Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 2, 2012
Taliban Reunite For More Afghan Action

While there are rumors of back channel talk between the U.S. and Pakistan to patch up the relationship after the November 26 killing of 26 Pakistani troops by U.S. forces, the situation on the ground is unlikely to ever be the same than before the incident.

The U.S. might in future again be able to route some logistic traffic through Pakistan. A ship with U.S. military load arrived in Karachi today. The costs though will be higher now and it is doubtful that the Pakistani military will ever again allowed it to use drones to kill this or that family in the tribal agencies in "signature strikes" because they "behave like terrorists".

My hunch is that that is the real story behind the reuniting of the Pakistani Taliban with the Afghan Taliban:

On the directive of their supreme leader Mulla Mohammad Omar, the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban on Sunday formed a joint five-member Shura or council with Pakistani militant organisations, making a pledge to stop their fight against their own armed forces and instead focus their attention against the US-led forces in Afghanistan.

After weeks of hectic efforts, a high-level delegation of the Afghan Taliban, sent by the Taliban supreme leader, finally succeeded in bringing together different Pakistan militant groups on a single platform and make a promise that they would stop fighting the Pakistani security forces and end suicide attacks, kidnappings for ransom and killing of innocent people in the country, particularly in the militancy-hit tribal areas.

Mulla Omar, according to Taliban sources, wanted the Pakistani Taliban groups to focus on Afghanistan, where their fight against the foreign forces was in a decisive phase. "Convey my message to the Pakistani Taliban that you have forgotten the real purpose, which is to fight the invading forces in Afghanistan and liberate it from their occupation," said a Taliban leader quoting Mulla Omar.

I believe that the Pakistani military intelligence service ISI has promised the Pakistani Taliban that the drones will not fly again and that it will stop the Pakistani military fight against the Taliban in Pakistan. That, in my view, would be the concession the Pakistani Taliban will have asked for to end the fight within their country and to re-concentrate on Afghanistan.

If this works out as planned the Afghan Taliban, reinforced with Pakistani fighters and resources, will be able to push for more territorial gain in Afghanistan in 2012 than they achieved last year.

Meanwhile the U.S. embassy in Pakistani is working on another likely fruitless project to fight "extremism" in Pakistan:

The three-person unit in the U.S. Embassy public affairs section was established in July. It plans to work with local partners, including moderate religious leaders, to project their counter-extremist messages and push back against the militants' extensive propaganda machine, said U.S. officials.

It will use TV shows, documentaries, radio programs and posters. It also intends to ramp up exchange programs for religious leaders and public outreach to conservative Muslims who previously had little contact with American officials.

"There are a lot of courageous voices speaking out against extremism here in Pakistan," said Tom Miller, head of public affairs at the U.S. Embassy. "Our job is to find out how we can amplify those narratives."

The unit is just now ramping up operations, said officials. It was funded with an initial budget of $5 million that officials hope will grow. Officials declined to provide details on specific programs they are funding or plan to fund, for fear that publicly acknowledging U.S. involvement would discredit their partners.

The money flow is unlikely to stay secret and the blowback against those "moderates" who are dumb enough to take it will be harsh. The U.S. still fails to see that "extremism" in Pakistani is to a large part a reaction to what the U.S. does in Pakistan and elsewhere and not to what it, or its payed surrogates, say.

Comments

The Express Tribune is wrong in implying that AfPak can get back to a nice normal war again. Bottom line: The US has allied with India, Pakistan’s mortal enemy, and has promoted India’s interests in Afghanistan on Pakistan’s western border. Naturally that disturbs Pakistan. This can’t end well for the U.S. For one thing, the Afghan “security forces” are worthless.

Posted by: Don Bacon | Jan 2 2012 16:39 utc | 1

The Tehrik-i-Taliban (Pakistani Taliban) has always been a collection of several groups under the shaky leadership of Hakimullah Mehsud (who appears to have disappered fearing drone strikes and leaving a power vaccum).
The timeline of these talks in which Pakistan agreed peace with the Pakistani Taliban thus allowing them to move to backup the Afghan Taliban is fairly fast moving.
– November 26th – American kills 26 Pakistani soldiers angering Pakistan and leading to a review of Pakistan-US ties.
– December 6th – 60 Shia worshippers killed in Kabul. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, the Anti-Shia faction of the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility. This shows that LeJ one of the largest of the 13 groups in the Pakistani Taliban has moved from the Pakistan battlefield to Afghanistan for the first time.
– December 10th – Deputy leader of the Pakistani Taliban, Maulvi Faqir Mohammad, claimed they are in peace talks with the Pakistani government, which will have a truce in Pakistan and allow them to focus on Afghanistan
– Jan 1st – Mullah Omar releases statement pressuring the Taliban to stop all attacks on Pakistani security forces.
Also on the new Shura council that will be moving to the Afghanistan campaign are a few well known names. Sirajuddin Haqqani (who is already been involved in Afghanistan), Hakimullah Meshud (considered one of the most brutal Pakistani Taliban commanders and behind the Times Square carbombing attempt), Maulana Waliur Rahman who runs the South Waziristan Taliban, Hafiz Gul Bahudur who runs North Waziristan, and Maulvi Nazeer.
The NATO troops will likely be facing alot of new big name Pakistani Taliban commanders in 2012 if the Pakistani Taliban move over.

