Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 30, 2011
What The Taliban Don’t Want

In the New York Review of Books Ahmed Rashid sets out his take of the Eid message the Taliban leader Mullah Omar put out: What the Taliban want.

I do not know what the Taliban want. But I am pretty sure they do not want to have their dead one-legged commander Dadullah be depicted as their alive one-eyed emir Mullah Mohammed Omar. (Thanks to Alex Strick van Linschoten for identifying Dadullah.)

bigger

Aside from that photo mix up, Ahmed Rashid claims that, contrary to recent reports, negotiations with Taliban are continuing:

An AP report on August 29 that quoted some US and Afghan officials as saying the talks have stalled is completely wrong according to my well-informed sources, who insist that they are continuing despite leaks to the press, as well as threats to the security of the participants and other problems.

That is good news.

Mullah Omar is calling for an inner-Afghan compromise provided that foreign troops leave the country and overly foreign interference, from the U.S. as well as Pakistan, stops.

The Afghan government, the White House and the State Department could probably agree to such a solution if they would only stop ignoring inner-Afghan politics. But the Pentagon will still want permanent bases in Afghanistan and may therefore, probably in cooperation with some Northern Alliance war lords who stand to lose power in a compromise, sabotage further negotiations. Rashid's report of "threats to the security of the participants" points to such interferences.

Like other international issues, for example the New START agreement, the biggest hurdle to clear in the Afghan conflict may be poltics within the Washington beltway.

Comments

Mullah Omar’s Eid message in English.

Posted by: b | Aug 30 2011 16:03 utc | 1

Mullah Omar (the one eyed chap) was Bin Laden’s side kick – Omar is married to a Binny daughter, afaik, amongst other details – and was on the death list of terrorists as per the US. He was a TARGET, almost as dangerous as Binny… He rode off into the sunset on a moped, a splendid picture for any B movie…
That was way back in 2001. Ever since he has managed to play a role in Afgh. politics, and is, I have heard over the years, an unavoidable raucous TV presence, a societal force, despite the ‘death warrant.’
Of course, previously, he was a very big wheel in the Afgh. Gvmt, Big Islamist El Supremo, courted by the KSA amongst others.
And so it goes.

Posted by: Noirette | Aug 30 2011 19:44 utc | 2

Like other international issues, for example the New START agreement, the biggest hurdle to clear in the Afghan conflict may be poltics within the Washington beltway.

More than half of what takes place in Pakistan and Afghanistan is the result of power politics/turf battle inside the beltway. Looking at the history, I don’t agree that Taliban would demand ouster of the US or Pakistan or both from Afghanistan as one major condition. It could be a bargaining chip, not the primary demand. Afghanistan has a history of making deals with occupying forces. In the recent past, they made deals with the Brits that allowed British troops permanently stationed in Afghanistan. They also made deals to give up some of the Afghanistan area to get the control in some other areas. Pakistan inherited FATA by way of a deal that British cut with afghan insurgents. So the afghans are very much capable of giving up some area for peace. I think giving up North Afghanistan for US bases and for the northern alliance would be an acceptable deal for the Taliban. That is what the US want and that’s what the Taliban would agree to.

Posted by: Hoss | Aug 31 2011 0:58 utc | 3

Call to arms in Afghanistan: Hekmatyar rejects Afghan peace talks offer
That is an interesting Taliban Hekmatyar split in declared policies.

Posted by: b | Sep 1 2011 9:20 utc | 4

Wasn’t Hekmatyar one of the first on the CIA payroll back in the day? From what I can remember old Hek has always been on the CIA payroll – so who’s to say that Hekmatyar is not just doing what his CIA-paymasters want him to do, helping to scupper the peace agreement?

Posted by: Hu Bris | Sep 1 2011 12:18 utc | 5

@Hi Bris – Hekmatyar has changed sides more often than most people changed their underwear. He is quite unpredictable in his behavior. I don’t think the CIA has him as an “asset”.

Posted by: b | Sep 1 2011 17:39 utc | 6