Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
December 30, 2010
The Washington Post’s Link With al-Qaeda

As the Washington Post reports, the British police believes that the Washington Post has links to al-Qaeda. The British police also seems to believe that I am a likely terrorist.

This week the British secret services hauled in some twelve poor chaps from Bangladesh for allegedly planing terror attacks. Three of those dangerous folks were let go after a day but the other nine are still in custody.

The Washington Post's piece about the issue on its 'World' page is prominently headlined "Terror suspects alleged link to al-Qaeda group".

The story itself says:

LONDON – Nine men arrested in Britain on terrorism charges last week found inspiration and bomb-making instructions in an English-language Internet magazine published by al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, British investigators reportedly said.

The revelation, relayed by British newspapers, provided the first purported link between the nine British-based suspects, some of Bangladeshi origin, and an anti-Western terrorism campaign being waged by Yemen-based jihadists of Yemeni, Saudi, U.S. and other nationalities under the aegis of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

In links related to the story, the Washington Post helpfully offers INSPIRE: full version of the al-Qaeda propaganda magazine which is hosted on its website.


bigger

As the British police obviously thinks that owning a copy of that magazine is a serious indication for a connection to al-Qaeda, the WaPo editors shall better defer from visiting London.

From The Telegraph we learn of other serious indications of foreigners planing terror attacks in London:

A reconnaissance trip is alleged to have been made from Trafalgar Square, down Whitehall to Westminster Bridge where Big Ben was studied intently.

A mobile phone had appeared to be raised and pointed towards the clock tower, the court heard.

Westminster Abbey, the Palace of Westminster and the London Eye were also closely examined before the Church of Scientology near Blackfriars was allegedly observed intently for some minutes.

The journey ended with a meal in a McDonald’s fast food restaurant, the court heard.

So a sightseeing walk along London's attractions, taking a picture of Big Ben, looking at pretty buildings and eating crap at a Mac D is now a terrorist reconnaissance trip?

Dear British police, I confess that I have downloaded the Inspire magazine – all three editions. I read the Inspire nonsense piece on "How to make a pipe bomb in the kitchen of your mom”. I confess that I have made several long terrorist reconnaissance trips in London. These including making pictures of Big Ben and a ride on the London Eye. Places that could blow up any day! And beware! Just an hour ago I bought some strong explosives and I WILL USE THEM tomorrow night.

Now, you idiots, come and get me.

Comments

Well, we’re all screwed anyway.

Posted by: beq | Dec 30 2010 17:53 utc | 1

the ‘war on terror’ has really stretched the meaning of the word, ridiculous

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Dec 30 2010 18:33 utc | 2

I thought there might be hope… but then I read this:
The great religion of peace
The comments are some of the most asinine and ignorant of any place I’ve read… and those are just my comments 😉
There is such a disconnect between what people believe is happening and what’s actually happening. I always am amazed how the very people who whine and moan about how the government screws-up everything else in the world, are so willingly to carry a gun for the military.
Why can’t people can’t see they’ve being manipulated by the zionist into fighting a war against anti-usury, ahem, um, Islam. But don’t tell anyone I told you.
I was trying to argue a point and I googled what was the first modern terrorist? and I was surprised as to who made the top of the list… and we’re worried about arab terrorist? Sheesh!
Peace

Posted by: DaveS | Dec 30 2010 18:56 utc | 3

@DaveS Why can’t people can’t see they’ve being manipulated by the zionist into fighting a war against anti-usury, ahem, um, Islam.
Hey, you are NOT supposed to tell anyone why the U.S., ahem, um, Goldman, decided to make war on Islam.

Posted by: b | Dec 30 2010 19:21 utc | 4

The hype about terror is all so lame and transparent it is beyond pathetic.
Remember the anthrax scandal and deaths just when the Patriot Act was to be voted in? Housewives were advised to keep children at home, away from school, and have duct tape to hand. Duct tape!
Bio warfare was the big scare then, had been hyped for many years. Decades actually.
Memory lane: The one little vial of botulinum discovered in a fridge in Iraq?
The test tube of botulinum presented by Washington and London as evidence that Saddam Hussein had been developing and concealing weapons of mass destruction, was found in an Iraqi scientist’s home refrigerator, where it had been sitting for 10 years, it emerged yesterday. David Kay, the expert appointed by the CIA to lead the hunt for weapons, told a congressional committee last week that the vial of botulinum had been “hidden” at the scientist’s home, and could be used to “covertly surge production of deadly weapons”.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/oct/07/uk.iraq
The bio warfare BS has now faded out as despite funding and prodding and offered opportunities – nobody has taken it up. The difficulty is that even crazy and impoverished ppl need motivation beyond money to get their act together, and bio attacks are too complicated, nasty and dangerous to everyone.
Btw, the Swedish authorities knew about their minor terror attack beforehand, in case anybody missed that.
http://www.thelocal.se/30794/20101212/

Posted by: Noirette | Dec 30 2010 20:24 utc | 5

@Noirette (Didn’t you drop this handle in favor of Tangerine once? Oh, well… I like it in a nostalgic sort of way)~
That piece in The Local was discussed already (around post number 50 and onwards)and was sourced to a Danish tabloid. Your point stands, but I wouldn’t look for any hard evidence of it.

