Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 25, 2017
Syria – U.S. CentCom Declares War On Russia

Yesterday three high ranking Russian officers were killed in an "ISIS attack" in eastern Syria. It is likely that they were killed by U.S. special forces or insurgents under U.S. special forces control. The incident will be understood as a declaration of war.

The U.S. Central Command in the Middle East wants the oil fields in east-Syria under control of its proxy forces to set up and control a U.S. aligned Kurdish mini-state in the area. The Syrian government, allied with Russia, needs the revenues of the oil fields to rebuild the country.


bigger

Last week the Russians issued sharply worded statements against U.S. coordination with al-Qaeda terrorists in Idleb province and warned of further escalation.

Yesterday the Russian Ministry of Defense accused the U.S. military in east-Syria of direct collaboration with the Islamic State:

US Army special units provide free passage for the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) through the battle formations of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) terrorists, the ministry said in a statement.

“Facing no resistance of the ISIS militants, the SDF units are advancing along the left shore of the Euphrates towards Deir ez-Zor,” the statement reads.

The newly released images “clearly show that US special ops are stationed at the outposts previously set up by ISIS militants.”

“Despite that the US strongholds being located in the ISIS areas, no screening patrol has been organized at them,” the Russian Ministry of Defense said.

This map marks the currently relevant conflict area – (U.S. proxies – yellow, SAA – red, ISIS – black):


Map by Weekend Warriorbigger

The accusations are plausible. Large parts of ISIS in Deir Ezzor consist of local tribal forces from eastern Syria. U.S. special envoy Brett McGurk recently met tribal leaders who had earlier pledged allegiance to ISIS. Deals were made. As we wrote:

The U.S. diplomat tasked with the job, Brett McGurk, recently met with local tribal dignitaries of the area. Pictures of the meeting were published. Several people pointed out that the very same dignitaries were earlier pictured swearing allegiance to the Islamic State.


bigger

Just like during the "Anbar Awaking" in its war on Iraq the U.S. is bribing the local radicals to temporarily change over to its side. This will help the U.S. to claim that it defeated ISIS. But as soon as the payments stop the very same forces will revert back to their old game.

The local criminal Ahmad Abu Khawla, who had earlier fought for ISIS, was suddenly installed as commander of a newly invented "Deir Ezzor Military Council", set up under U.S. special force control.

Last night a Russian three-star general and two colonels were killed in a mortar attack while they visited a Syrian army headquarters in Deir Ezzor:

Lieutenant-General Valery Asapov, of the Russian armed forces, has been killed after coming under shelling from Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) militants near Deir ez-Zor, the Russian Defense Ministry has announced.

In its statement, the ministry said that Asapov was at a command outpost manned by Syrian troops, assisting commanders in the liberation of the city of Deir ez-Zor.

Lieutenant-General Valery Asapov is the highest-ranking Russian officer to be killed in the Syrian campaign. He was a commander of the 5th Army in Russia’s Eastern Military District, one of the four strategic commands in the Russian Armed Forces. The army is based in Russia’s Far East, in the city of Ussuriysk, some 98 km (61 miles) from Vladivostok.

For three years ISIS had besieged Syrian troops in Deir Ezzor city and its airport. It had not once managed to successfully attack the Syrian headquarters or to kill high ranking officers. Now, as U.S. proxy forces "advised" by U.S. special forces, have taken position north of Deir Ezzor, "ISIS" suddenly has the intelligence data and precision mortar capabilities to kill a bunch of visiting Russian officers?

That is not plausible. No one in Damascus, Baghdad, Tehran or Moscow will believe that.

The Russian military, as usual, reacts calmly and officially attributes the attack to ISIS. Doing so avoids pressure to immediately react to the attack. (The U.S. will falsely interpret this as a face-saving Russian retreat.) 

But no one in Moscow will believe that the incident is independent of other recent maneuvers by the U.S. forces and independent of the earlier accusations the Russian military made against the U.S. forces.

Nominally the U.S. and Russia are both in Syria to fight the Islamic State. The Russian troops are legitimately there, having been invited by the Syrian government. The U.S. forces have no legal justification for their presence. So far open hostilities between the two sides had been avoided. But as the U.S. now obviously sets out to split Syria apart, openly cooperates with terrorists and does not even refrain from killing Russian officers, the gloves will have to come off.

U.S. Central Command has declared war on the Russian contingent in Syria. A high ranking Russian general was killed. This inevitably requires a reaction. The response does not necessarily have to come from Russian forces.  Moscow has many capable allies in the area. The response does not necessarily have to come in Syria.

"Accidents" and "incidents", like an "ISIS mortar attacks", or unintentional bombing of troop concentration of the other side, can happen on both sides of the front. Cars can blow up, bridges can collapse. Any U.S. officer or civilian official in the larger Middle East should be aware that they too are now targets.

Comments

#96
Laguerre,
Any particular reason you write Asad instead of Assad?

Posted by: CarlD | Sep 25 2017 21:33 utc | 101

The attack on Russia’s officers could have been from “contractors” operating from an Israeli chain of command. McMaster and Mattis were understudies to Petraeus, who remains behind the scenes, still connected to the zio contingents. Mike Morrell by several accounts set up a contract assasination shop when he left the CIA. I would look for a Petraeus/Morrell/Lieberman axis of evil operating on the ground near Deir Ezzor with perhaps passive support of US government field staff.
The agenda is of course Israeli and part of the run up to attacking — probably lebanon, Egypt, and of course Iran. What happens in Syria has to be seen in the broader context, geographically and historically. We are still unraveling the Ottoman Empire, which itself was a part of the Byzantine orthodox/Catholic schism. Russia has a religious agenda in addition to everything else, as do Turkey, Iran,Israel SA, etc. We are still in the Crusades and I do expect to see a Horns of Hattin moment before the conflict shifts to new terrain. Paul’s revisionism famously began on the road to Damascus, and the written Koran was first published there. Resources, sure, but this is holy ground, watered by blood, every inch.
Looks up the “Assassins” on Wikipedia. This was their home territory and some claim that they never went away — just morphed into Mossad.

Posted by: mireille | Sep 25 2017 21:43 utc | 102

>>>> Laguerre | Sep 25, 2017 11:10:58 AM | 51

It isn’t really, you know. It’s about having the oil to keep Syria and its army rolling. As you probably are aware, Asad and the rebels holding the oil-fields, currently Da’ish, have been trading oil under the table for a long time. 2012, was it? I thought everyone knew this by now. It’s been talked about a lot this year, if not before.

There might have been talk about it which I remember but who was the source for the evidence? United States government? What was the evidence? Some spreadsheets and documents allegedly seized from ISIS? Have the documents been made public? Not as far as I know, so given the long and illustrious history of the United States government and particularly its intelligence agencies making stuff up why should I or anybody else believe any of it?

Posted by: Ghostship | Sep 25 2017 21:53 utc | 103

>>>> Laguerre | Sep 25, 2017 5:06:37 PM | 96
Why don’t the Syrians just ask the Iranians for fuel? The Iranians are supposed to be subsidising the Syrian government in the amount of $5-15 billion a years and they have plenty of oil. So why don’t the Iranians supply it directly to the Syrians or because of the threat of interdiction supply oil to the Russians to supply to the Syrians. Far simpler and more reliable than buying through middlemen from ISIS.

