Who is the UK?
British Workers – class composition of the UK
Land and the rentier economy

From a peak of 350,000 permanent dwellings constructed per annum in the late 1960s, construction activity has fallen to around 150,000 units per year. Land now accounts for 70 per cent of a house sale price. In the 1930s it was 2 per cent.
What happened? When Britain’s post-war housebuilding boom began, it was based on cheap land. As the book, The Land Question by Daniel Bentley of thinktank Civitas, sets out, the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act under Clement Attlee’s government allowed local authorities to acquire land for development at “existing use value”. The unserviced land cost component for homes in Harlow and Milton Keynes was just 1% of housing costs at the time.
But landowners rebelled and Harold Macmillan’s Conservative government introduced the 1961 Land Compensation Act. Henceforth, landowners were to be paid the value of the land, including any “hope value”, when developed. Today a hectare of land is worth 100 times more when used for housing rather than farming. Yet when an council grants planning permission, all the value goes to the landowner, not the public. Bentley says landowners pocketed £9bn in profit from land they sold for new housing in 2014-15. Major infrastructure projects such as Crossrail 2 and the Bakerloo tube line extension are estimated to cost the public purse £36bn. Landowners, meanwhile, will pocket £87bn from increased land values nearby. Some externalities!
[…]
Thus both the early 19th century political economists of industrial capital and Marx agreed on the need to nationalise land – indeed, it is in the Communist Manifesto But it has not happened. Instead, private ownership has increased and through inheritance has ensured the continuation of the same ruling elites for centuries. A recent study by two economists at the Bank of Italy found that the wealthiest families in Florence today are descended from the wealthiest families of Florence nearly 600 years ago! So the rise of merchant capitalism in the city states of Italy and then the expansion of industrial capitalism and now finance capital made little or no difference to who owned the wealth. When, in 1873, the government published the Return of Owners of Land, the most comprehensive survey of British land distribution since the Domesday Book, it came as no surprise that almost all the top hundred landowners were also members of the House of Lords. Just as predictably, 30 per cent of today’s Tory MPs are landlords.

Posted by: vk | Dec 15 2019 18:07 utc | 3

ominous that one of the main longstanding contentions of the neo-Nazis – that all Jews are Zionist agents and therefore one can’t separate anti-Zionism from anti-Jewishness as such – has become the mainstream position on the Jews. Sure, at the moment it’s being pushed by the Zionists in the name of aggrandizing the Zionist state. russ @4 <=two things: 1. where did you get the idea that Nazi considered all Jews to be Zionist? AFAICT it is the Muslims that adopted that stance? Can you support that claim with some kind of reference? 2) I think there is something much more treacherous in trying to merge Zionism with either members of the Jewish race or adherents to the religious claims of the Jewish religious establishments. Such a merger serves to cover for massive, undeniable frauds perpetrated over centuries by the groups that became supporters of or that joined the Zionist (while it is true in America at least, many of the Zionist were Jewish, millions of Christian Zionists exist in America today and most of them are not Jewish ). The Zionist manipulated and used the masses of Jewish people; herded them here and there to suit the economic and hegemonic purpose of the Zionist. If the Zionist can hide behind the skirts of the Jews, and garnish the christian as well as the members of the Jewish race to their cause; the Zionist will allowed to continue to use their propaganda to exploit humanity look

Posted by: snake | Dec 15 2019 19:10 utc | 5

FYI–FYI
Putin’s Annual Q&A will commence the 19th at noon Moscow time, with additional broadcast info and other trivia available at link.

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 15 2019 19:54 utc | 7

I think we have been looking at russiagate from the wrong angle
all along. It is actually all those russians who have been meeting
with their american counterparts that are american agents who were
colluding with the americans to interfere in russian politics. Yeah,
that’s it, and it is actually Putin who is the Manchurian agent rather
than Trump. The CIA has video of Putin getting a bj from Victoria Nuland
while he was helping her give out cookies to the nazies in Maiden Square.
Putin does whatever the US wants, like letting Israel bomb Syria at will, letting
the nazies run amok in Uraine, poisoning the Skripals, shooting down MH17, poisoning
russian athletes by spiking their food with PEDS, hating on the fags and dykes,
and poking fun at the munchkin Greta. Unbeknownst to many is that Greta is also
a sleeper agent. Putin has clandestine meetings with her at Dunkin Donuts to plot
with her how to destroy Russia. Here’s the clincher: Putin sings Fats Domino songs.
Pay special attention to Putin when he sings a Fats Domino song because it signals
that his manchurian programing has been triggered and he is about to launch a cruise
missile at the bundestag to start WWIII. The last time he sang Blueberry Hill the president
of Poland died in a plane crash, that’s how sinister it is. Also, Putin sneaks out of
the Kremlin late at night to eat at McDonalds where he colludes with The Big Macs and
the Large French Fries to become fat and ugly and splotchy like the Americans. Lastly,
Putin eats his glyphosate wheaties that he gets the hookers who peed on Trump to smuggle
in from the US while he watches reruns of Leave it to Beaver and I Love Lucy. What more
proof do you need?

