Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 24, 2017
And Then The Clown Prince Told Friedman: ‘Suck On This.’

The Moustache of Understanding, Thomas Friedman, has written the probably most embarrassing fanfiction ever:

The most significant reform process underway anywhere in the Middle East today is in Saudi Arabia. Yes, you read that right. Though I came here at the start of Saudi winter, I found the country going through its own Arab Spring, Saudi style.

Unlike the other Arab Springs — all of which emerged bottom up and failed miserably, except in Tunisia — this one is led from the top down by the country’s 32-year-old crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, and, if it succeeds, it will not only change the character of Saudi Arabia but the tone and tenor of Islam across the globe.

Friedman once said that U.S. soldiers must shove their guns into the face of random Arabs and tell them to "suck on this".  How things change. Friedman now went to Riyadh to suck on whatever side of his abdomen Mohammed bin Salman shoved into his mustached mouth:

We met at night at his family’s ornate adobe-walled palace in Ouja, north of Riyadh. M.B.S. spoke in English, while his brother, Prince Khalid, the new Saudi ambassador to the U.S., and several senior ministers shared different lamb dishes and spiced the conversation. After nearly four hours together, I surrendered at 1:15 a.m. to M.B.S.’s youth, pointing out that I was exactly twice his age. It’s been a long, long time, though, since any Arab leader wore me out with a fire hose of new ideas about transforming his country.

"Look here! MbS SPEAKS ENGLISH (and pays in dollars)! This must be OUR GUY."

("And don't ya all love those (homo-)sexual allusions I enwombed in those words?")


Tom Friedman (left) being "instructed" of his next fellacious duty (artist conception)

It hasn't been such a "long, long time" since Friedman used that "wore me out" cliche. Only two years exactly, or four Friedman units, have passed since he last fellatiated MbS like this:

I spent an evening with Mohammed bin Salman at his office, and he wore me out.

Friedman's Love Letter to a War Criminal largely ignores the famine in Yemen caused by the U.S.-Saudi blockade of that country. The Saudi tyrant promised to lift the blockade two days ago only to keep it up and to even tighten it since. "A humanitarian nightmare" is all Friedman has to say about it.

But "it blew [his] mind" to learn that "men-only" concerts in Riyadh are now a thing.

Friedman falsely claims that MbS is a "lawyer by training,..". Since when is a Bachelor degree in Islamic law – the only academic training MbS claims to have – sufficient to join a legal bar?

Friedman goes on to repeat the ridiculous claim that the tyrant's brutal shakedown of his local competition is following some rule of law:

When all the data was ready, the public prosecutor, Saud al-Mojib, took action, M.B.S. said, … "Under Saudi law, the public prosecutor is independent. We cannot interfere with his job …"

Those are of course outright lies which Friedman makes no attempt to refute. Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy. What part of "absolute" is so difficult to understand? King Salman's decree gave his son's shakedown committee absolute authority to maim whoever it wants to and to take whatever it likes – literary:

“It may take whatever measures deemed necessary to deal with those involved in public corruption cases and take what it considers to be the right of persons, entities, funds, fixed and movable assets, at home and abroad, …"

There is no "public prosecutor" or "rule of law" involved in that mass rape. Moreover, the kings decree immunizes MbS of any consequences. It exempts his committee "from laws, regulations, instructions, orders and decisions" as long as it claims to perform its tasks.

All is well, Friedman says, because the few people he was allowed to talk to, knew their script well:

Not a single Saudi I spoke to here over three days expressed anything other than effusive support for this anticorruption drive.

No Saudi speaks out against that drive because doing so might get him killed. Anything less than "effusive support" for the clown prince constitutes "terrorism" and gets one jailed or killed in no time:

The law, introduced earlier this month, includes penalties of up to 10 years in jail for insulting the king and crown prince, as well as the death penalty for other acts of "terrorism", according to Saudi Gazette and other local news media.

Friedman. won't go to jail. He pens down whatever the Saudi ruler and his entourage tell him to – or not to write. He says as much:

Indeed, M.B.S. instructed me: "Do not write …"

Thus, Saudi Arabia, which is funding thousands of extremist Wahhabi mosques all around the world, will now become the beacon of liberal Islam. Or so he claims.

The whole piece is a terrible embarrassment for its author, but even more so for the editors at the NY Times, who let it pass. They should demand the pay for a full spread advertisement from the Saudis to compensate for the loss of readership Friedman's column is likely to cause.

