Just read the Michael Oren interview.
I must admit I am surprised that someone from the New Yorker, Chotiner, even questions Oren as closely as Chotiner does regarding Oren’s statement that as a New York-born Jew he has the right to live anywhere in Greater Israel—a better right than a Palestinian. And Oren (born Bornstein, in NYC) cites, again, the “tribal” right going back 3,000years, comparing this tribal membership to that of a Siouix Native American. Because I am used to the New Yorker and its editor, David Remnick, being a nest of crypto and not so crypto Zionism. To the extent that I finally canceled by sub. Couldn’t stand to read it anymore.
Obviously this tribal business is the new talking point that is being used by all of these usurpers.
The very strong implication is that this is a genetically determined tribal membership that can be traced back to Judea or wherever 3,000 years ago. Every time someone cites this tribal membership I suggest that they be challenged on a simple basis of DNA testing to prove their contention.
One of the many ironies generated by the Jewish State in Palestine is that Germany supports the JSP and all of the shoddy premises and baggage that go along with it, such as Oren’s BS “tribal” narrative, while denying the right of return and naturalization to children and grandchildren of women who were forcibly expatriated by the Third Reich or who fled for their lives. The Germans do not dare describe themselves as “tribe” defined genetically, yet apparently support the JSP’s right to do so as a premise of their right to exist, annex lands, live wehrever they want, and oppress the Pals.
Oren has the chutzpah to describe the JSP as a “western-style democracy” while maintaining that it is based on tribal identity. A “Western style democracy” cannot be based on a tribal/genetic identity. This guy studied at Princeton?
As long as Jews/Zionists cite a tribal identity as justifying the occupation of Palestine and the oppression of truly indigenous Palestinians, I think we have the right to call out these Jews, and the whole JSP enterprise, for their and its obvious racism.
I realize I am not saying anything terribly original here, but the blather of someone like Oren is so utterly infuriating, not only in its arrogance and shoddy logic, that it makes the hair on the back of my neck rise!

Posted by: Really? | May 12 2019 14:08 utc | 4

@ Passer 2
Your analysis is all wet. US enemies are resisting the fruitless attempt of the US to hold on to world dominance. This includes the top three defying the US, North Korea Iran and Venezuela, plus China and Russia who are shifting Turkey and India over to their side because it is the side that is growing in strength as the US gets weaker with its ineffective military leading the way. The US slide is actually being helped by President Trump and his go-it-alone strategy, which includes the breaking of treaties, and now the US has no strong allies in the world including Europe. The recent US defeats in the Middle East have set the tone, with other countries moving into the vacuum.

Posted by: Don Bacon | May 12 2019 14:39 utc | 6

The US is making Chinese goods more expensive in the US. . .that’ll show China who’s the boss! (heh)

Posted by: Don Bacon | May 12 2019 14:53 utc | 8

Posted by: Really? | May 12, 2019 10:08:56 AM | 4
add:
Germany/Europe have always supported the two state solution.
Netanyahu is pretty isolated if not for Trump. And Trump may not be that much of a help

President Donald Trump made headlines in Washington and in Israel on Thursday by saying that Israel will be able to handle the security challenges created by his decision to withdraw all American forces from Syria, because “we give Israel $4.5 billion a year” in security assistance.

Posted by: somebody | May 12 2019 15:03 utc | 10

China’s Banks Are Running Out of Dollars
https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-banks-are-running-out-of-dollars-11556012442
Kyle Bass, Bannon Urge Trump to ‘Play Hardball’ in China Talks
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-25/kyle-bass-steve-bannon
Kyle Bass: China is already out of money
https://www.businessinsider.com/kyle-bass-china-does-not-have-enough-money-2016-2
Hong Kong a ticking financial time bomb? A thrilling story, but don’t buy what Kyle Bass is selling
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3008816/hong-kong-ticking-financial-time-bomb-thrilling-story-dont-buy

Posted by: John Smith | May 12 2019 15:12 utc | 12

Don Bacon it is your analysis that is all wet.
Passer by is simply speaking a truth which you are dissembling in your comment not refuting.
Besides, fact: we already live in a multipolar world. What US, Russia and China are doing is competing against each other largely to gain market share for their products and secure resources to produce ever more products.
What they are doing more and more is cooperating politically and militarily, tying down the global capitalistic enterprise amongst themselves and their vassal states to ensure the growth and safety of assets of their respective home grown oligarchs who are calling the political shots by financing the politicos. They are doing this by increasingly making a sham of the peoples’ rights though disinformation and misdirection, scapegoating and lying.
Nationalism is for the impoverished white “populists” who have been beaten down by capitalism. Globalism is for the “capitalists” who remain firmly in control.
The political leaders of US, Russia and China are globalists.
Also, you are dissembling at 6 when you say “The US is making Chinese goods more expensive in the US. . .”
No, this is not “the US”. This purely Trump through executive order. The majority of the US and Congress are against Trump’s tariff wars.

