Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
October 6, 2019
The U.S. Led Coup Attempt In Iraq May Further Weaken That Country

The current unrest in Iraq began a week ago after a prominent general was removed from his post:

Lieutenant General Abdul Wahab al-Saadi was the great Iraqi military hero of the war against Isis, leading the assault on Mosul which recaptured the de facto Isis capital after a nine-month siege in 2017.

But at the weekend he was suddenly removed as the commander of the Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) shock troops, the elite corps of the Iraqi armed forces, by Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi. He was instead given what the general considered to be a non-job at the Defence Ministry.

Saadi has refused to accept the move against him, and described his new posting as an "insult" and a "punishment". His effective demotion has provoked a wave of popular support for arguably Iraq’s most esteemed general, on the streets as well as on social media.

The CTS is a force that often cooperates with the U.S. military. Abdul Wahab al-Saadi is a U.S. trained officer. He was suspected to be the head of an imminent overthrow of the government.

For months there have been rumors of a U.S. instigated coup in Iraq:

Republic of Sumer @Sumer_Iraq – 14:30 UTC · Oct 4, 2019
Over two months ago, Qays Khaz’ali said:

There’s plans to change Baghdad government in November, with protests erupting in October. Protests not spontaneous, but organised by factions in Iraq. Mark my words

Qays Khaz’ali is a leader of Shia groups who twelve years ago fought against the U.S. and British invaders.

Sharmine Narwani @snarwani – 00:34 UTC · Oct 5, 2019
Al Akhbar newspaper says the govt of #Iraq learned 3 months ago of a planned US-backed coup by military officers, to be followed by street action. Time to be skeptical about events in Iraq?

During the last five days there have been protest all over the south of Iraq where the majority of the people are Shia. The protest escalated within a few days into shootings with over a hundred killed. In several cities party and government offices were burned and various groups hustle to take a position in the "leaderless" movement.

There are legitimate reasons for protests. The majority of the people in Iraq is younger than 20 years. The people have little chance of finding a job. The state is weak and many of its actors are corrupt. Services the state is supposed to provide don't get delivered. Electricity and water supply is often sparse.

But those are not the reasons why the protests immediately escalated into violence:

Liz Sly @LizSly – 22:19 UTC · Oct 4, 2019
Many Iraqi protesters are complaining of unknown snipers targeting them from rooftops, and it's possible they are aiming at both the demonstrators & the security forces.

Quote: Reporting Iraq @TFPOI · Oct 4
Protestors are confirming the use of snipers from buildings, targeting protesters approaching Tahrir Square.
A young man was killed by the use of snipers. Evidence in the form of a photo can be seen.
#iraq #baghdad #save_the_iraqi_people

During the 2014 U.S. coup in Ukraine the same method was used to inflame the country.

Al Sura @AlSuraEnglish – 15:36 UTC · Oct 5, 2019
#BREAKING – #Iraqi special forces launch search and destroy mission against unknown snipers that have killed at least 4 protesters across the capital of #Baghdad.

The snipers are not the only sign that the protests are not genuine:

Marc Owen Jones @marcowenjones – 5:59 UTC · Oct 4, 2019
[#Thread] 1/ This one is on #Iraq. A few people mentioned suspicious activity on Twitter and I had a look into a few hashtags. One in particular begins, "Show your support for the right of Iraq people to protest peacefully". I have little doubt there is an influence campaign…
[…]
4/ Firstly, as you can see from the below graph, the hashtags started trending quite suddenly at 3.30pm UTC on October 2nd. However one of the first accounts to post the hashtag was the one screenshotted here > @AlshiblyRamy – who has a lot of photos of Saudi and Iraq flags…
5/ The most salient measure of inorganic activity is accounts created in a short time frame. Of the 6500 or so accounts in the sample, 1,118 were created in just 3 days – October 1st, 2nd and 3rd. That's astounding – around 17% of the sample! #Iraq

The protests are part of the conflict between the U.S., its Saudi proxies, and Iran.