One wonders why the mustache felt the need to suck up all the crap MbS offered to him. He is married to a billionaire and does not need the extra income. Then again – some "youth" to "surrender to" and a "fire hose"  to "wore him out" for "a long, long time" might have been an enticing compensation.

Comments

What is wrong with all of you? Trump won last year already and he let Russia crush ISIS. He’ll let them crush HTS as well. The Saudi purge is necessary because those bastards were clearly controlling the US media and half the US politicians. The question b should be writing about is whether Jacob Rothschild was killed 8 days ago in that copter crash.
#Followthewhiterabbit or at least explain why this Q Anon stuff is nonsense. I cannot see even a little bit why it would be bad to arrest the princes who clearly funded terror and 911 and Law Vegas.

Posted by: B Logical | Nov 25 2017 19:22 utc | 101

Saudis are shit scared that their ARAMCO IPO is doomed. An analyst did a hands-on modeling of the company’s valuation and guess what? At 20% discount rate, the company is valued at around $ 400 billion, a far cry from the $ Trillion. So, Saudis need lots and lots of money and they need it fast. The real Arab Spring is coming in few months when all reforms fail and people take to the streets.
https://www.perchingtree.com/saudi-arabia-aramco-insights-ipo/

Posted by: TruthHunter | Nov 25 2017 19:24 utc | 102

Wow.Just was at graun.They have article by Jeffrey h Smith declaring Trump is destroying security agencies.
The ones gave US warnings about 9-11?The Iraq war they gave US shite?

Posted by: dahoit | Nov 25 2017 19:32 utc | 103

It’s not just about the Aramco IPO…which is small potatoes compared to the big story of China eventually forcing Saudis to take yuan instead of dollars…
The global oil trade is $15 trillion a year…that’s not counting gas…that’s a whole lot of ‘free’ greenbacks that the Fed can print…all thanks to the ‘forced’ demand for petrodollars…
That’s the existential question for KSA…China is their biggest buyer…China doesn’t want to prop up USA money printing machine anymore…
Something’s got to give…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Nov 25 2017 20:26 utc | 104

flankerbandit @84
Thanks for describing the Swiss Press Club controversy.
And the “journalists” demanding that Vanessa Beeley be uninvited, Reporters without Boarders (RSF) are of course a US government founded and funded NGO. It was created with US NED seed money, and is part of the George Soros network of disinformation and CHAOS-creating “charities.”
They were exposed as such during their anti-democracy “activism” in Venezuela, way back in 2004.
https://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/1125

Posted by: Daniel | Nov 25 2017 21:50 utc | 105

Les perles de Monsieur Moustaches:
1.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/02/opinion/02friedman.html?smid=tw-share
about Arab Spring
2.Should we be arming ISIS?
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/18/opinion/go-ahead-ruin-my-day.html?
In 2002, we destroyed Iran’s main Sunni foe in Afghanistan (the Taliban regime). In 2003, we destroyed Iran’s main Sunni foe in the Arab world (Saddam Hussein).
He forgot who he asked to suck on it !
3.Yemen’s Arab Spring was a smashing success in 2013, better than even Tunisia.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/12/opinion/sunday/friedman-the-yemeni-way.html
4.War analyst
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/12/opinion/why-is-trump-fighting-isis-in-syria.html
We could simply back off fighting territorial ISIS in Syria and make it entirely a problem for Iran, Russia, Hezbollah and Assad. After all, they’re the ones overextended in Syria, not us. Make them fight a two-front war — the moderate rebels on one side and ISIS on the other.

Posted by: Yul | Nov 25 2017 21:55 utc | 106

@ TruthHunter An interesting valuation and could not find any holes in the ARAMCO model so far. The discount rate is taken as 10%, should be actually 30% given the geopolitical concerns. Quite sure Saudis do not want this information to reach many investors. Most investors are still thinking $ 1.5 Trillion or more. They are deluding themselves.

Posted by: financebuff | Nov 26 2017 2:43 utc | 107

@flankerbandit : Perhaps you are not aware that Chinese Sovereign Wealth fund has refused to invest in ARAMCO for now. The petro-dollar trap is also there but Saudis cannot possibly break away from Petro-dollars without the CIA destabilizing the regime. So, Saudis will maintain the peg and also trade with China in Yuan benchmark. They need a lot of money to keep their feet in two boats. They are scared that their FX reserves are only 20% of what they need. They need foreign investment fast.

