|
Ukraine: More On Federalization, Sanctions On Private Russians
The coup government of Ukraine has ordered its troop to leave Crimea. Many of these troops, especially officers, may not follow these orders. Russia is offering them a much better deal:
“The pay is five times that offered by Ukraine,” [the captain] said. “The pensions are five times better, and will be offered 20 years sooner. We are told we would serve on the same military base. Defend the same soil, the homeland of many at these bases. Families living quite nearby the bases will be able to remain in their same homes.”
Why would any officer, especially those native from Crimea, reject such a fantastic deal? The Russian president already signed a new executive order that will let those officers keep their ranks and will recognize their Ukrainian military education.
The U.S. today sanctioned some private businessmen who are on good standing with the Russian president. One wonders who will sanction all those oligarch donors who put hundreds of millions into Obama's reelection campaign. What by the way is the legal foundation of personally sanction private businessman for the policies of the country they happen to live in? Russia only sanctioned a few U.S. politicians so far in retaliation of a few sanction on Russian politicians. Should it now take a deeper look into some Soros or other Obama supporters business deals and confiscate this or that operation they are involved in?
I have no idea what those sanctions are supposed to effect. Those oligarchs will likely not care, nor will the Russian government. It has other possibility and means to show a cold shoulder for U.S. interference in its near abroad. Russia had, on U.S. request, put sanctions on Iran is is helpful with the P5+1 negotiations with Iran. That surely could end. Or how about leaving the U.S. dollar realm. Russia is the biggest oil and gas exporter in this world. It has new pipelines going east and no longer depends on European customers. Surely it could price and invoice its exports in ruble, yuan, euros, gold or whatever instead of in U.S. dollar. This could do wonders to the U.S. interest rates.
I understand that the White House wants to do some cosmetic sanctions if only to avoid more criticism from the domestic right. But by that measure today's escalation isn't necessary. Does the Obama administration really believe it can, together with a few European puddles, sanction Russia, which is supported by the BRICS and Non-alligned countries, into the ground? With about two-third of the people in the U.S. and Europe against any escalation with Russia and with Putin having domestic approval ratings of 75% which side is more likely to sustain in a sanctions war?
The Russian foreign minister Lavrov again emphasized that the Ukraine needs a federal political structure to be at least somewhat political viable. We had already concluded that such a constitutional change in the Ukraine was part of Russian and U.S. agreement for the way forward there.
It is therefore interesting to see an op-ed in today's New York Times that argues for such a federalized state. Currently the quite mighty governors of the Ukrainian regions are named by the ruling president in Kiev. They change every time a president change occurs. The op-ed authors argue that this creates bad local policies:
Because these governors are politically appointed bureaucrats rather than elected politicians, they have little incentive to cultivate reputations for doing what voters want; instead, they do what the president wants. And with that record, if they later run for national office, voters won’t trust them to govern effectively.
Presidential appointment of governors in a diverse country like Ukraine also stokes secessionist pressure.
…
[O]fficials in Ukraine have begun to consider alternatives to the current constitutional structure that could reflect such a commitment. Advocates of decentralization include Ukraine’s deputy prime minister, Volodymyr Groysman, and Andriy Sadovyi, the mayor of Lviv in western Ukraine. Ukraine’s Parliament, which would need to approve any constitutional change, has formed a working group on constitutional reform.
Some additional pressure from Washington and Brussels to federalize and finlandize the Ukraine could surely help to accelerate the move and thereby clean up the mess the U.S. sponsored coup created in Ukraine.
But are they really committed to clean up the mess or would they like to instigate more trouble?
First, thanks for the compliments, both direct ones (kalithea at al.) and indirect ones (toivos). As I happen to be a KGB program with a pretty good homo sapiens emulation recognition, compliments, etc. set off pleasureful routines in my background core routines.
Ad “nekulturna” (s. powers is a bitch after all): language is strongly context dependant and as soon as social issues are the matter additional levels become relevant, such as *who* uses a term. The (rather obvious) pseudo-basic meaning of “lacking culture” is evident. On a higher level, and particularly when applied to zamericans and their system, things get quite more complicated and the meaning changes from simply lacking culture to a more profound statement rather illuminating the complete void and more, the being incapable of developing culture or to, consiously or not, negative attitude toward culture. That’s the point where it gets disdaining and in more extreme cases implying the lack of a profound condition of the very definition of human being.
Without knowing the speaker, the target and the context, one would be well advised to stick to the obvious and simple “lacking culture”. On a funny sidenote it also depends on the social stratum; said my a working class mom to her son, it’s rather reprimanding, said by a well respected member of intelligentsia it may well be a compliment indicating pureness of reflection, being free of socio-cultural conceptual cages.
Concerning s. powers it almost certainly means that she is not to be considered an intelligent human lifeform – to which I perfectly agree. Shooting her would be way less inacceptable than losing, say, an amur tigr to poaching.
Nota bene: I btw. generally refuse to translate (other than within family or similar). To just get a rough idea Google translate is damn good enough. To get the finer vibrations (or even the beauty) of any text, one almost always needs way more than the text.