Posted by: Ghostship | Sep 25 2017 22:01 utc | 104

@71 Peter AU 1
Movement of the Tigers is interesting to me as well. I had hoped that a degree of cooperation was negotiated between SDF and SAA forces that made their presence unnecessary but that does not look to be the case. You’ve got to think the forces of chaos would love to deal a devastating blow to this relatively small group through a massive air strike. Mistakes happen all the time right? Frankly this all stinks of desperation from the SDF handlers. In the end the oilfields are important but completely exposed and indefensible without also holding towns on the east bank of the Euphrates. That may be the most strategic medium term play.

Posted by: Sad Canuck | Sep 25 2017 22:29 utc | 105

If the SDF/YPG push for the oil fields of Syria was US plan B it was not a very well thought out one, as we are coming to expect from them. But undergirding the whole scenario must be an appreciation that Russia cannot back down on this one; it has a massive amount at stake plus international legality on its side. So the US will decide to move on and hope to hit Russia at a different time.

Posted by: Lochearn | Sep 25 2017 22:48 utc | 106

Laguerre | 96
Of course the tribes are the wild card in what’s going on east of the Euphrates. When ISIS first arrived in that area ISIS gave them a choice: ally with ISIS or die. Given that central Syrian government control had collapsed I don’t think the tribes had too much choice. The SDF could very well be a house of cards as is the ISIS/tribal coalition(s?). There are very likely intense negotiations going with the different tribes that previously allied with ISIS and those that ended up with the Kurds. These negotions would between the US/Kurd grouping on the one hand and SAG-R+6 coalition on the other hand. I suspect that there are very few people in the West fully understand the complexities involved in establishing the new coalitions. The SAG most certainly does.

Posted by: ToivoS | Sep 25 2017 23:19 utc | 107

I’d like to direct barflies to a PavewayIV comment at SouthFront concerning the oil pipelines, not projected gas pipelines, that seem to relate to the Outlaw US Empire’s strategy at the moment, https://southfront.org/syrian-army-renews-efforts-capture-t-2-pumping-station-near-border-iraq/#comment-3534975371
The heavy, motorized, bridging equipment airlifted to Syria was loaded directly onto semi trailers and sent on their way to the front, where they’ve presumably arrived. Unknown is where they’ll be deployed; perhaps in Deir Ezzor proper to facilitate river crossing within the inner city.
With luck, the news blackout will soon be lifted and we’ll know what’s happened during the past 72 hours, aside from fake news and their denials.

Posted by: karlof1 | Sep 25 2017 23:19 utc | 108

Opps! I goofed and included a link to SouthFront in my comment which got it sent to the spam bin. I was attempting to direct fellow barflies to a comment by PavewayIV on the article about the renewed push toward the T-2 pumping station and beyond since it has relevance to what now seems to be the current Outlaw US Empire’s strategy. So, if you want to read what he typed, go to SouthFront, then the T-2 item’s comment section. He even provides a graphic!

Posted by: karlof1 | Sep 25 2017 23:38 utc | 109

Interesting Twitter recap of a conversation with a Syrian government official about Kurds within Syria that provides a bit of their history I was unaware of, https://twitter.com/EHSANI22

Posted by: karlof1 | Sep 25 2017 23:54 utc | 110

@87 karlof1.. thanks.. i see what you mean! i have an account and they ask me to sign in, but i am abstaining for it and fb..
@91 laguerre.. thanks.. yes – a flip is possible given the fickle nature of these players.. same deal isis flipping to the sdf, or us side too i suppose..
@96 laguerre.. maybe.. saudi arabia and israel seem to have deep pockets..
@100 mireille.. interesting conjecture. thanks..
@012 ghostship.. yes, easy enough solution, but i think the idea is to keep syria as a nation state, as opposed to dividing it up.. was usa going in to get rid of isis, or help divide syria since option 1 – getting rid of assad, feel thru? i know my answer!
@106 karlof1… “SouthFront, then the T-2 item’s comment section.” not finding it… can you be a more specific?? date of post? title of sf article?? thanks. i have looked at 2 already…

Posted by: james | Sep 26 2017 0:07 utc | 111

Hoarsewhisper #43: “Make insular AmeriKKKans feel as helpless and victimised…”
That’s a slippery slope. We’re feeling it: frustration, anger, even ranklement/bitterness, but not so much anymore the envy (/covetousness/jealousy) of the rich and powerful, more like hate of them.
Posted by: Bob Beal | Sep 25, 2017 12:47:59 PM | 61

I agree it’s a slippery slope, but isn’t retaliation against an aggressor always risky? I expressed that sentiment to set a benchmark against which to measure Russia’s impending response to Yankee short-term thinking (Vlad has never phoned H-w to ask “What should I do next” and is unlikely ever to do so).

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Sep 26 2017 0:58 utc | 112

I guess the powers that be are beginning to see the writing on the wall about Assad……although the article is full of a lot of bull shit what I find heartening are the comments….many of them see right through the mainstream media fake news…..
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/world/middleeast/syria-assad-war.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Posted by: notlurking | Sep 26 2017 1:34 utc | 113

@110
Yes a few good reader comments there, but man what a load of crap from the ‘toilet paper of record’…
I love this part, ie the standard narrative…

‘Syria’s conflict began in 2011 with a popular uprising against Mr. Assad, which his security forces sought to suppress with overwhelming force. The opposition took up arms, and the United States, Saudi Arabia and others endorsed the rebels’ cause, backing them politically and giving them arms and cash…’

And the rest of the story goes like this…but the evil Grinch killed his own people and beautiful babies, and threw the noble freedom fighting prince in the dungeon, and nobody lived happily ever after…
You gotta be kidding me…amazingly some of the brain-dead single-cell organisms among the commenters there actually buy that whole tale…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 26 2017 2:21 utc | 114

@mireille, #100
“The attack on Russia’s officers could have been from “contractors” operating from an Israeli chain of command.”
I thought the same thing and it concerns me. The US military will play tough but they will back down from an impossible win like the one they face in Syria now. The Israeli’s will do everything and anything possible to defeat Assad and create a Kurdish state including trying to get the US to fight Russia. Of course the Israelis will not shed any of their own blood but they have no qualms about pitting the US against Russia, Iran, Syria, etc.

Posted by: alaric | Sep 26 2017 3:07 utc | 115

US? THERE are Spec Ops from several Euro and ME States, Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Egypt, Norway, Saudi, Jordan,and Poland; Now from what area of SYria that .Murdoch, , Rothschild and Cheney’s proposed pipeline to Mediteranian Sea and thence to Euro refineries begin at.
Oh and lest we forget the chosen Ones Spec Ops as well.
Now as to attitude of US military from PFC to Staff Officers tank commanders to bomb and fighter pilots.
These are not old time citizen soldiers, read their GenerL orders, they are “Warriors” to point of Cults.
DO NOT THINK THAT AS PROFESSIONAL MILITARY WARRIORS THAT THE MOST ELITE SPEC OPS TANK AND ARMOR COMMANDERS. AND FIGHTER/BOMBER PILOTS are not chomping at bits to prove that they are better warriors then them damn Ruskies are, it is machismo true but they are not nor ever eere up agInst real military professionals.
US has been slaughtering lightly armed and poorly trained ( Iraq was a turmey shoot in which the regular Iraq militarily surrendered en mass in first 30 days, put on civies and walked home. Leaving but militias to fightreligious militias .

