Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 8, 2018
Trump Ends The Nuclear Deal With Iran – What’s Next?

With a very belligerent speech Trump nixed the nuclear deal with Iran. He also lied a lot in it. Neither is a surprise. The United States only keeps agreements as long as they are to its short term advantage – just ask native Americans. One can never count on the U.S. to keep its word.

Trump will reimpose U.S. sanctions on Iran because:

  • The nuclear deal was negotiated by the Obama administration and thus must be bad;
  • Israel wants to keep Iran as the boogeyman;
  • the Zionists and right wing nuts in the U.S. want the U.S. to attack Iran;
  • MAGA – Trump needs Iran as enemy of the Gulf states to sell more U.S. weapons.

Three European countries, Britain, France and Germany, were naive enough to think they could prevent this. The EU3 offered the U.S. to put additional sanctions on Iran for other pretended reason – ballistic missiles and the Iranian engagement in Syria. I was disgusted when I first read of the plan. It was obvious from the beginning that it  would only discredit these countries AND fail.

Luckily Italy and some eastern European countries shot the effort down at the EU level. They were not willing to sacrifice their credibility over the issue. The nuclear agreement was signed and should be followed by all sides. They pointed out that there was no guarantee from Trump that any additional European effort would change his view.

Over the last weeks some last EU3 attempts to influence Trump were made. They were in vain:

On Friday, Pompeo organized a conference call with his three European counterparts. Sources who were briefed on the call told me Pompeo thanked the E3 for the efforts they had made since January to come up with a formula that will convince Trump not to pull out of the nuclear deal — but made it clear the President wants to take a different direction.

After Trump's statement, the European powers want to issue a joint statement which will make it clear they are staying in the Iran deal in an attempt to prevent its collapse.

The sanctions Trump will reintroduce are not just limiting U.S. dealings with Iran, but will also penalize other countries. That will lead to a flurry of protective measures as at least some of those other countries will limit their exposure to U.S. rules and may even introduce counter sanctions:

“We are working on plans to protect the interests of European companies” Maja Kocijancic, EU spokeswoman for foreign affairs, told reporters in Brussel.

Iran will largely stick to the nuclear deal if the EU effectively defends it and does not hinder Iranian deals with European companies. If the EU fails to do so the nuclear agreement will be null and void. Iran will leave the deal. The neoliberal Rouhani government that agreed to the deal will fall and the conservatives will be back. They will defend Iran's sovereignty at all costs.

The U.S. seems to believe it can go back to the same position Obama had build up in the years before the nuclear deal. Iran was under UN sanctions and all countries, including China and Russia, held them up. The Iranian economy was in serious trouble. It needed to negotiate a way out. That situation will not come back.

U.S. credibility has been seriously damaged. Its soft power is gone. Its hard power has shown to be inadequate in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.

China and Russia are both making huge deals with Iran and are now effectively its protectors. While they have no common ideology all three oppose a globalized world under exclusive "western" rules. They have the economic power, the population and resources to do so. Neither the U.S. nor Europe has come to terms with that.

Iran has not only new allies but gained in the Middle East because of U.S., Israeli and Saudi stupidity. The wars on Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen have all strengthened Iran's position while it largely kept largely out of them. The recent election in Lebanon went well for the 'resistance' camp. Within Lebanon Hizbullah can no longer be challenged. The upcoming elections in Iraq will result in another Iran-friendly government. The Syrian army is winning the war waged against the country. The U.S. position in Afghanistan is hopeless. Saudi Arabia is now in a fight with the UAE over the war on Yemen. The GCC spat with Qatar is still unsolved.

While Israel wants to keep Iran as a boogeyman to divert attention from its genocidal campaign against Palestinians, it does not want a large war. Hizbullah in Lebanon has enough missiles to make modern life in Israel untenable. A war on Iran could easily end up with Tel Aviv in flames.

There are some people in the Trump administration who will want to wage war on Iran. The Bush administration also had such plans. But any war gaming of a campaign against Iran ended badly for the U.S. and its allied states. The Gulf countries are extremely vulnerable. Their oil output could be shut down within days. That situation has not changed. The U.S. is now in a worse strategic position than it was after the invasion of Iraq. As long as somewhat sane people lead the Pentagon they will urge the White House not to launch such an endeavor.

The U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal is a huge mistake. Defense Secretary Mattis spoke against it. Will Trump make an even bigger mistake despite the opinion of his military advisors? Will he wage war on Iran?

Comments

With a modicom of temerity I propose the following: what if Trump’s shocking rant is merely the bluster of failed leadership foreseen- not with respect to Iran but quite specifically towards the two Koreas. Trump does not want to go down in history as the president who withdrew troops from the dmz.

Posted by: juliania | May 10 2018 10:57 utc | 301

…so he deliberately casts doubt on his own ability to abide by any agreement, and this is the best way to do that.
Irreconcilable vs. Reconcilable. Troops stay. It will be interesting to see how Korea responds.

