Kerry, al-Zawahri United In Call For Rebel Unity

January 24, 2014

October 22 2013: Syria talks open in London, ministers call for rebel unity

US Secretary of State John Kerry is at the talks along with Hague and counterparts from Egypt, France, Germany, Italy, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates, together with opposition leaders.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the London meeting was aimed at persuading Syria’s fractious rebels to have a “united position” for the UN-backed conference in the Swiss city, pencilled in for November 23.

January 24 2014: Al Qaeda Calls for Rebel Unity in Syria

In an audio recording released Thursday, the leader of Al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahri, called on Islamist brigades in northern Syria to stop fighting one another, to focus on toppling President Bashar al-Assad and to form an Islamic court to arbitrate disputes.

What other issues unite Al-Qaeda and “western” governments?

Posted by b on January 24, 2014 at 09:22 UTC | Permalink

Comments

5 Reasons to Reject #Syria Torture Report as Untrue
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13921102001214
corrupt ‘experts’

Posted by: brian | Jan 24 2014 9:26 utc | 1

“What other issues unite Al-Qaeda and “western” governments? “
1. Vladimir Putin.
2. Xi Jinping.
3. Iran.
4. BRICS.
5. Jewish Occupied Palestine.
5. Jewish Occupied America & (Rhinestone Cowgirl-ish) Friends.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Jan 24 2014 11:14 utc | 2

So is Kerry desperate, or what?
The hilarious thing about this is that if Obama, Bandar, Bibi & BBC’s “rebels” weren’t as predictably cowardly, stupid and disorganised as Obama, Bandar, Bibi and the BBC, Syria would have been Libya-ised 12 months ago.
GAME OVER, girls!

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Jan 24 2014 11:39 utc | 3

Instead of wasting time whining and gnashing their gums in public, over a missed Schadenfreude opportunity in Syria, Kerry, Hague and Obama should be asking themselves
“Are Russia, China, and Iran learning something about cowardly regime-change plots and cheap tricks?”
and wishing the answer could be NO…

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Jan 24 2014 12:11 utc | 4

It is clear the US, Uk, Israel and much of the West do not observe the most fundamental aspects of International Law,because the US,UK and France are vetoing members of the security council, they are above the rules of International Law for all time, or until the rules of the game are changed. That being so the Russian and Chinese positioning of their warships off the coast of Syria during the recent crisis was, in effect those two countries legitimate concern to prevent a flagrant breach of International Law, the moral of the story is clear, because the West led by the US cares nothing for International Law, Russia and China must make it clear that any US attempt at regime change in Syria or Iran will be met with military confrontation. I read in a previous post how when the Sanctions are over Iran hopes that their oil, combined with Iraq’s [when it comes on the market] could reduce the world price to 20 dollars a barrel. Great, how would that affect the terrorist supporting Saudi perverts, can I suggest the Iranians target the Saudis markets, and give their oil away free or at bargain basement prices for a period, and sit back and watch those fat perverts squeal when their economy is hit, and necktie parties are being formed.

Posted by: harrylaw | Jan 24 2014 13:02 utc | 5

Any significant dip in oil prices will make the Alberta Oil Sands, fracking in America and the pipeline/rail plays now being made, very unprofitable.
No wonder that the Oil Companies’ mascot, Stephen Harper, has recently been warmongering in Palestine.

Posted by: bevin | Jan 24 2014 18:27 utc | 6

Continuing Hoarsewhispher’s list @ 2 —
6. Random and unpredictable terror attacks to allow Western governments to frighten their populaces into giving up yet more freedoms and rights,

Posted by: jawbone | Jan 26 2014 19:14 utc | 7

Back to Main