Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
November 11, 2016
Nusra On The Run – Trump Induces First Major Policy Change On Syria

The people loyal to the Syrian government are happy with Donald Trump winning the U.S. election:

At the passport counter, a Syrian officer’s face lit up when he saw an American traveler.

“Congratulations on your new president!” he exclaimed, giving an energetic thumbs up. Mr. Trump, he said, would be “good for Syria.”

The first significant step of the new administration comes while Trump is not even in offices. Obama, selfishly concerned with his historic legacy, suddenly makes a 180 degree turn and starts to implement Trump polices. Lets consider the initial position:

Asked about Aleppo in an October debate with Clinton, Trump said it was a humanitarian disaster but the city had "basically" fallen. Clinton, he said, was talking in favor of rebels without knowing who they were.

The rebels fighting Assad in western Syria include nationalists fighting under the Free Syrian Army banner, some of them trained in a CIA-backed program, and jihadists such as the group formerly known as the al Qaeda-linked Nusra Front.

The Obama administration, through the CIA led by Saudi asset John Brennan, fed weapons, training and billions of dollars to "moderate rebels". These then turned around (vid) and either gave the CIA gifts to al-Qaeda in Syria (aka Jabhat al Nusra) or joined it themselves. The scheme was no secret at all and Russia as well as Syria pointed this out several times. The Russian foreign Minister Lavrov negotiated with the U.S. Secretary of State Kerry who promised to separate the "moderate rebels" from al-Qaeda. But Kerry never delivered. Instead he falsely accuse Russia of committing atrocities that never happened. The CIA kept the upper hand within the Obama administration and continued its nefarious plans.

That changed the day the president-elect Trump set foot into the White House. While Obama met Trump in the oval office, new policies, prepared beforehand, were launched. The policies were held back until after the election and would likely not have been revealed or implemented if Clinton had won.

The U.S. declared that from now on it will fight against al-Qaeda in Syria:

President Obama has ordered the Pentagon to find and kill the leaders of an al-Qaeda-linked group in Syria that the administration had largely ignored until now and that has been at the vanguard of the fight against the Syrian government, U.S. officials said.

That shift is likely to accelerate once President-elect Donald Trump takes office. … possibly in direct cooperation with Moscow.

U.S. officials who opposed the decision to go after al-Nusra’s wider leadership warned that the United States would effectively be doing the Assad government's bidding by weakening a group on the front line of the counter-Assad fight.

Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and other Pentagon leaders initially resisted the idea of devoting more Pentagon surveillance aircraft and armed drones against al-Nusra.


al-Qaeda hears of Clinton's defeat,  haz a sad (illustrative pic)

Ash Carter is, together with John Brennan, the major anti-Russian force in the Obama administration. He is a U.S. weapon industry promoter and the anti-Russia campaign, which helps to sell U.S. weapons to NATO allies in Europe, is largely of his doing. He saw al-Qaeda in Syria as a welcome proxy force against Russia.

But Obama has now shut down that policy. We are not yet sure that this is for good but the above Washington Post account is not the only signal:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action today to disrupt al-Nusrah Front’s military, recruitment, and financing operations. Specifically, OFAC designated four key al-Nusrah Front leaders – Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini, Jamal Husayn Zayniyah, Abdul Jashari, and Ashraf Ahmad Fari al-Allak – pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism.

These designations were taken in coordination with the U.S. Department of State, which today named Jabhat Fath al Sham as an alias of al-Nusrah Front – al-Qa’ida’s affiliate in Syria.

Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini was designated for acting for or on behalf of, and providing support and services to or in support of, al-Nusrah Front.

This is a major change in U.S. policy. Nusra will from now on be on the run not only from Russian and Syrian attacks but also from the intelligence and military capabilities of the United States.

The newly designated Al-Muhaysini, a Saudi cleric, is Nusra's chief ideologue in Syria. Some considered him the new Osama Bin-Laden. Here he is, on the left, arm in arm with chief al-Qaeda in Syria propagandist and "journalist" Hadi Abdullah.


bigger

Hadi Abdullah, friend of the designated al-Qaeda terrorist Muhaysini, just received the 2016 Press Freedom Price from the CIA/Soros financed "regime change" influence operation Reporters Without Borders. Might this mean that Hadi Abdullah is himself a CIA assets? He would not be the first such "journalist" in Syria.

Obama, obviously as a direct consequence of the Trump election, now ordered the Pentagon to wage war on al-Qaeda in Syria just as the Russians do. This after five years of nearly unlimited U.S. support for al-Qaeda and its "moderate" Syrian affiliates. It is not yet know what new orders, if any, Obama gave to the CIA. Will the CIA follow these policies or will it (again) try to counter the Pentagon policies in Syria? It is unusual that the WaPo report above about this new direction includes no commenting voice from the CIA. Why is such missing?

Russia and Syria will welcome the new Obama policies should they come to fruit on the ground. Hillary Clinton had planned and announced to widen the conflict in Syria and with Russia and Iran. Obama would surely not have acted against such policies if she had been elected. But with Trump winning and thereby a new policy on the horizon he now changed course to a direction that will provide "continuity" when Trump takes over.

Not only is Trump kicking a black family out of its longtime limewashed home, he also ends U.S. government support for the disenfranchised Jihadis in Syria and elsewhere. This even months before taking office. He really is the menace we have all been warned about.


bigger

UPDATE:

This interview in today's WSJ confirms that Trump is still in the pro-Syrian/anti-Jihadist camp that is opposed to Obama's original policy:

Donald Trump, in Exclusive Interview, Tells WSJ He Is Willing to Keep Parts of Obama Health Law

He said he got a “beautiful” letter from Russian President Vladimir Putin, adding that a phone call between them is scheduled shortly.

Although he wasn’t specific, Mr. Trump suggested a shift away from what he said was the current Obama administration policy of attempting to find moderate Syrian opposition groups to support in the civil war there. “I’ve had an opposite view of many people regarding Syria,” he said.

He suggested a sharper focus on fighting Islamic State, or ISIS, in Syria, rather than on ousting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. “My attitude was you’re fighting Syria, Syria is fighting ISIS, and you have to get rid of ISIS. Russia is now totally aligned with Syria, and now you have Iran, which is becoming powerful, because of us, is aligned with Syria. … Now we’re backing rebels against Syria, and we have no idea who these people are.”

If the U.S. attacks Mr. Assad, Mr. Trump said, “we end up fighting Russia, fighting Syria.”

Comments

Excerpt from a post-election interview with the WSJ:

Although he wasn’t specific, Mr. Trump suggested a shift away from what he said was the current Obama administration policy of attempting to find moderate Syrian opposition groups to support in the civil war there. “I’ve had an opposite view of many people regarding Syria,” he said.
He suggested a sharper focus on fighting Islamic State, or ISIS, in Syria, rather than on ousting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. “My attitude was you’re fighting Syria, Syria is fighting ISIS, and you have to get rid of ISIS. Russia is now totally aligned with Syria, and now you have Iran, which is becoming powerful, because of us, is aligned with Syria. … Now we’re backing rebels against Syria, and we have no idea who these people are.”
If the U.S. attacks Mr. Assad, Mr. Trump said, “we end up fighting Russia, fighting Syria.”

It remains to be seen whether Trump will fare any better than Obama in terms of a new foreign policy direction (I believe his “choice” of VP is a trojan horse and that he’ll eventually surround himself with enough members of the old guard not to).

Posted by: never mind | Nov 12 2016 7:40 utc | 101

Paveway
Thanks for your reply. You have filled in a few gaps for me as I have watched videos of Nusra preparations for attacks on Aleppo showing the suicide shock troops that go in behind the VBIEDs. Wearing balaclava’s, uniforms, all similar build, athletic, fit, well trained looking. I have wondered who they where since seeing the videos.
I check on Magnier, Leith Fadel, and several other twitter accounts as part of my daily reading, yet have never seen a hint as to who these fighters were.
The Saudi/GCC Special forces I was unaware of as I have not seen them mentioned in any of my reading. Though if they are in Yemen, they would seem to be outclassed?
Regarding US sorties into Russian controlled airspace. I believe how it works is the US works out a plan that it knows is acceptable to Russia, then simply announces the planned strikes to Russia. This allows the US to save face.
Overall your reply is one of the better analysis of the situation in Syria that I have seen.

Posted by: Peter AU | Nov 12 2016 8:02 utc | 102

Donald Trump, in Exclusive Interview, Tells WSJ He Is Willing to Keep Parts of Obama Health Law

Although he wasn’t specific, Mr. Trump suggested a shift away from what he said was the current Obama administration policy of attempting to find moderate Syrian opposition groups to support in the civil war there. “I’ve had an opposite view of many people regarding Syria,” he said.
He suggested a sharper focus on fighting Islamic State, or ISIS, in Syria, rather than on ousting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. “My attitude was you’re fighting Syria, Syria is fighting ISIS, and you have to get rid of ISIS. Russia is now totally aligned with Syria, and now you have Iran, which is becoming powerful, because of us, is aligned with Syria. … Now we’re backing rebels against Syria, and we have no idea who these people are.”
If the U.S. attacks Mr. Assad, Mr. Trump said, “we end up fighting Russia, fighting Syria.”

