Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 21, 2018

The Media War On Truthful Reporting And Legitimate Opinions - A Documentary

Early in life I have noticed that no event is ever correctly reported in a newspaper, but in Spain, for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie. I saw great battles reported where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed. I saw troops who had fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had never seen a shot fired hailed as the heroes of imaginary victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that had never happened. I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but of what ought to have happened according to various ‘party lines’.
George Orwell, Looking back on the Spanish War, Chapter 4

Last week saw an extreme intensifying of the warmongers' campaign against individuals who publicly hold and defend a different view than the powers-that-be want to promote. The campaign has a longer history but recently turned personal. It now endangers the life and livelihood of real people.

In fall 2016 a smear campaign was launched against 200 websites which did not confirm to NATO propaganda. Prominent sites like Naked Capitalism were among them as well as this site:

This website,, is now listed as "Russian propaganda outlet" by some neoconned, NATO aligned, anonymous "Friendly Neighborhood Propaganda Identification Serviceprominently promoted by today's Washington Post. The minions running that censorship list also watch over our "Russian propaganda" Twitter account @MoonofA.

While the ProPornOT campaign was against websites the next and larger attack was a general defaming of specific content.

The neoconservative Alliance For Securing Democracy declared that any doubt of the veracity of U.S. propaganda stories discussed on Twitter was part of a "Russian influence campaign". Their 'dashboard' shows the most prominent hashtags and themes tweeted and retweeted by some 600 hand-selected but undisclosed accounts. (I have reason to believe that @MoonofA is among them.) The dashboard gave rise to an endless line of main-stream stories faking concern over alleged "Russian influence". The New York Times published several such stories including this recent one:

Russia did not respond militarily to the Friday strike, but American officials noted a sharp spike in Russian online activity around the time it was launched.

A snapshot on Friday night recorded a 2,000 percent increase in Russian troll activity overall, according to Tyler Q. Houlton, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security. One known Russian bot, #SyriaStrikes, had a 4,443 percent increase in activity while another, #Damsucs, saw a 2,800 percent jump, Mr. Houlton said.

A person on Twitter, or a bot, is tagged by a chosen name led with an @-sign. Anything led with a #-sign is a 'hashtag', a categorizing attribute of a place, text or tweet. Hashtags have nothing to do with any "troll activity". The use of the attribute or hashtag #syriastrike increased dramatically when a U.S. strike on Syria happened. Duh. A lot of people remarked on the strikes and used the hashtag #syriastrike to categorize their remarks. It made it easier for others to find information about the incident.

The hashtag #Damsucs does not exit. How could it have a 2,800% increase?  It is obviously a mistyping of #Damascus or someone may have used as a joke. In June 2013 an Associated Press story famously carried the dateline "Damsucs". The city was then under artillery attack from various Takfiri groups. The author likely felt that the situation sucked.


The spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security Tyler Q. Holton, to which the Times attributes the "bot" nonsense, has a Twitter account under his name and also tweets as @SpoxDHS. Peter Baker, the NYT author, has some 150,000 followers on Twitter and tweets several times per day. Holton and Tyler surely know what @accounts and #hashtags are.

One suspects that Holton used the bizzare statistic of the infamous 'Dashboard' created by the neoconservative, anti-Russian lobby. The dashboard creators asserted that the use of certain hashtags is a sign of 'Russian bots'. On December 25 the dashboard showed that Russian trolls and bots made extensive use of the hashtag #MerryChristmas to undermine America's moral.


One of the creators of the dashboard, Clint Watts, has since confessed that it is mere bullshit:

“I’m not convinced on this bot thing,” said Watts, the cofounder of a project that is widely cited as the main, if not only, source of information on Russian bots. He also called the narrative “overdone.”

As government spokesperson Holton is supposed to spout propaganda that supports the government's policies. But propaganda is ineffective when it does not adhere to basic realities. Holton is bad at his job. Baker, the NYT author, did even worse. He repeated the government's propaganda bullshit without pointing out and explaining that it obviously did not make any sense. He  used it to further his own opinionated, false narrative. It took a day for the Times to issue a paritial correction of the fact free tale.

