Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
January 12, 2011
Lebanon Crisis

A new crisis has grown up in Lebanon and is about to explode. To understand what is going on we will have to recap some recent history.

In 2005 the former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri, a Saudi-Lebanese building magnate and politician who plundered the Lebanese while rebuilding Beirut at their cost and to his benefit, was assassinated with a car bomb explosion. Following that the Bush administration managed to install a UN tribunal to investigate the assassination.

The German prosecutor Detlev Mehlis, who earlier had been handy in manipulating other issues the empire was interested in, was installed as commissioner to investigate the case. His organization leaked a lot of rumors and false details. Eventually Mehlis accused Syria on the basis of now retracted false and bought witnesses and imprisoned for several years four Syria-friendly Lebanese officers. For lack of any evidence against them and Syria Mehlis successor Bramerz later set the officers free.

By that time there was less interest in Washington and Tel Aviv to accuse Syria and more interest to somehow get Hizbullah, the Shia resistance and political movement which had kicked the Israeli occupation out of South Lebanon and won a short war against it in 2006. In May 2009 a, likely Israeli, source leaked a rumor to the German news weekly Der Spiegel that the tribunal will implicate high ranking Hizbullah members in the Hariri assassination.

Hizbullah's chief Nasrallah is keen to not have is movement accused. After rumors of a tribunal indictment grew, he convened a big rally and provided some evidence, including captured Israeli drone videos, that pointed to an Israeli involvement in the Hariri killing.

Lebanon is ruled by a unity government which includes all major religious sects within two blocks. Hariri's son Saad, a Sunni, is the prime minister and with some Christian and other groups makes up the Saudi and U.S. supported "March 14" alliance. The Shia Hezbollah and the Christian group of former general Aoun are the Syrian supported "March 8" block which also holds cabinet seats.

A tribunal indictment of Hizbullah could lead to a new civil war in Lebanon. While the U.S. and Israel would probably favor such a war, the Lebanese, the Syrians and the Saudis, who have invested heavily in Lebanon, would rather prefer peace. Accordingly there have been talks between Syria and the Saudis to avoid a conflict.

The mechanism to do so would be a Lebanese cabinet decision to stop to pay for the tribunal and to preemptively reject its findings.

Yesterday the March 8 block announced that it would leave the cabinet, and thereby illegitimize the Lebanese government, if Hariri junior does not agree to that solution. But it seems that USisrael vetoed this outcome and Washington pressed Hariri junior, who was in Washington today, not to agree to any move against the tribunal.

After Hariri's meeting with Obama 11 ministers in the Lebanese cabinet have resigned and the government is no longer able to make any decision.

So how will this end?

The well informed Friday Lunch Club guesses:

After some tractions, we are headed to a government of 'One Color' headed by a Sunni 'hardliner' from the shelved ranks of the Opposition! We do not foresee any trouble on the ground, because all indications do point to a state of 'panic within the ranks of March 14'. However, we are told by Senior Opposition figure &(regional representatives) that should they 'squirm', the riposte is ready.

I'd like that outcome, but there are some possible violent spoilers the U.S. and/or Israel could use to prevent it.

Comments

The plot is really intriguing. Hezbollah released some videos taken by Israeli reconnaissance, showing that they were monitoring Hariri’s motorcade when he was assassinated. What was that all about?
A Russian expert claims that the wounds caused by the bomb were extremely unusual, as were the wounds in the Gaza operation, Cast Lead. I’m not sure they were the same anomalies, but the Russian study claims that they were consistent with those that would have been caused by brand new German nuclear-nanotechnology, unavailable to Hezbollah or Syria.
Also there is the issue of the false witnesses, a group of people who gave the Tribunal false testimony resulting in the jailing of several military officials for several years. It seems generally conceded that the false witness story is true, but the Tribunal seems intent on ignoring it, as does Hariri’s cabinet. Most important, it begs the question of how much of the evidence comes from such false witnesses.
The combination of these stories is destroying the legitimacy of the tribunal, making it pretty clear that it is simply out to “get” Hezbollah.
I was in Lebanon when that genuine Ugly American, John Kerry, announced that the Tribunal was going to deliver its verdict and there wasn’t a damn thing Lebanon could do about it. Naturally, he was studiously oblivious to any issues involving the credibility of the verdict.

