Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 11, 2016
Nusra On The Run – Trump Induces First Major Policy Change On Syria

The people loyal to the Syrian government are happy with Donald Trump winning the U.S. election:

At the passport counter, a Syrian officer’s face lit up when he saw an American traveler.

“Congratulations on your new president!” he exclaimed, giving an energetic thumbs up. Mr. Trump, he said, would be “good for Syria.”

The first significant step of the new administration comes while Trump is not even in offices. Obama, selfishly concerned with his historic legacy, suddenly makes a 180 degree turn and starts to implement Trump polices. Lets consider the initial position:

Asked about Aleppo in an October debate with Clinton, Trump said it was a humanitarian disaster but the city had "basically" fallen. Clinton, he said, was talking in favor of rebels without knowing who they were.

The rebels fighting Assad in western Syria include nationalists fighting under the Free Syrian Army banner, some of them trained in a CIA-backed program, and jihadists such as the group formerly known as the al Qaeda-linked Nusra Front.

The Obama administration, through the CIA led by Saudi asset John Brennan, fed weapons, training and billions of dollars to "moderate rebels". These then turned around (vid) and either gave the CIA gifts to al-Qaeda in Syria (aka Jabhat al Nusra) or joined it themselves. The scheme was no secret at all and Russia as well as Syria pointed this out several times. The Russian foreign Minister Lavrov negotiated with the U.S. Secretary of State Kerry who promised to separate the "moderate rebels" from al-Qaeda. But Kerry never delivered. Instead he falsely accuse Russia of committing atrocities that never happened. The CIA kept the upper hand within the Obama administration and continued its nefarious plans.

That changed the day the president-elect Trump set foot into the White House. While Obama met Trump in the oval office, new policies, prepared beforehand, were launched. The policies were held back until after the election and would likely not have been revealed or implemented if Clinton had won.

The U.S. declared that from now on it will fight against al-Qaeda in Syria:

President Obama has ordered the Pentagon to find and kill the leaders of an al-Qaeda-linked group in Syria that the administration had largely ignored until now and that has been at the vanguard of the fight against the Syrian government, U.S. officials said.

That shift is likely to accelerate once President-elect Donald Trump takes office. … possibly in direct cooperation with Moscow.

U.S. officials who opposed the decision to go after al-Nusra’s wider leadership warned that the United States would effectively be doing the Assad government's bidding by weakening a group on the front line of the counter-Assad fight.

Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and other Pentagon leaders initially resisted the idea of devoting more Pentagon surveillance aircraft and armed drones against al-Nusra.


al-Qaeda hears of Clinton's defeat,  haz a sad (illustrative pic)

Ash Carter is, together with John Brennan, the major anti-Russian force in the Obama administration. He is a U.S. weapon industry promoter and the anti-Russia campaign, which helps to sell U.S. weapons to NATO allies in Europe, is largely of his doing. He saw al-Qaeda in Syria as a welcome proxy force against Russia.

But Obama has now shut down that policy. We are not yet sure that this is for good but the above Washington Post account is not the only signal:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action today to disrupt al-Nusrah Front’s military, recruitment, and financing operations. Specifically, OFAC designated four key al-Nusrah Front leaders – Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini, Jamal Husayn Zayniyah, Abdul Jashari, and Ashraf Ahmad Fari al-Allak – pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism.

These designations were taken in coordination with the U.S. Department of State, which today named Jabhat Fath al Sham as an alias of al-Nusrah Front – al-Qa’ida’s affiliate in Syria.

Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini was designated for acting for or on behalf of, and providing support and services to or in support of, al-Nusrah Front.

This is a major change in U.S. policy. Nusra will from now on be on the run not only from Russian and Syrian attacks but also from the intelligence and military capabilities of the United States.

The newly designated Al-Muhaysini, a Saudi cleric, is Nusra's chief ideologue in Syria. Some considered him the new Osama Bin-Laden. Here he is, on the left, arm in arm with chief al-Qaeda in Syria propagandist and "journalist" Hadi Abdullah.


bigger

Hadi Abdullah, friend of the designated al-Qaeda terrorist Muhaysini, just received the 2016 Press Freedom Price from the CIA/Soros financed "regime change" influence operation Reporters Without Borders. Might this mean that Hadi Abdullah is himself a CIA assets? He would not be the first such "journalist" in Syria.