Posted by: Hide Behind | Sep 26 2017 3:11 utc | 116

I predict that the SAA and its friends will cross the Euphrates in large number and then move a large formation towards whatever the objective is there (the oil fields). The US special ops will simply leave the area. Russia will simply stick to the mission rather than start a tit for tat retaliation feud.
As I said before, the Jihadist network, US, Israel know they’ve lost the war on the ground. That leaves them with a new strategy of trying to take out high propaganda value Russian targets in Syria and in Russia. That means Russian civilians. I hope the Russians are very careful. Israel/USA/Saudi are capable of perverse violence against civilians.

Posted by: alaric | Sep 26 2017 3:12 utc | 117

Posted by: notlurking | Sep 25, 2017 9:34:41 PM | 110
Thank you for that NYT article and yes, it is really heartening to see so many sane commenters who know the actual history/players of the war in Syria.

Posted by: frances | Sep 26 2017 3:13 utc | 118

“Thank you for that NYT article and yes, it is really heartening to see so many sane commenters who know the actual history/players of the war in Syria.”
I believe it is safe to assume that the various US regime intelligence agencies and neocon politicians are livid over what should have been a standard:
* Send in violent agitators
* Fire at the police
* Spew endless ‘murderous dictator killing his own people’ propaganda
* Ram through a UN mandate with force
* Make sure that the target country continually fails at the mandate demands
* Launch massive air campaign against the target country
* Have US regime ‘peacekeepers’ occupy the country due to its complete destruction
* Have US regime hand picked lackey ready to step in
* Maintain a low level terror threat to justify permanent US regime military bases throughout the country for its ‘security’.
I don’t want to diminish in any way the amazing work Russia has done in coming to Syria’s aid in its fight against foreign terrorists and mercenaries. But…
I believe the real power shift with Syria compared to past US regime change operations has been social media and the direct unfiltered access of the worldwide public to information from countries like Syria. Russia would have been utterly powerless to come to Syria’s aid if an army of non-professional Internet information gathering and dispersal army had not been working 24/7 in countering the insane Syria propaganda machine.
US regime intelligence agencies must be sitting around in meetings desperately trying to come up with ways cut off the general public’s access to unfiltered information from countries like Syria.
I don’t think it is tin foil hat territory to see laws being passed that treat any non-US regime approved news or information coming out of countries like Syria as ‘collaborating with the enemies of the state’ or ‘terrorist propaganda’.

Posted by: Terscich | Sep 26 2017 3:50 utc | 119

The world-wide bully is trying to pick a fight by picking off some of the Russian military in Syria. It probably won’t work to incense Russia enough to respond directly, though one never knows what Russia could or would do using its own proxies either in the middle east or perhaps even in the Ukraine.
The Russians would do well to continue keeping their eye on the ball….
Their game plan is sound: continue to work getting back the oil fields in eastern Syria, build their new military base in Deir ez-Zor, and then position some advanced anti-missile systems and intelligence resources in it.
It does strike me though that with the willful killing of a Russian general by US-backed proxies (if it wasn’t actually US forces themselves), all prior bets may be off. Maybe… as the Russians have proven themselves to be amazing patient and skillful at avoiding direct conflict with the US, no matter how badly provoked

Posted by: michaelj72 | Sep 26 2017 4:03 utc | 120

there are some news articles today in the western press about this, very short pieces compared to the lengthy CNN piece about the US saying it was closely surveilling russian troops etc in Syria
Russian diplomat: Death of commander ‘is the price paid in blood’ for US policy in Syrian civil war
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/russian-diplomat-death-of-commander-is-the-price-paid-in-blood-for-us-policy-in-syrian-civil-war/article/2635555
Moscow blames ‘two-faced U.S. policy’ for Russian general’s Syria death: RIA
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-russia-casualtie/moscow-blames-two-faced-u-s-policy-for-russian-generals-syria-death-ria-idUSKCN1C01W6?il=0
Russia general killed in Syria fighting
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/russia-general-killed-syria-fighting-50061119
‘Highest Ranking’ Russian General Killed in ISIS Attack in Syria
http://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/syria/1.814028
“….On Saturday, U.S. allied forces seized a major gas field in Deir al-Zor from Islamic State militants in rapid advances that preempted the Syrian government that was also heading in that direction….”
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/syria/1.814028

Posted by: michaelj72 | Sep 26 2017 4:20 utc | 121

I think everyone ought to read this link..
https://www.globalresearch.ca/kurdish-pkk-and-ypgs-hidden-notorious-crimes-kidnapping-murder-and-narcotics-trafficking/5610540
and think about the Treaty of Sèvres, treaty sec I, art 1-260, treaty sect ii, annex and art 261 to 433 . (Aug. 10, 1920), never adopted, superseded (1923) by Treaty of Lausanne post-World War I pact between victorious Allied powers and Ottoman representatives. Treaty abolished Ottoman Empire and obliged Turkey renounce all rights over Arab Asia and North Africa, evolved independent Armenia, established autonomous Kurdistan, Rejected by the new Turkish nationalist regime. The reason for the mandates was to allow the governing nations to assist their oil and gas constituents in keeping corporate control over the oil (see Glenny).
Track from first global bankers congress (1897) Switzerland, through German vs Britain/France quest for oil in Bagdad (WWI, Britain Belfour Agreement, British mandates over Palestine were about control of the oil in the larger Ottoman empire, Letters to US President(1913) from relatively new NYC immigrants, together with British generated psycho oriented propaganda, encouraged USA to deliver Americans to enforce the Balfour agreement assuring oil and gas control to certain corporate interest. The reason for Israel may not have been for a Jewish homeland at all, but instead to establish a military base close enough to the ME oil to assure certain corporate profit. Its about corporate control of oil; the nation states are needed to provide the funding and military to secure and control oil opportunity. The Jew vs Arab (and Inter Arab religious warfare) fits a subterfuge smoke screen model better than historical propaganda.. its about corporate control of oil.. and to determine if war will ensue, study the ownership and market needs of the oil and gas interest and assess the relative military strengths of the nations that will be called upon to force its citizens to back the oil and gas wars. the decisions to go to war will be found in this oil and gas ownership king of the mountain game, not in philosophical racial or religious rhetoric.

Posted by: posterforsure | Sep 26 2017 4:29 utc | 122

A very interesting article over at ZH.
Garet Garrett authored a book; The Rise of Empire.
In it he describes the path the U.S. is presently on; he died in 1954; but his words are prescient to say the least
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-25/exit-strategy-empire

Posted by: V. Arnold | Sep 26 2017 5:06 utc | 123

@119 posterforsure
Well isn’t that cute……George Soros has a Kurdish army.

