Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
December 12, 2016
Syria Roundup: Government Liberates Aleppo – In Revenge(?) ISIS Retakes Palmyra

The assault by Syrian government forces and its allies on Takfiri forces in east-Aleppo continues. Yesterday the heavily fortified Sheikh Saeed quarter was taken in addition to Karam Da`da`, Ferdous, Bab al Maqam and Jallum. The al-Qaeda led terrorists are down to some 5 square kilometer, five city quarters, roughly 2% of the area they held when the siege on them started. They may give up today or tomorrow. Huge amounts of foreign ammunition, food and medicines were found in the quarters the Takfiris retreated from.

bigger

The U.S. has given up on any relief mission for them. U.S. Secretary of State Kerry is down to begging the Russians to let some of his friends escape: Kerry urges Russia to ‘show a little grace’ and allow Aleppo evacuation.

Winning back the economic capital of the country, a city which the Turkish wannabe-Sultan Erdogan wanted to capture and incorporate into his neo-Ottoman empire, is the biggest victory the Syrian government achieved in this war. The whole area retaken in and around Aleppo is some 18,000 square kilometers – that is a larger area than the whole countries of Qatar or Lebanon.

There were discussions between Syria and its allies from Russia, Iran and Lebanon on how to proceed from here. It was decided to set a priority in the west towards the al-Qaeda occupied Idleb instead of the mostly ISIS occupied east-Syria. A two front war in the west and east would be too risky and require additional forces that are not (yet) available. Two reasons for this decision are the economic importance of Idleb governate and the continuity of the government held western part of "useful Syria". There are other forces, Turkish, Kurdish and some Arab U.S. proxies, that have declared war on ISIS and shall bleed to eradicate it in the east.

Accordingly a tacit deal was found with Turkey. It would be allowed to take al-Bab, east of Aleppo and to march on towards Raqqa from there. In exchange it would refrain from supporting al-Qaeda and aligned forces in and around Idleb in the west. Those forces would still have clandestine support from the U.S., Saudi Arabia, Qatar and others. It is somewhat questionable if the rather unreliable Erdogan will stick to the deal but that risk has been taken.

The general risk of setting the priority in the west is a festering of a U.S. occupation of Syria's east. The U.S. just deployed an additional 200 special forces there to bring the total up to acknowledged 500. There are also some French and other special forces in the area. They are building several small military airfields and hire anyone they can find in that area to, allegedly, fight ISIS. This looks much like the construction of a "Salafist principality" in east-Syria and west-Iraq without the ISIS label. Gulf countries' and Zionists' lobbyists have called for such an occupation strategy of Upper Mesopotamia. A U.S./Saudi controlled proxy entity that interrupts the "Shia crescent" from Iran over Iraq and Syria to Lebanon and holds the ground for a planned natural gas pipeline from Qatar to Turkey and onto Europe.

The Russian and Syrian hope may be that a Trump administration will abandon such imperial nonsense.

Since December 5 probing attacks of ISIS around the larger area of east-Homs governate and Palmyra were registered. But the priority of the Syrian government was, rightly so, on east-Aleppo. Palmyra was held by a Syrian army contingent in large company size and by a few companies of little trained National Defense Forces – way too few to defend a rather large area against a sizable and determined attack.

Last Friday ISIS attacked Palmyra with several hundred fighters, heavy artillery and tanks. Multiple suicide Vehicle Based IEDs penetrated the NDF defense lines around Palmyra. A large ISIS attack on Saturday was repulsed by over 60 Russian air attacks. Major news agencies falsely reported that ISIS had taken the center of Palmyra based solely on "activists in Turkey" claims. Only a renewed ISIS attack on Sunday proved to be too much for the thin defense forces. At noon the decision was taken to avoid further losses and to retreat from the city towards the south and the west. Palmyra and the surrounding areas fell again to ISIS.

The attackers are thought to have come from Deir Ezzor, where a Syrian government force surrounded by ISIS recently had a few quiet days. Some may also have come from Raqqa where a recent halt in U.S. commanded attacks gave ISIS some relief. The fighters most likely did not recently come from Mosul in Iraq. Several military observers said the attackers were superbly organized, well led and had excellent intelligence.

