Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
March 23, 2017
Syria Summary – The U.S. Move On Tabqa Will Complicate The Political Situation

Turkey is at a dead end in Syria. Erdogan's dream of going on to Raqqa and Deir Ezzor  or even Aleppo city has been blocked by an agreement between the U.S. and Russia. His proxy forces are stuck north-east of Aleppo city and have no way to go further south, east or west. They conquered a piece of rural land that gives Erdogan no negotiation leverage but potentially a lot of headaches. A small Russian contingent has moved into the Kurdish enclave in north-west Syria around Afrin blocking any serious Turkish move against that area.

Turkey and its paymasters in Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia have lost the fight over Syria. Still tacitly backed by the U.S. they are currently trying a Hail-Mary pass to again achieve some negotiation power for the next round of Geneva talks. This is likely to again fail. Their proxy forces in the north west, including al-Qaeda, moved from the north towards the city of Hama (see map, red=Syrian government). Over the last days they captured 11 small villages which were only lightly defended. The Russian and Syrian airforce are now devastating them and a counter-attack by the Syrian army is prepared and will soon throw them back.


Source: Islamic World Newsbigger

Coordinated with the Hama attack was an attempt to capture ground on the eastern periphery of Damascus and in the south around Deraa. The Damascus attack has run its cause. No ground was taken and held by the Takfiris and the counterattack against them is advancing. The attack in Deraa failed to break the Syrian army defense lines.

The head of the "White Helmet" propaganda gang in south Deraa was killed in an IED attack by al-Qaeda aligned forces. He was no Samaritan. He also commanded the 18 March Division, part of the foreign paid insurgency against the Syrian state.

The large Syrian army move on Idleb governate to liberate it from the Takfiris is still in preparation. No date has been set for its launch.

East of Aleppo city the Syrian army had blocked all Turkish proxy advances. It continued south to retake the country side from the Islamic State and is making good progress. The biggest city in the area, Deir Hafar, was nearly surrounded today by the Syrian army when the Islamic State fighters suddenly moved out. It is now back in government hands. [The sources were wrong on this. Deir Hafar is effectively surrounded but not yet in government hands. – Mar 23 1110 pm] The Syrian army in the area will continue to move south and south-east towards Raqqa and Deir Ezzor.

The U.S. proxy force in north-east Syria, the Kurdish anarcho-marxists of the PKK/YPK, have advanced on Raqqa. Raqqa lies slightly north of the Euphrates. The only way south and west from Raqqa that was left open was across the Tabqa dam that dams up the Euphrates and creates the Assad lake.


Source: Syrian Generationbigger

Yesterday the U.S. and its proxy forces started a surprise attack to take the dam (map). Helicopters transported YPG fighters to the south of the Euphrates and improvised ferries (vid) carried their heavy equipment across the lake. Apache helicopters and heavy U.S. artillery covered the move. They blocked the road between Raqqa towards Aleppo in the west and they are now moving towards Tabqa city directly south of the dam. At the same time a YPG/PPK force is moving from the north towards the dam. There is some fear that Islamic State fighters could blow up the dam but the first to drown in the following flood would be all Isis fighters and their families in Raqqa and beyond.

In areas further south and east there is some fighting between the Syrian army and ISIS groups around Palmyra and in Deir Ezzor. The situations there seem mostly stable with slight advances by the Syrian government forces.

Israel recently made some splash by bombing Syrian government forces near Palmyra. This was against certain parameters the Russian and Israeli governments had agreed upon. While Russia will not hinder Israeli attacks on Hizbullah weapon transports going to Lebanon it will interdict should Israel (again) hit any forces in Syria fighting ISIS or other Jihadis. Israel was warned off by a Syrian anti-air missile launch. Loud noise was made thereafter by the Netanyahoo government in Tel Aviv. But that is mere domestic grandstanding. Netanyahoo is under criminal investigation and is fighting for his political life.

It is still unclear how the Trump administration plans to proceed on Syria. The move south of the Euphrates may block the Syrian government forces from moving further east towards the enclave in Deir Ezzor which is still under siege by ISIS. But the Euphrates crossing may also be a purely military move without a political intent to simply to enable the taking of the Tabqa dam. As a military move it makes completely sense. If this is a political move it will complicate the already confusing situation.