Posted by: Sad Canuck | Sep 26 2017 6:40 utc | 124

Is there any difference between Trump threatening war with north korea and morgan Freeman threatening war with Russia?

Posted by: Thegenius | Sep 26 2017 6:47 utc | 125

Excellent thread, very thoughtful postings. Cheers.
The publication of Russian aerial intel on US vehicles in enemy positions reminded me of the Kennedy showing imagery of missile sites in Cuba. No doubt the Russian eyes in the sky are watching the US coalition along with the other terrorist groups as they move about.
I cannot place the original source but there has been some reports of Russia stating that they will return fire on any position that attacks them or their protected friends.
In short, the line is pretty much drawn. Targets painted. Yankee go home.

Posted by: Stumpy | Sep 26 2017 7:34 utc | 126

All them jewish kurd waving the double flags of israel and (fictitious) Kurdistan while dancing in the streets of tel aviv today, all giddy with joy as they celebrate the (deluded) ‘division’ of Iraq: they all remind me of the pathetic neocon Cubans of Miami and them Shahist intellectual dwarfs banging on pots and pans for attention.
Man, it’s so easy to fool people; so unbearably easy to lead human sheep to the slaughterhouse.

Posted by: Taxi | Sep 26 2017 9:34 utc | 127

Walid Muallem, Syria’s Foreign Minister, in an interview aired on Al-Mayadeen TV today said that he has proof that the US had given Daeish precise intelligence that directed them to the location of the Russian General, who was assassinated in a Daeish attack a couple of days ago.

Posted by: Taxi | Sep 26 2017 10:47 utc | 128

This has to be the endgame – territorial integrity with negotiated autonomy.
Syria is capable of this.
For the same to work in Iraq the northern oil fields must return to central goverment’s commmand – a step that Turkey may well be facilitating as we speak.
I believe that what we are seeing is fine tuning of balance of powers to enable political settlement. Kurds need to be reined-in in Iraq, but allowed more autonomy in Syria.
Whether territorial integrity was ever at threat is questionable because that would lead to complete implosion of the ME.
The only other scenario that springs to mind is Syria and Iran bolting down political accord with Kurds while Iraq and Turkey see Kurdish independece and conflict. This could benefit Syria and Iran significantly, and probably lead to a safe southern belt.
“theregion.org/m/news/11638-damascus-says-syrian-kurdish-autonomy-negotiable”

Posted by: AtaBrit | Sep 26 2017 10:54 utc | 129

Re: Posted by: Terscich | Sep 25, 2017 11:50:32 PM | 116
Your point about the difference with Syria isn’t really valid.
Libya & Syria uprisings started at the same time. Exactly the same time.
So why are they different?
It isn’t because of social media – not at all.
They’re are different because Syria is a lynchpin for the region – and without Syria Russia & Iran become terrible exposed to encirclement – it’s as simple as that.
Then you have Tartus, you have gas pipelines, you have long-standing alliances that put your (as in Russian) credibility at stake as a worthwhile ally.

Posted by: Julian | Sep 26 2017 11:30 utc | 130

Surging oil price keeps Russian Ruble strongest currency

Oil is rising on news that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan threatened to cut off the pipeline from northern Iraq’s Kurdish autonomous region over its independence referendum.

Is this the end of US Dominance in Global Energy
The whole oilprice.com issue is fun.
The world is full of unintended consequences nowadays.

Posted by: somebody | Sep 26 2017 11:38 utc | 131

CarlD at 92: on the USA, So yes, they are bluffing but they are condemned to engage whoever opposes their views.
One characteristic of powerful groups is a disdain for weighing options and making calculations concerning outcomes (see alice in wonderland for ex.) and just acting ‘on the mo’ running on obsolete schemas. So, unknown eruptions.
Thus, the military quasi-coup that took place in the US under Trump can be viewed positively (> reality check) or negatively (> MIC in power). In such uncertain volatile situations, the military/security apparatus often supports the upstart, the technocratic Gvmt, the new quasi-fascist choice, etc. (Not in France, Macron alienated the milit. right away, so many diff. situations can exist…) because when things go to sh*t they do come into their own, or grab the oppo, and smartly prefer to kow-tow to the legitimacy of ‘instituted’ power.
The insuperable difficulty for the USA is that there are too many masters, too many competing forces, .. factions, … options, and while these parties avoid direct competition, they can’t agree.
It is the ulitmate ‘free-market’ model in a sort of ‘flat earth’ where the ‘top dog’ can act. Internationally, serving Israel and KSA, not to mention Ukro neo-nazis, using ISIS as a proxy force, supporting the MB and military dictatorships, destabilising e.g. Venezuela, and controlling the EU, etc. etc. doesn’t fit together into any kind of coherent plan that jells in function of some, in fact, any ‘aim’ – it is more like a new Retail Super YourBIZlove Co. knocking out competition (locals, small suppliers, the newco., etc, gotta get those dog-owners on board, and the beggars away, but hire the camp girls, elect Tommy for Mayor, etc.) At home, the banksters and big corps rule the roost (bought pols) but then there is hard sell to the ‘people’ which no longer works, etc.
Imho, Syria is the case that brought that confusion to light. (More so than Lybia.)

Posted by: Noirette | Sep 26 2017 13:18 utc | 132

@116
that’s ridiculous…
So-called social media has been a boon to the deep state and NGOs involved in color revolutions…
The fake ‘Arab Spring’ relied heavily on social media to stir up students and others in regime change target countries…many trumpeted it as the ‘Facebook revolution’…
Gene Sharp, the father of regime change ‘color revolutions’ has deep ties to the deep state…including CIA, pentagon, NED, RAND etc…
His protege Srdja Popvic, exposed by Wikileaks as being a Stratfor man was behind the toppling of Milosevic in 2000…
The social media has become a powerful tool in the regime change toolbox…as well as a portal for NSA surveillance of a dumb and dumber public who choose to indulge such idiotic platforms as instagram, twitter and facebook…
Even the so-called ‘alternative’ media has been co-opted by the same people who are the puppetmasters behind the MSM…
Prime example being Counterpunch…which used to be a reliable source for truth-digging, but has now become an apparatchik of the deep state…for example its ‘national security columnist’ Melvin Goodman, an ex-CIA man, now on the Soros payroll at the Center for International Policy…
He intones regularly on Counterpunch with such gems as the ‘sanctity’ of the Russia investigation…others are mainly pussy hatters and identity politics types…
Antiwar.com did good work during the Yugoslavia destruction in the ’90s, but by 2011 was parroting the the MSM line that Assad was killing his own people…lately they have changed their tune 180 degrees on Syria [like many others, ie Max Blumenthal]…when it became obvious that the NYT narrative was no longer palatable for individuals of reasonable intelligence…
I have never used social media [other than watching animal documentaries on youtube] nor do I intend to…yet even as early as 1992 I was aware that something had drastically changed in the truthfulness and reliability of the news media…
The imperialist project to dismember the socialist country of Yugoslavia started conveniently before the dust had even settled on the collapse of the USSR…something that would have been unthinkable in Soviet times…
Revanchinst Nazis and fundamentalist Muslims were portrayed as heroes and victims…Mujahedin poured into Bosnia, while Christian Serbs were driven from their homes and farms and portrayed as Nazi beasts…while the memory of the WW2 Jasenovac death camp where hundreds of thousands of Serbs, Jews, Roma and Nazi resisters of all nationalities were butchered, was buried under a bulldozer advance of Orwellian lies and war propaganda…
I spent the Reagan years in university in the US…I remember well the press of the era and its credibility…the Pentagon papers, My Lai, Watergate…etc…
within five years of the Soviet collapse the transformation was complete…a basically truthful press had morphed suddenly into a Big Lie machine…
You didn’t need social media to wake up and smell the roses…still don’t…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 26 2017 13:30 utc | 133

