|
The MoA Week In Review – Open Thread 2019-71
Last week's posts at Moon of Alabama:
Related: John Barnett on Why He Won’t Fly on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner – Corporate Crime Reporter NTSB recommends Boeing redesign and retrofit engine casing on thousands of 737s – Seattle Times Problems Pile Up for Boeing as 737 Max Delays Continue – New York Times
>Meanwhile, Congress, following a hearing last month where it grilled Boeing’s chief executive, Dennis A. Muilenburg, is planning to hold a hearing next month at which it expects F.A.A. officials to testify about whether there are other problems with the Max that Boeing hasn’t yet addressed.<
There are at least three issues where the 737 MAX does not conform to current or even older regulation: – A turbine disk rupture could cut the unprotected rudder cables. – The manual trim can not be moved at higher speeds to correct stabilizer position problems. – The cockpit misses an integrated crew alert system (EICAS) and can confuse the pilots with a multitude of dubious alarms.
Related: House Democrat walks back remark favoring censure over impeachment – The Hill House Intelligence Committee to review impeachment investigation report Monday – The Hill Democrats have a better choice than impeachment – CNN
Related: U.S. Dems’ dangerous demagoguing on Russia – Helena Cobban – Just World News
Related: PETER HITCHENS: My secret meeting with mole at the heart of The Great Poison Gas Scandal – Mail on Sunday
— Other issues:
This should be a huge scandal:
ICE arrests 90 more students at fake university in Michigan – Detroit Free Press
>About 90 additional foreign students of a fake university in metro Detroit created by the Department of Homeland Security have been arrested in recent months.
A total of about 250 students have now been arrested since January on immigration violations by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as part of a sting operation by federal agents who enticed foreign-born students, mostly from India, to attend the school that marketed itself as offering graduate programs in technology and computer studies, according to ICE officials.<
Hong Kong:
Hong Kong protests: battered Polytechnic University faces six months of repairs as police say more than 10,000 petrol bombs seized from campuses across city – SCMP >University president Teng Jin-guang reveals that of more than 1,100 people arrested over campus siege, only 46 were PolyU students<
Assange:
The US trail of the man whose security firm spied on Julian Assange – El Pais The last paragraph points to a cooperation between the spy company UC Global and the Guardian which published the false claim that Trump campaign manager Manafort visited Assange.
Adam Schiff now finally learns who the "go-between" from Assange to Trump was. /snark Assange to Testify on Being Recorded in Embassy in London – New York Times
>The prosecutor and Mr. Assange’s allies argue that the C.I.A. was behind the spying. A spokesman for the agency declined to comment. After President Trump took office in 2017, the C.I.A. began espionage aimed at Mr. Assange, WikiLeaks and their ties to Russian intelligence, and the Justice Department began building a criminal case against him. … [The head of UC Global] signed a contract with Las Vegas Sands, the casino and resort company of Sheldon Adelson, and the prosecution contends that Mr. Morales passed information about Mr. Assange to security officials at the company, saying it acted as a go-between with the C.I.A.<
Sanctions:
What happens when big powers misuse trade and finances to hurt other powers: Poland repatriates 100 tons from London – Business Insider U.S.-based chip-tech group moving to Switzerland over trade curb fears – Reuters
Use as open thread …
From Michael Roberts Blog’s Facebook:
Chile – it’s not just the level of inequality and austerity in the country that triggered the social uprising against the elite. On the OECD’s ‘better life’ index, Chile scores very badly even compared to other Latin American countries.
Chile’s insurgency and the end of neoliberalism
The OECD index allows you to compare well-being across countries, based on 11 topics the OECD has identified as essential, in the areas of material living conditions and quality of life.
OECD Better Life Index
—
The Indian economy is heading into trouble – to all intent, in recession. The second-largest country in the world by population grew only 4.5 percent year-on-year in the third quarter of 2019, below 5 percent in the previous period and market expectations of 4.7 percent. That’s the weakest pace since the first three months of 2013, mainly due to a fall in factory output and exports and a slowdown in investment.
Investment, sluggish for nearly a decade, grew a mere 1 per cent year-on-year, down from 4 per cent in the previous quarter. Manufacturing output contracted 1 per cent. Infrastructure investment has collapsed.
The government has announced several measures to boost growth including a reduction in corporate taxes, concessions on vehicle purchases, bank recapitalisation. Meanwhile, the central bank has already cut borrowing cost 5 times this year and is seen lowering rates again next week.
See my post of last May on India:
India: another China or another Brazil?
