Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 19, 2016
Syria – After Detours U.S. Finally Agrees To Russian Ceasefire Plan

The recent talk between the Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov and Secretary of State Kerry brought some progress. The U.S. was so far not willing to agree to a real ceasefire in Syria and persisted on a lower level "cessation of hostility" agreement. This now changed. The U.S., for the first time, agreed to proceed towards a full ceasefire between its proxy forces in Syria and the Syrian government and its allies. In the press availability after the Tuesday talks Kerry said:

[T]oday, we believe we moved the ball forward in some ways, and I’ll say specifically.

First, we pledged our support for transforming the cessation of hostilities into a comprehensive ceasefire. And we committed to use our influence to use the parties to the cessation in order to ensure compliance.

Second, we agreed that if a party to the cessation of hostilities engages in a pattern of persistent noncompliance, the task force can refer that behavior to the ISSG ministers or those designated by the ministers to determine appropriate action, including the exclusion of such parties from the arrangements of the cessation. Interpreted directly, that means that if they continue to do it and they’re pretending to be part of the cessation and they’re not, they could be subject to no longer being part of the cessation immediately.

Those last sentences are mainly directed at Ahrar al Sham which never signed the cessation agreement but claimed to be part of it while continuing its attack on Syrian government forces and civilians. Kerry is conceding to the Russian standpoint that Ahrar, by its action, is a terrorist group that needs to be fought down.

Fourth, we call on all parties to the cessation of hostilities to disassociate themselves physically and politically from Daesh and al-Nusrah and to endorse the intensified efforts by the United States and Russia to develop shared understandings of the threat posed and the delineation of the territory that is controlled by Daesh and al-Nusrah and to consider ways to deal decisively with terrorist groups.

Kerry had agreed to this position on al-Qaeda ad the Islamic State in earlier talks but later retracted with weak excuses that "intermingling" between al-Qaeda and "moderate rebels" made fighting al-Qaeda nearly impossible. That "intermingling" is no longer an excuse. The U.S. now agreed that Russia and the Syrian government will fight al-Qaeda and that any other groups standing nearby and getting hit have only themselves to blame.

By the way, the New York Times account of the talks and the press conference by chief manipulator David Sanger are waaay off from what was really said.

The "cessation of violence" has held up quite well since the end of February. The south is mostly quite and there are only few hotspots elsewhere where fighting still flares up. Over 100 settlements and their local forces have, with Russian mediation, signed ceasefire agreements with the government.

There is also a new, deeper level of Russian and U.S. cooperation of Syria and on fighting al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. A common rough plan was agreed upon to attack and eliminate both group. As part of this plan Iraqi forces under U.S. control attacked and occupied Rutba in west Iraq. Rutba, part of Anbar province, controls much of the open land and desert in the triangle of the Iraqi, Jordan and Syrian border. This move cuts off the southern route that connected the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. The Syrian/Russian part of this move will be the liberation of Deir Ezzor in south-east Syria in the upcoming months. An attack on the Islamic State held Raqqa will only follow later on after a large concentration of force is made possible.

There are a few other active flashpoints in Syria. In East Ghouta, east of Damascus city, the Saudi sponsored Salafists of Jaish al-Islam are fighting groups once supplied by the CIA and now associated with al-Qaeda/Jabhat al Nusra for control of the area. This fight is already part of the disassociation from Nusra that the U.S. agreed upon. But the fighting is bloody with at least 500 losses on both sides during the last weeks. The Syrian army is the laughing third party in this and today took a significant part of the south of the East-Ghouta pocket.

The rebel part of Aleppo city, controlled by al-Qaeda, is now cut off from its only supply line. Improvised rockets from the rebel side are daily hitting civilians in the densely populated government held side. To eliminate the now besieged al-Qaeda in east Aleppo city will be a very bloody and destructive fight that might take months.

In the north Turkish supported "moderate rebels" still try to move towards east along the Turkish-Syrian border to eliminate the Islamic State access there. But each time they announce to have taken this or that town away from IS, a counterattack follows and IS regains its positions. This infighting between hostile forces is again to the advantage of the Syrian government.

Around Palmyra the Islamic State has made some surprise attacks on the Shear oil field and the T-4 military airport on the western road to Palmyra. There was, according to unofficial sources, some significant damage to Syrian and Russia material on the air base but no news about the incident was published. The advances the Islamic State made in area have by now, with significant Russian help, all been reversed. Following a consolidation phase a renewed push from Palmyra eastward to Deir Ezzor is expected.