Obama, obviously as a direct consequence of the Trump election, now ordered the Pentagon to wage war on al-Qaeda in Syria just as the Russians do. This after five years of nearly unlimited U.S. support for al-Qaeda and its "moderate" Syrian affiliates. It is not yet know what new orders, if any, Obama gave to the CIA. Will the CIA follow these policies or will it (again) try to counter the Pentagon policies in Syria? It is unusual that the WaPo report above about this new direction includes no commenting voice from the CIA. Why is such missing?

Russia and Syria will welcome the new Obama policies should they come to fruit on the ground. Hillary Clinton had planned and announced to widen the conflict in Syria and with Russia and Iran. Obama would surely not have acted against such policies if she had been elected. But with Trump winning and thereby a new policy on the horizon he now changed course to a direction that will provide "continuity" when Trump takes over.

Not only is Trump kicking a black family out of its longtime limewashed home, he also ends U.S. government support for the disenfranchised Jihadis in Syria and elsewhere. This even months before taking office. He really is the menace we have all been warned about.


bigger

UPDATE:

This interview in today's WSJ confirms that Trump is still in the pro-Syrian/anti-Jihadist camp that is opposed to Obama's original policy:

Donald Trump, in Exclusive Interview, Tells WSJ He Is Willing to Keep Parts of Obama Health Law

He said he got a “beautiful” letter from Russian President Vladimir Putin, adding that a phone call between them is scheduled shortly.

Although he wasn’t specific, Mr. Trump suggested a shift away from what he said was the current Obama administration policy of attempting to find moderate Syrian opposition groups to support in the civil war there. “I’ve had an opposite view of many people regarding Syria,” he said.

He suggested a sharper focus on fighting Islamic State, or ISIS, in Syria, rather than on ousting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. “My attitude was you’re fighting Syria, Syria is fighting ISIS, and you have to get rid of ISIS. Russia is now totally aligned with Syria, and now you have Iran, which is becoming powerful, because of us, is aligned with Syria. … Now we’re backing rebels against Syria, and we have no idea who these people are.”

If the U.S. attacks Mr. Assad, Mr. Trump said, “we end up fighting Russia, fighting Syria.”

Comments

It is unusual that the WaPo report above about this new direction includes no commenting voice from the CIA. Why is such missing?
maybe they didn’t want to spoil the surprise.

Posted by: john | Nov 13 2016 19:39 utc | 201

re 197

When cops begin to escalate their death squad tactics against Black youth,

Ah, a partisan of the counter-revolution.

Posted by: Laguerre | Nov 13 2016 19:57 utc | 202

@ jdmckay 186
>> Clintons and Soros Launch ‘Purple Revolution’ in America
You give them far too much credit.
Trump said a lot of “stuff” that legitimately scares many. Those protests are minor ripples after a tumultuous election.

I wouldn’t call property being damaged, set on fire and people being shot / injured minor ripples !!
Learn how the ‘garchs do their messaging in plain sight.
Funny, Bill and Hillaryous showed up the next day both in purple/black attire. In some cultures purple denotes Royalty. Black is mourning. Soros is fond of color revolutions. Always can be found behind the curtain or at the bottom of the cesspool.

Posted by: likklemore | Nov 13 2016 20:13 utc | 203

LP @197
“Besides, with George Soros backing these riots protesting Trump’s election, we might have an American color revolution before Trump takes office.”
So funny to see all this solidarity with Trump here. When cops begin to escalate their death squad tactics against Black youth, Trump will surely have their back.

