Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
June 2, 2011
When Business Reporters Fail In Basic Math

The New York Times’ Stephanie Clifford writes on efforts to reduce plastic in packaging:

Wal-Mart Stores, which has pledged to reduce its packaging by 5 percent between 2008 and 2013, [..] has made round hydrogen peroxide bottles into square ones to cut down on plastic use.

Anyone with 8th grade geometry knowledge should immediately stumble over that claim. It is contrary to the rather trivial fact that the region with a given area and minimal circumference is the circle.

Imagine a bottle holding 1,000 cubic units (units=inch, centimeter or whatever you like). Assume that it is ten units high. 1,000 cubic units divided by 10 units height gives a bottom (and top) area of 100 square units.

For the square packaging the total area of packaging material would be bottom+top+four times the side areas, in total 6 times 10 times 10 = 600 square units.

The radius of a circular bottom with an area of 100 square unit is the square root of (area divided by Pi). For a 100 square unit area the circle radius is r = 5.64 units. The area on the side of the bottle will be the circumference of the bottem circle times its high. The circumference of a circle is 2 times Pi times r  here it is 35.44 units. The total area of the bottle side is then 10 times 35.44 units times 10 units. Adding bottom area, top area and side area gives a total surface area for the round 1,000 cubic units bottle as 554.4 square units.

As the thickness of the material for both bottles will be the same the square bottle will use 8% more plastic material than the round bottle.

Not a good way to “cut down on plastic use.”

In the retail business “revenue per square foot” is a major comparative performance parameter. If Wal Mart is indeed using square bottle instead of round ones it likely does so because the square bottles require less shelf space (and transport volume) than the round bottles. 100 square bottles with the size used above can be shelved on an area of 10,000 square units. The same shelf area will only hold a maximum of 82 round bottles of the same size.

Wal Mart is not concerned about plastic usage in packaging, it is concerned about revenue per square foot because that parameter is important to stock analysts and thereby its stock value.

For someone writing in a prime newspaper on retail business one would expect a better understanding of the basics of that business. But that would require some basic math knowledge. Something Stephanie Clifford seems to lack.

Comments

LOL b! Again, we see the “profits uber alles” theme. That “reporter” took the Wall-Mart press release and ran with it. More disinformation for the moron masses.

Posted by: ben | Jun 2 2011 14:04 utc | 1

I highly suspect It has nothing to do with the basic math knowledge of Stephanie Clifford, or any faux pas editing of the NYT’s. She may or may not process the skills, that is immaterial, this is a gage article to see how the collective test subjects will respond or mere space taking distraction.
What’s the difference?
Strategic Communication Laboratories remember them? Maybe they could be called on to help guide these type things.
You Can’t Handle the Truth
Psy-ops propaganda goes mainstream.

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Jun 2 2011 14:08 utc | 2

b, I don’t disagree that the square bottle to save plastic is erroneous in the least, and fraudulent at worst, but I’m not certain that revenue per square unit of shelf space is the reason for the square bottle. For starters, stock analysts are more concerned with profit then they are revenue, especially for a well-established company like Wal-Mart, and secondly, it’s time on the shelf that’s more important, meaning inventory turns. If a square bottle enables them to use less space for the same volume of hydrogen peroxide to accommodate an established turn rate, thus allowing for space for additional product offerings and their respective turn rates, than yes, I agree, and also the logistical costs are always a consideration when you factor in rising fuel charges.

Posted by: Morocco Bama | Jun 2 2011 15:35 utc | 3

Thanks for posting this :). I read an article using the same wal-mart statement and of course the stench of BS emminated immediatly. Of course we don’t know if they made them paper thin but the square bottle idea had to be initialy devised to save volumetric space for transport and shelf capacity as you stated.

Posted by: James | Jun 2 2011 15:57 utc | 4

perhaps they are talking about the cardboard boxes the bottles are packed in. They could potentially be smaller but not the plastic ofcourse

Posted by: Khalid | Jun 2 2011 16:48 utc | 5

Less shrink-wrap plastic over the cardboard case holding the plastic bottles? Yeah, less run with that.

Posted by: Biklett | Jun 2 2011 17:09 utc | 6

Here’s a decent documentary on Wal-Mart.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hftb_DVuelo&feature=related

Posted by: Morocco Bama | Jun 2 2011 17:40 utc | 7

B,Have you an answer to the new article in the Irish Times, The Israel Ambassador is doing a lot of persausion here and I wRUTH ZAKH
OPINION: The new flotilla to Gaza is all about delivering provocation rather than aid, just like last year’s
Many thanks

Posted by: boindub | Jun 2 2011 20:51 utc | 8

IMAGINE THE house next door to yours was occupied by neighbours who announced that one of their most cherished goals was to drive you off your property

did you show ’em the Old Testament and DNA tests showing you were the descendants of the rightful owners of the house?

Posted by: claudio | Jun 2 2011 22:00 utc | 9

“IMAGINE THE house next door to yours was occupied by neighbours who announced that one of their most cherished goals was to drive you off your property.”
If you change the last “your” to “their”, it might make more sense as to the problem.

Posted by: ben | Jun 3 2011 1:08 utc | 10

“… aboard the sixth vessel were some 40 members of the IHH, an Istanbul-based terrorist organisation with a history of providing material support to jihadi campaigns worldwide, including in Chechnya and Afghanistan. They initiated a violent attack against the Israeli soldiers undertaking legal blockade-enforcement actions, while shouting: “Go back to Auschwitz!””
This is of course a complete fabrication: every claim is a lie.
Someone else can read the rest of the rubbish- this bit simply caught my eye.
It is a pity that anyone would pay attention to such crude fabrication. It does serve however to draw attention to the cowardly refusal of the provisional government of Egypt to bring a quick end to this slow starvation of Gaza’a most vulnerable people by opening the Rafah crossing completely and calling Obama’s bluff.

Posted by: bevin | Jun 3 2011 1:19 utc | 11

I vote the pile of steaming dog turds jam-packed with typically filthy zionist lies be deleted from this thread. We come here to talk in a space free of the stink of imperialist mendacity.

Posted by: OIOIOIOIOI | Jun 3 2011 5:11 utc | 12

@9, that is an excellent idea. It would answer, once and for all, who really are the blood semites of the Bible, and therefore, who are the true descendants of “God’s Chosen People,” whether they currently believe, or not. Come on, Bibi, cough up your DNA for testing, or else put this lie to rest. I’m convinced that the Zionist Christians in the U.S. still wouldn’t change their belief considering this disconfirming information. Such is the power of Cognitive Dissonance.

Posted by: Morocco Bama | Jun 3 2011 12:03 utc | 13

I would also point out that the round bottle would have higher tolerances for structural integrity and thus the square bottle would need to have thicker walls to meet the structural specs.

Posted by: Joseph Stephen | Jun 3 2011 13:01 utc | 14

@MB – once I read that the even the places where the romans met the fiercest resistance from the jews, like Jenin, were the same where the israelis met the fiercest resistance from the palestinians

Posted by: claudio | Jun 3 2011 14:23 utc | 15