Posted by: donkeytale | May 12 2019 15:23 utc | 14

@Somebody #5
“You cannot use genetics to decide who is a “tribe”, never mind “nation”, and who is not. ”
I am not making this argument.
Surely it is obvious from my comment that this is not my theory!!
What I am saying is that those who make such an argument should be obliged to prove it. It is in essence a biological/scientific argument, so prove it, already. Otherwise STFU.
DNA testing has AFAIK shown no genetic connection between Ashkenazi Jews and inhabitants of Palestine 3,000 years ago.
This “tribal” argument is as nutty as the one whereby Native Americans are thought to be the Lost Tribes of Israel. So, it is nuttily odd that Oren makes a comparison of Jews qua “tribe” and the Sioux qua “tribe.” Next time maybe Chotiner should ask him whether he has a position on this—it might justify the takeover of the USA govt by Zionists! But somehow I get the feeling that there won’t be a “next time,’ for Chotiner. Maybe for David “Ziophile” Remnick.

Posted by: Really? | May 12 2019 15:44 utc | 16

donkey is here to obfuscate again.
*China, Russia no different from fukus*
Iraq, Libya,Syria, Yemen, Iran, Venezuela…
def of psychopath
those who knowingly , brazenly spout bald faced lies.
You pass the psychopath test again,.

Posted by: denk | May 12 2019 16:09 utc | 18

There are official reports from UAE stating that four tankers have been sabotaged
near the UAE port of Fujairah.
Is it the beginning of a false flag?

Posted by: Carl D | May 12 2019 16:19 utc | 20

@ donkeytale 15
There will soon enough be a tariff-ending deal between Trump and China. China needs a deal to keep its export machine humming along.
No it doesn’t. Why should China care what price its goods are sold for in WalMart? Besides, it is a misconception that China’s economy is dependent on exports. While it is a huge exporter, China’s net exports (exports minus imports) accounted for only about 2% of its total GDP in 2017. Meanwhile China’s economy is growng at more than 6%, making it the fastest growing major economy in the world. Compare to US at 3% and EU at 1%. Besides, any tariff-ending deal would require China to change its growth model under its Plan 2025, which it won’t do because it is so successful.

Posted by: Don Bacon | May 12 2019 16:31 utc | 22

passerby 2
What if the world’s citizens boycott unitedsnake
products. ?
NO takers ?
People are addicted to starbucks, KFC, MAcdonalds, HOlywood, porns…..
perhaps people are even addicted to merkkan B.S.
hehehehhehe

Posted by: denk | May 12 2019 16:37 utc | 24

Don Bacon
I believe you are intelligent enough to discern the minour differences in our statements. Apparently, you can’t or won’t counter argue mine since all you do is throw a wet wash cloth over them.
“The emergence of multipolarity” doesn’t necesssarily imply multipolarity is non-existent. At worst PB believes multipolarity is, uhm, emergent while I believe it already exists.
The Bush/Cheney neocon Iraqi war misadventure of 2003 was the last gasp for America’s self-delusional belief in unipolarity and the outcome and aftermath of that war proved the existence of multipolarity.

Posted by: donkeytale | May 12 2019 16:40 utc | 26

@ dt 26
Okay, that comment mostly makes sense.

Posted by: Don Bacon | May 12 2019 17:00 utc | 28

Multi-polar / and USA hegemony, full spectrum dominance cannot coexist. These are opposite concepts.
Multi-polar is happening. USA dominance is slipping away in spite of the fat ass con man, the walrus and the other fat ass con man. The USA has never rescinded “Full Spectrum Dominance”. This continues to be the primary objective and the guiding principle of US Foreign Policy.
Any foreign government which had not prepared alternatives after having seen and heard that insane declaration in 1997, will find themselves in a bad way.

