|
How Does The NPR Distinguish “Protesters” From “Mobs”?
The U.S. National Public Radio on Ukraine:
December 9 2013: Ukrainian Police Threaten To Drive Protesters Out Of City Buildings
Police are also threatening to enforce a court order to drive protesters out of city buildings they've been occupying.
April 7 2014: Mob In Ukraine Seizes Provincial Building, Declares Independence
On Sunday, pro-Russian mobs also stormed buildings in Luhansk and Kharkiv, two other cities in the country's east that have large numbers of Russian speakers and strong pro-Moscow sentiment.
What is the NPR's stylebook definition of "protesters" when people occupy government buildings? And how does that differ from a "mob" doing just the same?
What, did a Twitter alert from @IWUVSNOWDENQTPIE wake you from your reveries at the Fanboy Forum? I understand, I’ve gotten lost in the photo gallery, too! Did you see the one where’s he wearing that blue sweater? (tee-hee) #blush #drool
Sorrentine objectively serves the very forces which he, implausibly, suggests employ Snowden.
Wait a second…so like calling bullshit on obvious US intel stooges like Snowden is actually HELPING US intel agencies because in trying to call attention to the truth of the matter I am further confusing the populace and thus it’s probably better that we should just have them confused. Holy f*ck.
Are you feeling ok? I ask because that has got to the be one of the stupidest f*cking things I’ve ever read.
Let’s play along with all of the nonsensical narratives that American intelligence agencies craft because – murder/maiming/mayhem…all that trifling shit aside – it just addles the weak-minded and clouds their manufactured/manipulated senses of right and wrong. Won’t SOMEONE think about the f*ckheads?!!!
And a damned sight more than Mr Sorrentine has ever done.
Hey, I get the feeling – from the nature of your response – that I actually AM DOING a lot!!You yourself claim that my even HINTING that Snowden is a fraud is damaging the very fabric by which thousands of pea-brained fake progressives understand reality. Is that not something? Obviously, it’s not donning a “V for Vendetta” mask and marching around with a Snowden Fathead but it’s something as you yourself seem awful piqued.
By denouncing Snowden on the incredibly sectarian grounds that he has mot-so far as J Sorrentine is aware- denounced the state of Israel or publicly associated himself with those who regard the 9/11 attacks as a false flag operation
Look, there are two main issues which are litmus tests in America/West that no sensible person can deny exist and which no “hero” can hope to avoid and those are: 1) 9/11 and 2) Israel. If a person wants to be known as credible and wants to prove that they are willing to really step “out of line” and tell the truth vis a vis TPTB, all they have to do is profess where they stand on those two issues which are laden with propagandistic narratives miles deep. Sounds easy enough, huh? Too bad NO ONE seems to ever do just that so I do think my request is not very outlandish. Edward has repeateldly told us that he won’t harm the US government and has NO DESIRE to, so, why do I get the feeling that he’s NOT going to take Israel to task OR tell us that the 9/11 fairy tale is just that?
Next up, no doubt, is Seymour Hersh
I hate to break it to you but others here at MOA f*cking destroyed Hersh three threads ago and I didn’t play much of a role although I enjoyed it, y’know, as he just happened to write the CIA and other war criminals completely out of the gas-attack story. If you don’t think that it will confuse you, you might want to check out what some other MOA posters wrote there. Good stuff.
Posted by: JSorrentine | Apr 8 2014 22:27 utc | 74
|
