Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 23, 2014
Concealed By U.S. Airstrikes Israel Opens Nusra Path To Lebanon

Screenshot from the current NYT homepage:

The first piece is about the U.S. air attack last nights against various targets in east Syria. The second piece right next to it explains that such strikes in Iraq have had little effect. The juxtaposition demonstrates the futility of today's bombing campaign, part of the ongoing wars of proxy in Syria. As a result the Islamic State will only gain further legitimacy.

The U.S. and some "coalition" of Arab dictatorships bombed various targets related to the Islamic State in east Syria. The Syrian government was informed about the attack and did not overly protest against it.

The U.S. did not attack IS positions around the northern Syrian city Kobane where the IS is fighting against Kurdish militia in an attempt to open up a new logistic path for the IS to Turkey. Agreeing to this new logistic path was probably part of the price Turkey paid for recently getting its diplomats freed from IS internment.

The U.S. alone additionally bombed a target related to one specific part of Jabhat al-Nusra in north west Syria. It claims that it hit the "Khorasan group". But that groups is just a Pentagon FUD invention. It is nothing but the a segment of the long established leadership group of al Nusra. While ISIS had prepared for the announced U.S. air attacks and dispersed its personal and material Jabhat al-Nusra was unprepared and lost some 50 of its fighters. One of the Nusra leaders, Mohsen al-Fadli al-Kuwaiti, was killed in this attack.

Also today the Syrian airforce wanted to bomb Jabhat al-Nusra positions in the Golan heights where Nusra is, as first reported here, opening a corridor from Jordan towards Lebanon and for attacks on Damascus right along the demarcation line between Israel and Syria. Israel, in quite open support effort for the Nusra plan, shot down the Syrian SU-24 using U.S. provided Patriot missiles. While Israel claims that the plane violated its border the reported crash site was far from the border near Kanaker, Syria which is halfway between the demarcation line and Damascus.

Under the protection of the U.S. attack on IS and other targets Israel now practically established a no-fly-zone next to the Golan which will allow Jabhat al-Nusra to safely use the corridor and to attack Hizbullah in Qalamoun and in south Lebanon. It also opens space for new attacks on Damascus.

The U.S. attack on the IS in Syria will, as the NYT headlines express, have as little effect as such attacks have in Iraq. Without coordinating air attacks with a capable, available ground force like the Syrian army such strikes on IS will make no conceivable difference. I have yet to see any report that the U.S. planes have hit some of the major weapons or ammunition depots the IS captured from the Iraqi army. There are some 50 main battle tanks and lots of heavy artillery pieces in the hands of IS. What is done to disable those?

Comments

brian – i agree with @99 juannie, but it might be too late. your response to b strikes me as immature and thoughtless.

Posted by: james | Sep 25 2014 2:33 utc | 101


….
“That’s when I realized policy elites were controlling the narrative by ignoring mass movements.”
….
Posted by: okie farmer | Sep 24, 2014 2:14:03 PM | 93

A timely reminder that the policy elites claimed that Obama called off his 2013 Syria assault because he “listened to the American people” (and nothing whatsoever to do with Vlad scaring the shit out of them by blasting Obama’s Syria-bound cruise missiles out of the sky – from Russia).
[No Fly Zones R Us]?