Posted by: Kristan hinton | May 12 2019 17:10 utc | 30

Don Bacon 31
YOu miss the quotation mark.
Thats donkey’s ass shit.
heheheh

Posted by: denk | May 12 2019 17:21 utc | 32

The demise of the united states won’t be brought about from the out side, but from within! No one here has even suggested this obvious certainty.
Hate ultimately destroys it selve. ‘Babylon will fall.’
We have recently witnessed the end of the dis-united kingdom. Ha ha I’m glad.
But clearly the academics here didi’nt notice !
Well the same is about to happen in the u s . It’s natures way.
Haveing said that I do feel that Russia and China should be funding more opposition party’s and political subversives. both in us and uk .
We love our two country’s and for that very reason, we hate what our country’s have now become . And the degenerates running our countrys

Posted by: Mark2 | May 12 2019 17:34 utc | 34

Funny how Guaidó is quoted as saying that he reserves the right to invite foreign military intervention “in the same way independence hero Simon Bolivar hired 5,000 British mercenaries”. IMO, if the United States is stupid enough to invade Venezuela, they will come up against many José Antonio Páez‘s, one of the outstanding guerrilla leaders in nineteenth century Latin America:
In early June 1821, the 6,500 men republican army was divided and organized in three divisions. The 1st division, made up of 2,500 men, was under Páez’s command and formed by two battalions: Bravos de Apure (Apure Braves) and Cazadores Britanicos (British Hunters or as more often translated to English, the British Legions) and seven cavalry regiments.
By 20 June, all three republican divisions converge from different directions in the plain of Carabobo. With the royalists well entrenched in the center and the south, on the morning of 21 June, Páez was given command of an additional cavalry regiment and ordered to take it together with his own division through the hills on the north side and into the plain and to engage the Spanish, while the 2nd division would stay behind Páez and the 3rd would remain in a defensive position waiting to engage the enemy in the center.
On seeing Páez’s men move, the Spanish commander, Miguel de la Torre, orders one of his elite battalions, the Burgos, to reinforce and defend the north flank. Initially, the Spanish so fiercely engage the Bravos de Apure battalion that it had to fall back on two occasions. Páez sent his Cazadores Britanicos to help the Bravos and together they fought back the Spanish, now reinforced themselves by two additional battalions. As the fighting intensified, de la Torre sent more troops to the north. Páez then sent his cavalry further north to outflank the Spanish and come down on the plain from behind. At this moment, the battle is obviously going against the Spanish, who in desperation kept sending reinforcements. In the meantime, Páez’s men were gaining terrain and closing on falling Spanish from all sides. Some of the Spanish battalions supposed to join and reinforce the engagement in the north, on seeing how their comrades are faring, decide to disobey orders and retreat. As it becomes evident that the republicans were winning the battle, the other divisions moved forward, but by now the bulk of the work had already been done by Páez and his men.
With the Battle of Carabobo, the military fate of the Spanish army in Venezuela was sealed. The victory was carried by Páez. Bolívar promoted him on site to General in Chief of the republican army.
In the battle, the Spanish lost over 65% of their men; the survivors took refuge in the castle of Puerto Cabello. Until it was taken by Páez and his men in 1823, this was the last Spanish stronghold in Venezuela territory.

Posted by: Maracatu | May 12 2019 17:50 utc | 36

@James 23
The establishment is just as terrified about Farage as it is about Corbyn. Just for differing reasons. Farage represents the desire to brexit (something they are desperate to avoid). Corbyn represents socialism.
I can see Farage being let in before Corbyn, partially as no one is threatening a coup against Farage.
Could be argued that the upcoming EU votes are the mother of all protest votes. Tories (usually in 1st place) are polling in fourth…

Posted by: Some Random Passer-by | May 12 2019 18:05 utc | 38

Don Bacon thanks for cherry picking my comment into the least arguable part. At least it is something we can chew on besides a damp wash rag.
@ donkeytale 15
There will soon enough be a tariff-ending deal between Trump and China. China needs a deal to keep its export machine humming along.
No it doesn’t. Why should China care what price its goods are sold for in WalMart? Besides, it is a misconception that China’s economy is dependent on exports. While it is a huge exporter, China’s net exports (exports minus imports) accounted for only about 2% of its total GDP in 2017.
Good points but your macroeconomic analysis is way too simplistic for an economy as complex and unique as China’s. Trump’s tariffs are moronic and the Great Orange DealMaker has no leverage but there will be a deal soon enough anyway.
First, you apparently ignore or don’t fully comprehend the role of globalism in the Chinese economy. Globalism was the main point of my comment to which you took narrow, nationalistic exception on the tariff deal part.