Posted by: JohnH | Jan 13 2011 2:08 utc | 1

I find it curious that Israel is not mentioned in this NYT article.
Of course, Debka is playing this up big time. I doubt any intimidation will work.
With Hizbullah’s support of the Lebanese population, not to mention the governments of Syria and Iran, my guess is that Hariri will be forced to give in and/or be forced out without civil war (and Netanyahu will have that much more to complain about). Of course, I have been wrong before.

Posted by: Rick Happ | Jan 13 2011 3:30 utc | 2

So what were the “some possible violent spoilers the U.S. and/or Israel could use to prevent it” you were thinking about, b?

Posted by: alexno | Jan 13 2011 8:46 utc | 3

@alexno – more of this Israelis arrest Lebanese near border area (Roundup) or some false flag assassination in Beirut. Imagine what might happen if someone kills Michel Suleiman and leaves a trail to this or that group.

Posted by: b | Jan 13 2011 10:12 utc | 4

I think Sa’ad Hariri is stuck between a rock and a hard place, and he’s not up to it. The US(Israel)is pressing him to continue with the tribunal; Hizbullah says no. But he doesn’t have the personality of his father.
I always thought the accusations against Hizbullah were somewhat bizarre; the way they just suddenly appeared out of nowhere. Very convenient.
I don’t see though how this crisis is going to turn into civil war, even with Israeli provocations. Nobody wants a civil war, though they’re all afraid of it. Hizbullah should be able to face down the opposition, even the US(Israel), like they did the last time they came out on the streets. Hizbullah does not want to be in power.
So Friday Lunch Club is right.
All the Christians, and the Sunnis – the ones most in contact with the US and other powers like Saudi Arabia – complain a lot. And the US listens to them, like they listened to the opposition in Iran, not understanding that the Iranian opposition is a minority. The French of course dine with their friends the Christians, mainly Maronites. The Saudis with the Sunnis. They listen to them, forgetting they no longer have the power they used to have. The power is with Hizbullah – the despised Shi’a – but Hizbullah don’t want overt control.

Posted by: alexno | Jan 13 2011 11:23 utc | 5

I don’t see though how this crisis is going to turn into civil war, even with Israeli provocations.

Posted by: Chris Taus | Jan 14 2011 7:35 utc | 6

Hariri returns to Beirut after government collapse

Oussama Saad, a Sunni politician who is a Hezbollah ally and potential candidate, called for a new prime minister who would “defend the resistance.”
“We cannot accept Hariri’s return to the post of prime minister,” he said Friday. “We call for a new prime minister who does not draw strength from the outside against the people of his country, and one who doesn’t conspire against the resistance.”