With the situation in Syria developing in favor of the Syrian people, with dubious government claims around the Skripal affair in Salisbury and the recent faked 'chemical attack' in Douma the campaign against dissenting reports and opinions became more and more personal.

Last December the Guardian commissioned a hatchet job against Vanessa Beeley and Eva Bartlett. Beeley and Bartlett extensively reported (vid) from the ground in Syria on the British propaganda racket "White Helmets". The Guardian piece defended the 'heros' of the White Helmets and insinuated that both journalists were Russian paid stooges.

In March the self proclaimed whistle-blower and blowhard Sibel Edmonds of Newsbud launched a lunatic broadside smear attack (vid) against Vanessa Beeley and Eva Bartlett. The Corbett Report debunked (vid) the nonsense. (The debunking received 59,000 views. Edmonds public wanking was seen by less than 23,000 people.)

Some time ago the CIA propaganda outlets Voice of America and Radio Free Europe started a 'fact-checking' website and named it (Some satirist or a clueless intern must have come up with that name. No country but the U.S. believes that the unscientific results of polygraph tests have any relation to truthfulness. To any educated non-U.S. citizen the first association with the term 'polygraph' is the term 'fake'.)

On April 4 the Polygraph wrote a smear piece about the Twitter account Ian56 (@Ian56789). Its headline: Disinfo News: Doing the Kremlin’s Work: A Fake Twitter Troll Pushes Many Opinions:

Ben Nimmo, the Senior Fellow for Information Defense at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, studies the exploits of “Ian56” and similar accounts on Twitter. His recent article in the online publication Medium profiles such fake pro-Kremlin accounts and demonstrates how they operate.

Nimmo, and several other dimwits quoted in the piece, came to the conclusion that Ian56 is a Kremlin paid troll, not a real person. Next to Ian56 Nimmo 'identified' other 'Russian troll' accounts:

Ben Nimmo @benimmo - 10:50 UTC - 24 Mar 2018

One particularly influential retweeter (judging by the number of accounts which then retweeted it) was @ValLisitsa, which posts in English and Russian. Last year, this account joined the troll-factory #StopMorganLie campaign.

Nimmo's employer, the Atlantic Council, is a lobby of companies who profit from war.

Had Nimmo, a former NATO spokesperson, had some decent education he would have know that @ValLisitsa, aka Valentina Lisitsa, is a famous American-Ukrainian pianist. Yes, she sometimes tweets in Russian language to her many fans in Russia and the Ukraine. Is that now a crime? The videos of her world wide performances on Youtube have more than 170 million views. It is absurd to claim that she is a 'Russian troll' and to insinuate that she is taking Kremlin money to push 'Russian troll' opinions.

Earlier this month Newsweek also targeted the journalists Beeley and Bartlett and smeared a group of people who had traveled to Syria as 'Assad's pawns'.

On April 14 Murdoch's London Times took personal aim at the members of a group of British academics who assembled to scientificly investigate dubious claims against Syria. Their first investigation report though, was about the Skripal incident in Salisbury. The London Times also targeted Bartlett and Beeley. The piece was leading on page one with the headline: "Apologists for Assad working in universities". A page two splash and an editorial complemented the full fledged attack on the livelihood of the scientists.


Tim Hayward, who initiated the academic group, published a (too) mild response.

On April 18 the NPR station Wabenews smeared the black activists Anoa Changa and Eugene Puryear for appearing on a Russian TV station. It was the begin of an ongoing, well concerted campaign launched with at least seven prominent smear pieces issued on a single day against the opposition to a wider war on Syria.