China does a lot of manufacturing for foreign businesses, including U.S. companies. They ship raw materials to China. Factory workers build the final products and ship them back to the United States. In this way, a lot of China’s so-called “exports” are technically American products.

Here’s another factor, the number of Chinese workers employed by small-midsize employers who drive job growth, profit growth and stock prices…all of intense value to China’s political leaders, bosses and shareholders, AKA “globalists.”

But some sectors in China are likely to feel the impact of US tariffs more than others.
The brunt of any negative impact is likely to be felt by small and medium-sized enterprises that export to the US or that make goods for export, analysts say.
These types of firms account for about 70 percent of all jobs in the country, says Andrew Collier, managing director of Orient Capital Research, an independent macroeconomic research firm.
The Chinese economy may also be hurt if tariffs drive manufacturers out of China towards South Korea, Thailand, Indonesia or Vietnam.

Now, you can argue the Chinese can simply sell their goods elsewhere or produce more for internal consumption and easily move on down the highway. That is a great point if it works out that way…akin to the argument that the US and Russia could simply shut down their military arms manufacturing sectors and easily redirect to production of different goods/services to benefit their people and the world. This is obviously true in the abstract but how easily and how long will it take to make this massive macroeconomic transition?
A long time and with a great deal of localised workforce pain in the interim. China will make a deal. Probably a great one for them too, given the buffoon they are dealing with…lol
We can get into an argument about how much of China’s domestic economy consists of overvalued, over-leveraged assets such as real estate (sound familiar?) or how the inevitable evolution of China into a mature, then late stage capitalist service economy will somehow miraculously lead to a more just and equitable world for the 99.9% but that’s for another day.

Posted by: donkeytale | May 12 2019 18:20 utc | 40

@31 Don Bacon
“What US, Russia and China are doing is competing against each other largely to gain market share for their products and secure resources to produce ever more products.
Not Russia, with a GDP equal to Texas.”
Russia is the only non-Middle East country besides the US with both vast oil and gas resources and the ability to destroy the United States in 30 minutes. They punch above their weight.

Posted by: Schmoe | May 12 2019 18:26 utc | 42

“Just Me” lol.
Let’s keep it simple. Sure. You are a fascist. That does explain the fact you say nothing.

Posted by: donkeytale | May 12 2019 18:30 utc | 44

Saad bin Khalid Al Jabry.. is this going to be the new kashoggi? or will clown prince take a different approach..

Posted by: james | May 12 2019 18:37 utc | 46

denk last line, rof.. that’s funny!

Posted by: james | May 12 2019 18:38 utc | 48

I just love it when analysts like passerby are able to so glibly extend a smooth sailing history of the world forward in time some 30 years with just the ordinary death mayhem and destruction of business as usual, species extinction, and so forth, and no unintended cataclysm!
I guess this view is supported by the history of the world so far!
I can only picture this coming week, and it looks murky to me, some bad weather, and so forth possible. Plus oh joy I won’t likely be around 30 years from now to experience this brave new world unless the pharmaceutical and tech companies meld my soul into a machine!

Posted by: Geoff | May 12 2019 18:41 utc | 50

james 48
b once took a break of few years, during which
I suffered withdrawal syndrome.
Also I dont advocate b to start a ‘boycott unitedsnake’ campaign here.
I suspect it’d provoke tptb to shut down this site, if not the internet, in a jiffy.
hehehe

Posted by: denk | May 12 2019 18:48 utc | 52

@51 Guiado could be looking for a way out. I guess if Moustache and Pomp don’t ride to the rescue he will be able to blame them for the coup fiasco.

