Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
April 10, 2011
Hail The Icelanders

There was once a bank, Icesave, which was formally established in Iceland but did most of its business through websites in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. It promised savers to pay higher interests than other banks.

Then came the crash and bank broke down. The savers money was gone. The governments of Britain and the Netherlands were fast to promise their national Iceland saver a full return of their money. They expected the government of Iceland to pay that money back to them even before they bother to ask it. The UK used anti-terrorism rules to size the bank's assets.

The government of Iceland negotiated a deal with the other governments, essentially promising that Iceland's taxpayers would pay whatever they asked for, and pressed the parliament to agree to it. It did but the president of Iceland vetoed the law. It was put to a referendum and the people of Iceland rejected it.

A second round of negotiation happened but today the results were again voted down by the people:

Many Icelanders feel they should not have to pay for the mistakes of their banking elite, who made deals around the world during a decade of boom before the credit crunch struck.

Indeed. Many people elsewhere, likely high majorities, feel just the same. I hail the Icelanders for setting this example of sound thinking and peoples will. Let's hope that other people will learn from this.

Comments

Great find, b. Of the 3K+ feeds in my Greader, I’ve yet to see this story.

Posted by: Jeremiah | Apr 10 2011 17:31 utc | 1

Thanks for this one. If only the USA could get a little of that Iceland spirit! (is it cold there?)

Posted by: Joseph | Apr 10 2011 19:17 utc | 2

Michael Hudson on Iceland and the PIIGS: Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain.

It thus would be legally as well as morally wrong for Iceland’s citizens to spend the rest of their lives paying off debts owed for money that should rather be an issue between Britain’s Serious Fraud Office and the British bank insurance agencies. Overarching the vote is how high a price Iceland is willing to pay to join the EU.

Posted by: catlady | Apr 10 2011 20:08 utc | 3

Meanwhile, back here in the good ol’ corporatocracy of the USA, Obama’s bank regulators are preparing to slap the banksters, Obama’s favorite “savvy businessmen,” on their well-dressed wrists (very, very gently) by agreeing to remind them they shouldn’t have ignored all those pesky laws about real estate paperwork and deed registration, etc., etc.
The NYTimes editorializes about it, tsktsks, and it will…just go into effect. Obama needs banksters’ donations for his reelection and he needs them for his post-presidency wealth augmentation plan.
Not much coverage in the MCM (Mainstream Corporate Media), but FDL’s David Dayen notes the agreement undercuts state attorneys general in their attempts to go after banksters’ mortgage frauds. And to get all those unpaid fees for deed registration paid to the counties….
Wall Streeters’ early backing of Obama is paying off magnificently for them.

Posted by: jawbone | Apr 10 2011 21:10 utc | 4

what’s it got to do w/anti terrorism?

Posted by: annie | Apr 11 2011 1:29 utc | 5

annie@ 5: Don’t know about the UK, but in the US, if you cause economic harm, you can be labeled a terrorist. Overly simplistic explanation, but true in the US.

Posted by: ben | Apr 11 2011 1:44 utc | 6

“…what’s it got to do w/anti terrorism?”
Nothing Annie. But then very little has. The Labour Prime Minister Brown used the law, in much the same way that the Patriot Act enables the US government to do just about anything it chooses.
The good news is that Iceland’s voters, who were, according to eve of poll opinion polling, likely to vote in favour of the law (the product of a Social Democrat-Green coalition, incidentally) did the left thing. The bad news is that the bankers never give up: there will be court action, lengthy and opaque negotiations and then there will be another referendum.
And another, until the Icelanders get it right and agree to debt peonage, like the Irish, the Greeks, the Latvians, the Portuguese and every one else because the truth is that these debts are too big to be paid. Which is something that the lenders should have realised when they made the loans. And, in the end they won’t be paid-the creditors realise this but they also realise that the longer they pretend that There Is No Alternative, the less hair they will lose in the barber’s chair.

Posted by: bevin | Apr 11 2011 1:51 utc | 7

Recommended for more info – Red Ice Radio – Birgitta Jonsdottir – Pt 1 – Financial War Against Iceland:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUNpIbhaY1Y&feature=player_embedded#at=298
Also, Max Keiser has covered this story quite extensively:
http://maxkeiser.com/?s=Iceland

Posted by: Rick | Apr 11 2011 1:52 utc | 8

bevin @ 7: Thanks for the adult version.

Posted by: ben | Apr 11 2011 3:26 utc | 9

A german, irishman, portuguese man and a greek man walk into a bar.
The german pays…

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Apr 11 2011 9:10 utc | 10

As the german should for exploiting the others for decades. Breaking down euro issues into nationalist ones now when times are hard is a particularly hypocritical stance.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Apr 11 2011 16:18 utc | 11

Unless the people of Portugal are looking forward to becoming debt slaves to the banks for many decades to come, as has happened to the people of Ireland, it would be wise of them to do what the people of Iceland did, which is to tell the banks to get themselves out of debt without any help from the Portuguese government and the Portuguese taxpayers. If the people of Portugal want to maintain a decent standard of living for themselves by continuing to have decent schools and hospitals and other such things that are too priceless to put a price tag on, they’ll choose to save their public assets over saving the zombie banks.

Posted by: Cynthia | Apr 12 2011 0:55 utc | 12

It should be noted that Icesave is only a portion of the bank debt assumed by Iceland, and a portion that does not hurt local banksters.
Still, a step in the right direction.
And yes, the nation vs nation narrative leads wrong. The industries and banks in Germany has benefitted largely from the euro, in no little part by scaring ordinary people from demanding wage increases. That was achieved through dismantling the social security net, most clearly in the different Hartz I-IV. The welfare state is under attack, by different methods in different countries.

Posted by: a swedish kind of death | Apr 12 2011 9:06 utc | 13

The mention of Michael Hudson reminded me of this, from Nov. 2010 – he discusses the bank bail-outs etc. and more.
excerpt:
The danger the United States faces today is that the government debt crisis scheduled to hit Congress next spring (when Republicans are threatening to vote against raising the federal debt limit as the government deficit soars) will provide an opportunity for the wealthy to give a coup de grace on what is left of progressive taxation in this country. A flat tax on wage income and consumer sales would “free” the rentiers from taxes on their property – just the opposite of Keynes’s hoped-for “euthanasia of the rentier.”
http://michael-hudson.com/2010/11/schemes-of-the-rich-and-greedy/

Posted by: Noirette | Apr 12 2011 14:39 utc | 14

Noirette,
What is life to the banking sector is death to all other sectors of the economy.
Oh Aqualung, you snatch your rattling last breaths
with deep-sea-diver sounds, and the flowers bloom like
madness in the spring:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqZmtq5LhFo

Posted by: Cynthia | Apr 12 2011 16:20 utc | 15

Awesome musical/cultural connection, Cynthia! I still love Ian and his mad antics!

Posted by: Maxcrat | Apr 12 2011 22:44 utc | 16

More from Michael Hudson — interview from December, 2010.

Posted by: jawbone | Apr 13 2011 2:56 utc | 17