Comments

Peter AU | Mar 24, 2017 9:16:25 Yes indeed.
Not sure why Syria wasn’t bombing the bunkers while they were being built ?
Maybe that’s why the Patriot batteries were placed in Turkey ?

Posted by: ProPeace | Mar 25 2017 2:18 utc | 101

BTW see “Israel’s secret “Doomsday” Nuke base revealed by US” article from June 2013

Posted by: ProPeace | Mar 25 2017 2:32 utc | 102

@87 h
haven’t read the remarks of tee-rex and abadi yet, but i note the composition of
The 68 members of the The Global Coalition Working to Defeat ISIS
in the americas … the us, canada, and panama
in the middle east … iran is absent, lebanon and iraq are not … followed by isis’ funders and supporters …
– Bahrain
– Jordan
– Kuwait
– Oman
– Qatar
– Saudi Arabia
– United Arab Emirates
… don’t actually know about oman
in asia pacific … the occupied and vassals
– Afghanistan
– Australia
– Japan
– Malaysia
– New Zealand
– Singapore
– South Korea
– Taiwan
and in europe … no russia!
what a sick joke this is. another coalition of rogue, criminal states and those made an offer they couldn’t refuse.

Posted by: jfl | Mar 25 2017 2:54 utc | 103

@103
Remarks at the Ministerial Plenary for the Global Coalition Working to Defeat ISIS
tee rex :

1) … the flow of foreign terrorist fighters into Syria and Iraq is down 90 percent over the past year …
2) Turkey has pushed ISIS off the Turkey-Syria border through Operation Euphrates Shield. …
3) … defeating ISIS is the United States number one goal in the region. … As we stabilize areas encompassing ISIS’s physical caliphates in Iraq and Syria, we also must prevent their seeds of hatred from taking root elsewhere. … Already we are seeing ISIS-linked cells from the Pacific Rim to Central Asia to South America. … In order to stay ahead of a global outbreak, we must all adopt the following countermeasures:
a) First, continue to persist with in-country counterterrorism and law enforcement operations. …
b) Second, we need greater intelligence and information sharing within our own domestic intelligence agencies and among our nations. …
c) We also must look this enemy’s ideology in the eyes for what it is: a warped interpretation of Islam that threatens all of our people. … Muslim partners and leaders of their faith must combat this perverse ideological message. …
d) Lastly … we must break ISIS’s ability to spread its message and recruit new followers online. … A “digital caliphate” must not flourish in the place of a physical one. … We all should deepen cooperation with the tech industry to prevent encrypted technologies from serving as tools that enable extremist collaboration. … we thank those companies which are already responding to this challenge. We must capitalize on the extraordinary advancements in data analytics and algorithmic technologies to build tools that discover ISIS’s propaganda and identify imminent attacks. Researchers in the United States are already developing tools for sweeping the dark corners of the internet for ISIS material …

1. and 2. are bald assertions. i don’t believe either one. i suppose one could argue that turkey’s terroists are not isis … in fact there’s not a mention of hts – Hay’at Tahrir al Sham, isis redux – in these remarks.
3. this is the message : the gwot will continue, worldwide … with special emphasis on the further development and unification of the nsa-google-facebook-twitter-cia dragnet.
pm abadi:

1) This is a terrorist group. It cannot be trusted. We cannot deal with it, it’s organizing, killing, and chaos and destruction; a very corrupted ideology. There is no humanity to the US, and today is trying to oppress the human being in our modern world. [oops, mistyped. that’s ISIS in place of US] …
2) We have a local council in every governorate and we have a governor who is elected … Decentralization strengthens Iraq … We are committed to that and we cannot ever go back on that …
3) Over the past two and a half years, despite the terrorism of Daesh and ISIS, Iraq was able to increase its oil production. Today, Iraq can provide over 5 million barrels a day. Despite the harsh cost of the war and the destruction of the war …
4) And I will also say that the structure in Samarra and that the tower that also saw the Mongol and the other occupations and remained resistant and with Daesh was destroyed. That shows the extent of the destruction that these terrorist groups have caused to the ziggurats and other historic monuments. …
5) … for the first time in the history of Iraq fighting side by side … with the Peshmergas … it is the relationship between the Iraqi army and the Peshmerga has been sound and excellent, and there is a great deal of cooperation and understanding. …
6) Also, we had the law on the PMF [People’s Mobilization Forces] … The PMF accordingly is under the general commander of the armed forces, and that is the prime minister. … we have the elections coming up. It must not … also, other political groups who hold up weapons must not also enter into the elections. We must separate the weapon from the political effort and the political track, and no weapon must be outside the scope of the government. …
7) Terrorism is exploiting the injustice that is happening in the region … where there are regions that are suffering from void, terrorism will exploit. … I call on containing the regional differences and the regional conflicts, because these are the main … reasons to seeing these groups rise that’s in Syria and Libya and other places …
8) … we fight side by side on the ground, and we benefit from all the logistical support and all the air support that is being given to us and to our forces as we move forward to the next phase to protect our borders and rebuild our countries – our country.
9) I can’t pretend that we have resolved all of our issues, but these problems go back to many years in the past when Saddam and the Baath regime oppressed the Iraqi people and fought many wars in the region, and destroyed the means of the Iraqi people until 2003 …

1. yes
2. some form of ‘federalization’ will come about in iraq, as in syria? if so which of the poles of that axis will dominate in iraq?
3. see, the tncs said they could destroy the middle east and still meet their production goals … and they were right. they can.
4. see 1, above. who destroyed iraq, destroyed afghanistan, destroyed libya, destroyed ukraine, destroyed syria?
5. see 2 above, and consider which end of the federalization axis has settled into kurdistan.
6. will the shia assert themselves and push the us out of iraq?
7. ‘containing regional differences’ sounds ominous, which end of the federalization axis is ‘containment’?
8. the us is our friend … are you kidding me?
9. everything’s been trending up since the us invaded, destroyed, and occupied iraq in 2003. right.

Posted by: jfl | Mar 25 2017 5:18 utc | 104

@ jfl with comments 103, 104
You are leaving out China and India, for example, from your geopolitical equations.
I think that new multi-polar alliances are forming and the playing field could look quite different a year from now…..change is a constant but the pace of it can vary.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Mar 25 2017 5:28 utc | 105

@105
i think china and india have very little to do with syria. they’re both very interested in saudi arabia and the rest of the big-time oil and gas producers in the gcc, but syria … they’ll leave it to the russians, iranians and hezbollah. there’s nothing in it for them, as far as they can see.

Posted by: jfl | Mar 25 2017 6:25 utc | 106

Iraq wants fewer US troops on territory after Mosul, says PM

BAGHDAD – Iraq wants fewer US forces on its territory now that the Islamic State (IS) group is close to defeat in Mosul, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi told Middle East Eye.
He used his regular weekly news conference to set out his stall for Donald Trump, on the eve of becoming the first Arab leader to visit the US president in Washington next week.
Asked by MEE whether he favoured a reduction in US troops, the Iraqi leader said: “As we are crushing Daesh [IS], it is clear that there is a need to reduce the number of our allies who are helping us.”
He pointed out that it was his predecessor, Nouri al-Maliki, who had asked US forces to return after IS captured Mosul, the capital of Nineveh province, in June 2014.
“What this government has done has been to internationalise the fight against terrorism. We have expanded it, made it more robust,” he said.
“We have taken on board many countries that wanted to help Iraq as well. The number of forces increased and reached a peak in the battle of Nineveh, especially in the west of Nineveh at the moment.
“After this operation the number is going to be reduced.”
According to Sajad Jiyad, the director of the al-Bayan Centre for Planning and Studies think-tank, the Iraqi government is not willing to let Trump use its territory against Iran, but is willing to let the US use it against IS in Syria.
“US special forces already cross into Syria. Last week there was an Iraqi air strike inside Syria [against IS],” he said.
“The prime minister said he had spoken to the Syrian government and got permission to operate by land and air in Syria.”
He hinted that the US would be allowed to expand its operations against IS in Syria without formally needing Syrian clearance if it was done through the Iraqis.
Jiyad acknowledged that Trump sounded more hostile towards Iran than Obama was, but Iraq would resist that.
“We want to press the US to push the Gulf states and Saudi Arabia to be less aggressive towards Iran.
“The Saudis saw Trump win the election and they feel he wants Iraq to be on the side of their alliance rather than on the Iranian side.
“But Abadi is balanced. He doesn’t want Iraq to be anti-Iran or anti-Saudi, the same as he is with Turkey, neither anti or pro.”