Posted by: dh | May 12 2019 18:54 utc | 54

This looks to be a UAE news site.
https://www.khaleejtimes.com/news/government/4-ships-subjected-to-sabotage-operations-near-uae-waters
“Four commercial cargo ships were subjected to sabotage operations today, 12th May, near UAE territorial waters in the Gulf of Oman, east of Fujairah, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, MOFAIC, has announced.”
“The MOFAIC statement said that the carrying out acts of sabotage on commercial and civilian vessels and threatening the safety and lives of those on board is a serious development. It called on the international community to assume its responsibilities to prevent such actions by parties attempting to undermine maritime traffic safety and security.”

Posted by: Peter AU 1 | May 12 2019 18:59 utc | 56

Posted by: Really? | May 12, 2019 11:44:06 AM | 16
Oren does not say genetics, it is you who added this to the argument.
Sioux don’t have citizenship in the US via genetics as I understand but territory – Canadian Sioux are Canadians, right?
To argue to an American – where citizenship derives from being born on the territory – on the basis of Israeli zionist ideas (actually this right to the tribal land is not even zionism, Herzl wanted a Jewish state wherever and discussed Argentinia as well as Palestine) is completely demented and shows how isolated and desperate they are. Oren probably realised it and that is why he stopped the interview.
The West Bank has a Palestinian population of close to 3 million, on Israeli territory close to 2 million, and similar numbers in Gaza.
They don’t seem to have counted for quite some time and that is for a reason.
With the same right of return for Palestinians that Oren claims for Jewish Israelis that’s it – Israel’s Jewish majority is gone, spelling out the end of zionism. And without the right of return for Jews whereever they are the zionist dream is over, too. Israel will be just a normal state.

Posted by: somebody | May 12 2019 19:59 utc | 58

There are official reports from UAE stating that four tankers have been sabotaged near the UAE port of Fujairah.
Is it the beginning of a false flag? Posted by: Carl D | May 12, 2019 12:19:02 PM | 20
yes, a link was provided as well as the list of ships involved @ snake @ 3
interesting nothing else heard about this anywhere?
Posted by: snake | May 12, 2019 1:50:03 PM | 35
When it wasn’t mentioned by CGTN, NHK, DW or ABC.au, I Googled it and found several denials sprinkled among the vaguely sourced stories.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | May 12 2019 20:04 utc | 60

Passer @2
I am of the opinion that many historical processes tend to unfold more slowly than people expect as well. It is difficult to affix a date to the end of the Roman Empire, for instance, because it happened over a long period of time.
That said, the urgency that I am seeing that suggests a very near-term crisis is not so much coming from the “alternative media” as it is from the corporate mass media (Operation Mockingbird” mass media) and the actions of the Empire of Chaos itself. For example, why the urgency to regime change Venezuela? It is not as if Americans really care at all about the people of Venezuela, and there is no impending shortages of oil on the radar, what with the US still coasting on the increase in output from the fracking boom, so why is the Empire doing the full court press on Venezuela? If socialist governments always self destruct then why not just sit back and wait? Why all of the coup attempts and cyber attacks and sabotage and subterfuge? That stuff is just burning any credibility America has left. Why the manic trade war against China? Why not take the necessary time to negotiate properly? What is so different now from a decade ago that America needs a deal right away?
No, it isn’t the “alternative media” that is misreading the situation, rather it is the establishment and its corporate media that seems to be in a panic at the moment, and that is what I find curious. They are in a manic rush for aggression in all directions and there is really no obvious rational explanation for it. This suggests to me that the elites see fragility in their rule that is not being advertised. My guess is that the petrodollar is in a far more precarious state than appearances would suggest.

Posted by: William Gruff | May 12 2019 20:24 utc | 62

donkeytale @40
Your understanding of where China is at right now and where they are headed is comically flawed. There will be no “deal”, at least not the one the US is demanding. The Chinese will offer another “deal” to Trump that he can save face with, but it will not include stopping China’s climb to the top of the value-added ladder, or handing their banks over to Goldman-Sachs, or any of the other points that the US is claiming are show-stoppers. Even if the US throws 25% tariffs on everything China exports to the US it will only knock a point, maybe a point and a half off of the growth of China’s GDP for a short while, but their GDP will continue to grow. Meanwhile those tariffs will absolutely throw America’s economic growth into negative territory.
There will be no “deal”. There is no benefit to one for China considering what America’s demands are.

