Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
December 29, 2010
Some Help For Race For Iran

Israel's relentless campaign to incite a U.S. led military attack on Iran intensified this year. It will further intensify next year and will continue until the bombs fall on Tehran.

With many U.S. troops still in Iraq and Afghanistan a low risk military attack is not yet possible. But by the end of 2011 U.S. troops will likely have left Iraq and by the end of 2014 they will probably have left Afghanistan. After that an attack on Iran is very likely.

The history of the war on Iraq has shown that the chance of a low risk attack can and will be furthered by long years of ever increasing sanctions and a parallel campaign of brainwashing of the U.S. public. That is why the ongoing campaign against Iran is extremely dangerous.

The only people who argue with some success against that campaign, against war and for a big U.S.-Iran relation realignment are Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett. At their blog, the Race for Iran, they are asking for  contributions to help that cause.

If you can, please send them some $$$s.

Comments

this is an excellent blog.

Posted by: annie | Dec 30 2010 0:58 utc | 1

*heh* A little Monkey Wrench…?
Iran ‘three years away from bomb’

…Israel’s minister of strategic affairs said yesterday that technical difficulties have pushed back the Iranian timetable for producing a nuclear weapon. Moshe Yaalon, a former military chief of staff whose portfolio includes monitoring Iran, said he believes Tehran is at least three years away from developing a nuclear bomb.
Israeli military officials have said Iran has the expertise to build a bomb, but still needs time to gather the necessary materials. Yaalon’s assessment matches past Israeli estimates that Iran is anywhere from one to three years away from developing a weapon.
“These difficulties postpone the timetable, so we can’t talk about a point of no return. Iran does not currently have the ability to produce nuclear weapons by itself,” he said.
“It could happen in the next three years if the process succeeds. I hope it won’t succeed at all and that the Western world’s effort will ultimately bring about Iran not having a nuclear capability.”
Yaalon said evaluating Iran’s secretive nuclear programme is an imprecise science, noting that under past assessments he delivered while in the army, Iran should already have achieved weapons capability.

Oopsie…!
Now, what about those f$%cking Sanctions…! *gah*

Posted by: CTuttle | Dec 30 2010 1:26 utc | 2

Not to cause any dissension, but I find it hard to believe that a small grass root thing, would have any chance against a massive Psywar

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 30 2010 1:46 utc | 3

the only thing we have to keep in mind is caroline glick’s legend of iran/north korean nuke cooperation.
…and the new york time’s article about the deterioration of our nuclear forensics capability.
the upshot being
*yawn*

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 1:47 utc | 4

once you’ve abandoned morals…

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 2:21 utc | 5

after nine beers, i admit i should have gone home and shut up.
in the meantime, i keep thinking that we’re better than

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 2:40 utc | 6

better than what we are.

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 2:47 utc | 7

The only people who argue with some success against that campaign, against war and for a big U.S.-Iran relation realignment are Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett.
That statement is sad and flat out wrong.
Ron Paul has been tireless in his efforts against a war on Iran. To imply that these media darlings have influenced more people is elitism, pure and simple.
Not a single mention of Ron Paul on their blog. This fact, in itself, is astounding. In addition, looking at the background of these two individuals, and red lights go off on my tin-foil hat. No doubt they are darlings of the mainstream media. I agree with Gerald Celente when it comes to U.S. policy makers: “Harvard, Princeton, Yale – bullets, bombs, and banks”
Annie, will you be working to support Obama again in the next Presidential election? Your quick response of an endorsement here reminds me of that era.

Posted by: Rick Happ | Dec 30 2010 2:50 utc | 8

ron paul is a token hero
very effective, too

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 2:54 utc | 9

Rick…! I’m a notorious Firebagger…! 😉
Is Dennis running again…?

Posted by: CTuttle | Dec 30 2010 3:04 utc | 10

“chained to the oily grail and six-point paranoid fairy tales”
is that the problem?

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 3:13 utc | 11

forty buck bag

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 3:17 utc | 12

it’s pretty cute that chinese technology lets americans express their discontent.

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 3:22 utc | 13

we have to assume that aumann gamed all this shit out, and it’s part of the plan.

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 3:24 utc | 14

CTuttle,
I liked Kucinich’s foreign policy positions and much of his economic positions. Unfortunately, the Ohio Republicans, thru redistricting, are planning on eliminating his district completely – it won’t exist!! Due to the bad economy, the population in that area has declined, and there will not be as many districts as before.
In some ways, especially when it comes to the health care bill, I am a Firebagger also. The Tea Party has been skillfully co-opted by the Republicans thru Cable media and Limbaugh.
Without the public option, the health care bill is my worst nightmare. Why should anyone be forced to buy insurance from a large private Corporation?

