Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 4, 2017
Lebanon – Hariri’s Resignation – The Opening Shot Of The Saudi War On Hizbullah

Update (Nov 5, 3 am): After publishing the piece below the Saudi rulers initiated a "house cleaning" in Saudi Arabia. Many princes and businessmen were arrested. The new development wll be covered in another piece later today.

Four days ago we asked: Is The "Moderate Al-Qaeda" Set To Target Hizbullah?. The implied answer in that piece was "Yes, the war is coming to Lebanon."

Today the Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Al-Hariri resigned with a statement issues from Saudi Arabia on the Saudi Arabian TV station Al Arabia (video). This is the opening shot of the war.

The Saudi-Israeli-U.S. axis will lose this war while Iran and Russia will win from it.

Earlier this week the extremely sectarian Saudi Minister for Gulf Affairs Thamer al-Sabhan had threatened Hizbullah in Lebanon and announced surprises:

Firebrand Saudi State Minister for Gulf Affairs Thamer al-Sabhan on Monday called for “toppling Hizbullah” and promised “astonishing” developments in “the coming days.”

Referring to his Sunday tweet about the Lebanese government, the minister said: “I addressed my tweet to the government because the Party of Satan (Hizbullah) is represented in it and it is a terrorist party. The issue is not about toppling the government but rather that Hizbullah should be toppled.”

“The coming developments will definitely be astonishing,” al-Sabhan added.

While the fighting in Syria and Iraq was ongoing, Lebanon was kept at peace. With the wars ending Lebanon is again the place where proxy fights are carried out. In mid October Joseph Bahout predicted this development:

Regionally, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are now seeking ways to compensate for the loss of Syria as a place where they could defy and bleed Iran. A renewed desire to reverse their regional fortunes could lead them to try regaining a foothold in Lebanon. The Gulf states, Israel, and the United States do not want Iran to reap the benefits of a victory in Syria. If ever they seek to rebalance the regional relationship with Tehran in the Levant, the only place to do so would be Lebanon, despite the many risks that would accompany such an effort.

In such an event, and despite its reticence to jeopardize its Lebanese sanctuary, Hezbollah could have no choice but to accept such a challenge, especially if there is an Israeli component to it.

Lebanese politics are regulated by a complicate agreement. The Sunni camp, financed by the Saudis, holds the position of Prime Minister. The position of the President is held by the Christian former general Michel Aoun. The position of Speaker of the Parliament is held by the leader of the Shia Amal movement Nabih Berri. Two month ago Berri had proposed elections to a new parliament before the end of the year. An election would likely diminish the Sunni position.

Saad Al-Hariri was put into the prime minister position after a long quarrel in Lebanon that had reignited when Saad's father Rafic Hariri, the former PM, was assassinated. Hizbullah was accused of that assassination but an Israeli plot seemed more likely.

The Hariri family made its money as owner of Saudi Oger, a construction company in Saudi Arabia. The Hariris have Saudi passports. Business has gone bad under Hariri junior. In July Saudi Oger closed shop and the former billionaire family is rumored to be bankrupt. The Saudi rulers sponsors them.

Hariri had recently assigned a Lebanese ambassador to Syria. Yesterday Hariri was visited in Beirut by Ali Velayati, a top advisor of the supreme leader Khamenei of Iran. The Saudis did not like either. Thamer's plan was set into motion. They sent a private jet and hauled Hariri to Riyadh. There the Saudi clown prince Mohammad bin Salman gave Hariri his resignation statement (written by Thamer?) to be read by him on Saudi TV.

Irony alert: The Lebanese PM (with a Saudi passport) resigns on order of Saudi Arabia, in Saudi Arabia, on Saudi Arabian TV. In his Saudi written resignation statement (excerpts) he accuses Iran of foreign meddling in Lebanese politics.