Posted by: William Gruff | May 12 2019 20:50 utc | 64

#62 – “why the urgency to regime change Venezuela?”
Regime change in Venezuela has been an ongoing project for twenty years now. The Guaido events of these past months has been in the works since the summer of 2017, and has included the formation of the Lima Group and the organized boycott of last year’s election. Understanding that it is Lopez who is actually the designated next leader, not Guaido, dates the current efforts as beginning 2013/14.
Canada’s national broadcaster featured a story last week on the “beloved” Lopez. The continued insistence that Lopez/Guaido have overwhelming popularity in Venezuela (as opposed to Florida) is delusional yet continues to be reported as fact.
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/venezuela-s-would-be-presidents-alien-the-school-play-women-s-football-stalkerware-after-parkland-more-1.5116896/venezuela-already-has-two-presidents-now-leopoldo-lópez-is-back-in-the-mix-too-1.5116900

Posted by: jayc | May 12 2019 21:03 utc | 66

jayc @66
I have no disagreement with what you wrote, but the point remains that the US began rushing events this year instead of giving their plots and schemes time to mature. The chances of sparking an uprising in Venezuela is now close to 0% because the empire exposed itself to the Venezuelan people. The regime change plans for Venezuela have realistically been set back a couple years at this point.
The Empire of Chaos is acting desperate for some reason.

Posted by: William Gruff | May 12 2019 21:12 utc | 68

The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS):
European NATO states must invest an extra $300 billion to defend Eastern Europe without the US
Defending Europe: scenario-based capability requirements for NATO’s European members

Posted by: John Smith | May 12 2019 21:23 utc | 70

recent study
Estimated Impacts of Tariffs on the U.S. Economy and Workers
Conclusion

By any measure, the imposition of tariffs by the United States and U.S. imports of steel, aluminum, motor vehicles and parts, some subset of products imported from China –or all of them is a net loss for the U.S. economy and U.S. workers. An examination of all the ways in which such tariffs, accompanied by retaliation by U.S. trading partners, affects purchasing and hiring decisions demonstrates that on balance U.S. farmers, manufacturers, services providers and their workers experience greater losses thangains. In some instances, the tariff actions erase all of the anticipated gains from tax reform. . .here

Posted by: Don Bacon | May 12 2019 21:44 utc | 72

Nobody assigning blame for the ship bombings as yet. What’s going on.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-egypt-emirates/egypt-condemns-actions-against-four-ships-near-uae-territorial-waters-idUSKCN1SI0NZ?il=0
“Egypt’s foreign ministry on Sunday condemned what the United Arab Emirates called an act of sabotage against four ships near the UAE’s territorial waters and said it stood by that country.
In a statement, the ministry said it “condemned all acts that would harm the national security of the UAE” and “stressed the solidarity of the Egyptian government and people with the UAE in confronting all the challenges it may face.””

Posted by: Peter AU 1 | May 12 2019 21:48 utc | 74

The passerby drive-by trill post would be more credible if the reality of the Soviet collapse would have been discussed. More specifically, that no one on either the Soviet or US (or European, China) side had any idea it was about to happen.
As it is, we do have some very clear problems which loony to the US situation as anything but rosy. I. Particular, a US deficit of $21t – which is 20%-25% of the world’s GDP and growing at $1t+ a year with no turnaround in sight.
Yes, this is all dollars which can be printed etc to be repaid, but the consequence of doing so is a huge deferment in trust in the US, ita financial institutions, the dollar, etc.
The switch of the US from a massive trade deficit nation to one forced into austerity will be interesting.
The reality is also that the growing deficit is not being financed by the rest of the world anymore, meaning my description of the debt as a problem is shared at government level. Net foreign holdings of US debt has been basically flat since 2012 – this is a long period of time.

Posted by: C1ue | May 12 2019 21:57 utc | 76

And I would add to Kh’s list the fact that the left generally is not predisposed to out and out violence. The right appears to have no qualms whatsoever with vicious violence.

Posted by: arby | May 12 2019 22:00 utc | 78

#68 – ” the US began rushing events this year instead of giving their plots and schemes time to mature.”
I don’t wish too cut too fine a line on this, but events were timed to Marduro’s inauguration, which was the trigger for the constitutional interpretation invoked by Guaido. Planning for this specific scheme went back at least to the previous September. It would include putting Guaido in position to assume/claim executive power and lining up international support. The gambit was announced ahead of time by the Lima Group at a press conference in early January.
The ensuing panic and sense of urgency is a result of events not unfolding as planned, as it appears the schemers somehow believed there would be limited resistance to Guaido assuming the presidency. It appears that members of the Lima Group were misled as to popular support for the opposition, and may also have be led on as to support within the Venezuelan military.