Posted by: evilempire | Dec 15 2019 20:51 utc | 9

Asset stripping the UK begins with NHS

Posted by: uncle tungsten | Dec 15 2019 21:29 utc | 11

evilempire —hahahahhaahahhahahahahahhahahahahaha breathtakingly brilliant

Posted by: Miss Lacy | Dec 15 2019 22:41 utc | 13

As reported back on the 11th when the Evil Outlaw US Empire’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee forwarded a bill to the entire Senate that seeks to lay illegal sanctions on Turkey, Turkey replied that it would close Incirlik and an associated radar station at Kurecik. Today, it repeated that promise, this one delivered by Erdogan:
“It is important for both sides that the US does not take irrevocable measures… Turkey will, of course, respond to any US sanctions. If needed, we will close both Incirlik and Kurecik.”
As previously discussed, the S-400 purchase was done to protect Turkish airspace from NATO, specifically Greek warplanes, given the great tension surrounding Cyprus, which the Zionists just stuck their nose into and had their naval vessel chased from the area by the Turkish navy. Also contributing is Turkish support for the GNA in Libya.
Lots of eyes are looking at Lebanon and Iran as ignition points for the next war. I suggest looking at Cyprus and the myriad players involved there, many with a longstanding loathing of the others.

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 15 2019 23:37 utc | 15

Shaun @ 2:
Another article by Kit Knightly at the Off-Guardian goes to the heart of the point I see you making:
https://off-guardian.org/2019/12/15/the-afghanistan-papers-deep-state-narrative-management/
It’s a bit like calling 9/11 an intelligence failure. First, identify the actual measure of success against which this outcome should really be judged…
An excerpt:
“Here’s the real “secret history” of the Afganistan war: It wasn’t a failure, it was a success. In every facet, on every front, Afghanistan is exactly what America needed it to be. They dripfeed in the blood of young Americans, they destroy 100,000s of Afghan lives, and they reap the rewards they always intended to reap:
The permanent slow-simmer conflict gives them an excuse to keep thousands of US military personnel in a country which borders Iran, Pakistan AND China. (Not to mention a host of ex-Soviet states).
It keeps military expenditure nice and high, so Congressman, ex-generals and everyone else on the boards of Boeing or Lockheed Martin get great big bonuses every year.
They have sole access to the rare-Earth elements and other vital metals in the Afghan mountains. Lithium, most importantly of all.
They have control of the world’s opium industry. A vital cog in the relations of the US intelligence agencies, and organised crime. It’s essentially reverse money-laundering – turning tax-payer funds into dark money that can be spent hiring mercenaries, organising assassinations, arranging coups…or simply be stolen.
They have access to all the “radicalised” young men they could ever want. A little Jihadi farm, where “terrorists” can be named, trained and sent off to fight proxy wars in Syria, or spread fear and chaos in the West.”

Posted by: Paul Damascene | Dec 16 2019 0:29 utc | 17

This b recommends at his Twitter, saying “Some interesting and quite believable claims in this thread …”
Rudy Giuliani:
“Budapest | Kiev | Vienna
“After hundreds of hours & months of research, I have garnered witnesses & documents which reveal the truth behind this impeachment, which includes NO wrongdoing by @realDonaldTrump.
“These threads only touch the surface. Read & watch all. More to come.”
The following tweet:
“Evidence revealed that corruption in 2016 was so extensive it was POTUS’s DUTY to ask for US-Ukraine investigation.
“Impeachment is part of Dem cover-up.
“Extortion, bribery & money laundering goes beyond Biden’s.
“Also, DNC collusion w/ Ukraine to destroy candidate Trump.”
Need to separate the partisan chaff from the genuine evidence, but IMO b’s correct that there’s more than a few things here that will stick. One political cartoon in the thread comments is beyond apt.

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 16 2019 0:47 utc | 19

Evilempire #9
As hilarious as your post is, it may be closer to reality them you think (or at least more realistic then the blatantly dishonest “Russiagate”
Or “Trump fights muh Deep state” theories), considering the disheartening fact that their is massive U$ infiltration of the Russian government, using the Zionist Oligarchs who seized control of Russia’s industry in 1991 (research PROJECT HAMMER, which will simultaneously explain how the Eastern Bloc collapsed and what really happened on 911) and their good goys like Medvedev. Sadly, even though Putin has tried his best to root out the worst of these people (ie. the guy who tried to sell of Russia’s state-owned oil company to Exxon Mobil), and has done more then any other major world leader to oppose U$ imperialism (ie. annexing Crimea and saving Assad), this will probably not be enough to save Russia once he’s gone in 2024 considering how much of Russia’s Economy is still run by Zionist oligarchs and how infiltrated the Russian government is infiltrated by Zionist/U$ agents (ie. Medvedev and company). On top of this Putin himself has made some critical mistakes due to his Naive personality, especially his falling for Trumps phoney reset (Trumps policies towards Russia have been harsher then any president since Pappi Bush) and in the aftermath of that flop, running into the arms of “Red” China’s fake belt and Road which will be used to get Russia completely dependent on the biggest U$ satellite (“Red” China which is in reality a Neoliberal hellhole that is naught and paid for by Wall Street, and dropped any pretension of being Socialist once the Shanghai Stock exchange opened in 1990), which will proceed to backstab Russia at their next moment of weakness.