The immediate aim is to bring down the government under Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi who strove to stay neutral in the conflict between the U.S./Israel/Saudi Arabia and Iran:

The recent decisions of Abdel Mahdi made him extremely unpopular with the US. He has declared Israel responsible for the destruction of the five warehouses of the Iraqi security forces, Hashd al-Shaabi, and the killing of one commander on the Iraqi-Syrian borders. He opened the crossing at al-Qaem between Iraq and Syria to the displeasure of the US embassy in Baghdad, whose officers expressed their discomfort to Iraqi officials. He expressed his willingness to buy the S-400 and other military hardware from Russia. Abdel Mahdi agreed with China to reconstruct essential infrastructure in exchange for oil, and gave a $284 million electricity deal to a German rather than an American company. The Iraqi Prime Minister refused to abide by US sanctions and is still buying electricity from Iran and allowing the exchange of commerce that is bringing large amounts of foreign currency and boosting the Iranian economy. And lastly, Abdel Mahdi rejected the “Deal of the Century” proposed by the US: he is trying to mediate between Iran and Saudi Arabia and therefore is showing his intention to keep away from the US objectives and policies in the Middle East.

The violent protest in Iraq are part of a larger undeclared war against Iran.

A recent attempt to kill Major general Qassem Soleiman, the leader of Iran's Quds force, is part of it:

The suspects had plotted to kill Soleimani during the Ashoura religious commemorations on September 9 and 10, according to Taeb.

They sought to buy a property near a mosque built by Soleimani's father in the city of Kerman, dig a tunnel underneath the site and rig it with "350 to 500 kilogrammes of explosives", he said.

The team planned to "blow up the entire place" as soon as Soleimani entered the mosque for Shia mourning ceremony.

Taeb said the suspects "went to a neighbouring country" and "large sums of money were spent to train and prepare them" to carry out the attack.

New U.S. sanctions against Lebanese banks who allegedly support Hizbullah are likewise part of U.S./Israeli/Saudi effort to squeeze Iran and its proxies:

The Trump administration has intensified sanctions on the Lebanese militant group and institutions linked to it to unprecedented levels, targeting lawmakers for the first time as well as a local bank that Washington claims has ties to the group.

Two U.S. officials visited Beirut in September and warned the sanctions will increase to deprive Hezbollah of its sources of income. The push is further adding to Lebanon’s severe financial and economic crisis, with Lebanese officials warning the country’s economy and banking sector can’t take the pressure.

“We have taken more actions recently against Hezbollah than in the history of our counterterrorism program,” Sigal P. Mandelker, undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence at the U.S. Treasury, said in the United Arab Emirates last month.

Mandelker, who was born and grew up in Israel and is furthering its interest, recently announced that she will leave the administration. This might be a sign that the pressure policy against Iran and other countries will change.

Esfandyar Batmanghelidj @yarbatman – 18:06 UTC · Oct 2, 2019
Forget John Bolton, this may be the most enabling change in personnel if Trump wants to restart diplomacy with Iran and end “maximum pressure.” Mandelker is considered an unreasonable and dogmatic official by compliance officers worldwide.

But for now the riots in Iraq are likely to escalate.

Hiwa Osman @Hiwaosman – 21:16 UTC · Oct 5, 2019
Just in: Gunmen in balaclavas attacked the offices of the following TV stations in Baghdad: Dijla, NRT, Arabiya, Arabiya Hadath, Fallouja, Alghad Alaraby, Al-Sharqiya and Skynew Arabia. They ransacked the offices, destroyed their equipment and broadcast facilities. #IraqProtests

One demand of the protesters is a resignation of the government, another is the change of the election law to eliminate large party blocks in the parliament. Either would further weaken the country.

Comments

Willaim Gruff @84–
Thanks for your reply! I tend to agree that the power of the planet and its star are more than capable of providing humans with all the energy they require without burning massive quantities of fossilized carbon. I see fissile material as Sun Matter because of its properties and have always seen the waste issue as the problem requiring solving, and the Russians have. I posted a link to an article about ROSATOM’s completing the total cycle, and later another link to a ROSATOM PowerPoint slide set illustrating that and more. Kirby’s article and ROSATOM slide set.
China and Russia are busily creating products and services actually demanded by humans. The Outlaw US Empire doesn’t do that anymore as its prime focal point–it’s all about hegemony and control and gaining wealth through what amounts to extortion.