Posted by: jayc | May 12 2019 22:26 utc | 80

Trump’s Trade War is Already Over

“Let’s shift gears now and talk about what’s really going on.
Trump’s team would be fine with a trade deficit if China was still recycling that trade surplus into US Treasury bonds. They aren’t. The Chinese have held their stock of US debt between $1.1 and $1.25 trillion for two years now.
They are sending a lot of those dollars back out into the world to fund their massive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). They are also using them to power swap arrangements with countries feeling the bite of Trump’s sanctions. Countries like Turkey, Pakistan and Iran, for examples.”

Strategic Culture

Posted by: Bemildred | May 12 2019 23:11 utc | 82

On the question in 60 thru 74.. what the urgency in corporate media.. <= a problem unfolding in front of their eyes. Even war or bailout cannot get them out of failure this time, I think, no matter what the fake data says, small and consumer based business in America is declining rapidly, everywhere.. and in UK as well. I do not know how many lives in America are dependent upon government subsidy but my guess is over 50% of Americans need government help. 2ndly most Americans are very dissatisfied with the corruption in the government no matter the party or the person. and no one believes either the news or any of the politicians <= this is new since Bush. Obama was elected on the change ticket. 3rdly, Fracking is failing, its destroying the environment and LNG min. market price is too high to save the energy sectors; not only is there a global glut of oil, but there is strong ever growing Solar and Wind energy technology encroaching into the traditional oil based energy markets. the engines that use energy are using less to accomplish the purposes they were designed to do and robots are coming into every day.. so business needs to do what computers do, that is, keep getting more powerful and smaller. 4th opportunity is every where declining college grads are in high demand, but soon they need retraining and most looking for a new job are not finding that life long job instead they are accepting lower pay jobs or they are taking jobs with government. The monopoly powered corporate monsters are raising their prices by reducing the quantities of the goods in the packages. inflation has been hidden at the dinner plate for now. The immigration from the South of Mexico is increasing and many, many corporations and persons depend on that labor for survival. I do not believe the economic problems are going away until the USA allows Americans to tool back up their industries and that will take years because the talent to design, build and operate those industries have disappeared into the fakeary of the MIC. .. Pharmaceutical prices and hospital stays are rising in price and medical activities have become the only major non retail business left in America; its nearly 100% supported by government subsidy one way or another.. HUD is paying the rent for a very large, every growing number of persons in affordable housing. On the streets in nearly every town you see a proliferation of restaurants and other businesses of the types that people start from their own savings after all else has failed. So this means fewer customers to buy the products that monopoly power (copyrights and patent dependent corporations) sell even before the impact of the Tariffs.. All is not well.. the local banks are marking time, as no one wants to borrow with war on the horizon. The last bit of savings has been spent, the well is dry.. I see this condition all along the East Coast, and in Washington State. I have not recently been to middle America.. ? Unless Americans discover how to get around the copyrights and patents and privatized governmental resources that prevent them from competing, and unless the growing government backs off on regulatory control, especially in housing, competition in businesses will not exist meaning "America at its center" is, IMO, going to burst into oblivion . Unlike Trump, I do not see the problem to be goods and services coming into America.. I see that the USA was used by the monopoly powered global corporations to deny American businesses and to be sure these businesses lost the know-how to compete. America must be able to competitively produce its own goods and services but it cannot IMO. To be sure there is a major difference between the USA and the average American, neither knows or respects the other. The problem is not with the foreign competition, but instead the problem is "there are no competitors on the American team" and those who control the USA do not want Americans to compete. The competitors are not in the global corporations nor are they in national corporations, the true ingenuity is in home town America. Further, copyrights, patents and privatization have denied that ingenuity for so long it can no longer perform. The education system has been rendered virtually useless, the local banking system corrupted and made into an international weapon, the stock markets has been supported only by invasion into foreign places by war, regime change and corruption so what is left for Americans is nothing like what it used to be.. Capitalism is a very good system, but it depends for its success on an honest referee(the government). Unfortunately those in power used the government to make the rules so only their favored few could win, everyone else was made a customer spectator. Now the monopoly game is nearly over, and one guy owns all of the property so each roll of the dice brings the game closer to being over. At least, this is my opinion

Posted by: snake | May 12 2019 23:14 utc | 84

@ Schmoe 83
) Fracking is not going a well as advertised and if so, that will be a big problem and we need to steal someone else’s oil to make up for it.
You were smart in adding the “if so” because fracking is going well. I recently drove through the Permian region of Texas and it’s gangbusters, lots of people and lots of equipment everywhere, and many “mancamps” (mostly RVs) to house the workers.

