|
Changing, Or Not, The Shit Chain
Today some of my readers will be able to vote for or against a change in the shit chain. Whatever the outcome of the election may be the taste of the end product is unlikely to change.

Let's hope that this sad and rather undemocratic show will end soon and without months of stupid legal hassle.
Texas, where I live, is not a battleground state. I voted for a couple of Democrats down the ticket. The majority here is used to pulling that republican lever, and none of them is expected to change their ways. The Green Party is showing up and is well represented on the ballot. Even the ordinary Democrats who have given up on the president, without reservations, can find one or two Democrats down the ticket, in whom they find some candle of human decency flickering. I mostly voted Green this time; and it was a vote I cast with enthusiasm, for Jill Stein, the Green candidate for president. In my precinct voting place, this time, there were no electronic screens on which to vote; but instead we all marked on the traditional long paper ballots I remember from years ago, and fed the form through the familiar Scantron counting machines.
Lots of Democrats are still voting Obama, going along with the lesser evil theory.
The media hype around the polling results, and so much wild hoopla over the British bookies and bet-takers claims about an Obama landslide, seems to be setting American emotions and divisions on edge, for a profound sense of being robbed; if results don’t conform to built-up expectations. Classic voter suppression and tampering threatens the count, plus covert action to spoil ballots–and as Greg Palast suggests–electronic “glitches” running through the touchscreen appliances, have the potential to disappear something in the range of 5 million votes.
A lot of emotion is riding on what the MSM trumpets as a neck and neck contest. And there is very little public display here in Texas in terms of bumper stickers (there are very few/ almost none) and an unsettling scarcity of yard signs, with which to proclaim advocacy one way or another. I don’t know for sure what this means; but I suspect it means that emotion, anger especially, is festering–like we have seen before in our history–a seeming tranquility before a storm. Rumors that the final tally in the Electoral College might drag out well past voting day, because of the effects of Hurricane Sandy, is likely to produce volatile reactions in this political atmosphere.
The corporate takeover of politics in the US has been accomplished through the corruption of the two big political parties, right here before our eyes. And part of the degeneration of democracy has been working internally, as people swallow their anger, as they have become visibly more circumspect and mum, prior to this vote. I think Chris Hedges is right in an essay written just prior to the vote, this US election process has become a sadomasochist experience. And surely there are attendant bouts of humiliation and rage, as the cheating and the artificiality of the contests become more obvious. He compares this process to the hazing experience he witnessed as a boy, in a New England boarding school.
Hedges writes:
So it is with some morbid fascination that I watch Barack Obama, who has become the prime “dominatrix” of the liberal class, force us in this election to plead for more humiliation and abuse. Obama has carried out a far more egregious assault on our civil liberties, including signing into law Section 1021(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), than George W. Bush. Section 1021(b)(2), which I challenged in federal court, permits the U.S. military to detain American citizens, strip them of due process and hold them indefinitely in military facilities. U.S. District Judge Katherine B. Forrest struck down the law in September. The Obama administration immediately appealed the decision. […]
Obama tells us that we better lick his boots or we will face the brute down the hall, Mitt Romney. After all, we wouldn’t want the bad people to get their hands on these newly minted mechanisms of repression. We will, if we do not behave, end up with a more advanced security and surveillance state, the completion of the XL Keystone pipeline, unchecked pillage from Wall Street, environmental catastrophe and even worse health care. Yet we know on some level that once the election is over, Obama will, if he is re-elected, again betray us. This is part of the game. We dutifully assume our position. We cry out in holy terror. We promise to obey. And we are mocked as we watch promises crumble into dust.
Posted by: Copeland | Nov 6 2012 19:08 utc | 7
|