western powers kill 329 human beings in the Middle East. Every day. For the past 27 years? (German language)
That’s what outrages almost everyone here. Including b I guess. I think you should work on your perspective.

Posted by: Cemi | Jan 16 2020 15:38 utc | 117

The catalyist for these changes now is the assassination of Soleimani. Soleimani was lured to Bagdhad by the US via the Iraqi PM’s office for the promised purpose of pursuing a rapproachment between Iran and KSA.
His movements were monitored by the Mossad via operatives at the Damascus and Bagdhad airports.
The drone was launched and in position to kill him and his reception committee. No consideration was given to the sovereignty of Iraq, the lives of the Iraqi reception committee, or the lives of innocent bystanders.
Pompeo blatantly stated that killing Soleimani was his goal for the last 18 months for the purpose of destroying the resistance, regardless of the fact that Soleimani was instrumental in the defeat of ISIS, and worked with the US in that regard.
This puts on notice the leaders of all nations refusing to toe the US line that the US will not hesitate to kill them when opportunity presents itself. This includes both Putin and Xi.
There is actually only one deterrent to this.
A proxy must be found with no scruples, who will take on the job of killing Pompeo and Trump…
A proxy who sets themselves up as a worldwide vigilante…. judge, jury, and executioner….
And….
Openly says so………
Currently there is none such….
But….
Everyone is on notice….. no one is safe…..
INDY

Posted by: Dr. George W Oprisko | Jan 16 2020 15:55 utc | 118

Reading Patrick’s Armstrong’s take on it and what B says here, I wonder if Medvedev resigned because he was pissed off, or rather is moving to another less exposed post, yet one just as important right now, at the Security Council as a way of being nicely positioned when it’ll come to jockeying for Putin’s succession.
As for Putin, looks like he realized that there’s a risk of having a weaker, or incompetent, or corrupt, or malevolent president, sooner or later – probably not the next time, but in a decade -, and therefore it’s best to downplay and weaken a bit the presidential powers, to avoid a future catastrophe.

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Jan 16 2020 15:57 utc | 119

As a US peon, I know that I am supposed to fear and hate Russia and especially “Vlad the Bad”. Trouble is, I can never remember exactly why. I listened to self-important news readers on TV explain to me that Putin is consolidating power. Why is that any of my business? They never explain.
Then they quietly mumbled something about how Putin was redistributing power. The obvious contradiction with what they said 30 seconds earlier was ignored. Completely. But no matter, because now it’s time to hate on Iran for two minutes, to be followed by China. Uncle Sam has so many enemies du jour that I can no longer keep up with them all. It’s now almost Noon. Who am I supposed to hate at Noon?
I’ve read that in Soviet times people who were paying attention would watch the official TV news just for a daily laugh at the obvious state propaganda. My impression was that most people knew it was all baloney. I wonder if that was correct. I also wonder if my fellow peons will ever catch on…

Posted by: Trailer Trash | Jan 16 2020 16:23 utc | 120

S @ 112
Good post on the ambiguity of the “two consecutive terms” clause. As to pros and cons of term limits I can see arguments for both sides.
Many Americans who have not traveled in Russia can be somewhat naive as to differences in cultural and philosophical norms between citizens of the two countries. In many cases these norms came about over time for reasons relevant to past profound experiences or conditions (eg for the US last 150 years War was always “over there”: not so in Russia). Of course anyone travelling to any country should be aware of this (in Georgia USA where I live most folks smile or nod when encountering a stranger; in Russia folks would assume you were somewhat nutty for doing this. Or notice riding the Moscow Metro and the cultural norm of staying quiet and respectful of those around you, compared with NYC subway where passengers can talk loudly and call attention to themselves). This is not to imply one is better than the other, but just different.
This applies to how many Russians I have met feel about the term limits issue. In the US most everyone accepts it as the universal standard, and that any country that doesn’t adopt the same must have autocratic tendencies or accept being ruled by “dictators” (how many times have you heard that term applied to Putin by US politicians and MSM? In Russia the vast majority would laugh at your naivete if you used that term). By contrast, many Russians hold the view that if a leader has done a good job for the country over an extended time, why would you not want to keep him in office?

Posted by: Kabobyak | Jan 16 2020 16:24 utc | 121

>By contrast, many Russians hold the view that if a
>leader has done a good job for the country over an
>extended time, why would you not want to keep him in office?
>Posted by: Kabobyak | Jan 16 2020 16:24 utc | 121
It’s almost as if Russians expect their leaders to be competent and honorable. As a US peon, this is a foreign concept. US peons expect their leaders to be incompetent and corrupt fools. We are seldom disappointed…

Posted by: Trailer Trash | Jan 16 2020 16:38 utc | 122

Re pogohere | Jan 16 2020 8:25 utc | 87
You rightly point out that I was quoting Russian Federation Federal Law, rather than the Constitution (apologies for my misattribution). And you quote the Constitution as it states “The protection and ensuring the stability of the rouble shall be the major task of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it shall fulfil independently of the other bodies of state authority.”
Yet my point remains: the Russian Federal Law reveals the fact that the Russian Central Bank works at the behest of the IMF and Western Central Banks. It is precisely in the failure of the Russian Central Bank to protect the ruble and to create interest rates that promote economic growth in Russia that illustrates the Russian Central Bank is captured by Western interests. Read the interview with Sergei Glaziev for an explanation.
Yes, the Russian Central Bank has been independent of the Russian Federal Government, much to the disadvantage of the Russian Federation. Hopefully, the changes Putin has instigated will correct this situation.

