Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
October 17, 2011
U.S. Build Up At Pakistan’s Border Could Be In Vain

The U.S. has pressed the Pakistani army to attack the Pakistani tribal area of North Waziristan. The Pakistanis have made clear that they do not want to do so. Now the U.S. seems to go for it alone. But is it the right target?

The Pakistani resistance against attacking its own people and to further incite domestic terrorism in their own country has led Obama adviser Bruce Riedel to calls for A New Pakistan Policy: Containment. The U.S. believes that the Haqqani network, which it says is responsible for the recent attack on its embassy in Kabul, is residing in North Waziristan. Right wing authors have for some time called for invading it.

But are the Haqqanis really in North Waziristan?

During the war against the Soviets the tribal Pakistani area most often used for attacks towards Kabul was the Kurram agency where the border points to Kabul like a beak. It provides the shortest route to Kabul. 

For some time the Taliban were fighting with the significant local Shia population there and could not use the province as their jump-off base into Afghanistan. But recently it emerged that peace deals have been signed between those groups and the way through Kurram into Afghanistan is again open.

Bahukutumbi Raman, former head of the counterterrorism division of India's secret service RAW, believes that the Haqqani network has moved there:

My assessment is that the Haqqani network no longer operates from North Waziristan. It now operates from Pakistan’s Kurram Agency. The cadres and the training camps are in Kurram, but the leaders, who are high-value targets for U.S. drone attacks, are spread out across the country to avoid airborne attacks. The cadres carry out hit-and-withdraw raids into Afghanistan.

But the U.S. insists on doing North Waziristan and, as the Pakistanis ain't doing, it now seems to want to do it on its own:

The United States shifted hundreds of its troops to the Afghan area bordering North Waziristan on Sunday along with heavy arms and gunship helicopters and sealed the Pak-Afghan border for all types of movement.

Pakistani security officials and tribal sources in Ghulam Khan area said US forces had arrived there during the night between Saturday and Sunday and occupied nearby hilltops and established observation posts. Sources said US forces had set up a huge military base across the border and shifted gunship helicopters, heavy tanks, long-range artillery guns and other heavy weapons to the border area. The villagers in Ghulam Khan said Nato warplanes were also seen flying over the border region several times during the day.

It is not yet clear if the U.S. is a just putting up a blocking position or if this the build-up for a large raid across the border. Just putting troops there is, like violating Pakistani airspace in Baluchistan, a threat on its own. The troops will draw fire and with that long range artillery the response might well land in Pakistan.

There it could expect resistance:

Tribesmen in North Waziristan were concerned about the arrival of US forces at their doors, but vowed to render every sacrifice for the defence of their homeland in case foreign troops crossed over into Pakistan.

However, they said they did not expect US forces to cross the border to enter Pakistani territory. “It will be a blunder on their part if the Americans enter North Waziristan,” said a noted tribal chieftain, Malik Mamoor Khan, in Miramshah. Another tribal elder, Malik Nasrullah Khan, said Waziristan was the land of brave and peace-loving tribespeople and they would never allow any outside power to invade it.

Whatever may happen with the new U.S. build up, blocking all border movement, artillery duels or an invasion into North Waziristan, it may all be in vain. If B. Raman is right the Haqqanis are not there anymore and will not care.

Comments

Follow the possible pipeline routes (wherever they may be). Does that explain focus on Waziristan?

Posted by: Eureka Springs | Oct 17 2011 16:48 utc | 1

@ES – no. Tapi is from north to Herat to Kandahar via Quetta and Multan to Fazilka at the border of Pakistan and India. It is around the Hindukush not through it.

Posted by: b | Oct 17 2011 18:55 utc | 2

I have to wonder, though. Are the Haqqanis really the target of that build-up ? I know they are the current bad-boys-of-the-day, or at least that is what the PR noise coming from the US military want us to believe.

Posted by: philippe | Oct 18 2011 3:17 utc | 3

On the flip side, the Guardian carries an article mentioning US withdrawal from the Kunar province (north of Jalalabad, a bit more north of the Kurram agency): US troop withdrawal leaves Pakistan vulnerable to attack by insurgents.

Posted by: philippe | Oct 18 2011 4:36 utc | 4

@ES – no. Tapi is from north to Herat to Kandahar via Quetta and Multan to Fazilka at the border of Pakistan and India. It is around the Hindukush not through it.
Of course. You fabricate a faux conflict elsewhere in order not to impede the progress you have made at the truly strategic and valued points….progress related to one of the true rationales for the Occupation. In order to justify the Occupation, conflict is necessary, and sought out. Intelligence Services create discord behind the scenes, funding and arming splinter groups to fight the Occupying Grunts. It has the appearance of incompetence and idiocy, but when you change your perspective from your conditioned traditional view, it makes sense, and becomes more clear.