Posted by: b | Nov 12 2016 8:52 utc | 103

“The U.S. declared that from now on it will fight against al-Qaeda in Syria:”
Guess the U.S. will now begin targeting the al-Nusra contingent in the Golan and its Israeli enablers.
Uncovering the Tacit Cooperation between Israel and Jabhat al-Nusra
http://www.globalresearch.ca/uncovering-the-tacit-cooperation-between-israel-and-jabhat-al-nusra/5529257

Posted by: pantaraxia | Nov 12 2016 9:17 utc | 104

Isn’t ksa part of the gcc? Why not calling them gcc mercenaries then?
Very likely uk/us trained moroccans plus others largely binationals
Lots of palestinians, egyptians,lebanese are born in the gcc countries from migrant parents

Posted by: mina | Nov 12 2016 9:28 utc | 105

b | Nov 12, 2016 3:52:55 AM | 103
Holy shit; maybe, just maybe, there’s an operational intelligence coming to the WH…

Posted by: V. Arnold | Nov 12 2016 9:30 utc | 106

In perhaps the most delicious irony of this election any questions as to the Obama legacy have been laid to rest. The repudiation of Obama/Clinton policies have left this legacy in tatters. By selling out to Wall Street and the 1%, Obama betrayed the very basis of his “hope and change” platform and thereby created the conditions for the emergence of a Donald Trump (or Bernie Sanders). This is his legacy. He will go down in history as a footnote: another American President beholden to the interests of Wall Street (a la Bill Clinton) who just happened to be black.

Posted by: pantaraxia | Nov 12 2016 9:53 utc | 107

The meme in CNN is that when Trump met Obama he was humbled…..wtf……

Posted by: notlurking | Nov 12 2016 12:00 utc | 109

Trump also wins on TPP! Obama won’t pursue passage during Congress’s lameduck session.

Posted by: fairleft | Nov 12 2016 13:00 utc | 110

Does anyone know if the mosuleye blog is genuinely by someone in Mosul?
I really want to think it is real but something makes me doubt.
https://mosuleye.wordpress.com/

Posted by: Mina | Nov 12 2016 13:15 utc | 111

@111 Who can be sure? There are enough spelling mistakes to make it look genuine and you can’t blame him/her for wanting to be anonymous.
Re Trump and Syria. Trump will be accused of weakness if he negotiates with Putin and Assad. Perhaps even of the ultimate humiliation….’kissing their asses’. He will need support from people like Dunsford to get anything achieved in Syria.

Posted by: dh | Nov 12 2016 15:14 utc | 112

To all you purists ;You are gonna love Trump.Heehee.
He singlehandedly defeated the zionmonsters in America.
Now the world!
America uber alles?Nah.Who cares.Just bring US some sovereignty,and voila!
Talk about a sea change.
And if he had been beaten,by the fix they tried to perform,I might be out rioting,so I’ll give the brainwashed morons a little slack.
Wake up fools.

Posted by: dahoit | Nov 12 2016 15:16 utc | 113

If – and that’s a big if – Tronald stands to his relatively Russia-friendly foreign policy, this will be the only positive aspect of his otherwise utterly reactionary presidency. So no reason to rejoice B.
By the way; Tronald lost the popular vote by over 1 Million votes. The vote count is not finished yet. He will have a huge legitimacy problem.

Posted by: Pnyx | Nov 12 2016 15:47 utc | 114

Given the degree of GCC money in UK universities, or that of Qatari influence in other European universities, I wonder what will happen to the “big professors” who have taken the habit to go to Qatar give a lecture per year, under the pressure of their broken administrations…. Same as the EU politicians, they are left on their own now.

Posted by: Mina | Nov 12 2016 15:47 utc | 115

12 November 2016 16:02
Donald Trump Says He Would Consider Seeking Advice from Bill Clinton
http://en.alalam.ir/news/1884385
nice of the writer to include the very pic I was going to dig up & post with the article.
Anyone know how Drompf will “divest at arms length” his eponymous hotel chain, which I note in news claims he is going into the M.E./SW Asia area U.A.E. Dubai, etc?
Something about a conflict of interest.

Posted by: schlub | Nov 12 2016 16:17 utc | 116

I have yet another extremely long comment in the making that i don’t expect anybody to read but to my fans here, please let me know if you prefer it shorter.

Posted by: PavewayIV | Nov 12 2016 16:37 utc | 117

It’s as childish to call Trump “Drumpf” or the like as it is for Republicans to insist on calling the Democratic Party the “Democrat Party.”

Posted by: lysias | Nov 12 2016 16:40 utc | 118

@117:
I´m certainly not your fan so please shove it up your ass.

Posted by: Susan Sunflower | Nov 12 2016 16:45 utc | 119

re: Perimetr | Nov 11, 2016 4:59:19 PM | 65
RED ALERT!!! I think it desperately needs to be expanded upon!
{quote} Defeated Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton is not about to «go quietly into that good night». On the morning after her surprising and unanticipated defeat at the hands of Republican Party upstart Donald Trump, Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, entered the ball room of the art-deco New Yorker hotel in midtown Manhattan and were both adorned in purple attire. The press immediately noticed the color and asked what it represented. Clinton spokespeople claimed it was to represent the coming together of Democratic «Blue America» and Republican «Red America» into a united purple blend. This statement was a complete ruse as is known by citizens of countries targeted in the past by the vile political operations of international hedge fund tycoon George Soros.
The Clintons, who both have received millions of dollars in campaign contributions and Clinton Foundation donations from Soros, were, in fact, helping to launch Soros’s «Purple Revolution» in America. The Purple Revolution will resist all efforts by the Trump administration to push back against the globalist policies of the Clintons and soon-to-be ex-President Barack Obama. The Purple Revolution will also seek to make the Trump administration a short one through Soros-style street protests and political disruption. {end quote} — by Wayne Madsen, 11/11/16:
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/11/11/clintons-and-soros-launch-america-purple-revolution.html
“Mirror”:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-11/clintons-and-soros-launch-americas-purple-revolution
Paul Craig Roberts has more on this:
{quote} The Anti-Trump Protesters Are Tools of the Oligarchy — Paul Craig Roberts
= = = In Article = = =
Who are the anti-Trump protesters besmirching the name of progressives by pretending to be progressives and by refusing to accept the outcome of the presidential election? They look like, and are acting worse than, the “white trash” that they are denouncing.
I think I know who they are. They are thugs for hire and are paid by the Oligarchy to delegitimize Trump’s presidency in the way that Washington and the German Marshall Fund paid students in Kiev to protest the democratically elected Ukrainian government in order to prepare the way for a coup.
The organization, change.org, which claims to be a progressive group, but might be a front, along with other progressive groups, for the Oligarchy, is destroying the reputation of all progressives by circulating a petition that directs the electors of the Electoral Collage to annul the election by casting their votes for Hillary. Remember how upset progressives were when Trump said he might not accept the election result if there was evidence that the vote was rigged? Now progressives are doing what they damned Trump for saying he might do under certain conditions.
The Western presstitutes used the protests in Kiev to delegitimize a democratically elected government and to set it up for a coup. The protest pay was good enough that non-Ukrainians came from nearby countries to participate in the protest in order to collect the money. At the time I posted the amounts paid daily to protesters. Reports came in to me from Eastern and Western Europe from people who were not Ukrainian but were paid to protest as if they were Ukrainians.
The same thing is going on with the Trump protests. CNN reports that “for many Americans across the country, Donald Trump’s victory is an outcome they simply refuse to accept. Tens of thousands filled the streets in at least 25 US cities overnight.” This is the exact reporting that the Oligarchy desired from its presstitutes and got. {end quote} — by Paul Craig Roberts — 11/11/16:
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/11/11/the-anti-trump-protesters-are-tools-of-the-oligarchy-paul-craig-roberts/
Now, who is “change.org”? From their website:
{quote} Investment
To date, Change.org has raised $50 million dollars to fuel its growth from mission-aligned investors in business, technology and the media including Richard Branson, Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman, Arianna Huffington, Ashton Kutcher & Guy Oseary, Jeff Weiner, Evan Williams, and the Omidyar Network. {end quote}:
https://www.change.org/about/business-model
So it looks like these “neo-Libyans” will attempt some sort of a coup d’etat, with the aid of a series of wussy riots. So now we have mercenary (low rent) agent provocateurs, plus certain people who have been convinced they are on the side of the angels, overthrowing that Evil Mastermind, “Chancellor” Donald Trump.
Was it Sun Tzu who said “People who willingly fight on behalf of their enemies (???)…” (I forgot the rest of it.)