Posted by: Rick Happ | Jan 15 2011 3:55 utc | 7

The real issue for Lebanon here isn’t some huge existential crisis that will cause the state to dissolve into warring factions. The lessons of the 1980’s are still fresh enough in everyone’s minds to prevent some idiot megalomaniac from cranking up members of one sectarian faction, and convincing them to go into war with the others, for at least another 25 years or so.
No the real issue is the fact that this ‘white anting’ of an artificial state has been going on for decades, and is designed to ensure that it never does achieve any sort of sovereign national identity.
Of course one of the long term effects of this continual hacking away at the foundations of the Lebanese state by amerika & Israel is that, in 25 years when people are still angry, the issue of the sectarian gerrymander remains unresolved, and many will not have experienced the hideous reality of a civil war, foreign agents will be able to foment armed conflict between Lebanese.
I have no doubt that the Hariri killing was committed at the behest of Israel and amerika but it is unlikely that that could ever be proven since the trail has become so muddied with all the false witnesses and fit-ups, so one is left with the only evidence that is possible in an ME full of corrupt self-serving judeo-xtian assholes. Cui Bene? Both Israel and amerika have gained massively from the assassination. We discussed it in here endlessly at the time & afterwards, that Hariri Snr, who was at heart a pragmatist, who had been round the block a few times, had been willing to reach a reasonable understanding with Syria and Hezbollah.
Neither of them was pissed with him. The Saudis may have felt like the meat in the sandwich between Syria and amerika; but a stable Levant (which is what Hariri, Syria & Hezbollah were promising) was also in the interests of Saudi Arabia who have considerable investment in Lebanon and had installed Hariri for exactly that reason.
That leaves amerika and israel, both of whom have been doing everything they can to keep Lebanon a barely functioning container filled with warring factions too busy arguing with each other to present a united front against the ethnic cleansing of the Jordan Valley.
For is the diversity of Lebanon that makes it so difficult to suborn in the same way Egypt was suborned on the judeo-xtian beach-head’s southern flank.
Any attempt to install a dictator for life in Lebanon would certainly fail because of that cultural diversity, so the judeo-xtian invaders have decided that it is necessary to keep Lebanon divided against itself, because if Lebanon were left alone to evolve into a sovereign state that was a genuine & enduring expression of Lebanese people’s political beliefs, it would be implacably opposed to the invaders squatting just South of them, who murder members of the extended families of Lebanese every day.
There is no need to list the litany of aggressive actions which the invaders and their support base have inflicted upon the people of Lebanon; most of us are familiar with the most egregious.
It must be especially galling to the judeo-xtian invading force that the more they seek to divide Lebanese people, the more united they become.
This is the real danger of representative governments, even Gerry-mandered ones, which is why Dubya’s determination to establish representative govts in those areas of the ME he invaded, were meet with derision and outright hostility by old school imperialists like James Baker.
The true judeo-xtian ME imperialists mush prefers a despot such as Zine al-Abedine Ben Ali of Tunisia. Over the next few weeks we are bound to hear a lot of horror stories about Ben Ali, and the torture chambers, imprisonment without trial and all the other nasty things he did to his people. People will say to themselves “see those nasty Arabs/Africans/whatever can’t be trusted to govern ‘nicely’ no one ever asking why it is nothing had been said about this den of iniquity in the decades of Ben Ali’s rule.
They would do better to ask themselves why it is that the great protector of the African people Barack Oblamblam didn’t have a word to say about Ben Ali and his nastiness until he had gotten him bundled onto a plane outta Tunisia, after first ensuring a smooth succession to a new improved despot.
It took until Friday by which time Ben Ali would have ‘touched down’ in his undisclosed new location before Oblamblam mumbled that :
he applauded the courage and dignity of protesting Tunisians, and urged all parties to keep calm and avoid violence .
Yeah, you can almost hear Pete Townsend’s power chords as he windmills into the intro of “Won’t get fooled again” . (Sorry bout that – the image of that song being played by aged fat farts at an amerikan “concert for 911” or whatever they called it just appeals to my sense of irony. Perhaps we could have a contest b. Count The Ironies”)
Where was I oh yeah “Old School Tunisia” is exactly the sort of state favoured by the empire, hopefully the Tunisians realise this and don’t fall for the scam. Their only chance is to force some sort of division among the security forces, between those loyal to Ben- Ali and the pragmatists who don’t much care who it is they are raping and torturing for.
It has happened but without having soldiers who feel some support for the people in the military it is unlikely to happen. I don’t know enough about the political forces in Tunisia. France still trains and arms the Tunisian army and prolly the torturers too, although amerika and israel have prolly gotten involved over the last decade of ‘gwot’.
When are the French people gonna wake up to the horror that their country’s continued imperialism inflicts on Africa & the Pacific?
It shits me that france continually gets off scot free when the role of whitefellas in creating mayhem on the planet is examined.
The french govt’s only real concern over the Tunisian mess they created, appears to be that a/the insurrection doesn’t spread to Algeria.
A bit unlikely, the poor old Algerians learnt a lesson a la Lebanon first hand when they last went for a representative govt back in 1991 – hundreds of thousands of villagers ethnically cleansed by the government they didn’t elect- France and amerika backed the old boss into refusing to accept the result. Ooh fancy that! Shades of Robert Mugabe what?
After 911 the amerikans had all of those who won a seat back in 1991 declared to be a terrorist, of those alive, many are still incarcerated now.
b/ That there isn’t a “negative impact immigration wise”. Now that is complicated but at its heart what it means, is that france wants to be able to continue to cream North Africa’s best and brightest; (the economists, doctors, and IT professionals Africa desperately needs) to accept them into france to plug gaps in its own labour market. That must occur without letting in any ‘unskilled’ Tunisians or Algerians. There is no work for the unskilled in france now; apart from which bourgeois North Africans only rarely lift their heads from the time-constrained working and consuming to think about ‘making things better’. In other words ideal citizens for the ‘new europe’.
So while it is alarmist to consider that Lebanon’s resistance to doing as the judeo-xtian invaders instruct will start a civil war tomorrow, in light of what these racist and greedy assholes are up to throughout the ME, it is not unreasonable to consider the invader’s role as being 100% destructive.
They intend to keep on chipping away at the fabric of the Lebanese state not to create any huge conflagration, but to ensure Lebanon remains too busy patching itself up to ever improve Lebanon’s viability.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jan 15 2011 23:05 utc | 8

here’s an interesting link..Saad al-Hariri Caught On Tape with “False Witness” Muhammad Zuhair al-Siddiq

Posted by: annie | Jan 16 2011 1:32 utc | 9

i also recommend Hariri Tribunal Reports Tell a Different Story than CBC Account from the same source. it’s from november but it’s good on background.