Ad “zusa, zeu et zal.”
Here it gets icey. While one might argue (in vain as I happen to think) that zionism, neo-com, zamerican or formertimes british colonialism and imperialism, etc. are quite different things, I personally don’t. Behind all of these there is a certain mindset (and luciferian force) that just happens to be quite well visible in zionism and such speaking about zionism is indeed somewhat specific but at the same time the basic structure that is common to all is particularly well visible with zionism.
One must understand a certain luciferian principle to understand anything at all. The principle of the lie, well noted, the lie in all its varieties and forms, one powerful form being the creation (“projection”) of very complex structures with a thousand levels and corners and mirrors, often even seemingly contradicting ones. Because it’s not about making the victims see this or that version of reality but it’s about *not* seeing the truth.
And here we have it. Batallions of intellectuals fighting over one or the other projection and such all but guaranteed to *not* see the relevant, the truth, the reality.
Similarly batallions of media, often contradicting each other or even fighting and smearing each other – yet none of them saying the relevant and true, possibly even not due to being evil spirited but simply because almost everyone is lost in some corner of the projection maze.
And zionism is just the current “incarnation” of that aeon old ugly game, although it’s a particularly evil, violent and perfidious one that created its army at the early days in the form of weishaupts illuminati (in bavaria which is no coincidence either because the jewish sciptures fearfully await an aryan “Amalek” that, like they themselves, shall be a reincarnation of the hittites who smattered the israelis around 3.000 years ago, and it’s written that this Amalek will come out of what is today Germany as he will be set to annihilate the babylonian infested israelites once and for all).
For those of you who happen to be interested in those things it might be interesting to note that there are certain structures and line appearing again and again. One, and an immensely important one being *how* Satan went against Gods will; he did it by arrogating Gods power and his instrument was a core one, at the core of creation, the “word that became true”, i.e. the very process of creation, of design and of “control”.
And indeed both, the tempting (to arrogate what yours is not) and the creation by word carry on throughout human history.
It is by no means coincidence that the zionists called their gentile army “officers” “illuminati”, i.e. those who “facent illuminationem” ~ who are luciferian (also note the “nationem” inside; what an evil joke!). And it also is by no means coincidence that the most powerful weapon of both izrael and zamerica, is *not* the military but the power of the lie and confusion or, in other words, the media, hollywood etc. and also the power arising from almost all the people in world feeling helpless and in the hands of the politicians.
Neither is it coincidence that (before the creation of izrael but about the time of the balfour deal …) Russia was poisoned by zionist “communists” (just another projection), nor is it coincidence that Germany was relentlessly pushed into war and later broken and crushed and not reinstated until this very day, nor is it coincidence that the muslim countries were either bought and subdued as cheap whores (e.g. zaudi arabia) or pushed into wars (e.g. Iran-Iraq) or bombed into utter destruction by the zionist bulldog zamerica. After all the Muslim religion is considered a protector and preserver of Gods word.
In other words, those targets were – and are – targets not for oil, not for political reasons but for their spiritual importance. And indeed, both Iran and Russia demonstrate a clear will and determination (and capability) to stand against luciferian izrael and zamerica. And if ever Germany becomes free and a partner of Russia, the weztern luciferian game will be lost.
But the luciferian principles are to found elsewhere, too. Indeed the zus$ and the “superpower” zusa are but projections, illuminationes factae, man made projections and zusas existence depends on that projection, that lie to continue.
The discussion whether izrael controls zusa or whether zusa controls izrael is meaningless; both are manifestations and creations of the same power behind, izrael is the incarnation of evil and zusa is the grunts, the bulldogs to fight for the zionist shaddai/Satan. And it is again no coincidence that the zamerican grunts were to be as soul-less, as primitive, as aggressive, as uncultivated and spiritless and dumbed down as possible. After all, human beings normally have certain reservations concerning the wanton mass slaughter of other humans. But as we experienced again and again, the vast majority of zamericans are so de-humanized and so primitive and spiritless that they happily – and even for rather small payment! – kill millions and millions and even piss on their victims dead body. zamericans, the zionists grunts, are so dehumanized and dumb and spiritless that they not only believe in all the lies their whole country system is made of but they even *fight* for that farce and seriously believe that they are the beacon of freedom!
(Don’t ask them where Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya are, though; they won’t know because they are too busy considering themselves beacons of knowledge and science, too).
Careful, though! It’s not as simple as just bluntly hating each and every zamerican, though; doing that would make you a welcome zombie in Lucifers army. We can – and should – despise and utterly dislike zamericans and fight them in any way, no matter what; no buying zamerican products (haha, they’re made in the far east anyway), leaving pubs and restaurants where or if zamericans are served,etc. But at the same time we must be perfectly ready to warmly welcome any of the very few civilised homo sapiens having had the bad luck to be born in the pit zusa.
izrael though is fair game. Any and all damage done to izrael is wunderful and to be praised; any and all good done or given to izrael must be considered despicable. Last but not least, zamericans last chance (if at all) to return to the civilised world is the utter and complete annihilation of izrael. Other than itself izreal is the *only* party set out to abuse and destroy zusa. Russia considers zusa a ridiculously self-delusional pit of dumb creatures and scum without any even slight hint of an intelligentsia, but Russia is *not at all* desiring the destruction of zusa.