Posted by: blues | Nov 12 2016 16:50 utc | 120

@117 paveway iV , please show it . I am big fan of moon of Alabama.

Posted by: jack | Nov 12 2016 16:56 utc | 121

I´m in a “link dumping”/copy & paste mode today since i have nothing to contribute myself so please have patience

Posted by: blues | Nov 12 2016 16:57 utc | 122

That just previous comment was NOT posted by me. Weird!

Posted by: blues | Nov 12 2016 16:59 utc | 123

@119 — not my post — the real SusanSunflower — please delete

Posted by: Susan Sunflower | Nov 12 2016 17:00 utc | 124

On October 2016, Newt Gringrich’s view on Assad and rebels is exactly the opposite of Trump’s. Can he change so quickly?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyyCgzdPxtY

Posted by: virgile | Nov 12 2016 17:10 utc | 125

pnyx @ 114 “Tronald lost the popular vote by over 1 Million votes”
Source please. Pew Research gives Hillary barely 200,000 more. Both JFK and W lost the popular vote but had no problems with legitimacy. Not that unusual. It’s happened 5 times.
PavewayIV @ 117 — Short or long? I want to read it either way.

Posted by: Ken Nari | Nov 12 2016 17:15 utc | 126

PavewayIV@117 – Wow, a Paveway imposter that somehow knows I’m writing a post. I haven’t been so honored since I was mentioned in Wikileaks! This is for you, Paveway:
Peter AU@102 – I assume your Aussie, so I’m kind of surprised you haven’t heard anything about the UAE SF. I had mistakenly said Blackwater was hired to build the UAE’s SF, but it was a shadowy Blackwater-like outfit called R2 if I’m not mistaken. Same nebulous five-eyes intelligence community ties; not sure if R2 itself was Aussie.
The build team they sent over in 2011 was mostly Aussie, including some colonel that was allowed to retired directly out of the Aussie Army to head the UAE SF. A lot of other Aussie (and western) SF types followed him over for lucrative positions as well. The UAE is tiny, so while the SF is officially under the Emirates’ military command, it’s mostly non-UAE mercs. The more conspiratorial among us would say it was a private western/Israeli/GCC merc army created and intended to be used initially in Libya and then in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. Other skeptics might just observe that the UAE with its tiny army hardly needs dedicated SF forces numbering in the thousands.
The UAE uses and treats their SF exactly like it’s their own private merc army, spreading the weaponized Muslim Brotherhood love across the Middle East and putting the screws to Iran. Other SF-types apparently don’t care much for them – they’re mostly butchers (and quite intentionally so).
I quite often use the terms fake-al Nusra and fake-ISIS. The UAE SF would be perfect in that role, including the head-chopping part. They are still experienced, well-trained pros and good at their jobs, they’re just homicidal psychopaths as well. Israel used them as part of the fake al-Nusra to take out Syrian air defenses and listening posts in the hills bordering the Golan. The GCC and western powers seem to frequently employ them in other operations that it can’t trust to the everyday head-choppers.
It was suggested – internet rumors of course – that they had some part (rather than the Saudis) in killing and staging the victims for the (fake) East Gouta chemical weapons attack. The few accounts of direct Saudi involvement were just a red herring, although I’m sure their intelligence guys were part of the scheme. That makes sense, and these psychos are certainly capable of such inhumanity.
I certainly can’t substantiate any of this with MSM citations, of course. You’re not going to read about this in the NYT or hear it on ABC down under. This is SF-types gossip and the occasional observations (like yours) of, “Hey – those guys don’t really look like your run-of-the-mill, Captagon-fueled jihadis.” Then there’s the occasional mil-types that report suspicious-looking head-choppers sporting titanium-barreled rifles (costs about as much as a truck there) running around Syria and Yemen. Add tin-foil had and you have the perfect cover for GCC/Israeli/western intelligence wet-work with plenty of plausible deniability.

Posted by: PavewayIV | Nov 12 2016 17:18 utc | 127

@127 paveway.. funny, i thought the same way when i just read the post @117… someone was doing this with rufus on the last thread as well.. it is fairly easy to spot, but then people are duped easily too..
i 2nd paulAU’s comments to you.. thanks for your post @97 and your latest…
mina – thanks for your posts..
b – thanks for that additional comment above..

Posted by: james | Nov 12 2016 17:38 utc | 128

i see they are mimicking susan @119 as well..

Posted by: james | Nov 12 2016 17:42 utc | 129

It appears the thrust west from Aleppo into Idlib aims to cut the province in two on the Hama-Aleppo line, and from there to roll the terrorists back to the Turkish border. The siege of East Aleppo will continue until the terrorists all die or surrender as the noose is slowly drawn tighter but without much urgency. The Damascus region will soon be rat free which will allow the big push to free Eastern Syria to begin. Not to be forgotten, the Southern front is slowly being purged of terrorists too. Further details can be had at Southfront and Syrpers. From my POV, the “policy change” is being driven by the altering of the battlefield.

Posted by: karlof1 | Nov 12 2016 17:43 utc | 130

The impersonations are hilarious. My hat’s off to the imposter.

Posted by: Jackrabbit | Nov 12 2016 17:52 utc | 131

84
The ‘tailpipe’ tax here was resoundingly defeated, once voters found out the ‘Global Warming Fee’ would be rolled into the General Fund for government salaries and pensions for life, the same way that Americans’ Social Security Trust Fund was rolled into the General Fund as the Fed’s junk bond ‘buyer of last resort’. If you believe linear projections, never mind hyperbolic, America’s national debt (sic) by Trump 2 will be $30,000,000,000,000, and the ‘funds lost track of’ audit at the Pentagon will have reached a staggering $10,000,000,000,000 gone MIA.
It’s not that Trump’s against ‘Global Warming’, it’s that they don’t *need* a Fossil Fuel tax now. They *own* USA.
Obama 1 and 2 was just the Hope and Chains smiley-face Fed bailout, to let the Exceptionals get to the lifeboats.

Posted by: chipnik | Nov 12 2016 17:56 utc | 132

Good afternoon barflies….help my lying eyes as I ROTFLMAO.
Guess the Grey Lady rag is feeling some heat from ALT MEDIA warriors.
Kudos b.
Ya think Sulzberger Jr., may have been lurking here?
New York Times publisher vows to ‘rededicate’ paper to reporting honestly
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/12/new-york-times-publisher-vows-to-rededicate-itself-to-reporting-honestly.html
“The publisher of The New York Times penned a letter to readers Friday promising that the paper would “reflect” on its coverage of this year’s election while rededicating itself to reporting on “America and the world” honestly.
Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., the paper’s embattled publisher, appealed to Times readers for their continued support.
“We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers,” the letter states.”
[.]
Never mind the header. Guy doesn’t get it. Go read the letter.
Maybe Sulzberger Jr., will start with the ME. He should invite WAPO to join his about face.
A tad late as you lost the news share to the real journalists.

Posted by: likklemore | Nov 12 2016 18:08 utc | 133

B @103
Trump was clear about his views on Syria and ISIS during the election. They haven’t changed.
The question is: will the Assad must go! crowd relent after many years and hundreds of billions of dollars? They have both the resources and the bile to try to manipulate Trump by forcing his hand due to ‘facts on the ground’ developed in the lead-up to inauguration.
For example: A big wild card is Turkey. Would the new President Trump back NATO-member Turkey in a (false-flag?) showdown? He would come under enormous pressure to back Turkey from those who were critical of his stance toward allies during the campaign.

Posted by: Jackrabbit | Nov 12 2016 18:10 utc | 134

@125 Sure, Newt will do a complete U turn if it’s what Trump wants. Still no clear signal though what he wants to do in Syria. No doubt Netanyahu wants to continue the chaos and the Saudis have money and arms to send. Erdogan is waiting for a signal too.
Trump did echo Dunsford in saying that DIRECT involvement means war with Russia.

Posted by: dh | Nov 12 2016 18:11 utc | 135

The Hill:
Historian who predicted Trump’s win says he’ll be impeached

“I’m going to make another prediction,” Allan Lichtman told The Washington Post Friday. “This one is not based on a system; it’s just my gut. They don’t want Trump as president, because they can’t control him. He’s unpredictable. They’d love to have Pence — an absolutely down-the-line, conservative, controllable Republican. And I’m quite certain Trump will give someone grounds for impeachment, either by doing something that endangers national security or because it helps his pocketbook.”

Posted by: Laura Roslin | Nov 12 2016 18:49 utc | 136

We must all hope that the US government’s new found effort to find and kill Muhaysini will not be successful. Muhaysini has been very successful in sending rats to their pre-arranged 72 virgins, thus significantly lowering the numbers and morale of the jihadis. He is a real (though unintended) asset to the Syrian government.

