Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 3, 2012
Pakistan’s Change Marks The End Of The Afghanistan War

Adding a bit to yesterday's post on the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban reuniting.

What we are watching now is a very substantial reconfiguration of the Pakistani role in the Afghanistan conflict.

Having been threatened with being "bombed back to stone age" in 2001 Pakistan helped the United States' operation in Afghanistan. This angered its own Pashtun population which radicalized and started to operate against the Pakistani government. A bloody civil war ensued between the Pashtun in the Federal Administrated Tribal Area on the border with Pakistan and the Pakistani army which cost over 30,000 people their life.

But finally the rather meager payoff the Pakistani government and military received from the U.S. did no longer compensate for the political costs. U.S. arrogance in the Raimund Davis case, in taking out Osama Bin Laden, in the drone war and in demanding ever more Pakistani action against its own people while at the same time blaming Pakistan for every ill in Afghanistan increased the antipathy. The attack on a Pakistani border post was the final straw that broke the camel's back.

Pakistan is now making peace with its own Pashtun who will united with their brethren in Afghanistan and fight the invaders there. It will do without U.S. money which is anyway more and more based on conditions Pakistan can not reasonably fulfill.

Pakistan will allow the U.S. logistic line to be reopened but will heavily tax every load that passes through. This, the overflight rights it continues to provide and its influence on the Taliban will be its leverage in the negotiations over the U.S. retreat from Afghanistan.

Confronted with a Pakistani firm stand the Obama administration had the the good sense to not allow its hardliners to widen the conflict into an all out war against Pakistan.

This is then also the end of the U.S. war on Afghanistan.

The fighting is not over though and will continue while the negotiations are ongoing. That may take several years. The Taliban will not allow for permanent U.S. troop stationing in Afghanistan which is something the U.S. military and the anti-Iran hardliners very much want. Only a continued war of attrition against U.S. troops will make it clear to them that such a position is too expensive to hold.

The Taliban may agree to join the government or to some other conditions that allows the U.S. to save its face while it leaves. What happens after that is up in the air and will largely be decided by the Afghans themselves.

Comments

This is then also the end of the U.S. war on Afghanistan.
wow, ok. i have to grok this.

Posted by: annie | Jan 3 2012 17:19 utc | 1

Some, as usual, interesting details and conjectures by M K Bhadrakumar: Enter the year of the Taliban

Posted by: b | Jan 3 2012 18:14 utc | 2

Statement of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan regarding negotiations

The stance of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan from the beginning has been to bring about the end of the invasion of Afghanistan and to let the Afghans establish an Islamic government of their own choosing which does not pose danger to anyone.

I interpret “does not pose danger to anyone” a promise to never allow some AlQaeda construct in Afghanistan. That may be all the U.S. can get.

Posted by: b | Jan 3 2012 19:01 utc | 3

Indeed it does appear that now 2012 has arrived the end game in Afghanistan has become alot clearer. The US will leave sometime in 2014 and wants a few permanent bases for its 10 year effort that will allow it to monitor China, Russia, Iran. The Taliban reject any military bases and plan their own 2 year surge in the hopes that the US will just accept a promise not to host Al Qaeda. Being a stubborn bunch and given that Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China all want no US bases in the neighbourhood I suspect the Taliban will get their way on the bases.
As for after 2014 its true no one knows what will come. The mainly Tajik Afghan National Army will rule Northern Afghanistan trained and funded by the US, while the Taliban will rule the South trained and funded by the normal Pakistani-Saudi axis or whoever has been funding them the last 10 years of war. Hopefully a peace and power sharing deal after what will by then 35 years of invasion and civil war. Or a repeat of the 1990’s where the Soviet installed puppet held on for a few years after the Soviet withdrawal and was eventually overthrown by the Taliban.
All in all with the Pakistanis playing hardball on its supply lines and the Russians playing hardball of the Northern line the US will have to cave to someone.

Posted by: Colm O’ Toole | Jan 3 2012 21:27 utc | 4

exhibit number 1,982,456 of the new Nuremberg Trial of War Crimes, taken from Was Teen Killed By CIA Drone a Militant — or Innocent Victim?

Asked for documentation of Tariq and Waheed’s deaths, Akbar did not provide pictures of the missile strike scene. Virtually none exist, since drones often target people who show up at the scene of an attack

Posted by: claudio | Jan 3 2012 23:43 utc | 5

I agree with the analysis of b and Colm O’Toole. The US will probably try to retain some JSOC bases in the North after the bulk of its troops withdraw in 2014. If the CSTO resolution regarding foreign military bases (referred to by Bhadrakumar) sticks, it would be another nail in the coffin for the US’s long term plans in this area.

Posted by: FB Ali | Jan 4 2012 3:17 utc | 6

Yes the war in Afghanistan will end, but not without more economic bloodshed at home. Which is another key to be factored in.
What about the US ability to spark a wider conflict in the region, leading up to a major world-scale catastrophe? Recently they have been putting into place a lot of support structures that can prop up such a scenario. Or maybe an insurance policy by the US to trump its forcing out from Afghanistan by Pak-Iran-Russia-China?
The danger is not abetting, we still live in a very volatile situation.

Posted by: amar | Jan 4 2012 6:05 utc | 7