Posted by: 18481917 | Dec 16 2019 1:01 utc | 21

Last Thursday/Friday the US Fed posted a report of their end of year backstopping of the private finance world that I have not shared with fellow MoA barflies until now. Below is a link to a ZH article that lays out the details but I will provide some quotes for those that don’t want to read all about the latest NOT QE4 or ongoing raping of the American public
It’s D-Day For The Repo Market: On Monday $100 Billion In Liquidity Will Be Drained – What Happens Next?
The take away quotes
”
…..the Fed promised to inject no less than $500 billion in the next 4 weeks to avert a catastrophic freeze in the repo market as we approach the year end “turn”, which would consist not only of a continuation of the Fed’s T-Bill POMO, but also a massive injection of nearly $500 billion in overnight and term repos in the coming days.
……
This also means that by Jan 14, the Fed’s balance sheet would have grown by a cumulative $365BN in “temporary” repos, and together with the expanded overnight repos, and the $60BN in monthly TBill purchases, and by mid-January, the Fed’s balance sheet, currently at $4.066 trillion, will surpass its all time high of $4.5 trillion!
………..
In any case, when looking at tomorrow’s massive $100 billion liquidity drain, the repo market should be able to digest it without a spike in the G/C repo rate now that the Fed has effectively backstopped any and all year-end liquidity needs. If, however, the first repo prints come in elevated: at 2% or higher, it will mean that not even the Fed’s half a trillion dollar liquidity injection was enough, and that Pozsar’s fire and brimstone forecast is starting to come true.
”
The Pozar guy being quoted used to work for the US Fed, designed/set up the initial Fed REPO market and is now forecasting that things might blow up before the end of the year.
As I wrote at the end of my last comment
Maybe the house of cards will fall soon and humanity can pick up the pieces and evolve.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Dec 16 2019 1:33 utc | 23

Reset with Russia was Obama’s policy.

Posted by: lysias | Dec 16 2019 1:46 utc | 25

karlof1 @19
Anyone relying on Rudy is likely to be disappointed.
1) He’s under investigation himself (for Ukraine-related corruption!):

Five things to know about arrest of Giuliani associates
Rudy Giuliani Says He Received $500K From Indicted Associates.

2) He’s done everything he could do to join the swamp that Trump claims to want to drain (via various businesses that use his government connections).
3) And there’s much more evidence that he’s a creep, such as his having been divorced three times; his failure (as a mayor and former prosecutor) to protect 9-11 workers and to push for a proper 9-11 investigation; and more.
!!

Posted by: Jackrabbit | Dec 16 2019 2:58 utc | 27

evilempire
I nominate you for Bellingen sincere journalism award. You can collect your scoop of icecream curd at the exit.
Loved it.

Posted by: uncle tungsten | Dec 16 2019 3:27 utc | 29

jackrabbit #27
I just hope that Rudi gets to shoot first and accurate.
I share you low trust in this gold toothed rat.

Posted by: uncle tungsten | Dec 16 2019 3:39 utc | 31

Posted by: snake | Dec 15 2019 19:10 utc | 5
“where did you get the idea that Nazi considered all Jews to be Zionist?”
From the history of antisemitism, where else? Antisemites had already long been touting a Jewish world conspiracy by the time of the 1897 Zionist Conference. They seized on this as proof of this conspiracy, and on the subsequent forged “Protocols of Zion” as further proof. It continued from there, and the establishment of the Zionist state is taken as the ultimate proof of this conspiracy with Western governments being complicit.
Are you trying to whitewash the Nazis while smearing the Muslims? I can’t imagine why anyone’s thanking you for that.

Posted by: Russ | Dec 16 2019 6:15 utc | 33

OOPs on my post #29
Should be:
evilempire
I nominate you for Bellingcat sincere journalism award. You can collect your scoop of icecream curd at the exit.
Loved it.
Posted by: uncle tungsten | Dec 16 2019 3:27 utc | 29

Posted by: uncle tungsten | Dec 16 2019 6:50 utc | 35

I liked the article by Hitchens (‘In Praise of Telling the Truth’) linked to from the MOA site. Disappointing, though, to find it on the First Times website – this seems to be one of those ‘progressive’ outlets that’s obsessed with blaming the whole mess we’re in on gay people and (particularly) trans people. Really? Why are we still critical of what grown adults do with their genitals or who they choose to sleep with…isn’t that their decision? Isn’t the truth that if it wasn’t for those were different, who saw the world in a different way, who questioned, who challenged that we’d all still be in caves…
https://richardhennerley.com/2019/12/16/heres-to-the-freaks-heres-to-the-future/

Posted by: Richard | Dec 16 2019 10:37 utc | 37

U.S. economy shakes free of recession fears in striking turnaround since August
The author singles out low interest rates and the possible trade deal with China as the main factors for this alleged recession-avoidance.
Well, she’s wrong, 100% wrong. Her argument sounds even more absurd when you realize the trade deal has only now being seriously negotiated and is not in fact done yet(and not “since August”) and that the USA’s interest rates have been essentially zero or even in negative territory in real terms since 2009.
The reason the USA still registers relatively high GDP growths (in relation to its First World vassals) is that it is the financial superpower. The “real economy” in the USA has been in full stagnation or recession for years now, but Wall Street keeps beating records after records. That means the USA is suffering a problem of valorisation, i.e. a crisis of capitalism.
The USA will suffer a major recession soon. Prediction from the real experts forsee it most probable in 2020-2022. The American elite clearly knows that, and is doing everything in their reach to avoid that, so this monumental effort can delay it by some years – but it will come.

Posted by: vk | Dec 16 2019 11:36 utc | 39

to pogo here There’s also the whiff of some very over levered hedge funds (who also have access to repo bucks) Remember LTCM? Love yr moniker.