(Hariri also suddenly claims that there was an assassination planned against him in Lebanon. This is nonsense. The Lebanese internal security organization says it has no knowledge of such a plot. Hariri needs an excuse to stay away from Lebanon and from the wrath of his followers. Saudi media are trying to create some fantastic story from that assassination claim. But there is nothing evident to back it up.)

The resignation of Hariri is intended to provoke a constitutional crisis in Lebanon and to prevent new parliament elections. The further Saudi plan is likely to evolve around these elements:

  • The Trump administration will announce new sanctions against Hizbullah and against Lebanon in general.
  • The Saudi government will slip some of its al-Qaeda/ISIS proxy fighters from Syria and Iraq into Lebanon (possibly via Turkey by sea). It will finance local Lebanese terror operations.
  • There will be new assassination attempts, terror attacks and general rioting by Sunni extremist elements against Christians and Shia in Lebanon.
  • The U.S. will try to press the Lebanese army into a war against Hizbullah.
  • Israel will try to provoke and divert Hizbullah's attention by new shenanigans at the Lebanese and Syrian border. It will NOT start a war.

The plan is unlikely to succeed:

  • The Lebanese people as a whole have no interest in a new civil war.
  • The Lebanese army will not get involved on any specific side but will try to keep everyone calm.
  • Sanctions against Hizbullah will hit all of Lebanon, including Sunni interests.
  • A new Sunni prime minister will be found and installed, replacing the resigned Saudi puppet.
  • Russian and Iranian economic interests will find a new market in Lebanon. Russian companies will engage in Lebanese gas and oil extraction in the Mediterranean and replace U.S. involvement.

The miscalculated Saudi/U.S./Israeli plan against Hizbullah can be understood as a helpless tantrum after their defeat in Syria and Iraq.

Iraqi troops have, against strong U.S. protest, cleared ISIS from border areas with Syria. Some Iraqi militia have crossed the border and are helping Syrian troops to take the last ISIS controlled settlement of Abu Kamal. This will finally open a direct road from Syria to Iraq and beyond. The U.S. had planned to take Abu Kamal with its Kurdish/Arab proxy forces in the area and to block that line of communication. The Syrian government forces are racing against that. For the fourth day in a row Russian Tu-22M3s long range bombers have supported the fight with large raids flown directly from Russia. Hizbullah re-injected thousands of its fighters. This massive force will overwhelm ISIS defenses. Syria will win the race and the fight.

The Saudi sponsored Islamic State in Iraq and Syria has been suffocated and its existence has ended. Some elements of it will continue as a desert terrorist group – nasty but with little overall effect.

Iraq has regained its national sovereignty. It defeated ISIS, the Kurdish encroachment on Arab territory and all attempts to reignite a civil war. The fighting in Syria against al-Qaeda, as well as Turkish, Israeli and U.S. interference, will continue for another year. But it is very likely that the strong alliance of Syria, Iran, Russia and Hizbullah will win this fight. Syria is damaged but will survive as a whole and independent country.

The now launched war on Hizbullah and thereby Lebanon will likely have a similar outcome.

In their manic attempts to push back against perceived Iranian (and Russian) influence the Saudis and the U.S. have enabled Iran (and Russia) to gain better and more secure standing that they could ever have hoped to achieve otherwise. Why the Saudis think that their new adventure in Lebanon will have a different result is beyond me.

Comments

Saw this on Twitter. Read the whole thread!:

Rania Khalek‏
@RaniaKhalek
Al Jazeera apparently aired nasrallah’s speech, showing Qatar’s big shift. Helps that the speech was anti Saudi

https://twitter.com/RaniaKhalek/status/927215233378201601

Posted by: arbetet | Nov 6 2017 8:14 utc | 101


b, are you fundamentally biased, as a German, to discount how enmeshed the Brits and Europeans are in all this? Aren’t the Europeans selling billions of euros in arms to the Saudis too? How far up Natanyahoo’s ass are the Germans & French? Just asking for a friend.
Posted by: ab initio | Nov 5, 2017 6:49:42 PM | 95