Posted by: Rick Happ | Dec 30 2010 3:30 utc | 15

“Prof. Aumann: “I, too, am very pessimistic and despaired. We lack now the desire to exist, we lack the patience to exist. We lack Zionism with a capital Z. We’ve become post-Zionists, the number one enemy of ourselves; yes, I don’t forget it’s all because of us. Just because of us. My people has simply gone mad.”

fuck me dead
what we gotta do, to cheer doc aumann up, is kill a few thousand more palestinians.

Posted by: flickervertigo | Dec 30 2010 3:37 utc | 16

The pieces are slowly being assembled to make Iran overreact like Japan did; with sanctions till Pearl Harbour happened(I could be wrong in this).
On U.S. request, India shuts payment route for Iran oil imports
Read that carefully to see the ways Israelis are getting to cripple Iran economically.
This is terrorism. And then people wonder about car bombs, assassinations and general mayhem.
And I keep thinking, whyTF does my country go along with this?
Eunuchs, the lot of them.

Posted by: shanks | Dec 30 2010 5:06 utc | 17

Juan Cole’s ‘Informed Comment’: Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion
From ‘Informed Comment’ website 11/14/2010:
Ron Paul: We’ve Already Declared War on Iran.
From ‘Informed COmment’ Website 12/11/2010:
Paul Defends Wikileaks: Neocons Don’t Like Losing Grip on Empire

Posted by: Rick Happ | Dec 30 2010 6:22 utc | 18

Welcome Shanks, pour you a glass?
Here’s the Western spin…
India hopes for quick solution to Iran payments issue

Posted by: Uncle $cam | Dec 30 2010 7:26 utc | 19

Now that MoA is open again, and Obama’s name is mentioned, I can’t help but think of him (while president-elect) golfing as Gaza was being pounded into rubble. Of course I understand completely why he didn’t comment…
Such a man of piece… piece of something foul. Just like all the other piece presidents before him.

Posted by: DaveS | Dec 30 2010 13:31 utc | 20

Cryptogram is usually a good read, especially for us programmers, and especially for me, a SciFi fan (it’s loaded with stuff about asymmetric/hi-tech and often non-lethal warfare techniques). There are some interesting essays about the TSA flap up front, but buried in the news links are these three interleaved gems with news from Symantec’s investigation into Stuxnet and it’s purpose(s):
Symantec blog: Stuxnet: A Breakthrough
Wired: Clues Suggest Stuxnet Virus Was Built for Subtle Nuclear Sabotage
UK Register: Missing piece completes Stuxnet jigsaw – Malware targets frequency converter drives from two specific vendors
The first piece, from Symantec, has the goods. The other two follow up with some more details, and some interesting speculation/conjecture. Seems to me like a damn-near outright confirmation of the suspected source and purpose of Stuxnet.

Posted by: Dr. Wellington Yueh | Dec 30 2010 22:24 utc | 21

The history of the war on Iraq has shown that the chance of a low risk attack can and will be furthered by long years of ever increasing sanctions and a parallel campaign of brainwashing of the U.S. public. ….
Yes, that is what history would show.
Won’t happen. (I hope.)
The sanctions are not effective, who pays attention to them?
Many US cos. sell their stuff in Iran, allowed and all. They sell cigarettes (big trade), booze, perfume, clothes, shoes, medication, weapons and military gear, aircraft and aircraft parts, medical machinery, not to mention corn, wood pulp, soy, vegetable seeds, bull semen, chemical fertilizer, and more.
For US imports from Iran (very minimal for sure) see link from the US Census Bureau:
http://tinyurl.com/395olqn
In CH US citizens can no longer open bank accounts, Iranians have no problems at all. (A low level ex. but quite telling.)
Iranians are not deprived of child toys, eye-glasses, basic medication, parts for electrical plants, paper goods, chlorine, antibiotics, footballs, orthopedic materials, medical machinery, seeds, various widgets, boom boxes, syringes, and on and on, as Iraq was.
Russia and China are doing brisk trade with Iran, including agreements for future energy deals, as amply reported in the press.
The sanctions are a joke, a masquerade. Everybody laughs at the US, eh what exactly are they forbidding and what is their authority? No pistachios or dates from Iran in the US?
Iran exports its oil to Japan, China, India and S Korea.

Posted by: Noirette | Dec 30 2010 22:46 utc | 22