Posted by: Miss Lacy | Dec 16 2019 12:42 utc | 41

the nazis could have deported them, instead they deported jews from across europe to concentration camps.
from wiki–
The European Jews were targeted for extermination as part of a larger event during the Holocaust era, usually defined as beginning in January 1933,[8] in which Germany and its collaborators persecuted and murdered other groups, including Slavs (chiefly ethnic Poles, Soviet citizens, and Soviet prisoners of war), the Roma, the “incurably sick”, political and religious dissenters, and gay men.[d] The death toll of these groups is thought to rise to 11 million.[

Posted by: pretzelattack | Dec 16 2019 14:28 utc | 43

…
It is pure evil to conflate Jewishness by accident of birth or indoctrinated religion with Zionism.
…
Posted by: uncle tungsten | Dec 16 2019 3:35 utc | 30
I beg to differ.
The Jews who live in “Israel” and kill Palestinians, steal their land and terrorise their children, call it the Jewish State.
Jews who don’t live in “Israel” call it the Jewish Homeland.
If there were enough Good Jews to stop the Zionist Jews from diminishing the lives of Palestinians in order to steal their land then they would have succeeded – already.
But there weren’t, and still aren’t, enough Good Jews to stop the savagery and theft of the Zionist Jews in “Israel”.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Dec 16 2019 15:40 utc | 45

vk – 44
The Nazis goal has always been the purification and “improvement” of men by wiping out undesirables, be they “races” or disabled people. The plan for Jews in the 1930s was deportation because downright immediate genocide would’ve caused trouble, would’ve been a lot to handle, and wasn’t deemed necessary at this step of the Nazi conquest of the world. Since they planned to take over the planet, deporting Jews in (mostly inhabited) Uganda or Madagascar wasn’t an issue; they would eventually conquer the place as well and eventually be able to exterminate them all – just like the Nazis didn’t bother to invade Switzerland or Sweden as long as they stayed neutral and were of some use, since these minor countries would eventually be annexed once bigger European powers like USSR and UK would be out of the way.
When fast victory vanished, part of the Nazi hierarchy went into some kind of panic mode, and for the nasties most blockheaded ideologues, wiping out the Jews became a top priority, even to the cost of the war effort. Since the German economy was already in tatters, they went to great pain to make as much profit as possible from the camps, even during the extermination phase.
The great mistake people make about WWII and the Nazi program is that they assume the Jews were the main target; they were quite possibly the most odious one to Nazi leaders, but a lot of other people were on the hit-list. We speak about the Jewish Holocaust and not about the Slav or Black Holocaust because the Nazis were stopped before they could actually go to the next step of the program – and also because the first target, the Communists, weren’t as numerous and were soon enough considered the main Enemy, once WWII was over, so better forget about it.

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Dec 16 2019 15:59 utc | 47

Posted by: pretzelattack | Dec 16 2019 16:17 utc | 48
“seems like i’ve read the first target of nazi executions was retarded kids, but i don’t remember where.”
The first formal extermination program was the euthanasia program targeting the mentally retarded and insane in asylums, which began at the same time as the attack on Poland and was officially discontinued under domestic pressure in the summer of 1943 (though “off the books” it continued where it could be done quietly).

Posted by: Russ | Dec 16 2019 16:38 utc | 49

@ Posted by: snake | Dec 16 2019 17:04 utc | 50
Capitalism is definitely not a game, and I discourage anyone from making such metaphors in these kind of analysis.
Competition, albeit essential, is not exclusive to capitalism. Deng Xiaoping reforms of 1984 implemented SOE competition. Competition exists even in nature, between species and specimens. More importantly, competition is just an abstract concept.
Capitalist competition always ends with a winner. The winner is the monopoly. The process of monopoly formation Marx called “centralization of capital”, the process in which the capitalist devours other capitalists in order to form bigger capitals. Monopoly is not the opposite of competition, but its result, its logical end.
Profit rates tend to zero because the organic composition of capital tends to rise, not because of competition. When capitalism becomes “too big”, it becomes more and more difficult for it to reproduce the part that already exists with the newly available mass of surplus value.

Posted by: vk | Dec 16 2019 17:28 utc | 51

shaun @ 2.
Yes, the .. hmm, serious frown, then wink-wink oopsey we ‘goofed’ story.
… Upholding the myth of the US as a bumbling do-gooder. The soldiers, the best guys ever, the most principled, tough, honest, giving their lives for democracy, a true holy sacrifice …
Since the 2001 US invasion of Afgh. (btw was given the green light by the internationals before 9/11) and now coming up to 20 years later, stories about corruption, mismanag., dire mistakes, suddenly emerge.
All that means is that the op is to be wound down (played out, thrashed, no longer any use, etc.) or conversely that all is in hand (drug trade) and there is no longer any need to invest too much.
vk. at 3. i tried at some point to grasp who actually owns Land in GB.
This blog is +++ (England only)
https://whoownsengland.org
see also (initiative by same)
http://map.whoownsengland.org
book (haven’t read it)
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Owns-England-Guy-Shrubsole/dp/0008321671
Land ownership is apparently very secret. (This also ties in with EU Subisidies and Brexit.)

