The Guardian's frontpage layout today is a bit awkward.
Or is this the famous British humour?
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
January 16, 2012
British Humour?
The Guardian's frontpage layout today is a bit awkward. Or is this the famous British humour?
Comments
This reminds me of a schoolyard tale which cropped up when I was a kid. A Brit newspaper was said to have led a story about Queen Victoria opening a bridge with the headline… Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Jan 16 2012 12:14 utc | 2 Aside from the humor
There are two livecams available for watching the wreaked ship The webcam is interesting. Shouldn’t they be attempting to pump some fuel out of the ship? Posted by: mrm | Jan 16 2012 12:37 utc | 4 From London, some not-so-good news for the dollar?
Well, we already knew that. The British government exists to provide for the .00001%–the Queen and her family. Posted by: JohnH | Jan 16 2012 15:36 utc | 7 Jeezz, who the hell proof reads that papers layout? George Bush? Posted by: ben | Jan 16 2012 15:38 utc | 8 b, Posted by: remembeereringgiap | Jan 16 2012 16:01 utc | 9 mrm @ 4 — Per NPR or BBC (not sure which), the cruise company has contracted a Dutch oil extraction company to remove the oil. So far, no oil has leaked, but the ship is in a protected undersea preservation area with many reefs and other divers’ and diverse beautiful areas. Alas. Posted by: jawbone | Jan 16 2012 17:03 utc | 10 The Guardian has turned into the NYTs sister publication.Screw them,and Al Jazeera. Posted by: dahoit | Jan 16 2012 17:35 utc | 11 An interesting story thats floating around at present. Posted by: Colm O’ Toole | Jan 16 2012 17:58 utc | 12 Ammonium nitrate? For a serious military group? I thought that was only used by schoolboys blowing up trees and CIA patsies. Posted by: not important | Jan 16 2012 18:12 utc | 13 Sorry. Not schoolboys blowing up CIA patsies. Rather, (and) used by CIA patsies who knew no better. Posted by: not important | Jan 16 2012 18:14 utc | 14 @Posted by: Colm O’ Toole | Jan 16, 2012 12:58:08 PM | 12 Posted by: hans | Jan 16 2012 19:35 utc | 15 @ not important Posted by: Colm O’ Toole | Jan 16 2012 20:31 utc | 16 Ammonium nitrate bombs are very big, very messy, and very, very difficult to transport. The one that hit the Murrah building in Oklahoma had to be driven there in a moving truck. Posted by: china_hand | Jan 17 2012 4:23 utc | 17 “Shame on You!” Costa Concordia’s Guest Services Manager Speaks Out, Defends Crew and Captain Posted by: Rick Happ | Jan 17 2012 5:04 utc | 18 @Rick – thanks – for my master degree I had to do an obligatory internship in metal works. I did mine at the Meyer Werft in Germany which is some 20 miles from my hometown. It’s specialty is building cruise liners (and LPG tankers). One reason why I am interested in the Costa Concordia issue. I have helped installing such big machines (well, a bit smaller than on Emma Maersk :-). An amazingly precise placing job has to be done with those really big pieces of metal. The boondoggle of the C. Concordia for now seems due to the incompetence and mad hubris of the captain. Ships are one place where top-down authority still counts. However, the events after the ‘crash’ were a total mess – I read that the order to evacuate was given 76 minutes after it. Several descriptions describe complete confusion and breakdown of communication, non-respect for emergency rules, etc. etc. Posted by: Noirette | Jan 17 2012 20:31 utc | 20 Of COURSE it is British irony dudes. Btw the Guardian, while purporting to be leftist, has its heart in Tel Aviv. Posted by: boniface goncourt | Jan 18 2012 3:51 utc | 21 (in 2 parts, due to post failure) Posted by: Noirette | Jan 18 2012 17:11 utc | 22 2/2: Posted by: Noirette | Jan 18 2012 17:14 utc | 23 @ Noirette, Posted by: dan of steele | Jan 18 2012 19:55 utc | 24 Dan, you may be right about all that. And the news reports that damn him are one guesses, correct, too much evidence -phone calls etc. Posted by: Noirette | Jan 19 2012 20:34 utc | 25 Apparently one good move was to head immediately after the crash to a port. It’s a no-brainer but probably saved lives. People who jumped off the Costa Concordia were within about a mile or less from a safe harbour, at least that’s what a photo seems to show. Posted by: jonku | Jan 20 2012 5:28 utc | 26 Here is a good explanation (video 15 min) of the last few miles the ship sailed based on AIS data. Its really a big loss but thanks to the coast guard who were rescue all of the peoples in safe situation! Posted by: Provacyl | Jan 23 2012 7:09 utc | 28 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2083147/Firefighters-race-pump-water-listing-Queens-Royal-Yacht-begins-sink.html Posted by: david | Jan 23 2012 23:05 utc | 29 |
||