–//–
This is a very interesting example of how Western (i.e. libera, capitalist) propaganda works, and also a very illustrative example of how capitalism declined from the point of view of a person who benefitted the most from it when it was at its apex:
Perhaps it’s time to remember Yuri Gagarin
The shock in the US was that the Russians were not only competitive, but had embarrassed US science and engineering by being first. In 1958, President Eisenhower signed into law the National Defense Education Act, and this enabled talented students to flow into science and engineering. The shock waves were felt throughout the entire educational system, from top to bottom. Mathematics was more important than football.
He’s right in the abovementioned paragraph. If you interviewed people who were 12-14 years old between 1958 and 1963, and asked about what would be the future of the USA in the year 2000, most of them would have more or less the same answer: that the future of America was scientific, bright, of high technology; a nation where scientists and engineers would be more more venerated than tv celebrities and football/baseball players. It would be the world of the infamous “flying cars” and space exploration and colonization.
Nobody in 1963 would imagine that the USA of the 2000s would be the USA of finance, of Wall Street; of football players, of the anti-vaxxers, of the flat earthers and of the Kardashians.
But they should’ve. The reason this degeneration happened is the fact that the USA is a capitalist society. In capitalism, scientific progress is accidental. What matters in the capitalist system is the valorization process, not the process of use value creation. Like any other societal formations, capitalism has a revolutionary period, an apex period, a decline period and a collapse period. In my opinion, world capitalism has just exited its apex phase and is now entering its decline phase.
Here’s the propaganda part of the article:
As demonstrated by the USSR, socialism does not prohibit scientific prowess. There is a difference, of course. Socialism’s success in the USSR came at the expense of millions of lives, the slave labor of millions more, and a lower standard of living. Nevertheless, the fact is that Yuri Gagarin was the first person to orbit the earth. In comparison to the US today, Soviet universities were not plagued by whining children – nor are today’s Chinese universities. The Soviets thought it wiser that their young study calculus and physics.
This paragraph encapsulates all the elements of Cold War propaganda about the USSR. When I read it, it felt like a blast from the past.
First, the image of the USSR as essentially a slavery society is a Western chimera. They come from Weber — who once theorized the USSR as a “modern Ancient Egypt” — and the propaganda from Solzhenitsyn, who hugely exagerated the number of prisoners in the USSR.
In fact, even at the height of the GULAG era, the USSR’s jailed population never went beyond 1.5% of its overall population (as we know now from Soviet official archives). That’s well within the world’s average. If only 1.5% of the population is able to sustain the other 98.5%, then even I want to know how the Soviets operated such an economic miracle.
Besides, the USSR obviously didn’t kill “millions of people” in order to send someone to space. That’s obviously absurd by any metric, logic included. First of all because this would never gather political consensus among the population, second because it is impossible to do rocket science with slave labor.
The quick rise of the Third Reich gave birth to the myth in the West that slave labor can operate miracles. Nothing is further from the truth. In Ancient times, both the Greeks and the Romans already knew slave labor was only economically viable in very basic and simple tasks, such as agriculture, mining and other domestic services. Athens achieved naval supremacy over Greece by using wage labor for its rowing and sailor crews, so that they could be professionals with high morale in the battlefield. The reason for this is that maneuvering triremes was an extremely complex art, too complex and valuable for the Athenians to trust to slaves. They also had, by the nature and complexity of the task, a naturally high degree of freedom from their “bosses”. Either way, the task was simply too complex for a slave to phisically learn, since a slave was kept into his/her place through physical deprivation and domination, and a sailor had to be always fit physically and mentally to wage wars at sea. The Spartans didn’t slave their coastal colonies, giving them a much larger degree of freedom (perioikoi), probably in exchange for a supply of sailors, ships. The Romans also did the same: when a slave became specialized enough in the family business (such as acting as a middle man in the paterfamilias’ businesses in some coastal city), he usually “gifted” him with his freedom.
In sum: even the ancients knew that, for more complex tasks, free people were a must. Slavery was only economically viable for very simple and denigrating tasks (specially, agriculture and mining).
As for the “lower quality of living”, that’s highly debatable. Surely, on average, the USSR certainly didn’t enjoy the same life quality than the top of the capitalist chain of the time. But inequality was much, much lower (almost negligible) except for the rural-urban divide, and there was no deprivation.
On average, life quality in the USSR was much better than the vast majority of the capitalist nations with the benefit inequality was negligible (so the average approached the median). Sure, it was no post-1980s Norway or Finland — but those are microscopic capitalist nations, with negligible population.
Posted by: vk | Dec 1 2019 16:45 utc | 3
|