On April 19 the BBC took aim at Sarah Abdallah, a Twitter account with over 130,000 followers that takes a generally pro Syrian government stand. The piece also attacked Vanessa Beeley and defended the 'White Helmets':

In addition to pictures of herself, Sarah Abdallah tweets constant pro-Russia and pro-Assad messages, with a dollop of retweeting mostly aimed at attacking Barack Obama, other US Democrats and Saudi Arabia.
The Sarah Abdallah account is, according to a recent study by the online research firm Graphika, one of the most influential social media accounts in the online conversation about Syria, and specifically in pushing misinformation about a 2017 chemical weapons attack and the Syria Civil Defence, whose rescue workers are widely known as the "White Helmets".
Graphika was commissioned to prepare a report on online chatter by The Syria Campaign, a UK-based advocacy group organisation which campaigns for a democratic future for Syria and supports the White Helmets.

The Syria Campaign Ltd. is a for profit 'regime change' lobby which, like the White Helmets it promotes, is sponsored with millions of British and U.S. taxpayer money.

Brian Whitaker, a former Middle East editor for the Guardian, alleged that Sarah Abdullah has a 'Hizbullah connection'. He assumes that from two terms she used which point to a southern Lebanese heritage. But south Lebanon is by far not solely Hizbullah and Sarah Abdallah certainly does not dress herself like a pious Shia. She is more likely a Maronite or secular whatever. Exposing here as 'Hizbullah' can easily endanger her life.  Replying to Whitaker the British politician George Galloway asked:

George Galloway @georgegalloway - 14:50 UTC - Replying to @Brian_Whit

Will you be content when she’s dead Brian?
Will you be content Brian when ISIS cut off her head and eat her heart? You are beneath contempt. Even for a former Guardian man

Whitaker's smear piece was not even researched by himself. He plagiarized it, without naming his source, from Joumana Gebara, a CentCom approved Social Media Advisor to parts of the Syrian 'opposition'. Whitaker is prone to fall for scams like the 'White Helmets'. Back in mid 2011 he promoted the "Gay Girl in Damascus", a scam by a 40 year old U.S. man with dubious financial sources who pretended to be a progressive Syrian woman.

Also on April 19 the Guardian stenographed a British government smear against two other prominent Twitter accounts:

Russia used trolls and bots to unleash disinformation on to social media in the wake of the Salisbury poisoning, according to fresh Whitehall analysis. Government sources said experts had uncovered an increase of up to 4,000% in the spread of propaganda from Russia-based accounts since the attack, – many of which were identifiable as automated bots.

Notice that this idiotic % increase claim, without giving a base number, is similar to the one made in the New York Times piece quoted above. It is likely also based on the lunatic 'dashboard'.

[C]ivil servants identified a sharp increase in the flow of fake news after the Salisbury poisoning, which continued in the runup to the airstrikes on Syria.

One bot, @Ian56789, was sending 100 posts a day during a 12-day period from 7 April, and reached 23 million users, before the account was suspended. It focused on claims that the chemical weapons attack on Douma had been falsified, using the hashtag #falseflag. Another, @Partisangirl, reached 61 million users with 2,300 posts over the same 12-day period.

The prime minister discussed the matter at a security briefing with fellow Commonwealth leaders Malcolm Turnbull, Jacinda Ardern and Justin Trudeau earlier this week. They were briefed by experts from GCHQ and the National Cyber Security Centre about the security situation in the aftermath of the Syrian airstrikes.

The political editor of the Guardian, Heather Steward, admitted that her 'reporting' was a mere copy of government claims:

Heather Stewart @GuardianHeather - 10:38 UTC - 20 Apr 2018

It's not my analysis - as the piece makes quite clear - it's the government's.

The government claim was also picked up by other British outlets like Sky News (vid).


A day earlier Ian56/@Ian56789 account with 35,000 followers had suddenly been blocked by Twitter. Ben Nimmo was extremely happy about this success. But after many users protested to the Twitter censors the account was revived.