I just read a comment elsewhere that I wanted to share here. The discussion was the way in which Russia “fears” to engage the US too directly. The reminder was that in all our armchair battle discussions we always forget about the civilians, and the massacre of the innocents. Russia never forgets these people – she’s lost far too many of them in living history.
The comment said: imagine a room full of kids being held at gunpoint by a handful of psychopaths. The Russian task is to eliminate the psychos without hurting any of the children.
This is how Russia will continue to act in Syria, and around the world in the several theaters and on the various planes of activity. Personally, I see it working astonishingly well – wondrously, as some kind of quiet miracle brought to a world that was in despair.

Posted by: Grieved | Sep 26 2017 13:36 utc | 134

The Russians have built a proper bridge across the Euphrates with a capacity for 8000 vehicles a day. This supplements the vanguard pontoon bridge:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjK9T7rUBZc
Location
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKo1dstX0AEgdva.jpg

Posted by: Anonymous | Sep 26 2017 13:37 utc | 135

“The reminder was that in all our armchair battle discussions we always forget about the civilians, and the massacre of the innocents. Russia never forgets these people – she’s lost far too many of them in living history.”
Posted by: Grieved | Sep 26, 2017 9:36:54 AM | 131
The Russian “exceptionalism”. Permit me to puke.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Second_Chechen_War#Civilian_casualties

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 26, 2017 9:30:18 AM | 130
Good observations. Main benefit of social media seems to have been to intelligence agencies. Look how many useful idiots they have dredged up using nothing more than 140 characters.

Posted by: nobody | Sep 26 2017 13:44 utc | 136

Sputnik is now reporting that Tu95 heavy bombers have carried out cruise missile strikes in Deir Ezzor and Idlib…

‘Konashenkov stressed that all the destroyed targets were far away from settlements, the positions of US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) as well as from the strongholds of US security services…

And now with that bridge up and running and heavy armor pouring in we are going to see just who takes what on the left bank…
The Kh101 is a big bruiser…about twice the weight of a tomahawk…2,400 kg vs 1,300 kg…not sure of its warhead weight, but we can assume it packs a decent punch…
Would hate to find out later that some re-uniformed SDF/ISIS and US SOF were in the wrong place at the wrong time…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 26 2017 14:27 utc | 137

The road to war with Russia started nearly 2 years ago on September 29th, 2015. That’s when Russia destroyed an ISIS oil tanker caravan on it’s way to sell oil to Erdogan in Turkey at 10 cents on the dollar. Thus helping to fund ISIS. The USA strategically allowed these caravans unfettered access to Turkey to allow Erdogan’s family to enrich themselves and ISIS to fund themselves all the while spreading propaganda that the US military was fighting ISIS. US interests need to control Syria so that the corporate interests can build their beloved natural gas pipeline from U.A.E. through Syria to Turkey. Enabling them to effectively compete against Russia for a share of Europe’s natural gas market. That’s what this battle over Syria is all about. All wars have an economic component regarding the reason for war. It matters not who these interested parties work with to attain their goal. As with all greed, the end justifies the means.

Posted by: The Prescient Minority | Sep 26 2017 14:36 utc | 138

Let’s try to unwind this…
Yesterday the Russian deputy foreign minister laid the blame on the US for the death of Russian general Valery Asapov…using extremely strong language of ‘two-faced US policy’…
Worth noting that this is coming from a senior diplomat, Lavrov’s deputy, not the MoD…and the gravity of this was noted in the US media picking up the story…
But just days before we had reports of an unprecedented face to face meeting between the Russian and US military about avoiding conflict in Deir Ezzor…and where maps and graphics were presented…
Just several days after that ‘historic’ meeting a Russian general is dead…[photographs of him right on the Euphrates shore are posted at southfront…]
So…one wonders about those ‘maps’ and ‘graphics’ that the US side presented…is that the double-dealing the Russian foreign ministry is slamming…?
And now the Russian cruise missiles are flying, as expected…one has to wonder about Konashenkov’s statement about avoiding ‘known’ US and SDF positions…while also adding this…

‘I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the Daesh strongholds, where US special forces were spotted, lack any signs of fighting. There are no shell craters…’

I wonder if the Tu95s were using those same US maps…goose meet gander…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 26 2017 15:03 utc | 139

Thanks Grieved, and nobody. Nailed it.

Posted by: Juliania | Sep 26 2017 15:14 utc | 140

One of the primary roots of the Southwest Asian Problem Tree is the Balfour Declaration that created the basis for the destruction of Palestine and the foundation for the colonial-settler state called Israel. At the UNGA, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas did not follow his prescripted speech to address PM May in what Craig Murray termed “a stunning rebuke” I would never have known about if not for reading his blog, where it’s part of a longer essay. Here’s what Abbas said:
“My message to you, Mrs May, as Prime Minister of this country, if I may be so bold, is this: when David Lloyd George, your predecessor in the role, issued the Balfour Declaration on 2nd November 1917, he was committing a heinous crime against ninety-seven per cent of the population of Palestine. The evil consequences of that crime reverberate down to our present day. As an educated woman, especially one in such a high position, you know all that, I am sure.
“Which is why I am astounded by your cold reluctance, your seeming inability, to be moved by the 100 years of misery, injustice, destruction and atrocities inflicted on the Palestinians by their oppressors, first the British, then the Israelis. You appear equally impervious to the cries of anger and frustration from thousands of people in this country, of all faiths and none, faced with HMG’s refusal to make good on the promise in the second part of the Balfour Declaration. A simple gesture of sympathy with non-Jewish Palestinians, the descendants of the indigenous Christians and Muslims of historical Palestine in 1917, would be a start. How can it not occur to you what an enormous benefit that would have for peace and security in the Middle East and wider afield?
“The iconic suffering of the Palestinian people is a sore that needs to be healed. Only Britain has the ability to administer the healing balm. How long will they, and the world, have to wait, Prime Minister, for the healing to begin? When will you make a start?”
Murray adds this contextual help at the end: “The ignored part of the Balfour Convention to which Abbas referred is of course: ‘It being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.'”
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2017/09/president-abbas-rebuke-theresa-may-palestine/
IMO, until the festering sore of Palestine gets healed by removing the cancer within it, the region will continue to be destabilized and dysfunctional no matter how good the intentions of the actual International Community or the total purging of Islamic terrorists for the cancer itself is terroristic.

