Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
May 29, 2015
Imperial NYT: Each FIFA Member One Secret Vote Is “Strange Electoral Math”

The New York Times was tipped off about last weeks U.S. induced Swiss police raid on FIFA functionaries in Geneva. It seems to hold some grudge against the football association maybe because the U.S. lost its bid for the World Cup 2022 to Qatar.

It is obvious that the U.S. is trying to install its own puppet on top of FIFA. Their candidate is a member of the corrupt family of Jordanian king. It is not that the U.S. is against corruption. How would the situation be today if FIFA, like some huge banks, had given to the Clinton Foundation, Obama's presidential library or "lobbied" some Representatives and Senators?  Corruption is just fine in the U.S. as long as it works in its interest. But FIFA rules make it difficult for the U.S. to get its will.

The reason, says the New York Times, is "the strange electoral math of FIFA".

So what is strange with that math?

The members of FIFA are the national football associations. Each gets one vote. The voting is secret.

Imagine that. Every member has an equal vote and can vote as it likes without any real way to pressure it. That's strange? From the NYT piece:

Mr. Blatter is widely expected to win a fifth term on Friday — in a vote only miles from the luxury hotel where Wednesday’s arrests took place — in part because of FIFA’s electoral math. The FIFA president is elected by a one-vote-per-country poll of its 209 member federations, making the many smaller countries who support Mr. Blatter an effective counterweight to his unpopularity elsewhere, most notably in Europe.

One country one vote is indeed strange math. Imagine the UN would be run this way. How would the U.S. and other Security Council members get their will if every country had a real vote?

There is no proposal in the NYT piece on how to change that strange math. How would the U.S. like to have the votes arranged? Countries ranked by population numbers? China, India, Nigeria, Brazil would certainly love that arrangement. But their votes would likely not go the way the U.S. wants them to go. Countries'  votes ranked by local football popularity or historic football success? Portugal or some other small country might then have the greatest weight. The U.S. vote would rank somewhere at the very end of the list.

No. There is no better way to run FIFA than the way it is run today. A World Cup is a billion dollar business. The money collected by FIFA through TV licenses, advertisement and merchandizing is flowing back to the national soccer federations. They are supposed to use it to support and promote the sport. Unfortunately some corruption is inevitably involved in such a huge and complex business. The world will have to live with that. The alternative is to relinquish control over football to some totally unaccountable, likely U.S. controlled conglomerate. That would be the end of the game.

I suggested that the U.S. assault on FIFA for corruption cases going back to the early 1990s comes now  because FIFA will today vote on a Palestinian proposal to eject Israel for impeding Palestinian football. Taking the 2018 World Cup from Russia is a convenient but secondary target. Israel has conceded that it is guilty of hindering Palestinian football by offering concessions in bid 
to avert vote to oust it from FIFA. But those concessions are likely not enough:

The source said FIFA president Sepp Blatter welcomed Israel’s proposal but stressed it would need [chairman of the Palestinian Football Association] Rajoub’s consent before removing the vote on banning Israel from FIFA’s slate.

The source said Rajoub acceded, but added another demand – that FIFA ask UN Secretary Ban Ki-moon to issue a decision within three months on whether the five Israeli teams based in West Bank settlements were within Israeli territory.

FIFA regulations stipulate that teams not located within Israeli territory require the Palestinians’ consent to participate in Israeli leagues. Since the UN does not recognize the West Bank as part of Israel, the decision would de facto force Israel’s soccer federation to expel these teams from the league or run the risk of breaking FIFA’s rules.

The Palestinians should stick to this demand. Israel, like apartheid South Africa, should be kicked out of FIFA. There must be no tolerance for racism and occupation in the world's most beloved sport.

Comments

Blatter will be re-elected in 2nd round of voting which requires a simple majority. First round Blatter 133 votes Jordanian prince Ali bin al-Hussein 73 votes. FIFA stays corrupt coming years …
Posted by: Oui | May 29, 2015 1:09:13 PM | 27

Nice call. An oracle you are not. You did oui oui in your pants.

Posted by: Spankume Tillet Hirtz | Jun 2 2015 18:22 utc | 101

100
In your dreams maybe.

Posted by: Anonymous | Jun 2 2015 18:41 utc | 102

I have no idea why Blatter suddenly resigned. Does this mean the US gets to pick the next President of FIFA? If so, then it looks like Russia will not be hosting the next World Games. The incredible power of US finance. Not to mention the incredible power of Zionist finance.
I wait in fascination to see what happens next. Israel will strut its power over the rest of the world to be sure. Those poor former colonies of western imperialism must very frightened today. Somehow I think this has something to do with BRICS growing power and the growth of the Eurasian alliance being led by China and Russia. Just a little shot over the bow to let them know where the real power resides.

Posted by: ToivoS | Jun 3 2015 4:33 utc | 103

Toivos
Of course the games wont be stopped, who they will elect depends on which candidates there finally is.