Posted by: Perimetr | Jan 16 2020 16:51 utc | 123

I’d like to reemphasize what I wrote earlier about the lack of anything coming from the Kremlin prior to then after Soleimani’s murder. IMO, something deeply important was being discussed, which I thought connected in some fashion to the upcoming speech on the 15th, an opinion I expressed at the time. Not even the usual public condolences acknowledged/issued by Kremlin were made to Iran over it which I saw as extremely unusual. So, it must be concluded that all these changes and suggestions were being drawn up and discussed prior to Soleimani’s murder.
Do recall Russia’s current constitution isn’t of its own making; rather, it was imposed on Russia by the CIA and further altered in the favor of the Executive during Yeltsin’s war on the Duma in 1993, also instigated by the CIA. Putin’s saying a completely new, Russian composed, constitution’s not required, but modifications to the imposed constitution’s are greatly needed to improve the efficiency of the government and increase the level of citizen participation in their governance–all with the aim at improving Russia and Russians, which has been Putin’s priority for years provided you’ve read his speeches discussions, pressers, and followed his visits throughout Russia, where he’s made a great effort to try and visit every region and the backwaters within them. The best of Russia’s Tsars treated the nation and its people like a favorite child–very paternalistically. Over his tenure, Putin’s developed a similar relationship which is why he doesn’t need a wife–he’s married to Russia and all Russians are his kin, even the wayward ones.
The limiting of the first presidential term makes great sense in case of poor performance, which I would place at 3 years. The second term, however, ought to be longer since we assume good performance was rewarded by reelection, which I would make 8 years, with a provision for recall, or approval of extension, after 3 years based on performance. Those are my thoughts on the topic.
IMO, Putin would likely be an effective governor until his mental faculties begin to wane, which with his powerful mind might not occur for another 6 years or more. His devotion and paternalism both likely motivate him to keep a hand on guiding Russia, much like Nazarbayev. The times are also quite dangerous, so that’s another motivating factor. We ought to soon see feedback in the Russian media that will allow us outsiders to gain a better understanding.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 16 2020 16:52 utc | 124

Perhaps I am naive, but it seem to me that the schedule for re-organizing the Russian State has been moved up due to the direct threats by Imperial voice to murder Putin, or anybody else. The reason being the formation of a protean structure and a war cabinet. This is necessary because it is understood that it is now war – but perhaps a sitzkrieg of sorts, but the direction of things is obviously into the dark unknown.

Posted by: Walter | Jan 16 2020 17:02 utc | 125

@imo #62
@Maximus #64
@Nemesiscalling #78
@Another unreadable #81
@Igor Bundy #82
@Realist #85
@Ernesto Che #101
@bevin #107
@Lozion #110
I’ve just noticed that Chrome also has the page stretching issue. Here’s how to fix it:
Install the Stylus extension for Chrome. Open http://www.moonofalabama.org (the main page) in a new window. Click the Stylus button in the toolbar (turquoise “S”). A small pop-up panel will appear. Click the “www.moonofalabama.org” link directly under the “Write style for:” label. A new tab will open with a code editor. Copy and paste the following line of code into the editor:

div.comments-body, div.comment-content { word-break: break-word; }

Click Save button on the left. Close the tab.
All MoA pages that appeared stretched will now display normally.
(Note that the code editor will show a small yellow warning icon. This is because the “break-word” value of the “word-break” parameter is deprecated. However, it works and will continue to work for a long time, so you can ignore it.)

Posted by: S | Jan 16 2020 17:29 utc | 126

W Baker @ 116 says:
What about the Obama ‘disposition matrix’ or the Trump version, would make Putin respond now
nothing. Putin’s announcing, not responding. the timing seems immaterial to me.

Posted by: john | Jan 16 2020 17:52 utc | 127

To easily read a messed up thread like this one,
post the link of the article + comments thread into
https://outline.com
It’s amazing –
it suddenly ALL makes sense (of a kind)
and looks SO pro! 🙂

Posted by: Noirette | Jan 16 2020 18:06 utc | 128

I think that Putin is the clever one here. As I’ve always understood it, the “hyper presidency” that Russia currently has and that is used by “The West” to bash Putin as a dictator, was put in place by Yeltsin with the approval of the US. Not that the US has any business approving or disapproving the structure of the Russian government BUT it seems as if Washington’s modus opperandi is to have governments that are either dictatorships or where power is concentrated in one politician’s hands. If you only have to manipulate/subvert/assassinate one person to gain control of a country, you’ve made your task of controlling other countries much easier. By spreading authority out, it makes the job of the US that much more difficult as the US has been very clear that our objective is to break up the Russian Federation.

Posted by: Jeff | Jan 16 2020 18:09 utc | 129

@Perimetr #123

It is precisely in the failure of the Russian Central Bank to protect the ruble and to create interest rates that promote economic growth in Russia…

The inflation is at historic lows: Russia Inflation Rate (click 5Y/10Y/25Y/MAX buttons to see the dynamic over various periods of time). The interest rate has returned to normal values after it had to be sharply increased to contain inflation in the wake of ruble’s transition to a floating exchange rate regime in late 2014; the Central Bank keeps cutting it: Russia Interest Rate. So I don’t think it’s fair to put all the blame on the Central Bank; rather, one should take a closer look at the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Economic Development.

Posted by: S | Jan 16 2020 18:17 utc | 130

b, arbitrarily this caught my attention:
It seems that the European Court of Human Rights has pissed off Russia once too often. The court is associated with the Council of Europe which has 47 member states including Russia. It has several times judged in the favor of renegade oligarchs in exile and the ‘western’ supported wannabe opposition in Russia.
But then, I realized you focused on something else*. Anyone here has more deep information on ECHR verdicts in regards to the “renegade oligarchs”? I seriously would like to know. …
But yes:
Article 1 – property
Article 1 (“A1P1”) [45] provides that “every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions”. The European Court of Human Rights acknowledged a violation of the fair balance between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual’s fundamental rights, also, in the uncertainty – for the owner – about the future of the property, and in the absence of an allowance.[46]

* occasionally I watched the European Parliament debates and came away from the experience feeling heavily antidemocratic. Were it more arbitrarily, the wrong subjects discussed I choose to watch, was there much power put into influence behind arguments, did they not have much time to really inform themselves. Your guess is as good as mine.