Posted by: Noirette | Dec 16 2019 17:59 utc | 53

snake @ 5 says:
I think there is something much more treacherous in trying to merge Zionism with either members of the Jewish race or adherents to the religious claims of the Jewish religious establishments
the Jews are not a race and Zionism as an ideology is somewhat of a smorgasborg, even if it primarily advocates for the (apartheid) Jewish state, which was not long ago enshrined in law.
a pivotal moment in the annals of Zionism and the State of Israel(Benjamin Netanyahu)
yes, the legacy of the Judeo-Nazis.
the German Nazis had roots in Islamic fundamentalism, too. Haj Amin Muhammad Al Husseini, the once grand mufti of Jerusalem, while in exile in Nazi Germany in 1944, issued a decree to kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion, and recruited Bosnia Muslims for the German Waffen SS who were apparently responsible for the murder of most of the Yugoslavian Jewish population.
so, expressed as a Venn diagram, there’d be a logical overlapping of Nazis, Jews, Zionists, and Islamic fundamentalists.

Posted by: john | Dec 16 2019 18:21 utc | 55

@Posted by: evilempire | Dec 15 2019 20:51 utc | 9
The thing is that most probably what you say here as an intent on satire could carry some if not great truth….
That Putin and many in his cabinet love US style of life is a known fact ( in words of Maria Zakharova she loves being in NYC…). For example, why he chose to perform, amongst the millions of songs in the world of music out there, “Strawberry Fields”, and not “Granada”? I will tell you, they do not willingly overthrew the USSR to become a Spain of tres al cuarto, all the more with the bunch of communist there are and always have been in such a country, no, they did it to become the US of the East. This is why Gorbachov even made money advertising US Pizza franchises…
See how in Rossiya 1 they see it quite acceptable, that the man that for action or inaction opened the door to those who provoked the death of around 12 million Russian people because of sudden degradation of living standard and evaporating of their savings, ended living in the US, giving lectures there and in Western Europe, and promoting US junk food…
Related to Greta, you are not so misdirected either, since the circle begins to close…. It is simply a performance that those in the side of far-right or so called “populist right” ( where could be place Putin…) express fake opposition to Greta, while insisting in the climate change hoax, since Greta works for the same corporations/hedge funds they so do, or sold their country to…Here Greta supporting Joshua Wong…and Joshua Wong supporting Greta…
https://twitter.com/ciudadfutura/status/1206316837002260480

Posted by: Sasha | Dec 16 2019 18:49 utc | 57

juliania @54–
Marx saw capitalism as “good” in that its contradictions would bring about its antithesis, Socialism, but the forces of Reaction intervened to extend the “Era of Contradictions” which is now nearing its temporal end as it’s quite clear the Paradigm will change. But what will it become is one of the questions we explore here. The calamity experienced by the volcano tourists can be visited upon unexpecting/unprepared people at almost anytime. The changing Climate is whipsawing Australia as its tectonic plate moves northward at the impressive rate of 6-7 Centimeters/yr (by comparison, I’m only moving West on the North American Plate at 1-2 Millimeters/yr). IMO, in 100 years, Aussies won’t be living where they are now as their urban landscapes become untenable. Did you read Pepe Escobar’s two-part travel series on the Pamir? Roof of the world, indeed! And it keeps growing taller faster than the climate can currently erode the rock. Yet humans make a living there and have for centuries. Amazing, yes? Two of my anthropological questions seems to have been answered: Where did the Vedic peoples (they were fire and sun worshipers) migrate to? and Where did the Zoroastrians (fire and sun worshipers) come from?
Hope you’re prepared for more snow as Solstice approaches!

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 16 2019 19:12 utc | 59

vk @58–
Nazism began in UK during 19th Century atop roots much older based on racist ethnocentrism and Feudal economics brought there by Romans. You need to look into where Cecil Rhodes and brethren acquired their ideas.

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 16 2019 19:26 utc | 61

In relation to the post of mine who was wiped out in the last Open Thread, where I had translated in part an article by Professor VincenÇ Navarro on the EP Resolution to equate nazism and communism as culprits of initiating WWII, along with proscribing communists symbols and ideas, an event proving that my point was true has just happened in Spain.
My point is that through this resolution, what it is intended is not the equally demonization of nazism and communism, but the demonization of communism and whitwashing of fascism, since when voting in the UNSC for forbidding nazi expressions and symbols, the EU as a whole abstains, with the US and its satellites in Eastern Europe voting against the motion….
What has happened in Spain is the following:
The Rayo – Albacete match suspended for insulting Zozulya
The match was taking place in Vallecas, Madrid antifascist neighborhood and home of Rayo Vallecano team. Chants coming from the background of the stadium calling Ukrainian player of Albacete team, Zozulya, “puto nazi”, got with the match suspended because the team where the nazi Zozulya plays refused to continue playing if nazi Zozulya was continued being called nazi, in a first time event, when futbol matches, have been places where all kind of insults have been proferred against the most varied range of persons…including black people…
The thing is that calling Zozulya “puto nazi” is not an insult, bu ta description…See for yourself…
https://twitter.com/madridistafiel/status/1206335058816225280
https://twitter.com/Klkautsky1/status/1206315438801670145
https://twitter.com/Herrera_JH_/status/1206318144027013121
https://twitter.com/ciudadfutura/status/1206341731861614592
https://twitter.com/Nicknonimo/status/1206323682530013185
https://twitter.com/bukaneros92/status/1206319334844502018
https://twitter.com/Electronzurdo/status/1206346282958303232
https://twitter.com/castrocalo/status/1206352388820553731
https://twitter.com/Bundesliguero/status/1206328111459119104
https://twitter.com/sacedator/status/1206354739077767168
This morning I had breakfast hearing in the Basque public radio that the match was suspended because of “hatred expressions”….Then, I guess yo uwould not be surprised, I went piss to the bathroom and took no drop…Current Basque government is right wing…in power non stop since 40 years already….
Now, tell me this is not an insititutionalized goal.
What it is is intended here is demonizing communist ideas since those will be who mainly will oppose the coming IV Reich needed when the skies are fallen, hijack “socialism” as fake denomination of fake opposition to the Reich, and whitewash nazism as acceptable political option and social stance which will took over.
This way, if you do not have noticed, the architects of all this, the “alt-right”, are subtly turning the political correctness in favor of nazism, and claiming “safe spaces” for the nazis now, while the new scapegoat are the communists.
If you do not see this subtle slow contruction, it is because or you are in favor of all this, or you are not paying enough attention.

