Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 4, 2016
The Saudi War On Everything Iran May Bounce Back As New Houthi Missile

I still believe that, from the Saudi rulers viewpoint, the execution of a bunch of al-Qaeda types and the Saudi Shia rabble-rouser Nimr Baqr al-Nimr was a smart move to divert the attention of their people from the accumulating problems of their rulers and the recent 40% gas price hike. But it comes with now escalating costs.

The biggest danger to the al-Saud family which dictatorial rules over Saudi Arabia is the proven validity of an alternative Islamic system. The Islamic Republic of Iran has such an alternative system and its reintegration into the world after the nuclear deal shows its validity. Some people and Islamic scholars in Saudi Arabia might get the idea that they also could also have a system where every vote counts and policies are decided at the ballot box. This without a kleptocratic, dictatorial family and, importantly, without doing away with their core Islamic values. This, not religion, is why the Saudis have fought Iran since its revolution in 1979 and why they try to curb its influence wherever they can. The al-Sauds fear for their family and its sinecures.

The Saudis, together with Israel, tried everything to sabotage the nuclear deal. They want Iran back in the isolation box. But it is now too late. I have not read one piece in "western" media today that was negative on Iran and/or positive on Saudi Arabia. The wind of international politics has changed and it is now Saudi Arabia that comes under pressure. The impulsive reaction of the current Saudi rulers is to escalate and escalate even more and to fight Iran wherever it is present, like in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, or even where it is not present like in Yemen.

While the Saudis claim that Iran supports the Houthis in Yemen there is not the slightest proof for that assertion. There have been no Iranians found in Yemen and no Iranian weapons. The Houthis the Saudis fight in Yemen are not Shia like the Iranians but are nearer to Sunni Islam than to Iranian 12er Shia. There has been no evidence that Houthis have received anything from Iran and all stories about Iranian weapon shipment to Yemen turned out to be false.

This is now likely to change.

After the killing of al-Nimr some Iranian hardliners organized a mob that stormed and ransacked the Saudi embassy in Tehran. This was an attack on what they see as appeasement policies of the Iranian President Rouhani. It was stupid of the Rouhani administration to not have foreseen such a move and increase protection for the embassy. It is now bending over backwards to apologize for the incident but to no avail.

The Saudis cut diplomatic relations to Iran and pressed Bahrain and Sudan to do the same. The Bahraini rulers need Saudi protection and Sudan the Saudi money. The UAE only lowered its diplomatic presence in Tehran from ambassador to chargé d'affaires. Interestingly the other Gulf countries did not follow the Saudi decision. The Saudis also stopped all civil flights between Iran and Saudi Arabia and forbid their citizens to visit Iran. Business between the countries will be stopped. Iranians on pilgrimage to Mecca are still welcome.

It is unclear what this is supposed to achieve. What could Iran reasonably do that would let the Saudi rulers retract these measures without losing face? This was another impulsive and erratic move that only hurts the Saudis people and the ruling family's international reputation.

More dumb moves are expected. The Saudis will likely up their proxy fight against Iran in Syria and possibly also in Iraq by giving more weapons and financial support to Jihadists of all strife. A new government in Lebanon, on which Iran and Saudi Arabia had recently agreed, is now again far away. The Saudis will also try to escalate the fight against the Houthis and their imaginary Iranian support in Yemen. But after nine month of bombing Yemen's infrastructure to dust there is little to escalate. All ground attacks by the Saudis and their various hired proxies have been fought to a standstill.

This then is the place where Iran can escalate in response. It has the technology and know how to hand the Houthis some serious missile capabilities. Such missiles would allow them to achieve pinpoint hits on Saudi targets. The whole southern Saudi Arabia would then become a Houthi shooting range. Saudi Arabia would have to file for peace or would have to evacuate significant parts of the country.

The al-Nimr execution and the diversion of the Saudi public to strife with Iran will help the Saudi rulers to calm down internal disturbances. But the escalation comes at significant international political costs and may end up, via Houthi missiles, to increase the internal problems the Saudis are so keen to avert in the first place.