Posted by: Anonymous | Jun 3 2015 6:44 utc | 104

The 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia won’t be moved … perhaps some Anglo-Saxon countries may boycott the games by not participating. Some US sponsors may come under political pressure. The foolish Qatar games in 2022 may suffer if extensive bribery can be proven. Both FIFA and Qatar have donated funds to the Clinton Foundation … some compensation for swiping the games from the USA with Bill Clinton as big cheerleader.

Posted by: Oui | Jun 3 2015 8:24 utc | 105

Sepp’s work is far from over. He needs the time to ensure he gets the numbers together to get a new President who is credible and will continue the work of Fifa.
That is to use the money raised by the world cup to develop football in so-called ‘developing’ countries.
Otherwise if Prince Ali the Jordanian puppet gets elected, all of the money will simply be moved from one corporate pocket to another. That is what Uefa and amerika want.
Instead of the funds being spread about (where admittedly there was some ‘spillage but > 0.25% $10 million out of $440 million of the SA world cup budget was allegedly siphoned off hardly gross larceny even if true)the money will stay within the northern whitefella nexus.
Oh I’m sure few ‘rules’ will be broken but by the same token the money will be alleged to ‘trickle down’ from the wealthy corporations given contracts ‘for development’ to the kids stuck in slums of mega cities. Uefa is opposed to the grassroots way of funding from the bottom up which is the current Fifa methodology.
Undoubtedly Blatter & Co had their flaws but in the main their hearts were in the right place – that was their undoing – there is no place for old school socialists, not even champagne socialists like those on the Fifa executive, according to 21st century neoliberals.
I’m no football fan (prefer sports with more body contact) but there is also no doubt that the Fifa model has been successful – too successful for the likes of Uefa who have teams in their national league which feature footballing geniuses emanating from Africa, the Middle East and Latin America.
The trouble as far as Uefa is concerned is that the World Cup finals which were once Europe plus Argentina & Brazil, have become much more varied and consequently more difficult to win.
Nevertheless Uefa nations are still dominating winning the thing, because the old adage “a champion team will beat a team of champions” still holds true. The European national teams can build teams in a way that is much more difficult for those nations whose best players play on the other side of the world in the European leagues. Indeed it can be difficult for some poorer national sides to persuade star players to come home.
There has long been suspicion that some of the rich European clubs lean heavily on ‘foreign’ players who want to play for their own nation. The clubs come to regard such players as their personal property – slaves – albeit well paid slaves.
These issues are the sorts of things that Uefa hopes to counter. England for example spends vast sums in their attempt to build a strong national side, yet they have been incredibly unsuccessful; so for England who cannot find 11 great players who will form a great team, it probably seems easier to prevent other nations from doing so, than continuing to attempt something which for them seems impossible.
It seems incredible that England cannot put a team together and one has to wonder at the corruption in their own structure – yet we can also be sure that however corrupt that is, most of it will be ‘legal’ corruption.
Ahh the neoliberal epitome – how to steal without breaking the law.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jun 3 2015 9:27 utc | 106

DID at 106 — I like Aussie Rules Football myself, local PBS outlet carried it for a couple of seasons a while back, I got hooked (Collingwood FC; there’s a local town of the same name). Long kicking game fascinating. I wonder why Aussies don’t have a monopoly on NFL punting. But suffering withdrawal, no way to watch w/o paying some cable outlet.

Posted by: rufus magister | Jun 3 2015 12:10 utc | 107

DID @106 – Great stuff and sound analysis. Uefa and Platini … schooled by Blatter @FIFA, star of Juventus in Heysel drama and the Qatar bribes.

Posted by: Oui | Jun 3 2015 13:26 utc | 108

A policy adopted as far back as Franco’s sports minister Antonio Samaranch … interesting viewpoint.
Excellent debate on France24 … After Blatter: Can FIFA Clean Up Its Act?

Posted by: Oui | Jun 3 2015 18:23 utc | 109

Credit in this saga should go to the dogged obsession of a single reporter, Andrew Jennings, 71, who has traced Sepp Blatter’s footsteps for more than a decade. Jennings worked for the Sunday Times and BBC’s Panorama. His BBC film about Fifa corruption, The Beautiful Bung, appeared as long ago as 2006.
[Source: The Guardian]

Posted by: Oui | Jun 3 2015 18:23 utc | 110

In 2012 the Sunday Times revelations sparked a genuinely independent inquiry by a former US attorney, Michael Garcia. This report was delivered to Blatter, but he has refused to publish it in full. It contains criticisms of dealings between England’s Football Association and the ex-Fifa personality Jack Warner.

Posted by: Oui | Jun 3 2015 18:24 utc | 111

I’m intrigued by this attitude that FIFA isn’t corrupt. It’s a ‘non-profit’ that makes money in the billions; anyone who has ever worked for it knows that corruption has been an open secret for decades. There’s certainly a lot of politics involved in this, and the FBI shouldn’t be able to just arrest people on the streets of a foreign country, but that doesn’t change the fact that something like this has been a long time coming. And in fact the politics of it make it clear just how comically corrupt FIFA is. FIFA is incredibly low-hanging fruit, and by going after it Lynch and the Justice Department can both shove other stories from the headlines and make it look like they’re actually doing something of substance.

Posted by: Kelwar | Jun 3 2015 21:12 utc | 112