No. These anti-Trump protests and rioting are organized by paid activists. See the ads on Craigslist -15$/hr. Thanks to Soros’ $26 million contribution.
ZH did some digging and exposed the USAToday’s write up on November 12. What do you know:
Coincidence that these names- presented as regular citizens in a spontaneous anti-Trump protest -just so happens to show up in the Podesta emails?
Anti-Trump Protests: Proof Of Professional Activist Involvement
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-13/anti-trump-protests-proof-professional-activist-involvement
In a story from November 12, USA Today writes an article to discredit the idea that the professional activist community is involved with organizing anti-Trump protests. They invite you to meet the protesters. USA today presents them as ordinary people. However, WikiLeaks exposes them as experienced protest organizers and activists.[.]
So should we expect that everyone quoted in that article is there out of spontaneous concern? Would a reputable newspaper properly identify its sources, noting if they were known activists and organizers? Let’s meet USA Today’s first protester:
Yong Jung Cho, 26, who organized a candlelight vigil in front of the White House on Wednesday night, said about 2,000 people showed up. “Together, we sang, we cried and we marched” to Trump’s hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue. “In this moment, the protests are showing the people, the country and the world that we are here for each other.”
USA Today presents Yong Jung Cho without any introduction. Is she an average citizen, or an experienced protest coordinator? In a February 2016 email from the Podesta files, Yong Jung Cho is described as “350 Action Campaign Coordinator”.
USA Today presents the protests as spontaneous, involving people from “all walks of life” – certainly not professional protesters. If anyone in the crowd has protest experience, it hasn’t been since the Vietnam Era:
[.]

Posted by: likklemore | Nov 13 2016 20:20 utc | 204

pnyx @ 190 — Clinton got over a million more popular votes.
As your link — the LA Times — shows, there are about 4 million California votes still to count.
Still to count. Clinton doesn’t have anywhere close to a million more yet.
But yes, down the road you could be right if 62% of those go for Clinton, as did the state as a whole.
“You know you never beat us on the battlefield,” U.S. Army Colonel Harry Summers Jr. told his North Vietnamese Army (NVA) counterpart, Colonel Tu, during a meeting in Hanoi a week before the fall of Saigon.
“That may be so,” Tu replied, “but it is also irrelevant.”
Clinton conceded, and as she herself liked to say, “What difference does it make now?”

Posted by: Ken Nari | Nov 13 2016 20:33 utc | 205

re Mina 199

I think they fail to see that a US campaign is just a match of catch wrestling

The election of Trump was a genuine expression of popular revolt. Only the candidate, much as in Britain’s Brexit vote, was not a real representative of the people who voted for him. They will be disappointed.
Let’s hope there will be more address to their problems in the future. As I think they will be in the long term.

Posted by: Laguerre | Nov 13 2016 20:47 utc | 206

#158
It’s ok.
Considering the link was to paedophilia-related porn site, most of the actual clicks were done by CIA, NSA and GCHQ and agents (the “rainbow-minded” GCHQ people, I am looking at you ROOFUS!!) assigned to Moon of Alabama, who are smart enough to click on the links containing gayness (this 2-digit IQ has also made them smart enough to join Western Intelligence Agencies in the first place).
The Western Stazi people who are now even more blackmailable, as if the top end of the scale hasn’t been blown out a long time ago. Meh. In other news, Kim Kardashian has a huge butt.

Posted by: Quadriad | Nov 13 2016 22:14 utc | 207

good news

Posted by: annie | Nov 13 2016 23:29 utc | 208

@Quadriad #209:
In other news, Kim Kardashian has a huge butt.
Not just a butt:
Enough with Hollywood’s Pendulous Boobery (photos at link)
But to get back to the deep state:
The Witch’s Wrath Turns Into A Clintonian Counter-Revolution

The Second American Revolution has succeeded and the American People have beaten The Establishment, but just like the First American Revolution before it, the hardest challenges now lie ahead. Trump needs to unify the unprecedentedly polarized nation and rebuild the socio-economic fabric that the prior class of “politically correct” globalists destroyed, and he also must make good on his campaign promises which inspired Middle America to rally behind him in the first place. Not only that, but he and his movement must repel the Clintonian Counter-Revolution that Hillary, her “deep state” neoconservative backers in the permanent military-intelligence-military bureaucracies, and George Soros’ Color Revolutionary cadre are hatching at this very moment.
Lame duck Obama is collaborating with them and facilitating their disturbances by refusing to deploy the National Guard to deal with their incipient nationwide riots, which will make it all the more difficult for President-elect Trump once he officially enters office early next year.