Neither Ian, nor Partisangirl, are 'bots' or have anything to do with Russia. Partisangirl, aka Syria Girl, is the twitter moniker of Maram Susli, a Syrian-Australian scientist specialized in quantum chemistry. She was already interviewed on Australian TV (vid) four years ago and has been back since. She has published videos of herself talking about Syria on Youtube and on Twitter and held presentations on Syria at several international conferences. Her account is marked as 'verified' by Twitter. Any cursory search would have shown that she is a real person.

The claim of bots and the numbers of their tweets the government gave to the Guardian and Sky News are evidently false. With just a few clicks the Guardian and Sky News 'journalists' could have debunked the British government claims. But these stenograhers do not even try and just run with whatever nonsense the government claims. Sky News even manipulated the picture of Partisangirl's Twitter homepage in the video and screenshot above. The original shows Maram Susli speaking about Syrian refugees at a conference in Germany. The picture provides that she is evidently a living person and not a 'bot'. But Sky News did not dare to show that. It would have debunked the government's claim.


After some negative feed back on social media Sky News contacted the 'Russian bot' Ian and invited him to a live interview (vid). Ian Shilling, a wakeful British pensioner, managed to deliver a few zingers against the government and Sky News. He also published a written response:

I have been campaigning against the Neocons and the Neocon Wars since January 2002, when I first realised Dick Cheney and the PNAC crowd were going to use 9/11 as the pretext to launch a disastrous invasion of Iraq. This has nothing to do with Russia. It has EVERYTHING to do with the massive lies constantly told by the UK & US governments about their illegal Wars of Aggression.

Brian Whitaker could not hold back. Within the 156,000 tweets Ian wrote over seven years Whitaker found one(!) with a murky theory (not a denial) about the Holocaust. He alleged that Ian believes in 'conspiracy theories'. Whitaker then linked to and discussed one Conspirador Norteño who peddles 'Russian bots' conspiracy theories. Presumably Whitaker did not get the consp-irony of doing such.

On the same day as the other reports the British version of the Huffington Post joined the Times in its earlier smear against British academics, accusing Professor Hayward and Professor Piers Robinson of "whitewashing war crimes". They have done no such thing. Vanessa Beeley was additionally attacked.

Also on the 19th the London Times aimed at another target. Citizen Halo, a well known Finnish grandma, was declared to be a 'Russian troll' based on Ben Nimmo's pseudo-scientific trash, for not believing in the Skripal tale and the faked 'chemical attack' in Syria. The Times doubted her nationality and existence by using quotes around her as a "Finnish activist".

Meanwhile the defense editor of the Times, Deborah Haynes, is stalking Valentina Lisitsa on Twitter. A fresh smear-piece against the pianist is surely in the works.

The obviously organized campaign against critical thinking in Britain extended beyond the Atlantic. While the BBC, Guardian, HuffPo, Times and Sky News published smear pieces depicting dissenting people as  'Russian bots', the Intercept pushed a piece by Mehdi Hasan bashing an amorphous 'left' for rejecting a U.S. war on Syria: Dear Bashar al-Assad Apologists: Your Hero Is a War Criminal Even If He Didn’t Gas Syrians.

Mehdi Hasan is of course eminently qualified to write such a piece. Until recently he worked for Al Jazeerah, the media outlet of the Wahhabi dictatorship of Qatar which supports the Qatari sponsored al-Qaeda in its war against Syria. The Mehdi Hasan's piece repeats every false and debunked claim that has been raised against the Syrian government as evidence for the Syrian president's viciousness. Naturally many of the links he provides point back to Al Jazeerah's propaganda. A few years ago Mehdi Hasan tried to get a job with the conservative British tabloid Daily Mail. The Mail did not want him. During a later TV discussion Hasan slammed the Daily Mail for its reporting and conservative editorial position. The paper responded by publishing his old job application. In it Mehdi Hasan emphasized his own conservative believes:

I am also attracted by the Mail's social conservatism on issues like marriage, the family, abortion and teenage pregnancies.