Posted by: karlof1 | Oct 7 2019 5:29 utc | 101

@flankerbandit | Oct 7 2019 3:12 utc | 98
“Yup…this ‘somebody’ and ‘donkeytale’ are putting up so much flack here on an ongoing basis that it is useless trying to read through comments…nobody would go to such lengths without an agenda…and most likely compensation..”
@ psychohistorian | Oct 7 2019 3:16 utc | 99
“… to not feed/respond to those known trolls at MoA”
Thank you! A good test for how adult you are. Claims without proof are always good food.

Posted by: Hausmeister | Oct 7 2019 7:14 utc | 102

Maybe by now we can ask the Iraqis if they are missing Saddam yet.

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayast | Oct 7 2019 10:37 utc | 103

:_)) LOL
Partisans are so stupid …..
I would never ever underestimate the ability of the US and Iranian regimes to have a secret deal.
This here is Hassan Rouhani as described by the Guardian in 2015

His credentials and intellect ensured a rapid rise and to the very heart of Iran’s government. He was commander of national air defence during the war with Iraq in the 1980s, and in 1986, as deputy speaker of parliament, took part in secret talks with the US over the arms-for-hostages deal that became known as the Iran-Contra affair. In 1989, the year Khomeini died, he was made secretary of the supreme national security council. “He is the ultimate insider,” a former Tehran-based diplomat said soon after his election. “He knows all Iran’s secrets.”

And there is William Barr of course.
Somehow Israel seems to be out of the equation this time. Maybe that’s why Epstein ….
But other Iran-Contra guys still do their job: This here is Elliot Abrams getting into trouble with narco-deals in Venezuela and Colombia.
Of course, this is not a “color” revolution
there is no branding at all
– where is the logo
– where is the color
– where is the slogan
no corruption? as a revolutionary slogan?
“corrupt” is used in political fights between oligarchs or in “investment activism”

Posted by: somebody | Oct 7 2019 10:55 utc | 104

karlof1 @101
Burning “spent” fuel down to the atomic equivalent of ash (stable isotopes) is the only realistic way to dispose of the tons of high level waste sitting in pools at power plants around the world. I certainly hope ROSATOM can make that tech economically viable.
As for an example of the US’ commitment to reconstruction, Aleppo is open for tourism. Raqqa, on the other hand, “liberated” from the terrorists by American forces at roughly the same time that Aleppo was liberated by the Syrian government, remains a devastated wasteland.
One need look no further than comparing the fates of these two cities to see that Iraq needs to expel the US before they can effectively rebuild.

Posted by: William Gruff | Oct 7 2019 11:21 utc | 105

This here is how the Iraqi government reacts to the protests – as seen from official Iran
– They make a distinction for legitimate protests and blame the killings on “malicious hands” suggesting they are mercenaries directed by “foreign embassies” (ie US and Saudi Arabia)
– They make sure “their” official security services are not involved in the killings

Interior Ministry spokesman Saad Maan confirmed for the first time on Sunday that 104 people had been killed, including eight security officers, and more than 6,000 wounded in the protests.
Maan said the ministry was working with other government institutions to find out who was behind the killings. According to medical sources, the majority of protesters killed were struck by bullets….
Parliament speaker Mohamed al-Halbousi echoed the premier’s remarks, saying that “infiltrators” were wreaking havoc. He said the parliament had formed a committee to investigate the matter.
Iraqi security officials have made it clear that their forces would not use lethal force against protesters unless their lives were in danger.

Plus – the “unofficial” “Iranian” militias declare to defend the government. They are outside the framework of the government and can simply “fight”.