Reinforcements for the Syrian army have arrived in the area and the Russian deputy foreign minister promised to retake the city from ISIS. The reinforcements may be enough to stop the current ISIS advance. But the priority is Aleppo and an immediate successful counterattack on Palmyra is not likely.

How does this ISIS attack fit into the bigger picture?

Map by Fabrice Balanche – Status November 2016 – Palmyra is below the lower center-left of the map frame – bigger

ISIS is under attack in Iraq in Mosul and the areas west of it. U.S. proxy forces, mostly Kurdish YPG fighters, attack the surroundings of the ISIS held city of Raqqa. Turkish proxy forces, including some units from the terrorist group Ahrar al-Sham, attack ISIS in al-Bab north-west of Raqqa and east of Aleppo. U.S. drones and attack planes are constantly flying over all ISIS held territory in east-Syria.

How come ISIS has the considerable resources available to now attack Palmyra, far away from the critical points further north where it is heavily attacked? Where did the necessary ammunition and money come from? Why attack now?

U.S. Central Command, the imperial headquarter in the Middle East, announced on December 9 that it had just bombed 168 ISIS tanker trucks near Palmyra. (CentCom is huge. There are 58,000 U.S. troops plus 42,000 U.S. military contractors under CentCom command in the Middle East.) That CentCom claim sounded very dubious to me and I was not the only one to disregard it as nonsense:

The Inside Source – @InsideSourceInt
> #Syria // #Palmyra // US claims of destroying 160 ISIS oil trucks in Syria are seemingly false from what we've heard.
3:46 AM – 10 Dec 2016

The video accompanying the CentCom claim showed bomb hits on only three tanker trucks and some four fixed targets. Nothing like the claimed large scale attack. It is questionable that so many tanker trucks, most were bombed over the last year, would assemble in one area. And why would they be near the then front line with Syrian forces in Palmyra? Why would the U.S. hit them there and not on their way coming or going to wherever? How come no one else, no opposition outlet and no agency, reported such a large attack?

This emphasis on "look we are hitting ISIS around Palmyra" by CentCom is suspicious. The U.S. did see tanker trucks but the hundreds of ISIS forces with heavy equipment, including tanks, preparing for their assault on the city were invisible? This under an airspace that is practically controlled by the U.S. and its allies?

This smells of a "revenge" attack ordered up by the U.S. or its Gulf allies for the Syrian and Russian taking of Aleppo. A demonstration that the early victory of Russia in Palmyra was ephemeral. A propaganda defeat of Russia covering the real defeat of U.S. supported Takfiris in east-Aleppo.

Comments

jfl | Dec 14, 2016 5:09:27 AM | 100
My view on ISIS FWIW is that it wasn’t created by the US but the US is happy to have it around providing it’s in Syria to assist in regime change. It’s more a Qatari/Saudi anti-Shia crescent thing.
At the moment, sst seems to believe this attack was organic – someone in ISIS realised that they had an opportunity to take Palmyra at low cost so the local forces (about 700 strong) just did it. I’m not so sure, the size of the force is unclear and until there are accurate figures it’s difficult to understand what this is about.
If you take the figures supplied by AMN and accept them as correct, ISIS started the attack with 700 fighters, air and other action killed 300 of those around the first attack so that leaves about 400 for the second attack which suggests that the second attack should have been a failure. However, AMN say that by the second attack, ISIS had 4,000-5,000, so given the circumstances failure was inevitable. (Properly trained and equipped regular troops carefully dug in with decent CAS should have been able to kill the lot but the poorly-trained and equipped militia/troops in Palmyra wouldn’t stand a chance since their fixed defences were shite and Russian CAS needs working on I suspect).
ISIS could not have had 4,300-5,300 near Palmyra withouts the Russian and Syrians knowing about it, so if you believe AMNs figures then about 3,600-4,600 ISIS fighters had to cross the desert from the Euphrates Valley at some point. Once we see the casualty figures at the end, we’ll have a better idea of what happened.
As to where those ISIS fighters came from, I reckon they were already in northern Syria. They’re the ones that disappeared from Jarabulus and Manbij and some come from reserves around Raqqa which aren’t needed at the moment because the SDF/US SF/whoever have gone into hibernation.
Who planned it – not the US, Qatari or Saudi military. The US because when the truth comes out, the next C-in-C might not be happy and that could end a lot of careers. Qatar and Saudi Arabia probably don’t have the skills. So that really leaves the CIA or PMCs, who supplied the plans to the Qatari/Saudi military so that the CIA/PMCs can claim they didn’t have any contacts with ISIS at any point during this operation.
I think Paveway IV is right – it’s about gas infrastructure, there are comments on Twitter suggesting that there is an important gas field between the T4 airbase and al Qauryetayn that ISIS are heading towards. ISIS may regard this as payback for the damage to their own oil facilities.
This needs to be sorted out fairly quickly by the Syrians and Russians and the ISIS forces liquidated. But it might be a cold winter for many in Damascus, etc.