Posted by: annie | Jan 16 2011 1:39 utc | 10

Annie those two links are to a site whose sole justification appears to be to give credibility to the flawed and dishounarble STL inquiry which the Lebanesse people want shut down before it does any more damage to their community.
Most of the posts are along the lines of “STL good Hezbollah bad” without offering a skerrick of evidence to support those claims.
They try and finesse Hariri jnr’s involvement with the false witness as “move along nothing to see here” despite young Hariri’s oft repeated denial that he had any involvement with this proven perjurer. Expect anything on that site to have been as edited and distorted as its motives.

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jan 16 2011 3:14 utc | 11

Debs is dead,
I would encourage you to actually spend some time on the site reading the posts before judging it. For example, if you were to read the second link that Annie posted, you’d find a critique of the CBC report that claimed to have inside knowledge of the STL proceedings. As for your contention that most of the posts are along the lines of “STL good Hezbollah bad, without offering a skerrick of evidence to support those claims,” I would be interested to see you provide some evidence of your own for this claim. Hezbollah comes under criticism to be sure, but so do Hariri and his lot. And do “the Lebanese people” really want to see the back of the STL? If that were the case, we would not find ourselves in the current crisis. Our problem is that half the population wants it, while the other half does not, as much as you would like to think otherwise.
Read. You’ll learn something.

Posted by: Qifa Nabki | Jan 18 2011 18:09 utc | 12

@ Qifa Nabki I did read all of the second article and what I learnt was that although I may have rushed to judgement about the website, my criticism of the investigation still stands.
Communications analysis which relies almost entirely on pure data without human witness input is worse than useless, because it is capable of being manipulated at the time it is being generated as well as being distorted by a subjective inquiry.
An example. Even if the ‘red network’ phones were being used by the agents following Hariri about, and were used to stay in contact with each other; if the users only had as much knowledge of cell phone investigative techniques as say a big city street level drug dealer, they would have known that the existence of their network would be discovered almost immediately after the assasination. They would also have known that any person who owned/used a cell phone that had shared the same proximity and time as one of the ‘red network’ phones would almost certainly be investigated, along with anyone called from any phone which contemporaneously accessed the same tower.
The same linkages to towers would be made to ascertain if the suspects several phones. This can go on ad infinitum so the heavy usage of cell phones and certain high traffic phone towers, means that this method of analysis quickly approximates that of the DEA back in the early 80’s when they tried to bring charges against ‘certain people’ in Miami on the grounds that their currency contained traces of cocaine. At that time about 90% of the bills tested in the Miami area were contaminated with cocaine; once the judges were told this the cases fell over.
THe odds would be high that the investigators could work backwards to ‘prove’ that Mr X who own cellphone n also had also been in possesion of one of the red network mobiles.
In the case of the Hariri investigation, there is every reason to suspect that the carefully selected STL ‘referees’ would be unlikely to toss something easily even if they were informed of the flaws in this type of analysis. The insanely perverted investigation & prosecution of al-Megrahi and Fhimah for the Lockerbie bombing is sufficient reason for HA to distrust the objectivity of the STL.
Sure HA accused may eventually win in court eventually that is if the amerikans didn’t take it upon themselves to render the accused back to amerika for a good old supermax slam dunk lockdown, or flick them towards Guantanamo Bay, Bagram Airbase or Diego Garcia (the one no one especially not the red cross/crescent gets anywhere near). But by the time that happens amerika will have pasted HA back to the stoneage with drone attacks, abductions and false flag assassinations. All the while telling any lie they think will fit to rationalise the non-existence of any due-process.
One last comment; if the split in Lebanese public opinion is truly 50:50 why is that votes are weighted to ensure that the votes of those more likely to support HA aligned candidates are worth less? Since there hasn’t been a census in Lebanon since 1932 exact figures are hard to come by, but even the CIA factbook hardly impartial towards muslims as it is, concedes Muslims make up around 59% of the current Lebanese population and xtians about 40%.
Yet the confessional allocation for the 2009 election gave xtians 64 seats in parliament to Islam’s 64 seats.
So does your claim of a 50/50 divide on the inquiry take that into account or is it like much else in Lebanon, weighted to favour the xtian point of view?

Posted by: Debs is dead | Jan 19 2011 7:11 utc | 13