A conservative war-on-Syria promoter is bashing an anonymous 'left' which he falsely accuses of supporting Assad when it takes a stand against imperial wars. Is that a 'progressive' Muslim Brotherhood position? (Added: Stephen Gowans and Kurt Nimmo respond to Hasan's screed.)

On the same day Sonali Kolhatkar at Truthdig, as pseudo-progressive as the Intercept, published a quite similar piece: Why Are Some on the Left Falling for Fake News on Syria?. She bashes the 'left' - without citing any example - for not falling for the recent scam of the 'chemical attack' in Douma and for distrusting the U.S./UK government paid White Helmets. The comments against the piece are lively.

Those working in the media are up in arms over alleged fake news and they lament the loss of paying readership. But they have only themselves to blame. They are the biggest creators of fake news and provider of government falsehood. Their attacks on critical readers and commentators are despicable.

Until two years ago Hala Jabar was foreign correspondent in the Middle East for the Sunday Times. After fourteen years with the paper and winning six awards for her work she was 'made redundant' for her objective reporting on Syria. She remarks on the recent media push against truth about Syria and the very personal attacks against non-conformist opinions:

Hala Jaber @HalaJaber - 18:36 UTC - 19 Apr 2018

In my entire career, spanning more than three decades of professional journalism, I have never seen MSM resolve to such ugly smear campaigns & hit pieces against those questioning mainstream narratives, with a different view point, as I have seen on Syria, recently.

.2/ This is a dangerous manoeuvre , a witch hunt in fact, aimed not only at character assassination, but at attempting to silence those who think differently or even sway from mainstream & state narrative.

.3/ It would have been more productive, to actually question the reason why more & more people are indeed turning to alternative voices for information & news, than to dish out ad hominem smears aimed at intimidating by labelling alternative voices as conspirators or apologists.

.4/ The journalists, activists, professors & citizens under attack are presenting an alternative view point. Surely, people are entitled to hear those and are intelligent enough to make their own judgments.

.5/ Or is there an assumption, (patronizing, if so), that the tens of thousands of people collectively following these alternative voices are too dumb & unintelligent to reach their own conclusions by sifting through the mass information being dished at them daily from all sides?

.6/ Like it or hate it, agree or disagree with them, the bottom line is that the people under attack do present an alternative view point. Least we forget, no one has a monopoly on truth. Are all those currently launching this witch hunt suggesting they do?

The governments and media would like to handle the war on Syria like they handled the war in Spain. They want reports without "any relation to the facts". The media want to "retail the lies" and eager propagandists want to "build emotional superstructures over events that never happened."

The new communication networks allow everyone to follow the war on Syria as diligently as George Orwell followed the war in Spain in which he took part. We no longer have to travel to see the differences of what really happens and what gets reported in the main stream press. We can debunk false government claims with freely available knowledge.

The governments, media and their stenographers would love to go back to the old times when they were not plagued by reports and tweets from Eva, Vanessa, Ian, Maram and Sarah or by blogposts like this one. The vicious campaign against any dissenting report or opinion is a sorry attempt to go back in time and to again gain the monopoly on 'truth'.

It is on us to not let them succeed.

Posted by b on April 21, 2018 at 23:02 UTC | Permalink

« previous page

Is something going on with your website or is someone messing with it? I clicked on it a few times last week and got an error that said you were doing mantainece on it. Just checking..

Posted by: Rons | Apr 23 2018 18:26 utc | 101

@ 81 & 82 - thank you for your replies.

"I found that you subtly try to whitewash the terrorist and their supporters,"

Not so What I am saying is that accuracy is sacrosanct, as far as one can get at it, whatever our views.

If we refuse to admit that there are crimes on one side then we are less credible when we say there are crimes on the other. Above, "b" details the extraordinary effort being put into giving us a false picture of the Syrian conflict. That effort includes discrediting those who set out the true picture. Any mistake, however small, made in setting out that true picture is seized upon and used to discredit the whole.