Posted by: Sasha | Dec 16 2019 19:34 utc | 63

@ karlof1 | Dec 16 2019 18:32 utc | 56
Seems you have added another item to my ‘to read pile’. Turn about is fair play so from that pile I’ll offer:
Jared Diamond, Upheaval, How Nations Cope with Crisis and Change, ISBN 078-0-241-00339-8
which caught my eye on a recent excursion into a favourite book-vender (from yet to read pile).
About your “His essay well proves his thesis.”, I would hope you trust the reader to determine what is proof or not. Maybe asserting his essay supports his thesis might allow that liberty of decision.
As for Breton Woods, having read John Maynard Keynes’ accounts themselves, there is precious little evidence anyone writing on the subject today has the foggiest idea what they are talking about, but, like their constitutional right to have an opinion will exercise that right, even when they have nothing to say, will say it anyway. If you don’t have the foggiest idea where you have been, don’t know where you are now, how can you ever hope to navigate to the place you wish to go?

Posted by: Formerly T-Bear | Dec 16 2019 19:45 utc | 65

Sasha @63–
I saw RT published an article about the Zozulya incident. All forms of supremacism must be condemned for the tool it is designed to be–a hammer aimed at crushing solidarity.

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 16 2019 19:49 utc | 67

@Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 16 2019 19:49 utc | 67
I find that article too mild, and kinda defending Zozulya, fitting well with the current u-turn I am noticing in the current Russian administration….
They were precisely futbol affictionates of Dinamo of Kiev who directed by nazi Right Sector operatives, amongst them Serhyi Sternenko, burned alive dozens on people in Odessa and finished those who were trying to scape from the fire by heavy beating.
The Ukraine army, who this article says Zozulya says is what he supports, is the official army of a nazi state, ruled by nazis, and trained by the orchestrators of nazi coup d´etat and promoters of the current wave of nazism through their ideologues like Bannon. Zozulya does not support those who deserted, but those killing his own nationals in Donbass…i.e. the nazis…That, an article in an official Russian media should clarify enough…

Posted by: Sasha | Dec 16 2019 20:30 utc | 69

@Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 16 2019 19:37 utc | 64
The Unz Review, to be Paleoconservative, in case that is a good thing to be, publishes and allows way too much comments which could be labeled white supremacist and even nazi. All that stuff about IQ they have ubiquitous and which overhwelmingly prevails there is simply nauseating
Most of the rewritting of history, on equating communism and nazism and whitewashing of nazism we are currently seeing going official everywhere started in webpages like that and those supporting Trump´s presidency.
What a Paleoconservative is supposed to be? Another invent on whitewashing I fear…Do not tell me, Pat Lang is a “paleoconservative”…the man who always praises Franco from his blog…We are supposed to think that Franco was alos a “paleoconservative”…
You notice how they, the far-right, diversify their political/electoral options so that offering of them from the most extremist to the, apparently, most sounding acceptable/democratic/constitutionalist. Then, once grabbed power, by any of their multiple tentacles, they allign all togetehr to crush social policies…This happens all the time in Spain, and happens in the US too..

Posted by: Sasha | Dec 16 2019 20:43 utc | 71

karlof1 @ 64 says:
If you explore Unz’s writings, you might be surprised what you find
yeah, i agree.
is it just a coincidence that the major piece i linked to @ 55 was written by Ron Unz?

Posted by: john | Dec 16 2019 21:10 utc | 73

@Posted by: 18481917 | Dec 16 2019 21:06 utc | 72
Sorry man for not having answered you again on that post, but I just am refusing to repost what I have already posted and have been disapeared or banned, just do not have the time, and do not want to use the extra energy.
But I will be posting more or less thte same points kept in other way in my next comments, thus you will be able to test my stancee eventhough I am not adressing you personally.
Anyway, as I can see your insistence, I will try to remake my points made to your first post.
You told me I was being too though on Putin, and I anwered that one is never too tough on a leader who holds such power of legislation at home, veto at UNSC, and military might…
On what you say about saving Crimea and Assad, I precisely pointed out that in both cases he was saving his military interests….but could have done more for the people…
With respect to China, I feel that their stance is not so suspicious as it is becoming for me that of Putin´s Russia, since they, after all, are communists, although with Chinese characteristics ( i. e. with capitalist hints…But I do not know what China would do were the world to turn into totalitarian world order of fascist characteristics…