US Defense Secretary Mattis: US will stay in Iraq a while

BAGHDAD — U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said Monday he believes U.S. forces will be in Iraq and in the fight against Islamic State militants for a while, despite some rocky times between the two nations.
Speaking at the end of a day of meetings in Baghdad with military commanders and Iraqi political leaders, Mattis said he is open to any request from his military commanders to aid the battle to retake Mosul and launch a major battle to oust IS from the base of its so-called caliphate in Raqqa, Syria. He would not provide details.
He [mattis] said there’s no doubt that “the Iraqi people, the Iraqi military and the Iraqi political leadership recognize what they’re up against and the value of the coalition and the partnership, in particular with the United States.”
Townsend, who was standing by Mattis, declined to say how long the U.S. will stay in Iraq. But, he said, “I don’t anticipate that we’ll be asked to leave by the government of Iraq immediately after Mosul.” He added, “I think that the government of Iraq realizes their very complex fight, and they’re going to need the assistance of the coalition even beyond Mosul.”
There are more than 5,100 U.S. military personnel in Iraq, and up to about 500 in Syria.

i guess the us plans were explained to abadi before he offered his remarks to the coalition for drilling. i think abadi says the things he does, about fewer us troops for instance, for internal consumption. he’s a ‘made man’ of the ‘coalition’. he’s a capo, no more. salutes, follows orders, lines his pockets. like karlof, i hope that the Sadristas can rise to power in iraq. they seem to be the only ones who can throw the americans out. the poor iraqis have been directly under the us bootheel for more than a quarter century.

Posted by: jfl | Mar 25 2017 6:38 utc | 107

@ jfl 106
Everything must be taken into account. Ukraine, Syria, are tactical battles in this game of geo-political warfare. China have immense soft power that will keep growing as their economy grows.
Hindutva India with 1.3 billion population is an extremely powerful tool for the US.
psychohistorian 105 Look closely at Hindutva India.

Posted by: Peter AU | Mar 25 2017 6:47 utc | 108

jfl ‘made man’ of the ‘coalition
That covers it.
Back in the times of “40.000 Yazies trapped on a hill” / ISIS snuff movie era,US would not help out until Iraq had a head honcho of their choice.

Posted by: Peter AU | Mar 25 2017 6:58 utc | 109

“Russia is an inalienable and organic part of Greater Europe and European civilization. Our citizens think of themselves as Europeans…That’s why Russia proposes moving towards the creation of a common economic space from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean, a community referred to by Russian experts as ‘the Union of Europe’ which will strengthen Russia’s potential in its economic pivot toward the ‘new Asia.’” — Russian President Vladimir Putin, “Russia and the changing world”, February 2012
Mike Whitney’s “Will Washington Risk WW3 to Block an Emerging EU-Russia Superstate”http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03/23/will-washington-risk-ww3-to-block-an-emerging-eu-russia-superstate/

Posted by: h | Mar 25 2017 13:11 utc | 110

@108 p au
well yeah, there’s always the butterfly effect. but in point of fact it looks to me as though neither india nor china is concerning itself with syria. bigger fish to fry. they’ve hung the syrians out to dry.

Posted by: jfl | Mar 25 2017 14:27 utc | 111

@111
i remember being encouraged when xi said a few weeks back that there must be a two-state solution in palestine. then last week it was ‘win-win’ with bibi and new trade deals and collaborative weapons research … no flies on xi, he can talk sh*t with the rest of ’em.

Posted by: jfl | Mar 25 2017 14:31 utc | 112

“the Kurdish anarcho-marxists of the PKK/YPK”
either you are Anarchist or Marxist, now way to be both.
What is about libertarian Socialism?

Posted by: Mats | Mar 25 2017 16:33 utc | 113

SDF already at Tabqa airbase. Clashes ongoing..
https://southfront.org/sdf-entered-strategic-tabqa-air-base-west-of-raqqah/

Posted by: Lozion | Mar 25 2017 23:33 utc | 114