Posted by: William Rood | Nov 12 2016 19:05 utc | 137

More on Trump! Bet you haven´t seen this rather compromising info about him before, check it out:
http://www.dagay.com/gayhard

Posted by: james | Nov 12 2016 19:12 utc | 138

Sorry, wrong link, here it is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

Posted by: james | Nov 12 2016 19:13 utc | 139

RE. White House.
Read (no idea if true) that Trump + family have no intention of living in the decrepit, moldy, unfashionable, White House. Several precedents exist. (see wiki.)
Plus, that Bill Clinton never wanted to live there again – he has his own life, imagine the security, etc. – and being the primo First Husband was not exactly his cup of tea, surprise.
Naturally, the First Lady role would have been taken on by Chelsea, who actually held it before, when HRC was ‘sick’, as a ‘stand-in’ though wiki+ don’t list her — to cover up that HRC couldn’t even perform the F. L. position at the time.
A telling symbol – the physical seat of ‘world’ power, where the *very* top dogs live, the supposedly majestic – historical building is considered trashy, passé, and too rigorously policed.
Inhabited recently by ‘black’ Dem operatives who dug up the garden to send the message that kiddos can grow veggies! and need! to eat such. Beyond pathetic.
Ppl all over the world react to these hints, symbols, codes. They may not know what is going on in Yemen, as the MSM does not report, so they fall back on interpreting these signs.
The supreme irony is that the MSM tried to spin so high, sent out ‘memes’ and lies on trivia, they forced the public to turn to the same register!

Posted by: Noirette | Nov 12 2016 19:22 utc | 140

@120 Good job blues.. A topic B maybe should cover, lets see how things evolve over the nexr few days..
Purple, color or the Roman emperors..

Posted by: Lozion | Nov 12 2016 19:31 utc | 141

@138 james.. a different james.. the name stealing continues..

Posted by: james | Nov 12 2016 20:02 utc | 142

@142 Source? Link?

Posted by: lysias | Nov 12 2016 20:42 utc | 143

Daily Mail interviews middle-aged white man who was beaten up by a black mob in Chicago for having voted for Trump.
‘Next thing I knew they were beating the s**t out of me’: Man beaten as onlookers shouted anti-Trump taunts said attack unfolded after a crash
.

Posted by: lysias | Nov 12 2016 20:45 utc | 144

I wonder in view of the ongoing riots in the US if the President would have declared martial law were he not a partisan of HRC?
The Defense acts give him all powers to do so and the FEMA camps are ready to accept inmates. Lo and behold, he is seemingly part of the Soros/neocons conspiration.

Posted by: CarlD | Nov 12 2016 21:10 utc | 145

likklemore @ 133
Re: Sulzberger family that run the NewYorkTimes:
George Seldes, famous journalist/foreign correspondent who dies at 104 in 1995, recounted his meeting with NYT publisher A H Sulzberger during the Spanish Civil War.
Seldes was on the scene in Spain and witnessed events that were reported as pure fantasy in the NYT. When he returned to USA in 1936[?] , he explained to AHS that the NYT stories were fairly accurate as taken from war correspondents reports on the Republican side, but the reports of events on the falangist Francisco Franco side included utter fantasy.
In fact, a small clique within the NYT editorial staff were just making-up propaganda to satisfy their personal bias.
AHS explained that he, himself, was not a journalist, but only insisted only that the NYT “present accounts from both sides”; that the 3 writers in New York [not on the scene in Spain]that favored the Franco side were responsible for presenting ” the other side”, thus NYT printed whatever they wrote; and that was that!
IIRC, the source here is from Seldes’ book , Tell The Truth And Run!

Posted by: chu teh | Nov 12 2016 21:28 utc | 146

Very interesting to watch Obama. Your news on him
do fit seamlessly into his weakness and strength,
as is displayed by his birthchart. ASC Aquarius = strange genius
and Leo-Sun but in the 6th house = adaption. Like Carl Jung
said of Mercury: not straight bad, but bad with the bad
and good with the good
Here my take on the Donald now President elect.
http://astromundanediary.blogspot.de/2016/03/the-donald-in-front-of-triumph.html

Posted by: mundanomaniac | Nov 12 2016 21:33 utc | 147

Can Trump be removed from office?
I guess that he accumulated enough dirty deals (think Whitewater, but real) and peccadilloes that it could be done if someone unloaded some barrels of stink. But the word was that FBI likes Trump, so it would have to be CIA and possibly NSA, where some Cold War Warriors may still exist in “hibernation” (I mean, they remain Cold). They could even organize a tame version of Wikileaks. But this is a hard sell to Congress that just got GOP president and has GOP majority in both houses.
I see a larger problem in enforcing the freeze on weapon supplies to rebels. The Gulfies have stashed a lot of TOWs etc. USA could forbid to “transfer” them, but that requires cooperative CIA to enforce. And I suspect that Erdogan is still thinking about jihad, unless Trump delivers a nicely wrapped package with Fetullah Gulen inside (there is some hierarchy in Erdogan’s obsessions). However, a swift victory over ISIS that can result from degradation of fighting capabilities of the rebels would be a useful boon for Trump who may experience some wreckage elsewhere (a marvelous replacement of Obamacare. restoration of American jobs by imposing high import duties etc.)

Posted by: Piotr Berman | Nov 12 2016 21:36 utc | 148

Paveway 127
I was aware of Australians in UAE but had taken it for granted they were private operaters/mercs. I believe one or two in the UAE forces in Yemen where killed some months back.
Possibly two separate branches of the Saudi/GCC SF mercs here? The western ex SF types – perhaps a mixture of ex special forces and quasi “ex” special forces, and then the Islamist SF’s drawn from international jihadsts that will go on suicide missions?

Posted by: Peter AU | Nov 12 2016 21:40 utc | 149

Alexander Mercouris: First effect of Trump win: Al-Qaeda morale in Aleppo collapses, Western campaign against Russian bombing ends

Reports from the area of the battlefield speak of a total collapse of morale amongst the Al-Qaeda led Jihadi forces which have been attacking the city from the south west, as whatever lingering hopes there were of a Western military intervention following a victory by Hillary Clinton in the US Presidential election have turned to dust.
The result is that the Jihadi forces have been rapidly losing ground in the south western suburbs of Aleppo over the last three days, a fact which has apparently obliged Al-Qaeda to draw on its last reserves in order to rush reinforcements to the front to prevent a total collapse there.
As always the situation is confused, but it seems the Syrian army has now entirely liberated the strategically located 1070 housing complex and the Minyan and Al-Assad districts, and that it is starting to develop an offensive towards the strategically important town of Khan Tuman, which is the base from which the Al-Qaeda led Jihadis launch their attacks on south west Aleppo.
Importantly these Syrian army advances are taking place despite the continued absence of Russian bombing in the area of Aleppo.

Posted by: Demian | Nov 12 2016 22:42 utc | 150

@ chu the 147
”thus NYT printed whatever they wrote; and that was that!”
Thank you for expanding on their history.
In Jr,.’s letter I noticed he did not relinquish being a division of that certain 3-letter agency. NYT is reputed to print the regular hand-outs.

Posted by: likklemore | Nov 12 2016 22:59 utc | 151

Tuesday 15th should clear the fog. It appears Paul Ryan for re-election of Speaker of the House is in trouble.
Does not have the necessary 218 votes.
Not trusted as he flip-flops
[.]While Massie noted that his own opposition to Ryan’s Speakership stems largely from procedural issues rather than specific policies, other conservative lawmakers have expressed concern that Ryan’s policy agenda, as well as his demonstrations of poor leadership throughout the election season, have made him unfit to run the Republican party in Congress.
In particular, some lawmakers have pointed to Ryan’s efforts to seemingly undermine Trump’s campaign. Last month, Congressman Mark Meadows said that a lot of conservatives “question the loyalty of the Speaker” in light of Ryan’s treatment of Trump and said that the push to remove Ryan as Speaker was “picking up some steam.”[.]
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/11/paul-ryan-gave-congress-constitutional-crisis/
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/11/exclusive-rep-huelskamp-speaker-ryan-does-not-have-218-votes/

Posted by: likklemore | Nov 12 2016 23:02 utc | 152

@151 Demian. Excellent news. Hmeimim airbase, augmented by the Carrier group can now focus on Idlib province with the SAA & allies pushing westwards in a classic pincer move. The rats will have no choice but retreat to Hatay or get vaporised. Lets watch Erdo’s next move..

Posted by: Lozion | Nov 12 2016 23:09 utc | 153

http://avauncer.com/2016/11/12/us-obama-administration-gives-up-on-enacting-tpp-trade-deal.html
US President Barack Obama’s administration has suspended efforts to win congressional approval for the Trans-Pacific Partnership before president-elect Donald Trump takes office, saying the TPP’s fate is up to Trump and Republicans. Trump calls the TPP a “disaster”, and even Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton denounced the deal, despite fully backing it while she was secretary of state. However, Trump’s election victory, which sends him to the White House in January and retains Republican majorities in congress, has stymied those plans.