Posted by: Demian | Nov 13 2016 23:38 utc | 209

#211 Demian
All Trump really needs to do, IMO, is to stop the war of aggression on Syria, the intentional Killarian pro-WW3 escalation against Russia, arrest even a token number (a few thousands rather than millions) illegally immigrated Latino crims (for no other reason than to prove “his original intentions” as honest rather than racially motivated), and bring back some non-minimum wage jobs, one way or another (including scrapping or renegotiating globalist rubbish like TPP).
What Trump might also do is throw Saudi Arabia and Qatar under the bus, if for no greater reason then to preserve Israel’s own outsourcing ties to 9-11. This will be only a partial win in the eyes of many, but he doesn’t have the mandate to effectively end Medinat Yisrael (YET). Someone’d be needing to rehouse millions of Jewish refugees in that case, which alone is a bit of a no-go.
The rest of this is the job of law enforcement agencies including FBI. Treating paid rioters as anything more than ordinary criminals is giving them too much street cred, imo, and Trump will likely know better.

Posted by: Quadriad | Nov 13 2016 23:52 utc | 210

@207 Ken Nari, ‘Clinton conceded, and as she herself liked to say, “What difference does it make now?”‘
As did Al Gore … if anyone one is aware that there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the candidates it’s … the candidates.
Omertà is a code of honor that places importance on silence, non-cooperation with authorities, and non-interference in the illegal actions of others.
The authorities in this case are us, the electorate, the common enemy of ‘both’ sides of the political charade.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 14 2016 0:00 utc | 211

Adam Entous, now with the WaPo, used to write for the WSJ … converted?
I picked up on his article in 2013: Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal strikes again.
Syria chemical weapons sites being dispersed to avoid detection, report says.
http://www.boomantribune.com/comments/2013/8/27/35832/7630/91#91
A Syrian rebels’ propaganda piece …

Posted by: Oui | Nov 14 2016 10:03 utc | 212

jfl at 182.
My meaning @ 180 was simply that Trump Health C proposals if one can call them that, are a mess and not likely to have any favorable outcome (imho.)
Without going into fatiguing minutiae, the defunct Killary proposed plan (when she was First Lady awarded an illgetimate political role) and moreover Romney’s plan (though some say it wasn’t really his and he took over Dem plans, it was called Romney-Care, Mass.) were/are, as seen from a generalist outside perspective, not fundamentally different. All are set in the USA political-financial, corporate for profit model.
Trump is just another same music, same song…
What would Jill Stein do? If she was elected (= hypothetical.)
I think the best thing to do would be to abolish Obamacare and just add everyone to Medicare, since the program already exists and works well. Demian at 191.
Trump said something like that once, but he has said a lot of things…
I am banging on about this issue because US citizens should also concentrate on internal matters, besides the hyped relief of avoiding HRC, WW3, and victoriously dissing the Dems. In a fake duopoly one needs to give up such stances.

Posted by: Noirette | Nov 14 2016 14:19 utc | 213

I’m glad that Moon of Alabama is getting more recognition.
But the downside seems to be that a lot more trolls are assigned to site, too. Makes it hard to find the posts from the old regulars.

Posted by: Perimetr | Nov 14 2016 16:27 utc | 214

Obama is not just in the lame duck phase of his exiting. He has been sidelined, as in by-passed. Get this header in the Mirror.co. UK paper citing RU news agency. Quite in line with Trump’s pledge during the campaign:
Trump and Putin vow to tackle ISIS together as they hold breakthrough talks after billionaire’s election
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/trump-putin-vow-tackle-isis-9259834
The Kremlin said Putin called the president-elect yesterday to begin negotiations over how best to tackle to terrorism.
President-elect Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin have vowed to tackle ISIS together after holding breakthrough talks on the telephone.
Less than a week after the billionaire’s election, the Kremlin said Putin called Trump yesterday to begin negotiations over how best to tackle terrorism.[.]