Posted by: moon | Jan 16 2020 18:22 utc | 131

Re S | Jan 16 2020 18:17 utc | 130
OK . . . but the source you cite gets its data from the IMF and World Bank. “The data provided by the website come from sources such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, government central banks and national statistics bureaus and is frequently checked for accuracy.”
I tend to trust the information provided by Sergei Glaziev.

Posted by: Perimetr | Jan 16 2020 18:47 utc | 132

moon @131–
Your premonition is correct. The aim of Neoliberalism and its benefactors is to reduce/negate any claim that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, and to revert to the relations present within Feudalism where social relations were simply Nobles versus serfs–people having no independent right to exist except at the pleasure of their Lord. Such is the exact relation Obama promoted when he protected the fraudulent bankers from prosecution and the property from being nationalized/made public, whereas commonfolk were tossed from their homes into the streets by the millions.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 16 2020 18:52 utc | 133

@126 Hell no, I wont touch a google app or device with a [insert favorite metric] pole..

Posted by: Lozion | Jan 16 2020 19:02 utc | 134

@FogOfWar111
Any system which allows for the accumulation of ‘wealth’ beyond personal needs will inevitably end up perverted by said accumulated wealth.
Want is the Lock
Need is the Key

Posted by: Tannenhouser | Jan 16 2020 19:16 utc | 135

I think this is very much a Russia First policy. Probably a good example of how to go about it. The part where you have to be a born and bred Russian is the key.

Posted by: imoverit | Jan 16 2020 19:29 utc | 136

S 112
Limiting the number of terms for leaders is an American thing. Personally, I can’t see much point in throwing out a leader if the majority would vote for him or her.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 16 2020 19:44 utc | 137

@Perimetr #132:
Attrubution is provided at the end of the text summaries above the charts. Specifically, the inflation rate chart references the Federal State Statistics Service [of Russia] and the interest rate chart references the Central Bank of Russia. If you think the Trading Economics website is lying, you can verify the data at the Federal State Statistics Service and The Central Bank of the Russian Federation English-language websites.
I agree with many points Glazyev is making, but the notion that the Central Bank of Russia is the only institution responsible for Russian economic problems is wrong.

Posted by: S | Jan 16 2020 19:48 utc | 138

“..the relations present within Feudalism where social relations were simply Nobles versus serfs–people having no independent right to exist except at the pleasure of their Lord.’
karlofi@133
I realise that this is not intended to be a precise definition but it just isn’t very helpful. Relations under ‘feudalism’ were in many ways superior to capitalism’s freedoms. Almost all the C19th critics of Capitalism including Ruskin and William Morris realised this. In daily reality the feudal community functioned in a democratic and open way, with land and grazing rights being allotted in an equitable manner by local juries consisting of the inhabitants.
The superiority of pre-capitalist societies in many respects was recognised by Marx in his later years when he came to understand the way that the Russian mir worked and recognised the possibility of avoiding the capitalist ‘stage’ of development.
I think that you are channeling Hudson here and, in doing so, forgetting your understanding of the enormous power that the people have always been able to impose in any society.
Did you see this article at Counterpunch today?
https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/01/16/the-wonders-of-modern-life-briefly-explained-an-anthropology-of-the-industrial-revolution/
Highly recommended, unfortunately the book is a bit pricey.

Posted by: bevin | Jan 16 2020 19:51 utc | 139

Putins announcement on strategic weapons came during the same speech in 2018. It was after Trump released his NPP but was eighteen years in the making.
This change has been a long time in the making and announced during the annual speech. For a long time, Putin has accurately judged where the world, and particularly the US is headed and made preparations accordingly. Also very good at picking the best time to announce things that have been long in the planning or building.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 16 2020 20:00 utc | 140

It’s difficult to say if this item was discussed on the first page of this topic since I was unable to properly read most of it thanks to the format disruption. As this Cabinet Meeting transcript makes clear, Medvedev was performing his PM plus some of Putin’s duties:
“There is a clear-cut presidential block of issues, and there is a Government block of issues, even though the President, of course, is responsible for everything, but the presidential block includes primarily matters of security, defence and the like.
“Mr Medvedev has always been in charge of these matters. From the point of view of increasing our defence capability and security, I consider it possible and have asked him to deal with these matters in the future. I consider it possible and will, in the near future, introduce the position of Deputy Chairman of the Security Council. As you are aware, the President is its Chairman.”
In no way do I see Medvedev as being angry or miffed, and he agrees to continue to perform the presidential duties as he was previously. Indeed, IMO, Putin’s address was jointly planned by him and Medvedev, which it seems is admitted:
“Mr Medvedev and I have discussed in detail the questions that I raised in the Address to the Federal Assembly. As you see, there are many issues, and to successfully complete what we planned in the past and what has been offered to our society today, we must certainly do a lot, in part, to properly organise our work.”
I read the development and Medvedev’s new position as putting even greater emphasis on Russia’s defense, allowing Putin to continue as he was before along with giving him the time to oversee the proposed constitutional changes that are to be approved of by Russia’s polity. Plus, the new PM Mikhail Mishustin, won’t have the defense duties Medvedev had so he can concentrate his energies on increasing the government’s performance–all of which is aimed at accomplishing the National Projects ontime thus enhancing Russia and the lives of Russians.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 16 2020 20:02 utc | 141