Posted by: Ghostship | Dec 14 2016 15:07 utc | 101

@ jfl / ghostship.. i got banned at ssr some time ago for making a comment that was defined by the host as ‘economic determinist’ crap… pat lang is a fairly intolerant guy as i see it, and unfortunately one is either a sycophant, or a military type, or they are generally given a short leash to comment..
however, i do find some of the commentators insightful, including b who posts his thoughts on some of the threads as well. fb ali and a few others seem to have a good grasp of things given a more international perspective, some of which may be steeped in an understanding of islam which i also think is helpful to understand dynamics in the middle east.. but, they don’t have paveway over there and i would be quite curious to know how pat lang processed his commentary.. pat lang, for lack of a better way of saying it, seems like a military type brat who swore allegiance to the flag and tends to venerate the institutions that represent the usa.. he is ‘old school’ and less inclined to see the usa, in particular the military, as being unscrupulous or turning a blind eye to something when it serves there long term interests… so, the expression of obama that they thought isis would help get rid of assad was a supposed slip up out of obama, but it seems pat lang would never think the us military could be accused of holding to a similar tactic… some of us obviously see it differently!
at any rate, i think paveways interpretation and thought process on this very relevant and it does point back to the usa turning a blind eye to it all..
how else does one explain this special arms waver for the ”’rebels”’ or moderate headchoppers? was that an accident, or is it more of the same ‘regime change’ ideology thru the use of weapons that has come to define the usa and their coterie of scyhophants – uk, israel, saudi arabia, qatar and etc? i agree with you jfl – i see usa as the main problem here and everything they say starting from a place of bullshit unless proven otherwise..
i see ghostship posting over there and thought it would be fun for him to bring these thoughts up! fum to watch the reaction too, lol..

Posted by: james | Dec 14 2016 17:36 utc | 102

kilo verme yolları adlı yazımızda üst sıralara çıkmak için bişiler ypıozzayıflama yöntemleri yazımızda ise insanlara nasıl kilo verebileceklerini zayıflayabileceklerini anlatoyoruz.
göbek nasıl erir yazımızda ise göbek eritme ile ilgili önerilerde bulunarak insanlatın sağlıklı bir şekildr zayıflamalamalaraını sağlammaya çalışıyoruz. Nasıl iyi yapıoz m

Posted by: Bidobi | Dec 15 2016 22:40 utc | 103

101 ghostship, ‘I think Paveway IV is right – it’s about gas infrastructure …’
subsequent events have proven you and paveway correct …
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/01/isis-al-qaeda-and-the-us-airforce-wage-war-on-syrias-public-utilities-.html

Posted by: jfl | Jan 10 2017 10:34 utc | 104

@jfl
Great bump!! Re-reading the concerned posts leaves me wondering whether any NATO craft pimped out in ‘RuAF light blue’ are now in the region.

Posted by: MadMax2 | Jan 10 2017 14:38 utc | 105