Posted by: karlof1 | Sep 26 2017 15:30 utc | 141

good video on RT of the ‘Bears’ cruise missile strikes today…
https://www.rt.com/news/404651-russian-bombers-isis-syria/
they were accompanied by Su30 and Su35 fighters and refueled en route…covered 7000 km round trip from Engels air base, overflying Iran and Iraq…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 26 2017 15:39 utc | 142

SDF has announced its intention to destroy Syria’s territorial integrity and “hopes that the US military will stay in Syria for decades, spokesman for the SDF, Talal Silo, told Reuters,” as reported today by SouthFront. There’s more at the original Reuters’s item, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-usa-exclusive/exclusive-u-s-forces-to-stay-in-syria-for-decades-say-militia-allies-idUSKCN1AX1RI
IMO, this announcement will result in green-lighting the assault against the newest Outlaw US Empire proxy, who seem to be filled with their Imperial Master’s hubris.
In other news, Russian engineers have emplaced a bridge capable of bearing tanks and other heavy military assets. Video here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjK9T7rUBZc

Posted by: karlof1 | Sep 26 2017 15:58 utc | 143

Grieved @131
“I see it working astonishingly well – wondrously, as some kind of quiet miracle brought to a world that was in despair.”
I see this too, and I nurture the hope it brings me. The metaphor, children held at gunpoint by psychopaths, is indeed playing out “around the world in the several theaters and on the various planes of activity.” This community of barflies is part of the larger quiet global movement to disarm the psychopaths. We each (even us lurkers) spend an hour or more nearly every day in working at making what the I Ching calls “energetic progress in the good” This matters.

Posted by: bc | Sep 26 2017 16:23 utc | 144

@ 135
You omitted Israhell and the oil in occupied Golan Heights. That’s really what this war is all about. The U.S. capital and seat of government is in Tel Aviv. D.C. is only the annex.
@ Karlofi
A twist of fate; it would have been Uganda. The once oppressed are now the oppressors and the world community dare not protest the apartheid.

Posted by: likklemore | Sep 26 2017 16:23 utc | 145

@133
Not sure what you’re ‘puking’ about…
You seem to take issue with Grieved’s notion that Russian military is more careful about hitting non-combatants…
then you point to a wikipedia article about Chechen war civilian casualties…which is a mishmash of competing figures from any number of sources…some probably credible, and some obvious stooges of US NGOs like the Russian ‘human rights’ group ‘Memorial’…
If that’s your argument, then I would say that Grieved’s much more articulate comment stands unrefuted…
Everyone is well familiar with the US disregard for civilian life, from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the obliteration of North Korea [SAC chief Curtis LeMay famously bragged…’we killed what 20 percent of the population…?]
then Vietnam, then the illegal Iraq invasion,and on and on…even before all of that we had Teddy Roosevelt’s war of extermination in the Philippines…and before that the wholesale genocide of the Native Americans as the US settler state expanded into the West after the Louisiana Territory purchase from the French…
Any reasonable observer would be hard pressed to equate that record of brutality, over such a long time period, to any other entity…even the Mongols and Huns fall short…arguably even the Third Reich…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 26 2017 16:24 utc | 146

@ 139
Thanks for sharing the link. This morsel sticks out as a sore, swollen thumb:

The spokesman stressed that the terrorist targets destroyed during the operation were “outside of residential areas and at a safe distance from support points of US Special Forces and the fighters of the Syrian Democratic Forces, located in areas controlled by IS
Konashenkov also said it was puzzling that the aerial photos of American support points showed no signs of any military action around them.
“This begs the question: With whom and against whom are the US Special Forces fighting in Syria,”which still remains unanswered by Washington, he said.

FFS. puzzling!!?. The answer is found in ”American support points.”
US Special Forces are there to help IS, to fight SAA; otherwise we would use the descriptor internecine.
MoD of the RF is slooow to saddle up and serve a cold dish.

Posted by: likklemore | Sep 26 2017 16:40 utc | 147

“Israeli flags won’t save you”, Erdogan told the Turk today. He also threatened them with severe economic sanctions and famine.
He shoulda threatened israel too while he was at it.

Posted by: Taxi | Sep 26 2017 16:41 utc | 148

Thank you flankerbandit @143
I followed nobody’s @133 link, too, found the same “mishmash of competing figures,” and agree that “Grieved’s much more articulate comment stands unrefuted.”
Americans are in deep, deep denial about how very many innocents have died at the hands of their government. And while we refuse to awaken to the horror, and our complicity-in-absentia, the horrors metastasize.
Also briefly looked into the history of the Chechen wars — and surprise, surprise:

“Putin stated that the terror in Chechnya and in the Russian Caucasus in the early 1990’s was actively backed by the CIA and western Intelligence services to deliberately weaken Russia. He noted that the Russian FSB foreign intelligence had documentation of the US covert role without giving details.
What Putin, an intelligence professional of the highest order, only hinted at in his remarks, I have documented in detail from non-Russian sources. The report has enormous implications to reveal to the world the long-standing hidden agenda of influential circles in Washington to destroy Russia as a functioning sovereign state, an agenda which includes the neo-nazi coup d’etat in Ukraine and severe financial sanction warfare against Moscow. ” “>http://russia-insider.com/en/society/what-if-putin-telling-truth/ri6952

Adds another layer to the fog surrounding that mishmash from wiki.

Posted by: bc | Sep 26 2017 16:50 utc | 149

Wow. More from the above-linked article:

According to Yossef Bodansky, then Director of the US Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, Washington was actively involved in “yet another anti-Russian jihad, seeking to support and empower the most virulent anti-Western Islamist forces.”
Bodansky revealed the entire CIA Caucasus strategy in detail in his report, stating that US Government officials participated in,
“a formal meeting in Azerbaijan in December 1999 in which specific programs for the training and equipping of Mujahideen from the Caucasus, Central/South Asia and the Arab world were discussed and agreed upon, culminating in Washington’s tacit encouragement of both Muslim allies (mainly Turkey, Jordan and Saudi Arabia) and US ‘private security companies’. . . to assist the Chechens and their Islamist allies to surge in the spring of 2000 and sustain the ensuing Jihad for a long time…Islamist Jihad in the Caucasus as a way to deprive Russia of a viable pipeline route through spiraling violence and terrorism.”
The most intense phase of the Chechen wars wound down in 2000 only after heavy Russian military action defeated the Islamists. It was a pyrrhic victory, costing a massive toll in human life and destruction of entire cities. The exact death toll from the CIA-instigated Chechen conflict is unknown. Unofficial estimates ranged from 25,000 to 50,000 dead or missing, mostly civilians. Russian casualties were near 11,000 according to the Committee of Soldiers’ Mothers.
The Anglo-American oil majors and the CIA’s operatives were happy. They had what they wanted: their Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan oil pipeline, bypassing Russia’s Grozny pipeline.