Dumb question.
As a German (I’m guessing) that b has to be careful about blaming Jews for the state of Western Demockracy. AmeriKKKa and the Christian Colonial Western govts are ALL infested with very influential Israel-First Ziocons (influential is spelt I$$$$$$$$$l).
If you get bored with wasting everyone’s time @ MoA posting incurious drivel, look up Walt & Meirsheimer’s report on the influence of the Pro-Israel Lobby on AmeriKKKa and US politics. Then assume that the situation in Europe is worse. It’s OK in Oz and the US to be (what the Holocaust Survivors call) anti-semitic, but in many EU countries it can get you tossed in the slammer for Thought Crimes…

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Nov 6 2017 16:06 utc | 102

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Israel_Lobby_and_U.S._Foreign_Policy

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Nov 6 2017 16:12 utc | 103

Excellent post. Certainly the Russians know all about this and will have their hand ready to play, both in terms of KSA and Bibi. How does that effect the calculations?

Posted by: JC | Nov 6 2017 16:46 utc | 104

james @97 and Hoarsewhisperer @102
Notice who all participate in Blue Flag 2017 air exercises in Israel. Are the Germans, French, Italians, Polish, Greeks and Indians doing this because Donald Trump twisted their arms? That strains credulity. Or is it more likely because they are as joined at the hip with Israel as the US is?
http://www.jewishpress.com/headline/israel-hosts-7-air-force-delegations-in-blue-flag-2017-joint-military-exercise/2017/11/02/
But, b only pisses on the US, and conveniently obscures the role played by his fellow Europeans in all this mess.

Posted by: ab initio | Nov 6 2017 20:50 utc | 105

@105 ab initio.. my impression is the usa is the lead dog in it all. i guess you can put me in the category that thinks finances rules much of what is going on in the world today.. i wouldn’t call myself an ‘economic determinist’ but i do think all the financial institutions and systems built up after WW2 have favoured the usa.. and many in leading positions in the usa, political, financial and industrial have sworn allegiance to israel as i witness it.. the euro folks, along with some others like canada, australia and etc just follow the leader in this system that continues to favour the us$… i am sure b could rag on germany just as easily, but what is the point when all the euro leaders continue to walk in goose step with the usa/israel??

Posted by: james | Nov 6 2017 21:12 utc | 106

We regard this as a declaration of war
Link is in german, from “der Spiegel”, mainstream german propaganda outlet. Just referenced for showing that what the mainstream wants the public to know.

“Wir werden die Regierung des Libanon wegen der Hisbollah-Miliz als eine Regierung betrachten, die Saudi-Arabien den Krieg erklärt”, sagte der Saudi-arabische Golfminister Thamer al-Sabhan
“Because of the hizbullah militia, we’ll regard the lebanese governmet as one who has declared war on saudi arabia”, says saudi gulf-minister (wtf? this is translated literally. guess german propnews get their texts directly from the pentagon or the like, piped through google translator) thamer al-sabhan.
Spot on, my friend. Best journalist around.

Posted by: radiator | Nov 6 2017 22:52 utc | 107

It’s on and declared in the most vicious, dishonest way: Thamer al-Sabhan blames Lebanon (really, all of it) for having declared war on Saudi Arabia.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lebanon-politics/saudi-arabia-says-lebanon-declares-war-against-it-idUSKBN1D61SZ
George Orwell would be proud.

Posted by: fx | Nov 6 2017 23:13 utc | 108

Posted by: ab initio | Nov 6, 2017 3:50:07 PM | 105
(b pisses only on AmeriKKKa)
‘james’ | Nov 6, 2017 4:12:19 PM | 106, response is near enough as an explanation for b’s apparent bias.
Apologies if you found the tone of my #102 unduly harsh.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Nov 7 2017 7:00 utc | 109

I wouldn’t prophesy if I was the author. He certainly is welcome to speculate.

Posted by: Arby | Nov 7 2017 23:00 utc | 110