Posted by: okie farmer | Nov 12 2016 23:37 utc | 154

b: PLEASE delete #138.
Not only hard-core porn, but appears to include child porn as well, and could get this site shut down for good.

Posted by: AntiSpin | Nov 12 2016 23:38 utc | 155

@AntiSpin #156:
I wish you’d warned me that it is gay porn. If I’d known that, I- wouldn’t have clicked on the link.
It’s all right now. We’re in the age of Trump. One doesn’t have to be politically correct anymore. (I guess that you thought that to point out that the porn is gay might be politically incorrect. And indeed, PC had gotten so crazy that it is very hard to tell what might offend somebody.)

Posted by: Demian | Nov 13 2016 0:08 utc | 156

re: AntiSpin | Nov 12, 2016 6:38:54 PM | 156
YES B — PLEASE DELETE:
james | Nov 12, 2016 2:12:40 PM | 138
THIS INCREDIBLE PORN SITE VERY LIKELY CONTAINS KIDDIE PORN.
OBVIOUSLY IT’S A FAKE “JAMES”.
THIS FAKE NAMES THING COULD TURN INTO A DISASTER!

Posted by: blues | Nov 13 2016 0:50 utc | 157

This fake-name stuff is odd. Has it happened before?
Be careful. And maybe consider changing the settings for moderation of comments.
Apart from that:
Thanks Paveway 127, very interesting as always. Impossible for me to tell how realistic, but definitely possible.

Posted by: grandson | Nov 13 2016 1:19 utc | 158

On b’s update … I wonder if Trump is looking at his line of existing and prospective products and doing a sort of market survey? The bread and butter in his product line is making the rich (himself) richer in the US, and he seems to regard the neo-cons ‘overseas adventures’ as inessential to his paramount aim, so he can just drop them, especially if that will buy him public acceptance for his paleo-con plans for the US itself. The military can be brought on board easily. They were perfectly happy with the way things were prior to the GWOT : spend grillions on ‘defense’ … and never use it. Scare your opponents to death. That was undoubtedly their MO then. Spending money and skimming the top afterwork was just fine with them, and surely remains just fine. And, frankly, going up against the Russians/Chinese is probably not too appealing to them … they have real reasons to fight, to defend themselves. And their fighting gear actually works.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 13 2016 1:26 utc | 159

@127 PW
What you’re saying accounts for a lot. I always appreciate your informed comment, even if some of the information itself is questionable. It’s always plainly marked so. Truth in advertising. And everything is questionable until information becomes available to verify it or falsify it … many things are never resolved to everyone’s satisfaction. Especially stuff fished out of the waters you swim in. Glad you were a dry suit … I guess it is, right? And the tinfoil hat on top to enhance reception 🙂 Most importantly, of course: I share your bias.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 13 2016 1:36 utc | 160

@160 The people employed making weapons like it too. Trouble is periodically you have to fire off a few cruise missiles so the stockpile can be replaced. Iraq was perfect for that. But the Russians/Chinese will certainly fire back. That may be a step too far for the military.

Posted by: dh | Nov 13 2016 1:37 utc | 161

grandson @159
Yes it has happened before. b deletes the nonsense (eventually0.
The trickster has a wicked and non-PC sense of humor. One must follow the blog closely to understand the humor.

Posted by: Jackrabbit | Nov 13 2016 1:59 utc | 162

Should have seen this coming. NY Times reports this as if it’s a straight news story:
Donald Trump’s Election Leaves Angela Merkel as the Liberal West’s Last Defender
The Guardian suggested the same thing in an opinion piece:
Populists are out to divide us. They must be stopped
It turns out that the American people don’t get to choose the leader of the free world anymore.

Posted by: Demian | Nov 13 2016 2:42 utc | 163

@162 dh, ‘you have to fire off a few cruise missiles so the stockpile can be replaced’
Not in the ‘good ole days’. They just put ‘fins’ on the ‘new’ ones and declared the old ones obsolete. Detroit … they used to make cars in Detroit … ‘privatized’ the idea as well, and literally put fins on cars and made the old ones obsolete. DARPA was in charge of ‘new’. They invented the internet, among other things, and designed in its zero-day defects for the NSA.
They can do it again. Looks like Donald might follow that road to Make America Great Again. It’s an illusion. All you need is a ‘majority’ of believers … or people who’ll vote for it, anyway. This last election was true to form. The ‘surprise’ lay only in the one judged to be the most evil of the two flavors available for selection.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 13 2016 2:55 utc | 164

To claim the trump is more powerful and has more influence over the US deep state on day one is just ludicrous.
Posted by: tom | Nov 11, 2016 1:25:03 PM | 37
Yeah, people believe what they want to believe. Here’s the most cynical view.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60nOmmLtJSY And he may be right. I don’t think I have enough data right now to
account for the newest happenings.

Posted by: Penelope | Nov 13 2016 4:21 utc | 165

@Penelope #166:
Yeah, people believe what they want to believe.
If Trump’s victory means nothing, why is this happening:
Fomenting a national crisis and color revolution: Soros-funded anti-Trump protesters riot in cities across United States

USA Today counted over 50 protests since Tuesday night and over a dozen more known already planned. The MoveOn.org supplying the centralized organizers of these nationwide protests in reaction to a Trump presidency is intended to spread and grow over time into a political movement throughout the country. Soros is prepared to fuel the protests with deep pockets and paid professional anarchistsdesigned to incite widespread violence, vandalism and civil unrest throughout the US. The treasonous aging billionaire is seeking regime change right here in America in plain sight, clearly a direct assault on our nation’s democratic principles, against both the democratically elected leader as well as against the will of the American people who specifically voted for the outsider as a rejection of the very corrupt dirty power politics game represented by Soros, Hillary and her Democratic Party.

Here’s a video of Chris Matthews giving a talk to what he calls “a lot of rich people”. He explains why Trump has a good chance to win the election, and there is absolutely no talk about Trump being a racist, misogynist, etc. All of that – which is supposedly what these demonstrators are protesting against – is just Clintonite propaganda directed at the masses by the Establishment.

Posted by: Demian | Nov 13 2016 4:38 utc | 166

Peter AU@150 – I guess there’s at least three different ‘SF-type’ organizations operating in/from the UAE.
UAE Presidential Guard
It looks like the guy I was referring to in the previous post was a former Aussie SAS/SF guy: Major General Mike Hindmarsh. He is now (by his own admission) “a serving officer in the UAE Armed Forces” and is listed as Commander of the Presidential Guard.
From the U.S. State Department’s Background Notes page:

“… In early 2010, the Presidential Guard (PG) was formed. The PG is comprised of Marines, Reconnaissance, Aviation, Special Forces/Amiri Guard and Mechanized Brigades. PG personnel are conducting operations in Afghanistan (the only Arab personnel undertaking full-scale operations in the country)…”

He was involved in relocating Aussie troops and the AU regional military headquarters from Iraq to the UAE in 2009-2010. There were and are regular AU troops in the UAE now unrelated to Hindmarsh’s current position/activities in the Presidential Guard. From the Middle East Eye last December:
Revealed: The mercenaries commanding UAE forces in Yemen
So there are apparently around 5000 UAE personnel just in the Presidential Guard. Considering that the entirety of the UAE military is just over 20,000 personnel, the so-called Presidential Guard seems pretty beefy. The U.S. Marines have some kind of long-term contract to train the Presidential Guard like Marines. The UAE constitution supposedly forbids UAE military from anything but defensive operations, so I doubt this outfit is involved in any Syrian or Yemeni intrigue. However, the Crown Prince decided to work around the UAE constitution by forming a kind of foreign legion of mercs he could send wherever he saw fit. To build that foreign legion, he hired these guys:
Reflex Response (R2)
This was basically Erik Prince’s (Blackwater/Academi/XE) non-US spin-off – which he swears he has no involvement in [cough!] – based in Abu Dhabi. It seems Mr. Prince’s companies had attracted the attention of U.S. federal law enforcement for their questionable activities around the world. Prince and not-really-his spin-off scurried to the UAE to avoid the prying eyes and legal wrath of the U.S. (but still offer services to them). The fact that he was a trusted merc supplier to the U.S. but was no longer bound by U.S. law made his ‘services’ even more attractive to the CIA and DoD and also gave them an out in case their ‘foreign’ contractor ran afoul of U.S. or international law. His first ‘big’ customer was the Crown Prince of the UAE, but he as since expanded his now non-U.S. business there across the globe. Last I heard, he was building his own ‘special’ kind of air force at the UAE R2 base. And he apparently has a LOT of U.S./NATO, Middle Eastern and Israeli business. R2 was/is supposedly recruiting U.S. JTACs and the pay is phenomenal. Why, if I were younger and a homicidal psychopath… oh, never mind. Hard to say how big of a force he has, but it has to be at least a couple thousand contractors (not all head-choppers). He had to bring over Blackwater/Academi/XE mercs in a trickle lest he be accused of simply transferring his U.S.-based company somewhere else – which is basically what he did.
So the third big organization (Not-Prince’s big UAE contract):
UAE Foreign Legion Mercs (or whatever they call themselves)
This is technically not R2 but a dedicated UAE merc group that reports directly to the Crown Prince. It was created and managed by R2 on behalf of their client: the UAE. These are head-chopper-like mercs (just like regular R2 mercs) that the UAE sends out for its dirty work in Yemen (and Libya, Syria and God knows where else). Not-Prince originally only recruited non-Muslims because he felt a Muslim would be hesitant to kill another Muslim. He recruited mostly from Colombia and South Africa, but attracted plenty of the usual western merc rabble as well. It originally started as a single battalion of 800 and was reportedly expanded to 2,400 (brigade?) a year or two ago. Their base is also in the UAE, but not at the R2 base.
The R2 not-connected-to-Blackwater-in-any-way part claimed by not-Prince and their creation/management of the UAE Foreign Legion confuses everyone. Especially in Yemen where apparently all three of the above operate: the UAE Presidential Guard, R2 mercs and the UAE Foreign Legion. Here is one example of how the press mangles their reports, confusing all three and still often labeling all of them as ‘Blackwater’ troops:
Houthi media: 80 Saudi troops, including 42 Blackwater, killed in Yemen ballistic missile attack
This is a rather interesting piece of info from that article that shows how deep the rabbit hole goes. It details the destruction of a Houthi Tochka ballistic missile fired at Hadi-loyalist forces base:

“…The surface-to-surface missile also destroyed two Patriot missile systems, three Apache helicopters, more than 50 military vehicles, all belonging to the US Blackwater Worldwide security services company…”

So I guess the U.S. sells Patriot missile batteries and Apaches to R2 to kill Yemenis. Who would have thought? See how easy it is for the CIA/DoD to evade the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, U.S. Congressional oversight and International Law? Arm up R2 and contract them to do your dirty work. Maybe the report was inaccurate about who owns what, but it wouldn’t surprise me one bit if R2 actually does have U.S. Patriots and Apaches in Yemen.
Welcome to the new and improved Constitution-free U.S.A. v2.0

Posted by: PavewayIV | Nov 13 2016 5:19 utc | 167

@168 PW
Aren’t Patriot missiles supposed to protect military assets, to shoot down Tochka’s, not be destroyed by them on the ground?
Mike Whitney posted a link to an article explaining the election to put with your choice … The real election surprise? The uprising of the American people … this one written before the election.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 13 2016 6:05 utc | 168

This is hog shit. Isis began with Napoleon, reemerged with Hitler, and finally had some success in Afghanistan. Does anyone seriously believe the west has changed its spots?

Posted by: low voltage | Nov 13 2016 6:10 utc | 169

@ PavewayIV who wrote: “Welcome to the new and improved Constitution-free U.S.A. v2.0”
But, as Obama said with a grin when he entered office and bailed out the private finance banksters, “It is all legal”.(sic)
It is only where they haven’t changed the laws yet to bypass the moral turpetitude legal concept that we force immigrants to profess that they do not violate.
Again from Wikipedia:

Moral turpitude is a legal concept in the United States and some other countries that refers to “conduct that is considered contrary to community standards of justice, honesty or good morals. This term appears in U.S. immigration law beginning in the 19th century.

Anyone else think that our community standards of justice, honesty and good morals are sinking to a new normal?

Posted by: psychohistorian | Nov 13 2016 6:14 utc | 170

1) Re: GCC SF ebedded with “rebels” in the ME – I wrote about it already months ago. Look carefully at those clips produced by Rita Katz SITE, where the executioners have always similar slim body, dark complexion, and always faces covered – why? As I said before – because they’re NATO, Israeli, GCC commandos, trained specificaly to commit the most heineous atrocities without a sliver of remorse.
2) Voltairenet cofirms my earlier supposition that Russia had paused its bombing in Syria in order not to influence negatively elections in the US, Preparation to liberate Aleppo

At least 10,000 Al-Qaeda jihadis under the command of the Saudi Sheikh Abdullah al-Muhaysini are currently occupying the Aleppo neighborhoods. Supported by the International Coalition which presents them as “Syrian revolutionaries” or “moderate rebels”, they are besieged by the Syrian Arab Army and Hezbollah, but continued to be supplied with tunnels until last week.
Despite repeated attempts by Russia to open two roads to allow both civilians and fighters to leave the city and retreat to Idleb, no one was able to get out of Aleppo where terror is exercised Of the Islamic Court. Civilians who attempted to join government areas were killed by jihadists.
While his staff was preparing to bomb the jihadists, President Putin asked him not to undertake anything until the end of the election campaign in the United States; With any Russian attack likely to favor the election of Hillary Clinton and thus plunge the world into a Third World Confrontation.
NATO took advantage of this truce to try to break the siege of Aleppo-East and send reinforcements. Located on the communication road, caught between the jihadists of Aleppo and their reinforcements, Hezbollah managed to hold its position.
The Syrian Arab army managed to destroy the tunnels. Jihadists and their civilian hostages no longer have food reserves.
The defense ministers of Syria, Russia, Iran and Hezbollah are expected to meet in the coming days and coordinate the imminent release of Aleppo. Given the kamikaze jihadists, the battle should first take the form of a powerful bombardment, while the land forces should hold their positions and make prisoners, if some jihadists surrender.
The liberation of East Aleppo will be followed by that of Idleb.

The desperation of the cabal, hit hard by Trump’s win, is sensible. Hence so many hasbara, NATO, GCC trolls have been attacking this blog over last few days.
2) Obama, Trump, and Sanders have been working together against Hitlary (to lead her into the trap she had to be 150% convinced she’d win) and her genecidal cabal, that Soros sponsoring the “purple revolution” now in the US aimed at overthrowing democratically elected president (eventhough the cabal rigged popular vote) is part of. We will be seeing more and more confirmations of this, they have to stop together invasion of primitive mob of Killary’s zombies. It’s very serious: Clintons and Soros Launch ‘Purple Revolution’ in America | Memory Hole

Defeated Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton is not about to «go quietly into that good night». On the morning after her surprising and unanticipated defeat at the hands of Republican Party upstart Donald Trump, Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, entered the ball room of the art-deco New Yorker hotel in midtown Manhattan and were both adorned in purple attire. The press immediately noticed the color and asked what it represented. Clinton spokespeople claimed it was to represent the coming together of Democratic «Blue America» and Republican «Red America» into a united purple blend. This statement was a complete ruse as is known by citizens of countries targeted in the past by the vile political operations of international hedge fund tycoon George Soros.
The Clintons, who both have received millions of dollars in campaign contributions and Clinton Foundation donations from Soros, were, in fact, helping to launch Soros’s «Purple Revolution» in America. The Purple Revolution will resist all efforts by the Trump administration to push back against the globalist policies of the Clintons and soon-to-be ex-President Barack Obama. The Purple Revolution will also seek to make the Trump administration a short one through Soros-style street protests and political disruption. [..]

It seems that the cabal got even to a prominent anti-imperial blogger AANGIRFAN, who started recently spewing absolutely outrageous, one-sided, brainless verbiage supporting Clinton, who butchered Syria, Libya, Iraq. Unspeakable evil shows its face.
3) @Ghost are you seriously so insane to claim that their polls – after we’ve seen how biased against Trump the lame-scream media have been, how they lied about imperial wars, conflicts, regime change operations – to be trusted ? That’s how milions of people felt just before the Nov 9:
Michael SnyderI hope that I am wrong.  On Tuesday night we will find out who our next president will be, and I have a very ominous feeling about what is going to happen.  But all around me there are people telling me that Trump is going to win.  They tell me to disregard the polls because they cannot be trusted, and that very well may be true.  They tell me […]

Posted by: ProPeace | Nov 13 2016 6:41 utc | 171

@PavewayIV | Nov 13, 2016 12:19:43 AM | 168 “the Crown Prince decided”
That stooge – like other puppets in AU, NZ, CA, SA,… – does not decide a sh*t. London does.

Posted by: ProPeace | Nov 13 2016 6:54 utc | 173

Why would DailyStar write about this? Illuminati Card Game Predicts Donald Trump Assassination

Posted by: ProPeace | Nov 13 2016 7:13 utc | 174

test

Posted by: Tom Murphy | Nov 13 2016 11:07 utc | 175

@172 PP
From your link above

There is absolutely no reason for Trump to seek the advice from old Republican fossils like Baker, Hadley, former Secretaries of State Rice and Powell, the lunatic former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton, and others. There are plenty of Trump supporters who have a wealth of experience in foreign and national security matters, including those of African, Haitian, Hispanic, and Arab descent and who are not neocons, who can fill Trump’s senior- and middle-level positions.