Posted by: bc | Sep 26 2017 17:01 utc | 150

@146…147
thanks for that bc…
your link didn’t work but I found the story here…
http://russia-insider.com/en/society/what-if-putin-telling-truth/ri6952
Written by William Engdahl…very knowledgeable guy, especially energy geopolitics…
Funny thing too about that CIA pipeline…’Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan’ running from Azerbaijan, through Georgia and terminating on Turkey’s Mediterranean coast…
Didn’t know this pipeline was also part of a Hollywood-CIA co-production…

‘The pipeline was a central plot point in the James Bond film The World Is Not Enough (1999). One of the central characters, Elektra King, is responsible for the construction of an oil pipeline through the Caucasus, from the Caspian Sea to the Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Named the “King pipeline” in the film, it is a thinly disguised version of the BTC…’

this from wikipedia ‘Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline’…
And even more surprises…turns out that the pipeline was at one point blown up by the Kurds, as it runs through Turkish Kurdistan…
Ahh how quickly the US changes horses…yesterday it was flying cover for Turkey’s bloody suppression of the Kurds…[starting 1978 and claiming thousands of lives and over a million ethnically cleansed]
And today, Uncle Scam is promising those same Kurds [PKK in Turkey is till officially recognized as terrorists by US] a slice of Syria…and probably Iraq [while saying the opposite publicly]
Well at least the US is consistent in its duplicity…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 26 2017 17:38 utc | 151

@140 Mercouris writes here about the bridge:
http://theduran.com/syrian-war-update-russia-builds-bridge-across-euphrates/

Posted by: Lozion | Sep 26 2017 17:45 utc | 152

Thanks for the working link, flankerbandit, and more of the crazy, duplicitous details. Ugh. The whole ugly mess would be a farce through and through if not for the suffering of innocents and the endless meaningless attempted destruction of everything noble in the human spirit.

Posted by: bc | Sep 26 2017 17:56 utc | 153

If I may drop this here without comment:
https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/breaking-video-isis-fighter-admits-isis-forbidden-attack-kurdish-forces-deir-ezzor/

Posted by: E | Sep 26 2017 18:47 utc | 154

Now that the Ministry of Defense is on top of it I can go back to sleep. It could not have been said better than this article said it.

Posted by: Ha'ashkee Ndaa'Ke'O'N'dee | Sep 26 2017 21:05 utc | 155

james @112–
Looks like b was able to find my comment with link in spam bag and is now @109.

Posted by: karlof1 | Sep 26 2017 23:07 utc | 156

@157 karlof1.. thanks! i am just opening it now…
in other news – substitute syria for iraq or syrian people for iraqi people down below… this is a usa daily press briefing from today… see how messed up the usa view is towards syria??
“QUESTION: Thank you. So on your statement, you said that you will continue your historic relationship with the Kurdish people. Do you mean only the Kurdish people or with the Kurdish government as well?
MS NAUERT: Well, I think our conversations will be ongoing. We will continue to have conversations both with our friends in Baghdad as well as our friends in the north as well. We have a lot of conversations, as you all know. We have a close relationship with both. The United States Government and the coalition’s concern about this and the timing of this referendum was we didn’t want to splinter Iraq. We see the primary issue as taking on ISIS, defeating ISIS, annihilating ISIS, so that they never come to try to rule over and terrorize the Iraqi people again. We’d like to keep our eye on the ball with that. That failed; that is a concern of ours and is deeply disappointing.
QUESTION: And one more question. Aren’t you worried that by clearly taking the side of Baghdad you might discourage compromise on the side of Baghdad, or you might actually increase —
MS NAUERT: I would take issue with the premise of your question. We don’t see it as taking sides with Baghdad. We support a unified, democratic Iraq. Okay?
QUESTION: But by opposing the referendum, isn’t that taking side with Baghdad’s position?
MS NAUERT: We support a unified, democratic Iraq, and we want everybody to keep the – keep their eye on the ball, and that is annihilating ISIS.
QUESTION: And on Iran’s decision to halt air flights between Kurdistan – from and to Kurdistan, would you condemn that?
MS NAUERT: I’m not aware of that, so I’m sorry, I don’t have anything for you on that. Anything – anything? Anything with – Laurie. Hi, how are you?
QUESTION: I’m fine. You said you want to see constructive dialogue. What about President Erdogan’s statement that – threatening to close the border and to cut off oil exports? “When we close the… taps, their revenues will vanish… they won’t be able to find food.” Is that constructive dialogue?
MS NAUERT: I think that that would – that certainly sounds like a threat on the part of President Erdogan. But I’m not going to comment on what he’s had to say.
QUESTION: And what about these implicit threats of military action against the Kurdistan region? What is your view of them?
MS NAUERT: Military action by —
QUESTION: By Turkey, Iran, and Iraq.
MS NAUERT: Look, we want safety and security for the Iraqi people. We had tremendous concerns with this referendum. We’ve certainly talked about that a lot. That referendum had no basis in the Iraqi constitution or the law, and I’ll just leave it at that. Okay?
https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2017/09/274443.htm

Posted by: james | Sep 26 2017 23:36 utc | 157

from paveway a day ago… more at @157 link.. thanks karlof1!
“Neither of the historic pipelines below are operable today, but one will be very soon. Iraq stands to make a fortune if it can get oil directly to a Mediterranean port via pipeline for export. The cost-benefit is a no-brainer. Pumping stations: T = Tripoli, H = Haifa and K = Kirkuk
Guess which pipeline Israel prefers, and guess which one must be prevented at all costs? US clownfuckery in Syria’s southeast isn’t just about stealing Syrian oil. It’s about making sure the Iraqi oil goes through the rebuilt Haifa pipeline, and making sure Syria can’t rebuild or use the Tripoli pipeline instead. Once one is rebuilt, the other isn’t really economical any more.”

Posted by: james | Sep 26 2017 23:40 utc | 158

james @158–
With that last comment by Nauert, the Outlaw US Empire has no basis to argue with Iraq when it goes into Barzaniland to completely restore its sovereignty, nor does it when the same occurs in Syria. The painter has admitted to painting itself into a corner from which there’s no escape.

Posted by: karlof1 | Sep 27 2017 0:35 utc | 159

barbarians — they are following US Russia nd Israel for power and few interests —–

Posted by: MAHADI khan | Sep 27 2017 1:29 utc | 160

>>>> Christian Chuba | Sep 25, 2017 10:07:10 AM | 47

@Ghostship, according to this map, I thought that the big battle was around Khan Shaykhun

Maybe, but the AMN article was specific about Haritan and Google Maps takes you to Hraytan just north west of Aleppo. Seems like some HTS associates wanted to fight someone.
Actually, it looks like the big battle is all over the occupied area in Idlib. There have been reports that the SAA is looking to relieve the besieged zone around Al-Fu’ah and Kafarya north-north-east of Idlib city.
This map shows today’s reports of bombing raids and the Russians seem to be bombing the shit out the jihadists across Idlib and the neighbouring Governorates.
It seems that the recent reports of Russian aircraft arriving in Syria wasn’t a rotation but a surge as there have been 1,100+ strikes in the last 6 days according to a report yesterday

Posted by: Ghostship | Sep 27 2017 1:43 utc | 161

>>>> Stumpy | Sep 26, 2017 3:34:17 AM | 127

The publication of Russian aerial intel on US vehicles in enemy positions reminded me of the Kennedy showing imagery of missile sites in Cuba.