Iraqi Popular Mobilization Units (PMU), or Hashd al-Sha’abi, announced Monday that it is ready to help prevent “a coup d’etat or a rebellion” in the wake of the violence.
Faleh al-Fayyad, the PMU head and Iraq’s national security Adviser, told reporters that he wanted to see “the fall of corruption, not the fall of the government.”

I think I agree with Chatham House analysis here that there is Shiite infighting. Yes Chatham house is imperialist but that does not mean their analysis is wrong.
There is a fundamental difference between Iran’s political Shiism and Iraq’s views on authority.
Sistani is the most respected “Jurist” in Iraq but he is among equals. Iran has a religious “supreme leader” who is a Khomeinist invention.
I doubt there is anyone in Iraq loyal to “Iran”. They are loyal to the religious leaders they choose. And a huge pilgrimage from Iran to Iraq means they accept their “Jurists”.
Jurists certainly consider fighters to be in their jurisdiction.

Posted by: somebody | Oct 7 2019 12:39 utc | 106

Patrick Cockburn at Counterpunch today seems to have drunk the kool-aid. For the same reason as Miss Lacy expressed on the open thread, I no longer post links.

Posted by: spudski | Oct 7 2019 19:42 utc | 107

Posted by: spudski | Oct 7 2019 19:42 utc | 107
The US constitution of Iraq is extremely federal and thereby disfunctional. The decentralisation of Iraq was intentional, to make sure Iraq would never again get military power. But decentralising it they could not solve the problem of oil resources not being evenly spread.
See a description of the problem here.
It was semi-intentional civil war. Iraqis knew what they were fighting for – oil reserves in a state federalized for income. Oil companies prefered to deal with powerless locals to being confronted by a powerful state. To make that happen the US engineered a sectarian interpretation of Iraqi society.
I don’t buy the big sunni shiite confrontation on the ground. Read the biography of Adil Abd al-Mahdi and you understand why. I also don’t buy the big Iraq/Iran sectarian friendship as Saddam Hussein managed an acrimonious war with a Shiite majority against Iran.
See eg this CIA assessment here which states that Saddam Hussein has the support of Iraq’s Shias.
I also don’t buy the big Shia-Sunni conflict for a very simple reason – they intermarry without any religious problems. If you are a truely believing Catholic you still cannot marry a Protestant.
It is possible that Iraquis want their centralized state back and see a chance now that Saudi Arabia has to find peace with Iran.
Look here – yes I know it is from the UAE.

The electoral commission announced that the Iraqi Communist Party (ICP) had attained just two seats in parliament. But, crucially, their coalition with Mr Al Sadr’s Marching Towards Reform bloc (Sairoun) may give them a voice in the next government.
Forty-four year old Sadr and his coalition partners were able to capitalise on public resentment over the current administration’s failure to improve basic services, fight sectarianism and sideline foreign interference.
They won a total of 54 seats in the 329-seat parliament and, for all of their differences, are united on the positions of non-interference in Iraq’s internal affairs, social justice and the battle against corruption.
“The Communists echo the widely held rejection of the governing system of the past 15 years and stand for a reformist, anti-corruption, anti-apportionment platform,” Fanar Haddad, senior research fellow at Singapore University, said.
“Of course, these are positions, not policies, and it is unclear how these positions can be realised in an actual reform agenda,” Mr Haddad told The National.

Posted by: somebody | Oct 7 2019 20:58 utc | 108

just like Venezuela 2002 and syria 2011
hidden snipers being reported
Reporting Iraq
@TFPOI
Protestors are confirming the use of snipers from buildings, targeting protesters approaching Tahrir Square.
A young man was killed by the use of snipers. Evidence in the form of a photo can be seen.
#iraq #baghdad #save_the_iraqi_people https://twitter.com/TFPOI/status/1180202774996369413