You are right in pointing out that my comment does imply that Syrians (and the Novorossians for that matter) committed atrocities on the same scale as the Jihadists and the neo-nazis. I see that I should have written it more carefully. But I have read the MOA comments section several times recently and it seems to me that there are none here who do not know the truth on that.

I don't think I'm being optimistic in thinking that the truth is slowly getting out to the general public as well. This is a video, linked to on SST just now, that compels conviction and that, if anything, understates the horrors to which the people of Syria have been subjected.

I've been emailing this to people who might be reluctant to wade through pages of detail but who might find themselves able to spend a few minutes to get a general overview. I don't see why the BBC, or CNN for that matter, should have it all their own way.

On that case of that British soldier I am conflicted. I can see that those who judged him could come to no other verdict. You and I could come to no other verdict were we in their place. And it would be quite wrong to send out any other than that message to serving officers and men who might find themselves in a similar position.

But ... I could wish, improper and impracticable though I have no doubt that wish is, that the case could have been dealt with otherwise.

Posted by: English Outsider | Apr 23 2018 19:08 utc | 102

Ahhh... here it comes. I was wondering what took them so long. The Neocon Mafia started a rather obvious campaign at the end of last year using trolls to salt the alt-narrative sites with virulent anti-Semitic comments. Those are be used in future efforts to take down the sites, 'proving' they endorse hate speech. For now, BBC's Dalati rolls out the anti-Semite canard for the Beeley attack. [bolding below is mine for emphasis]

Riam Dalati Verified account @Dalatrm

Replying to @Sankara522 @Tim_Hayward_ and 2 others

On the other spectrum [sic], you have @VanessaBeeley filmed and pictured sharing platform with anti-Semites, Holocaust deniers and Neo-Nazis. Picture perfect.

3:10 PM - 19 Apr 2018

The core 'intellectual thinkers' ushering in the neoconservative left in the 60's were all ardent Zionists that saw the defense of Israel as an eternal moral obligation of the US. The neocon's pro-war stance was an extension of the "defense of US interests anytime, anywhere" R2P fascism. Israel's security and impunity, guaranteed by US political and military backing, were unarguably in the interests of the US. The Israeli-firster neocons found plenty of like-minded thinkers in Israeli-firster Republican right. When the deep state (or foreign policy borg) loses control of the Israeli-firster narrative, they will always revert to accusations of anti-Semitism.

Dissenters of neocon doctrine on the internet will be singled out and personally attacked, and will be further subject to all manner of anti-Semitic McCarthyism. It's already started.

Posted by: PavewayIV | Apr 23 2018 19:19 utc | 103

Question for PavewayIV: Which in your opinion is the most virulent anti-Semitic nation: USA or Israel?

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 23 2018 19:32 utc | 104

Russiagate’s next target: John Bolton?

Is President Donald Trump’s new national security adviser John Bolton a secret Russian stooge? NBC news thinks he might be along with neocon propagandist Ben Nimmo

Posted by: Anon | Apr 23 2018 19:38 utc | 105

did you see

Posted by: jsb | Apr 23 2018 19:50 utc | 106

Sorry for my previous comment that was cut off...


You be interested in this:

I believe this Conspirador Norteño is tied to the PropOrNot infamous site. First of all, Conspirador Norteño joined twitter in July 2016, and PropOrNot joined twitter in August 2016...coincidence, perhaps; but there is more...

If you look at the twitter feeds they cite each other's tweets in complementary terms:
look here. Moreover they retweet each other's messages. But if one takes a look at the content that each of them tweets one cannot help but think that these two are tied somehow:

and here their work trying tie MoA
,amongst others, as a fake news propaganda site. More here:

Posted by: jsb | Apr 23 2018 20:26 utc | 107

karlof1@105 - 'anti-Semitic' is way too nebulous of a term for any possible rational discourse. There are good people in Israel - they just don't run the place. Second- and third-generation Israeli immigrants don't care to argue about internal or external enemies. They dump that extra baggage when they leave Israel for a more human-friendly destinations including the US. It doesn't matter what skewed polls or government statistics say. If your young people see no future in your country and permanently leave in great numbers, then your country just sucks, period. Who is responsible for the attitude of those young people? It doesn't matter - nothing is going to change except the continuous atrophy of your nation. Nobody wants to be on Team Hate.