Posted by: likklemore | Nov 14 2016 21:58 utc | 215

@215 Noirette, ‘I am banging on about this issue because US citizens should also concentrate on internal matters, besides the hyped relief of avoiding HRC, WW3, and victoriously dissing the Dems. In a fake duopoly one needs to give up such stances.’
I have difficulty discovering what you are saying to whom above …
With the Republicans in power across the board ‘internal matters’ are settled, for the next two years. Certainly ‘the hyped relief of avoiding HRC, WW3 …’ is hyped, but avoiding WW3 is the one remaining uncertainty – or the one remaining hook to hang hope on. Hope dies last as they say. I have given up on such stances from a rational point of view, yet still ‘hope’ that, somehow, things are not as bad as they seem. My view of a solution to our problems is not exactly catching on like wildfire. Looks like more of the same to me. Nothing good in the USA. The protests seem reactionary, or worse – staged, to me. If people were serious about change it would be heads down, noses to the grindstone, shoulder to the wheel … not more foolish street theater.
Which is why I am heartened by the events in Moldova and Bulgaria. Something seems to be changing there. Someone outside of Russia talking about the Eurasian Economic Union. Russia getting some traction with her brave assertion: There Is An Alternative.
Maybe Circe is right about Trump being the straw that broke the camel’s back, but I see little practical difference between Trump and Hillary, or Hillary and Obama. And it’s chilling to see people cheering the continued slide, because it will ‘wake people up’ to the need for change. If all that happens is an influx of Democrats to the congress in 2018 … nothing will have happened, again.
I think the wry comparison of Trump and Obama is apt : Trump as the white man’s hopey-changey, and that the only ‘change’ over the past eight years has been for the worse. And that looks likely to continue, short of a move past the duopoly, with people actually effecting change without ‘permission’, bottom up. Americans can have no effect on what this president or congress do, that’s structural, so the thing to do is restructure. I see no other way for ‘change’ to come, nor do I see people proposing concrete steps to effect restructuring. Margaret Kimberly had a post consonant with my views, but it stopped short of what do we actually do to effect change. Third parties are structurally impossible. Killing off he Democratic Party and substituting … what? as the new second party will not do it … if it were even possible … Jill Stein is the only good thing about the Green Party, and she seems to have been grafted on, in my view, the only fruit on a barren tree.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 15 2016 0:00 utc | 216

Suddenly, the dollar is back in fashion.
Donald Trump’s unexpected win in the U.S. presidential election sent the dollar up 2.4% against a basket of 16 major peers to its biggest weekly gain since May 2015, and analysts say the rally likely has further to go.
Investors expect Mr. Trump’s proposals to boost fiscal spending, cut taxes and loosen regulation will bolster economic growth and ultimately prompt the Federal Reserve to step up the pace of short-term interest-rate increases.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-dollar-rally-finds-new-life-under-trump-1479067257

Posted by: From The Hague | Nov 15 2016 0:07 utc | 217

Obama: Trump will not leave NATO

[O]utgoing US President Obama has stated that Trump will remain committed to the NATO alliance

You can believe Obama when he tells you what he’s going to … close Guantanamo, for instance … if you feel compelled to. There’s no reason on earth to believe Obama when he tells you what Donald Trump is going to do. There must be real panic in the MilIC.
Never believe anything until it’s officially been denied?

Posted by: jfl | Nov 15 2016 0:25 utc | 218

@ From the Hague who quoted the WSJ….why would you believe anything coming from that rag?
The financial blogs I go to and comment don’t like me coming around because I ask embarrassing questions like what/where are the fundamentals supporting these changes? I believe that the global plutocrats can and are manipulating the markets to fit their propaganda narratives. They own enough to do so but just don’t want to get stuck holding the bag when the music stops. For the pat few centuries they have controlled the music and stopped it when it was convenient for them to do so. I hope that this time is different but am not holding my breath with any hopium.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Nov 15 2016 1:34 utc | 219

Iran, China sign agreement to boost defense-military cooperation

Iran and China have signed an agreement to boost defense-military cooperation and fight terrorism.