Indeed, b, I would suggest that the answer to “no one knows why” is in the careful consideration of Putin’s first State of the Union speech, which is linked to at the Saker site, both video and transcript. What he is suggesting there, with the obedient resignations following upon it, is the complete reorganization of the Russian government but not at the loss of those who have guided it through difficult times since the original Constitution was put in place. Rather as he says in the speech, “…the rotation of those who are in power…”
I agree with karlof1 that this is taking place as designed to do so before the tragedies in Iran, but it is a grand enough speech that it easily absorbs those tragedies into its language. Directly being considered is the preservation of Russia’s Constitution of 1993. That “…threats, dangers, of a magnitude no one could have imagined ever before…” had occurred soon after it was put in place (as they have since) “…and that was a pity, as they should have thought about it in due time…”
This targets the speech upon fortifying the apparatus of government for foreseeable contingencies that may arise, by keeping the experienced workers, rather than on any immediate issue save as it falls into the general unified goal:
“…Firstly, Russia can be and can remain Russia only as a sovereign state. Our nation’s sovereignty must be unconditional. We have done a great deal to achieve this. We restored our state’s unity. We have overcome the situation when certain powers in the government were essentially usurped by oligarch clans. Russia has returned to international politics as a country whose opinion cannot be ignored…”
I had wondered here previously how the US leadership could even be considering its own State of the Union address this month. This speech sets an enviable pattern – would that they could imitate it! I commented at the Saker site that I was thrilled for this speech to have been given on my own saint’s day, that being the day of Saint Juliana of Lazarevo. It’s a bit like my having a grandson born last year on my birthday!
Thank you, President Putin!

Posted by: juliania | Jan 16 2020 20:12 utc | 142

S @138–
“… the notion that the Central Bank of Russia is the only institution responsible for Russian economic problems is wrong.”
Agreed. Fundamental planning is done within the Russian central government in concert with the regional governments. Putin in several recent speeches has made getting greater input and participation from the Regions at all stages of planning and implementation of policy a priority. he has also stated that the Central Bank’s role is to support whatever policy’s determined to be along with its custodial and juridical chores.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 16 2020 20:13 utc | 143

Re S | Jan 16 2020 19:48 utc | 138
i appreciate your replies. I hadn’t meant to imply that the Central Bank was the source of all problems, just a primary one.

Posted by: Perimetr | Jan 16 2020 20:13 utc | 144

karlof1 141
The change may be linked to foreign policy in general, not just defence. This section of what juliana quoted “Russia has returned to international politics as a country whose opinion cannot be ignored”
The changes seem intended so that parliament or PM can concentrate fully on domestic issues and the Presidents office be able to concentrate more fully on the now greatly expanded and very complex foreign affairs of Russia.
Part of Medvedev’s move may be that he will act as Putin’s envoy. They have worked together for a long time in the two top positions in Russia and I would guess Putin has a great deal of Trust in Medvedev.

Posted by: Peter AU1 | Jan 16 2020 20:43 utc | 145

bevin @139–
Your objection’s noted! Yes, there was a greater degree of Communalism during Feudalism primarily because of the paternalistic nature of relations–the notion being that the Feudal Lord was the father and his serfs his progeny to the point where he could exploit them however he pleased. Enclosure and the development of a cash economy destroyed Feudal relations in the UK; but as you note, Feudal relations weren’t the same everywhere. Some today given their condition would welcome the return of a situation where they were nominally cared for instead of forced to fend for themselves with no support whatsoever in laissez-faire dominant societies like the UK and its offspring.
Thanks for pointing to that article. The book by the author seems to be one of several along similar lines. Had a short discussion yesterday about the pitfalls of a cash economy. When examining the human condition, it appears we are always enslaved to something, be it Nature or manmade. Has Humanity ever been at ease with itself, its condition? Or is it Humanity’s Cross that it’s restless and never satisfied?

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 16 2020 20:53 utc | 146

@ karlof1 – thanks for your comments – @ 124 in particular.. i agree.. we are going to have to wait to understand it better..
@ back and forth on the central bank of russia… i like sergei glazievs commentary too.. i would like to hear what he has to say circa 2019 or 2020 as opposed to 2016 though.. as i see it, the cb or russia is par of the central bank dynamic which is a western run project, so my thinking is although it is a wedge for use against other countries by the west, it has been mostly neutralized by russia.. the whole concept of ”developing” verses ”developed” is the basis for the voting rights at the imf.. guess who is considered developed and who is considered developing? that is the same unequal treatment that the west would like to continue to perpetuate..
as for the medvedev and putin relationship – the astrology between them is positive.. i don’t know the history but i suspect medvedev is in full agreement with putin here… and of course i think the hit on soleimeni has some to do with this too.. all countries have to figure out a way to deal with an increasingly exceptional rogue nation here…

Posted by: james | Jan 16 2020 21:21 utc | 147

the Supreme Court and the Court of Arbitration merged, [.]
Posted by: Likklemore | Jan 15 2020 20:11 utc | 24

That’s interesting. How many of us in the West are aware of Courts of Arbitration?

Posted by: moon | Jan 16 2020 22:07 utc | 148

There are other aspects to this than the purely practical and there is one thing parts of this reminds me of, and it’s not a good thing, it is the idea (or maybe truism) that without the right people the system ultimately doesn’t matter.
Or if that is too offensive: there’s always someone who manages to break anything (I’m probably one of those kinds of people myself).
If Putin is closing the door on the possibility of another future Putin then isn’t that a huge mistake? Isn’t it actually a perfect example of where it would make sense to use “Ok Boomer” as a reply?
Because whether one agrees or not one should perhaps be aware that belief in systems is the biggest -ism of all. Politics are essentially always —one way or another— the sum of human deficiency.
That might make me sound like an anarchist or like I’m anti-Putin and neither is true, I’m just worried.
– – – –
Winston2’s comment is insightful.
– – – –
To me Thomas is a caricature of a typically destructive and self-harming western “leftist” of the sort that would fit right into the infinite idiocy of the Spanish civil war (and everyone should be aware of who won that one and why). I notice the comment where 90% is one quote straight after another without much in the way of formatting or any attempt at clarity; a simple failure of the Turing test which looks like a badly programmed Markov chain thus 100% bot.
– – – –
Ghost Ship: the idea that what is essentially “reading and writing” is somewhere to the right of Mussolini is itself somewhere to the left of Pol Pot 😀 (I apologize if I’m the only one laughing).