Posted by: Morocco Bama | Oct 18 2011 12:10 utc | 5

Some puzzling things are going on there. After the reports cited in the post above, a Pakistani news report said yesterday that the US troops deployed had withdrawn. Today another report datelined Kabul has the Afghans announcing a joint Op Knife Edge with NATO against the Haqqanis in the area of the deployment.

Posted by: FB Ali | Oct 18 2011 14:42 utc | 6

Just last week I finished Syed Saleem Shahzad’s book on the Af-Pak war (Inside Al Qaeda and the Taliban). Was a great read and really gives you a feel for the area involved including him meeting up and spending a few days with Sirajuddin Haqqanni outside a small madrassa his father set up.
The book spends alot of time talking about the gradual takeover of South and North Waziristan during the 2002-2004 period and then onto the takeover of the entire FATA region by 2006. If the US invaded North or South Waziristan I got the impression that it would attract every single militant in Pakistan from Kashmir in the North to Balochistan in the South to the area. He also mentioned that most of the top Taliban leadership have moved from Quetta and Peshawar down to Karachi on the other side of the country (and out of range of the drones.)
The book does make clear that one of the problems the US had was that they seemed to be a year behind in everything they did. So it wouldn’t suprise me that the US could move into Waziristan only to find that the militants had moved North to the more strategic provinces. Waziristan always seemed to be a launchpad, a place to go and regroup after the initial invasion and a place for the Taliban to spend a few years until they had rebuilt their organisation before rejoining the fight.

Posted by: Colm O’ Toole | Oct 18 2011 17:39 utc | 7

Colm,
You forget that an invasion of Waziristan would be an invasion of Pakistan. It won’t be just militants who will fight the invading force, it will be Pakistani troops as well (whatever their headquarters says!). Also, expect the supply line to ISAF in Afghanistan going through Pakistan to be cut.
It won’t be a picnic!

Posted by: FB Ali | Oct 18 2011 18:26 utc | 8

why is it its the ‘democracies’ that are busy building empires and massing military forces on other peoples borders, and paying mercenaries to die for their interest and benefit etc etc/

Posted by: brian | Oct 18 2011 20:45 utc | 9

al_Jamahiriya I’m only 25 & this is the 21st century. Why have I seen so much killing by so called civilised nations. #NATO savages @Number10gov .#Tripoli
2 days ago

Posted by: brian | Oct 18 2011 20:46 utc | 10

@FB Ali Some puzzling things are going on there.
Indeed. What I find quite mysterious is that there is nothing in the U.S. media about this offense.
There is an AP story but that only carries one sentence about this.

Afghan and NATO forces have stepped up their fight against a militant network considered the most dangerous threat facing coalition forces in Afghanistan, the nation’s defense officials said Tuesday.

And McClatchy has a bit from its own reporting but is also three days behind:

Afghan security forces and their Nato allies have launched a new push against the al Qaeda-linked Haqqani network along the troubled Pakistani border, senior defence officials said on Tuesday.
US commanders say the network is their most potent enemy in eastern Afghanistan and increasingly capable of launching high-profile attacks in Kabul. Afghan Defence minister Abdul Rahim Wardak said operation “Knife Edge” was launched two days ago, while a senior defence ministry official said it was “largely against the Haqqani network”.

A NATO spokesman confirmed only that ‘enhanced official operations’ were ongoing “to reduce the select insurgent network” in the eastern region that borders Pakistan, but offered no operational details for security reasons.

No officials would pinpoint the precise area of operations along the long and violent border, but the district chief of Gurbuzin Khost province said residents had seen a lot of troop movement.

The Pakistani press is full of this issue, including editorials etc, reactions from Kahjani and ISI, etc but the western media are asleep. They probably think “if NATO doesn’t say anything we won’t either.” -> Self-censorship

Posted by: b | Oct 19 2011 9:44 utc | 11

Only now some confirmation but no details from the U.S. side:

The U.S.-led coalition has launched a new offensive against one of Afghanistan’s most virulent militant networks and plans to ramp up operations next year along the eastern border with Pakistan before the American troop drawdown gathers steam, the top commander said Wednesday.
Marine Gen. John Allen told The Associated Press that the “high-intensity, sensitive” operation that began just a few days ago targets the Haqqani group, a Pakistan-based militant network that attacks Afghan and coalition forces. The U.S. has been urging the Pakistanis incessantly to clamp down on Haqqani fighters, who have ties to both the Taliban and al-Qaida and have been blamed for most of the high-profile attacks in the heart of the Afghan capital, Kabul.
Allen would not discuss details of the operation, saying only: “Every now and again, one of these organizations that has been able to manifest itself on this side of the border is going to have to get some special attention, and that’s what’s happening now.”