Well … now that the USA and EU are officially on the side of al Qaeda … that’d put Iran and China boosting-military cooperation to fight the US/EU, too, wouldn’t it? Trump ought to be emphasizing that alignment – the US/EU with terrorism and the rest of the world against – in order to gain support for his ending the US’ support of ISIS/al Qaeda/terrorism, not only in Syria, but all over the world.
‘Charismatic’ leader that he is he could take the appeal directly to the people, on TV, right over the heads of the neo-con State Department. He could bring on General Dunford to help him make his pitch. He could usher in a purge of the neo-cons at State and in the Pentagon … let Soros’ troops in his Purple revolution in the streets protest the Twilight of the Neo-cons.
The question is … does he really want to do that? and will Israel let him?

Posted by: jfl | Nov 15 2016 3:25 utc | 220

@ jfl commenting on a China/Iran agreement
There is this news about the China/Turkey relationship:
link: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-11/15/c_135829143.htm
Text:

ANKARA, Nov. 14 (Xinhua) — Visiting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Prime Minister Binali Yildirim here on Monday.
Erdogan said that Turkey attaches great importance to China-Turkey relations and is willing to maintain high-level exchanges to address issues concerning partnership through strategic cooperation.
“I’m pleased to see the consensus reached between Chinese President Xi Jinping and me in our previous meetings being effectively implemented,” he said.
He also agreed to align China’s Belt and Road Initiative with Turkey’s “Middle Corridor” project, push ahead with major cooperation projects such as high speed railway construction and strengthen bilateral cooperation in fields such as tourism, culture and education.
The two countries need to deepen cooperation in security and anti-terrorism and support each other in efforts of safeguarding national sovereignty, security and stability, the president added.
In his meeting with Wang, Yildirim said that frequent high-level mutual visits have played a positive role in boosting bilateral relations between Turkey and China.
He expressed the hope that the two countries could bring their respective potential into full play through joint efforts to step up economic and trade cooperation and accelerate strategic alignment.
The prime minister also pointed out the importance of building high-speed railways as a new Silk Road to promote China-Turkey friendship in the new era.
For his part, Wang said the visit is intended to implement the important consensus reached between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Turkish President Recep Erdogan, launching the mechanism for consultation between the Chinese and Turkish foreign ministers.
The Chinese side attaches great importance to China-Turkey relations and is willing to keep high level dialogues and strategic communication, Wang added.
He also expressed the hope that the two countries could uphold the spirit of the ancient Silk Road and make joint efforts to build the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, in order to make new contributions to promoting national development, revitalizing Eurasia and advancing human civilization.
The two sides should also deepen cooperation in security and anti-terrorism and enhance mutual strategic trust to pave the way for all-round cooperation between the two countries, Wang said.
Wang arrived in Ankara on Sunday at the invitation of his Turkish counterpart Mevlut Cavusoglu.

So who is Turkey really going to listen to? China is currently providing support to Syria so one wonders about all this hedging of economic and security positions in the ME.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Nov 15 2016 7:26 utc | 221

@223 psycho
Seems like more talk on Chinese railroads. It’s a variation on the pipeline theme : just as the GCC would like to build a gas pipeline to Europe, so too would China like to build a pipline – railroad – for its gas – manufactures.
The question seems to me not to be to whom Turkey is going to listen – it makes no difference, Erdogan is going to do whatever he’s inspired to do to further his new-Ottomania – but to be why anyone listens to Erdogan.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 16 2016 2:09 utc | 222

Back on topic …
Obama Tries to Cover Tracks by Ordering a Mop Up of Jabhat al-Nusra Leaders

Should there be an inquiry into the activities of the Obama administration after it’s gone, those terrorist leaders would be able to testify against Obama and his affiliates, that’s why they are being murdered in a hurry now.

Duh! Yeah. How could I have missed it. Makes you start to consider who else might get whacked on the way out, doesn’t it?

Posted by: jfl | Nov 16 2016 2:12 utc | 223

– This won’t go down too well in Saudi Arabia.
– It’s a sign Obama was very well aware of what was going in Syria.

Posted by: Willy2 | Nov 16 2016 18:07 utc | 224

Collapse of Complex Societies by Dr. Joseph Tainter
https://youtu.be/G0R09YzyuCI

Posted by: okie farmer | Nov 17 2016 22:27 utc | 225