Posted by: Sasha | Dec 16 2019 22:19 utc | 75

john @73–
Thanks for your reply! No, I’m not surprised in the least that Unz wrote such an article where he makes a major point that’s being debated in the Max Blumenthal thread:
“This sort of astonishing counter-factual possibility is not nearly as totally absurd as it might sound to our present-day ears. We must recognize that our historical understanding of reality is shaped by the media, and media organs are controlled by the winners of major wars and their allies, with inconvenient details often excluded to avoid confusing the public. It is undeniably true that in his 1924 book Mein Kampf, Hitler had written all sorts of hostile and nasty things about Jews, especially those who were recent immigrants from Eastern Europe, but when I read the book back in high school, I was a little surprised to discover that these anti-Jewish sentiments hardly seemed central to his text. Furthermore, just a couple of years earlier, a vastly more prominent public figure such as British Minister Winston Churchill had published sentiments nearly as hostile and nasty, focusing on the monstrous crimes being committed by Bolshevik Jews. In Albert Lindemann’s Esau’s Tears, I was surprised to discover that the author of the famous Balfour Declaration, the foundation of the Zionist project, was apparently also quite hostile to Jews, with an element of his motivation probably being his desire to exclude them from Britain.” [My Emphasis]
While Unz and I have differing political viewpoints, we both share the quest for objectivity, which ought to be considered a fundamental conservative value, not something leftist at all. Admittedly, I don’t follow Unz nearly as closely as I should, so I thank you again for your reply and link to his important essay!

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 16 2019 23:09 utc | 77

Sputnik kinda whitwashing Zozulya…obviating the multiple images are there in the networks of him with hairdo and images of Stepan Bandera and supportive of Pravy Sektor, and publishing instead some from a Twitter account who shows him as kinda “good guy”…
Thus, not, the Russian administration is not changing ( by whatever ongoing negotiations…) …it´s all my imagination…and Zozulya is not a nazi…Aaayy, how much I remember the poor Mozgovoi…
Zozulya is a Banderist, i.e. a nazi, and everybody in the Spanish antifascist movement knows it, this is why we do not want this nazi playing in Spain…

Posted by: Sasha | Dec 16 2019 23:46 utc | 79

Sasha @80–
Mein Kampf isn’t required reading at any level of schooling until you get to grad level seminars. I didn’t read it until I was in my late 30s doing self-directed study while living in Hawaii and working at U of H Manoa. Admittedly, many find the rise of Nazism and Hitler oddly fascinating and are more curious as to why than wanting to become like them. Shirer’s 1960 The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany is what I saw many people reading as I grew up during the 1960s, which is where I first read any references to Mein Kampf.
Within the Outlaw US Empire, history’s taught very poorly nowadays, something I wanted to make a difference in when I trained to teach. I know I succeeded but touched too few people. IMO, trying to do more is why we comment here.

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 17 2019 0:23 utc | 81

Have you call me Nazi? Match suspended!

https://twitter.com/niporwifi/status/1206323983982964736
And, according with the newly released stick of measure, you are besides a racist!

Posted by: Sasha | Dec 17 2019 0:43 utc | 83

@Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 17 2019 0:23 utc | 81
As you have such pedagogic vocation, could you define for me the term “Paleoconservative”, and delineate in a nutshell what this ideology is?

Posted by: Sasha | Dec 17 2019 0:56 utc | 85

I just came across this comment in Naked Capitalism’s Links – thought it very helpful:
OpenThePodBayDoorsHAL
December 16, 2019 at 4:17 pm
No matter how much one hates The Orange Man one should hate even more an attack on the Republic.
So by all means let’s vote to be rid of the man.
But normalizing the removal of an elected president because the opposition party happens to have more votes in Congress: is that *really* the precedent we want to set, for the other team to use if/when they please?
The source is Alan Dershowitz but he does know a thing or two about the Constitution:
These two grounds – abuse of power and obstruction of Congress – are not among the criteria specified for impeachment. Neither one is a high crime and misdemeanor. Neither is mentioned in the Constitution.
Both are the sort of vague, open-ended criteria specifically rejected by the framers.
They were rejected precisely to avoid the situation in which our nation currently finds itself.
Abuse of power can be charged against virtually every controversial president by the opposing party.
And obstruction of Congress – whatever else it may mean – cannot extend to a president invoking privileges and then leave it to the courts to referee conflicts between the legislative and executive branches.
Hamilton feared that vague criteria would allow a majority of the House to impeach a president from the opposing party just because they had more votes than the president’s party.
He called that “the greatest danger.” Madison worried that open-ended criteria, such as “maladministration” would give Congress too much discretion and power, and turn our republic into a parliamentary democracy in which the chief executive serves at the will of the legislature.
To prevent these dangers, the framers settled on criteria with well-established meanings: treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.
The House Democrats are simply ignoring these words and this history, because they have the votes to do so.
They are following the absurd notion put forth by Congresswoman Maxine Waters that when it comes to impeachment “there is no law,” and the criteria are anything a majority of the House wants it be, regardless of what the Constitution mandates.
This lawless view confuses what a majority of Congress can get away with (absent judicial review) with what the Constitution requires. It places Congress above the supreme law of the land, namely the Constitution.
Were Congress to vote to impeach President Trump on the two proposed grounds, its action would be unconstitutional.
According to Hamilton in Federalist 78, any act of Congress that does not comport with the Constitution is “void.” This view was confirmed by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison and is now the law of the land.

Posted by: juliania | Dec 17 2019 4:22 utc | 87

The road on the roof of the world is China National Highway 318 from Shanghai to Tibet. There is even an Everest Road that branches from it and reaches North Base Camp. You can take a tour bus to get there. Really takes the sport out of getting to Everest base camp now.