Posted by: Truthhunter | Nov 26 2017 2:52 utc | 108

@107 Aramco’s value seems to fluctuate with the Saudi tax rate. That’s what will affect shareholder dividends. Currently most analysts reckon $1.5 trillion based on a 50% tax.

Posted by: dh | Nov 26 2017 2:52 utc | 109

@dh The valuation link using the DCF model is quite accurate as I see it. Even with 50% Tax Rate incorporated into the DCF model, the valuation is not more than 800 billion. The calculation is at 10% discount rate. No one in their right mind will use 10% discount rate for Saudi ARAMCO.

Posted by: Truthhunter | Nov 26 2017 3:04 utc | 110

Does anyone know the identify of the Saudi Whistleblower Twitter Account ? @ Ahdjadid ?
To me it seems that it is the account used by a Western Agency which is snooping on Saudi communications and releasing tit bits about inside working of the palace. No Saudi on the inside would take such a risk in the current environment.

Posted by: DanilB | Nov 26 2017 3:12 utc | 111

@110 Yes but a lot of people expect the Saudis to run out of oil. They may be right. There may be a war in the gulf. An asteroid may hit the planet. Elon Musk may come up with a new battery. Right now the only thing that potential Aramco investors are looking at is dividends. They know Saudis have low production costs and they can adjust the tax rate at will. Hence the $1.5 trillion evaluation.
Personally I wouldn’t touch Aramco with a barge pole.

Posted by: dh | Nov 26 2017 3:20 utc | 112

@ dh @ DanilB I am an investment banker who has spend the first 10 years of my 18 years creating financial models for LBO’s and M&A’s. We recently had a bet amongst our colleagues that anyone who could cross 1 Trillion mark for ARAMCO with inscrutable data from public domain will get a big monetary prize. Guess what, out of the 14 people who participated, only 2 came up with a valuation just north of 1.2 trillion,all the rest were below the 1T line. The 1.2 T valuation fell apart under further scrutiny. Median Valuation was 625 B with 20% discount rate, 50% tax rate and 260 billion barrels of reserves. I am now quite sure that when full financial disclosure is done by ARAMCO, optimistic investors will brace for a shock. I do agree with some who think that the fiscal state of Saudis and the oil reserves are overstated. Saudi Reforms are doomed.

Posted by: financebuff | Nov 26 2017 3:38 utc | 113

@113 I suspect a lot of the analysis is based on current events in Saudi Arabia. The whole place is looking scarey. I can’t see Aramco being worth $1.5 trillion the way things are but some will take the risk. Maybe MSB should hand the IPO over to Waleed.

Posted by: dh | Nov 26 2017 3:45 utc | 114

@114 MbS dammit.

Posted by: dh | Nov 26 2017 3:47 utc | 115

The valuation has only one component, it being the discount rate (r) that is impacted by geopolitical risks. The rest of the inputs are standard and fixed provide input data is correct. I do tend to agree with you that Waleed Talal was probably the best flag bearer for an IPO who is now tainted and probably tired due to his upside down forced acrobatics by Latin American mercenaries.

Posted by: financebuff | Nov 26 2017 3:58 utc | 116

Everyone needs to read this commentary why Saudis will lose big time in a contest against Iran. Very well written piece.
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/saudi-arabias-great-gamble-23348?page=show

Posted by: PartyOver | Nov 26 2017 4:03 utc | 117

@116 Precisely. And geopolitical risks are variable. MsB should stop kidnapping Lebanese politicians and look for a way out of the Yemen mess if he wants to attract investors.

Posted by: dh | Nov 26 2017 4:06 utc | 118

notheonly1@78.
You got it. It takes a great amount of time to understand. I have had to exercise great patience with those who are just catching up. Thanks for your excellent post.
homeroid.

Posted by: homeroid | Nov 26 2017 4:31 utc | 119

Is it not the least tantalizing that when the ever shifting Israeli interests whirl around like the winds-of-change all the Israeli-firsters’ true allegiance stands out in vivid contrast to the purported NYT “newspaper of record” reputation it made for itself? Then they all seemingly come out of the woodwork.

Posted by: Tacitus | Nov 26 2017 4:56 utc | 120

Here is one more from American Conservative
Friedman’s Love Letter to a War Criminal
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/friedmans-love-letter-to-a-war-criminal/

Posted by: PartyOver | Nov 26 2017 4:58 utc | 121

What a nasty guy,
Hariri: Hezbollah’s regional positions ‘unacceptable’
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/11/hariri-hezbollah-regional-positions-unacceptable-171126081552149.html
Comes from a guy that have warloving wahabbi saudiarabis as his best friend.