Posted by: Sunny Runny Burger | Jan 16 2020 23:21 utc | 149

@Debsisdead @77
“I had rather hoped that the name of the only truly great amerikan would not be used on this site as long as it is a spot used by warjunkies, plus some closet racists.”
I gather you are referring to me. My name is Deborah, and my friends call me Debs, nothing to do with Eugene Debs. I don’t see my posts as being warlike or closet racist either, I hardly ever comment.

Posted by: Debs | Jan 17 2020 1:27 utc | 150

S @ 130
“So I don’t think it’s fair to put all the blame on the Central Bank; rather, one should take a closer look at the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Economic Development.”
Those who advocate subordination of the Russian Central Bank to and all Russian economic policy formally under the office of the president ( see: Engdahl 7-2-16 : Russia’s Achilles Heel – Reflections from St. Petersburg ) rather than under the prime minister (the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation (Chapter 6, Articles 111 & 112)) face the need to amend the Russian Federal Constitution.
Perimetr @| 132
“I tend to trust the information provided by Sergei Glaziev.”
See: What does Putin’s staffing decision vis-à-vis Glazyev mean
8-24-19
Including this comment on the article cited on the above:

Larchmonter445
Very crucial analysis by Khaldey. This is not stuff in the news or forums.
As we move closer to 2024, understanding how Putin is making his chess moves domestically is imperative for those who value Russia and how a strong, resilient Russia is vital for world peace and the eventual end of unipolar hegemony.
So, our deepest thanks to Ollie and Angelina for this translation.
Babich, following his work in Belarus has moved to working with CIS nations and the EAEU. The power of Russia within these organizations is military and economic. There is no binding ideology. The promise of development and growth, spurred by attachment to Russia and integration with Eurasia is what matters.
The EAEU is firming entwined with China’s BRI, so the path is clear to those nations that the rest of the century they will benefit. However, the elites in Belarus and the Stans are like oligarchs anywhere. They want enrichment for themselves.
So, tough Russian liaisons like Babich have their hands full. We saw this with his interaction in Belarus with Lukashenko’s obstinance.
Having Glaziev handle the economic machinery for the EAEU is not about theory. It’s about getting results.
As Khaldey tells us, there will be no fifth column, no liberals, no saboteurs to the programs.
And somewhere in the construction of the platform for this is a possible new “position” for Putin to continue as the power of a Greater Russia. His EAEU could be the dynamics for a new Russian system of development.
Khaldey lays this out very nicely. And from it we can conjecture that Putin has a plan and it goes far beyond 2024.

Posted by: pogohere | Jan 17 2020 1:37 utc | 151

@ 150 debs… you have picked a name a poster who used to post here frequently used who went by the name ‘debs is dead’… he then started using the name ‘ a user ‘ more recently.. i thought he had switched by to a simplified version using ‘debs’.. thanks for clarifying that for us, although you might confuse a few folks here who miss your post @ 150

Posted by: james | Jan 17 2020 1:57 utc | 152

@152 James.. I’ve changed my user name, thanks for letting me know. Cheers.

Posted by: Deborah | Jan 17 2020 3:06 utc | 153

james @ 152; Remember DID well james. Was a excellent contributor here at MoA.
That’s going back some years.

Posted by: ben | Jan 17 2020 5:05 utc | 154

Debs @150
Debsisdead @77 is likely referring to me with his concern about “closet racists”, though I hardly count as closeted. I absolutely am a racist, with the caveat being that I correctly view race as a bogus social construct. My hatred and disgust is thus directed at phantoms that exist nowhere but in people’s minds; manufactured phantoms that too many people fixate on like a broken tooth, poisoning their minds and identities and blocking their natural instinct to develop class consciousness.
It saddens me to think that my posts may have contributed to Debsisdead going on hiatus as I largely agreed with and greatly enjoyed his posts. If my views on race were part of what caused his offence then that is unfortunate as the notion of race is an immaturity that humanity needs to overcome before our species can move on to its next level of achievement. Pretending that race is real and not real at the same time doesn’t get us there.

Posted by: William Gruff | Jan 17 2020 12:16 utc | 155

Gruffy, I think did‘s step-back may have been more a matter of some personal issue or perhaps sheer weariness, because I had found him generally getting more and more short-tempered and dismissive and shouty and unpleasant to read in his more recent posts (much though I valued his inputs) before going quiet, which he perhaps did partly out of respect for us here.

Posted by: Petra | Jan 17 2020 14:19 utc | 156

fyi John Helmer on this:
President Putin Tries Greening – Reduces Carbon Footprint of PM Medvedev
https://twitter.com/bears_with/status/1218073737456693248
“Putin has eliminated Medvedev from succession to the presidency, dressing it up as constitutional reform. Suspicions grow of Mishutin as oligarchs’ choice for PM…”

Posted by: John Gilberts | Jan 17 2020 14:24 utc | 157

@) William Gruff | Jan 17 2020 12:16 utc | 156 “racist”
If people did not have racial preferences, circumstantial factors, in sexual selection (and infanticide too) there would be little differentiation, pretty much no races – it’s biology.
From this self-evident reality we deduce that “racism” is ordinary.
However the term itself is not from biology, but from Trotsky’s Rhetoric – and it means that racial groups are prohibited from standing, illegitimate politically, against the Red Army. Not entitled to fight back against agencies that see to subsume them. In this it’s approximately analogous to “terrorist” – which is anybody you desire to murder.
This both “terrorist” and “racist” are labels that tend to create consent to murder an Nth group.
This is highly “undemocratic”.
Racism is fine. Bigotry is not… The line crosses when one race desires to dominate another and exploit it. This is Divide to Rule and schismogenesis (a technique developed by OSS/CIA and ongoing.

Posted by: Walter | Jan 17 2020 14:40 utc | 158

@John Gilberts #157
Indeed, it seems the “frenemy” setup between the Putin and Medvedev factions is now over.
And as John Helmer notes – the key now is what happens (or doesn’t happen) with Shoigu, Lavrov and Gerasimov. Was the Stavka annoyed that Medvedev was trying to manage their virtual war status? Or is it the other way around: Putin tired of Medvedev passing on the Stavka’s concerns?
There have been numerous instances in the past year where Shoigu/Stavka have put out radically different messaging than Putin.