Posted by: brian | Oct 7 2019 21:27 utc | 109

Unknown snipers played a pivotal role throughout the so-called « Arab Spring Revolutions » yet, in spite of reports of their presence in the mainstream media, surprisingly little attention has been paid to to their purpose and role.
The Russian investigative journalist Nikolay Starikov has written a book which discusses the role of unknown snipers in the destabilization of countries targeted for regime change by the United States and its allies. The following article attempts to elucidate some historical examples of this technique with a view to providing a background within which to understand the current cover war on the people of Syria by death squads in the service of Western intelligence.[1]
https://www.globalresearch.ca/unknown-snipers-and-western-backed-regime-change/27904

Posted by: brian | Oct 7 2019 21:32 utc | 110

suggesting they are mercenaries directed by “foreign embassies” (ie US and Saudi Arabia)

@Posted by: somebody | Oct 7 2019 20:58 utc | 108
Are you not forgetting someone?…Amongst “foreign embassies”, I mean…Not to mention that, like the case of nuclear scientists assasinated in Iran widely demonstrated time ago, you do not need an embassy to be able to kill people inside an enemy country…

On September 12, 2002, B. Netanyahu addressed the United States’ House Representatives. Here is a fragment[23] of his speech,
“Yes. Now the question you have is this: This is now a question of not of values. Obviously, we would like to see a regime change, at least I would like to, in Iran, just as I would like to see in Iraq. The question now is a practical question. What is the best place to proceed? It is not a question of whether Iraq’s regime should be taken out, but when should it be taken out. It is not a question of whether you would like to see a regime change in Iran, but how to achieve it….

You seem tov have very well studied all the loopholes where to try to create turmoil in Iraq …Although, taking into account that that Chatham House production was published previously in the Washigton Post, an MSM, organ of US DoS, we would doubt of the veracity of all what that guy says…most probably a well funded stooge comfortably seated in the British countryside, in the line of the infamous guy of the Syrian Observatory of HR, who has never put a feet in Iraq, nor less has any contact amongst PMU militias…..
For to be a troll, as some regulars have insinuated, you enjoy an astonishing freedom to broadcast here…Others, who proved being genuine commenters have not…and we miss them…And you are not even newbie here…I read this site since time ago and I know you since…. ever…
I do not think it is a good idea that you broadcast here all the “analysis” of UK/US imperialists think tanks ( which btw we could go reading if we would want it…) and then go without being challenged…Then, I tried a bit for yesterday, and some sent me to do housekeeping…to then start talking about off topic issues…like nuclear energy….These are others who enjoy wide liberties here….I find it strange…no doubt…as Moqtada´s stare…
Elora is going to bed…

Posted by: Elora Danan | Oct 7 2019 22:07 utc | 111

@28 Jackrabbit
Here is an alternative view to Mandelker’s resignation
By Kevin Barrett:

When the FBI called me up to request an in-person interview—and to warn me I would be arrested if I attended a scholarly conference in Beirut—I told them the person they should be investigating was Sigal Mandelker, the suspected Israeli agent running the US Treasury Department’s sanctions program. Israeli-born dual citizen Mandelker was using her perch at Treasury to persecute loyal, patriotic Americans and deprive them of their rights of free speech and free association. Specifically, she had engineered a witch hunt against Iran-based NGO New Horizon, leading to that organization being spuriously designated as a sanctioned entity, and preventing Americans like me from attending annual New Horizon conferences, including the one held last weekend in Beirut.
I wasn’t the only one to tell the FBI to investigate Mandelker. Former Defense Department official Michael Maloof, ex-State Department diplomat J. Michael Springmann, ex-USAF/NSA translator Scott Rickard, Culture Wars editor E. Michael Jones, and journalist Sander Hicks all offered the same advice.
Did honest FBI agents take our advice? Did the Bureau, tasked with persecuting Mandelker/Israel’s political enemies, start asking too many good questions? Did Mandelker’s perch at Treasury become a proverbial hot seat?
One way or another, it seems that having a born-in-Israel Zionist fanatic running the US sanctions program became a political liability. Yesterday Mandelker “offered her resignation.”
Mandelker (and the Israeli spy network that arranged for her appointment in the first place) should have been arrested, not just fired. But that major housecleaning operation will have to wait till another day.

Posted by: jsb | Oct 9 2019 2:01 utc | 112