Posted by: PavewayIV | Apr 23 2018 22:22 utc | 108

PavewayIV @109--

Agree about it being "way too nebulous of a term," for "rational discourse;" so, might one conclude that the term's use is irrational or is used by those thus afflicted? I'm rather surprised you describe the USA as being "human-friendly" after all the millions killed, maimed, displaced, and deprived of a meaningful existence, with more planned to become that way via policy.

"Nobody wants to be on Team Hate." Guess that's why so much energy and wealth is spent on trying to make people believe they're on Team Benevolent>.

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 23 2018 22:42 utc | 109

Thank you for your valiant piece, B.! "Virtue is bold, and goodness never fearful."-- Measure for Measure, III.i

Posted by: verax | Apr 23 2018 23:37 utc | 110

Most of the democrats I speak to believe the media’s narrative on Syria, Russia, Douma and the Skiripals. They also buy that every view that challenges their spoon fed MSM narrative is the work of conspiracists, crazies and Russian spies despite their own extreme ignorance regarding all of the above. Trying to get them to see alternative views is like trying to deprogram a long term cult member.

Republicans are not much better in general.

I sure hope my experiences are not representative of the US in general or we are in deep trouble.

Posted by: Alaric | Apr 24 2018 1:33 utc | 111

@112 alaric, i bet they are indicative of the general usa public, sorry to say!

Posted by: james | Apr 24 2018 1:42 utc | 112

Right on, Ort.

Posted by: Sid2 | Apr 24 2018 1:52 utc | 113

Below are screen grabs from two different reports of gas attacks in Syria made approximately 1 year apart, and about separate gas attacks on different cities. Compare the appearance of the kids in the pics. Open each link in a separate browser window (not in separate tabs). Position the browser windows side by side.

NOTE the following:
(1) The approximate age of the children is the same, their relative sizes are the same (the boy is slightly taller than the girl)
(2) Their sexes are the same,
(3) Hair color is the same, hair style and length is the same (see the part of the girl's hair)
(4) Facial appearance and characteristics are the same, -(A)see the pronounced cleft of the girl's chin, which is evident in both photos, -(B)see the light scar marking the girl's left cheek in the first photo, which can be seen in the second photo if you look closely. These features may not be apparent in the posted screen grab, but are clearly visible when you have the video paused in your maximized browser window.
(5) Positional relation to each other (side by side, girl in front) is the same.
Note the dates of the two articles (the date for the video is in the CNN link which appears below).

Coincidence? Or is it possible that the same two children were featured in news reports or videos about two different Syrian gas attacks on different cities approximately one year apart?

Below are directions for how to obtain the screen grabs yourself in your own browser:
Open your browser and go to Haaretz:

Article title: "Syria Chemical Attack Approved by Highest Levels of Assad Regime, Israel Believes"
By Amos Harel, Apr 06, 2017 9:01 AM

Look at the 2nd photo in the article, which features a young boy and girl sitting on a bench who appear to be brother and sister. They are in the middle in the photo. Note the details of their appearance.

Now open a new window (not a tab) and go to CNN:

Article title: "Syrian attacks escalate tensions among global powers"
By "Syrian Civil Defense White Helmets" / AP 04/09/2018

As soon as the video loads and starts playing, pause the video. Go to your player settings, and set the playback speed to .25 (slowest possible). This improves your ability to pause the video instantly without undesired "run-on". Then resume playback. Watch for the young boy and girl, who will appear again as brother and sister near the start of the video, around 11 seconds into the 1:59 minute video. By the way, the segment featuring them is over by the 15 second mark. Pause the video when you have a good clear frame. "Un-maximize" the two browser windows and set them so the windows with images from the video and the photo are side by side. Look at the images. Play the video back and forth for detail to compare to the still photo. Now consider the statistical likelihood of similarities between the two, as mentioned above.