Translation of the bolt part: We are playing “Whack a Mole”

Posted by: b | Oct 19 2011 18:11 utc | 12

@ 11 (responding to 6)
I wonder just how mysterious it is that this operation isn’t receiving much media coverage, when one recalls that circa 95%+ of NATO ops in AfPak receive no coverage at all? One shouldn’t be surprised that there’s an almost complete blackout on day to day ops there. From the occasional reports we’ve been getting in Oz for several years it is pretty clear that nobody with a conscience, however vestigal, would be proud of what the Yankees and their NATO figleaf are doing to innocent people in AfPak. Yankees aren’t just criminally stupid; they’re also obscenely racist, cruel and insular.
There’s a clue to what the Yankees are really up to in the McClatchy report you cite…
US commanders say the network is their most potent enemy in eastern Afghanistan and increasingly capable of launching high-profile attacks in Kabul. Afghan Defence minister Abdul Rahim Wardak said operation “Knife Edge” was launched two days ago, while a senior defence ministry official said it was “largely against the Haqqani network”.

A NATO spokesman confirmed only that ‘enhanced official operations’ were ongoing “to reduce the select insurgent network” in the eastern region …

The bold hilights spell out both the justification and the motivation for a retributive killing-spree (probably targeting people who won’t endanger the grunts by having weapons with which to frighten them).
The reference to ‘high profile attacks’ is the clincher for me. It can be translated to “Someone made made us look as stupid as we really are in front of the whole world.”
(And someone, anyone, is gonna pay).
Hitler’s Nazis did this sort of thing all the time.
Obama’s Nazis are just the same.
That’s all this is about, imo.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Oct 22 2011 15:10 utc | 13

I forgot to hilite ‘to reduce the select insurgent network’ which is NewSpeak for ‘slaughter a bunch of ter’rist suspects’ (from a safe distance).

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Oct 22 2011 15:20 utc | 14

I hope it’s superfluous to point out that ALL the perpetrators of the Kabul ’embarrassment’ are dead. But that’s not good enough for the Yankees. They want an endless stream of new enemies – which has been their post-9/11 policy all along.
It was called Perpetual War by the Neocons/Pentagoons long before someone decided 9/11 was “do-able”.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Oct 22 2011 15:48 utc | 15

The “impunity” precedent for retributive slaughter by US troops was set in stone when Nixon effectively pardoned Lt Calley for his part in the My Lai massacre in Vietnam. Calley based his own perceived innocence on the (not entirely invalid) excuse of “just following orders.”
Nixon’s interference in due process, in the wake of a public outcry over Calley’s imprisonment for ‘following orders,’ effectively killed the judicial inquiry. One could speculate that the inquiry would eventually have resulted in the conviction of some Pentagoons responsible for the orders Calley was following – if it had been allowed to continue to its logical conclusion.

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Oct 24 2011 8:28 utc | 16

Finally some (propaganda) information about that secret operation: Afghan, NATO forces kill or capture 200 militants

Tens of thousands of Afghan and NATO troops killed or captured 200 insurgents in eastern Afghanistan during two operations targeting the violent Haqqani network blamed for the majority of attacks in Kabul, the U.S.-led coalition said Monday.
At least 20 of the insurgents had ties to the Haqqani group, which is affiliated with al-Qaida and the Taliban, said German Brig. Gen. Carsten Jacobson, a coalition spokesman in Afghanistan. The roughly 180 others were from the Taliban or other groups, though not all have been identified.
About half of the Haqqani fighters were identified as leaders and the other half were bomb makers or individuals who help militants in various ways, such as distributing weapons and supplies, running safe houses or preparing areas for attack.

Roughly 25,000 Afghan soldiers and policemen and 11,000 coalition troops were involved in the operations, said U.S. Army Lt. Col. Jimmie Cummings, a spokesman for the coalition in Kabul. More than 400 kilograms (880 pounds) of explosives, weapons, munitions and computers were seized.
He said more than 400 hours of close-air support and thousands of hours of surveillance missions were flown in support of the operations, which began Oct. 12 and ended Oct. 20. The majority of the operations were conducted in Kabul province, Wardak, Logar and Ghazni provinces south and west of the capital and Paktia, Paktika and Khost provinces along the border.

Such a big operation and the outcome is just 20 Haqqani guys and some caught?
As I said in my piece the Haqqanis seem to have left that area earlier.
And the locals are not at all happy about this operation: Afghans find little to praise in new U.S.-led offensive

NATO and Afghan forces announced Monday that two recent operations had captured or killed approximately 200 insurgents — including 20 directly tied to the Haqqani network, the Taliban-allied insurgent group blamed for some of the most devastating attacks this year in the Afghan capital, Kabul.
A separate six-day operation against the Haqqanis in Musa Khail, along the border of insurgent-plagued Khost and Paktiya provinces, resulted in the capture of 11 insurgents and six weapons caches and was “one of the greatest successes to date,” according to a coalition press release.
But residents of Musa Khail said they feared that the military gains would be fleeting and that the operations could result in the closure of the Pakistani border, the lifeline for the region.

Posted by: b | Oct 25 2011 13:00 utc | 17