Comments

@Lozion@96
Can any of you recommend a good blog/site following the events in Yemen? With the media blackout it is very hard to find out was is really going on on the ground.. Txs.
Try the Russian Defense Forum, they have two sections on Yemen, Yemeni Conflict: News, and Yemeni Conflict: News #2.
There is very little news on Yemen, and I don’t know of any bloggers following Yemen per se. Hope that helps.

Posted by: Lone Wolf | Jan 6 2016 14:34 utc | 101

@metni@98
Just to lend an additional comment to your reasonable observation, the escalating sectarian Sunni-Shiite conflict you mention has itself been both an objective and by-product of engineered US foreign policy. Further efforts devoted at tightening our embrace of the House of Saud is less a choice than a consummation of an existing Faustian bargain. Iran is the perennialy demonized poster child of the Neoconservative cabal whose worldview is immersed in the hubris of imperial exceptionalism. And despite leaving behind a succession of disastrous policy failures, the delusional architects of regime change continue to exert disproportionate influence. It leads one to the conclusion that as a nation, we just don’t seem to get it. The lack of real journalism, supplanted by a cadre of military-industrial corporate scribes has helped cultivate a coast-to-coast rabble of flag – waving “sheeple”. Our country is in deep trouble and perhaps I am being overly pessimistic in the belief that neither the fourth estate nor any other institution is currently willing or able to pose a serious challenge that might help shift the present course away from a rendezvous with disaster.
Excellent post, metni. I copied it in its entirety so it is read again on this page. You are correct on your assessment of the Deep State-orchestrated Shia-Sunni conflict, being “both an objective and by-product of engineered US foreign policy.”
There is no Sunni-Shia conflict but a manipulation of a not-so Muslim doctrine, Salafism, in order to create a conflict with the geopolitical purpose of destroying the Shia Axis of Resistance. Millions if not billions of Sunni Muslism lead a life in peace with their Shia brothers anywhere else in the world, except where the Saudis have build madrassas and paid tafkiris to attack Shiites, eg Pakistan et al.
And you are not being “overly pessimistic” about our future, not only the US but the future of the West as a whole. I posted a comment in the new thread with a different take but same conclusive pessimism.
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/01/contrary-to-media-claims-us-always-supports-its-saudi-clients.html#c6a00d8341c640e53ef01b7c80334e3970b

Posted by: Lone Wolf | Jan 6 2016 14:54 utc | 102

@LoneWolf@102
Your opinions and the buttressing of these views are much valued. Thank you.

Posted by: metni | Jan 6 2016 15:01 utc | 103

100
The expletive in your line doesn’t strengthen the statement
i beg to differ. added emphasis, you know

Posted by: john | Jan 6 2016 15:21 utc | 104

@101
Txs LF for the Yemen links. I hadnt thought the Houthis had inflicted that much dommage to KSA’s coalition.
Good, very good, let them waddle and drown in their own made quagmire. Interesting to note the longer Syria resists the more its enemies find themselves suffering the consequences of their acts (KSA/Turkey).
Blowback.

Posted by: Lozion | Jan 7 2016 3:00 utc | 105

If I had to pick a side I would rather have Shias as our friends then the saudi nut jobs …
After all they are the cause of all the problems. We should not forget most of the terrorists who were involved in the 911 were saudi… Even if you look at the far history, it was the sunnis who joined the crusades against the Christians not the Shias. Shias were always remained friends with the Jews and the Christians and protected them against the Sunnis. Today the history is repeating, it is the Shias who protect the Christians, Kurd’s and Yazidis against the isis. What do saudis and their friends do on the other hand is to feed isis and daesh with money and weapons.

Posted by: Orlando Local News | Jan 7 2016 10:10 utc | 106

@Orlando local News:
If I had to pick a side I would rather have Shias as our friends then the saudi nut jobs …
Your choice is the same as mine.

Posted by: metni | Jan 7 2016 23:34 utc | 107

@106/107.. the freaks at neo con central thought they would mix it up a bit for a change.. you know – up is down and down is up basically..

Posted by: james | Jan 8 2016 0:34 utc | 108