Trump picking foreign and national security advisers/ministers of “African, Haitian, Hispanic, and Arab descent”?
A transcript of your link, without having to go to the Trump site, clicking stupid pictures, cutting and pasting my fingerproint … if this is Peter Theil, I don’t want any.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 13 2016 11:18 utc | 176

@177
… a transcript of the Trump ad linked to in your link …

Posted by: jfl | Nov 13 2016 11:26 utc | 177

DT tells WJS he is willing to keep parts of Obamacare:
WSJ
(couldn’t read it paywall)
Yes, of course. DT had to make a point for his supporters that he would repeal ACA. He hammered hard on that. As DT supporters, and Republicans, are 85% against it, if for very diverse reasons. Plus, it is always easy to critisise and condemn any legislation of that type. ACA was passed by a slim 220-215.
The PDF appears to be almost 2,000 pages. Many articles were published about its length. (see ex.) One reason it became so confused imho is that the proposal/prelim version was published on the internet (I read large chunks) with the possibility of open commentary, as an Obama BS modernist inclusive move. The ginormous number of stakeholders, corps, lobbyists, agitators, legal eagles, HC ppl etc. fought it out – a recipe for disaster.
WaPo
The irony is that ACA was a sop to the insurance cos. / Finance – insurance and banking are part of the same cartel – and re-inforced ‘market principles’ along the lines of ‘competition’ and ‘choice’ (both often fake ..) are great. Which is DT’s line, clearly if roughly stated in the 2 sparse position texts I posted.
Obama was the ultimate third-wayer stooge and got away with it because .. America. The supposed ‘left, progressives’ sneakily in cahoots with banks and mega-corps.
The Repubs *publically* opposed: ‘mandatory insurance’ (where is individual choice?) as well as certain ‘subsidies’ — but were overridden by Supreme Court decisions (> Scalia’s role, inter alia.)
So DT faces a contradiction: ACA has ‘good’ parts (a bustling market!) and bad parts (‘limitations to freedom’ and to give him his due probably ‘too costly.’)
Nothing favorable will emerge from this hopeless confusion, these major contradictions. As I posted, DT needs to propose something ‘new’ and not a bis-repetita of the ACA.
Anecdote. Before ACA was well worked-out Obiman sent a team of experts, about 30 ppl, to Switz, as it’s the only ‘developed’ country that has all-private, *obligatory* HC. The experts were all “wow wonderful too cool” until they learnt that:
a) costs are Federally fixed by a mixed panel (medicos can charge more and patients can pay ++ if they wish but then the insurance does not reimburse), b) insurance cos. are tightly audited and controlled, and their admin costs can’t exceed x, c) dodgy ads or attractive offers are rigorously banned…d) more ..
When they got the picture they simply packed their bags and left!

Posted by: Noirette | Nov 13 2016 12:20 utc | 178

@jfl # 178:
You are completely oblivious to what is happening. If Trump were just another neoliberal puppet like Obama, Merkel and Hollande would not be lecturing him about Western values in their congratulation statements to him, and the NY Times and Guardian would not be saying that the US is no longer the leader of the free world, but Merkel. In an oligarchy, only an oligarch can launch a movement to overthrow the oligarchy and restore democracy.
Trump win spells doom for European Atlanticists

Merkel and Hollande’s pious reaction to Trump’s presidential win shows that these two leaders and their ruling circles still don’t get it. The implicit moralistic tone deprecating Trump’s supporters as “right-wing rabble” shows that the incumbent European rulers are missing the plot of what is happening.
True, elements of support for Trump and populist parties across Europe are tinged with reactionary racist and xenophobic views. But it is a grave mistake to simply dismiss them. The rise in opposition to economic globalization that has enriched the few while impoverishing the masses is correlated with opposition to rampant immigration of cheap labor. Economic globalization as ordained by the oligarchy is also correlated with illegal wars overseas for elite-driven regime change, which, in turn, has fed into an influx of refugees from war-torn countries.

With the current protests against Trump going on across the US, we see the Empire’s techniques for regime being applied to the heart of the Empire itself.

Posted by: Demian | Nov 13 2016 12:28 utc | 179

@180 d
Well, I can agree that:
1) it is a grave mistake to simply dismiss them [all the folks who voted Trump]. The rise in opposition to economic globalization that has enriched the few while impoverishing the masses is correlated with opposition to rampant immigration of cheap labor.
2) With the current protests against Trump going on across the US, we see the Empire’s techniques for regime being applied to the heart of the Empire itself.
And I can agree with the in-between,
1.5) Economic globalization as ordained by the oligarchy is also correlated with illegal wars overseas for elite-driven regime change, which, in turn, has fed into an influx of refugees from war-torn countries.
But I think that Trump is going to choose his battles and, perhaps, short-shrift the neo-con regime changes and the geopolitical wars, as needless, destructive expenditures, and work initially on his plans for
1) taxcuts for business and the wealthy.
2) privatizing education
3) new sanctions against those states, foreign and domestic, who don’t ‘play ball’.
4) state ‘investments’ (giveaways) in the fossil-fuel sector.
5) shoring up the MedIC after Obamas failure with Obamacare
6) shoring up the PIC (Prison Industrial Complex) via insuring a steady stream of foreign bodies – ‘illegals’ – and domestics – ‘crime, drugs, & violent’ convictions.
7) more funding for the MilIC and the NSA
8) selective enforcement of unspecified new ‘ethics reforms’
Forgive me if I seem too skeptical to you, but I’ve been through this before.
If he follows through with dropping the neo-cons’ regime change and outright aggressive operations – that will be good. Very good.
But domestic peace and light from Donald Trump – and with Republicans in control of the US House, US Senate, and US Supreme Court, and in 25 states with Republican Governors, Houses and Senates – is unlikely.
The new ‘purple’ revolution is de facto conservative though neo- rather than paleo- as Trump seems to be. He’ll try to stick with the basics – rich get richer, poor get poorer – but the pressure from those neos- with geopolitical ambitions will be there all the time. A lot of ‘progressives’ and ‘liberals’ derive their income from the GWOT and the world-wide spying machine, as do many, many ‘right-wing’ neo-cons as well, of course.
And all that’s if Trump doesn’t just tear up all his campaign promises, as is the usual course with US politicians.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 13 2016 14:06 utc | 180

@181
… I fully agree that domestic peace and light would be just as unlikely with the Democrats in charge to the same extent as the Republicans are now … please don’t think I’m any less anti-Demoblican than I am anti-Republicrat.

Posted by: jfl | Nov 13 2016 14:14 utc | 181

It seems the western Apex Elites are having a change of tactics as to the their overall strategic plan of running a one world government for fun and profit.It appears their policy of brinkmanship and instigating terrorist insurgencies for regime change has run up against a protagonist that won’t back down, meaning the continuation of such policies would result in disaster for their end goal plans. Plan B may be a financial and corporate infiltration of the Asian renaissance in cooperation with the Apex Elites of Russia and China in consideration that the hostile actions of plan A would result in failure of a successful outcome. Trump is their man on the spot in these negotiations. Or who needs the TPP when the “greatness” of the conditions in the far east can be recreated in America and throughout the west? On the domestic scene look for the privatization of anything that smells of money, like social security and what is left of the commons by the financial and corporate vultures of Wall Street. The real powers behind the new Trump administration. All the law has been put in place by previous administrations, as W.S. servants,to circumvent any pesky privileges the constitution formerly provided for. Or if you think you are going to protest the making of “America great again” (for who?) then the USA LLC and owners have a nice terrorist designation for you and a tanker parked in the middle of the Indian Ocean where you can protest all you want and not a soul will hear your screams, What’s this you say? You thought Trump was going to lead a fight against the globalists? Au contraire mon amie, Trump is advancing the globalist agenda by 25 years as the goal posts have been moved without your noticing. Gone is the “global warming” meme being used to advance globalism, to be replaced by the vision of the world as one giant sweatshop, as the western elites have seen the light held aloft by their eastern counterparts.

Posted by: BRF | Nov 13 2016 15:18 utc | 182

As an addendum: Also look for some form of global tax, global money, global policing and a global armed force to begin to materialize as this all goes forward, to be sold under the auspices of a U.N., that has the best interests of humanity and world citizenship in its altruistic heart and the gossip of ulterior motives driving all this by a corportocracy just conspiracy theory.

Posted by: BRF | Nov 13 2016 15:32 utc | 183

Trump does deals. He doesn’t give things away. So even if he is happy to let Russia continue to help SAA clean up in Syria, he will want something in return. Could this be the end of the two-state solution in Israel ? Trump is very close to Adelson and other ultra-Zionists who want to end the talk of the West Bank and Gaza. Sisi could be persuaded to take Gaza if enough money was put up, and absorbing the West Bank into Israel could be done, depending on the international profile.Clearly it would be messy, but achievable if other nations keep out of it. Syria has consistently stood up for the cause of Palestine, but what would Assad do if he was offered the Golan Heights as a sweetener in order to stay quiet over Judaea and Samaria ? There is no love lost between him and Hamas who have betrayed him and the prospect of retaining the integrity of Syria would be very tempting, but if he did this he would betray the loyalty and the hopes of the PFLP. Whatever is coming, don’t think Trump is going to roll over and suddenly become an Assad fanboy.