Contrary to the Washington narrative of the Cuban missile crisis, the Russians wanted the Americans to see what they were up to as the missiles were not intended to go active, they were bargaining chips to negotiate the removal of Jupiter missiles from Turkey. That the Soviet Union suckered the United States doesn’t sit well with its exceptionalism, and that the prime cause of the crisis was the Jupiter missiles in Turkey doesn’t sit well with its need to always be seen as the victim.

Posted by: Ghostship | Sep 27 2017 1:55 utc | 162

re 102 CarlID
“Any particular reason you write Asad instead of Assad?”
Because it’s the correct transcription of the Arabic. In Asad’s case, the family name means ‘lion’. Actually Al-Asad, which probably means ‘family of the lion’. Assad usually represents a version of As’ad (happiest or luckiest), as in the case of the Angry Arab blogger, As’ad Abu Khalil.

Posted by: Laguerre | Sep 27 2017 11:18 utc | 163

>>>> Christian Chuba | Sep 25, 2017 10:07:10 AM | 47

Regarding the death of the Russian General, I’m going to play Devil’s Advocate.
Is it possible that ISIS had some spotters left at Deir Ezzor in the civilian population and noticed a high priority target? All it takes is a cell phone and GPS coordinates, just asking.

I suspect you don’t even need the spotter any more. Two photographs from smartphones that include in the metadata the GPS positions of the camera(s) and the direction the camera(s) is/are pointed in would give you an accurate enough location for a barrage and a third photograph with the same information could well give you the location accurate enough to destroy it with a couple of rounds. The source of those pictures, anybody in the neighbourhood and if you’re intercepting mobile phone traffic, it doesn’t even have to be a member or supporter of ISIS/whoever. What could be more innocent than someone taking a selfie?
I don’t have a smartphone myself, so I don’t know for sure.

Posted by: Ghostship | Sep 27 2017 12:08 utc | 164

A senior Russian senator and deputy head of the defense committee told Russian media yesterday that there is an investigation under way…and that ‘treachery’ is involved…

‘There is precise data that it was a treachery… [We] are searching for traitors and they will be found soon,’ RIA quoted Klintsevich as saying…

General Asapov was photographed right at the Euphrates river prior to the deadly strike and Southfront has those pictures also…
It would not have been anything like somebody taking innocent selfies…nobody is allowed to take pictures or even carry cell phones in close proximity to a general on the front lines…or even just on the front lines in general…
This was a rat of some sort and they are working on finding him…
Others have mentioned US surveillance drones…this is completely far-fetched…Russian air defense radars know exactly what kind of aircraft are flying and where at any given time over pretty much all of Syria’s airspace…and certainly at the Deir Ezzor frontline…
Any US aircraft, including drones, would have to file flight plans with the Russians according to the deconfliction rules…
In any case a drone could not have the resolution to identify people on the ground…it could make out that they are people, but that’s about it…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 27 2017 13:01 utc | 165

Meanwhile Russia makes a new agreement with the US for a moon space station.

Posted by: Perimtr | Sep 27 2017 13:14 utc | 166

@158
Very interesting the airhead Nauert who basically ssays nothing of substance, does in fact say Erdogan’s statement ‘sounds like a threat’…
I think there is a much deeper split between the US and Turkey than people may realize…and it has all happened very fast…
Here is what Erdogan said about the Iraqi Kurds, as rported by Sputnik…

‘Who supported the referendum, who recognized the results? Israel alone did. Kosovo was recognized by scores of countries and it still could not become a state. What would Israel’s recognition do? … As soon as we start imposing sanctions, close the oil valve, it will be the end. All income would cease. As soon as lorries stop going to northern Iraq, there will be nothing to eat there. How will Israel supply anything there? Please, it can try…’

So Erdogan clearly is not fooled by the good cop, bad cop shtick that Uncle Scam is pulling with sidekick Israel…the mealy-mouthed US rejections of Iraqi Kurdistan independence are so much BS and everyone knows it…
that’s the trouble with being a conman…sooner or later everyone knows you’re a backstabber and people just start avoiding you…
Just a few years ago Turkey, Israel, and the US were all on the same team…pulling together to pull down Syria…the it became clear to Erdo that the ziocon project for the middle east included slicing off Turkey’s Kurdistan as well…
Now he’s busy installing Russian S400s, Russian gas pipelines and clearly in the US/EU doghouse…
Who will be next to flip…KSA…?
those same ziocon maps of a retooled ME show the Saudi kingdom chopped into several statelets also…

Posted by: flankerbandit | Sep 27 2017 13:15 utc | 167

A little warning from Russia with love?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-27/mattis-targeted-taliban-rocket-attack-afghan-airport

Posted by: alaric | Sep 27 2017 14:35 utc | 168

Re: 169
Doubt it.
Would have been better timed.

Posted by: CarlD | Sep 27 2017 14:47 utc | 169

Re: 170.
“Would have been better timed.”
Most people send a warning by intentionally missing. Too close might be too close. In any case Afghanistan is the perfect place for Russia to respond to US/deep state stupidity especially now that dumbo (trump) is sending a lot of new targets to the country. The Taliban might not be so found of their Saudi sponsors (former) now that they are fighting ISIS in Afghanistan too.

Posted by: Alaric | Sep 27 2017 19:46 utc | 170

Awesome posts, b and everybody. It’s good to keep up with what’s going on since the MSM either does not inform or misinforms.
Terscich 120
That’s the pattern. I’m glad so many recognize it since it repeats so much.
michaelj72 122
I finished All the Kremlin’s Men and am almost finished with the Cox Report where the GOP congress lambasted Gore (Clinton) in 1999 for colluding with Chernomyrdin and the oligarchs. It’s a farcical polemic but it did include Russian government statements about mistrust of US unilateral actions. This was in the late 1990s. And Bush/Obama have only made things worse.
MSM today/tonight had the celebrations in Kurdistan. I think it was DW that mentioned that Israel was happy with this, too. MSM creates context for everything else but not this (the desire of Israel – and US – to divide their neighbors)?

Posted by: Curtis | Sep 27 2017 23:22 utc | 171

“The U.S. and its coalition partners carried out more than 5,000 airstrikes in Syria and Iraq combined in August. That’s the highest monthly figure since the air campaign began three years ago.”
http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/09/29/553735509/the-u-s-is-beating-back-isis-so-what-comes-next
Up to 5k air strikes per month. That’s a lot of bombs and destruction. And for what? But NPR (part of MSM) does not ask how it was started or what was the goal of the original players. It plays the tilted agenda of accusing Trump of not having a plan. They demand a political solution. What kind ar they looking for? One in which Assad is gone and the islamists win? A divided and much weaker Syria with no ties to Iran?

Posted by: Curtis | Sep 29 2017 13:16 utc | 172

American Putinist in service to Russia’s Troll Army and clear America hater. FBI should put you on a watch list as your political loyalties clearly don’t like with America.

Posted by: Ernest Allen | Sep 29 2017 13:51 utc | 173

Fuck off, Ernest All.

Posted by: Perimtr | Sep 30 2017 7:46 utc | 174