Posted by: c1ue | Jan 17 2020 15:39 utc | 159

Why? Figure it out B.
Excellent article from Tom Luongo: https://tomluongo.me/2020/01/17/putin-purged-west-kremlin/
It’s all about protecting the Russian Federation from external manipulation, and nothing to do with Putin esconcing himself as a Supreme Leader. I predict Putin will not seek re-election post 2024, he knows he’s getting a bit long in the tooth. He will look to have himself replaced by a superior political system, with the Duma and Prime Minister having greater powers. That’s a democracy.

Posted by: Ant. | Jan 17 2020 16:25 utc | 160

William Gruff @156–
I applaud your view on race and racism. The concept of race as you well know was constructed by a combination of fear and desire to dominate, and is 100% biologically untenable. As I told my students, there’s only one race–the Human Race–and that we are all genetic mutts.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 17 2020 16:31 utc | 161

Dmitry Orlov, a Russian-speaking Russian in Russia, has some insights.

Posted by: john | Jan 17 2020 16:45 utc | 162

One does not employ hunting dogs to herd sheep, one uses sheepdogs. Hunting dogs are a race. Sheepdogs are another race. Not only do they look different, they behave differently.
Similarly swap out the Eskimo for people from equatorial Africa or the natives who live at 20,000 feet in the Andes. See how that goes. Me? Anglosaxon…I would die quickly at 20,000 feet…the native ladies have babies there. They are another race and can do this.
Any geneticist can tell you that race exists. I agree however that the term is primarily used to divide, exploit, distract, and rule. Primarily a tool in Rhetoric to manipulate the masses to the benefit of the rich and/or powerful.
And any honest person will tell you that they find one set of racial characteristics more congenial than another. Jared Diamond wrote to this characteristic…

Posted by: Walter | Jan 17 2020 16:50 utc | 163

I have long wondered what Putin might have in mind for a post-Putin Russia…and now we get our first glimpse. Actually, this is much more long-range thinking than expected, much more than just grooming a successor. He’s actually changing the structure to be one less reliant on any one man. He obviously understands the old observation that “There’s no better government than a good king, but there’s no worse government than a bad one.” Putin understands that the West, so long as it lasts, will be tireless in trying to foist a new Yeltsin on Russia, to finish the job he was supposed to finish (pretty bad when you’re too drunk and incompetent to properly ruin a nation). So the best long-term defense is to ensure that no one person will have the power to take down Russia. Obviously there may be some other benefits to the re-structuring and compartmentalization, and certainly the anti-dual citizen/carpetbagger restriction would be fantastic and wise.
As for those saying that perhaps this is part of a plan for Medvedev’s succession, that’s nonsense as Medvedev is un-electable. He’s pretty universally disliked. Of course, part of that may be by design, as Putin has been able to have him “responsible” for implementing some of the more unpopular–but probably necessary–domestic programs, acting as sort of a lightning rod to draw heat away from Putin himself. I will never trust him, since he has been the oligarch’s man from the start and doting over the West, but apparently Putin trusts him, or at least has perfected how to use him for the greater good. But a post-Putin political career for him? No.
Finally, I’ll just comment that with respect to the Central Bank issues, it’s true that they have become known as being much more Atlanticist than the rest of the government, and many of their policies have not been especially pro-Russian. But some of the monetary policies have been useful–whether intentionally or not. The weak ruble, during this time when sanctions have helped Putin to jump-start domestic industry and agriculture, has been a big help, making it even easier to convince people to “buy Russian.” And as for those wayward oligarchs being encouraged to re-patriate their wealth, there’s not much better argument than “you’ll get 62 rubles for your soon-to-be worthless dollars.” I think they haven’t been in any rush to correct that historical imbalance.

Posted by: J Swift | Jan 17 2020 17:51 utc | 164

Walter @163–
You are talking about different breeds of dogs, yet they all share the same basic genetics that allow them to inter- crossbreed. What exists are differing species, and the #1 rule pertaining to species is that they cannot sexually reproduce. Sure, you can create something artificial by gene splicing, but that’s known as genetic engineering, not natural selection.

Posted by: karlof1 | Jan 17 2020 18:41 utc | 165

@karlof1 #165
Walter confuses many things with race: genetic coding, genetic expression, cultural adaption, human innovation.
Eskimos are not adapted in any particular way for cold. Peruvians, many (but not all) have some genetic variance which enables tolerance of lower air pressure.
Yet white “race” people can live high in the mountains, even without assistance.
As for geneticists and “race” – what race is the child of an African and an Eskimo?
For that matter, there is greater genetic variations within the African group than between Africans and Eurasians.
Sadly, it seems Walter is more enamored of the social and cultural baggage associated with race. I do like his portrayal of different types of dogs as “race”; he apparently also considers breeds to be the same as race, even as the very term breed comes from the fact that a specific dog variant is simply a fixed subset of characteristics as opposed to a completely different species.

Posted by: c1ue | Jan 17 2020 18:52 utc | 166

Thanks for your insights, J Swift. I was reminded of Greived’s posts on the structure of China’s government, with the emphasis on merit, so that the person who is in the executive role comes there as having established some expertise in what is needed at the time. This in combination with regard for a ‘sovereignty bearing’ population is an attempt to provide flexibility under changing circumstances. You remind us that as the power bearing elements currently have been financial ones, and for the immediate future will continue to be,it has been well done for Russia that those hurdles have been negotiated well by the new prime minister.
I wouldn’t guess what position Putin will occupy in future. His concern for the country means he already has their gratitude, and should also have ours. When he gave that New Year speech it certainly warmed my heart. I am very sorry for what came immediately after that, but Russians should be very proud. Good leaders are hard to find – I’m glad I’ve lived to see it.