Coincidence? Or is it possible that the same two children were featured in news reports or videos about two different Syrian gas attacks on different cities approximately one year apart?

Let me know what you think.

Posted by: Kiev500 | Apr 24 2018 3:00 utc | 114


What you are describing is not only US but westerners in general which really show what an impact the never-ending propaganda in the media have on the viewer.

Posted by: Anon | Apr 24 2018 8:08 utc | 115

112/116 No, they lost the information war. That's why they are suddenly tryind to delegitimize sources of alternative opinion.

This here is probably the most influencial media figure in Germany via the Jerusalem Post.

Döpfner said one frequently hears on the streets and in offices more criticism of US President Donald Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Theresa May for their bombing of military sites and airports in Syria than they do of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. The US, Britain and France accused Assad of using poison gas in April that murdered scores of Syrian in the city of Douma.

Posted by: somebody | Apr 24 2018 10:21 utc | 116

An excellent article, thank you.

Posted by: Jonesy | Apr 24 2018 15:14 utc | 117

@115 kiev5000.. it would seem like more then a coincidence.. there parents are a part of the full time white helmet staff is my guess.. they are used in the propaganda videos used to vilify assad...

Posted by: james | Apr 24 2018 15:53 utc | 118


Since information war ,or so called, is on-going, there is no losers/winners and as we saw after Syrian strike, the western states media stood behind the bombings 100% so they are definately not "losing" in any sense.

Posted by: Anon | Apr 24 2018 16:08 utc | 119

‘Expert on Russian disinformation’ Ben Nummo exposed for spreading disinformation about Twitter users

Posted by: Anon | Apr 24 2018 17:53 utc | 120

Orwell was a propaganda asset of British intelligence. He definitely collaborated with them to some degree and he made it his lifelong mission to demonize and smear the Soviet Union while cozying up to the British and American governments. How could any real leftist do that? Orwell smeared practically the only country (with a little help form Mexico), the USSR, that actually came to the aid of the Spanish Republic! The US, UK, France and others covertly gave aid to the fascists!

Posted by: Prole Center | Apr 24 2018 20:17 utc | 121

Focused more on UK propmedia, an interesting series by Danny Froberg is starting on AMN. Quite some parallels with what b wrote. I particularly like how he points out the systematic reliance on truth reversal absent proof or logic.

Posted by: fx | Apr 25 2018 22:57 utc | 122

If there is one MofA post that ought to remain active for months and months up ahead, then it's probably this one.

There has been no sleight of hand by the establishment, just a doubling down on the bullshit, accusations, etc etc.

Syria has the potential to rip the mask off the face of the establishment narratives, as well as the fake 'alternatives' (re: Democracy Now!, The Intercept).

Armoured with the truth, never has there been a better time to counter.

Posted by: MadMax2 | Apr 26 2018 7:56 utc | 123

Posted by: Anon | Apr 24, 2018 12:08:28 PM | 120

My point is that this had no influence on surveys and polls - at least not in Europe.

Posted by: somebody | Apr 26 2018 8:08 utc | 124

Speaking of the need for progressives to support Eva Bartlett and Vanessa Beeley, and others, the Kurt Nimmo article linked to includes a positive reference to Newsbud, which Kurt says he's produces content for. Newsbud has attack Eva Bartlett and Vanessa Beeley recently. You can't leave comments on Kurt's blog ADE, or I might have pointed that out. The thing is, It just isn't okay.

Posted by: Arby | Apr 26 2018 9:18 utc | 125


They are activists. There used to be a difference between activists and reporters. According to main stream media there are good activists now who tell the truth and bad activists who lie.
Of course no activist is interested in the truth should it not suit them.

Posted by: somebody | Apr 26 2018 12:06 utc | 126

« previous page

The comments to this entry are closed.