Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 17, 2012
ISAF’s Lies Impede Democracy

During the recent Taliban commando attack in seven places all over Afghanistan the western military command of ISAF lauded the Afghan security forces for being able to fight off the attack. During the attack ISAF issued a press release:

Afghan National Security Forces responded to a series of attacks today in Kabul and in a few outlying provinces.

Afghan Crisis Response Units, along with Afghan police and army forces, deployed to repel the attacks that resulted in light casualties while killing or capturing many of the suicide attackers in a matter of hours.

ISAF quick reaction forces were prepared to respond if required but were not needed.

Later the ISAF commander General Allan issued a statement:

I am enormously proud of how quickly Afghan security forces responded to today's attacks in Kabul. They were on scene immediately, well-led and well-coordinated. They integrated their efforts, helped protect their fellow citizens and largely kept the insurgents contained.

The fighting goes on this evening, and ISAF is standing by to support our Afghan partners when and if they need it. I consider it a testament to their skill and professionalism – of how far they've come – that they haven't yet asked for that support.

From those two statements one would assume that the Afghan forces were able to solve the situation on their own.

Well – ISAF obviously lied:

Western contractors heard the gun battle and saw the insurgents ascending through the brick building partially shielded by scaffolding and billowing curtains of green mesh. Some of the Westerners grabbed their weapons and started firing on the militants, according to witnesses.

Back in the city's diplomatic neighborhood, Norwegian special-operations forces military mentors working with another team of specially trained Afghan forces sought to bring the attack to a rapid end.

As night fell, according to a participant in the response, a small contingent of British Special Operations Forces moved in to help.

Around 2:30 Monday morning, a pair of UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters dipped over the Kabul mountains and zeroed in on the insurgent-held building in the diplomatic quarter, unleashing sustained machine-gun fire. For more than three hours, the Blackhawks circled back for at least six more attacks, marking the first time the U.S. military has used such firepower in Kabul since Taliban fell in 2001.

A member of the Afghan parliament from Kandahar also joined the fight (video).

We asked what ISAF was smoking when, a few days before the attack, it said that there was no sign of a Taliban spring operation.

Independent of what one might think of the whole operation in Afghanistan such stupid remarks and the constant stream of false statements from ISAF do nothing but hurt the effort it is supposed to fulfill.

ISAF's false happy talk increases distrust of all involved people towards their own government and to the U.S. as leading force in Afghanistan. It is no wonder that Australia and France, usually staunch U.S. allies, want to pull out earlier than planned.

Even more important – these constant lies are an impediment of our democracies. While we can expect that politicians misinform voters they have at least some competition that helps to uncover their lies. But when the military commanders misinforms the electorate there is no one who can easily disprove their statements. How can the sovereign, the people, freely decide about wars when its employees lie about the state of the war affairs?

One wonders if what is behind ISAF's lies is sheer incompetence or some nefarious intend.

Comments

“One wonders if what is behind ISAF’s lies is sheer incompetence or some nefarious intend.”
Just more unjustified “happy talk” ala the Tet offensive in ’68 Vietnam. Gotta keep the folks at home misled to keep the money flowing.

Posted by: ben | Apr 17 2012 13:42 utc | 1

Lying about what is going on for personal-or-group advantage has become accepted and applauded. Routine, normalized, cool…
Banks, corporations, factions of Gvmt, the US military, etc. etc. simply just charge ahead, the media will follow with laudatory sound bites.
Afghan military and police cannot fight against a faction of Afghani citizens, the so-called Taliban, who are in the main a mixture of local potentates, in control, some kind of bourgeoisie if you will, hyper conservative religious figures, lowly local peasants, freedom fighters, amongst many many others.
The co-opted, instituted, cannot fight because they are not capable, of course, but more importantly because beyond the pay that is shelled out, there is no other reason to fight.
You might as well ask atheists in the US to fight Christian Republicans, or the poor in some South American country to fight Communists, or whatever. Absurd, and throwing money at ‘counter-insurgency’ (what is the insurgency?) is just laughable.

Posted by: Noirette | Apr 17 2012 15:28 utc | 2

I have a feeling that if they were smoking or smoked some of that Afghan weed,they would say,”we’re the Fukkawi,and what are we doing here,as the allegedly wacky tobacky is actually a sanity saver,and a window onto reason,if one wants reason instead of the fantasy of remaking the world in our sordid image.

Posted by: dahoit | Apr 17 2012 16:00 utc | 3

or limiting free discussion like this:
http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/the_real_criminals_in_the_tarek_mehanna_case/singleton/%E2%80%9D%3Ehttp://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/

Posted by: somebody | Apr 17 2012 18:06 utc | 4

One wonders if what is behind ISAF’s lies is sheer incompetence or some nefarious intend.
Good question. My guess is that they’re in panic mode and there are too many (desperately puerile) ideas ‘on the table’ and everyone’s too busy making stuff up, to coordinate them.
Last night, the Oz media took a tiny step toward restoring my faith in it. They reported the incident back-to-front.
i.e. they began with mention of the NATO air support … followed by military spin doctors saying how much competence and independent self-sufficiency the Western trained locals displayed. I’m probably not the only viewer who laughed out loud at the obvious contradictions.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Apr 17 2012 18:14 utc | 5

I’m just wondering:
Were these the same attacks the Taliban denounced?
Pardon me my stupidity. They happened only in the last week or so.
I’m a TV baby. And a drunk. I can’t tell which one is which: Taliban, or Terrorists Allied with the Taliban?
The distinction seems important, though: one are the US’s (and Germany’s, and France’s, and Britain’s…) enemis, the latter, the US’s (and Germany’s, and France’s, and Britain’s…) allies..
NATO – eh.
Who the fuck cares, except for anti-people profiteers?

Posted by: china_hand2 | Apr 17 2012 18:58 utc | 6