Posted by: juliania | Jan 17 2020 18:53 utc | 167

Sorry, misspelled Grieved – been away too long!

Posted by: juliania | Jan 17 2020 18:59 utc | 168

“Yes, there was a greater degree of Communalism during Feudalism primarily because of the paternalistic nature of relations–the notion being that the Feudal Lord was the father and his serfs his progeny to the point where he could exploit them however he pleased.” karlofi @147
Thanks, you make my point for me. I think that this reading of Feudal relations greatly underestimates the power of the people subordinated. In historical actuality serfs and peasants eroded most of the notional powers conferred by the legal system of the conqueror.
And this goes to for the property involved: it would have been news to most peasants to learn that the Lord owned their land, except in the most formal sense they owned it, on sufferance of the community as a whole. They, after all, could make the land valuable, the Lord could not-there was no land market to speak of- and land was much more plentiful than labour.
It was only under capitalism and its lawyers that the “ownership” of the Feudal Lord (which was always in fact, cf Eminent Domain, merely tenancy on s large scale) was transformed into private property. And the cultivators-the makers of the land, were reduced to propertyless proletarians.
The problem is that between the Scottish fucking Enlightenment and Stages theory and vulgar marxism capitalism has long been accepted as a form of progress instead of a system of theft on a massive scale and disenfranchisement.
Proposition #1: The serf in a manorial village had more power then his descendant in the C21st.
Rant suspended…

Posted by: bevin | Jan 17 2020 19:20 utc | 169

@ William Gruff #157
Thanks William. I only read the articles and comments section, I rarely comment. I agree about race, it was only a belief. With genetic research the science tells us we are one big family tree.

Posted by: Deborah | Jan 18 2020 1:33 utc | 170

Whatever your reason, this is why you can’t be taken seriously as a political analyst despite being on the ball much of the time.
“Trump is president and commander in chief. The buck stops with him”
Posted by: Daniel | Jan 17 2020 19:57 utc | 13
I agree in the sense that everything Trump ordered/claimed/happened-under-his-watch is his responsibility and should reflect categorically on his record. He owns the crimes committed. But I can also imagine a greyer world in which having only one point of the three-pointed elite triangle of power actively supporting him could force a limited bending of purpose toward the opposite of his intention with the ultimate goal of end-running the opposition. For example, pitching to the left while feinting hard to the right, thus targeting the areas left defenceless by the ruse. Only history will tell if the balance lands in humanity’s favour and absolves him of his crimes.

Posted by: Activist Potato | Jan 18 2020 4:38 utc | 171

It is not that Putin has become a socialist, it is that he, and his team, have taken some deductions from the huge demonstrations in Iran and France….
Proletarians of the world should never wait for 30 years for things to be fixed by a “fixed” seated president to get only crumbles from alleged turning “social-democrat” burgueoisie…before the fascist growing menace as counterpart…They just can take it, a fairer distribution of wealth, in a few weeks of strike, by paralizing economy and get the managerial/burgueoise class feel the economic lose..

Portuaires du Havre on dirait une armée, le mouvement est reparti✊ BFM en mode 😭 #greve16janvier #retraites #macron #france #giletsjaunes

https://twitter.com/LeGeneral00/status/1217843487758061568

100 years ago, the socialist revolutionaries Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht were tortured and executed by the proto-fascist paramilitary Freikorps, under the orders and approval of the Social-Democratic party of Germany.

https://twitter.com/PhilosophyCuck/status/1217645295862996997
Get the thing straight…Anti-Communism = Fascism…
https://twitter.com/ciruela_negra/status/1217857105891295232

“Der Marxismus muß sterben damit die Nation wieder auferstehe!”
“Marxism must die for the nation to be reborn again!”
A banner at the Berlin Sports Palace, where Hitler in 1933 gave his first speech as chancellor of Germany.

https://twitter.com/ramon_merkader/status/1073648279043362816

“… The struggle of the leader of the Great German Reich Adolf Hitler with the Bolsheviks is our struggle …”
From the order for the White Cossacks of the former tsar ataman, the Don Army, one of the leaders of the collaborationist “Russian Security Corps” of the Wehrmacht M.N. Grabbe of June 28, 1941.

https://twitter.com/ramon_merkader/status/1218255146209116161

Here is the appeal of Vladimir Kirillovich Romanov after the German attack on the USSR. Question to neo-monarchists, whom did he serve, Hitler or Homeland?

https://twitter.com/rishikesh_news/status/914417175271821312

January 9 – Bloody Sunday.
To expect grief or tears about this from the existing government and intelligentsia is pretty stupid. They shed a sea of tears for the execution of the royal family, but did not shed tears for the shooting of ordinary people.

https://twitter.com/_RedScare/status/950618633079844864

“And this is a modest gift”: Putin congratulated Tatyana Yumasheva on her anniversary and presented an imperial Chinese porcelain set”.

https://twitter.com/dimsmirnov175/status/1218267114517204993

Yeltsin’s granddaughter Maria Yumasheva considered the elite Theresianum school in Austria and her Vienna apartments to be “insanely boring”. Mother Tatyana, along with her husband, ex-head of the AP Valentin Yumashev, citizens of Austria, released Maria to live in London.

https://twitter.com/zgldz/status/984363895098929152
To see if you are able to awake…

Sorry to break it to you, but workers in the past who endured longer hours of work, more exhausting work, more police repression, little or no health care/education, etc. were able to organise revolutions without SocDem politicians making our exploitation more comfortable..

https://twitter.com/shy_communist/status/1217484291824742400

If you are not a socialist at 25, you have no heart. If you are not a communist at 35, you have no brain.

https://twitter.com/RickPaulas/status/1217906928116019200
To change something so that everything remains the same…El Gatopardo…

The people’s faith in miraculous changes is the best friend of the bourgeoisie.

https://twitter.com/KSyomin/status/944222397384839173

“The matter is in the class, not in the faces … No change of faces can change anything until the classes in power have changed.”
V.I.Lenin. Pravda, No. 37, May 4 (April 21) 1917

https://twitter.com/Communist_World/status/1217459015040622594

Mishustin opposed nationalization and the progressive scale of personal income tax.