Posted by: juliania | May 10 2018 11:02 utc | 302

juliania @303:
I would wager that Korea will reunify but the US base and personnel will get surprised attacks, or at the very least violent protests, waged against them.

Posted by: Ian | May 10 2018 13:14 utc | 303

Posted by: abierno | May 9, 2018 11:25:28 AM | 214
“In this global economy, companies will simply move off shore, and denominate their sales in euros, yuan or rubles as is already happening. ”
Have you studied the previous Iran sanctions? No, bypassing dollars was not enough to help Iran.
——
However, my conclusion is that Europeans have no other intelligent option by defend themselves aggresively, i.e. with retaliatory tariffs. After all, this is the only thing that EU does much better than individual states, this is in their institutional genes. Companies affected by hostile actions of US government could supply claims to an European office, and approved claims would be paid out of money collected from the extra tariffs. And of course there would be a ricochet effect, so there is reluctance to do it.
But zealous American officials ALWAYS can find a shell company that makes business with a major European company and slap multi-billion dollar fine. Trying to comply with American whims is no protection against the mindset that USA should collect tribute from the ingrates basking under American protective umbrella while “not doing enough”.
By the way of contrast, counter-tariffs will raise whining among American companies and may lead to rather prompt settlement. After all, in trade EU is not inferior to USA.
The remaining option is to follow advise “if you cannot avoid rape, lean back and try to enjoy it”.

Posted by: Piotr Berman | May 10 2018 18:55 utc | 304

Can ANYONE show me a signed executed copy of the agreement?

Posted by: sam | May 11 2018 18:05 utc | 305

@Piotr Berman
Are you seriously saying that aparthaeid genocidal zionist regime is the same as iran?!
And that ethnical cleansing of protesting Palestinians is the same as a nonexistentials shooting of protesters in Iran?
Posted by: Ikl | May 9, 2018 9:13:41 PM | 288
I only wrote that rough outline of the political system in Iran and Israel has a large similarity, namely that we can observe electoral bodies controlling some functions of the government, and basically unelected religious bodies being responsible for other functions. The position of military is hard to compare, because in Iran, de iure it is supervised by (basically) unelected Supreme Leader, and in Israel, militarism is de facto part of the religion, so it is an institution loosely supervised by the elected government that is dominated by former military officers.
Thus one cannot declare superiority of Israel as “sharing our values”, unless we are theocrats at heart, and if we are, Iran shares our values as well. Once we remove that, we have to assess liberties and repressions in each state, and indeed, Israel is more lethal. I would quibble that the tag “apartheid” fits Israel (they even use a Hebrew word with the same meaning), but “genocide” is a hyperbole. If you want to convince friends, family members etc. I would stick to “dispossession and bloody repressions”.

Posted by: Piotr Berman | May 13 2018 15:36 utc | 306

Good Germans are at the wits end and the mood seems rebellious. Because of posted linked I stumbled upon an editorial in Der Spiegel. This magazine was at the pinnacle of the established media — my knowledge may be obsolete, but the text is a prime example of masochistic European mentality. Two quotes:
Sometimes I feel like a motherless child It is impossible to overstate what Trump has dismantled in the last 16 months. Europe has lost its protective power. It has lost its guarantor of joint values. And it has lost the global political influence that it was only able to exert because the U.S. stood by its side.
Get up, stand up, stand up for your rights Europe should begin preparing for a post-Trump America and seek to avoid provoking Washington until then.

Posted by: Piotr Berman | May 13 2018 15:46 utc | 307

Piotr’s quote “Sometimes I Feel Like A Motherless Child” seemed an ideal segue to post this link to an amazing 16 minute tribute on Paul Robeson’s 120th Birthday.
Paul Robeson’s politics may have cost him his life and career
by RT’s Anya Parampil

Posted by: Daniel | May 13 2018 21:20 utc | 308

Posted on the Open Thread also, but most relevant to this discussion of Trump/Russia:
All day Sunday, May 13, RT has been showing a report on the Gaza protests presented by Israeli “journalist,” Yael Shir.
Amongst other hasbara, she claims Palestinians “threw grenades at IDF soldiers.” “riots have been escalating” “kites as weapons” and “flames across the border.” “IDF has responded with tear gas.” Not one word about IOF snipers.
This “journalist” has a pretty thin online presence.
I find her Twitter account was created in December, 2016, and has a grand total of 4 Tweets (nothing news related):
https://twitter.com/yaelshir
This seems to be her Facebook, though it says she lives in New York. Still, all of her “friends” appear to share ethnicity and many write in Hebrew.
https://www.facebook.com/yael.shir.9
Her “news anchor” identity seems to come solely from an internet “show” that extends all the way back to 2 months ago! Total of 11 “shows.”
I can find no news articles written by her, or really anything else at all. Is she even a thing?
BTW: “Yael” is Ivanka Trump/Kushner’s chosen Jewish name. She and hubby are in Israel today to be the official White House representatives at the opening of the US Embassy in Jerusalem (which is actually just the renaming of some offices they have had there for years).

Posted by: Daniel | May 14 2018 0:24 utc | 309