Posted by: Don Bacon | May 12 2019 23:36 utc | 86

@Don Bacon #86 –
I am from that part of Texas and it’s a perpetual boom-bust-boom-bust economy that is dependent on the price of mainly oil, but also to some extent LNG, which often sits on top of the oil deposits (not in the types of deposits exploited by fracking though I don’t think). In any case, if there is a war involving Iran or Venezuela, oil prices will continue to rise and they’ll do just fine out in the Basin, but if prices drop, it becomes too expensive to pull oil from the Earth in that manner.
Speaking of – I have been told by colleagues that it’s indeed booming right now – the burrito guy got rich over the past 4 years by putting his unlicensed, unpermitted trailer wherever these mancamps or fracking sites are and charging $5 for what I hear is a pretty good burrito. Also saw a story in the Wall Street Journal of all places about how a barber can get rich out there. Thing is the mancamps are there because it’s 1) a transient workforce (same guys were in the Dakotas not long ago and 2) as the result of the boom, housing prices are through the roof (and it’s not a very nice place to live, in my educated opinion, so that’s saying something).
Here’s that story: https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-this-oil-boom-town-even-a-barber-can-make-180-000-11551436210
Looks like other barbers are following the burrito man’s lead: https://www.oaoa.com/community/article_2c26df84-d157-11e7-b8bd-477a07df567a.html
Sorry for the links, but I’m posting from a phone and it’s not easy doing the HTML stuff from here.

Posted by: KC | May 13 2019 0:00 utc | 88

Gruff: “The Empire of Chaos is acting desperate for some reason.”
Is it possible that this is all being driven by the thre psychopaths—Pompeo, Bolton, Abrams—who want a war fast? And not driven by those in charge (whoever they are, if not PBA) being desperate to make overwrought moves to head off something worse that they are aware of?

Posted by: Really? | May 13 2019 0:06 utc | 90

@ 86 Don Bacon

Posted by: Schmoe | May 13 2019 0:12 utc | 92

@ KC 88
Thanks for that on the Texas fracking scene, I think we might have seen the burrito man’s trailer. My wife and I were knocked over by the whole scene, which she calls unbelievable, and we imagine (as you suggest) it’s like other boom town events (but more than one town, and probably longer lasting) and suggestive of the old western gold rush days (in one’s imagination). It was surely a vast sight to behold of tons of equipment and hundreds people, driving northwest from Midland. . .sign: $400 per week (to live in a small trailer).

Posted by: Don Bacon | May 13 2019 0:20 utc | 94

#89 – Really?
I asked them the same thing up-thread. I doubt we’ll get an answer…sounds like more made up CIA propaganda from the Cold War. I’m sure that the Soviets were indeed playing up any economic issues in the west during that time, but I would doubt very seriously most people believed the US was on the verge of financial collapse (which we’re a hair’s breadth away from at the present) – not to mention nuclear war, which I’d bet we’re also much closer to now than at many times during the Cold War.

Posted by: KC | May 13 2019 0:44 utc | 96

KC | May 12, 2019 8:44:19 PM | 96
Communism was teaching that capitalism would collapse and that it was “scientifically proven”, no idea if people believed that.

Posted by: T | May 13 2019 0:54 utc | 98

re Collapse and the soviet union. There was an old ‘Radek’ joke to this effect:
Cde A “I have a new job. I sit in a tall watchtower on the western border of the USSR. When capitalism collapses I have to inform Moscow.
Cde B “Sounds good. What is the money like?”
Cde A “Oh, the pay is terrible but the great thing is that the position is permanent.”
The point being, of course, that after years of false alarms and promises of the imminent fruits of victory people had grown very cynical about the long promised collapse of capitalism.

Posted by: bevin | May 13 2019 1:01 utc | 100