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Sep 25 2014 4:51 utc | 102

to Cahokia @ 92
Present weakness of the revolutionary left far more complex than just aging boomers. Left was thrown out of the unions in the 50’s, unions destroyed with the flood of imported goods and abandoned by Democratic Party for Wall St. lucre. Relentless ideological pressure for “free markets,” i.e. oligopoly behind the “doublethink” of sm. town/business idealization. Concentration in the media and throughout industries. Working- and middle-class now too time- and cash-poor, and hence too timid, to speak up. Etc., etc. etc.
A paradox to consider — if Marxism is dead, why is the West still so relentlessly anti-communist? Look at the projection of fears onto Obama — if he’s not some sort of the “Muslim” than he’s the “Kenyan Mau-Mau socialist.”
I would certainly agree, however, that the Latin American left is far more vigorous and creative. And that support amongst progressives is less intense than back in the days of the Sandinistas. And correct me if I’m wrong, but I recollect the “Bolivarianism” Chavez promoted acknowledged certain borrowings from socialism?
to OK Farmer @ 93
Let me relate my exp. pre Gulf War I, in Boston — it was the only time I thought the counter-demo might attack. It was pretty clear at that time that Wash. had to bail out its Kuwaiti petro-dollar customers, so war was inevitable. Had the war drug on, the demo. would have been the opening phase of a larger anti-war movement, hopefully.
Regardless of the media coverage, or the attns. of the authorities, or the seeming prospects, that demo had to happen. Those sorts of mass action will always occur, they’re a natural social safety valve. They may become harder and in some senses riskier, but eventually people will speak out. One has to hope enough will speak soon enough, so onward.
On the bombings in Syria & Iraq —
Curiously, it has me thinking about the Ukraine. Would re-opening and extending hostilities in the middle east suggest a ratcheting down of tensions btw. Wash. & Moscow over Kiev and the Donbas? Or just a breather, during which US rearms, “trains” Ukr. for a renewed attack?

Posted by: rufus magister | Sep 26 2014 2:16 utc | 103

“but I recollect the “Bolivarianism” Chavez promoted acknowledged certain borrowings from socialism?”
Chavez was a proud socialist, and the coalition he brought to gether was called the PSUV – Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela. Most definitely socialist.
I believe we are seeing – in todays wars – the continued US attack on socialism more than anything. Certainly more than “terrorism” or “Islam”.
As you noted, we see it even at home. Internet forums like YouTube comments are a good place to look. People screaming that Communism is dead, yet still active trying to discredit it. Still using the same and worse tropes – largely fictions about “100 million murdered by Communism” and what not. Then, as you mentioned, the attacks on Obama. Popular Father Coughlin types, like Glenn Beck are obsessed with the issue.
Then look at foreign policy: at the countries on the USAs hit list – all socialist or formerly socialist. Syria, Ukraine, Russia, China, North Korea, Libya, Egypt, Ivory Coast, Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Yugoslavia … with few exceptions.
To a great degree, those countries still maintained some aspects of socialism, even Russia and Ukraine maintain, both socially and politically, large Communist Parties, social welfare states. And of course Russia’s reversing of the degradation of the 1990s and China’s meteoric rise (despite ridiculous claims that China, with her massive state-run industries and dominant Communist Party, is “capitalist”) are threats to the expansion of capitalism, the capitalists, sole goal, as Marx explained.
The fact is, Communism collapsed, but in many of these countries turned into social democracies, and still have powerful left blocs in them. Just look at voting patterns, even in Germany.
So, my hypothesis: All current US policy can be at least partially analyzed as the US “mopping up” after its Cold War victory. It aims to bring neoliberalism and imperialism to these holdouts, to bring them full bore, Indonesia-style super-capitalism.

Posted by: guest77 | Sep 27 2014 7:16 utc | 104

@104 is directed towards @103

Posted by: guest77 | Sep 27 2014 7:16 utc | 105

@guest77 104:
I believe the Kiev junta has banned the communist party. But I agree with everything else you say. But don’t blame the US alone for imposing neoliberalism on most of the world: it was Margaret Thatcher who said that “There is no alternative” and “There is no such thing as society.” I would say that neoliberalism is more deeply ingraned in the English than in the American psyche. American elites are simply greedy; English ideologues actually seem to believe that neoliberalism is a sound and beneficial doctriine.
A rare piece of good news: American evangelicals are becoming less Zionist.
Counterpunch: Christian Evangelicals Increasingly Support Palestinian Human Rights

Today, Brog writes, many of those 18 to 30 are “rebelling against what they perceive as the excessive biblical literalism and political conservatism of their parents. As they strive with a renewed vigor to imitate Jesus’ stand with the oppressed and downtrodden, they want to decide for themselves which party is being oppressed in the Arab-Israeli conflict.”

Posted by: Demian | Sep 30 2014 0:37 utc | 106