Posted by: anitele’a | Nov 13 2016 15:45 utc | 184

Demian @ 180.
The European Atlanticists are aaa scream! shriek! appalled — such a shock, catastrophic surprise. Moaning painfully, blundering about in hysterical confusion. (Never envisaged Trump would be elected. That is what they were told!)
They thought they had it made as they happily submitted to a higher power, or were forced to do so. To edge in their own lower-rank power, over their ppl, their mega-incomes and cushy lives would be guaranteed. Killary would support to the hilt!
Deal with the devil as low-man-on the pole often leads to extremely unpleasant consequences.
EU – PTB did not understand or learn that once you make deals with the Super-Power, or here Devil, (or submit) all bets are off and you are a potential future nobody, nothing, or even targetted victim. They don’t even grasp that submissiveness only buys so much until … interest is lost and ho-hum, maybe financial attacks + regime change occur. EU – PTB think they can devastate, murder, effect regime change, get brownie points awarded by the US.. see Lybia.
They are trying everything to shore up ‘Atlantic’ control via the EU and NATO.

Posted by: Noirette | Nov 13 2016 15:46 utc | 185

According to Al Jazeera 10 minutes ago the Syrian Govt is texting, and otherwise warning trapped Aleppo residents, that they have only 24 hours to flee before a large and unlimited military assault commences.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Nov 13 2016 15:48 utc | 186

PP @ 172
>> Clintons and Soros Launch ‘Purple Revolution’ in America
You give them far too much credit.
Trump said a lot of “stuff” that legitimately scares many. Those protests are minor ripples after a tumultuous election.
It’s DT’s show now, with a chance to demonstrate he’s really going to change some of the big things he has promised.
He will either drain-the-swamp, or cultivate it. Time will tell.
He’s got a lot to prove.

Posted by: jdmckay | Nov 13 2016 15:56 utc | 187

@ Paveway 168.
Thank you. That reminded me of the Russian missile attack on a “Coalition intelligence” operation in Syria that killed US, Brit, Turk, Saudi, and Qatari (and Mossad) advisers. That story didn’t get much traction beyond limited sources like Iran Fars, Russia, and Times of Israel. Probable?
As to Popular Vote, Trump took the Popular Vote in every state he won. That was the intention of those who created the Electoral College – to prevent the largest states (like CA and NY) from swamping the smaller ones.

Posted by: Curtis | Nov 13 2016 16:08 utc | 188

@Noirette #179:
I think you read Obamacare absolutely right.
I think the best thing to do would be to abolish Obamacare and just add everyone to Medicare, since the program already exists and works well.
But Trump says he prefers private sector to public sector solutions. Still, it took a Republican to open relations with China…

Posted by: Demian | Nov 13 2016 16:14 utc | 189

@Noirette,
Thanks for the story about the US folks coming to see how the Swiss health care system works. I wish more could understand that having unfettered greed in the middle of providing health care should be regulated against….or, IMO, eliminated from being in the middle.
The arguments in the US about public versus private are so specious. How you insert profit into finance, health care, education, etc. and get better outcomes is ludicrous on the face of it, let alone looking deeper. But then we have economists, who betray their humanity by building models of myth to show us how to obfuscate reality in all these “markets”. IMO , we just need better government instead of the myth that private folks provide better results.

Posted by: psychohistorian | Nov 13 2016 16:26 utc | 190

Ken Nari @ 126
pnyx @ 114 “Tronald lost the popular vote by over 1 Million votes”
“Source please.”
Well, this for instance: http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-there-are-more-than-4-million-ballots-1478828215-htmlstory.html

Posted by: Pnyx | Nov 13 2016 16:28 utc | 191

For French speakers, AMAZING video
http://www.pauljorion.com/blog/2016/11/12/hysterie-collective-autour-de-donald-trump-mise-au-point/
(sorry for the others! learning a bew language is never a bad idea!)

Posted by: Mina | Nov 13 2016 17:24 utc | 192

Another possible attempt to better the Obama legacy? Meeting between NZ politicians and Kerry in Wellington (just had a 7.5 earthquake east coast of the South Island, which has affected Wellington but maybe Kerry already departed) – bringing up two state solution for Israel/Palestine at the UN, reported at nzherald.co.nz
Article points out that Israeli settlements are an obstacle. Be safe, kiwis.

Posted by: juliania | Nov 13 2016 18:41 utc | 193

The OFAC has largely ignored the way ISIS was financed via looted oil. ISIS (as ISIL) was first introduced on its list in 2015 which just happens to coincide when Russian started bombing the shit of the ISIS oil smuggling infrastructure. The amount it claims was involved is also laughable – about $130 million. The Iranian Quds Force (involved in destroying ISIS) was also included at the same time, listed at $14 billion in assets. Following Trump’s election, it has included al Nusra as a designated organisation. These actions of OFAC against ISIS et al are clearly retrospective ass-covering exercises. Maybe Trump should call in the Director of OFAC to explain their abject failure in tracking and interdicting ISIS assets (/sarc)
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Pages/terror.aspx

Posted by: Yonatan | Nov 13 2016 19:12 utc | 194

With all the naked reactionaries being lined up for foreign policy posts in the Trump administrations from John Bolton to Walid Phares, you people will have your hands filled for the next four years justifying all sorts of reactionary politics but then again that’s what you are good at.

Posted by: Louis Proyect | Nov 13 2016 19:14 utc | 195

Discours sympa, Mina re 191. But rather the idealism of the young. For non-French-speakers she says the world goes badly. Things have to change. Trump is only a symptom.
She’s right of course. Trump is only a symptom (along with Brexit). She would do better to understand that we are in a quasi-revolutionary situation. Perhaps somewhat like 1848. The PTB will no doubt double down and retake power (probably by Trump’s appointments, but perhaps by assassination), but a statement has been made. More rubbishing of the white working class, and there’ll be a real revolution.

Posted by: Laguerre | Nov 13 2016 19:24 utc | 196


(sorry for the others! learning a bew language is never a bad idea!)
Posted by: Mina | Nov 13, 2016 12:24:43 PM | 191

Neither is providing a whiff of an inkling re the content of an indecipherable link you’re in such a rush to dump…no matter how Bewt you think it is.
Apart from anything else it looks like Click Bait…

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Nov 13 2016 19:24 utc | 197

“Besides, with George Soros backing these riots protesting Trump’s election, we might have an American color revolution before Trump takes office.”
So funny to see all this solidarity with Trump here. When cops begin to escalate their death squad tactics against Black youth, Trump will surely have their back. And you people will defend Trump to the hilt in the same way that RT.com will. This is the Red-Brown alliance in all its splendor even though it is doubtful that any of you are the least bit Red.

Posted by: Louis Proyect | Nov 13 2016 19:26 utc | 198

“That was the intention of those who created the Electoral College – to prevent the largest states (like CA and NY) from swamping the smaller ones.”
No, it wasn’t. It was created to reinforce slavery:
In a direct election system, the South would have lost every time because a huge percentage of its population was slaves, and slaves couldn’t vote. But an Electoral College allows states to count slaves, albeit at a discount (the three-fifths clause), and that’s what gave the South the inside track in presidential elections. “And thus it’s no surprise that eight of the first nine presidential races were won by a Virginian. (Virginia was the most populous state at the time, and had a massive slave population that boosted its electoral vote count.)”
This pro-slavery compromise was not clear to everyone when the Constitution was adopted, but it was clearly evident to everyone when the Electoral College was amended after the Jefferson-Adams contest of 1796 and 1800. These elections were decided, in large part, by the extra electoral votes created by slavery. Without the 13 extra electoral votes created by Southern slavery, John Adams would’ve won even in 1800, and every federalist knows that after the election.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/12/13598316/donald-trump-electoral-college-slavery-akhil-reed-amar

Posted by: Louis Proyect | Nov 13 2016 19:29 utc | 199

For Laguerre: she ‘s in with the revolutionary option, has been working with Melenchon but like all the best people, has quit him. Too narcissic.
It’s a relief too see at least a few people in France are fed up with this hypocritical hysteria. No problem with Duterte, with Erdogan, with the Sauds, but from Hollande to von Leyen, Merkle, and now NATO, everyone has a moral lesson to give Trump. I think they fail to see that a US campaign is just a match of catch wrestling where the winner is known to get serious when in office (plus the counterpowers exist, unlike France). And what they miss even more is that their abnoxious attitude will definitely help Marine Le Pen. Unfortunately.

Posted by: Mina | Nov 13 2016 19:35 utc | 200