https://twitter.com/rianru/status/1217722837114531840

I don’t understand something. Last year, the State Duma adopted a law on free hot meals for elementary school students. Why did Putin tell us this canned news today, and even as his initiative, and even with such PR hype? 🤔
Again makes a fool of ivyashka?

https://twitter.com/ramon_merkader/status/121751675527650

The message strongly reminded the recent distribution of money to Zhirinovsky “to children, the disabled, serfs, orphans, slaves” on Red Square. It’s just that the scale of the action and the surroundings are different.

https://twitter.com/ramon_merkader/status/1217492284633165825

“As long as capitalism is capitalism, the surplus of capital is not devoted to raising the standard of living of the masses of the country, as this would mean a decrease in the profits of the capitalists.” LENIN

https://twitter.com/ApuntesML/status/1214125065001996288

“If there is no change in the opinions of the majority of the working class, the revolution is impossible, and that change is achieved through the political experience of the masses.” LENIN.

https://twitter.com/ApuntesML/status/1214306246561533952

#JosefStalin worked tirelessly serving the people from age 15 until his death. He is hated and his legacy is feared by the imperialists because he led the working class in building a prosperous and peaceful life without #exploitation.

https://twitter.com/CPGBML/status/1214874923937804289

Posted by: Sasha | Jan 18 2020 15:25 utc | 172

Posted by: Sasha | Jan 18 2020 15:25 utc | 172
One link went wrong…for what it seems…one very important…

I don’t understand something. Last year, the State Duma adopted a law on free hot meals for elementary school students. Why did Putin tell us this canned news today, and even as his initiative, and even with such PR hype? 🤔
Again makes a fool of ivyashka?

https://twitter.com/ramon_merkader/status/1217516755276500993

Posted by: Sasha | Jan 18 2020 15:42 utc | 173

How things really are for on foot walking Russians…quite different that for US based Conservatives or far-right analysts ( military or not…) lying all the way around…

The new prime minister will be the head of the tax service Mishustin. After the approval of the candidacy in the State Duma, the formation of a new government will begin. The priorities are the digital economy – including Yandex support, national projects and business exemptions. Announced big spending on the social sphere. They promise to give maternity capital already for the first child, to make salaries not lower than the subsistence level, and to distribute housing to doctors and paramedics. However, Mishustin already made it clear: there will be no nationalization, pension reform will not be canceled, a progressive tax should not be expected.
Kudrin, meanwhile, expressed hope for accelerating liberal reforms with the advent of a new prime minister. Speaking at the Gaidar forum, the head of the Accounts Chamber stated that Mishustin is well aware of the business situation. At the same forum, Kudrin promised to implement Gaidar’s ideas on how to minimize state participation in the economy. For this, they promise to arrange total checks in state-owned companies.
There will be no free food for schoolchildren – at least, representatives of Concord, which supplies food to Moscow schools and kindergartens, said this. The company, formerly owned by Prigozhin, said it was 100 percent loaded and did not plan to increase capacity. But in the country, fast food consumption is growing – over the year the figure has increased by almost 20 percent. The reason is the lack of money and time for food among the population.
….American sociologists have linked the minimum wage to the level of suicide and found a direct relationship. According to the New York Times, an increase in the base salary of $ 1 lowers suicide statistics by 3.5 percent. About 50 thousand Americans annually take their own lives. This is 13 people per 100,000 population. In Russia – 26.
….In Kostroma, a strike at a shipyard – half of the team did not go to work after the news of the massive reduction. The company has been in a fever for several months, the last salary was paid in November, and then partially. For December, employees received only an advance of 2 thousand rubles. After negotiations with superiors, employees agreed to return to jobs. The arrival of owners from Moscow is expected.
At an ambulance station in Satka, Chelyabinsk Region, union activists are fired. Two employees lost their jobs for “gross violation of labor discipline.” In December, ambulance workers declared an Italian strike, demanding the return of their previous salaries – a new payment scheme deprived them of a third to half of their income. The chief doctor accuses the strikers of sabotage.
For two months now, patients of the Moscow Scientific Center for Children’s Health have been denied free diagnostics – parents sent a complaint to the Ministry of Health. All studies agree to do only for money, explaining this by the fact that within the framework of the compulsory medical insurance funds allegedly ran out. In the fall, they tried to fire transplantologists Kaabak and Babenko from the same center, who were returned only after complaints from the patients’ parents.

https://agitblog.ru/videoblog/galopom-po-evropam-137

Posted by: Sasha | Jan 18 2020 16:10 utc | 174

Some more realist analysis in harsh contrast with all those by US military analysts of Russian origins who promise from their blogs that their wholly supported Putin, is becoming a socialist…which he is definitely not…You recall how they all supported, and still support, Trump, to understand why they are trying you to believe that hoax…
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1217921584389861381.html

Posted by: Sasha | Jan 18 2020 16:32 utc | 175

Nikolay Azarov: Anti-Communism as a Means of Duping People
With opportune introductory disclaimer by Stalkerzone…

Stalker Zone disclaimer: the term “communism” has unfortunately been hijacked by liberals/globalists for the purpose of instigating “regime change” in Russia – pitting self-proclaimed “communists” against Putin. In reality, the definition of “communism” that Nikolay Azarov talks about below is the one that existed before Khrushchev came to power, before it started to become saturated by ideas from the West. It is a million miles away from the so-called Communist Parties of today, which are inherently liberal and oligarchical.

Posted by: Sasha | Jan 18 2020 17:53 utc | 176

To debunk traditional role of women in ancient Russian culture…some data come to light…so as to demonstrate that the current neo-medievalization of the world intended by paleo-conservatives has happened at other places before…
They discover in Russia the tombs of four Scythian warrior women

Posted by: Sasha | Jan 18 2020 19:13 utc | 177