Posted by: Colm O’ Toole | Jan 2 2012 17:58 utc | 2

Meanwhile:
Iran test-fires missiles in Gulf exercise {long range this time}?

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jan 2 2012 18:09 utc | 3

Expect deadly, eternal Pashtun vengeance against Americans to be as irreversible as death and taxes are to us.
“When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains
An’ the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your right an’ blow our your brains.
An’ go to your Gawd like a solider.”
– Rudyard Kipling, Barrack-room Ballads, 1892

Posted by: DakotabornKansan | Jan 2 2012 18:16 utc | 4

@Colm December 6th – 60 Shia worshippers killed in Kabul. Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, the Anti-Shia faction of the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility. This shows that LeJ one of the largest of the 13 groups in the Pakistani Taliban has moved from the Pakistan battlefield to Afghanistan for the first time.
I don’t believe e-Jhangvi did this. That claim was quite murky. Looked more like an attempt to incite interface struggle by “interested circles” be they NDS or whoever.

Posted by: b | Jan 2 2012 18:57 utc | 5

@ B
Indeed the context of the bombing was quiet murky. As covered here, it took place just outside the Defence Ministry in a supposedly secure area of Kabul and the Afghan Taliban spokeman quickly denied responsibility calling it “the work of the enemy”. I included it because it fits in with the overall pattern of the last 2-3 months, with regards to the Pakistani Taliban agreeing a not to attack in Pakistan. It was certainly an incident that bears mentioning in that context.
Amir Mir also mentioned it in December in a piece on the truce:

“The rhythm of suicide attacks has changed dramatically in Pakistan, which has not experienced any major suicide attack after September 15 when a suicide bomber killed 46 people at a funeral in the Lower Dir district of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province. On the other hand, Afghanistan has seen a sharp increase in suicide bombings in recent months.”

Source: http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=81199&Cat=2&dt=12/8/2011
So the rate of attacks in Pakistan decrease “dramatically” at the same moment as Afghanistan sees a “sharp increase” attacks including on Dec 6th and we now know that Mullah Omar is planning to transfer Pakistani Taliban commanders over to Afghanistan operations, including the LeJ, which is the second largest faction inside the Pakistani Taliban.

Posted by: Colm O’ Toole | Jan 2 2012 21:16 utc | 6

so the Us took “no” for an answer? Pakistan’s about-face over the Pakistani Taliban’s issue changes everything; does it mean the Us will acknowledge Pakistan’s role in an Afghan settlement? I can hardly believe it; this is what Bush and Obama fought against all these years; or does it mean Obama has quietly acknowledged a failure in Afghanistan after the one in Iraq? or have the Pakistani given something very valuable in exchange, for example its privileged relationship with China? so is India in the game, too? so many questions – just can’t believe the Us can take such a severe setback: it’d be great news

Posted by: claudio | Jan 3 2012 1:34 utc | 7

@ claudio
So many questions, and who might answer them? The president who was a community organizer, his VP who is a buffoon politician, his chief-diplomat secretary of state whose credentials are. . .missing, the national security advisor, a lawyer who was VP at Fannie Mae when it was screwing homeowners? The ship of state is running in stormy seas and in severe danger of uncontrolled gybing due to an incapable crew.

Posted by: Don Bacon | Jan 3 2012 3:02 utc | 8

DonBacon, yes it seems tactical constrains (the logistics of the war in Afghanistan, about which b wrote so much) suddenly overwhelmed the strategical aims; the amateurs’ hallmark
it’s as if they suddenly had to reckon with the existence of Pakistan; it reminds me of what happened when they suddenly bumped into Al Sistani in Iraq, who called for mass demonstrations in favor of elections, which completely derailed Us strategy; the Us’ reaction was delayed but very nasty – death squads started to roam Iraq with the objective to stoke civil, sectarian war; let’s hope they won’t be able to do so in Pakistan

Posted by: claudio | Jan 3 2012 7:39 utc | 9

b
and what would be the impact of the release of Taliban Fazl from gitmo?
“media “leak” by senior United States officials in Washington that the Barack Obama administration was considering the transfer to Afghan custody of a senior Taliban official, Mullah Mohammed Fazl, who has been detained at the US facility at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba for the past nine years. “
http://atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/NA04Df01.html

Posted by: Rd. | Jan 3 2012 15:51 utc | 10