Hizbullah has pulled back all troops for the Aleppo area where they were replaced by Iranian forces. It is unwilling to commit additional forces just to move some ceasefire lines a few miles back or forth. It continues its engagement around Damascus and in the border region to Lebanon with IS and al-Qaeda being the main targets.

Russia, Iran, Hizbullah and the Syrian government are all aware that the U.S. is "flexible" with its interpretation of agreements and tends to cheat whenever it believes that it can do so to its own advantage. They are fully prepared to respond and escalate again should the U.S. proxy forces divert from the new agreements or should some significant other changes on the battlefield occur.

Comments

@From The Hague.
Have you seen any “damaged” MiG-25 aircraft at Russian base in Syria? My humble idea is that when clearing the airfield and its surroundings no junk would have been left. But again, whatever floats your boat–I have no desire to discuss the obvious BS propagated by STRATFOR and debunked earlier today by those who actually operate that base and who already stated that the photos are from BEFORE Russia based its forces there.

Posted by: SmoothieX12 | May 24 2016 16:56 utc | 101

@ SmoothieX12
Relax, the point is that b took it seriously.
And he earns a respectful reply.
And I’m glad I have doubt now about the news of Stratfor.
http://visitwinchestervirginia.com/losses-among-the-personnel-of-the-russian-base-in-syria-no/

Posted by: From The Hague | May 24 2016 17:14 utc | 102

@From The Hague.
I am not tense. But knowing a prolific work and a very decent reputation (and deservedly so) MOA has in alternative (soon to become mainstream, hopefully) media it is highly desirable to be more selective, especially when such organizations as STRATFOR are involved. But it is my strictly personal opinion and I could be wrong. As Konashenkov said today:
“авторство слухов об уничтожении подразделения российских боевых вертолетов и двух десятков грузовиков принадлежит пропагандистам ИГИЛ (прежнее название запрещенной в РФ группировки “Исламское государство”), которые безуспешно пытались “продать” эту якобы “новость” около десяти дней назад”.
“Что касается фотоснимков сирийской авиабазы, то сожженная авиа- и автомобильная техника, а также многочисленные воронки от разрыва реактивных снарядов присутствуют там уже не первый месяц. Это результат упорных боев за данный аэродром сирийских правительственных войск и боевиков террористических формирований”
Google translate will do a good job.

Posted by: SmoothieX12 | May 24 2016 17:18 utc | 103

@smoothie and etc.. thanks for the updates on this.. here is the translation for others including smoothie to see from @103… i never did trust stratfor… this is another fine example..
“The authorship of rumours and the destruction of the units of the Russian military helicopters and two dozens of trucks belongs to the advocates ИГИЛ (formerly called prohibited in the Russian Federation the factions of the Islamic State”), which unsuccessfully tried to “sell” the alleged “news” about ten days ago.”
“With regard to the pictures of the Syrian military airbase, Scorched Rusalka deals airline and automotive technology, as well as numerous funnel from the gap rockets are not the first month. This is the result of the thrust of the fighting for the airfield of the Syrian Government troops and militia terrorist formations”

Posted by: james | May 24 2016 19:24 utc | 104

My recollection is that satellite photos usually have the date superimposed, in white or black characters, somewhere within the image. One assumes that such date-stamping can be toggled ON or OFF (same as on an ordinary digital camera). When I see an ‘important’ photo, legitimising a date-sensitive story, with a superimposed date label, and no sign of the satellite’s own date stamp, my bs detector asks “How come?”
I also don’t buy the story that a Russian base, in Syria, wouldn’t include detection and retaliation measures. The sat-pic shows the result of a sustained high-precision attack during which more than 2 dozen valuable vehicles were destroyed and a jet fighter severely damaged. The base clearly wasn’t adequately defended when the attack took place (whenever that might have been).

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | May 24 2016 22:44 utc | 105

The sunlight shadows cast by buildings and other objects, at a known location, can be used to determine an approximate time of day AND season (date). Even an amateur astronomer would be able to cross-check the claimed date with the actual date by examining the pattern of shadows.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | May 24 2016 22:57 utc | 106

In retrospect: Thank you SmoothieX12 on valuable information, both abstract and concrete.

Posted by: From The Hague | May 25 2016 18:13 utc | 107

MOKSHASTOCKS Stock Market / Commodities Advisory Company , MCX TIPS STOCKS TIPS,NCDEX TIPS ,COMEX TIPS
http://www.mokshastocks.com

Posted by: mokshastocks | Jun 10 2016 6:38 utc | 108