Posted by: movement | Dec 17 2019 12:07 utc | 89

Im not sure if this has been addressed, but Syrian Perspective seems to have been wiped out….
Canthama? Igor?

Posted by: Chevrus | Dec 17 2019 15:53 utc | 91

In a clear and desperate attempt to crush the rise of socialism, French police brutally assaults protesters with tear gas in blatant violation of Human Rights [/sarcasm]:
Police use tear gas against French pension reform protesters in Paris (VIDEOS)
–//–
Lighthizer has been used here as some kind of legitimate source. Well, how about this gem:
US Trade Deficit Can’t Go Down Without Reduction of Imbalance with Europe – Lighthizer
Those damn Europeans! If they willingly capitulated and gave the USA their own industries on a silver plate, we wouldn’t have the need to threaten them with tarriffs!

Posted by: vk | Dec 17 2019 16:04 utc | 93

For those curious about cryptocurrency – a credible (to me) breakdown on what likely happened at Quadriga. Short summary: founders are both long-standing scammers.
Quadriga breakdown by Vanity Fair

Posted by: c1ue | Dec 17 2019 17:30 utc | 95

Sasha @85–
The term paleoconservative was coined to demarcate such people from neoconservatives, with the former imbued with the political and social values of traditional conservatism, a credo that’s actually antiwar and pro-peace, which is diametrically opposed to the neoconservative doctrine, which is actually quite radical. Other demarcations exist as well, but what I’ve described is the most important and visible, IMO.
Traditional Conservatism is a longstanding global credo based around family, community and church (although the religion worshiped could be any type, not just Abrahamic), and is closely tied to its agrarian roots. Change is fine as long as it promotes family and community. Look at the US Constitution’s Preamble, and you’ll read such Conservative doctrine.
Formerly T-Bear @88–
Must second your appraisal and answer to juliania.
Must call attention to Federico Pieraccini’s Strategic Culture article “Never Trust a Failing Empire”. I used part of this article in dealing with the veracity issue thread as the title clearly signals it’s about credibility, the lack of which is one facet that makes the Outlaw US Empire Evil. Here’s a teaser:
“False or carefully manipulated reports paint a picture vastly different from the reality on the ground. The United States has never really declared war on Islamic terrorism, its proclamations of a ‘War on Terror’ notwithstanding. In reality, it has simply used this justification to occupy or destabilize strategically important areas of the world in the interests of maintaining US hegemony, intending in so doing to hobble the energy policies and national security of rival countries like China, Iran and the Russian Federation.
“The Post investigation lays bare how the US strategy had failed since its inception, the data doctored to represent a reality very different from that on the ground. The inability of the United States to clean up Afghanistan is blamed by the Post on incorrect military planning and incorrect political choices. While this could certainly be the case, the Post’s real purpose in its investigation is to harm Trump, even as it reveals the Pentagon’s efforts to continue its regional presence for grand geopolitical goals by hiding inconvenient truths.”

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 17 2019 18:11 utc | 97

Well, what an interesting how do you do to discover Martin Wolf, chief economics commentator at The Financial Times, has written a two-part editorial, “How to reform today’s rigged capitalism,” I discovered by reading this Global Times op/ed, “Listening to the call to save capitalism”. Wolf’s editorials might be behind paywalls here for pt.1 and here for pt.w2. I was finally able to access them via Wolf’s Twitter. The title to his second part is “Martin Wolf: why rigged capitalism is damaging liberal democracy.” Why this is so we’ve discussed at length here via the writings of Dr. Hudson, whom Wolf is essentially channeling in my quick skimming of his opinions. In the lead for part 2, Wolf writes:
“The answer needs to start with acknowledgment of the fact that something has gone very wrong. Over the past four decades, and especially in the US, the most important country of all, we have observed an unholy trinity of slowing productivity growth, soaring inequality and huge financial shocks.” [My Emphasis]
And here is his Hudsonian answer:
“So why is the economy not delivering? The answer lies, in large part, with the rise of rentier capitalism. In this case ‘rent’ means rewards over and above those required to induce the desired supply of goods, services, land or labour. ‘Rentier capitalism’ means an economy in which market and political power allows privileged individuals and businesses to extract a great deal of such rent from everybody else.” [My Emphasis]
It should be noted that Wolf’s opinions were republished by many organs of the global financial press in sharp contrast to Hudson who’s been writing in this topic for decades–almost 50 years now in fact!! Well, at least the problem’s finally being acknowledged. The Global Times writer provides this partial interpretation:
“Redistribution is the remedy for inequality; this is the theoretical framework Western establishment elites rigidly observe. They have no plans to rise beyond capitalist logic and the solutions to tackle inequality are well within the boundary of capitalism. However, their criticism is a stark revelation of today’s social reality. As Wolf puts it, ‘Money buys politicians. This is plutocracy, not democracy.’ He puts political reform ahead of economic reform. Without political reform, change in the way money in politics works and how the media works, the much needed reforms in other areas won’t take place.” [My Emphasis]
Golly Gee Whiz! Such political reform’s been demanded since the 1960s, and essentially was again demanded in a somewhat differing context by Sanders just yesterday–but only Sanders and Gabbard have floated the requirement for such reform, at least until now that Martin Wolf has joined them.

Posted by: karlof1 | Dec 17 2019 19:20 utc | 99