Posted by: Monolycus | Dec 30 2010 23:41 utc | 6

There has been a commute to work between my scrawling off that #6 and now, and I was thinking about this issue in the taxi on the way here.
I think I might have missed Noirette’s point about the flimsy nature of evidence (a piece in a tabloid newspaper that indicates prior knowledge is probably as or more substantial than a 10 year old phial of botulinin toxin is to indicate an advanced Iraqi bioweapons division.) And that’s what this War on Terror is really about, isn’t it? Which piece of dubious happenstance do you want to cling to in order to reinforce what you want to believe? The WaPo piece isn’t any more credible than an Ekstra Bladet piece at the end of the day,and peoples lives and livelihoods in the age we live in are harrassed or terminated on the merest of circumstantial suspicions to confirm what we already want to believe.
I’ve engaged in enough Internet debates to know that linking to a source is enough to confirm one party’s hysterical a priori conclusions, and there is no authority infallible enough not to be dismissed if it runs counter to another party’s hysterical a priori conclusions. (I think that’s what I missed most about this place… b and many others here have, in the past, consistently done a pretty good job of not falling into traps of confirmation bias.)
Well, anyway, I’ve dedicated enough bandwidth in the past to ranting about how people will believe what they want in the face of any other evidence, and how the idea of “uncovering the truth” is an adolescent fantasy. The “War on Terror” is already the quintessential example of anti-intellectual pursuits, and there is very little room for rhyme or reason in the minds of those who embrace the fantasy. Minds are made up and attitudes ossified, and suffering in this world will continue unabated regardless of what we, or anyone else, point to as proof of how very, very unnecessary all of it is.

Posted by: Monolycus | Dec 31 2010 0:37 utc | 7

“…how people will believe what they want in the face of any other evidence, and how the idea of “uncovering the truth” is an adolescent fantasy. The “War on Terror” is already the quintessential example of anti-intellectual pursuits, and there is very little room for rhyme or reason in the minds of those who embrace the fantasy. Minds are made up and attitudes ossified, and suffering in this world will continue unabated regardless of what we, or anyone else, point to as proof of how very, very unnecessary all of it is.”
Indeed, it’s like shoved through an mirror of Imaginarium

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 31 2010 9:47 utc | 8

david, the top of your list on your link was is the Baader-Meinhof Gang. what makes them ‘modern’. where do we begin and end? this is a list that might interest you.

* Bombs in cafés: first used by Zionists in Palestine on 17 March 1937 in Jaffa (they were grenades)
* Bombs on buses: first used by Zionists in Palestine on 20 August- 26 September 1937
* Drive-by shootings with automatic weapons: IZL and LHI in 1937-38 and 1947-48 (Morris, Righteous Victims, p681.)
* Bombs in market places: first used by Zionists on 6 July 1938 in Haifa. (delayed-action, electrically detonated)
* Bombing of a passenger ship: first used by the Zionists in Haifa on 25 November 1940, killing over 200 of their own fellows.
* Bombing of hotels: first used by Zionists on 22 July 1946 in Jerusalem (Menachem Begin went on to become prime minister of Israel).
* Suitcase bombing: first used by Zionists on 1 October 1946 against British embassy in Rome.
* Mining of ambulances: first used by Zionists on 31 October 1946 in Petah Tikvah
* Car-bomb: first used by Zionists against the British near Jaffa on 5 December 1946.
* Letter bombs: first used by Zionists in June 1947 against members of the British government, 20 of them.
* Parcel bomb: first used by Zionists against the British in London on 3 September 1947.
* Reprisal murder of hostages: first used by Zionists against the British in Netanya area on 29 July 1947.
* Truck-bombs: first used by Zionists on January 1948 in the centre of Jaffa, killing 26.
* Aircraft hijacking: world-first by Israeli jets December 1954 on a Syrian civilian airliner (random seizure of hostages to recover five spies) – 14 years before any Palestinian hijacking.

Posted by: annie | Jan 1 2011 9:24 utc | 9

b says…

“…I bought some strong explosives and I WILL USE THEM tomorrow night.”

i cant figure out if you bought firecrackers to shoot off at midnight, or if you’re fertilizing the rosebushes again.

Posted by: flickervertigo | Jan 1 2011 9:51 utc | 10

@Monolycus, yes Noirette, Tangerine are the same person, in various orders, on another board I am Noizette, as suddenly Noirette was not accepted (not banned as a person) who knows, I just forge ahead and change names.
Yes about the ‘terrorism’, as you say, really all I was illustrating, not stating, is that much of the information, given out by authorities or spokesmen or even informants, leakers, and then cherry picked or augmented or whatever by the media, really makes no sense at all. (Ppl do die and I am not making light of that.) Or should it stand, ppl (and that includes most bloggers, etc.) don’t try to make sense of it.
It all reads like fiction – bare-bones silly plots that exist nowhere else, not in books, tv series, movies, adventure stories for children, or low-level video games, all of which would refuse to include items as ridiculous the vial of botulism for ex, or the one report in paper, etc.
So why does the ‘news’ go on like this? Does their authority mean they can get away with it? Is it the short cycle, the fact that news rolls over day by day, and it is expected that ppl – considered stupid and uneducated – react to snippets without a complete plot and go Hoo How Scary?
Or is there a more underground mechanism at work, not a ‘conspiracy’ between the various actors, but rather a jubilatory, narcissistic cynicism, that makes the success (or acceptance or at least ignorance of) completely loony propaganda items a matter of pride, or silent satisfaction masked with hypocritical serious alarm? We can make get ppl to internalize these memes? There are other explanations possible.

Posted by: Noirette | Jan 2 2011 18:14 utc | 11