Posted by: Anon | Nov 26 2017 9:36 utc | 122

Who knew the sultan’s favorite, Scheherazade of the thousand and one lies, had a moustache!

Posted by: Figaro | Nov 26 2017 14:21 utc | 123

“The Saudi silent majority is clearly fed up with the injustice of so many princes and billionaires ripping off their country. While foreigners, like me, were inquiring about the legal framework for this operation, the mood among Saudis I spoke with was: ‘Just turn them all upside down, shake the money out of their pockets and don’t stop shaking them until it’s all out!'”
quote from Friedman’s article.
If Friedman thinks this form of justice is so proper why doesn’t he promote it here in the US?

Posted by: Curtis | Nov 26 2017 14:35 utc | 124

@ TruthHunter Wow. This is the first valuation model I have seen that externalizes all its assumptions and inputs. The actual valuation of Saudi ARAMCO is indeed closer to 400 Billion as first reported by a UK firm. So much for the 1 trillion moonwalks hype. Suck on it, MBS.

Posted by: Martin | Nov 26 2017 19:30 utc | 125

@ Posted by: Hausmeister | Nov 25, 2017 4:33:26 AM | 79
Okay, resident manager. If you are unable to see the connection between what is happening with Earth based on the human condition, of whom Friedman is a perfect example, then you also miss the point of interdependence.
It is this interdependence that rules the Geo-politics of the present day. Friedman is a water carrier for the establishment and his thesis about how the world should ‘function’ is rather pathetic and MIC centered.
I find it also disturbing that a rather large bracket of the US population cannot see that Friedman is a big part of the problem, not of the solution and a solution to all this madness is sorely needed.
Otherwise one could get the impression that you give a flying eff about all the brown people in Yemen, Syria and elsewhere where the Royally Fascist Saudis pay proxies to exterminate those who differ in their sick ‘Wahhabbistic’ delusion of Islamic grandeur.
Wahhabbism is second only to the Nazis and their favorite methods of controlling their dissenters.
Keep gaslighting others who have not lost their critical thinking. But maybe it’s the message, the language that provides difficulties? Whatever it is, you are obviously unwilling to see the bigger, the much bigger picture that arises when looking through the deceit and the lies dished out by your owners.
The little conference of Friedman and the traditional enemies of Jewry is telling for those who pay attention to the results of such.
Another commenter said so fittingly “Qui Bono?” Who will benefit from this tea clutch in SA? The Yemenis? The Syrians? The World as a whole?
Next time you respond to my comment, please elaborate precisely where you miss the point. I am always more than willing to provide further insight into what I write. Otherwise your comment is very much akin to gaslighting.

Posted by: notheonly1 | Nov 27 2017 0:46 utc | 126

Perhaps the “fire hose wearing me out” is a Freudian slip. Maybe he’s fantasizing a little bit.

Posted by: Morongobill | Nov 27 2017 14:37 utc | 127

All the clued in know that the NYT is a Zionist rag and Friedman is a combination of both stupid and liar.
End of story.

Posted by: renfro | Nov 30 2017 16:44 utc | 128

Open Letter by Senior Middle East Scholars to the New York Times Regarding its Thomas Friedman’s column, “Saudi Arabia’s Arab Spring, At Last.”

Mr. Friedman’s description of the situation in Saudi Arabia is so divorced from reality as to call into question his competence as a journalist or opinion writer. …

Posted by: b | Nov 30 2017 19:57 utc | 129

@129 b.. thanks.. wow – they sure nailed it in that letter to the nyt.. the only thing missing is that the nyt has been a propaganda outlet for so long, they stopped caring whether anyone perceived them that way anymore.. i hope something comes of the letter, but i doubt it.. denial is a very strong force and on full display at all of the usa news outlets…

Posted by: james | Nov 30 2017 21:00 utc | 130

james @130–
“denial is a very strong force and on full display at all of the usa news outlets…”
Yeah, they’ve gotten away telling Big Lie after Big Lie for so long they believe the Ministry of Truth they’ve constructed to be unassailable, when in reality they’re as naked as Trump.

Posted by: karlof1 | Nov 30 2017 22:43 utc | 131