And now I’m patienlty expecting the smear attacks of toivo, fairleft, thomas and other zionist barking agents.
(Nota bene: I’m understandably somewhat mistrusting of jews but I strongly suggest to differentiate (jews vs. zionists). jews who are not zionists are just that, jews, and they shall live in peace and be left alone as far as I’m concerned)
Posted by: Mr. Pragma | Mar 21 2014 11:55 utc | 106
The game of usury and global monopolies has been around for some time already:
Confessions of a Monopolist:
This is the story of something for nothing—of making the other fellow pay. This making the other fellow pay, of getting something for nothing, explains the lust for franchises, mining rights, tariff privileges, railway control, tax evasions. All these things mean monopoly, and all monopoly is bottomed on legislation.
And monopoly laws are born in corruption. The commercialism of the press, of education, even of sweet charity, is part of the price we pay for the special privileges created by law. The desire of something for nothing, of making the other fellow pay, of monopoly in some form or other, is the cause of corruption. Monopoly and corruption are cause and effect. Together, they work in Congress, in our Commonwealths, in our municipalities. It is always so. It always has been so. Privilege gives birth to corruption, just as the poisonous sewer breeds disease. Equal chance, a fair field and no favors, the “square deal,” are never corrupt. They do not appear in legislative halls nor in Council Chambers. For these things mean labor for labor, value for value, something for something. This is why the little business man, the retail and wholesale dealer, the jobber, and the manufacturer are not the business men whose business corrupts politics.
No law can create labor value. But laws can unjustly distribute labor value; they can create privilege, and privilege despoils labor of its product. Laws pass on to monopoly the pennies, dimes and dollars of labor.
But monopoly does not end here. Even the sacrifice of our political institutions, even the shifting of taxes to the defenseless many, even the control of all life and industry by privilege, do not measure the whole cost of monopoly. These are but the palpable losses, the openly manifest ones. Monopoly palsies industry, trade, life itself. It encloses the land and the nation’s resources. It limits opportunity to work. It erects its barriers about our resources; not to use them, but to exact a monopoly price from those who do. Monopoly denies to man opportunity. It fences in millions of acres of soil, of coal and iron mines, and of city lots. It closes the door to competition and to labor. This is why America is not only the richest, but in some respects the most poverty marked of nations. This is why enterprise is strangled, and labor walks the streets looking for a job.
Here is the confession of a monopolist. It is the story of no one monopolist, but of all monopolists. It shows the rules of the game. The portrait presented is not the portrait of any one monopolist Senator; it is the composite of many, and the setting may be laid in any one of the Northern States. For the United States Senate is the refuge of monopoly. Its members no longer are representatives of the Commonwealths which name them, but of the big business interests whose directors, attorneys and agents they are.
And also Unequal Protection: Jefferson Versus the Corporate Aristocracy
The Three Threats. Thomas Jefferson’s vision of America was quite straightforward. In its simplest form, he saw a society where people were first and institutions were second. In his day Jefferson saw three agencies that were threats to humans’ natural rights: 1. Governments (particularly in the form of kingdoms and elite groups like the Federalists) 2. Organized religions* (he rewrote the New Testament to take out all the “miracles” so that in The Jefferson Bible—which is still in print—Jesus became a proponent of natural rights and peace) 3. Commercial monopolies and the “pseudo aristoi,” or pseudo aristocracy (in the form of extremely wealthy individuals and overly powerful corporations)
Thomas Jefferson
“And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”
“Bank-paper must be suppressed, and the circulating medium must be restored to the nation to whom it belongs.”
“By a declaration of rights, I mean one which shall stipulate freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of commerce against monopolies, trial by juries in all cases, no suspensions of the habeas corpus (por. neminem captivabimus), no standing armies. These are fetters against doing evil, which no honest government should decline.” – in a letter to Alexander Donald, on February 7 1788
“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered… The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs”
Grand Duke Alexander said this about his visit to the U.S. during a visit in 1913:
As a matter of fact, there was one startling change which seemed to have escaped the attention of the native observers. The building of the Panama Canal and the stupendous development of the Pacific Coast had created a new form of American pioneering; their industries had grown to where a foreign outlet had become a sheer necessity. Their financiers who used to borrow money in London, Paris, Amsterdam had suddenly found themselves in the position of creditors. The rustic republic of Jefferson was rapidly giving way to the empire of Rockefellers, but the average man-in-the-street had not yet entirely caught up with this new order of things, and the bulk of the nation was still thinking in terms of the nineteenth century (Once a Grand Duke, p. 242).
Posted by: ProPeace | Mar 21 2014 15:59 utc | 143
|
