|
Open Thread – April 19
John Pilger: Barack Obama worked for a company which is a known CIA front: video – seems to be true – there is longer version of the Pilger 2009 talk the first video is cut from: Obama and Empire
Fits to a news(!) piece McClatchy had today: Obama ran against Bush, but now governs like him
AP writer vs. State Department spokesperson on human rights abuse on Bradley Manning: video
More Black Men Now in Prison System Than Were Enslaved
Please add your views and news.
I haven’t had much to say recently. Partially because being too busy with the domestic fallout from earthquakes and a government in the thrall of banksters, there simply isn’t time to write of the issues outside of the region I inhabit. But also because there is really nothing to say, the global horror continues, & I find no pleasure in being correct in predictions of where the Arab ‘revolution’ and the Libyan intervention would end.
I for one would be much happier to be wrong about those things, to be wrong about my current instinct which tells me the UN call for a temporary cease fire a week after rejecting the Libyan government offer of a permanent cease fire is nothing more than a tactic to stall the Libyan government advance until sufficient fukUS machine guns and ‘advisers’ have been shipped in to Misrata.
I am writing now cause I have just got back from a a drive into town, a trip that takes some time so I turn on the radio to listen & hasten the journey. I only ever catch fragments, cause my journey isn’t sufficient time to hear the beginning of some spiel or its conclusion. Tuning a commercial free station that favours western classical music and serious yarns about serious business, even if I violently disagree with the tenor of the music or the conversation, often the case.
Still either of those get me to to think without too much distraction from driving. The kids hate it so avoid coming if I’m gonna “have the radio on”.
This morning’s radio show featured some english literary critic who was yammering on about his new book that discussed ‘relationships’. Primarily relationships between early 20th century poets. Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen featured quite heavily along with a discussion of how they got past Rupert Brooke’s glorification of war and began writing about the horrific reality of WW1,
The un-named (while I was tuned in)literary critic referred to Brooke’s ‘different’ style. It is important to remember that afaik Brooke never actually saw action, he died en route to Gallipoli the killing ground for so many Turks, kiwis, Aussies, Indians, and Canadians as well Brooke’s mob – the warmongering english.
Despite some inquiry by the radio host, the ‘literary critic’ wasn’t at all vehement about the role which Owen, Sassoon and Graves, amongst others, played in providing a voice for the 20th century anti-war & pacifist movements.
Then this critic – book peddler or whatever his claim to fame is, went on to say that Owen & Sassoon had been enjoying a minor renaissance – that amerikan troops were being read the WW1 poems before embarkation for Afghanistan.
Apparently to better prepare them for the ‘realities of war’.
I just about swerved off the road in horror and I reckon the interviewer sounded a bit gob-smacked too cause she said something along the lines of ‘how sanitised was the poetry?’, to which the low life pommie scum replied ‘Not at all. The amerikan military decided the best was to inure their cannon-fodder to the realities of war is to present them with that reality and ‘discuss’ it before they actually confront anything horrific.
As soon as I got home I did a google on Sassoon, Owen Graves us troops Afghanistan’ or some such and found a number of hits, including this one from the Independent, which may be written by whoever it was on the radio this morning.
It appears to be true as in:
Whatever faint whiff of PR may hang about Cameron’s choice, his admiration for Owen’s poetry is probably genuine. He is reflecting a preference shared by many, including soldiers, both in the UK and the US. American troops training for Afghanistan studied not only maps and military procedures, but also poems by Owen, Siegfried Sassoon and Rupert Brooke. “Dulce et Decorum Est” in particular got through to one young sergeant from Portland, Oregon: “Just by what he said you actually can feel it, or you can get a mental picture of the death or the awful sights.”
“Jolly good, what. See we can spin up anything and resell it to amerika to prove that england is the epitome of language and culture, next an article on how John Lennon inspired the marines to slice more ears off gooks around Da Nang.”
Imagine no ears
I wonder if you can
No need for pinko lies
In and around Da Nang
Imagine all the people
giving us all the world
It is this bit here that I find most offensive:
It is true that the 1920s and 30s saw an outpouring of brilliant war memoirs – notably Sassoon’s Memoirs of an Infantry Officer, Graves’s Goodbye to All That and Brittain’s Testament of Youth. But whether these changed broader perceptions of the war is questionable. Instead, that change came with the debunking 1960s. . . .
. . . If the 1960s politicised the Great War, the 1980s and 90s helped to humanise it.
By delaying the anti-war impact of these poets work until the 1960’s, an era which is regarded with some contempt by many younger westerners, the author is not only saying that these poets weren’t the pacifists, which some may have been led to believe, he is also laying the blame for that misconception, by putting the boot into a corpse already on the canvas. I have no interest in resurrecting some boomer Vs gen x, y & z cause I remember the disgust with which many of us considered our immediate predecessors, the WW2 generation, and how we came to regret that attitude when it became almost too late, as they were dying off.
All the evidence eg Graves and Sassoon’s antiwar opinions expressed during WW1 points to men vehemently opposed to war in all its forms.
Graves did intervene and persuade Sassoon to ease up a bit on this, but that wasn’t because he disapproved of the cause, it was because he (Graves) was concerned about the effect of military punishment on Sassoon who was already sick from exposure to gas and the bad diet inadequate facilities of the trenches in WW1.
Despite what this Ricketts bloke reckons, I reckon Siegfried Sassoon would be spinning in his grave if he knew:
“If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs
the tale of a soldier who was a bit slow in getting on his gas mask had been turned into a heroic epic designed to get more young blokes out killing.
The civilian casualties in WW1 must have been large but the nature of trench warfare would have meant that fighting casualties would be much higher, so these poets relative silence on the issues of civilian casualties shouldn’t be interpreted as tolerance of the huge rate of civilian death in Afghanistan.
These creeps will pervert anything in the scramble to justify their horrors.
Posted by: Debs is dead | Apr 19 2011 23:53 utc | 13
|